Friday, October 16, 2026

At Jerusalem site holy to Jews and Muslims, a fragile status quo is being erased


At Jerusalem site holy to Jews and Muslims, a fragile status quo is being erased
Ilan Ben Zion, 


A barefoot, bearded man wrapped in a prayer shawl raises his voice to a crescendo. Dozens of Jewish worshippers surrounding him respond in a chorus of amens and praises of God in Aramaic, the ancient Jewish vernacular. Several bend down on their knees, then prostrate themselves face down on the ground. An Israeli police officer, one of a half-dozen standing guard around the group, fiddles on his phone.

Just a few years ago, this scene of Jewish worshippers praying openly and vocally atop Jerusalem’s holiest of holy sites – known to Jews as the Temple Mount and to Muslims as the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound – would have been unthinkable. But under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s hard-line government, long-standing restrictions on Jewish prayer at the contested shrine have evaporated.

This quiet shift in policy has tectonic potential. Previous rounds of violence have centered around real or perceived changes to the site’s delicate balance. The 2021 war between Israel and Hamas was fueled by clashes there. And in 2000, the second Palestinian intifada was sparked in part by a visit to the site by Israel’s then-opposition leader, Ariel Sharon, who was a candidate to be prime minister.

The shrine is the place where two ancient Jewish temples stood in antiquity, and it is considered by Jews to be the holiest spot on Earth. The Noble Sanctuary, or al-Haram al-Sharif as it’s called in Arabic, is also Islam’s third-holiest site, and home to the Al-Aqsa Mosque and Jerusalem’s iconic golden Dome of the Rock.

For many Israelis and Palestinians, this location is ground zero in their long-running conflict.

It has been at the spiritual epicenter of the recent war in Gaza, which began with the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack on southern Israel that Hamas called the “Al-Aqsa Flood,” consciously alluding to the shrine. Some religious Jews have called for the construction of a “Third Temple” to replace the golden Dome of the Rock. And since the war in Gaza began three years ago, flags, pins, necklace pendants, military uniform patches, and bumper stickers bearing the image of a Third Temple have proliferated in Israeli public spaces.


Israel captured East Jerusalem – along with the Old City and its Christian, Jewish, and Muslim holy sites – during the 1967 Middle East war. The government later annexed the portion of the city formerly controlled by Jordan and declared the entirety of Jerusalem as its national capital, a move still unrecognized by most countries. Under what was known as the Status Quo, a set of unwritten understandings between Israel and Jordan, the custodian of Jerusalem’s Muslim holy sites, Jews could visit the shrine, but only Muslims could worship there. Israeli police managed security at the site, but the Jordanian-run Islamic trust called the Waqf maintained administrative control.

That decades long arrangement is now in tatters.

The Waqf declined repeated interview requests from the Monitor.

Prominent Israeli rabbis say visiting the sacred site is prohibited. But a growing cohort of religious radicals – including Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s public security minister – advocates Jewish worship and control of the site.

“Today, we are masters of the Temple Mount,” Mr. Ben-Gvir said while visiting the site under heavy police guard in late September, during the Jewish holiday of Sukkot. “This holiday, we will pray here on the Temple Mount, on the most important place, for total victory, for complete redemption, for death to all the terrorists, and for sovereignty here on the most important place for the Jewish people.”

Mr. Netanyahu has insisted that there has been no change to the Status Quo, despite evidence to the contrary. During a recent morning visit, large groups of Jewish worshippers circumambulated the holy site under close police guard, singing psalms at full volume and openly praying.

“We have seen a radical transformation of the whole ecosphere that is the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa,” says Daniel Seidemann, an Israeli attorney whose nongovernmental organization, Terrestrial Jerusalem, tracks geopolitical developments in the city. “What we’re witnessing in recent weeks and months, accelerating, is a dismantling of Jordanian custodianship, the whittling down of their responsibilities at Al-Aqsa.”

