Thursday, September 24, 2026

Trump courts Xi in Washington, Beijing's price could be Taiwan


Trump courts Xi in Washington, Beijing's price could be Taiwan


Hours before Chinese President Xi Jinping's plane landed Thursday night at Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington, where President Donald Trump waited for him on the tarmac, another plane touched down in Guangzhou, in southern China. It was a flight operated by Iran's Mahan Air from Tehran. It landed on the same day American sanctions aimed at grounding Iran's airlines worldwide took effect.

A number of countries in the region fell in line with that American demand, among them Azerbaijan, Turkey, Oman and Iraq. China did not. "We consistently oppose illegal unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said earlier.

The stakes behind that defiance are considerable. According to a Wall Street Journal investigation published Thursday, Iranian customs data show roughly 1,300 shipments of dual-use components from China to Iran's Defense Ministry in the first half of the year, including parts for drones and missile guidance systems. Even so, the paper reported, Trump instructed senior White House officials to work to preserve good relations with Xi.

Trump made no secret of his enthusiasm for the reception he received in Beijing, having called the honor ceremony held there "amazing," and he staged a similar production of his own. In recent weeks he had boasted that the White House's new helicopter landing pad, a "work of art" in his words, would be ready for the visit, while lamenting that the sprawling new ballroom would not be finished in time.

Breaking from his usual custom of receiving foreign leaders at the White House, the president waited for Xi at the airfield alongside First Lady Melania Trump, underscoring the effort he is investing in honoring the Chinese leader. The Trumps walked hand in hand to the foot of the plane's stairs and shook hands with Xi and his wife, Peng Liyuan, as an honor guard lined the red carpet. Two B-1 bombers roared overhead while the national anthems of both countries played.

On Thursday, Xi is set to be received in an official White House ceremony, followed that evening by a state dinner in his honor whose guests include Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Elon Musk. Notably absent will be most of the CEOs of China's own tech giants. According to the South China Morning Post, their inclusion in the delegation ran into disputes between Washington and Beijing over Chinese investment in the US, pouring cold water on the American president's hopes for fresh capital. The Iran issue and AI are also expected on the agenda.

Melania Trump released the details of the presidential dinner, whose menu features "American ingredients with a subtle Chinese influence" and opens with a toast of Schramsberg "Blanc de Noirs," a nod to President Richard Nixon's 1972 "toast for peace" with Premier Zhou Enlai in Beijing, the first visit by a sitting American president to the Asian empire and the moment that ended 25 years of diplomatic estrangement between the two nations. The gesture may also be a bid to soften Xi ahead of a difficult conversation.

On the surface, little has changed since Trump's Beijing visit four months ago. The war grinds on, and China, the largest buyer of Iranian oil, keeps propping up Iran's economy. The Taiwan arms deal, a record $14 billion, remains frozen since the May summit but still functions as a bargaining chip. The AI race has only intensified, and the tariff-war ceasefire remains fragile.


Trump had hoped to end the war, which began in late February, even during his Beijing trip, but it has since become a genuine millstone around his neck. With the midterm elections roughly a month and a half away, Americans increasingly link the war to the surge in the cost of living, a failure Democrats have been quick to seize on.

"China sees the president as weaker than when he traveled to Beijing in May," Edgard Kagan, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, wrote this week. "The ongoing war in Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, with no reasonable path to resolution, have distracted Trump and damaged American credibility around the world," he added. "China is closely watching the decline in the president's popularity in the six weeks before the midterm elections, and hopes that will encourage him to avoid friction with Beijing," he said.


Xi is navigating his own turbulence. A sweeping military purge culminated in an investigation into Zhang Youxia, the military's number two and a former close ally, formally expelled from the party and the army this week, on top of a faltering economy and recurring rumors about the Chinese leader's health. "Like Trump, his political standing, too, would benefit from a stable international environment, which depends heavily on maintaining calm with Washington," wrote Scott Kennedy, also of CSIS.

Where the two leaders' previous meeting centered on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and blocking Iran's path to nuclear weapons, Washington has spent recent weeks instead trying to squeeze Iran economically.

Alongside the naval blockade, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has announced an "economic offensive" against Tehran's financial ties worldwide, now paired with the grounding of Iran's airlines, making China, a key economic partner of Tehran, more relevant than ever. Asked Thursday night whether he would raise the issue with Xi, Trump replied, "We'll see. We'll see. I'll talk about that and a lot of other things."

