Monday, August 15, 2016

The North American Union Back In View - Depending On The Election Outcome


...which of course has already been determined. I have always believed that the underlying reason for open borders is for the coming North American Union. With every issue you have to look deeper than the superficial arguments. Taken another step further, one can't help but wonder if the NAU will end up being one of the 10 kings, if the world is moving in that direction:


Hillary Plans Steps Toward North American Union If Elected When Selected


[Editorial changes to the title mine]



Hillary Promises a New Government Agency to Open Up Our Borders … Hillary’s open borders policy will reach fruition if she becomes president. In fact, she said … she is going to open up a new government agency to help illegal aliens and get them on a path to citizenship. She has already said that in her first 100 days, she will go much further than Barack Obama. – Independent Sentinel




Months ago, we predicted that the North American Union would return as a political issue in this presidential race. Hillary intends to move in this direction if elected.
Once president, she will reportedly take emphatic steps to do to the US what has been done in Europe: Combine countries in a larger, streamlined “partnership.” In this case the countries are Canada, Mexico and the US.
We explained long ago, that a signal to bring back this disastrous idea was Trump’s popular and determined intention to oppose easy migration from Mexico to the US. George Soros responded with funding for an amorphous Latin-American movement aimed at greater integration.


Top Mexican officials seized the opportunity to re-position Mexico in ways to support additional coalescing. You can see our latest article on the topic HERE: “As Predicted, North American Union Returns Under Guise of ‘Greater Integration.”


This surely constitutes a victory for directed history. The “union” has re-emerged as a seemingly natural evolution of political discussion. And as we’ve explained numerous times, we’re not sure that Trump has any direct culpability. He may simply be stating and restating deeply held beliefs – as he should.


But his stance surely irritated the issue.  Once killed by popular resistance, it is now front and center though the media has not yet fully focused on it. That will come in time, certainly if Hillary is elected.


More from the Sentinel:



Clinton’s campaign website states that, as President, she will “defend President Obama’s executive actions to provide deportation relief for DREAMers and parents of Americans and lawful residents.”
Meaning, Clinton will allow millions of illegal immigrants to remain in the United States, receive work permits to legally fill American jobs, and get access to federal benefits paid for by U.S. taxpayers.
In addition, Clinton’s website says she will “extend those actions to additional persons with sympathetic cases if Congress refuses to act.”


Clinton will work on the immigration issue as a top priority and reportedly will try to create an Office of Immigrant Affairs for the White House to support her expanded initiatives.
The article quotes her as saying, “I am hoping that the outcome of the election, which I am working hard to ensure a victory, will send a clear message to our Republican friends that it’s time for them to quit standing in the way of immigration reform,”
Her campaign is also trying to register three million more voters to ensure greater support for her platform and a win in November.

At the same time as Hillary’s intentions to promote greater integration are becoming evident, News With Views posted a far more a more comprehensive report on where her regime might head.
The article HERE is entitled “Get Ready for FEMA Regions For the North American Union” and contends that the ultimate plan is to “do with away with the 50 states and create FEMA regions.”
The report quotes Parag Khanna, a contributor for the NYTimes, who believes the US would “thrive more if the government did away with the states and created regions.” You can see his article HERE.

Here, from News With Views:
… The entire plan for seven states bases itself on the fact that some states are failing while others have already bounced back after the 2008 financial crisis.  However, exposing the real motives behind the crisis shows that this agenda for seven states is all a part of a larger scheme to further dwindle the individual rights of Americans, and to do away with borders and boundaries …
The article points out that a FEMA-like organization of states into seven regions also emerges under martial law. And this in turn corresponds to certain elements of the “United Nations agenda for 2030.”
 The infrastructure for a merged state is reportedly proceeding via several cross-country highways being expanded between Canada and the US that may connect Mexico as well. An initial  highway beginning in Mexico was blocked, but other construction has continued, see HERE.
Conclusion: It is perfectly likely that under Hillary the concept of a North American Union, long denied and even mocked as “conspiracy theory,” will continue to take shape and that some aspects could even become a concrete reality.


No comments: