Sunday, July 22, 2012

Tyranny And Gun Control: UN Gun Treaty Threatens Freedom

UN Gun Treaty Threatens Peace And Safety

While everyone is distracted by Justice Roberts' antics in the Supreme Court ruling over Obamacare, the Supreme Courts' ruling over Arizona's immigration law, the presidential campaign, and a myriad of other political happenings, the international leftists are working to destroy civilization as we know it with a draconian gun treaty that will chew up and spit out the 2nd Amendment

The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty is evidence enough of the liberal left's attempt to take away our right to bear arms.

Obama has indicated a number of times he is a big gun control guy, but like the rest of the democrats, he wants to do it without being very open about it. He has realized he can't do it through American laws, so he is figuring the best way to circumvent the Constitution regarding gun rights is through international intrusion.

Article VI of the U.S. Constitution is clear. Treaties are the Supreme Law of the Land just like the Constitution, and any laws made in pursuance of the Constitution. That means that a properly ratified treaty can indeed supersede the Constitution.

The problem for the democrats is that there are enough pro-gun democrats that even with a lame duck Congress at the end of the year they may not be able to get the Senate to ratify a gun control treaty. . . therefore, I think they will deem it valid, and bypass the Senate completely.

The gun control democrats have been working on this for a while. Fast and Furious was their final attempt to do this without calling on international control over guns, but now that they have decided to work openly with the international leftists, it turns out the plans of the American liberal left mirrors that of the United Nations left - and the plan is nothing new.

The Obama administration is currently negotiating the final details of the new global agreement through the United Nations, claiming the arms trade treaty and the small arms treaty are necessary to fight terrorism, insurgency, and international crime syndicates. They believe taking guns out of the hands of people will eliminate gun violence, when in reality crazies always find a way to get their hands on firearms, and crazies also love their victims unarmed. Statistics at Gun Facts shows that whenever a government tightens their grip on gun control laws, or eliminates the right to bear arms, violent crime goes up.

The beginnings of this global treaty, however, may not be something recent, but a blast from the past, or more specifically, from back in the sixties. This U.N. treaty reads like a 1961 State Department memorandum. The memorandum in 1961 explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.

The memorandum doesn't stop with the plan to disarm citizens. It also calls for the elimination of national borders, destroying national sovereignty, and creating a world army to replace national armies to enforce the global dictates of the United Nations.

Does that one world government conspiracy theory still sound like a theory?

The small arms treaty and arms trade treaty, combined with the Rights of the Child treaty, Law of the Sea Treaty, Agenda 21, and a number of other insidious treaties, along with a number of past treaties we have already been willing to bow to, strip the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws.

The U.N. Gun Treaty, if not stopped, will ultimately result in the destruction of the 2nd Amendment, and our right to keep and bear arms. With as many gun owners there are in this country, the ultimate result will not be the silent compliance by the American populace the leftists are expecting. Stopping this treaty, then, is also an attempt to stop the occurrence of blood in the streets.

What is the ultimate purpose of gun control?

This video puts things in perspective and is well worth a 4 minute investment:

Over the years, I’ve had conversations with Europeans about gun control. Not surprisingly, they have been very critical of America’s “gun culture” — that is, the widespread ownership of guns among the American people. They have extolled the situation in Europe, where gun-control laws preclude people from freely owning guns, arguing that such laws make for a more peaceful society.

My response to such Europeans has included the following: The big advantage we have over you is what happens if a tyrannical regime ever takes power. Except for Switzerland, where most families are well-armed with assault rifles and handguns, Europeans have but one choice when faced with the rise of a tyrannical regime: submit and obey or be killed. Americans, at least, have one final choice — resist with guns.

Let’s assume, for example, that a regime assumes power in a European country that will not permit elections, abolishes civil liberties, takes command and control over the economy, and begins rounding up and incarcerating, torturing, raping, and killing dissidents and critics without a trial. Given that the troops who are enforcing the regime’s orders will be the only ones in society who have guns, the citizenry will inevitably shut their mouths or, even worse, become ardent and enthusiastic supporters of the regime.