The price China extracts in return may be Taiwan. The island, which has functioned as a de facto state since 1949, is viewed by Beijing as a "renegade province" whose unification with the mainland ranks as its top national priority. In a statement released after the May summit, China said Xi had told Trump plainly that Taiwan is "the most important issue in China-US relations," warning that mishandling it would push the two countries "to clashes and even confrontations."

Taiwan and Iran may dominate the headlines, but it is quite possible that other forces will ultimately shape this superpower rivalry, chief among them the race for AI supremacy, now the subject of fierce debate over both its pace and its risks. "We can't stop, because the Chinese won't stop," said Bessent, who is expected to lead that dialogue with Beijing. "If China wins this, there's no day after tomorrow."

Washington has imposed export restrictions making it harder for China to obtain the most advanced chips from companies like Nvidia, pushing Chinese chipmakers to race to close the gap.

Beijing, for its part, wields leverage of its own, dominating the production of rare earth metals essential to robotics, electric vehicles and advanced weapons. It flexed that power last year by restricting exports during the tariff war and has since resumed some shipments, though Washington complains they are still being delayed.


The White House may once have envisioned détente during Trump's tenure, a genuine thaw with China echoing the one achieved with the Soviet Union, including nuclear arms limits Trump is eager to pursue with Beijing. But China consistently refuses talks on limiting its arsenal, and it appears that in the end the two sides will settle for avoiding confrontation – and give up on warming relations.


The Resting Place Of Noah’s Ark Has Been Discovered, And Scientists Are About To Prove It


The Resting Place Of Noah’s Ark Has Been Discovered, And Scientists Are About To Prove It


The remains of Noah’s Ark are contained in the Durupinar formation in the Mountains of Ararat. I have no doubt about this. The boat-shaped Durupinar formation has the exact same dimensions that the Bible says that Noah’s Ark had. Ground-penetrating radar has confirmed that the ship that is buried there has corridors, compartments and three distinct levels. Needless to say, the Bible says that the Ark was built with lower, middle, and upper levels. There are perfect right angles inside the formation that could not have been produced naturally. What I have shared so far is just the tip of the iceberg, because there is so much more evidence. So how did an absolutely enormous three level ship that is roughly the size of a World War I-era aircraft carrier end up so far away from any major body of water in the Mountains of Ararat?

That is a very good question.

If you do not believe in Noah’s Ark, that will be exceedingly difficult for you to explain.

Skeptics are scrambling to come up with some sort of a theory that might work, because for most of them it is unthinkable to concede that the Bible is historically accurate.

Yesterday, the Daily Mail published an article that claimed that the resting place of Noah’s Ark has been 100 percent confirmed.

In response, one of the organizations that is involved with the scientific work that is going on at the Durupinar formation stated that “knowing what we know now, we are also 100% sure that they are not going to have to issue a retraction”…

So how can they be so confident?

An international team of researchers, geologists and archaeologists has been conducting an unprecedented scientific investigation of the Durupinar formation, and they are extremely excited about what they have found so far…

For centuries, travelers passed through these mountains.

With Mount Ararat rising behind the Durupınar formation, this region became an ancient crossroads between east and west, a route later traveled by merchants, pilgrims and travelers along the Silk Road.

And according to ancient traditions, some of those pilgrims came here because they believed the Ark had come to rest in these mountains.

There are even accounts of travelers taking pieces of wood from the Ark as sacred relics, pieces that were later preserved in churches and monasteries.

Today, the story is being investigated in a very different way.

Instead of simply collecting relics, our team is collecting data.

Radar. Core drilling. Soil samples. Geological analysis.

Generations of people have come looking for Noah’s Ark.

Now we’re using modern science to investigate what remains beneath the surface.


For years, researchers were prevented from doing this sort of work by Turkish authorities.

But now permission has been granted, and the team is being led by a couple of prominent Turkish professors…

The 2026 field program is led by Turkish Professor of Archaeology Prof. Dr. Cenker Atila of Sivas Cumhuriyet University and supported by Prof. Dr. Ahmet Şengönül, Rector of Sivas Cumhuriyet University with Noah’s Ark Scan’s Andrew Jones serving as Vice President of the Noah’s Ark Research Project. This Scientific Expedition is being conducted with official authorization from relevant Turkish government agencies. The Durupınar formation is a 157-meter (515-foot) boat-shaped feature first identified in 1959 by Turkish Army Capt. İlhan Durupınar.

Never before have researchers been allowed to drill deep into the Durupinar formation to collect core samples.

