Tuesday, October 11, 2016

1984 Here And Now, Voter Fraud Then And Now Will Determine Upcoming Election




We always knew this was going on, but now there is definitive proof. 1984 is here. The Tribulation won't be far away now. The bottom line is - the globalists will have their way. They will "win"we know that in advance. They will have the ultimate socialist/progressive/communist fantasy: world government, a charasmatic  world leader. Everything. Event those crazy obstructionist Christians will have been removed. Everything they have ever wanted and dreamed of will become a reality. 

Good luck to them. We also know the outcome of their utopia: 

"For then will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now - and never to be equaled again."(Matthew 24)








The Wikileaks email dumps on John Podesta are so packed with bombshells about media collusion with the Clintons, I can't even process them all. So I'm including some of the highlights as headline links below.

The bottom line of what's coming out so far is that the entire mainstream media is controlled and scripted by the Clintons and democrats. In other words, the "mainstream" media is now nothing more than an extension of the state.

Democrats, the Clintons, the federal government and the mainstream media have all merged into one grand orgy of collusion, spewing disinformation and lies to keep their most adored criminals (Obama and the Clintons) in power while destroying anyone who challenges the status quo.

As you'll see in the stories linked below, the Clinton campaign tells the media what to print, what questions to ask, what to censor and what to conclude. Journalists working for CNBC, CNN, NYT, etc., are not allowed to engage in anything resembling real journalism. Their stories are scripted in advance. Everything is orchestrated and engineered. The game is rigged at every level, just like I said in my viral article EVERYTHING IS RIGGED: Medicine, science, elections, the media, money, education, search engines, social media... you are living in a fabricated fairy tale.

Just a few of the bombshells from the Podesta email leaks revealing stunning media collusion with the Clinton campaign



Unethical links between CNBC and Clinton campaign:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-10/ema...

Damning Bernie Sanders info leaked to the Clinton campaign by DNC chief Donna Brazile:
http://observer.com/2016/10/breaking-dnc-chi...

NYT gave Hillary Clinton VETO POWER on all quotes (the paper confirms everything with Hillary before printing it):
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/new-york-...

NYT busted giving questions to Bill Clinton ahead of time:
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-r...

CNN rigged post-debate focus group to "coach" the answers for Hillary:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/10/cnn-possib...

Multiple media organizations were ordered to "destroy Trump":
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/10/oreill...

NYT / CNBC John Harwood was debate moderator and also a Clinton campaign advisor:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/nytcnbcs-j...

Boston Globe coordinated with Hillary's campaign to "maximize her presence":
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/emails-bos...

Hillary Clinton pays an army of online trolls to promote her (and attack Natural News):
http://stream.org/astroturf-outrage-machine-...

Hillary Clinton cued on when to smile during debates:
http://heatst.com/politics/wikileaks-hillary...






Major Election Fraud Alert—Is This How They Are Going to Steal the Election From Donald Trump?




Every ounce of effort that ordinary Americans have put into getting Donald Trump elected could be completely wasted if we allow them to steal the election.
If you have confidence in the integrity of our elections, that confidence will be shaken by the time you are done reading this article, because I am about to share some information with you that is absolutely astounding. Recently, I showed you that dead people are being registered to vote right now and that they have been voting in elections across the country for years. I also showed you that illegal immigrants have been voting in important swing states such as Virginia and Pennsylvania. But all of that pales in comparison to the evidence of systematic election fraud that we witnessed on election day in 2012.
Because Mitt Romney threw in the towel very early on election night in 2012, very little scrutiny was given to the actual voting results. But if Romney had been willing to fight, there was actually quite a bit of evidence that the election was potentially stolen from him.

According to the Election Protection Coalition, voters all across America reported over 70,000 voting problems by 5 p.m. Eastern time on election day in 2012. In many instances, voters that were attempting to vote for Mitt Romney were having their votes switched to Barack Obama by the voting machines. We are going to look at some examples of this phenomenon below.
In particular, we want to focus on the swing states, because that is where most of the voting irregularities seem to have popped up. If you are going to steal an election, you don't really care too much about the really "red states" or the really "blue states." Rather, the key would be to shift enough votes in the tightly contested swing states to ensure a victory for your candidate. And so let's take a look at what happened in some of the most important swing states during the last election.


Ohio
During election night in 2012, the pundits breathlessly proclaimed that it was all going to come down to Ohio. They told us that if Mitt Romney was going to have any chance of winning the election that he had to win Ohio, and so that was the state to watch more than any other.
One of the counties where Barack Obama really needed to run up votes was in Cuyahoga County. But Barack Obama didn't just solidly win in Cuyahoga County. In fact, there were 16 precincts were Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote.
Yes, you read that correctly.
Earlier today I went to the official Cuyahoga County website, and the results from the last election are still up. The following are the vote totals for Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in the precincts where Mitt Romney did not get any votes...

