It's hard to let this go, as the absurdities continue to pile up...You would think that they would at least attempt to be medically correct, the absence of such is extremely perplexing. In this instance, another physician weighs in stating exactly what I've been thinking...What is even more perplexing, is the fact that these distortions and strange "diagnoses" aren't necessary - you could cover up the truth in a medically factual way, yet they don't. It seems very strange. Surely this physician knows that other physicians wills this and comment. Very strange.
Hillary Clinton’s Nonexistent Diagnosis – No Such Condition As “Non Contagious Bacterial Pneumonia” in ICD-10…
Dr. Wolf is entirely correct. Here’s a link to ICD-10-CM Diagnostic coding. There’s no such diagnosis.
Fake illnesses, fake diagnosis and fake tests. All for a fake candidate. Go figure.
And this isn't mentioning the following :
* If Someone has pneumonia to the degree that you collapse while standing - then you are looking at a very severe stage in pneumonia and the appropriate action would be bedrest and antibiotics. Someone who collapsed from pneumonia would not be parading around the streets 1.5 hours later. No way. Nor would a reasonable physician permit this.
* If bacterial pneumonia occurred in a 68 year old person with an extensive medical history, on a Friday, they would NOT be resuming "normal activities" that very day and/or the following day.
None of this makes any sense.