Omar Razzaz, a former prime minister of Jordan, says what is taking place at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound is a “dangerous departure from where we stood five, 10, 20 years ago.” If there is further erosion of the old Status Quo, he says, “sacred spaces will be fields of conflict.”

Akiva Ariel heads Beyadenu, one of several groups promoting Jewish prayer at the Temple Mount. According to its figures, almost 69,000 Jewish worshippers visited the holy site last year – a nearly fivefold increase compared with a decade earlier.


The Israel Police refused a request to provide specific figures regarding Jewish worshippers visiting the site. But police statistics from early 2025 show similar growth in the number of visits over roughly the same period.

These changes to the unwritten rules at the holy site aren’t going unnoticed in the broader Muslim world, especially in neighboring Jordan. In September, King Abdullah II told the U.N. General Assembly that the kingdom of Jordan would “continue to uphold the Hashemite custodianship and historic and legal status quo at Muslim and Christian holy sites in Jerusalem.”

He also warned that the “Israeli government’s expansionist appetite is now a regional threat.”





Riots Spread From France And Belgium To Albania

Europe Is Falling: Riots Spread From France And Belgium To Albania

TYLER DURDEN


Social unrest in France, Belgium, and now Albania raises the risk of riot contagion across Europe. Young rioters' involvement gives far-left groups opportunities to exploit grievances and channel them into broader anti-government mobilization.

Local outlets are reporting that "thousands of students," a common phrase MSM corporate media outlets have used to describe the rioters, took to the streets of Albania's capital for a second day of anti-government riots on Wednesday. They set fire to part of the education ministry and attacked other government buildings, yet this suggests the unrest has little to do with classroom sizes and more to do with a coordinated far-left anti-government movement sweeping across Europe.

Riot police deployed tear gas and water cannons to disperse unruly crowds. Kids dressed in all black, usually a sign of far-left involvement, also targeted the prime minister's office, the finance and interior ministries, and nearby businesses.

"The people are very angry at the system. They need to change everything. With this corruption all around, the crime and everything else is happening. And the people now are angry. They need to change the system," demonstrator Enida Bimi told Reuters.

We must ask ourselves, in a rational world: Is the solution to a failing education system to burn it down? Well, in the far-left mindset, certaintly. 

Deputy Prime Minister Albana Koçiu called for restraint yesterday, saying Albania "does not need to burn to change." Education Minister Mirela Kumbaro said the right to protest did not justify violence against public buildings and property.

Albania's state-run news agency said sixteen people were arrested "in connection with violent acts" during riots earlier this week.

The social unrest is less about education and demonstrates how Europe has a terrible disease of far-left extremism that has infected the youth. High-level State Department officials and their European counterparts discussed this concern last summer.

Europe is embarrassing itself on the world stage yet again. It's not just that the unrest is getting out of hand and spreading; its entire progressive utopia (welfare state) is cracking and now breaking as the end game nears. This warns all Americans that welfare states like France are headed for a fiscal crisis.





Iran votes to whip citizens who spread the Gospel


Iran votes to whip citizens who spread the Gospel



An Iranian convert who goes on a Christian satellite channel to tell how he found faith may soon pay for it with 31 to 74 lashes. Last week Iran’s parliament approved Article 22 of a bill titled “Countering the Infiltration of Foreign Intelligence Services and Governments or Entities,” which makes it a crime for Iranian citizens to give interviews to, or hold conversations with, any media outlet or “media figure” that the Ministry of Intelligence has publicly designated as hostile. That list already names the leading Persian-language Christian broadcasters.

“Anybody connected to us, anybody working for us, anybody supporting us, even appearing on our channel, even going and doing a like on our social media, is a criminal, officially criminal,” said Hormoz Shariat, founder of the Dallas-area Iran Alive Ministries, in an interview with Peter Wooding of the Global News Alliance.

