Thursday, October 29, 2026

Final Results: 53 seats for Netanyahu bloc, 48 seats for opposition


Final Results: 53 seats for Netanyahu bloc, 48 seats for opposition



The Central Elections Committee announced that the counting of "double envelope" votes has been completed. In the elections for the 26th Knesset, a total of 5,564,764 valid votes and 25,072 invalid votes were received.

The Likud, led by Benjamin Netanyahu, continues to lead and has risen to 27 seats, followed by Yashar, led by Gadi Eisenkot, with 21 seats.


The Together party, led by Naftali Bennett, has 12 seats, while the Joint List has 11 seats. The Democrats, led by Yair Golan, and Ra’am, led by Mansour Abbas, each have eight seats.

Yisrael Beytenu, Otzma Yehudit, and United Torah Judaism each have seven seats, while the joint Religious Zionist and Zehut list has six seats. Shas joined them after falling to six seats as the vote counting approached its conclusion.

The drop to six seats represents a historic low for Shas, which records its lowest result since the elections for the 12th Knesset in 1988, in which it received six seats. Since then, the party has not dropped below the seven-seat threshold.

For comparison, in the 2022 elections, Shas won 11 seats, and now it is losing almost half of its parliamentary power.

Reservists and Economic Party, led by Yoaz Hendel and Yaron Zlekha, came close to the electoral threshold but remained below it, with 2.67% of the vote, compared with the 3.25% required to enter the Knesset.

Amcha Yisrael, led by Ofer Winter, will also not make the cut, with 1.63% of the vote.

The current coalition, led by Netanyahu, has 53 seats, while the opposition bloc holds a combined 48 seats. The two Arab parties, the Joint List and Ra’am, hold a total of 19 seats.

This means neither bloc has a majority of 61 seats on its own, and the formation of the next government will depend on the possibility of political cooperation between blocs.


Could Netanyahu expand the Iran war before forming a government?


The Arab world is watching: could Netanyahu expand the Iran war before forming a government?



Analysis: Israel’s inconclusive election, a Pentagon leadership shake-up and a U.S.-Iran diplomatic backchannel are raising questions across the Middle East; could Netanyahu use the caretaker period to expand the war before a new coalition takes shape?


Israel’s October 27 election has left the country with arithmetic in an unfamiliar setting. With almost all ordinary ballots counted by October 29, preliminary projections gave Benjamin Netanyahu’s bloc 53 seats, Gadi Eisenkot’s opposition bloc 48, and Arab parties 19 in the 120-seat Knesset.

No bloc can govern alone, and double-envelope ballots remain uncounted. The figures may shift, but the central question is clear: does the transition constrain Israel’s use of force, or could it create a brief period in which leaders consider decisions they might avoid once coalition bargaining begins?

The question matters because the conflict with Iran has not ended. The United States and Israel began strikes on February 28, and ceasefire efforts have not produced a durable settlement. Intermittent attacks, threats and diplomatic proposals continue to shape the confrontation.

Washington is weighing renewed military action even as Vice President JD Vance has reportedly opened a channel to senior Iranian security official Mohsen Rezaei. Israel’s caretaker period is therefore more than a domestic story. It could influence the timing and political consequences of another round of fighting.


Some regional observers see the transition as a possible window for escalation. They do not claim Netanyahu has decided to strike or that Arab governments share one assessment. Their argument is that a leader without a settled coalition may calculate political costs differently from one dependent on daily bargaining. If he believes diplomacy could leave Iran with nuclear or missile capabilities, he may see an opportunity to act before a new coalition constrains him. This remains unproven. No public evidence establishes a decision or timetable.

The escalation theory is straightforward. Netanyahu may believe he has less to lose by making a security move now than by entering talks where each partner can demand concessions. A successful operation could shift the agenda, pressure opposition parties toward an emergency government and strengthen his claim that security comes before politics. But the reverse is possible. If an operation fails, causes heavy casualties or triggers sustained attacks on Israeli cities, it could damage public confidence and make cooperation harder. A military crisis does not automatically produce unity.