A good example, of course, was Nazi Germany, where German Jews lacked the means to resist their round-ups and incarceration with force and where ordinary Germans, also lacking the means to resist what was going on, kept silent or became government supporters.

And that’s where the right to keep and bear arms comes into play. It’s the insurance policy that Americans have in the unlikely event that would-be American tyrants were ever to assume power in our country, prohibiting elections, rounding up dissidents and critics, torturing and raping them, and executing them without due process of law.

In fact, the right to keep and bears arms actually serves as more than an insurance policy, it also serves as a deterrent. For when would-be tyrants know that the citizenry is well-armed, they think twice about imposing tyranny

Looking at history is often an antidote for wishful thinking, and Benedict LaRosa’s splendid “Gun Control: A Historical Perspective” provides a potent tonic. Gun control (or, going back far into history as LaRosa does, weapons control) has been a favored policy of rulers who want a meek, compliant populace under their control. He includes an examination of Switzerland, where gun ownership is nearly universal. “The Swiss do not have an army—they are the army,” one official Swiss publication proudly says. Despite the fact that Switzerland bristles with privately owned firearms of all kinds, gun-related violence is far lower there than in most nations with draconian gun laws.

There is a war on our freedoms and this includes the right to bear arms. Over the years there has been a mass indoctrination to the evils of guns, which has resulted in the systematic psychological disarmament of the American people. With less armed law-abiding citizens and more gun-free zones, the result has been more helpless victims. It has also demonstrated that we cannot rely on government to protect us from criminals. Most crime we are facing will not be solved by further gun control legislation. Furthermore tyrants like Stalin, Hitler, and Mao all sought to disarm their own citizens in order to control them and ensure their own power. Many genocide victims were deprived of the necessary means to adequately defend themselves.

There are calls for stricter gun control laws after almost every mass shooting. Taking firearms out of the hands of law-abiding citizens won't prevent such tragedies; it makes us less safe. Gun control laws do little to prevent criminals from acquiring guns, and they simply ignore any gun-free zones which in turn makes them victim disbarment zones. In many cases it was a gun that prevented a situation from further escalating. We can't rely on the police to save us as they usually show up after a crime has been perpetrated. It is our responsibility to protect ourselves and our families. Criminals fear an armed citizenry, and it is not surprising that crime tends to rise in an environment where people have lost their ability to properly defend themselves.

Only an armed civilian population can properly defend themselves and resist a tyrannical government. When the Nazis seized power in Germany in 1933, they immediately began massive search and seizures of firearms to further neutralize their political opponents. The Gestapo later established a system of central registration of persons obtaining firearms. Hitler's gun control and disarming of the population almost completely guaranteed that firearms were in the possession of Nazi supporters and sympathizers and made any kind of armed resistance inside Germany next to impossible. Hitler said, “The most foolish mistake we would possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquers who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing.” The Second Amendment protects the gun rights of individuals and is about preventing tyranny. Gun control and the disarming of the population threatens a nation's very survival. It should come as no surprise that the United Nations, which is essentially the mechanism for world government, wishes to gut the Second Amendment and institute a global gun ban that would include the private ownership of firearms.

Purdue student and Young America's Foundation Intern Scholar Hillary Cherry provides her thoughts on the Colorado shooting, stressing the importance of protecting our Second Amendment rights:

A masked gunman opened fire yesterday on one of the 3,700 midnight showings of The Dark Knight Rises, leaving 12 dead, 50 injured, and one in custody. Liberals everywhere are wasting no time to use this massacre in an effort to push gun control and gut the Second Amendment.

Mayor Bloomberg asks the Obama administration for stricter gun laws following Colorado shooting. Comedian DL Hughley tweeted, "Aurora is 13yrs and 13 miles from Columbine! Since the 60s over 500,000 ppl have bn killed by guns in the US we have no right 2 b shocked!"

