Thursday, October 8, 2026

Houthi strike hits passenger plane at Riyadh's main airport





A passenger plane has been hit by Houthi fire at King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh, Reuters reported Thursday, citing footage that circulated on social media.

According to the report, the aircraft was empty and parked at a terminal gate when it was apparently struck by a ballistic missile fired from Yemen. The Saudis said they intercepted two ballistic missiles launched at the kingdom earlier in the day. The strike disrupted air traffic at the busiest airport in Saudi Arabia.

The Saudi government said Wednesday that Houthi attacks had struck both King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh and Abha International Airport in the country's south. Yahya Saree, a Houthi military spokesman, said the militia struck both airports using missiles or drones.

The Saudi-led military coalition fighting the Houthis announced Wednesday that it responded to the airport attacks by striking dozens of Houthi military targets in Yemen, including missile storage sites and command centers. The Houthis did not immediately respond to that claim.


A senior Pakistani military official, speaking anonymously to discuss operational matters, told The New York Times that Pakistani Air Force fighter jets were used in strikes against the Houthis. This marks the first time one of the Mecca Pact (a Saudi-led Islamic military coalition) member states has come to the defense of a fellow member.

The attacks mark a sharp escalation in Yemen's civil war, which had been paused since a 2022 ceasefire but reignited in recent weeks. The Houthis seized stretches of the Red Sea coast last month, including territory along the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, prompting a Saudi-backed counterattack that retook ground around the strait this week. Still, the Houthis have pressed gains elsewhere, surrounding Yemen's third-largest city, Taiz, and the fighting has displaced 200,000 people since it resumed.

The stakes for Saudi Arabia are tied to the Mecca Pact, a mutual defense treaty it signed with Turkey and Pakistan this summer, though Turkey has not yet ratified it. Turkey said Wednesday it would send mainly defensive and technical support, including equipment, intelligence sharing and weapons systems, while Pakistan has already flown military equipment to Aden and deployed troops inside Saudi Arabia to help secure its borders.


A US official and a Syrian defense official said Damascus was weighing its own options for military support, from defensive aid to an offensive role against the Houthis, even as a Syrian diplomat stressed that Syria's immediate focus remains rebuilding after its own civil war.

Your Money Is Going Digital - And Soon It May Come With Conditions


Your Money Is Going Digital - And Soon It May Come With Conditions
PNW STAFF


Something significant is happening to money in Canada, but Americans shouldn't make the mistake of thinking this is merely a Canadian experiment.

Six of Canada's largest banks — BMO, CIBC, National Bank, RBC, Scotiabank and TD — have announced that they are jointly exploring a Canadian-dollar tokenized deposit system. The banks say the project is intended to provide customers with faster and more efficient payments.

But there is another word in the announcement that deserves attention.

"Programmable."

The banks specifically say their project seeks to deliver "faster, more efficient and programmable payments" to Canadian customers. The first phase would allow tokenized deposits to move efficiently between Canadian financial institutions, while the longer-term goal includes connecting the system with other emerging digital-asset initiatives.

For most consumers, this will probably sound like another technological upgrade. Faster transfers. Instant settlement. Fewer delays. Payments operating around the clock.

And there are legitimate advantages to all of those things.

But programmable money introduces a capability that traditional money has never possessed on this scale: money can potentially interact with rules governing how and when a transaction takes place.

That changes the conversation.


A Dollar That Can Follow Instructions

Cash is remarkably simple.

A twenty-dollar bill does not know who owns it. It doesn't know your political opinions, your location or what you intend to purchase.

It simply represents value.

Programmable digital money is different.

Conditions can potentially be incorporated into transactions through software. A payment could be released when a contractual requirement is satisfied. Funds could automatically move when goods arrive. A financial transaction could execute only after predetermined conditions have been met.

Many applications would be enormously useful.

But the same capability raises an unavoidable question:

If money can obey rules, who ultimately gets to write the rules?

Canada's banks have not announced a system allowing the government to dictate what groceries Canadians may purchase or where individuals may spend their money. Claims that this has already happened go beyond the evidence.

But that isn't really the point.

The significance is that financial infrastructure is being developed in which programmability becomes a normal feature rather than a theoretical possibility.

And Canada isn't doing this in isolation.

This Is Becoming A Global Financial Project

Canada has joined Project Agorá, an international initiative organized by the Bank for International Settlements.

The project is experimenting with a multi-currency system combining tokenized commercial-bank deposits with wholesale central-bank money on a shared programmable platform.

And it is no longer merely theoretical.


In July 2026, 28 financial institutions and central banks across Asia, Europe and North America conducted real-value transactions through Project Agorá. The Bank for International Settlements says the technology can embed "workflow logic, compliance requirements and conditional payment triggers directly into transactions."

The average settlement time during the test was approximately 80 seconds.

The project now involves eight central banks and more than 40 financial institutions. It spans major currencies and financial centers across North America, Europe and Asia.

In other words, the financial world isn't simply digitizing money.

It is experimenting with making digital money interoperable across borders — and programmable.

Europe Adds Digital Identity

Europe is moving aggressively into this new financial environment.

The EU is pursuing the digital euro while simultaneously requiring member states to provide European Digital Identity Wallets by the end of 2026. Those wallets are intended to allow Europeans to prove their identity and store official credentials for interactions with government and private services.

Canada and the European Union also maintain a formal Digital Partnership covering areas including digital identity, data governance and cybersecurity. At their October 1 Digital Dialogue, officials discussed digital credentials and wallets.

Meanwhile, Canadian and European financial officials have discussed the digital euro, Canada's developing stablecoin framework and tokenization in financial markets.

There is no announced agreement to merge Canada's proposed bank tokens with the digital euro.

But the broader direction deserves attention.

Digital identity is expanding.

Digital money is expanding.

Tokenization is expanding.

Cross-border interoperability is expanding.

And programmable transactions are moving from laboratory concepts toward real-world financial infrastructure.

Americans Shouldn't Think This Stops At The Border

It would be easy for American readers to look north at Canada or across the Atlantic at Europe and assume this is something happening somewhere else.

It isn't.

The United States is already deeply involved in the same transformation.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York participates in Project Agorá alongside central banks from Europe, Britain, Japan, South Korea, Mexico and Switzerland.

Meanwhile, J.P. Morgan has already launched JPM Coin, a U.S.-dollar-denominated deposit token available to institutional clients. The bank says its blockchain infrastructure has processed trillions of dollars in transactions and billions of dollars on an average day.

Washington is also building a regulatory framework for another form of digital money: payment stablecoins.

Under the GENIUS Act, federal banking regulators are developing rules governing permitted stablecoin issuers, reserves, customer identification and other requirements.

This does not mean the United States has adopted a retail central bank digital currency or that Washington can suddenly program how Americans spend every dollar.

It does mean America is traveling down the same broader road toward tokenized, always-on and increasingly interconnected digital finance.

The technology may differ from country to country. One nation may emphasize a central-bank digital currency. Another may rely primarily on regulated stablecoins. Another may use tokenized commercial-bank deposits.

But the destination could still produce something remarkably similar:

Money existing on digital networks capable of communicating with identity systems, compliance systems and financial institutions almost instantly.

The architecture is becoming global.

The Bible Described Conditional Commerce Long Ago

For students of Bible prophecy, the implications are difficult to ignore.

Revelation 13 describes an extraordinary future economic system in which participation in commerce becomes conditional. Those who refuse allegiance to the Beast are unable to "buy or sell."

For generations, Christians could understand the prophecy theologically while struggling to imagine how such comprehensive economic control could actually be enforced.

How could authorities monitor millions — potentially billions — of transactions?

How could someone's identity be connected instantly with permission to participate in commerce?

How could restrictions follow an individual from one financial institution to another — or even across borders?

Those questions aren't nearly as difficult to answer anymore.

Bible prophecy does tell us that a time will come when identity, allegiance and economic participation become connected in ways that determine whether a person may buy or sell.

Consider what is now developing simultaneously:

Digital identity establishes who you are.

Digital financial networks establish what money belongs to you.

Programmability allows transactions to interact with predetermined rules.

Compliance technology determines whether transactions satisfy those rules.

Interoperability allows these systems to communicate across financial institutions and national borders.

For the first time in human history, the technological architecture capable of facilitating something resembling that level of economic control is becoming conceivable — and increasingly ordinary.

And perhaps that is the development worth watching most closely.



Europe’s first mainstream political party to formally embrace an anti-Zionist position


On The October 7 Anniversary, The United Kingdom Advocates For Israel’s Eradication ‘From The River To The Sea’



On the third anniversary of October 7th, student organizers in London, England, are determined to hold a pro-Palestinian march through the city. The London Metropolitan Police urged them to choose another date, noting that the demonstration was deliberately planned for the anniversary of Hamas’s attack on Israel, warning about the impact it could have on Jewish students and staff.