Naval drones sink Israeli-operated cargo ship off Bulgaria's Black Sea coast


i24NEWS


The Greek-owned, Israeli-operated vessel sank off Bulgaria after being struck by three naval drones, as suspicions grow over Russian involvement in a wave of Black Sea shipping attacks

Israeli-operated cargo ship, the Contship Jet, was struck by unidentified naval drones in the Black Sea off Varna, Bulgaria, on Wednesday.

The Contship Jet, a Greek-owned, Israeli-operated cargo ship, departed Haifa on Sunday bound for Constanta, Romania, just north of where it sank.

The Bulgarian Navy said the ship was struck by three unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) at roughly noon local time, sinking hours later and taking 421 containers with it. 

All crew members were rescued unharmed, ZIM announced.

Immediately following reports of the attack, French maritime patrol aircraft conducted reconnaissance missions in the area and supported rescue efforts.

The Contship Jet is the ninth civilian ship struck this month alone in the Black Sea, leaving over 30 sailors dead.

This attack comes as the defence ministers of Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey were meeting to discuss maritime security in the Black Sea.

Suspicion has fallen on Russia over the attacks, although Bulgaria’s government has been reluctant to assign blame.


Things To Come:


Behold, He Comes!



The description of Jesus, the Word of God, that John records in Revelation 19:15-16 belies the claim that the Rapture and the Second Coming occur as a single event. We know that when Christ comes for His Church at the Rapture, He comes as a Bridegroom for His Bride. We will meet Him in the air—with the “dead in Christ” rising first, and those who are alive following in the twinkling of an eye.

He will take us to His Father’s house, where we will dwell with Him in the place He has prepared for us. And we will celebrate the Marriage Supper of the Lamb—the title given to the suffering Son of God who redeemed us by His own blood.

When He returns to the earth, we will follow after Him as described above. And His demeanor will not convey the eager love of a Bridegroom, but the indignation of a King. In fact, John’s description is of a Warrior King returning to set right what has long been tolerated.

In Matthew 21, Jesus told of a landowner who planted a vineyard and rented it to tenants to tend. At harvest time, he sent servants to receive his portion. But the tenants beat and killed the servants, along with a larger group he sent to advocate his interests. Finally, he sent his own son, saying, “They will respect my son.” But the evil tenants conspired to kill the son and seize his inheritance.

This parable is a dramatic picture of God’s relationship with the unrepentant world. “The earth is the LORD’s, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein” (Psalm 24:1, KJV). He has every right to ownership of every square inch, every living creature, every image-bearing person. And His only begotten Son has the same claim. To quote Abraham Kuyper, “There is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry: ‘Mine!'”

Yet evil men—representative of the entirety of the human race—conspired to kill the Son. They hung Him on a cross and buried Him in a borrowed tomb. They thought they had usurped God’s claim, tearing His fetters and casting off His cords. How wrong they were. How wrong all are who continue to flaunt their wickedness and hope that God’s indignation is never aroused.

Jesus’ question at the end of this parable offers a segue to the scene in Revelation 19: “Therefore when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those vine-growers?”(Matthew 21:40). Even the chief priests and elders answered rightly: “He will bring those wretches to a wretched end.”

Thus, in righteousness He will judge and wage war. Jesus will return as a Warrior King. John says, “From His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the winepress of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty” (Revelation 19:15).


In short order, He will destroy the armies arrayed on the Plain of Jezreel (the Valley of Armageddon), merely speaking a word that will cause those wicked warriors to rot where they stand. He will set foot on the Mount of Olives overlooking Jerusalem from the east. As He begins walking toward the Eastern Gate, the valley containing Jewish and Muslim graves will split in two—with half moving toward the north and half moving toward the south. As He approaches the gate sealed by Suleiman to keep the Jewish Messiah out, the ancient gate will fly open so that the King of Glory might come in.

