Friday, May 22, 2026

"Drills Are Intended To Send A Signal": Russia Holds Massive Nuclear Drills On Land, Sea And Air Alongside Belarus

"Drills Are Intended To Send A Signal": Russia Holds Massive Nuclear Drills On Land, Sea And Air Alongside Belarus
 TYLER DURDEN

Trucks carrying intercontinental ballistic missiles rumbled over forest roads, atomic-powered submarines set sail from Arctic and Pacific ports, and crews scrambled into warplanes as Russia and neighboring Belarus held the final stage of their joint nuclear drills Thursday.

Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed the maneuvers in a video call with his Belarusian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko. “The use of nuclear weapons is an extreme, exceptional measure for ensuring the national security of our states,” Putin said, according to AP.

Lukashenko earlier inspected Russian short-range nuclear-capable Iskander ballistic missiles at a military unit involved in the drills and declared: “I dreamed about this machine a long time ago.”

The three-day drills that began Tuesday come amid a surge in Ukrainian drone strikes. including on Moscow’s suburbs that killed three people and damaged several buildings and industrial facilities. The strikes made it harder for officials in the Kremlin to cast the conflict in Ukraine — now in its fifth year — as something so distant that it doesn’t affect the daily routines of Russian civilians.

Drills involve wide array of nuclear weapons

Russia’s Defense Ministry said the exercise involved 64,000 troops, over 200 missile launchers, more than 140 aircraft, 73 surface warships and 13 submarines, including eight armed with nuclear-tipped ICBMs. The drills focused on the “preparation and use of nuclear forces under the threat of aggression,” it said.

The maneuvers also practice cooperation with Belarus, an ally that hosts Russian nuclear weapons. Russian arsenals in Belarus include its latest intermediate range nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile system.


Along with nuclear-tipped ground- and submarine-launched ICBMs, the maneuvers featured a broad assortment of short- and medium-range weapons.

Unlike the intercontinental missiles that can destroy entire cities, tactical nuclear weapons intended for use against troops on the battlefield are less powerful. They include aerial bombs and warheads for short- and medium-range missiles and artillery munitions.

The Defense Ministry said the Russian armed forces test-fired Yars and Sineva ICBMs, as well as medium-range sea-launched Zircon and air-launched Kinzhal missiles, noting that all missiles hit their designated practice targets. Belarusian troops test-fired a short-range Iskander ballistic missile inside Russia.

Putin has repeatedly reminded the world about Moscow’s nuclear arsenals since the war in Ukraine started in February 2022 to deter the West from ramping up support for Kyiv.

In 2024, the Kremlin adopted a revised nuclear doctrine, noting that any nation’s conventional attack on Russia that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack on his country. That threat was clearly aimed at discouraging the West from allowing Ukraine to strike Russia with longer-range weapons and appears to significantly lower the threshold for the possible use of Moscow’s nuclear arsenal.

The revised doctrine also placed Belarus under the Russian nuclear umbrella. Putin has said that Moscow will retain control of its nuclear weapons deployed in Belarus, which borders Ukraine and NATO members Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, but would allow its ally to select the targets in case of conflict.

Drills come as Ukrainian drones spotted in the Baltics

The maneuvers are held amid an increase in drone activity in the Baltic nations. On Tuesday, a NATO jet shot down a Ukrainian drone over southern Estonia. Ukraine apologized for that “unintended incident,” without specifying what had happened.

On Wednesday, an emergency announcement about a drone flying over Belarus prompted residents of the Lithuanian capital of Vilnius, including top officials and lawmakers, to take shelter and led to a brief closure of its airport.


Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service said Tuesday that Ukraine is preparing drone attacks against Russia from the territory of the Baltic countries and warned of retaliation It alleged Ukrainian military personnel had been deployed to Latvia and warned that the country’s membership in NATO wouldn’t protect it from “just retribution.” Latvian authorities said the allegation was not true.

Last month, the Russian Defense Ministry published a list of factories in Europe that it said were involved in producing drones and their components for Ukraine. It warned that attacks on Russia involving drones manufactured in Europe are fraught with “unpredictable consequences.”

Some commentators interpreted the bellicose statements from Moscow and this week’s exercise featuring short- and medium-range nuclear weapons capable of reaching targets in Europe as part of Kremlin efforts to discourage Western allies from bolstering support for Ukraine.