This was also the timing around which the United Kingdom’s Green Party voted to adopt a “Zionism is racism” motion, in what the Jerusalem Post describes as “Europe’s first mainstream political party to formally embrace an anti-Zionist position.”

The resolution characterizes Israel as an “apartheid state” and supports replacing Israel with a single Palestinian state across “historic Palestine.” Jewish leaders and Israel’s Foreign Ministry condemned the decision as anti-Semitic, arguing that it denies the Jewish people’s right to national self-determination.

“The Green Party in Britain adopted a resolution equating Zionism with racism, legitimising armed struggle against Israel, and calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state ‘from the river to the sea’ – meaning the destruction of the State of Israel,” the Foreign Ministry emphasized. “The resolution constitutes a clear antisemitic text according to the IHRA definition, as it denies the Jewish people’s right to self-determination.”

Here’s my take.

I know that there are a lot of supporters of Israel in the United Kingdom, but activists like the student groups and the Green Party are drowning out their voices on the global stage.

There are 364 days to “advocate for Palestinians.” How out of touch with reality do you have to be to organize a pro-Palestinian march on October 7th or to call Zionism “racism” on the eve of the anniversary of Hamas’s attack that killed roughly 1,200 Israelis and saw more than 250 people taken hostage?

October 7 should be a day to remember the victims of one of the deadliest attacks on God’s chosen people since the Holocaust, not to use as a platform to minimize the suffering of the Jewish people.



EU Parliament set to call for naval presence in Taiwan Strait


EU Parliament set to call for naval presence in Taiwan Strait


The European Parliament will vote on Wednesday on a call for EU member states to increase naval presence in the Taiwan Strait and surrounding region.


The language is in the Parliament’s recommendation on EU-China relations, drafted by Renew MEP Hilde Vautmans and covering a wide range of bilateral issues between the EU and Beijing.

The text calls on the EU to “work with Member States on closer security coordination, including naval presence and joint exercises, to reinforce stability in the region”.


The language won’t pass unopposed. Left MEP Danilo Della Valle has tabled an amendment to remove the passage, meaning the reference to naval presence and exercises will face a split vote during Wednesday’s plenary.


Della Valle told Rapporteur the report risked pushing the EU towards a “militarist drift” in Asia, arguing that China should be treated as an international partner rather than a strategic rival.

Former Italian Army Chief of Staff Gen. Vincenzo Camporini told Rapporteurthat a European naval presence in the region would require a significant logistical effort, questioning whether European countries have the resources to sustain it.


He pointed to the difficulty Italy and other European countries are already facing in sending ships to the Bab el-Mandeb, calling a permanent European naval presence in the Far East “colossal wishful thinking”.


The vote comes as EU-China relations are hardening on the economic front.


France and Germany have urged the Commission to develop a new trade instrument that could allow Brussels to impose measures up to an “immediate cut-off” from the EU internal market in response to severe and systematic distortions. While China is not named in the Franco-German letter, the initiative is widely seen as being aimed primarily at Beijing.


The EPP strongly backs the report and has asked the EU to “show its muscles” in dealing with China. The text is expected to gain support from the Renew and ECR groups.


Socialists are split on the text, with the group holding a last-minute meeting Tuesday night to find common ground. The group now indicates that it is inclined to vote in favour, pushed by the Belgian, French, Dutch, German and Danish delegations. However, the two largest delegations, Italian and Spanish, are leaning towards abstention, as their respective leaderships consider the text too strongly worded, Socialist sources confirmed to Rapporteur.


The parliamentary text also links the proposed naval presence directly to Taiwan, calling for the EU to “work towards deterring China from escalating” and to develop contingency measures and scenario planning for “possible future developments around the island”.


The Taiwan issue has recently caused inter-institutional tensions in Brussels. In September, the European Commission withdrew from a conference organised by the European Parliament in Italy after Taiwan’s Vice Premier Hsiao Bi-khim was announced as a surprise guest, with Beijing reported to have complained to Rome and Brussels.


The final Parliament’s text insists that the EU should continue developing relations with Taiwan while maintaining its longstanding One China policy, and oppose unilateral changes to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea.


For the Taiwanese authorities, the text, if approved, is a positive sign.


“We greatly welcome the continued attention and support of our like-minded European partners, particularly their clear emphasis on the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and throughout the broader Indo-Pacific region,” Taiwanese Ambassador to Brussels Shieh Jhy-wey told Rapporteur.



