Monday, September 14, 2026

BRICS Steps Off The Dollar, With Iran Pressing Hardest


BRICS Steps Off The Dollar, With Iran Pressing Hardest


The 18th BRICS summit opened on Saturday with the bloctaking its most concrete step yet toward loosening the grip of the US dollar, adopting a 45-page New Delhi Declaration on the first day and endorsing a payments architecture built to route cross-border trade around the Western financial system. For most members the move was incremental. For Iran — under sweeping US sanctions, a naval blockade, and roughly six months into a war with the United States and Israel — it was closer to a lifeline.

Leaders gathered at the Bharat Mandapam convention center adopted the New Delhi Declaration 2026 unanimously on the opening day, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi emerging from a closed session to report that no member had objected to the text. The economic centerpiece was a commitment to expand trade and investment settled in members’ own national currencies, and to link their domestic payment and messaging systems so that transactions can move without passing through the dollar-denominated SWIFT network. According to the declaration, the bloc’s payment task force had studied cross-border interoperability of those channels and examined using local currencies for trade settlement and investment.

The mechanism drawing the most attention was BRICS Pay, a decentralized payment-messaging framework that stitches together India’s UPI, China’s CIPS, and Russia’s SPFS into a shared interoperability layer — a way to clear payments among members outside SWIFT. The declaration also referenced a pilot for a gold-backed “Unit” token.


Just as telling was what the bloc again declined to do. There was no endorsement of a single common BRICS currency; India in particular has resisted that leap, favoring interoperable national-currency settlement over the political and monetary complexity of a shared unit. The result, as several observers characterized it, is incremental financial de-dollarization rather than a monetary union — plumbing, not a new reserve currency.

The response from Washington was immediate. President Trump threatened tariffs of up to 100% on the bloc, extending a pressure campaign he has waged all year against what he calls BRICS’s “anti-American” trajectory. The threat carries genuine weight for export-dependent members that rely on the US market — but its deterrent power erodes with each transaction the bloc succeeds in routing through non-dollar channels.

That is the paradox Washington now faces: the tariffs are meant to punish de-dollarization, yet de-dollarization is precisely what blunts the tariffs.

No member arrived with more at stake than Iran. President Masoud Pezeshkian pressed the case for national-currency trade, telling reporters that expanding the use of members’ own currencies in intra-bloc commerce was among the most important steps the group could take. Tehran has pushed throughout the summit for mechanisms to insulate members from Western financial pressure — a priority sharpened by the sanctions and blockade it now faces.

Crucially, the summit institutionalizes at the multilateral level what Iran has already been building bilaterally. On January 29, 2026, Tehran signed a trilateral strategic pact with China and Russia, an agreement whose economic core is the construction of alternative financial mechanisms that sidestep SWIFT and reduce exposure to the dollar-centered system. That pact rests on foundations already in place: an Iran–Russia monetary agreement, operational since early 2025, that settles trade directly in rials and rubles and links Russia’s Mir card network to Iran’s Shetab system; a 25-year Iran–China cooperation framework; and the plain fact that China now buys the overwhelming majority of Iran’s oil, much of it settled in yuan.

The implication cuts against the common assumption that Iran is scrambling for a dollar workaround. It already has one.


More....



The 2028 Digital ID Deadline Approaches, and the Cost of Refusal Is Everything


Final Warning: The 2028 Digital ID Deadline Approaches, and the Cost of Refusal Is Everything


Something shifts beneath the surface of ordinary life. Not with announcements or spectacle, but through the quiet consolidation of systems that now track, verify, and gatekeep nearly every exchange between citizens and the institutions they rely upon. By 2028, according to timelines established by international bodies and echoed in domestic policy papers, Americans will face a choice that is not really a choice at all: accept a federally standardized Digital ID or find yourself locked out of the economy you helped build.

This deadline is not speculative. The World Bank, the United Nations Development Programme, and the World Economic Forum have all converged on 2028 as the target for universal digital identity implementation. 

Within the United States, federal agencies have accelerated pilot programs linking biometric data to financial access, travel privileges, and social services. What appears as technological modernization is, upon closer inspection, the construction of a comprehensive control system—one where participation in society requires continuous verification, and where verification can be revoked without appeal.