Asked what message the nuclear exercise was intended to send, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov responded that “any drills are intended to send a signal,” but wouldn’t elaborate.




M4.4 earthquake triggers seismic swarm at Italy’s Campi Flegrei caldera


M4.4 earthquake triggers seismic swarm at Italy’s Campi Flegrei caldera


A shallow M4.4 earthquake struck the Campi Flegrei caldera west of Naples at 03:50 UTC on May 21, 2026, beginning a seismic swarm in the Gulf of Pozzuoli.


The Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (INGV) said the earthquake had a depth of about 3 km (1.9 miles) and was the strongest event in today’s sequence. The swarm consisted of 12 earthquakes before it was announced finished at 12:01 UTC. The events were concentrated offshore between the Pozzuoli and Bacoli sectors of the caldera.


The main shock was felt across the Naples area, prompting local checks and precautionary closures. Officials at the Municipality of Naples ordered precautionary school closures in the Bagnoli-Fuorigrotta “Red Zone” while inspections are carried out on public and private buildings.


The sequence occurred during the continuing bradyseismic unrest at Campi Flegrei. INGV previously stated that about 23 000 earthquakes were recorded during the current bradyseismic crisis through 2024.



Campi Flegrei (Phlegraean Fields) is a large volcanic caldera west of Naples, spanning about 12 km (7.5 miles) across and partly extending beneath the Gulf of Pozzuoli. The volcanic field contains more than 20 craters and volcanic edifices, including the Solfatara crater, and sits within one of Europe’s most densely populated volcanic regions.


The caldera formed through two major explosive eruptions, including the Campanian Ignimbrite eruption about 39 000 years ago and the Neapolitan Yellow Tuff eruption about 15 000 years ago, while its most recent eruption formed Monte Nuovo in 1538.


About 3 million people live in the wider Naples metropolitan area, while several hundred thousand residents live within or immediately adjacent to the Campi Flegrei caldera, making the area one of the world’s highest volcanic-risk urban environments.






Proposed Global AI Body: Another Step Toward One-World Governance?


Proposed Global AI Body: Another Step Toward One-World Governance?
PNW STAFF



The rise of artificial intelligence has sparked legitimate fears about cyberwarfare, mass surveillance, deepfakes, economic disruption, and even autonomous weapons. In response, a growing number of world leaders, tech executives, and international organizations are now calling for a centralized global body to regulate AI development. On the surface, it sounds responsible. After all, who wouldn't want safeguards against dangerous technology?

But beneath the polished language about "global cooperation" and "shared standards" lies something far larger: another accelerating step toward global governance, where unelected international bodies gain increasing authority over nations, economies, speech, and eventually human behavior itself.

This week, OpenAI openly backed the creation of a U.S.-led global AI governance organization that would include communist China as a member. Chris Lehane, OpenAI's vice president of global affairs, suggested the body could function similarly to the International Atomic Energy Agency, which establishes international standards around nuclear energy.

The proposal is being framed as a way to create "safer" and "more resilient" AI systems worldwide. Yet history teaches that international institutions rarely remain neutral guardians of freedom. Instead, they often become political tools shaped by ideological pressure, global elites, and shifting cultural agendas.

Americans have already watched this happen repeatedly with the United Nations itself.

Now imagine those same global dynamics applied to artificial intelligence.

AI is not merely another technology. It is rapidly becoming the infrastructure layer for society itself. Whoever controls AI standards may eventually influence banking access, digital communications, online speech, employment systems, military applications, healthcare decisions, surveillance networks, and even what information populations are allowed to see or share.


That is why the push for a global AI authority deserves intense scrutiny.

The language surrounding these proposals often sounds eerily familiar: "collective security," "global coordination," "shared responsibility," and "harmonized standards." These phrases may appear harmless, but they almost always involve shifting power away from individual nations and toward centralized international frameworks. Americans should ask a simple question: who ultimately decides what constitutes "safe" AI?

Would biblical views on gender, marriage, or human life eventually be classified by global AI systems as "harmful" or "dangerous misinformation"? Would pro-Israel perspectives be deprioritized by international moderation standards shaped by anti-Israel governments? Would Christian ministries someday find themselves digitally restricted by algorithms trained under "global consensus" rules?


Around the world, governments are already experimenting with digital censorship systems, biometric surveillance, facial recognition databases, and online speech controls. China's infamous social credit system has shown how technology can be used to monitor and shape human behavior on a national scale. Western nations, meanwhile, increasingly pressure social media companies to suppress content deemed "harmful" or "misleading."