According to Andrew Jones, at one point they were forced to stop drilling because they “struck a layer so hard that the drill bit broke”…

“For the first time in history, we are performing an extensive, permitted deep core drilling survey inside and outside the Durupınar Noah’s Ark site, recovering samples from depths of up to 18 meters, nearly 60 feet. We have so far recovered layers of rich organic material that we believe could be the decayed top tier remains of the Ark. We are encountering multiple cavities, including one filled with mud and water. No bedrock or solid limestone has so far been identified in the holes drilled inside the formation. These current findings challenge claims that this is simply a natural shape made of limestone or bedrock.

“In one of the holes drilled inside the boat, approximately 4–5 meters below the surface, The drilling system had already penetrated the overlying material, but at this layer, the operation stopped as we struck a layer so hard that the drill bit broke. Petrified or highly mineralized wood are both a possibility we want to investigate through third party lab testing.”


In addition to the core drilling that is being done, the team also intends to insert an underground exploration drone into “voids, tunnels, and corridors previously mapped by ground-penetrating radar”…

Second, researchers plan to insert the custom-built GOPHER underground exploration drone into voids, tunnels, and corridors previously mapped by ground-penetrating radar, electrical resistivity tomography, and related surveys. GOPHER, named for the “gopher wood” of Genesis, is equipped with a high-resolution camera, designed to enter narrow borehole access points without opening large excavation trenches.

That drone should be able to give us a tremendous amount of information.

In fact, I believe that what that drone reveals will shock the entire world.

Prior to all of this, months of important work has been going on at the Durupinar formation…


The drilling campaign follows months of baseline work at the site, including precision GPS mapping, three-dimensional digital modeling, soil sampling inside and outside the outline, and high-resolution subsurface imaging. Earlier scans identified linear features, right-angle intersections, layered anomalies, and elongated voids interpreted by the team as possible corridors and chamber-like spaces. U.S. Defense Scientist Dr. Khrosrow Bakthar, recently deployed BaktharRadar at the site and provided the core drilling coordinates to the Noah’s Ark 2026 expedition team. Dr. Bakthar’s preliminary report found no bedrock at the site, more details of the prestigious scientist’s report are expected to be released by Noah’s Ark Scans later this week.





Jewish life in Germany ‘no longer safe,’ chancellor warns as far-left wins ‘election intifada’ in Berlin


Jewish life in Germany ‘no longer safe,’ chancellor warns as far-left wins ‘election intifada’ in Berlin


With Jewish life under fire across the world, two consecutive state election victories by Germany’s far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) have justifiably drawn attention.

However, the most serious harm to Jewish life in Germany could well come from last weekend’s victory by the far-left Die Linke (The Left) in the capital Berlin. Leaders from across the political spectrum, Jewish community leaders and the Israeli ambassador are sounding the alarm about what they describe as extreme anti-Israeli and antisemitic positions within the party.

Die Linke, the successor of the SED party that led East Germany’s dictatorship until reunification in 1990, won the Berlin city-state elections on Sunday with 25.7% of the vote, defeating the traditional largest parties, CDU and SPD, by significant margins.

If Die Linke can convince the center-left SPD and the Green Party to join a coalition, it could rule a unified Berlin for the first time. The city has the largest Jewish community in Germany, with around 50,000 people, which includes thousands of Israeli expats.

The German capital has been at the center of anti-Israel protests since Oct. 7, 2023. The protests have often included clashes with the police and have been dominated by the city’s growing Arabic- and Muslim-background population, as well as its large population of left-wing radicals.

The party’s campaign explicitly targeted these groups. In a recent example, the candidate Basem Said urged his voters to wage an “election intifada,” while accusing the centrist parties of “enforcing the same racist consensus." He continued, "They have suppressed our civil rights, normalized anti-Arab demonization, actively supported the [Israeli] genocide, and voted for arms smuggling to the Israeli regime.”

“Vote for the Left. Stand fearlessly for the rights of migrants and the liberation of Palestine,” Said urged voters. His campaign slogan is: “For Neukölln. For migration. For Palestine.”

The already latently antisemitic Die Linke has seen rapid changes over the past years. “The party has been infiltrated in recent years,” explained Israeli-Arab extremism expert Ahmad Mansour in an interview with Focus.


German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, whose CDU has now been trounced in multiple successive state elections, lamented, “The fact that Jewish life is no longer safe in Germany is the heaviest burden of recent years.”