The warning signs have accumulated for years, visible to anyone willing to look past the marketing language of convenience and security. Contactless payments normalized the idea that physical currency is suspicious. Vaccine passports established the precedent that health data serves as an access credential. Banking apps demonstrated that accounts can freeze instantly based on algorithmic risk assessments or political criteria. Each precedent seemed isolated. Taken together, they form a clear trajectory toward a society where identity itself becomes a conditional privilege rather than a fixed right.

We are not discussing a distant dystopia. The infrastructure is being built now, in real time, through partnerships between government agencies and technology firms that operate with minimal public scrutiny. The consequences of this transition will not be temporary adjustments but permanent alterations to the conditions of freedom itself. To understand what is at stake requires looking honestly at the mechanisms being assembled, the dependencies being engineered, and the alternatives that are rapidly disappearing.



How Digital ID Actually Works

  1. Digital ID functions as a gateway mechanism rather than mere identification—a switch that can be toggled to sever individuals from essential services without judicial oversight or evidentiary standards.

  2. Biometric integration, including facial recognition, retinal scanning, and behavioral analysis, creates immutable identifiers that cannot be discarded or temporarily borrowed, eliminating the anonymity that cash transactions and informal economies once preserved.

  3. Cross-referencing capabilities allow real-time correlation of location data, purchasing patterns, social associations, and digital communications, constructing predictive behavioral models that anticipate dissent before it materializes into action.

  4. Technical architecture relies on blockchain and distributed ledger technologies that claim immutability as a feature, meaning erroneous data entries or punitive designations become permanent elements of one’s digital record.

  5. Private sector participation ensures that compliance extends beyond government mandates into corporate policy, where exclusion from banking, housing, and employment can be enforced through Terms of Service rather than legislative action.
The implementation proceeds through incremental acclimatization. 

 Initially, Digital ID emerges as optional convenience—a faster lane through airport security, a streamlined method for tax filing. Early adopters receive minor privileges that validate the system for skeptics. 

Then comes soft mandate: certain services become available exclusively through digital verification, justified through appeals to security or fraud prevention. Finally, the hard deadline arrives, the 2028 threshold where non-participation becomes synonymous with non-existence within the formal economy.

Recent years have demonstrated how these systems function in practice. Canadian authorities froze the bank accounts of protesting truckers without judicial process. British citizens discovered that certain political donations triggered financial surveillance. American businesses learned that ideological deviation from prevailing narratives could result in debanking and commercial exclusion. These were not aberrations. They were rehearsals for systematic financial control through Digital ID infrastructure.


Cash Is Disappearing, and Taking Privacy With It

Paper currency and metal coinage represent the final domain of transactional privacy—the last space where exchange occurs without intermediaries, surveillance, or permission. Its elimination constitutes not merely logistical change but a fundamental redefinition of money itself, from tangible asset to conditional privilege.

Physical cash carries properties that digital systems cannot replicate: immediacy, finality, anonymity. When you hand a twenty-dollar bill to a merchant, the transaction completes without third-party verification. No bank records the exchange. No algorithm flags the purchase for analysis. No institution maintains the capacity to reverse the transfer or freeze the funds. This directness offends control systems because it escapes monitoring.

When money exists only as database entries, you possess not wealth but conditional access. The distinction matters. True ownership implies control—your property remains yours regardless of external opinion. Conditional access implies permission—your resources remain available only so long as you maintain favorable standing with gatekeepers.

The elimination of cash also destroys the informal economy that has sustained communities through turbulence. Side jobs paid in cash. Yard sales conducted with neighbors. Charitable giving that leaves no paper trail. Emergency reserves hidden in homes. These practices, essential to resilience and independence, become impossible when all value flows through monitored channels. The grandmother who slips cash to a struggling grandchild, the neighbor who pays for informal childcare, the teenager who earns under-the-table wages for yard work—all these transactions enter the light of surveillance, taxed and tracked and stripped of human immediacy.

