Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Extreme Persecution In Nigeria Escalating


Nigeria: It Is Time For The US Government And The Media To Answer Their Cries

The conditions in northern Nigeria have deteriorated significantly over the past six months. Attacks have increased dramatically — it feels as though massacres have become a daily occurrence. I recently spoke at a burial for eight people who were killed in a single night. The very next day, another 30 people were murdered in a separate attack. A few days later, 20 more lost their lives. It has become almost impossible to keep up with the scale and frequency of the violence.

Boko Haram and other terrorist groups have grown bolder in both their rhetoric and their actions. A few weeks ago, Boko Haram released a video declaring their intent to drive Christians out of the northern region by force. Another video warned that all Christians must “convert to Islam or be killed.” Attacks by radicalized Fulani groups have also escalated, leaving Christian communities paralyzed by fear.

Almost 150 Christians were slaughtered during Holy Week — 34 on Easter Sunday alone — making it one of the deadliest Holy Weeks on record here in Northern Nigeria. This has precipitated the need for a new and important ministry for us at Across Nigeria as we are now serving over 547 widows whose husbands were killed in recent attacks — and the numbers and need are growing rapidly.

We have worked in northern Nigeria for more than a decade, and I have never seen conditions this severe.

One thing that has become increasingly clear to me is that the situation is not improving. In fact, it has grown significantly worse. With now more than 70,000 killed since 2009, it’s time to put an end to the genocide of Christians in northern Nigeria.

The genocide taking place here has been ignored for well over a decade. That’s why, when President Trump spoke out about it, I was encouraged. He was the first president to speak out on the issue, which had been largely overlooked by both the Obama and Biden administrations. Not only did the president speak up about the issue, he put his words into action.

On Christmas Day, President Trump ordered airstrikes in the northwest to target a new and rapidly growing terrorist group known as Lakurawa. Finally, there was a president willing to intervene. I was not the only one encouraged — much of the Christian community in northern Nigeria felt the same way. For the first time, many believed their cries were being heard and that the United States was standing with them.

As encouraged as I was, concern weighed heavy in the back of my mind. I hoped this would not be another case of the U.S. launching airstrikes, then ultimately abandoning the situation. Unfortunately, there is a history of this pattern. We saw it in Libya in 2011 and again in Afghanistan in 2021, to name a few recent examples. My concern with the Christmas Day strikes was — and has always been — that the U.S. would strike and then withdraw, leaving an inevitable vacuum that would make the situation even worse.

Apart from a small company of U.S. troops working counter-terrorism and utilizing some drones, that is exactly what has happened.

Now, the consequences of these actions are becoming a grim reality. The initial action, followed by a lack of sustained engagement, has had a devastating effect. Instead of backing down, radicalized terrorist groups have been emboldened and have intensified their attacks.

We have also seen a shift in the posture of the Nigerian Army and security forces. With the United States appearing disengaged, there is a growing perception that Nigerian Army forces are choosing sides. Whether by order — implicit or explicit — or the need for survival, one speculates, but cannot clearly tell.

One consistent account I hear when visiting communities that have suffered attacks is that security forces almost always arrive only after the violence has already occurred. A Boko Haram informant recently told me that they drive back and forth in front of security forces and Army outposts without ever being stopped or hindered. He said the only time security forces respond to their presence is when they are directly engaged. Otherwise, in his words, “We have free rein.”

I’m not a warmonger. In fact, I have strong isolationist leanings. But after watching an increasing cycle of violence over the past decade, it’s clear that something has to be done.



Will Trump's China Visit Determine The Fate Of The War?


Trump's China visit will determine the fate of the war


The US president's visit to China has become the central axis on which the continuation of the war with Iran depends, as a power that proved in the past that it can influence Iran and set limits for it is a key player. After being harmed by the blockade of Hormuz and helping the Iranians with intelligence, China could advance the US terms in negotiations in exchange for demands of its own on Taiwan.

In Israel and the Gulf states, officials believe that the Americans will not resume strikes on Iran at least until after President Donald Trump's meeting with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping.

According to two diplomatic sources, the Americans have made clear to their allies in the region that the high level of military readiness is ungoing, the US Navy is maintaining its blockade on Iranian ships, and the accumulation of additional equipment, including interceptors, is also continuing. But, Trump is giving the diplomatic channel a chance.

"The president will not come to China against the backdrop of a war, since he wants to enlist the Chinese president in moves that will bring the war to an end through a deal," one of the sources told Israel Hayom.