Currently in Aurora, Colorado, where the shooting took place, it is already unlawful to carry a concealed "dangerous weapon," discharge firearms, unless by law enforcement on duty or on shooting range, and have loaded firearm in motor vehicle.

Crime rates alone of cities such as Chicago and Washington D.C. prove that gun bans only increase crime. The D.C. police response rate is eight minutes; most crimes are done in less than one. Gun bans create a trouble-free world for criminals considering no one can defend themselves. If I were ever to face a situation like this, I would want to be prepared.

The propaganda building around the shooter is simply to support the coming attacks on the 2nd Amendment in conjunction with the UN’s agenda of global gun control.

The mainstream media jumped on the gun control bandwagon when Piers Morgan, CNN correspondent, remarked : “America has got to do something about its gun laws. Now is the time. Lunatics like this will always try and get guns. It should be 100,000 times harder than it is for them to do so. That’s my point.”

Gun-control advocates are clamoring around this recent shooting as justification for the Obama administration to come forth and impose legislation against existing gun laws. Jay Carey, White House press secretary told the press while on Air Force One that Obama is committed to “ensuring that those who should not have guns under existing law do not get them. There has been progress in that regard in terms of improving the volume and quality of information in background checks.”

In New York, the UN is holding the International Arms Trade Treaty Conference (ATT) where they are seeking to createan “elaborate a legally binding instrument on the highest possible common international standards for the transfer of conventional arms.”

However, the UN sees the armory of governments as an “effective national control”. To ensure the UN is able to take gun rights away from every citizen in ever country they have devised this treaty to influence “national legislation, regulations and procures on the transfer of arms, military equipment and dual-use goods and technology” for the maintenance of international peace and security.

Obama has been pushing the US Congress to ratify a version of the ATT.

Forty-four Senators, including Jerry Moran have warned Obama not to continue with his support of ATT.


Robin said...

In Reid vs Covert, the Supreme Court ruled that treaties ratified by the Senate and signed by the President can NOT supersede the authority of the Constitution . . .so I would really like to know how they plan to pull this off. I'm concerned about the treaty, for sure . . .but not because of anything in the Supremacy Clause. . .but rather, has there been an Executive Order signed that would make this law of the land? Because while treaties can't supersede the Constitution, EOs CAN.

Caver said...

Good comment Miss Robin. Now, that I did NOT know. So, the Treaty could be signed, and the EO make it the law of the land.

Now, that's scary stuff.

Everybody can read what needs to be said....its between the lines.

Robin said...

Yes, that's my point, Caver. I've heard many speculate the Treaty its self would supersede the Constitution, but case law already argued back in the fifties, very clearly rules the Constitution still realigns supreme over treaties . . .but Executive Orders have the power to circumvent the Constitution and certainly there have been several in recent years that should give us all, pause. My question is, do we even see every Executive Order the President signs? The ones I read online, skip numerals, which causes me to think we don't know what we don't know . . .and that's most unsettling of all. Of course, all we can really do is trust in the Lord and know He's in control . . .

Something else nagging at me . . .everything appears to be lining up for Ezekiel 38-39. . .except for the part about Israel being caught off guard. The stories posted today indicate Israel is very much ON guard right now. Does Ezekiel mean the people will be on guard? Because they're partying like its 1999???

Robin said...

Reigns^. not realigns (my iPad really does have a mind of its own LOL)

Anonymous said...

Colossians3:1 Therefore if you have been raised up with Christ, keep seeking the things ABOVE, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God.
2 Set your mind on the things ABOVE, NOT ON THE THINGS THAT ARE ON
3 For you have died and your life is hidden with Christ in God.

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Federal laws and EOs do not apply to the 50 sovereign states of the union.

After the ratification of the treaty with Spain, congress usurped to itself the power to levy an unconstitutional tariff on Puerto Rico.

By 1900 there were enough traitors on the Supreme Court to rule in favor of congress and effectively created two mutually exclusive legislative governments, just as Mr. Justice Harlan was warning in his dissenting opinion.

