Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Extreme Persecution In Nigeria Escalating


Nigeria: It Is Time For The US Government And The Media To Answer Their Cries

The conditions in northern Nigeria have deteriorated significantly over the past six months. Attacks have increased dramatically — it feels as though massacres have become a daily occurrence. I recently spoke at a burial for eight people who were killed in a single night. The very next day, another 30 people were murdered in a separate attack. A few days later, 20 more lost their lives. It has become almost impossible to keep up with the scale and frequency of the violence.

Boko Haram and other terrorist groups have grown bolder in both their rhetoric and their actions. A few weeks ago, Boko Haram released a video declaring their intent to drive Christians out of the northern region by force. Another video warned that all Christians must “convert to Islam or be killed.” Attacks by radicalized Fulani groups have also escalated, leaving Christian communities paralyzed by fear.

Almost 150 Christians were slaughtered during Holy Week — 34 on Easter Sunday alone — making it one of the deadliest Holy Weeks on record here in Northern Nigeria. This has precipitated the need for a new and important ministry for us at Across Nigeria as we are now serving over 547 widows whose husbands were killed in recent attacks — and the numbers and need are growing rapidly.

We have worked in northern Nigeria for more than a decade, and I have never seen conditions this severe.

One thing that has become increasingly clear to me is that the situation is not improving. In fact, it has grown significantly worse. With now more than 70,000 killed since 2009, it’s time to put an end to the genocide of Christians in northern Nigeria.

The genocide taking place here has been ignored for well over a decade. That’s why, when President Trump spoke out about it, I was encouraged. He was the first president to speak out on the issue, which had been largely overlooked by both the Obama and Biden administrations. Not only did the president speak up about the issue, he put his words into action.

On Christmas Day, President Trump ordered airstrikes in the northwest to target a new and rapidly growing terrorist group known as Lakurawa. Finally, there was a president willing to intervene. I was not the only one encouraged — much of the Christian community in northern Nigeria felt the same way. For the first time, many believed their cries were being heard and that the United States was standing with them.

As encouraged as I was, concern weighed heavy in the back of my mind. I hoped this would not be another case of the U.S. launching airstrikes, then ultimately abandoning the situation. Unfortunately, there is a history of this pattern. We saw it in Libya in 2011 and again in Afghanistan in 2021, to name a few recent examples. My concern with the Christmas Day strikes was — and has always been — that the U.S. would strike and then withdraw, leaving an inevitable vacuum that would make the situation even worse.

Apart from a small company of U.S. troops working counter-terrorism and utilizing some drones, that is exactly what has happened.

Now, the consequences of these actions are becoming a grim reality. The initial action, followed by a lack of sustained engagement, has had a devastating effect. Instead of backing down, radicalized terrorist groups have been emboldened and have intensified their attacks.

We have also seen a shift in the posture of the Nigerian Army and security forces. With the United States appearing disengaged, there is a growing perception that Nigerian Army forces are choosing sides. Whether by order — implicit or explicit — or the need for survival, one speculates, but cannot clearly tell.

One consistent account I hear when visiting communities that have suffered attacks is that security forces almost always arrive only after the violence has already occurred. A Boko Haram informant recently told me that they drive back and forth in front of security forces and Army outposts without ever being stopped or hindered. He said the only time security forces respond to their presence is when they are directly engaged. Otherwise, in his words, “We have free rein.”

I’m not a warmonger. In fact, I have strong isolationist leanings. But after watching an increasing cycle of violence over the past decade, it’s clear that something has to be done.



Will Trump's China Visit Determine The Fate Of The War?


Trump's China visit will determine the fate of the war


The US president's visit to China has become the central axis on which the continuation of the war with Iran depends, as a power that proved in the past that it can influence Iran and set limits for it is a key player. After being harmed by the blockade of Hormuz and helping the Iranians with intelligence, China could advance the US terms in negotiations in exchange for demands of its own on Taiwan.

In Israel and the Gulf states, officials believe that the Americans will not resume strikes on Iran at least until after President Donald Trump's meeting with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping.