0154 CLEVELAND -02-Q: 542 – 0
0192 CLEVELAND -04-L: 388 – 0
0204 CLEVELAND -05-E: 597 – 0
0205 CLEVELAND -05-F: 483 – 0
0206 CLEVELAND -05-G: 257 – 0
0219 CLEVELAND -05-T: 386 – 0
0228 CLEVELAND -06-H: 405 – 0
0232 CLEVELAND -06-L: 70 – 0
0233 CLEVELAND -06-M: 419 – 0
0241 CLEVELAND -06-U: 118 – 0
0248 CLEVELAND -07-F: 361 – 0
0273 CLEVELAND -08-J: 472 – 0
0280 CLEVELAND -08-Q: 49 – 0
0285 CLEVELAND -09-B: 414 – 0
0288 CLEVELAND -09-E: 478 – 0
0523 EAST CLEVELAND -04-C: 486 – 0

There were also a whole host of precincts in Cuyahoga County where Mitt Romney received just one or two votesOverall, Barack Obama won more than 99 percent of the vote in more than 100 precincts in just this one county.
How in the world does that happen?
Well, I think that what ordinary voters were telling reporters on election day in Ohio gives us a big clue. According to Fox News, there were voters in Ohio that said that they tried to vote for Romney, but the voting machines kept switching their votes to Obama.
"I don't know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me," said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens. 
Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.
"I went to vote and I got right in the middle of Romney's name," Stevens told Fox News, saying that she was certain to put her finger directly on her choice for the White House.
She said that the first time she pushed "Romney," the machine marked "Obama."
So she pushed Romney again. Obama came up again. Then it happened a third time.
"Maybe you make a mistake once, but not three times," she told Fox News.

At the time, Fox News also reported that similar things were happening in Nevada, North Carolina and Texas, but once election day faded from memory nobody really seemed to care about these incidents anymore.


Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania is another very important swing state, and as the 2012 election approached the Romney campaign was actually somewhat optimistic that they may have a shot of winning the state.
And it turned out that Mitt Romney did win 55 out of the 67 counties in Pennsylvania, but he still managed to lose the entire state by a significant margin because of the crazy vote totals that Obama ran up in the urban areas.
If you can believe it, there were 59 voting divisions in the city of Philadelphia where Mitt Romney did not get one single vote.
The combined vote total for those 59 voting divisions was 19,605 for Barack Obama and 0 for Mitt Romney.
The odds of that happening by random chance are so low that they are not even worth mentioning.
So how does something like that happen?

Well, the overall voter turnout rate in the city of Philadelphia was approximately 60 percent on election day in 2012. But in the areas of the city where Republican poll watchers were illegally removed, the voter turnout rate was over 90 percent and Barack Obama received more than 99 percent of the vote.
You would think that the Republican Party should have screamed bloody murder about this, but instead they did absolutely nothing.
And once again, voting machines were switching votes from Mitt Romney to Barack Obama in Pennsylvania. The following was reported by WND at the time.

It was in Upper Macungie Township, near Allentown, Pa., where an auditor, Robert Ashcroft, was dispatched by Republicans to monitor the vote on Election Day. He said the software he observed would "change the selection back to default – to Obama."
He said that happened in about 5 percent to 10 percent of the votes.
He said the changes appeared to have been made by a software program.
Ashcroft said the format for computer programming has a default status, and in this case it appeared to be designating a vote for Obama each time it went to default.

So would Mitt Romney have won the state of Pennsylvania if the voting had been fair?
We may never know the answer to that question.
Florida
In the critical swing state of Florida, there were also a number of key precincts where Barack Obama received 99 percent of the vote. The following was reported by Pundit Press:
How exactly did he accomplish this? Well, in part thanks to Broward County Precincts L024 to L029 (though I'm sure it's all a coincidence that this happened to precincts all in order).
In those precincts combined, all in order, Mr. Obama won over 99% of the vote, defeating Mitt Romney 5,392 to... 54. Golly, how lucky! This especially impressive because in precincts L019-L022 (L023 doesn't exist) Mr. Romney did over 14 times better than in L024-L029, and the precinct after, did 30 times better.

Most Americans have never even heard any of this information. And remember, in this article we are looking at just a few examples from the most critical swing states. The truth is that these kinds of "statistical anomalies" were happening all over the nation.


Virginia
In the important swing state, Virginia, a poll watcher named Dara Fox tried to sound the alarm about rampant voting fraud, and it should have made front page news all over the country. The following is what Fox told WMAL radio about what went down:
  • That it appeared that voters for Obama were being bused in.
  • That many of them could not speak English at all.
  • That many of them could not even tell poll workers the correct address on their identification cards.
  • That many people were voting more than once at that same polling station throughout the day.




Colorado
It appears that funny business was happening in swing states out west as well. Somehow, 10 counties in the key swing state of Colorado had a voter registration rate of more than 100 percent on Election Day in 2012.
Theoretically this is impossible. If all of the voting age people in your county registered to vote you could have a voter registration rate of 100 percent, but to go beyond that means that something is seriously wrong.
And yesterday I did show that authorities in Colorado have discovered that there is a "very serious" pattern of dead people casting votes in the state that goes back for many years.
This is why states should be allowed to require photo identification at voting locations. The integrity of our voting process has been compromised over and over again, and anyone who tries to steal an election is committing a crime against all of us.
It is a fact that Barack Obama did not win in a single state that required a photo I.D. to vote in 2012.
So what would the election results have looked like if all 50 states had required a photo I.D. to vote?




2 comments:

Mike Lupica said...

Over 25 yrs ago alex jones saw this coming & warned people,my brothers & sister's in christ though he was crazy!Jim Tucker as well.Alex Jones is a red blooded American

Mike Lupica said...

Alex jones End Game