AI dramatically amplifies those capabilities.

An advanced global AI governance structure could eventually become the nervous system for a new era of centralized control -- one capable of tracking financial activity, monitoring communications, identifying dissidents, and restricting access to digital systems with unprecedented precision.

For Christians familiar with Bible prophecy, these developments carry chilling implications.

Scripture describes a future world system under the rule of the Antichrist that exercises extraordinary global authority over commerce, allegiance, and human behavior. The book of Revelation specifically warns of a time when people will be required to receive a mark in the right hand or forehead in order to buy or sell.

For years, skeptics mocked such warnings as impossible. How could any government realistically control all global commerce or monitor billions of people?

Today, the technological pieces are rapidly falling into place.

Digital IDs are spreading across multiple nations. Central bank digital currencies are actively being explored worldwide. Biometric payment systems already allow individuals to pay using fingerprints, facial scans, or palm recognition. Artificial intelligence can analyze enormous amounts of behavioral data in real time. Surveillance cameras paired with AI can identify individuals instantly in crowded cities. Financial systems are increasingly becoming fully digital and programmable.

What once sounded futuristic now feels disturbingly plausible.


Putin to Attend BRICS Summit in India



Putin to Attend BRICS Summit in India
Martin Armstrong


The West still refuses to understand what is taking place because they are trapped inside their own propaganda. They actually believed sanctions would isolate Russia, collapse its economy, frighten China, and force the world back under American and European financial dominance. Instead, they accelerated the creation of an entirely new geopolitical order right in front of their eyes.

Now Vladimir Putin is openly traveling to India for the BRICS Summit in September alongside China as if to send a direct message that Russia is not isolated at all. The Kremlin confirmed Putin will attend the summit in New Delhi on September 12–13, and meetings with Xi Jinping are already expected on the sidelines. This is not some hidden backroom alliance anymore. Putin is not hiding. China is not hiding. BRICS is no longer pretending to be merely an economic discussion forum. It is becoming the nucleus of a competing world order.

What the neocons never understood is that power abhors a vacuum. Once the United States began weaponizing SWIFT, freezing foreign reserves, sanctioning entire nations, and threatening secondary sanctions against anyone refusing to comply, the rest of the world began quietly preparing alternatives. You cannot confiscate Russia’s reserves, threaten China daily, sanction Iran, pressure India, and then expect these countries to continue trusting a Western-controlled financial system indefinitely.

BRICS now represents more than 40% of the global population and continues expanding. Iran joined. The UAE joined. Egypt joined. Ethiopia joined. Indonesia joined. Saudi Arabia continues deepening cooperation. Countries lining up outside the door understand exactly where this is going.

Meanwhile Europe is deindustrializing itself in real time while Germany sinks into economic contraction. The United States is drowning in debt while financing endless wars it cannot afford. Yet Russia and China continue increasing bilateral trade, expanding energy agreements, trading increasingly outside the dollar system, and building long-term infrastructure across Eurasia. Putin himself declared that relations between Russia and China have reached an “unprecedented level” of trust and strategic coordination.

The arrogance coming out of Washington and Brussels has blinded them to the historical pattern unfolding. Every reserve currency empire eventually overextends militarily and financially. Spain did it. Britain did it. Rome did it. The mistake is always the same. They begin believing the system cannot function without them. Then the rest of the world slowly builds alternatives.

That is what BRICS really represents. Not simply an alliance against the West, but a rebellion against a financial system increasingly viewed as politically weaponized and unstable. The sanctions regime accelerated the fragmentation of the global economy far faster than anyone in Washington anticipated. Instead of frightening Russia and China apart, they pushed them together permanently

The symbolism of Putin standing openly beside Xi and Modi in New Delhi matters enormously because it demonstrates confidence. The man Western leaders claimed would become isolated is now helping shape an entirely parallel global bloc stretching across energy, trade, commodities, manufacturing, and finance. The world is breaking into competing spheres again, and the political class in the West still seems incapable of accepting that reality.

What a “Multipolar World Order” REALLY Means


Fake Wars & Higher Prices: What a “Multipolar World Order” REALLY Means



This “Multipolar World” has been a political talking point for a long time, but it has been building momentum over the last few years, and noticeably accelerating since the beginning of Donald Trump’s second term.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has been calling for this multipolar order for years, and did so again last week. China’s Xi Jinping regularly does the same, most recently during his trip to South America in February. North Korea’s Kim Jung Il echoed these sentiments in April.

