Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Bab el-Mandeb Strait: Why the Red Sea passage is referred to as 'Hormuz 2.0'


Bab el-Mandeb Strait: Why the Red Sea passage is referred to as 'Hormuz 2.0'

Much of the world’s attention has been focused on the Strait of Hormuz, due to the Iran conflict and the increase in energy prices following its closure by the Iranian regime. Around 20% of the world’s naval traffic passes through the Strait. 

However, another waterway has also come into focus following recent tensions between the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen and Saudi Arabia. That waterway is the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which connects the Gulf of Aden, south of the Arabian Peninsula, with the Red Sea.

Like the Strait of Hormuz, the Bab el-Mandeb is one of the world's busiest maritime chokepoints, carrying about 4.8 million barrels of oil per day, significant volumes of Qatari liquefied natural gas, and roughly 10–12% of global shipping traffic, or about 19,000 vessels each year.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) had previously threatened to close off the Bab el-Mandeb Strait as part of its attempt to weaponize the Hormuz, following the U.S.-Israeli air campaign launched on Feb. 28.

Iran’s ability to threaten both Hormuz and – via the Houthis – Bab el-Mandeb raises the economic stakes of the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran.  

At its narrowest point, the Bab el-Mandeb ["Gate of Tears" in Arabic] waterway is only around 26 kilometers (16 miles) wide, functioning as a natural chokepoint between Djibouti and the Houthi-controlled territory in Yemen. 

Bab el-Mandeb is the only direct route from the Gulf of Aden to the Suez Canal, making it the fastest shipping route from Asia to Europe. It is also the only route for crude oil shipped from Saudi Arabia's Red Sea port of Yanbu to Asia. The Suez Canal accounts for about 2% of Egypt's gross domestic product, generating around $10 billion in revenue in 2022–2023, before the start of the Gaza war.

While the Houthis lack the ability to completely shut down the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the threat of attacks would likely force most shipping to bypass the waterway and the Suez Canal, depriving Egypt of significant revenue. Together with the Strait of Hormuz, the effective closure of both waterways would allow a single entity – the Islamic Republic of Iran– to disrupt roughly 30% of the global oil and gas supply.

Following recent Houthi drone strikes on Saudi oil facilities and an announced blockade of Saudi ships passing through the Red Sea, many feared the Iranians were attempting to act on that threat, raising fresh concerns about global energy supplies and trade. 

After the start of U.S. and Israeli military operations against Iran, Saudi Arabia began diverting some of its oil exports through Yanbu following the IRGC's closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Closing the Bab el-Mandeb would force tankers and container ships heading to and from Europe and Asia to divert around the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa, adding weeks to the delivery times, as demonstrated in late 2023, after the Houthis targeted commercial shipping in the Red Sea.

The Houthis said the attacks were carried out in solidarity with Hamas after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel.

However, due to the security risks, multiple shipping companies abandoned the route, opting instead for the longer journey around the African continent. The rerouting caused a relatively minor inconvenience for Israel but dealt a significant financial blow to Egypt, which reported an almost 66% decline in Suez Canal traffic, according to the Egyptian government.

More....


Netanyahu says Israel ‘didn’t agree’ to Board of Peace’s terms for disarming Hamas


Netanyahu says Israel ‘didn’t agree’ to Board of Peace’s terms for disarming Hamas


In his first public comments on the matter, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday that Israel has not agreed to the Board of Peace’s Hamas disarmament plan, which was accepted by the terror group last week.

Reiterating comments from recent days attributed to “senior Israeli officials,” Netanyahu said in a video posted to Facebook that Israel will not withdraw “from our current lines” in Gaza “until Hamas is completely disarmed.”

This would appear to go against the disarmament plan, which requires Israel to pull back to the original Yellow Line in Gaza. Israel withdrew to that line as part of the October 2025 ceasefire-hostage release deal with Hamas, but has since expanded its control of the Strip from 53 percent to over 60%.