Leo XIV to join over 300 leaders for "Spiritual Unification' at scandalous Assisi gathering


The sixth Assisi gathering will feature 384 religious representatives from 53 countries and promote what organizers describe as the ‘spiritual unification’ of the world


Pope Leo XIV will travel to Assisi on October 27 to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the controversial interreligious prayer gathering launched by Pope John Paul II in 1986, together with representatives of the world’s religions

On October 6, a press conference organized by the Community of Sant’Egidio announced that the international meeting marking the 40th anniversary of the World Day of Prayer for Peace convened by John Paul II in 1986 will take place in Assisi from October 25 to 27. The event will bring together 384 representatives of religions, cultures, and institutions from 53 countries, with 155 speakers participating in 24 thematic forums. Pope Leo XIV will preside over the Christian prayer service in the Lower Basilica of St. Francis and will deliver the concluding address in the square in front of the basilica.

Marco Impagliazzo, president of the Community of Sant’Egidio, quoting the historian Alberto Melloni, stated that Assisi interreligious gatherings represent “a turning point in contemporary Catholicism’s attitude towards other religions, and a turning point in the vision that non-Christian religions have of Christianity.”

Over the course of the gathering, 13 separate venues will be used for simultaneous prayer by the different religious groups, which organizers say is intended to avoid the appearance of “religious syncretism,” in keeping with John Paul II’s original vision. At the conclusion of the meeting, participants are expected to sign and proclaim a joint message of peace addressed to the world.

In addition to the Pope, Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi will also be present, not only in his capacity as president of the Italian Bishops’ Conference but also as a leading figure within the Community of Sant’Egidio, as well as Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo, archbishop of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The gathering will feature Andrea Riccardi, the founder of the Community of Sant’Egidio; the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople; Nasaruddin Umar, Indonesia’s minister of Religious Affairs and imam of Jakarta’s mosque; and Hala al-Karib, a Sudanese activist. Chief Rabbi of France Haim Korsia will also be present.

On September 28, during the Pope’s apostolic journey through France, together with other representatives of religions, Korsia signed the Metz Appeal in the presence of Leo XIV, a document that echoes the “Spirit of Assisi” and once again proposes all religions as necessary instruments for “disarming” the world.

The topics of the 24 scheduled forums cover a broad range of issues, including disarmament, climate change, and migration. These discussion sessions will feature representatives of major secular and globalist organizations, foremost among them the Gates Foundation, as well as a number of secular intellectuals.


According to Impagliazzo, the “spiritual unification” of the world is necessary to counter the resurgence of nationalism, which he says is undermining the multilateralism promoted by international bodies such as the United Nations and the European Union. Religions, on his account, can serve as useful instruments in the hands of these institutions for reaffirming their vision of the world.

During the press conference, Impagliazzo also made critical reference to the objections raised by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre from the time of the first 1986 gathering: “I remember the Lefebvrists, the most ferocious critics … because it was believed that continuing these meetings would pose risks of turning the Church into a spectacle … or even of syncretism…. No syncretism: everyone according to their own traditions.”

On October 27, 1986, at the invitation of Pope John Paul II and with the close cooperation of the Community of Sant’Egidio, which decided not to limit the “Spirit of Assisi” to a one-time event, 130 representatives of various Christian denominations and world religions gathered in Assisi for the World Day of Prayer for Peace.

The event immediately provoked indignation in broad sectors of the Church. Among the most controversial episodes was the placementof a statue of Buddha on the tabernacle inside the Church of St. Peter in Assisi.

On October 28, 1999, John Paul II renewed the interreligious gathering with a new large assembly held between Rome and Assisi. On that occasion, Bishop Bernard Fellay of the Society of St. Pius X sent a formal letter of protest to the pontiff, denouncing the revival of a scandal that placed the one true Church founded by Christ on the same level as pagan and heretical religions.

With the election of Pope Benedict XVI, the Vatican hierarchy attempted to recalibrate ecumenical dialogue, but events such as his visit to Istanbul’s Blue Mosque on November 30, 2006, demonstrated substantial continuity with the line of the “Spirit of Assisi.”

On October 27, 2011, Benedict XVI convened the fourth Assisi interreligious meeting, to mark the 25th anniversary of the first prayer gathering. At this meeting, Pope Benedict decided to includeatheists and non-believers among the official guests invited to the Basilica of Saint Mary of the Angels.



On September 20, 2016, Pope Francis presided over the fifth interreligious gathering marking the 30th anniversary of the original event, bolstered in part by the significant influence of the Community of Sant’Egidio on the agenda and orientation of his pontificate.