In fact, a number of the U.N.’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are directly tied to the implementation of laws that put pressure on global agriculture, ranching, and food sources.
High-ranking Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials within the U.N. system assisted in the development of the SDGs and are currently assisting in directing the organization’s execution of the global strategy.
The U.N.-backed sustainability regulations on agriculture and food production, according to a number of experts, would cause economic ruin, shortages of essential items, widespread starvation, and a significant loss of personal freedoms if not stopped.
Officials predict that as the year goes on, the dangerous food shortages that millions of people are already experiencing will only worsen.
According to experts, there is a hidden goal behind everything.
According to U.N. papers, private land ownership is in the crosshairs as global food production and the global economy are modified to fulfill the global sustainability targets.
The goals set in 2015 “build on decades of work by countries and the U.N.,” as the U.N. explains on its SDG website.
The United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, often referred as Habitat I, which embraced the Vancouver Declaration (read below), was one of the first conferences to define the “sustainability” agenda.
According to the agreement, private land ownership is “a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice,” and “land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals.”
The U.N. resolution stated that “public control of land use is therefore indispensable,” setting up the World Economic Forum’s now-famous “prediction” that by 2030, “you’ll own nothing.”
Since then, a number of U.N. organizations and representatives have described their vision of “sustainability,” which includes demands for significant limits on energy use, consumption of meat, travel, living space, and material wealth.
In an attempt to centralize control over food production and squelch independent farmers and ranchers, some of the richest and most influential corporate leaders in the world are collaborating with communists in China and other countries, says experts.
A “strategic partner” of the U.N. on Agenda 2030 is the WEF, a network of significant international corporations that works closely with the CCP.
As officials from all over the world, including U.S. President Joe Biden and the head of the United Nations World Food Programme David Beasley, warn of impending food shortages worldwide, the regulation of food production is becoming more strict, and there are even attempts to shut down numerous farms and ranches.
However, the policies’ detractors contend that the objective is not at all to protect the environment or stop climate change. The “sustainability” story and the other explanations, the experts caution, are actually a tactic to obtain control over food, farm, and people.
The United Nations and its member nations approved the Sustainable Development Goals, often known as Agenda 2030, in 2015 as a roadmap for “transforming our world.” The 17 goals contain 169 targets covering every aspect of the economy and human life, and are heralded by top U.N. officials as a “master plan for humanity” and a global “declaration of interdependence.”
The document’s preamble states that “no one will be left behind” and states that “all countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan.”
Goal 10 of the U.N. plan includes, among other things, redistribution of wealth on a national and worldwide scale, in addition to “fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services.”
The SDGs emphasize using governments to reform all economic activity, with Goal 12 requiring “sustainable consumption and production patterns.”
Several of the specific goals listed in Goal 12 are closely related to agricultural practices that jeopardize food production. These include “sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.”
No comments:
Post a Comment