Saturday, October 1, 2016

Hand-Off Of Internet Control Complete

Obama’s handing off Internet to China Controlled UN ITU now a fait accompli

Welcome to Day 1 of the World Wide Web under new—foreign—management.

As quickly as you could say Barry Soetoro the Internet was all but officially stamped ‘Made in China’ at midnight last night.
No notice of the dramatic change was made by the New York Times, Washington Post or any of the other mainstream media power brokers.
But Andrea Zelinski of the Houston Chronicle did report at 7:20 p.m., Friday that a federal judge had rejected Attorney General Ken Paxton’s 11th-hour attempt to keep the internet address book under U.S. control:

“A federal judge on Friday rejected Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to block an Obama administration plan to allow a contract with a nonprofit that manages the internet’s address book to expire.
“U.S. District Judge George C. Hanks Jr. turned down the request by Paxton and attorneys general from Arizona, Oklahoma and Nevada, saying they had relied on “hearsay” about possible repercussions of the contract’s expiration. The case, he ruled, lacked enough evidence to convince the court that harm would come from giving up oversight of the nonprofit.”

To the judge Obama turning ‘the peoples Internet’ over to the Peoples Republic of China-controlled United Nations International Telecommunications Union (ITU) is a matter of “hearsay”.
Nothing to see here, folks, just move along.

“The issue, which has garnered attention from U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz and Attorney General Ken Paxton, concerns fears that the federal government’s decision to let a contract with the non-profit Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers expire could jeopardize government websites. ICANN manages the internet domain naming system, which is what allows users to locate websites. (Houston Chronicle).
“The contract expires at midnight Friday. 

“The court heard oral arguments Friday afternoon on the eleventh-hour lawsuit filed by late Wednesday. 
“During the hearing, Hanks said he was concerned whether his court has jurisdiction over the matter, and whether there was enough evidence of negative consequences that would result from the ending contract. 
“Attorneys representing Texas argued there is no getting control and oversight on the internet address book once the contract ends.
Lawyers representing the federal government contend the plaintiffs have “not one scintilla of evidence” something adverse would happen to the governments’ websites.
“Earlier this year, the Obama administration decided to allow the contract to expire and let ICANN become fully independent. Cruz attempted to include language blocking the move in the stopgap funding bill Congress approved Wednesday, but that language was stripped out before the measure was passed.
“Cruz and Paxton had argued that removing federal oversight of ICANN would give authoritarian regimes like Russia, China, and Iran the ability to interfere with “what should be a free and open internet.”
“We’re disappointed with the ruling,” Paxton spokesman Marc Rylander said. “It’s a dire day in our country when the president is allowed to unilaterally give away America’s pioneering role in ensuring that the internet remains a place where free expression can flourish. We will continue to weigh our options as the suit moves forward.”

Why Cruz and Paxton waited until two days before the ICANN contract was to expire remains unknown.
They may feel “disappointed” but patriots the world over who get their news online feel owned.
Here at Canada Free Press we take courage in knowing that Patriots for America sent out this message at 11 p.m., EDT last night in a post by ‘Old Rooster’: “The people are watching and awake”.
“Judi McLeod’s columns and The Canadian (sic) Free Press are frequently posted and followed by all our members on Patriots For America.
“Please keep up the great work, we need all the freedom loving voices we can get.
Great job all of you, thanks.”


Mrs.C said...


carol said...

Just wondering what r the chances this site and similar ones being removed and how soon?

Scott said...

Thats a good question..I don't see anything happening immediately and it may be more of a slow change as with so many other things - one site here and there, and over the course of a couple of years things may look very different that what we have grown used to - but thats just speculation...who knows - but it can't be good IMO

Mrs.C said...

Seems to me, just say'n, that this will allow the ac to control, and perpetuate his message of lies across the world when the time comes. As Scripture says, those left behind will believe the big lie.
2 Thessalonians 2:9-12
9.Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 10And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Scott said...

Yea - I agree - in fact so much of what we see today is getting the world ready for the AC's rule. Global finance, world banking, etc..All things under his control...He will have to control the internet for sure.The stage is most definitely being set.

Scott said...

On another note - fortunately most of the people who come here are pretty well grounded and know how to discern the news. If we go back to the days of having nothing but MSM news (before the gathering up) - we all know the lies before they speak them and we have the presence of the HS.

Don't forget - their plans cannot come to fullness until the restrainer is removed- so things can only go so far

Scott said...

Stephen - no one has picked a "date" - there is speculation on the POSSIBILITY of the feast of trumpets being the "season", but even if so, it could happen on any year, not just this year.
Additionally, there is a daily trumpet blast that I believe goes on for 29 days, if I am not mistake, so theoretically it could happen at any point during that process - of after the last trumpet.

So there is no "Date" in play and no one on this site has suggested such.