Downes vs Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901) Mr. Justice Harlan, dissenting opinion. (Insular Possession cases),

...The idea prevails with some - indeed, it found expression in arguments at the bar - that we have in this country substantially or practically two national governments; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such (absolute*) powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to exercise...

...I take leave to say that if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will be the result. We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism...

...It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside of the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the Constitution.

What congress claimed to itself was that the Constitution only applied to the states of the union, not to the municipal District of Columbia and its territorial possessions. They wanted "exclusive jurisdiction" to mean unfettered by constitutional restraints and they got it via the disastrous Downes ruling.

Many other Justices and law professors also gave similar warnings of what would follow, that congress would begin passing carefully worded laws that sounded like they apply to Citizens of the states when in reality they apply only to DC, federal enclaves & possessions. (like the 1968 gun control act)

"Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many Citizens, because of respect for the law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights due to ignorance." - U.S. v Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187

EOs are simply the Exec branch's version of the same power-grab illusion.
Just say No!

Anonymous said...



Stephen >>>>>>>>>>>>>

number 3 down dead ahead >>>>>>

Robin said...

What are you seeing, Stephen? Futures are only down about 47. I agree, the Bulls are going to get clobbered, but you've been pretty Bullish yourself at least for the year and a half I've been here :). What's got you spooked?

Anonymous said...

Question: How does an unemployed medical student afford $20,000 in exotic weapons gear?

Staged just in time for a vote on the UN small arms treaty?

SWAT clothing and body armor, gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors, explosives, complex booby-traps?

Mike said...

Ya know, that is the first thing that crossed my mind when I heard that! I just figure everyone would think I'm nuts for even saying it (which the only person I mentioned it to thought!)

Anyway....thats how LITTLE I trust anyone in government....and I think it absolutely possible, if not probable....

Anonymous said...

Robin, you do realize that stocks
the space of a few minutes, right ??

I HAVE NO reason to be bullish anymore. AS I HAVE stated many times,
I go by EWI counts and we have put
in a 1 down, a 2 up, and NOW comes
the number 3 down.

Bulls have found that out numerous
times in the past >>>>>>>>>>
like in 1929, 1987, 2008, ect.

you will see that soon enough.

do you use Elliott Wave Robin ??

you should.

Stephen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Caver said...

Mike & Anon, rest assured that you are not the only ones putting this together. It just doesn't add up any way you list the numbers...well, at least not in my mind.

Remember, in these times...nothing is as it seems. Nothing!

This whole episode only holds together when you stay on the surface....get deeper than that and it seems to fall apart pretty easy. Oh well, its early sure more "stuff" is going to fall out of the investigation.

Mrs.C said...

Hi Sister Robin, :)
Israel is not surprised at the invasion of Ezekiel 38-39. They see them coming, and can do nothing to stop it, just as God has orchestrated it to be. It will be Him, and Him alone that will save Israel from the invading Gog forces. This is all about God returning to His People, restoring His Covenant with them. ALL of the Glory will be to Him. :)

God Bless!

Mrs.C said...

Top Honors student...then he begins Med School (I think it was) and begins to not do well.
Obviously mentally ill, without question, as his mother stated right away "you have the right person". Appears he has displayed mental issues with his mother at least, and theres not a whole lot you can do with a child that now becomes an adult with serious mental issues.
Obviously a severe mental disorder, and is not uncommon, very intelligent- but ill. Just a wild guess, but according to whats been said so far, is that he began failing in school. After being in the "top of the top" perhaps this threw him over the edge. Anyway, he stopped going to school in June I believe which is why he had a month to order his evil stuff.
Where did he get the money? I would guess (as many other parents nightmare) that he dropped out of school- didnt tell them - and spent his tuition money. Perhaps also it was time for mom and dad to get a grades report of some kind - or his parents found out -which would have had all sorts of consequences for him...sadly we'll know soon enough the details behind all this...God Bless ALL the families and victims in this tradgety...

Alice said...

I tend to agree with Mrs C on where the money came from. Heck, his government sponsored student loans could have paid for everything.

...continuing to pray for all the families...