“The CDU, and I personally, are committed to doing everything possible to ensure that Jewish life in Germany, and here in the capital, Berlin, is safe,” Merz said, vowing to Jewish communities in Berlin and worldwide that what has become possible in Berlin’s streets “is a disgrace for Germany, and I will do everything in my power to bring it under control and push it back.”


More...

US To Establish Two New Military Bases In Greenland


What's Really In The Text Of Trump's Landmark Deal With Greenland

The United States plans to open two new military bases in Greenland, an expansion made possible by a new security agreement between the US, Denmark, and the semi-autonomous Danish territory of Greenland.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, and Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen signed the new security agreement during a trilateral ceremony at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.


The "agreement," which amends a 1951 defense treaty, allows the US "to establish an additional Defense Area at Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig in accordance with modalities and technical details to be mutually agreed by the Parties," which is where the two new military bases will be created.

Narsarsuaq hosted the US Bluie West One military base in the 1940s and 1950s. Mestersvig is a current military outpost used by the Danish special forces unit called Sirius Dog Sled Patrol.

The agreement also allows the US to "modernize and expand its activities" at its existing Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, create additional military facilities on the island, and enjoy greater military access by land, air, and sea.

It also bans non-NATO nations from establishing a military presence on Greenland and provides the U.S. with economic privileges (such as “minerals cooperation”) in the resource-rich island.

During a speech to assembled world leaders at the UN before the trilateral ceremony, Trump spoke of the "unprecedented agreement regarding the northern frontier of North America, the large and strategically vital piece of land known as Greenland."

This rhetoric tracked with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s vow in March to establish a "Greater North America." However, the agreement does not have the US take over Greenland, as leaders on the island, in Denmark, and throughout Europe had feared earlier this year.

Such fears were well placed, considering that the US conquered Venezuela in January, has been working toward regime change in Cuba, and is currently at war with Iran.

What's in the actual Greenland deal text? Analysis in the following: "The Danes lied the most: Trump is pretty much correct in saying that this new deal grants the US control of Greenland"...

Geopolitical commentator Arnaud Bertrand's breakdown of the official text and the implications:

1) This is now a permanent arrangement: whereas the existing 1951 deal only lasted as long as NATO existed, this one "does not have an end date and may only be amended by mutual consent." It even survives a hypothetical future independence of Greenland: in that event, Denmark and Greenland must ensure that the independent Greenlandic state "affirmatively assume[s] all of the rights and obligations of the Kingdom of Denmark specified in this Agreement."

2) In the 1951 agreement, the US could set up bases only where both governments agreed, and only on the basis of NATO planning. The new deal locks in three bases: the US can "modernize and expand its activities" at Pituffik, its only base in Greenland until now, and "shall be allowed to establish an additional Defense Area at Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig." Further bases beyond these 3 can be justified by the defense of "the American continent," a US interest rather than a NATO one.

Also, quite subtle but this is interesting: Article IV(iii) says that "the United States may establish additional defense areas in Greenland" and that consultations are then held "to decide implementation details based on mutual agreement." What this means is that the principle of a new base is automatically granted and only the implementation details require agreement.

3) On US military movement across Greenland, the wording change between the 1951 agreement and this new one is quite funny. The 1951 text said (Art. V(3)): the US "may enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the defense areas through Greenland, including territorial waters, by land, air and sea," but only "in accordance with general rules mutually agreed upon and issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The new one says: "the United States of America shall enjoy... the right of free access to and movement between the Defense Areas through Greenland, including the Territorial Waters, by land, air and sea." That's it: "May" becomes "shall," and the US military movement no longer has to follow rules "issued by the appropriate Danish authority in Greenland." The US also gets something new on top: "undersea access to and movement within the Territorial Waters," i.e. submarines.

4) Non-NATO exclusion: non-NATO states are barred from military installations or a persistent presence in Greenland unless all three parties approve, giving the US an effective permanent veto. The 1951 deal had no equivalent clause.

More....




The Houthis Have Saudi Arabia Trapped Between Two Chokepoints


The Houthis Have Saudi Arabia Trapped Between Two Chokepoints


The Houthis have not technically seized the entire Red Sea, but that distinction is becoming almost meaningless for Saudi Arabia. Their forces have swept down Yemen’s western coastline, taking Mokha, Dhubab, the Hanish islands, and most importantly Mayyun, also known as Perim, sitting directly inside the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. They now control nearly the entire Yemeni coastline along the Red Sea and possess something far more valuable than territory. They have acquired leverage over one of the most important maritime chokepoints on Earth.