According to two diplomatic sources, the Americans have made clear to their allies in the region that the high level of military readiness is ungoing, the US Navy is maintaining its blockade on Iranian ships, and the accumulation of additional equipment, including interceptors, is also continuing. But, Trump is giving the diplomatic channel a chance.

"The president will not come to China against the backdrop of a war, since he wants to enlist the Chinese president in moves that will bring the war to an end through a deal," one of the sources told Israel Hayom.

According to the source, the Chinese are the most significant international actor capable of pressuring the Revolutionary Guards, and they are also the ones that have been badly harmed by the blockade of Hormuz. On the other hand, he added, they will not help Trump for free, and will try as much as possible to prevent an agreement that would lead to US involvement in Iran's oil sector. The compensation they demand may be connected to Taiwan.

In Israel Hayom, we reported that China had already intervened about a month ago by exerting pressure on the regime in an effort to bring about, at the very least, a ceasefire. That pressure, together with the military blows, did indeed lead to a halt in military actions, even though Iran withdrew from its agreement to open Hormuz unconditionally. 

Beijing warned Tehran at the time that if the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz continued, it would turn to alternative oil sources and consider suspending the strategic cooperation agreement between the two countries.

Israel Hayom has learned that, at the request of the Arab Gulf states, the Chinese demanded that Iran refrain from bombing them. Iran complied only partially, and in the latest flare-up over the weekend it attacked the United Arab Emirates, but did not expand the strikes to Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf states.

On the other hand, according to the Americans, China assisted Iran with intelligence information. As a result, the US Treasury Department announced that it was imposing sanctions on three Chinese companies accused of helping Iran's military carry out attacks on US forces during the war. According to the report from the US State Department, the Chinese companies provided satellite images that enabled Iranian military attacks against US forces in the region. The reference is apparently to attacks on US bases in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar.


At the same time, against the backdrop of energy distress caused by the blockade of Hormuz, the European Union is beginning to show signs of involvement, even if only minimal. European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the EU would expand its sanctions against Iran to include those responsible for disrupting freedom of navigation. She accused Iran of responsibility for the escalation in the strait, but clarified that the EU sought to help renew negotiations with Iran in order to end the conflict.

Kallas also said that EU foreign ministers had agreed to strengthen cooperation with the countries on the shores of the Persian Gulf after the Iran war and to accelerate work on strategic partnership agreements with all six countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council.





Data center caught using 30 million gallons of ‘unbilled’ water as Georgia residents’ taps drizzle


Data center caught using 30 million gallons of ‘unbilled’ water as Georgia residents’ taps drizzle


Georgia residents were left outraged when they discovered a massive data center had been guzzling up nearly 30 million gallons of water without paying for it.

The issue began last year when residents in the affluent subdivision of Annelise Park in Fayetteville noticed their water pressure was unusually low, Politico reports.

When the county utility then investigated the problem, officials discovered that developer Quality Technology Services (QTS) had installed two industrial-scale water hookups to the approximately 6.2 million square foot data center campus – located about 20 miles south of downtown Atlanta.

One of the water connections appeared to have been installed without anyone at the water utility knowing, while the other was not linked to the company’s account – and it therefore was not being billed.

By May 15, 2025, the Fayette County Water System sent a letter to QTS, saying it owed nearly $150,000 for using more than 29 million gallons of water – the equivalent of 44 Olympic-size swimming pools, far exceeding the limit agreed to during the planning process.

QTS, which is owned by private equity firm Blackstone, eventually paid off the $147,474 debt and was not charged any extra fines.

But the company’s massive water usage only came to light last week when resident James Clifton obtained the 2025 letter to QTS from a public records request, and posted it to Facebook.

Meanwhile, the entire state of Georgia is experiencing moderate to high levels of drought. Governor Brian Kemp has even declared a state of emergency in response to one of the state’sworst wildfire outbreaks in years.

Developer Quality Technology Services installed two industrial-scale water hookups without officials at the Fayette County water authority’s knowledge.

In May 2025, the Fayette County Water System sent a letter to QTS, saying it owed nearly $150,000 for using more than 29 million gallons of water at its data center (pictured) – the equivalent of 44 Olympic-size swimming pools

When residents were then told to scale back their own water usage, their frustrations with the data center reached a boiling point.

