Saturday, October 29, 2016

Could The U.S. Elections Be Suspended?, Obama Unleashes 'Intervention Teams' To Wage War On 'Ideologies', Russia Will Attack The West If Provoked

Food for thought (has this been the plan all along?)...

Will Barack Obama Delay Or Suspend The Election If Hillary Is Forced Out By The New FBI Email Investigation?

Just when it looked like Hillary Clinton was poised to win the 2016 election, the FBI has thrown a gamechanger into the mix. On Friday, FBI Director James Comey announced that his agency has discovered new emails related to Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information that they had not previously seen. According to the Associated Press, the newly discovered emails “did not come from her private server”, but instead were found when the FBI started going through electronic devices that belonged to top Clinton aide Huma Abedin and her husband Anthony Weiner.  The FBI has been looking into messages of a sexual nature that Weiner had exchanged with a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina, and that is why they originally seized those electronic devices.  According to the Washington Post, the “emails were found on a computer used jointly by both Weiner and his wife, top Clinton aide Huma Abedin, according to a person with knowledge of the inquiry”, and according to some reports there may be “potentially thousands” of emails on the computer that the FBI did not have access to previously.  Even though there are less than two weeks to go until election day, this scandal has the potential to possibly force Clinton out of the race, and if that happens could Barack Obama delay or suspend the election until a replacement candidate can be found?
At this point, we do not know what is contained in these emails.  But without a doubt Huma Abedin is Hillary Clinton’s closest confidant, and I have always felt that she was Clinton’s Achilles heel.  Journalist Carl Bernstein (of Watergate fame) is fully convinced that the FBI would have never made this move unless something significant had already been discovered

We don’t know what this means yet except that it’s a real bombshell. And it is unthinkable that the Director of the FBI would take this action lightly, that he would put this letter forth to the Congress of the United States saying there is more information out there about classified e-mails and call it to the attention of congress unless it was something requiring serious investigation. So that’s where we are…
Is it a certainty that we won’t learn before the election? I’m not sure it’s a certainty we won’t learn before the election.
If the FBI has indeed found something explosive, would they actually charge her with a crime right before the election?

It is possible, but we also have to remember that government agencies (including the FBI) tend to move very, very slowly.  If there are thousands of emails, it is going to take quite a while to sift through them all.  And of course Barack Obama has lots of ways that he could influence, delay or even shut down the investigation.
So those that are counting on this to be the miracle that Donald Trump needsshould not count their chickens before they hatch.
But if Hillary Clinton were to be forced out of the race by this FBI investigation, the Democrats would have to decide on a new candidate, and that would take time.  The following is from a U.S. News & World Report article that examined what would happen if one of the candidates was forced out of the race for some reason…

If Clinton were to fall off the ticket, Democratic National Committee members would gather to vote on a replacement. DNC members acted as superdelegates during this year’s primary and overwhelmingly backed Clinton over boat-rocking socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
DNC spokesman Mark Paustenbach says there currently are 445 committee members – a number that changes over time and is guided by the group’s bylaws, which give membership to specific officeholders and party leaders and hold 200 spots for selection by states, along with an optional 75 slots DNC members can choose to fill.
But the party rules for replacing a presidential nominee merely specify that a majority of members must be present at a special meeting called by the committee chairman. The meeting would follow procedures set by the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee and proxy voting would not be allowed.

It would be extremely challenging to get a majority of the members of the Democratic National Committee together on such short notice.  If Clinton were to drop out next week, it would be almost impossible for this to happen before election day.
In such a scenario, Barack Obama may attempt to invoke his emergency powers.  Since the election would not be “fair” until the Democrats have a new candidate, he could try to delay or suspend the election.  There would be a lot of controversy as to whether this is legal or not, but Barack Obama has not let the U.S. Constitution stop him in the past.
So if Hillary is forced out of the race by this investigation, Barack Obama and the Democrats will want to delay or suspend the election for as long as possible if they can.
At this point there is probably not a high probability that such a scenario will play out, but in this crazy election year we have already seen that just about anything can happen.