While the Board of Peace indicated that Israel would not have to carry out withdrawals beyond the original Yellow Line until Hamas at least begins to hand over its weapons, Netanyahu asserted that Israeli forces will not move at all, as his election campaign kicks into gear.

“[US] President [Donald] Trump thinks — or his team thinks — that they can get Hamas to disarm and demilitarize Gaza. We are looking into it. They sent us a draft. We did not agree to it. It was not our draft. We sent back our comments,” Netanyahu said in the video statement.

The “draft” Netanyahu described was not supposed to be open for debate with Israel, as it was the result of separate negotiations between Hamas, the Trump-controlled Board of Peace and mediating countries Egypt, Qatar, Turkey and the US.

A senior US official briefing reporters last week said the disarmament proposal is an extension of Trump’s 20-point plan for ending the Gaza war, which Israel already accepted last fall. Accordingly, Israel is only being asked to maintain its adherence to the 20-point plan, the US official said, adding that Trump would be “very disappointed” in Jerusalem if it blocked the proposal’s advancement.

However, with Israel seemingly opposed to the proposal, the Board of Peace’s top envoys visited Jerusalem to meet with Netanyahu on Monday in a bid to bring him on board.

That effort did not appear to bear fruit, though, as the Board of Peace subsequently indicated that it may reopen the terms of the deal for deliberation, issuing a statement that suggested it was changing the terms of the Israeli withdrawal in Jerusalem’s favor.

But agreeing to Israel’s demands to amend the disarmament proposal risks losing the support of Hamas, which took months to secure.

Along with a withdrawal to the original Yellow Line, the plan requires Israel to immediately halt all military operations in Gaza once it enters into force. While Israel has pushed back on this condition, it did reportedly agree to tighten the rules of engagement in Gaza, requiring the approval of the IDF chief of staff before any single strike can go ahead.

Netanyahu did not deny that policy change in his video statement, but insisted, “We are instructing IDF soldiers to do whatever is necessary to defend themselves, defend our territory and defend people.”

More...

A Dangerous Deal: Trump's Board of Peace and Hamas


A Dangerous Deal: Trump's Board of Peace and Hamas
  • The original goal of Trump's peace plan was not to relocate Hamas's arsenal. It was to eliminate it permanently.

  • Weapons stored in warehouses remain weapons that function. Explosives stored today can be easily recovered tomorrow. Rocket factories that are preserved can resume production. Tunnels that are mapped rather than destroyed can be used again.

  • The issue has never been where Hamas keeps its weapons. The issue has always been Hamas having access them.

  • Transferring weapons from one Palestinian group to another is notdemilitarization.

  • Even more disturbing is the new deal's assertion that "no weapons shall be transferred or handed to Israel or non-Palestinian parties."

  • Equally disturbing is the new roadmap's conditioning of disarmament on an Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip....

  • Why should a terrorist organization that carried out the October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel be allowed to dictate the conditions of its own disarmament? No country fighting ISIS or al-Qaeda would first withdraw its forces and only then hope terrorists voluntarily surrender their weapons. Hamas should not be negotiating the terms of its defeat. It should be compelled to unconditionally surrender and disarm.

  • This is the same Ghazi Hamad [senior Hamas official] who publicly vowed that Hamas would repeat the October 7 massacre time and again until Israel is eliminated: "The Al-Aqsa Flood [the name Hamas uses to describe the October 7 massacre] is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth, because we have the determination, the resolve, and the capabilities to fight."

  • Anyone who thinks that the newly established NCAG will somehow confront Hamas and impose its authority over the terrorist organization is living under an illusion.

  • The far more likely scenario is that Hamas will continue to call the shots from behind the scenes while allowing another Palestinian body to assume responsibility for governance, civil service salaries, reconstruction, and collecting international aid.

  • This would essentially replicate the Hezbollah model in Lebanon, where a heavily-armed Iran-backed terrorist militia coexists with a formal government while retaining independent military power and ultimate political influence.