Artificial Intelligence Is Now the Gatekeeper




A Swarm Of More Than 80 Earthquakes Just Hit Southern California As The Entire Pacific Ring Of Fire Becomes Much More Active


A Swarm Of More Than 80 Earthquakes Just Hit Southern California As The Entire Pacific Ring Of Fire Becomes Much More Active
Michael Snyder

For those of us that live in the United States, the seemingly endless shaking that we have been witnessing in California this year has been quite alarming. Within the past 7 days alone, there have been 836 earthquakes in California and Nevada. Southern California has been particularly active in recent days. From Friday night to Saturday morning, a swarm of “more than 80 quakes” shook the region…

Dozens of small earthquakes have struck across Southern California within the past 24 hours, including more than 80 quakes occurring in Los Angeles County, local officials say.

The region was hit by six earthquakes of magnitude 2.5 or greater during this time, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. The strongest of these quakes was a 3.4-magnitude recorded off the coast of Catalina Island early Saturday morning.

The quakes started Friday with a 2.5-magnitude earthquake, which struck 3.7 miles southwest of Ojai in Ventura County at 10:46 p.m. Hours later, a 2.7-magnitude earthquake shook the Los Angeles neighborhood of Westmont, east of LAX, at 12:34 a.m. Saturday.

At 4:03 a.m., a 2.6-magnitude earthquake struck roughly 17 miles southeast of Avalon. A 3.0 hit the same area at 4:11 a.m. The two quakes were followed by the larger 3.4-magnitude quake that struck near Catalina Island at 4:13 a.m.


Northern California has been getting hit by a lot of quakes too.

Very early on Saturday, a magnitude 3.4 earthquake rattled the East Bay area…

A 3.4 magnitude earthquake shook the East Bay early Saturday morning, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Just before 12:30 a.m., an earthquake recorded at about 11 miles deep stuck about 5.5 miles northeast of Brentwood.

People between Stockton, Pittsburg and Pleasanton reported feeling the effects.


Of course it isn’t just California that has been getting rattled lately.

In the middle of last week, the Pacific Ring of Fire was suddenly shaken by over a dozen quakes of magnitude 4.0 or greater

In the latest burst of seismic activity, more than a dozen earthquakes of magnitude 4.0 or higher have rattled the Pacific Ring of Fire.

13 earthquakes rattled cities across 8 countries between Wednesday and Thursday, with some minor seismic activity happening in the very center of the Pacific Ring of Fire.


Since the beginning of the summer, it has been a constant barrage of earthquakes.

South America has been getting hit particularly hard.

Could the North American portion of the Pacific Ring of Fire be next?

More...




Sunday, September 13, 2026

Israeli officials concerned over Houthis' successful offensive in Yemen; Netanyahu said to offer military support


Israeli officials concerned over Houthis' successful offensive in Yemen; Netanyahu said to offer military support


The Houthis' shocking recent successes, and the U.S. hesitation to help the Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces stop the terror group's advance, which has now captured the strategic coast along the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, have set off alarm bells in Israel.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly even offered Israeli military participation in a broader regional effort to counter the Iranian-backed Houthi militia in Yemen, the Lebanese Hezbollah-affiliated news outlet Al-Akhbar reported on Friday, citing unnamed U.S. sources.

The report comes after the Houthis seized the Yemeni port city of al-Mokha earlier this week, near the strategically important Strait of Bab al-Mandeb on the Red Sea. Much of the world’s commercial shipping passes through the Strait. The Houthis, who openly call for Israel’s destruction, began attacking Israel and international commercial shipping shortly after Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 terror attack on southern Israel.

The Israeli government has neither confirmed nor denied the report of potential Israeli military involvement. Speaking on condition of anonymity, an Israeli official warned on Friday that Houthi control of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait could be even more dangerous than the Iranian regime’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

“They will be able to fire at whatever they want with anti-tank missiles. They will be able to see the ships with their own eyes,” the official toldIsrael's N12 News, warning that it "gives enormous power to the terror organization."

Ariel Oseran, senior Middle East correspondent for i24 News, expressed similar concerns, warning that Houthi control of the area could threaten international shipping and Saudi trade.

“This will allow them to pose a more direct threat to shipping in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, thus increasing the threat to Saudi Arabia. A former Yemeni Military official tells me that the boasting by Yemeni government forces yesterday was actually a cover for their losses on the coastline,” Oseran assessed.