A year after the dictator-dominated United Nations declared war on “ideologies” such as “anti-Muslim bigotry” and opposition to mass immigration, the White House cooked up a fresh version of the Obama administration's national plotto supposedly prevent people from adopting unapproved ideologies. The controversial scheme aims to deploy “community-based” teams of “mental health” workers, teachers, law enforcers, social service employees, “faith leaders,” and others to supposedly stop the spread of ideologies that Obama claims can be dangerous or violent.

Analysts and critics of the White House plan, though, warned that Obama's supposed attack on “violent ideologies” was in reality a thinly veiled assault on conservatives and political opponents of his agenda to “fundamentally transform” the United States. Indeed, almost from the start of his term, the Obama administration was remarkably candid in targeting conservatives, libertarians, patriots, veterans, pro-life activists, nationalists, and others as “extremists” and even potential terrorists. Various Obama bureaucracies disgorged a steady stream of propaganda painting hundreds of millions of mainstream Americans as the enemy merely for their religious or political views.

 “The policy aims to prevent conversions to all violent ideologies,” Reuters reporter Julia Edwards added, citing the document, which still does not appear to have been released publicly. It was not immediately clear what constitutional or statutory authority the White House imagines it possesses to police people's ideologies, or to hijack local governments to interfere in people's personal beliefs.  

If targets of Obama's “community-based intervention teams” do not abandon the prohibited ideology through "mental health" and other interventions, “law enforcement” will be brought in to use more coercive measures. And if a person is believed to “pose a threat” or be “capable of committing a crime,” law-enforcement action will be taken, the policy states. In other words, “law-enforcement” action begins before a crime has even been committed — even before a target plots or conspires to commit a crime, which is of course already a crime in and of itself. Literally everyone is “capable” of committing a crime. The implications of the developments should be triggering alarm bells nationwide.    
The increasingly politicized and lawless Justice Department and “Homeland Security” Department also have a big role to play in the new plan, according to media reports. Among other schemes, they will be super-charging their ideological propaganda campaigns, using taxpayer funding to illegally promote Obama's ideology under the guise of countering ideologies Obama and the establishment disagree with and paint as violent.
As The New American reported last year, in the interest of defeating allegedly extreme ideologies with “better ideas,” Obama touted some of his administration's policies at a UN summit announcing a global jihad against ideologies such as what the UN described as “anti-Muslim bigotry” in a press release. Among other schemes, he pointed to “efforts to discredit ISIL’s propaganda, especially online,” an apparent reference to his recently unveiled “Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications,” a federal propaganda machine led by Muslim Brotherhood-linked Islamist Rashad Hussain.
Under the new policy, federal prosecutors working for the increasingly radical DOJ will also put together “after-school programs” to shape children's ideologies. Other recently unveiled Obama “extremism” plans also call for conscripting school teachers to seek out students with unapproved ideologies and report them to Big Brother for further scrutiny. The warning signs the FBI told teachers to look for included non-approval of homosexuality, Islam, and more. The leaked FBI document also decried what it referred to as “violent propaganda,” suggesting an increasingly unhinged federal government now literally equates speech with violence.
In other words, it appears that the federal government is now officially and openly waging all-out war on the God-given freedoms protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These include free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and more — some of the most fundamental liberties; indeed, freedoms that the government was actually created to protect. 

Is there any real evidence to this global agenda and can it really be tied into a luciferian cult like goal? The answer is easy to find and even may shock you the people who have openly called for this.  The list is long and just as prestigious. Before I give you their take and quotes, let’s define what the two are and how they are related.
One thing is for sure. It is a global government that controls the military, monetary system, social, economies, and even religion of people. That is the scary part in it as it takes away the free will of man and the sovereignty on nations and individuals. It is a highly controlling form of government that is not optional in participation. This must be stopped if freedom and liberties are to be secured.
Now to what I find the truly shocking part in this and that is the men and women who have called for this form of government. It couldn’t be members of a sovereign Republic like America, could it? Yes, and it has been many in number. Leaders, academia members, banking cartels, financiers, and our very own elected officials have stated that they not only want it, but say it is a “must” to continue our “safety.” This is anything but a safe way to maintain a Republic and individual rights.