Xi and Putin signed a joint declaration on “building a multipolar world” this morning.

Two weeks ago, in a talk at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz called for“a post-imperial world [and] a resilient rules-based order in a new era of multipolarity”.

In a speech during his trip to China last month, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for “embracing a multipolar world order”:

“What is happening today is not a transfer of hegemony, but an increase in multipolarity — in both power and prosperity,”


Outside of politicians speechifying, the multipolar world order has become the main focus of the international think-tank circuit as well.

In December, the Tony Blair Institute partnered with the JPMorgan Chase International Council to publish a report called “World Rewired: Navigating a Multi-Speed, Multipolar Order”, which concludes in the foreword (written by Blair himself and Jamie Dimon of JPMC):


And then in March, the World Economic Forum published an (exceedingly dull) report titled “The Future of Materials Systems: Cooperation Opportunities in a Multipolar World”, which uses sentences like this…

In a multipolar world, agile interest-based cooperation will be decisive in shaping resilient, productive and sustainable materials systems.

That’s the traditional circle in which “multipolarity” is most discussed. Reports for alphabet agencies and non-profits, market predictions and risk assessments. Academic language that camouflages meaning in layers of surplus verbiage.

But multipolarity is not just the pet subject of presidents and thinktanks, it is a regular talking point across the media landscape.

…said Council on Foreign Relations publication Foreign Affairs, in December.

The European Times headlines “From unipolarity to multipolar reality – A new world order is fast emerging”, and is rather more measured:




The US/Israeli war with Iran has been blamed for and/or credited with accelerating this long-awaited Imperial decline.

Two weeks ago, The Tehran Times headlines:

How the Iran conflict is catalyzing a multipolar world order

A report from The Middle East Council on Global Affairs frames the war in Iran as the US trying to stop the multipolar world from breaking free:

What is unfolding in Iran is not simply a war over the regional balance of power or nuclear containment. It is an attempt to rupture the geographic core of an emerging multipolar order designed to bypass Western dominance

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace published this

The Iran War Shows the Limits of U.S. Power – If Washington cannot adapt to the ongoing transformations of a multipolar world, its superiority will become a liability.


America’s Empire will fall, and a shiny multipolar new world order will rise in its place, and it’s definitely going to be A Good Thing.

That’s the story.

But that’s all it is, a story.

What is the “multipolar world order”, really?








Things To Come: Famine

6 Months From Global Food Shortages?
Michael Snyder’


We have never faced anything quite like this. Diesel fuel and fertilizer have become far more expensive as a result of the conflict in the Middle East, and extreme weather is playing havoc with crops all over the planet. Here in the United States, we just experienced the driest first three months of a year in recorded history. No, that isn’t an exaggeration. Now a “Super El Niño” is coming, and that means that drought conditions are going to get even worse in many areas of the world. The “Super El Niño” of 1877-1878 resulted in widespread droughts that killed more than 50 million people, and now we are being warned that the upcoming “Super El Niño” could be even worse. Our farmers have never faced a “perfect storm” of this magnitude, and global food production is going to be way down in the months ahead.

The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization is publicly warning that a severe global food crisis could strike about 6 months from now if something really dramatic does not happen…

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz could trigger a severe global food price crisis within six to 12 months unless governments act quickly, the Food and Agriculture Organization warned Wednesday.

Decisions now by farmers and governments on fertilizer use, imports, financing and crop choices will determine whether food prices spike later this year or in early 2027, the agency said.


I don’t know what national governments around the world are supposed to do.

They can’t create fertilizer out of thin air.

Thanks to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran, millions of farmers all over the northern hemisphere didn’t get the fertilizer that they needed for the spring planting season.

UNDP Administrator Alexander De Croo is telling us that as a result “many places in the world will have problems of food shortage” once harvest season arrives…

Food shortages are expected to hit many parts of the world from September or October following a fertilizer production plunge, the U.N. Development Program’s head said on Monday.

“In September, (or) October, many places in the world will have problems of food shortage,” as agricultural production is expected to be much lower following the fertilizer production slump resulting from high oil prices amid Middle East conflicts, UNDP Administrator Alexander De Croo said in an interview in Tokyo.

Even if fertilizer is available, many farmers simply cannot afford it.