The Houthis have fired hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones at Israel over the past three years. Israel has responded with strikes against key Houthi sites across Yemen.

The unconfirmed report suggests that Israel could potentially join a broader regional campaign against the Houthis to prevent the group from threatening international shipping through the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait.

Arab Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia, are also concerned about the Houthi offensive near the strategic waterway.

On Thursday, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) urged U.S. President Donald Trump to order strikes against the Houthis. However, Trump reportedly rejected the Saudi request to involve American forces, according to an Axios report that cited two unnamed U.S. officials.

Instead, Washington reportedly offered to provide Saudi Arabia with intelligence and targeting data on Houthi positions. There are reportedly some 200 U.S. military personnel in Saudi Arabia who could potentially assist the Saudi military.

While Saudi Arabia possesses a modern military equipped largely with U.S.-made weapons systems, it has limited combat experience and has traditionally relied on U.S. military support against external threats.

Meanwhile, the Israeli news outlet Ma'arivreported onTuesday that Jerusalem is monitoring the Houthi takeover of Mokha port near Bab el-Mandeb.

IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir and Israel Navy Commander Vice Adm. Eyal Harel warned the Houthis and the Iranian regime this week against threatening Israel.

“We removed and pushed back existential threats that had been built up against us for years,” Zamir said. “We will not allow existential threats to emerge from radical enemies, and we will not allow terrorist organizations to establish themselves along our borders.”

The IDF chief also directly addressed the Houthi offensive near Bab el-Mandeb.

“In Bab el-Mandeb, in the heart of Beirut, in Lebanon’s ports and off the coast of Gaza, we proved that the IDF’s long arm is powerful, determined and reaches everywhere to strike those who seek to harm us.”


Choose You This Day…War or Peace


Choose You This Day…War or Peace
Terry James

The Word of God tells us that this is the condition of fallen humanity since Eden. We cry “peace, peace, when there is no peace” (Jeremiah 6:14 and Jeremiah 8:11, with a similar thought also found in Ezekiel 13:16 and Micah 3:5).

That we are still in the throes of war that destroys earthly peace is proven hourly in our news feeds. Ironically, one appropriate example involves the writer of War and Peace in an indirect way.

Pyotr Tolstoy, deputy chairman of the State Duma and great-great-grandson of Russian writer Leo Tolstoy, has called for massed bombing of Ukrainian cities to break the resistance of the people living in them and force a surrender, the news outlet 24 Kanal reported.

Russia denies striking civilians and claims after each attack that it hit military targets, even as its missiles land on homes, hospitals, power plants, and food depots. Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi said Tolstoy’s words should be grounds for an International Criminal Court arrest warrant, calling them a Russian official’s demand for war crimes.

What Tolstoy has urged in public, Russian forces have done for more than 12 years while denying it.

The presenter proposed emptying the cities.

On the state talk show Vremya Pokazhet, which Tolstoy hosts, he was reminded that more than 20 million people live in Ukraine and asked what would become of them if the country were turned to scorched earth. He proposed warning residents a day before strikes so they could flee their homes.

“You think we are calling for cruelty? We are calling for demoralizing the population so thoroughly that it comes out to meet our troops with its little paws up,” Tolstoy said.

Then he named the reason.

In the end, Tolstoy described what Ukraine means for Russia’s plans.

“[Ukraine] is the kind of territory that will allow us to export our energy resources to Europe by the short route,” he said. (“A senior Russian official said out loud what Russia’s missiles do every night,” 24 Kanal,  RR News August 29, 2026)

It becomes more obvious with each passing day that Russia is building toward war. Whether such war can be contained to Putin’s need to conquer Ukraine is questionable. Because he is losing the ability to act as the strongman leader in not having yet defeated the smaller foe, the question is: Might the thought to instigate a wider war in order to prove himself be the “evil thought” Ezekiel the prophet referred to in the Gog-Magog prophecy?

War is inevitable, and peace is not possible in this post-Eden fallen world. James the apostle says the following about this matter.

“From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not” (James 4:1-2).

More...