‘We get this notification from Fayette County water system saying you need to stop watering your lawns to help conserve water,’ said Clifton, a local attorney who is now running for county office.

‘So the first thing they do is lean on the individuals and the citizens to stop water consumption, when we have QTS that’s just absolutely draining us – most months it’s the number one consumer of water in the county.

‘It’s just frustrating to see them come into our community and run all over us, like the citizens don’t matter, and then they’re above the law when they do break it,’ Clifton added as he railed against the fact that the water utility did not penalize or fine the data center.

He also shared on Facebook on Sunday that the data center – one of the largest in the country – has been watering its landscape ‘nearly continuously’ for four days.





The Saudi 'No' Puts Abraham Accords Into Deep Freeze


The Saudi 'No' Puts Abraham Accords Into Deep Freeze
PIERRE REHOV/



Riyadh has chosen its words with care, yet the meaning could hardly be more clear. Saudi Arabia will not recognize the State of Israel -- not under the present Israeli government and -- here comes the poison pill -- not before the creation of an independent Palestinian state along the 1949 "Auschwitz" armistice lines, with East Jerusalem as its capital.

The Saudi foreign minister has framed this stance as a strategic principle rather than a negotiating position. A 2025 survey conducted by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy revealed that 99% of Saudi citizens view normalization with Israel as a negative development. The Abraham Accords, once touted as a breakthrough, have quietly moved, in Saudi political conversation, into the deep freeze.

Once US President Donald J. Trump, without Saudi Arabia lifting a finger, relieved the kingdom of its foremost adversary, Iran, and removed the major threat to the kingdom, what would Saudi Arabia need Israel for anyway? To the Saudis, the Abraham Accords doubtless look like an agreement signed by others, but never embraced by the one Arab power that truly mattered.

Only the packaging has changed. After the UN adopted the 1947 partition plan, the Arab League and the Arab states rejected it and opposed any form of Jewish sovereignty on any part of the land, and chose war instead of the two-state solution on offer from the international community.

In September 1967, the Arab League, at its summit in Khartoum, delivered the famous three "no's": no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel. Notably, the declaration made no mention of a Palestinian state, which the late senior PLO official Zuheir Mohsen significantly pointed out in 1977, had not yet been invented:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality, today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

Today's Saudi position, cloaked in the vocabulary of international law and Palestinian self-determination, serves the same purpose: to make any recognition of Israel conditional on terms Riyadh knows Jerusalem cannot accept. Where Khartoum was blunt and openly hostile, the contemporary version is polished, presentable and "politically correct" in Western foreign ministries -- and therefore more potent.

The kingdom no longer conceals its antisemitic undertones that accompany this repositioning. In January 2026, the Anti-Defamation League took the unusual step of issuing a public statement highlighting its alarm over the sharp rise in antisemitic rhetoric in Saudi Arabia and the growing public attacks on the Abraham Accords by prominent Saudi figures. Two weeks later, the front page of the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah labeled the United Arab Emirates a "Zionist Trojan horse" in the Arab world. Such commentary appears in outlets operating under close royal supervision, signaling what the leadership wishes to be heard.




Fear As A Weapon


Fear And Psychological Bioterrorism


Fear is one of the most powerful drugs ever invented.


Unlike antibiotics or antivirals, it requires no FDA approval, no manufacturing plant, and no cold-chain shipping. Fear spreads itself. All it takes is a headline, a few experts on television, ominous music behind a news segment, and suddenly millions of people begin scanning their bodies for symptoms they did not know they had ten minutes earlier.


Psychological Bioterrorism is the weaponization of fear about disease in order to manipulate individuals, populations, markets, and governments. Sometimes the objective is political. Sometimes financial. Sometimes bureaucratic. Often, it is all three at once.


This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a recognized form of psychological warfare. We have written about it extensively in our book Psywar.


In that book, we write about Dr. Alexander Kouzminov, a former Soviet-Russian intelligence officer with deep experience in biological espionage and biosecurity operations, who in 2017, described how fear of infectious disease can be strategically amplified to shape public behavior, influence governments, and create opportunities for those positioned to benefit from the panic. That process is called psychological bioterrorism.