The ayatollahs are fighting a war against a television signal. That raises a question with roots going back 2,500 years to the Persian court of King Darius: what happens when an empire writes a law forbidding people to pray?

Under Article 22, violators face six months to two years in prison, fines, deprivation of social rights, and flogging, according to FCNN, a Persian Christian news outlet. Officials of the Islamic Republic are explicitly exempt. A regime spokesman can appear on a “hostile” channel, while a convert who shares his testimony on Mohabat TV can be flogged for it. The bill must still clear further legislative steps, including Guardian Council approval, before it becomes law.

Shariat said the regime’s aim is fear. “Another law, another fear. That’s how they control the people of Iran, passing laws and making it harder to follow [Jesus], so easier persecution,” he said. He added that satellite viewers remain beyond the regime’s reach. “The signal goes over the heads of the mullahs into people’s homes, and the government cannot stop it, and you cannot prove that you are watching it.”

The broadcasts matter because Iran has shut down nearly every other avenue for Christian worship. Since 2009, churches that offered services in Persian have been forced to stop, and pastors who kept ministering to converts in their homes have been arrested and imprisoned along with the converts themselves. Only Iran’s historic Armenian and Assyrian communities may worship, and they are barred from sharing their faith. In August, guards were posted outside a seized Tehran church to keep worshipers out.

Last week, Lida Alexani, a 58-year-old grandmother and wife of Iranian-Armenian pastor Joseph Shahbazian, was summoned to begin a 13-year sentence for “deviant proselytizing contrary to the holy religion of Islam.” Her husband is already serving a 16-year sentence for leading a house church. The couple and three converts in the same case were collectively sentenced to more than 70 years.




Iran's reported missile test puts Israel on alert


Iran's reported missile test puts Israel on alert


Reports in Arab media that Iran launched at least 30 ballistic missiles of two different types during an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps exercise earlier this week have raised serious concerns in Israel. The reported drill has prompted the Israeli military to heighten its alert level while maintaining maximum readiness for a targeted strike against Iran.

Israel is not only watching with concern as Iran replenishes its missile stockpiles, as recently reported by Bloomberg, but is also preparing for the possibility that an Iranian military exercise could turn into a real attack.

Alongside fears of a miscalculation that could trigger a broader conflict, direct discussions between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump suggest that another strike against Iran remains under consideration. Trump himself has raised the possibility on several occasions over the past week.

The Israel Defense Forces has raised its alert level across all fronts. During a visit to the IDF's Central Command on Wednesday, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir warned that the risk of escalation was growing. "Given the numerous warnings across all fronts and the sensitivity of the current period, the potential for escalation has increased," Zamir said. "To ensure better operational control on the ground, we have reinforced our troop deployments across all sectors, including moving the 98th Division into the area to strengthen security and stability."


"We have reinforced our forces and raised our level of readiness, and we continue to prepare for attempts to catch us by surprise," he added. "During this sensitive period, we must remain vigilant and prepared on every front, preserve our freedom of action and swiftly thwart threats. We pursue and combat terrorism wherever it exists. The IDF is at a high level of readiness to launch large-scale offensive operations against any party that attempts to harm Israeli civilians."

After the Americans managed to increase tanker traffic through the strait in September to nearly prewar levels, they are now facing the need to take preventive military action against Iranian attacks. Such an operation could take place in the coming days. The anticipated strikes would be limited and targeted, focusing on radar installations, missile launchers and observation posts used to detect vessels passing through the waterway.


Iran has stepped up its attacks in the Strait of Hormuz while also assisting the Houthis around the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, another strategically vital shipping route at the southern entrance to the Red Sea. The apparent objective is to drive up oil prices in the US, potentially influencing the outcome of November's midterm elections.


Israeli assessments indicate that US strikes in the Strait of Hormuz would not have immediate repercussions for Israel unless they triggered a significant escalation. In that scenario, Iranian leaders could decide to deploy their recovering ballistic missile arsenal against additional targets in the Gulf states.