Lift up your heads, O gates, and be lifted up, O ancient doors, that the King of glory may come in! Who is this King of glory? Yahweh strong and mighty, Yahweh mighty in battle. Lift up your heads, O gates, and lift yourselves up, O ancient doors, that the King of glory may come in! Who is He, this King of glory? Yahweh of hosts, He is the King of glory. Selah (Psalm 24:7-10).

Then Jesus will ascend to the Temple Mount to fulfill the promise prophesied of Him: to reign from the throne of His father, David.

Ezekiel also prophesied of the glorious day when the glory of God would once again fill the Temple. Coming from the east, the glory will return through the Eastern Gate to take up residence in the Temple once again (Ezekiel 43:1-7). That anticipated scene offers a preview of what is described in Revelation 19.

Soon after His return, Jesus will separate the sheep from the goats and initiate His Millennial Reign. Eventually, “every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father” (Philippians 2:10-11). Those who have rejected Him will forever regret hardening their heart against the love and mercy of God.

Even before John described the Second Coming, he recorded the praise that resounded in Heaven. Responding to a voice from the throne of God that said, “Give praise to our God, all you His bond-servants, you who fear Him, the small and the great,” the great multitude preparing to mount their war chargers cried out with the voice of many waters and many peals of thunder, saying, “Hallelujah! For the Lord our God, the Almighty, reigns” (Revelation 19:5–6).

Brothers and sisters in Christ, saints of the living God, we too can resonate with praise right now as we anticipate His soon return and His glorious Second Coming. Far from discouraged or distracted by the trials of this life, we can cry out: “Hallelujah! For the Lord our God, the Almighty, reigns.”


US tells allies: Prepare for possible Iran strikes and retaliation


US tells allies: Prepare for possible Iran strikes and retaliation


The United States has warned several Middle Eastern countries and regional allies to prepare for the possibility of renewed American military strikes against Iran following next week's midterm elections, as well as potential Iranian retaliation targeting their territory, The Associated Press reported Wednesday.

Two diplomats familiar with the warnings said American diplomatic and defense officials had advised regional governments to take precautions against possible attacks by Iran and its proxy groups.

Both diplomats spoke anonymously because they were not authorized to discuss the sensitive communications.

According to the diplomats, President Donald Trump has not yet decided whether to authorize another military operation against the Islamic Republic, although he has repeatedly indicated that additional strikes could take place after the November 3 elections.

American officials have informed regional allies that a new offensive could last several days. However, officials in the Middle East are concerned that retaliatory attacks by Iran and its proxies could prolong the confrontation beyond the initial American operation.

The warnings specifically highlighted the possibility of Iranian strikes against energy installations and other critical infrastructure, prompting Washington to urge its partners to strengthen their defensive preparations.

The White House and other American officials declined to comment on the report.

The latest warnings follow a report published Tuesday by The Wall Street Journal, which revealed that Washington had advised several Gulf Arab countries to prepare for a potentially brief but intensive military campaign against Iran after the midterm elections.

According to that report, the US military has already begun taking precautionary steps in the region, including reinforcing air defense systems and moving personnel away from bases considered vulnerable to Iranian attacks.

Trump, who has spent recent weeks campaigning for Republican candidates ahead of the November 3 vote, has declined to provide a definitive answer about whether he intends to resume military operations against Tehran.

During an election rally in Texas on Tuesday, the President defended his earlier decision to attack Iran and said he would make the same choice again.

“Somebody asked me yesterday, it’s very interesting, ‘If you had to do it again, would you have attacked Iran?’ I said absolutely," Trump told supporters.

“It’s one of the greatest things I ever did," he added.

Trump also insisted that he would determine when the conflict ends, emphasizing that any settlement must ensure Iran never obtains nuclear weapons.

"Somebody asked me before, when will the war in Iran end? I said, whenever I want it to end. It'll be very quick, but we have to have it end properly, with total and complete - a total statement, they will never have a nuclear weapon. Number one state sponsor [of terrorism]. They will never have a nuclear weapon."

The President had previously addressed the prospect of further strikes during an exchange with reporters on Saturday, refusing to disclose whether military action was imminent.