Once you understand the framework, you start seeing the pattern everywhere.


The media shifts into apocalyptic mode. Experts appear to be predicting catastrophe. Computer models project millions dead, if the right circumstances coalesce. Politicians declare emergencies. Pharmaceutical companies announce new products. Social media turns into a digital panic attack. And ordinary people, who just wanted to buy eggs and walk the dog, suddenly feel like civilization is one cough away from collapse.


But if you watched the recent media cycle unfold, you would think half the country was moments away from dying in a cloud of mouse droppings drifting through the HVAC system at Tractor Supply.


The reality is far less cinematic.


This is how psychological bioterrorism works. The pathogen itself matters less than the emotional payload attached to it.


Fear scales faster than facts.


The reason these campaigns work so well is simple. Human beings are biologically wired to fear invisible threats. A wolf outside the cave is frightening. But an invisible virus floating through the air? That activates something much deeper in the human nervous system. You cannot see it. You cannot smell it. You cannot negotiate with it. Every stranger becomes a potential threat. Every cough becomes suspicious.


That loss of control is the point.


More....



Monday, May 11, 2026

Pentagon reveals location of secret Navy submarine capable of launching nukes after Trump rejects Iran peace offer


Pentagon reveals location of secret Navy submarine capable of launching nukes after Trump rejects Iran peace offer


The Pentagon revealed the location Monday of one of the US Navy’s most secretive vessels – a stealthy, nuclear-armed submarine – a day after President Trump rejected Iran’s latest peace offer

The Navy’s Sixth Fleet shared an image of the Ohio-class submarine and its crew docked Sunday in Gibraltar, a British territory off Spain’s southern coast.  

“The port visit demonstrates US capability, flexibility, and continuing commitment to its NATO allies,” the Sixth Fleet said in a press release. 

“Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines are undetectable launch platforms for submarine-launched ballistic missiles, providing the US with its most survivable leg of the nuclear triad,” the fleet added. 

The Navy, which operates 14 nuclear-powered and nuclear-armed Ohio-class submarines, did not share the name of the vessel docked in Gibraltar. 

The submarine’s Trident II ballistic missiles have a range of over 4,500 miles. 

The Pentagon rarely discloses the locations of its nuclear subs, which is considered highly classified information.  

The disclosure came hours after Trump slammed Iran’s latest peace offer as “totally unacceptable.”

“I have just read the response from Iran’s so-called ‘Representatives.’ I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!” the president wrote on Truth Social Sunday. 

Trump further accused the Islamic Republic of “playing games” with the United States and the rest of the world. 

The Iranian regime has refused to accept terms that would require it to abandon its nuclear program and turn over enriched uranium to the US. 

The president has repeatedly warned that he will restart military operations against the regime if a peace deal is not agreed to soon. 


UAE Becomes Active Combatant in Iran War, Secretly Launching Strikes Against Islamic Regime


UAE Becomes Active Combatant in Iran War, Secretly Launching Strikes Against Islamic Regime


The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been secretly carrying out attacks against Iran, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The attacks included a strike on an oil refinery on Iran’s Lavan Island in early April, triggering a major fire and knocking much of the facility offline for months.

Iran acknowledged at the time that the refinery had been struck in what it described as an enemy attack.

Tehran later responded with missile and drone strikes against the UAE and Kuwait.

While Gulf states publicly insisted before the war that they would not allow their territory or airspace to be used for attacks on Iran, the UAE became an active participant in the conflict after coming under sustained Iranian attack.

Iran launched more than 2,800 missiles and drones at the UAE during the war, more than against any other country besides Israel.

The attacks disrupted tourism, aviation, and property markets across the Emirates and reportedly triggered a major shift in Abu Dhabi’s strategic outlook toward Tehran.

U.S. officials are said to have quietly welcomed the UAE’s participation in the war effort, according to the report.

The UAE has not publicly acknowledged carrying out strikes inside Iran. However, its foreign ministry pointed to previous statements asserting the country’s right to respond militarily to hostile acts.

Open-source researchers and analysts have increasingly linked UAE military assets to operations inside Iran.