According to the source, the Chinese are the most significant international actor capable of pressuring the Revolutionary Guards, and they are also the ones that have been badly harmed by the blockade of Hormuz. On the other hand, he added, they will not help Trump for free, and will try as much as possible to prevent an agreement that would lead to US involvement in Iran's oil sector. The compensation they demand may be connected to Taiwan.

In Israel Hayom, we reported that China had already intervened about a month ago by exerting pressure on the regime in an effort to bring about, at the very least, a ceasefire. That pressure, together with the military blows, did indeed lead to a halt in military actions, even though Iran withdrew from its agreement to open Hormuz unconditionally. 

Beijing warned Tehran at the time that if the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz continued, it would turn to alternative oil sources and consider suspending the strategic cooperation agreement between the two countries.

Israel Hayom has learned that, at the request of the Arab Gulf states, the Chinese demanded that Iran refrain from bombing them. Iran complied only partially, and in the latest flare-up over the weekend it attacked the United Arab Emirates, but did not expand the strikes to Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf states.

On the other hand, according to the Americans, China assisted Iran with intelligence information. As a result, the US Treasury Department announced that it was imposing sanctions on three Chinese companies accused of helping Iran's military carry out attacks on US forces during the war. According to the report from the US State Department, the Chinese companies provided satellite images that enabled Iranian military attacks against US forces in the region. The reference is apparently to attacks on US bases in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar.


At the same time, against the backdrop of energy distress caused by the blockade of Hormuz, the European Union is beginning to show signs of involvement, even if only minimal. European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the EU would expand its sanctions against Iran to include those responsible for disrupting freedom of navigation. She accused Iran of responsibility for the escalation in the strait, but clarified that the EU sought to help renew negotiations with Iran in order to end the conflict.

Kallas also said that EU foreign ministers had agreed to strengthen cooperation with the countries on the shores of the Persian Gulf after the Iran war and to accelerate work on strategic partnership agreements with all six countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council.





Data center caught using 30 million gallons of ‘unbilled’ water as Georgia residents’ taps drizzle


Data center caught using 30 million gallons of ‘unbilled’ water as Georgia residents’ taps drizzle


Georgia residents were left outraged when they discovered a massive data center had been guzzling up nearly 30 million gallons of water without paying for it.

The issue began last year when residents in the affluent subdivision of Annelise Park in Fayetteville noticed their water pressure was unusually low, Politico reports.

When the county utility then investigated the problem, officials discovered that developer Quality Technology Services (QTS) had installed two industrial-scale water hookups to the approximately 6.2 million square foot data center campus – located about 20 miles south of downtown Atlanta.

One of the water connections appeared to have been installed without anyone at the water utility knowing, while the other was not linked to the company’s account – and it therefore was not being billed.

By May 15, 2025, the Fayette County Water System sent a letter to QTS, saying it owed nearly $150,000 for using more than 29 million gallons of water – the equivalent of 44 Olympic-size swimming pools, far exceeding the limit agreed to during the planning process.

QTS, which is owned by private equity firm Blackstone, eventually paid off the $147,474 debt and was not charged any extra fines.

But the company’s massive water usage only came to light last week when resident James Clifton obtained the 2025 letter to QTS from a public records request, and posted it to Facebook.

Meanwhile, the entire state of Georgia is experiencing moderate to high levels of drought. Governor Brian Kemp has even declared a state of emergency in response to one of the state’sworst wildfire outbreaks in years.

Developer Quality Technology Services installed two industrial-scale water hookups without officials at the Fayette County water authority’s knowledge.

In May 2025, the Fayette County Water System sent a letter to QTS, saying it owed nearly $150,000 for using more than 29 million gallons of water at its data center (pictured) – the equivalent of 44 Olympic-size swimming pools

When residents were then told to scale back their own water usage, their frustrations with the data center reached a boiling point.

‘We get this notification from Fayette County water system saying you need to stop watering your lawns to help conserve water,’ said Clifton, a local attorney who is now running for county office.

‘So the first thing they do is lean on the individuals and the citizens to stop water consumption, when we have QTS that’s just absolutely draining us – most months it’s the number one consumer of water in the county.

‘It’s just frustrating to see them come into our community and run all over us, like the citizens don’t matter, and then they’re above the law when they do break it,’ Clifton added as he railed against the fact that the water utility did not penalize or fine the data center.

He also shared on Facebook on Sunday that the data center – one of the largest in the country – has been watering its landscape ‘nearly continuously’ for four days.