In fact, one recent survey discovered that 70 percent of U.S. farmers could not afford to buy all of the fertilizer that they needed for the spring planting season because it has become so expensive.

Meanwhile, diesel has become painfully expensive as well.

Virtually all farm equipment runs on diesel, and as I write this article the average price of a gallon of diesel in the U.S. is sitting at about five and a half dollars.

But in California, the average price of a gallon of diesel has reached nearly seven and a half dollars

According to AAA, the average price for diesel fuel in California is about $7.43 per gallon, which is $2.36 higher compared to last year. In Fresno, prices are slightly higher.

“In Fresno, you’re paying about $6.06 for a gallon of regular gasoline, but you’re paying $7.48 for a gallon of diesel,” Johnson said.

You may not care about what is happening in California, but you should because California produces more fruit and more vegetables than any other state by a very wide margin.

Drought is another major problem that U.S. farmers are dealing with.

In West Texas, the cracks in the ground caused by endless drought are big enough to swallow an entire human hand


Scott Irlbeck crouched in a field of stunted wheat plants in a parched stretch of West Texas and slipped his hand into a crack wide enough to swallow it.

Last autumn, Irlbeck planted a crop that barely grew because rain never came. ​He now hopes his insurance adjuster will declare it a total loss so he will not need to spend money on pricey fuel to harvest it next month.


Coming into this year, the southwestern portion of the nation was experiencing the worst multi-year drought in at least 1,200 years.

And then the first three months of this year were the driest first three months of a year for the entire country ever recorded.

As a result, it is being projected that the winter wheat harvest will be a disaster

Crop estimates underscore just how bad the situation is. Growers will see their smallest wheat crop in terms of production since 1972, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1.56 billion bushels this year, down 21% from 2025. That’s especially harmful to Kansas, one of the top overall producers of wheat in the U.S.

This year, only 22 million acres of winter wheat will be harvested, and the abandonment rate is above 32 percent…

Only 32.4 million acres (13.1 million hectares) of wheat were planted this year to begin with, and harvested acreage hit just 22 million, marking abandonment, which is when farmers stop tending to a crop before harvesting, at slightly above 32% of this year’s wheat crop, according to USDA estimates.

Just think about those numbers for a moment.

Our farmers simply gave up on nearly a third of this year’s winter wheat crop.

Wow.

Looking ahead, we are being told that the number of acres of wheat that U.S. farmers are planting in the spring will be the fewest “since record keeping began in 1919”

U.S. growers were poised to plant the fewest acres of wheat since record keeping began in 1919, as high costs for fertilizer, seeds, and equipment have made it difficult to turn a profit.

In 1919, there were 104 million people living in the United States.

Today, there are more than 340 million people living in the United States.

It doesn’t take a math genius to figure out that we are headed for trouble.

And now a “Super El Niño” is looming

A “Super El Niño” may be on its way and could impact weather in the United States and worldwide for the next several months.

El Niño is described by the National Weather Service (NWS) as “a state where the water temperatures in the Pacific Ocean near the equator become abnormally warm.” These warmer waters trigger significant weather pattern changes across the globe.


One expert is warning that there is approximately a 50 percent chance that this “Super El Niño” will be the most powerful ever recorded…

“I would suggest there is roughly a 50 per cent chance of the event becoming the strongest in the historical record right now,” Paul Roundy, a professor of atmospheric science at the University at Albany, in the US, told BBC Science Focus. “A few weeks ago, I was suggesting maybe 20 per cent.”

In a previous article, I discussed the fact that the “Super El Niño” of 1877-1878 caused widespread global famines that resulted in the deaths of 50 million people.

So how many will die during the “Super El Niño” that will begin later this year?

According to the UN, the number of people around the world there were experiencing acute hunger was already at an all-time record high even before the war with Iran started.

More....


Thursday, May 21, 2026

No Deal Reached, Amid 'Fabricated' Mideast Media Reports; Trump Presses Nuclear Issue & Iran President Says 'Won't Back Down'


No Deal Reached, Amid 'Fabricated' Mideast Media Reports; Trump Presses Nuclear Issue & Iran President Says 'Won't Back Down'

TYLER DURDEN


Summary

  • Al Arabiya issues dramatic retraction on prior 'deal reached' reporting.
  • Iranian president vows to not back down, as Trump still vows to get nuclear material.
  • AI Arabiya TV obtains what it describes as final draft of US-lran agreement, 
  • Reuters reported that Ayatollah ordered that stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% remain strictly inside Iranian territory. Some Iranian officials then denied report to Al Jazeera.
  • WH says make a deal or else... "they can face a punishment from our military the likes of which has not been seen in modern history."
  • US Intelligence says Iran has reconstitute drone program, defense industrial base, "faster than expected" (CNN).