The UAE possesses one of the most advanced air forces in the Middle East, including fleets of F-16s, Mirage fighters, surveillance aircraft, refueling planes, and armed drones.

However, the country remains at serious risk of economic catastrophe as a result of the conflict given its dependency on the Strait of Hormuz for importing goods and exporting its vast oil reserves.


Turkey Now Has Israel In Its Crosshairs: New Missile Can Reach Tel Aviv


Turkey Now Has Israel In Its Crosshairs: New Missile Can Reach Tel Aviv
 PNW STAFF



For decades, modern Turkey was viewed by Israel and the West as one of the few stable Muslim-majority nations that could bridge East and West. It was a NATO ally, a strategic military partner, and at times even a quiet friend to Jerusalem. But today, under the leadership of Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan, Turkey has transformed into something far more dangerous — an increasingly militant regional power openly hostile toward Israel and deeply driven by neo-Ottoman ambitions.

What once seemed unthinkable is now openly discussed in Turkish political and religious circles: the idea of leading the Islamic world against Jerusalem.

That is no longer rhetoric confined to obscure extremists. ErdoÄŸan himself has repeatedly escalated anti-Israel language, accusing Israel of genocide, comparing Israeli leaders to dictators, and positioning Turkey as the defender of the Muslim world against the Jewish state. At the same time, Ankara has deepened ties with Islamist movements, provided shelter to Hamas leadership, and supported factions in Syria tied to radical Islamist ideologies.

Now a new development is raising alarms far beyond the Middle East.


Turkey’s unveiling of the Yildirimhan (“Thunderhammer”) missile represents more than another military achievement. With reported speeds approaching Mach 25 and a range of roughly 6,000 kilometers, the missile symbolizes Turkey’s arrival as a strategic power capable of threatening not only regional rivals, but entire continents. Most significantly for Israel, Tel Aviv now sits directly within range of an advanced Turkish missile system.

The implications are enormous.

For years, Israel’s greatest conventional threats were believed to come from Iran and its proxy network — Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and militias scattered throughout Syria and Iraq. That has all changed dramaically in the past few months and while Iran still has some capabilities, it is nothing like it once was.  But Turkey represents a very different kind of challenge. Unlike Iran, Turkey is a NATO member with one of the largest militaries in the world, a massive industrial base, growing defense manufacturing capabilities, and increasing influence across the Sunni Muslim world.

Iran operates through proxies and shadow warfare. Turkey increasingly projects organized state power.

This is what makes the current moment so historically significant. Turkey is no longer merely criticizing Israel diplomatically. It is building the military, ideological, and geopolitical framework necessary to become a direct regional challenger to Jerusalem itself.

The shift has happened gradually enough that much of the West still struggles to recognize it. ErdoÄŸan has spent years cultivating what many analysts describe as a neo-Ottoman vision — reviving Turkish influence across lands once ruled by the Ottoman Empire. That includes Syria, Iraq, Libya, the eastern Mediterranean, and critically, Jerusalem.

The Ottoman Empire controlled Jerusalem for nearly 400 years before its collapse after World War I. For some within Turkey’s Islamist political movement, that loss still carries deep historical and spiritual significance. ErdoÄŸan has repeatedly invoked Ottoman imagery and legacy in speeches, portraying Turkey not merely as a nation-state, but as the rightful guardian of Islamic civilization.

This is where geopolitics begins intersecting with Bible prophecy in ways many Christians are increasingly watching closely.

The Bible repeatedly warns that Jerusalem would become the focal point of international conflict in the last days. The prophet Book of Zechariah declared that Jerusalem would become “a burdensome stone for all people,” while nations would gather against it. The prophet Book of Ezekiel described a future coalition of nations rising against Israel from the north.

For years, many prophecy teachers focused primarily on Russia and Iran when discussing these passages. But Turkey’s increasingly aggressive posture is causing some to relook at those passages. Many of the ancient regions mentioned in Ezekiel’s prophecies are often associated by scholars with areas located in modern-day Turkey.

Turkey is moving away from secular nationalism and toward religious nationalism. Away from cooperation with Israel and toward confrontation. Away from Western moderation and toward Islamist populism.

