The Official Gazette of Brazil published a ruling that “The Ministry of Defense is approved to be the agency that interprets the Constitution in Brazil.”
This means, the Ministry of Defense will officially exercise the function of interpreting the Constitution. This privilege usually belongs to the Supreme Court. The new ruling “harbors explosive force in light of the show-down between Jair Bolsonaro and the Brazilian Supreme Court in the decisive battle for power in the country”, Rio Times writes.
“President Bolsonaro is playing chess”, Brazilian Conservative leader Samia Sittel-Faraj told Gateway Pundit. “Our Supreme Court changed the constitution so the left wing can take power. Justice (Luís Roberto) Barroso changed the interpretation of Article 142” which authorizes the armed forces, under the command of the president, to perform a ‘military intervention’.
“But now, Bolsonaro has turned over the interpretation of the constitution to the Ministry of Defense. This is a clear sign that Bolsonaro will act. If he would be handing over to Nine Fingers (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva) , why would he do that?”
President Bolsonaro had always insisted he would act within the law and the constitution, says Sittel-Faraj.
“This is the sequence of the chess moves”, she said:
1) On Dec. 19 all congress members were officially certified, meaning that they have the right to assume their seats in the parlament.
A large number of conservatives were elected, one of the the indicators Lula’s victory was fraudulent.
3) As of yesterday, the parliament is on holiday, but the Supreme Court judges are so worried that they did not take the break.
A spy was uncovered within the Bolsonaro staff who was giving information to Chief Justice Alexander de Moraes.
“Moraes is now blind and very worried”, Sittel-Faraj said. “He should be, because if the President gives the order now, Moraes will go to jail.” If Bolsonaro would have acted before certification on Dec. 19, perahps the elected representatives would not have supported him, she noted. “But now, they have the right to take their seats.”
A new technical study by an international group of forensic analystsf0und more proof of election fraud, indicating strong divergences between new voting machines and old voting machines:
In analyzing the data from the second round, the forensic scientists found serious discrepancies.
The data took as reference the voting of the candidates in the second round, considering the electoral zones, with the analysis of the second digit of the numerical series.