After something like eight hours - which unleashed significant moves in oil and markets - complete retractions are being issued, with words like 'fabrication' used, after which oil swings higher...

Iranian President: Won't Back Down

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has stated, "We will not bow our heads, our ministers and experts are working day and night, without a single day off." He added, per state sources: "We are willing to sacrifice as much as possible for the honor and pride of Iran, and we are not afraid of martyrdom."

And just like that...

Markets reversed earlier gains as Iran's President said on state TV that they won't back down in talks. The momentum then picked up when a "high-level source" told Al-Arabiya that the Pakistani Army Chief will not head to Tehran tonight.

The Pakistani were supposed to head to Iran only when the reach of an agreement was in sight, so this kind of denies the earlier reports of a US and Iran draft agreement.

US stock indices erased more than half of earlier gains. We've seen the same reaction in oil, FX and bond markets but now they are consolidating.

Still, Al Jazeera is reporting that "negotiators are very close to reaching a deal, and are currently working on a draft text. At the same time, another source told Al Jazeera that it is too early to judge whether a serious, final agreement is within reach."

IRNA has cited a Pakistani official who says the talks are "moving in the right direct" - though it's anyone's guess at this point. The prior reported draft did not take up the nuclear issue. Trump continues to press the nuclear issue:


US President Donald Trump has again pledged to seize Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium as part of any agreement over Tehran’s nuclear program.

“Look, we’re going to make sure they don’t have a nuclear weapon or we’re going to have to do something very drastic. I believe when it’s put to the people of our country, they will all agree we cannot let Iran get a nuclear weapon,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

Asked whether Iran could retain its enriched uranium, Trump replied: “No, we will get it. We don’t need it, we don’t want it, we’ll probably destroy it after we get it. But we’re not going to let them have it.”








Antisemitism in Germany ‘worse than any time since the Holocaust,’ annual figures show


Antisemitism in Germany ‘worse than any time since the Holocaust,’ annual figures show


Germany continues to face persistently high levels of antisemitism, with 2,197 anti-Jewish incidents recorded in Berlin in 2025, according to a reportpublished Wednesday by Germany’s Federal Association of Departments for Research and Information on Antisemitism, known as RIAS.

The figure was down about 13 percent from 2,521 incidents the previous year, but remained more than double pre-October 7, 2023, levels.

In the state of Hesse, RIAS noted a record 1,099 antisemitic incidents in 2025, an 18% increase from the previous year and nearly six times higher than before Hamas launched its war against Israel in late 2023.

“The threat to Jewish life is worse than at any time since the Holocaust,” Hesse antisemitism commissioner Uwe Becker said in a statement following the report.

RIAS highlighted 40 violent incidents in Berlin during the year, including a stabbing attack in February at the Holocaust Memorial in which a young man was wounded in the neck.

That attacker, who carried a written oath of allegiance to the Islamic State terrorist group and shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the assault, was later convicted of attempted murder and attempted membership in a foreign terrorist organization, and sentenced to 13 years in prison, the report noted. The man narrowly survived the life-threatening injury after fighting back, fleeing to the edge of the monument, and undergoing emergency surgery.

Other cases involved assaults, victims being punched in the face, spat on, sprayed with chemical irritants, or having religious garments and jewelry violently torn from their bodies.

The report describes an increasingly hostile environment in which Jews and Israelis face harassment, intimidation and violence in public spaces.

RIAS Berlin recorded antisemitic occurrences at 239 public assemblies and rallies in 2025, the highest number ever recorded. The protests frequently featured antisemitic chants, banners equating Zionism or Israel with Nazism, and anti-Jewish slurs woven into public speeches.

Activism categorized as “anti-Israel” accounted for the largest identifiable share of politically motivated incidents, driving 303 cases overall and 179 of the antisemitic rallies. The far-right/right-wing populist spectrum was linked to 123 incidents, primarily taking the form of swastika graffiti and illegal propaganda stickers plastered across outward-lying residential districts.

“These are not isolated events,” the report said. “They point to a societal climate in which antisemitic statements and actions are possible—and too often go unchallenged.”