And unlike many of Israel’s enemies, Turkey possesses the infrastructure, economy, military sophistication, and geographic position to become a truly transformational regional force.

That reality should concern not only Christians watching prophecy, but policymakers watching geopolitics.

Because history repeatedly shows that civilizations often fail to recognize major threats until they fully emerge. The world once assumed Russia would permanently integrate into the Western order after the Cold War. It assumed China’s economic rise would liberalize its politics. It assumed the Middle East was becoming less ideological and more pragmatic.

Now another assumption may be collapsing: that Turkey would remain permanently anchored to the West.

Instead, the nation that once stood as a bridge between civilizations increasingly appears to be choosing a side.

And Jerusalem remains at the center of it all.



Kings Of The East On The Horizon? The Euphrates River Is Drying Up


Kings Of The East On The Horizon? The Euphrates River Is Drying Up
PNW STAFF



The slow but measurable decline of the Euphrates River has begun to capture attention far beyond environmental and geopolitical circles. Once a lifeline of ancient civilizations and a defining boundary of empires, the river is now increasingly viewed through a more symbolic lens—especially among those who study biblical prophecy. For some observers, the shrinking waters are not just an ecological warning sign, but a potential alignment with ancient predictions found in the Book of Revelation.

Satellite data suggests the basin has already lost more than 34 cubic miles of freshwater since the early 2000s—an astonishing volume equivalent to roughly 13 million Olympic-sized swimming pools. The causes are well documented: prolonged drought, rising temperatures, heavy damming upstream, and increasing water demands from multiple nations that rely on the river for survival.

And yet, for those who view current events through a prophetic framework, the data carries an additional layer of meaning.


In the Book of Revelation, chapter 16 describes a striking moment: “The sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great river Euphrates, and its water was dried up to prepare the way for the kings from the East.” In ancient context, the Euphrates was more than a river—it was a geopolitical boundary, a natural defense line that separated the ancient Near East from eastern powers. The imagery of it drying up symbolized the removal of a barrier, allowing massive movements of forces toward a final conflict often associated with Armageddon.

For modern readers who take biblical prophecy seriously, the imagery is difficult to ignore. The idea that a literal drying of the Euphrates could one day allow military or political powers from the East to move freely into the region has become a recurring point of discussion in prophecy circles. The phrase “kings of the East” is often interpreted broadly to represent coalitions of nations or regional powers that may one day play a decisive role in end-times events.  

China is often considered a leading candidate for representing the Kings of The East as it is one of the few armies in the world that could muster an army of 200 million that Revelation talks about.  However it could also be a coalition of nations, we cannot say with absolute certainty except that they come from the East of Jerusalem.

What makes the Euphrates particularly significant is its historical and strategic weight. Flowing through the region historically known as Mesopotamia—the “cradle of civilization”—the river has sustained empires, agriculture, trade routes, and population centers for thousands of years. Its importance is not symbolic alone; it is deeply practical. Any significant reduction in its flow reshapes agriculture, energy production, and political stability across multiple nations.

Today, that stability is already under pressure. Competing dam projects in Turkey, Syria, and Iraq have altered downstream flow. Extended droughts across the Middle East have reduced snowpack and rainfall feeding the river. In some stretches, once-wide channels have narrowed into shallow, fragmented streams. Entire agricultural zones are struggling to survive.

For those studying prophecy, this is where observation and interpretation begin to overlap. Is the world witnessing the early stages of a long environmental decline that happens to resemble ancient language? Or is it possible that human systems are unknowingly moving toward conditions described thousands of years ago?

What is clear is that the Euphrates is no longer a static backdrop of ancient history. It is a living, changing system under stress. Whether one interprets that through the lens of climate science, geopolitics, or biblical prophecy, the implications are profound.

If current trends continue, the question may not simply be whether the Euphrates will continue to decline, but what its decline will mean for the balance of power in the Middle East. And for those who study end-times prophecy, the deeper question remains: are these developments a slow unfolding of natural history—or early indicators of a far more dramatic chapter yet to come?






What is a Hantavirus?


What is a Hantavirus?


