Why Macron is banking on the Conference on the Future of Europe
The EU’s bid for greater citizen participation in the political future of the bloc is set to take centre stage on Sunday with the launch of the Conference on the Future of Europe, but certain member states remain sceptical of a project largely conceived from the mind of French President Macron, and his broader political ambitions.
The idea behind the Conference on the Future of Europe is to garner insights from citizens across the EU on the bloc’s long-term objectives and direction. This includes perspectives being submitted on a multilingual digital platform, a series of events, European citizens’ panels, and most importantly, a Conference plenary where findings will be discussed.
At the crux of the matter is essentially a political schism between European federalists who want to infuse more of a democratic legitimacy in how the bloc is run, and some EU member states who believe that their own authority could be diluted by fostering greater involvement from those on the furthest-reaches of the policy-making process: i.e., the citizens themselves.
However, it was a November 2019 paper signed by the French and the Germans that had originally pitched the idea of bridging political and social divides that had been stymieing a more ‘united and sovereign Europe’ as well as a Europe that had a greater influence in international affairs – particularly across security and defence issues, climate change and digitalization.
The paper was driven by the French and had come not long after President Macron’s now ill-famed statement that the NATO alliance was ‘brain-dead’ and Western allies could no longer rely on the US for sufficient support. While Trump has departed the international geopolitical stage since then, Macron is no doubt fearful that a Biden administration – although closer in proximity to European values – still posits the EU at the behest of the Washington decision-making process.
In this vein, the Conference is indeed being presented as the most tangible emblem of the EU’s bid for a sense of strategic autonomy so far.
In this vein, there is a lot that rests on Macon’s support for the Conference on the Future of Europe, and more so when considering that while European federalists and liberals are some of the most ardent supporters of the project, some national governments remain unconvinced as to the ambitions of the undertaking.