The international community under the leadership of the US appears to be closing in on signing a new nuclear deal with Iran. On both sides of the negotiating table, there are those who are taking care to create a thick smokescreen to “confuse the enemy.” Sadly, the enemy, in their eyes, isn’t Tehran, but those who oppose a deal with it—primarily Israel.
But the fog of battle eventually clears. Over the past few days, it’s become clear that, despite reports that both sides of the talks were digging in their heels to the point of an impasse and even a crisis, they are in fact nearing a decision.
From the first moment of Joe Biden’s presidency, his administration has openly stated that it is determined to reach a deal at almost any price, one that will allow the US to close the “Iran file” and detach itself from the problems of the Middle East.
The Iranians, for their part, want a deal that will bring them sanctions relief. But they are less enthusiastic about a deal than the Americans, which is why they are making exorbitant demands with which the Americans will apparently comply.
In effect, the Iranians are dragging their feet, not only a negotiating tactic, but also because of their supreme leader’s dilemma—does Iran need a deal at all?
It’s a good question. Why, in fact, does there have to be a deal? No one disputes that the Iranians have made major progress toward nuclear weapons in recent years. Attempts to stop it have slowed Iran’s progress and bought precious time to prepare for what may be inevitable—a nuclear Iran.
No comments:
Post a Comment