The Saudi 'No' Puts Abraham Accords Into Deep Freeze


The Saudi 'No' Puts Abraham Accords Into Deep Freeze
PIERRE REHOV/



Riyadh has chosen its words with care, yet the meaning could hardly be more clear. Saudi Arabia will not recognize the State of Israel -- not under the present Israeli government and -- here comes the poison pill -- not before the creation of an independent Palestinian state along the 1949 "Auschwitz" armistice lines, with East Jerusalem as its capital.

The Saudi foreign minister has framed this stance as a strategic principle rather than a negotiating position. A 2025 survey conducted by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy revealed that 99% of Saudi citizens view normalization with Israel as a negative development. The Abraham Accords, once touted as a breakthrough, have quietly moved, in Saudi political conversation, into the deep freeze.

Once US President Donald J. Trump, without Saudi Arabia lifting a finger, relieved the kingdom of its foremost adversary, Iran, and removed the major threat to the kingdom, what would Saudi Arabia need Israel for anyway? To the Saudis, the Abraham Accords doubtless look like an agreement signed by others, but never embraced by the one Arab power that truly mattered.

Only the packaging has changed. After the UN adopted the 1947 partition plan, the Arab League and the Arab states rejected it and opposed any form of Jewish sovereignty on any part of the land, and chose war instead of the two-state solution on offer from the international community.

In September 1967, the Arab League, at its summit in Khartoum, delivered the famous three "no's": no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel. Notably, the declaration made no mention of a Palestinian state, which the late senior PLO official Zuheir Mohsen significantly pointed out in 1977, had not yet been invented:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality, today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

Today's Saudi position, cloaked in the vocabulary of international law and Palestinian self-determination, serves the same purpose: to make any recognition of Israel conditional on terms Riyadh knows Jerusalem cannot accept. Where Khartoum was blunt and openly hostile, the contemporary version is polished, presentable and "politically correct" in Western foreign ministries -- and therefore more potent.

The kingdom no longer conceals its antisemitic undertones that accompany this repositioning. In January 2026, the Anti-Defamation League took the unusual step of issuing a public statement highlighting its alarm over the sharp rise in antisemitic rhetoric in Saudi Arabia and the growing public attacks on the Abraham Accords by prominent Saudi figures. Two weeks later, the front page of the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah labeled the United Arab Emirates a "Zionist Trojan horse" in the Arab world. Such commentary appears in outlets operating under close royal supervision, signaling what the leadership wishes to be heard.




Fear As A Weapon


Fear And Psychological Bioterrorism


Fear is one of the most powerful drugs ever invented.


Unlike antibiotics or antivirals, it requires no FDA approval, no manufacturing plant, and no cold-chain shipping. Fear spreads itself. All it takes is a headline, a few experts on television, ominous music behind a news segment, and suddenly millions of people begin scanning their bodies for symptoms they did not know they had ten minutes earlier.


Psychological Bioterrorism is the weaponization of fear about disease in order to manipulate individuals, populations, markets, and governments. Sometimes the objective is political. Sometimes financial. Sometimes bureaucratic. Often, it is all three at once.


This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a recognized form of psychological warfare. We have written about it extensively in our book Psywar.


In that book, we write about Dr. Alexander Kouzminov, a former Soviet-Russian intelligence officer with deep experience in biological espionage and biosecurity operations, who in 2017, described how fear of infectious disease can be strategically amplified to shape public behavior, influence governments, and create opportunities for those positioned to benefit from the panic. That process is called psychological bioterrorism.


Once you understand the framework, you start seeing the pattern everywhere.


The media shifts into apocalyptic mode. Experts appear to be predicting catastrophe. Computer models project millions dead, if the right circumstances coalesce. Politicians declare emergencies. Pharmaceutical companies announce new products. Social media turns into a digital panic attack. And ordinary people, who just wanted to buy eggs and walk the dog, suddenly feel like civilization is one cough away from collapse.


But if you watched the recent media cycle unfold, you would think half the country was moments away from dying in a cloud of mouse droppings drifting through the HVAC system at Tractor Supply.


The reality is far less cinematic.


This is how psychological bioterrorism works. The pathogen itself matters less than the emotional payload attached to it.


Fear scales faster than facts.


The reason these campaigns work so well is simple. Human beings are biologically wired to fear invisible threats. A wolf outside the cave is frightening. But an invisible virus floating through the air? That activates something much deeper in the human nervous system. You cannot see it. You cannot smell it. You cannot negotiate with it. Every stranger becomes a potential threat. Every cough becomes suspicious.


That loss of control is the point.


More....