School Children Forced To Recite Islamic Prayers

School children in Germany FORCED to recite ISLAMIC PRAYERS

The father of the pupil at the girl’s primary school in German ski resort Garmisch-Partenkirchen discovered that his daughter had been forced to learn the Islamic prayer when he discovered a handout she had been given.

“Fury as German primary school ‘forces’ children to chant ‘Allahu Akbar’ in Muslim prayer,” By Zoe Efstathiou, The Express, Oct 27, 2016

PUPILS at a primary school were forced to chant “Allahu Akhbar” and “there is no God but Allah”, an appalled father has claimed.

He claimed she had been “forced” by teachers to memorise the Islamic chants and forwarded the handout to Austrian news service unsertirol24.

The handout read: “Oh Allah, how perfect you are and praise be to you. Blessed is your name, and exalted is your majesty. There is no God but you.”It had been given to the girl during a lesson in “ethics” at the Bavarian school.

And while this is a German story, do not think yourselves safe. This is exactly what is going on in American public schools across the country. I have written extensively of this very thing here. 

Non-Muslim children must refuse to say these prayers. They must stand up for their belief system. Reciting Muslim prayers violates their religious rights. This goes beyond proselytizing.

The conquest is complete, is it not? The jihad attacks, the hijah (immigration jihad) and now …… the children. The question is, what is it that Western elites see (besides oil) in Muslim countries that they wish to emulate and/or import. What one thing, what any thing, does the West see in Muslim countries that is good for humanity and human progress? Muslim countries living under Islamic law and Islam is a many things but primarily political are failed states. And if they are successful, why are Muslims fleeing to the West.

Migrants now outnumber native children at many schools in Germany as the country has been inundated with migrants in recent years.

More than one million migrants are estimated to have arrived in Germany during the last year alone.The Federal Office for Migration and Refugees estimates that another 200,000 people will apply for asylum in 2017.

Religious freedom on the line Nov. 8

Nothing less than America’s constitutional commitment to freedom of religion is at stake in the 2016 presidential election.

This is not hyperbole, exaggeration or overstatement if one grasps the definition and understanding of “religious freedom” held by America’s founders.

To them, “religion” meant belief systems that centered around the God of the Bible. Thus, the constitutionally guaranteed protections of freedom of religion were designed to protect the rights of citizens to follow the dictates of their faiths in an overwhelmingly Christian society, yet one that included much theological diversity.

The founders believed that the unique experiment America afforded in “self-government,” meaning sovereign individuals would govern themselves for the most part, allowing for strict limits on government power, could only be achieved and sustained in a society with the general moral standards shared by Christians and Jews. On the other hand, a society in which every man and woman did what was right in their own eyes would require the heavy hand of government coercion.

Never could the founders have imagined how far America would drift from its Judeo-Christian roots over the next 200 years:

• Today, one presidential candidate, along with most members and leaders of her political party, believe it is a good idea for the country to accept with enthusiasm and subsidies massive numbers of Sunni Muslim immigrants from the Middle East at the expense of Christian refugees facing a genuine genocide at the hands of mostly Sunni Muslims.
• That same presidential candidate suggests all opposition to her plan to increase the influx of Muslims is, in fact, unconstitutional – a violation of the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of religion, even though immigration into the U.S. has always been considered a privilege and applicants have always been asked about their religion.
• When asked what kind of Supreme Court justices she would nominate if she became president, this candidate said she would consider only those who would uphold Roe v. Wade, the decision that struck down abortion laws in most states. Perhaps her most sacred political commitment is to the unrestricted, unregulated killing of unborn babies for any reason or no particular reason at all. She also wants to require taxpayers to participate in the destruction of the most innocent form of human life by supporting it more generously and widely with government funding.
• The communications director of that same presidential candidate, Jennifer Palmieri, wrote an email to John Podesta, her campaign manager, in which she ripped Catholicism and evangelical Christianity as “severely backwards” when it comes to “gender relations.”
• She is also unequivocally supportive of what she calls “marriage equality,” which means not only can men marry men and women marry women, but those who do not share that unbiblical belief have no right to opt out of participation in the preparation of those ceremonies, nor the right of refusal to participate in them – a clear violation of religious freedom. Americans have already been prosecuted, fined, sued and lost their jobs and businesses for simply declining to bake cakes, prepare floral arrangements and provide catering services and photographic and video services for same-sex weddings because of their own religious convictions.
• But, perhaps most stunning and alarming of all is what this presidential candidate said last year in speaking to the 2015 Women in the World Summit, declaring that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” This is a presidential candidate who openly and defiantly proclaims that “religious beliefs … have to be changed.” Freedom of religion, as America’s founders viewed it, had two parts: 1) free exercise by individuals; and 2) a prohibition on the establishment of a national religion. On this test, one presidential candidate flunks both constitutional provisions.

If Hillary Clinton is elected president of the United States in November, you can expect an all-out war by her regime on freedom of religion in America – and particularly on those individuals and institutions that promote a Judeo-Christian worldview with devotion to the God of the Bible and His laws.

ISIS using ‘tens of thousands’ as human shields in Mosul 

6 children killed, over a dozen injured in rebel shelling of Aleppo school (VIDEO)

Young Russians called up for national service as tensions between Putin and the West rise 

Vladimir Putin does not want war but WILL attack the West if provoked over Syria 

What's the Rush: Pentagon Waging 'Strange War' in Mosul and Raqqa

Voting shenanigans in almost all swing states

Veteran Democrat warns against ‘Clinton tyranny’

Skyrocketing Obamacare fines called ‘definition of insanity’

Trump Wins By Landslide-Polls 100% Manufactured-Cliff High