This is becoming an economic nightmare for Saudi Arabia because geography cannot be negotiated away. The Saudis traditionally relied heavily on the Strait of Hormuz to move oil eastward toward Asia. When Hormuz became increasingly dangerous, Riyadh shifted more crude through its East-West pipeline across Saudi Arabia to Yanbu on the Red Sea. That was the escape route. Oil could bypass Hormuz, load at Yanbu, sail south through Bab el-Mandeb, and reach Asian customers. Now the Houthis are sitting at the other door.

Saudi Arabia is therefore confronting the nightmare of being squeezed between TWO strategic chokepoints. Iran can threaten Hormuz while the Iran-aligned Houthis can threaten Bab el-Mandeb. Saudi Arabia built the East-West pipeline precisely to reduce its dependence on Hormuz, but geography has now transformed the Red Sea alternative into another vulnerability. You could not design a more dangerous strategic position for an oil exporting nation.

The shipping data already reflects the fear. Traffic through Bab el-Mandeb fell by half immediately after the Houthi seizure of Perim, from 30 vessels in one day to just 15 the next. Large crude carriers have been particularly reluctant to enter the strait. This is the part politicians never understand. The Houthis do not actually have to sink every tanker or formally “close” the waterway. They merely have to make the risk sufficiently expensive that insurers, shipowners, and charterers refuse to go there.

That is how modern economic warfare works. You do not need a naval blockade when the insurance market will create one for you.

Saudi tankers leaving Yanbu can instead sail NORTH toward the Suez Canal. But oil destined for Asia then faces an absurd journey. Some vessels must enter the Mediterranean, pass Gibraltar, travel down the entire western coast of Africa, round the Cape of Good Hope, and then sail back across the Indian Ocean. AP reported that the journey to South Korea can increase from roughly 24 days to 54 days. Tankers can cost tens of thousands of dollars PER DAY to charter, and rates during this energy crisis have in some cases exceeded $100,000 per day.

This is inflation being manufactured geopolitically in real time. Every additional day at sea means fuel, insurance, crews, financing, and charter costs. Those costs eventually appear somewhere in the price structure. Politicians will then blame “greedy corporations” when energy prices rise while ignoring the fact that their geopolitical adventures have transformed the world’s shipping lanes into war zones.

Saudi Arabia’s vulnerability extends far beyond tankers. The Houthis have attacked Saudi energy infrastructure and announced what they call a maritime embargo on Saudi-linked shipping. Riyadh temporarily shut its East-West pipeline after an attack in September. Saudi Arabia then reportedly appealed to China for help, and Reuters reported that Beijing subsequently pressed Iran to restrain the Houthis. That is perhaps the most revealing development of all.

Saudi Arabia is asking China to help influence Iran. That tells you how dramatically the geopolitical chessboard has changed. China is one of the world’s largest energy consumers. It needs Gulf oil. Beijing therefore has an enormous economic interest in keeping both Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb functioning. The United States once dominated every major diplomatic conversation in the Middle East. Now Riyadh is turning toward Beijing because China has relationships with both Saudi Arabia and Iran and possesses economic leverage Washington simply does not have in the same form.

This is precisely what happens when sanctions and endless wars fragment the world economy. Trade routes change. Alliances change. Capital flows change. Countries begin looking for alternative partners because survival always comes before ideology.

The Houthis have also demonstrated something that should terrify every major military establishment. You no longer need an enormous blue-water navy to threaten global commerce. Cheap drones, missiles, mines, and control of the coastline can impose tremendous economic costs on ships worth hundreds of millions of dollars. A relatively poor armed movement sitting beside the correct piece of geography can influence the price of energy across the entire world.

Bab el-Mandeb means the “Gate of Tears.” That name is becoming rather appropriate. This is not simply another chapter in Yemen’s civil war. The Houthis have acquired strategic leverage over the southern entrance to the Red Sea while Iran retains leverage over Hormuz. Between those two chokepoints sits Saudi Arabia and an enormous portion of the world’s energy infrastructure.


Bab el-Mandeb means the “Gate of Tears.” That name is becoming rather appropriate. This is not simply another chapter in Yemen’s civil war. The Houthis have acquired strategic leverage over the southern entrance to the Red Sea while Iran retains leverage over Hormuz. Between those two chokepoints sits Saudi Arabia and an enormous portion of the world’s energy infrastructure.

Saudi Arabia is certainly not cut off. Oil will continue moving. Markets always find another route. But every alternative becomes longer, more expensive, and more dangerous. You do not need to stop world trade to create an economic crisis. You merely need to make world trade expensive enough.