  • Within hours of the announcement of the roadmap, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps dismissed the plan outright, declaring... that "the resistance" (Hamas) would remain steadfast until what it called the "final victory" over Israel.

  • Iran understands Hamas better than anyone else because it has financed, armed and trained the terrorist organization for decades. If the Iranian regime is openly rejecting the prospect of Hamas's disarmament, why should anyone else believe that Hamas intends to honor the agreement?

    More....

Strong and shallow M6.3 earthquake hits Mindanao, Philippines, 6.3 Quake Hits Kermadec Islands


Strong and shallow M6.3 earthquake hits Mindanao, Philippines


A strong and shallow earthquake registered by the USGS as M6.3 struck Mindanao, Philippines, at 04:14 UTC (12:14 LT) on August 5, 2026. The agency is reporting a depth of 10 km (6.2 miles). EMSC is reporting M6.3 at a depth of 35 km (21.7 miles).

The epicenter was located 32 km (20 miles) SW of Sarangani (population 7 506), 72 km (45 miles) S of Glan (population 24 256), 88 km (54 miles) S of Malapatan (population 19 439), 91 km (57 miles) SSW of Caburan (population 12 618), and 155 km (96 miles) SSE of Koronadal (population 195 398), Philippines.

15 000 people are estimated to have felt strong shaking, 88 000 moderate, and 5.4 million light. Approximately 600 000 people are estimated to have felt weak shaking.


The USGS issued a Green alert for shaking-related fatalities and economic losses. There is a low likelihood of casualties and damage.


Overall, the population in this region resides in structures that are a mix of vulnerable and earthquake-resistant construction. The predominant vulnerable building types are unknown/miscellaneous types and heavy wood frame construction, according to USGS.


Recent earthquakes in this area have caused secondary hazards such as landslides that might have contributed to losses.


The earthquake struck the same general area affected by the destructive M7.8 Offshore Sarangani earthquake on June 8, 2026. That event was followed by M6.1, M6.0, and M6.5 earthquakes within approximately 80 minutes.


Additional strong earthquakes struck the area on June 26 (M6.5) and July 14 (M6.2), with the July 14 epicenter located approximately 19 km (12 miles) from the August 5 epicenter, according to current USGS.



M6.3 earthquake hits south of the Kermadec Islands

Rishav Kothari



A strong earthquake registered by the USGS as M6.3 struck south of the Kermadec Islands at 07:43 UTC on August 5, 2026. The agency is reporting a depth of 226.1 km (140.5 miles). EMSC is reporting M6.3 at a depth of 226 km (140.4 miles). The USGS issued a Green alert for shaking-related fatalities and economic losses.


The epicenter was located 435 km (270 miles) NNE of Hicks Bay (population 1 389), 513 km (318 miles) NNE of Whakatane (population 18 602), 516 km (321 miles) ENE of Whangarei (population 50 900), 524 km (326 miles) NNE of Tauranga (population 155 200), and 531 km (330 miles) NE of Orewa (population 11 790), New Zealand.

The USGS issued a Green alert for shaking-related fatalities and economic losses. There is a low likelihood of casualties and damage.




Guatemala’s Fuego volcano erupts, red alert issued after evacuations


Guatemala’s Fuego volcano erupts, red alert issued after evacuations
Sweden Herald

Guatemala's Fuego volcano has erupted. Hundreds of people have been evacuated after large amounts of lava poured out and flowed down the volcano's slopes.A red alert, the highest, has been issued in Guatemala and applies to three areas southwest of the capital, Guatemala City, according to the emergency services.

The Fuego volcano is Central America's most active volcano and its eruption began on Monday morning local time.

"You are always on guard because the volcano does not give any warning," says Lidia Ortiz, an evacuated resident.

The country's Institute of Volcanology is warning nearby communities on the western and southern sides of the volcano of the risks of "volcanic material."