I first became aware of the term “New World Order” when President George H.W. Bush made his now famous speech on the subject. He made it in front of the nation, on television, and hardly went noticed. Hearing the words for myself I was floored. I couldn’t believe that this was said from the mouth of not only a self-confessed Christian, but a President of the United States. He has made statements regarding the New World Order many times. Let’s look at a couple.

“The ‘affirmative task’ before us is to create a New World Order.” – VP Joe Biden, speech Import Export Bank, April 5, 2013.
“Each of us has the hope to build a New World Order.” – President Richard Nixon, Hangzhou, China, February 1972.
“We are moving toward a New World Order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” – Mikhail Gorbachev, 1987.
“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian initiation.” – David Spangler, Director of U.N. Planetary Initiative, one of the founding fathers of the New Age movement.
“I think that his [Obama’s] task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a New World Order can be reached.” – Henry Kissinger CNBC 2008.
As I have stated in the above part of this article, there are literally hundreds of quotes pertaining to their thoughts and goals of the New World Order, but I believe this can give us a solid and accurate base to build upon. As we can see it is global, authoritarian, and not voluntary.

So what does all this mean? Wait, we still need to define and explain what the Luciferian agenda is and how the two, together, are one. You will see that the New World Order is based on Luciferian goals, agendas, and globalism using our military, economy, and foreign policy to carry it out. That cannot be accepted in a free and open society.

Russia will attack the West if provoked in Syria, the UK's former ambassador in Moscow
 said, as he warned of "the most dangerous situation in our relations I have ever seen."
 It comes with relations between the West and Russia at their worst point since the Cold War.
US Presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton has backed imposing a "no fly zone" in Syria,
where Russia is accused of deliberately bombing civilians, while Russian President
Vladimir Putin warned of "problems" if the US continued its "confrontation" with Russia.
Sir Anthony Brenton, who served as Britain's ambassador to Russia from 2004 to 2008, said that escalating tensions could result in open conflict with Russia.

Sir Anthony Brenton, who served as Britain's ambassador to Russia from 2004 to 2008,
 said that escalating tensions could result in open conflict with Russia.
"They are behaving as toughly and aggressively as I have ever seen them," Brenton
 wrote in the Daily Mirror.
"If we act on Syria in any way that could escalate to a Russian attack, they are
 signalling as clearly as they can that they would retaliate."
Russia recently revealed that it has deployed nuclear capable missiles to its Baltic
 enclave in Kaliningrad, and completed a week long nuclear war exercise reportedly
involving 40 million civilians. It has also cancelled a weapons grade plutonium agreement
with the US,
and unveiled the new Satan II intercontinental ballistic missile, capable of
obliterating an area the size of France.
In response Nato has deployed 4,000 troops in eastern Europe and the Baltics.


Dutch Treat said...

hellRegarding the latest E/Mail bombshell, I have no idea how it will play out. However we do know from God's Word what the end result will be, and would urge everyone reading this blog to keep their focus on that; because the only winners in this process will be those who've confessed their sins and accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Thanks again Scott for being our watchman on the walls; and thank you Jesus for providing a way out of this mess.

ally said...

I urge everyone to participate in this week of national repentance and pray like you have never prayed before cuz it's going to get really bumpy without the Blood OF Christ covering this nation. Onward z Christian Soldiers!!!
PS at Paul Begleys New site there is an interview with a sheriff from sw Va who died and boy did he get a message from God. Short and sweet and easy to understand. I like when God is Crystal clear, ambiguity is not good for me. As an ex hospice nurse, I totally believe what he had to say. Check it out! (Scott, there is a special message there for all us watchers! ;) you will understand)
2 minute warning indeed, our hubby awaits!
Love you all!!!!
Sweet tea at the tree of life time!!!!! Yeeeeeessss!