The left-wing controlled Oxfordshire County Council’s new plans to divide the British city of Oxford into six “15-minute cities”. In these new “smart” districts, it is said, most household essentials will be accessible by a quarter-of-an-hour walk or bike ride, so residents will not need a car.
To seize further control of people’s lives, Globalists are pushing the false idea that these cities will “save the planet” and help all of humanity. Instead, they are nothing more than a way for them to restrict, coerce, fine, punish, surveil, and limit the fundamental right of freedom of movement for residents.
People do not realize that residents will only be allowed within 15 minutes of their home address, and violators will be fined. For example, under the new proposals, if any of Oxford’s 150,000 residents drive outside their designated district more than 100 days a year, they could be fined £70. In addition, the government will track and control your every movement through your smartphones & facial recognition technology, explains UK journalist Katie Hopkins:
So if your mother, for example, is over here, you wouldn’t be able to just go across and see her. This would all be done via E-Gates [electronic gates uses facial recognition technology to check your identity], and number plate recognition. You in your area will only be allowed within that 15-minute zone that you’ve been allocated. The number plate recognition will know if you leave your zone. And you can apply for permission, a permit, to leave your zone and travel to another zone. But you’ll only be allowed to do this about 100 times a year.
And if you use up all your 100 passes, that someone designates whether you’re allowed to have to go into the different zones, you’ll be fined. Your number plate will be recognized, it will observe that you’ve gotten somewhere you’re not allowed in your own city. And it will find you 100 pounds or 80 pounds or whatever the fine number is.
Globalists like to present their 15-minute cities as being for the ‘people, environment, and the greater good. However, Hopkins warns that these claims are nothing but a way to control people. Furthermore, these restrictions come from high-placed politicians and wealthy institutions who do not follow their own rules. And it was only after Covid lockdowns that the previously unthinkable idea of confining people to their local areas for the greater good was able to gain currency,” reports Spiked.
As usual, ordinary people will suffer the costs of the 15-minute city. “There will be permits, penalties, and almost certainly more ubiquitous surveillance. But, if people thought the Covid lockdowns stripped them of their freedoms, divided families and friends, and placed tedious unscientific rules on them, the new 15-minute cities would have an even worse effect, explains Hopkins.
United Nations Agenda 2030
The “15-minute city” concept is crucial in the United Nations Agenda 2030 and their Net Zero green agenda. The World Economic Forum is also pushing this new concept. Oxford, which has declared a ‘climate emergency,’ is hoping their 15-minute cities will help achieve the council’s ‘Net Zero carbon Oxford’ vision by 2040.”
However, as RAIR Foundation USA previously reported, “the socialists pushing these outrageous proposals care much less about the environment than about controlling you.” UN Agenda 2030 is nothing less than global government tyranny that enslaves all humanity while calling the scheme “sustainable development” and “equality.”
1 comment:
Sticks and stones will break our bones, but words will never hurt us; if one does not buy con jobs, said label “Extremist’s” applied is not applicable to what we know as Freedom to have an opinion, speak truths, or be free thinker's ourselves, IMO! USA has Constitution right? Why entertain an Organizations Agenda for us? More questions than answers since our own Constitution seems to be compromised by an Agenda filled words for sustainability globally?
IMO, seems,” Extremist’s" fits more those that push some wordy Sustainable Agenda 2030 that comes with pressure to accept changing everything working just fine, to now be working differently as some new “Transformation” with pushed concepts not proven beyond a doubt, right?
From hearing/using the word "Sustainability" with Business Administration Business Management Degree's, this "Sustainable" word does not get used properly aligned with what is being encompassed with ALL as described by said folks, in my opinion! Read Agenda 2023, it's what the world, the USA has always tried to achieve, but the undercurrents evolving from reputed information, exposes an underbelly of major misconceptions in order to impose 2030 globally, in my opinion, and as understanding messaging.
Thus far those sustainable concepts implemented has proven more non-sustainable and created hardship for the Global Communities, right? USA is better? IMO, Majority of American Citizen's don't agree as has been expressed.
Level Playing Field does not enter their equation either. Science does not become an applied variable with all their narrative neither, in my opinion. What we have here are creative ideas that are being introduced as simulations first, later as experimentations on mankind without consent or seeking people's decisions as to whether or not to participate, as it's being reputed, IMO. Me love creativity to the max, yet like an artist, or having a product, you can introduce your creations, ideas, sell them even, but never impose them in any way that breaks our Laws, hurts, kills, restricts, or compromises other's Freedoms, or Rights, right?
If actions speak louder than words, the words are left meaningless if implemented actions are counter-productive to said words; "Sustainable" and "Transformation" used must fit actions at the end of the day. Articles indicate actions set in motion are concerning at every level, right? IMO, everyone has a concern because of the money behind those wanting to push this on everyone, like it's a do or die alternative; we are back to free will to choose wisely. (:
Post a Comment