Hantaviruses are a large class of enveloped, single-stranded RNA viruses. Today, scientists recognise more than 50 hantavirus species worldwide, with approximately two dozen known to infect humans. Most infections occur through inhalation of aerosolised rodent urine, faeces or saliva (how unclean was that cruise ship?). Human-to-human spread is considered very rare, although the Andes virus in South America has shown limited evidence of person-to-person transmission. For the last 50 years, rodents have been the primary hosts of hantaviruses. However, recent discoveries have shown that hantaviruses also infect bats, moles and shrews.

Before the 1993 outbreak in the Four Corners region of the Southwest (where Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah meet)only 31 hantavirus cases had ever been reported. The initial outbreak affected 24 previously healthy young adults who suddenly developed fever, muscle aches and rapidly progressive respiratory failure, and within days, there were a few deaths. US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) investigators eventually identified a previously unknown hantavirus carried by the deer mouse. It was later named Sin Nombre virus. The deaths resulted from what became known as Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (“HPS”). (Do you remember hysterically hearing about this from the CDC or local public health departments? I don’t either …)

After the 1993 outbreak, the CDC began national surveillance for hantavirus infections. As of the end of 2023 (30 years), 890 confirmed hantavirus disease cases had been reported nationwide, as HPS or non-pulmonary hantavirus infections. (A non-pulmonary case is one in which patients tested positive for hantavirus infection but never developed the classic pulmonary phase. Of these, 309 cases were classified as HPS with a case-fatality rate of approximately 35%, which is about 10 deaths per year.

Historical surveillance has shown that approximately 96 per cent of US cases occurred west of the Mississippi River, reflecting the geographic range of the deer mouse and related rodent reservoirs. However, at least one case has been identified in nearly every state.

The CDC reports that hantaviruses are spread through exposure to infected rodent urine, droppings or saliva, especially when contaminated materials become aerosolised and inhaled. As previously stated, deer mice are considered the principal reservoir for Sin Nombre virus in North America. Hantaviruses found in the United States are not believed to spread from person to person.

Long-term CDC surveillance has demonstrated that hantavirus activity fluctuates with environmental conditions that influence rodent populations. Researchers studying deer mouse ecology in the Southwest have observed that fluctuations in infected rodent populations are closely linked to environmental conditions.


Watching the headlines unfold this week feels like watching a rerun of a movie we’ve seen multiple times before:

  • A virus outbreak on a cruise ship.
  • Emergency evacuations. Hospital escorts.
  • Contact tracing across multiple countries.
  • Media outlets flood the public with alarming updates before most people even know what hantavirus is.

The images, the language and the emotional conditioning are familiar because we have seen this exact pattern before. It always begins the same way: create fear first, provide context later, and by the time the facts catch up, the public has already been pushed into a state of panic and vaccinated. It seems every 2 years we get a new viral scare from the media, as the very expensive and intrusive Biosecurity Agenda gets built out. Remember this?:

The pre-summer hysteria is a readily recognised, predictable formula. Will we watch an entire global population stop, question and challenge this current “emergency,” or will people put on masks and socially distance because they were pre-conditioned to do so?

Before the public even has time to understand what the concern is about, we learn that there are 13 documented hantavirus vaccine and gene therapy programmes in active development:

  • 6 DNA “vaccines” (US Army / USAMRIID) – many of them “needle-free” jet-injector versions – this is a DNA gene-therapy.
  • 3 mRNA “vaccines” (Moderna + Korea University, Chinese research team, VIDO Canada)
  • 2 viral vector “vaccines” (UK institutions + VIDO Canada)
  • 1 inactivated vaccine (Hantavax – already licensed and used in South Korea)
  • 1 protein subunit vaccine (VIDO Canada)

We no longer live in a world where a small outbreak is simply a local event. Today, a few infections can mobilise an entire international system of control overnight. Quarantines. Travel restrictions. Surveillance. Emergency authorisations. Expanded government power. We saw it happen in 2020; many people complied because they believed it was temporary, necessary and for the greater good. But temporary powers have a way of becoming permanent infrastructure, and once those systems are in place, they do not disappear when the headlines fade.

More...