Beyond the Gulf, Israel is also closely monitoring developments along its northern front with Lebanon.

The Next Best Thing:


The Next Best Thing



What is the next thing you are looking forward to? The wedding of a child? The birth of another grandchild? A long-anticipated trip or family gathering?

All of those blessed events are bound to inspire eager anticipation. But the best thing that Christians throughout the Church Age have awaited with great excitement is the Rapture of the Church. That is why Paul refers to His coming for us as our “blessed hope.” As we’ve said many times, because our Hope is bound up in the Person of Jesus Christ and His trustworthy promises, the phrase Blessed Hope refers both to Him personally and to the promise that He will come and gather us to Himself.

It is that upward call that will usher us in glorified bodies into the rarefied beauty of Heaven—to take up residence in the place He has prepared for us—that Paul says we should be groaning for. In fact, he assumes that every Christian is doing just that: “having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our body” (Romans 8:23).

Paul advocated for what I refer to as an “already, but not yet” realization of our salvation. Yes, we are saved the moment we trust in Christ. But still, we await the glorification of our bodies, our minds, and our hearts. “For in hope we have been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he already sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it” (Romans 8:24-25).

Jesus Christ, who is our Savior in accordance with the eternal will of God, is also our Hope.


Are You Hoping for the Blessed Hope?

Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians is the clearest scriptural reference to the Rapture, but it is not the only one. The concept of the “Rapture” is contained in 1 Thessalonians 4:17 where the word is typically translated as “caught up.” In the original Greek, the word harpázō was used. That word appears 14 times in Scripture and conveys the idea of being seized, snatched away, plucked up, or carried off by force. For example:

Late in the 4th century, Jerome translated the Greek New Testament into the Latin Vulgate (“vulgar” or common tongue spoken by most Roman citizens). He used the future tense of the Latin verb rapio, rendering it as rapiēmur—meaning “we shall be caught up.”


If Paul’s Spirit-revealed reference to what we call the Rapture was the only one, it would still be a clear and valid prophecy. But other Scriptures reference this promise to the Church: “Jesus said, ‘I will come again and receive you to Myself, that where I am going (to prepare a place for you) you may be also’ “ (John 14:1-4).

Paul revealed, “Behold, I tell you a mystery; we will not all sleep, but we will all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet; for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed” (1 Corinthians 15:51-52).

The context of Paul’s statement makes clear that he is referring to “the dead in Christ” (to use the language of 1 Thessalonians 4:16). And, while some get hung up on the nature of the “last trumpet,” it is the final trumpet those who have been redeemed will hear with our mortal ears—even as other trumpets will sound in Heaven and during the Tribulation. I don’t believe the unsaved will hear that particular trumpet, but those with “ears to hear” will hear the wonderful shout of the archangel and blast of that trumpet that will announce Christ Himself descending to collect His Bride.

Jesus is the Bridegroom who is waiting for His Father to say, “Go, and get Your Bride.” Any man who has awaited his wedding day can testify that the sense of anticipation and joyful excitement begins at the engagement and mounts as the wedding day draws near. The same was true with a Jewish betrothal, although the timing of the actual wedding was undetermined (and unknowable) until the father decided it was time.

As she awaits the wedding day, every bride also experiences growing expectation and hope. Her hope is not a forlorn wish, but an assurance of a life to be united and shared with the bridegroom. That is why brides used to gather treasured belongings in a hope chest—readying them for use in her future home and family.

It is almost unimaginable to think of a bride who would be apathetic about her impending wedding. And yet, many in the Bride of Christ seem unconcerned and indifferent about the joy that awaits when our Bridegroom comes to snatch us away, gathering us to Himself in the blink of an eye.

Oh, what a joy-filled day that will be! But that is only the beginning of the glories and joys that await us according to Bible prophecy.


More...