Sunday, October 21, 2012

October Surprise A U.S. - Iran Deal On Nuclear Development?


The stories below give conflicting information and the truth probably won't be revealed until sometime between now and the U.S. elections. Either way this will be very interesting to watch in the coming weeks:





Editor’s note: Tonight the New York Times is reporting the Obama administration is opening direct talks with Iran in uranium enrichment issues. WND’s earlier reports, including this one, provide the depth and context for this announcement. Reza Kahlili will discuss this breaking story on an upcoming edition of “Fox and Friends,” time to be announced.

Iranian and U.S. negotiators have reached an agreement that calls for Iran to halt part of its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of many of the U.S. sanctions against the Islamic regime, according to a highly placed source.
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, expects a letter from President Obama in a few days guaranteeing the details of the agreement, arrived at recently during secret negotiations in Doha, Qatar.

The source, who remains anonymous for security reasons and is highly placed in Iran’s regime, said that once Khamenei receives Obama’s guarantees, he will authorize an announcement by Iran on a solution to the nuclear crisis before the U.S. presidential elections.

The agreement calls for Iran to announce a temporary halt to partial uranium enrichment after which the U.S. will remove many of its sanctions, including those on the Iranian central bank, no later than by the Iranian New Year in March. Iran is in the throes of massive inflation and citizen unrest because of the sanctions.

In the meeting, according to the source, the U.S. delegation urged an announcement, even if only on a temporary nuclear deal, before the U.S. elections to help Obama get re-elected. A Romney presidency, the delegation said, would surely move more toward Israel, and the Iranians were reminded that Obama has stood up to Israel against any plans to attack Iran. The regime’s delegate was urged to understand that if Iran does not stand by Obama, Israel will attack Iran.

The European Union, which increased sanctions on Iran last week, fears back-channel negotiations between the Obama administration and Iran will leave it out. EU leaders are seeking to send a group of representatives from seven European countries to Tehran to strengthen their position with the regime over the nuclear program and their economic interests.





The White House on Saturday denied a report in the New York Times that cited unnamed administration officials saying that Iran had agreed to hold direct negotiations over its nuclear program.
“It’s not true that the United States and Iran have agreed to one-on-one talks or any meeting after the American elections,” National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said in a statement.

The New York Times report claimed that the agreement was a result of secret exchanges between officials of both countries dating back to the beginning of President Barack Obama’s term, but that Iranian officials insisted that direct talks wait until after the upcoming presidential election so they would know who they would be negotiating with. Following the White House’s denial, the New York Times added the words “in principle” to describe the agreement.

The report also noted Israel’s response to the said agreement to meet. Israel’s Ambasador to the UN Michael Oren reportedly said the administration had not informed Israel about the agreement, and that the Israeli government feared Iran would use new talks to “advance their nuclear weapons program.”
“We do not think Iran should be rewarded with direct talks,” Oren was quoted as saying, adding that Israel preferred tougher sanctions over direct negotiations.


10 comments:

Seek But Don't Hide said...

From what I know about Islam and their belief in the 12th imam (which they believe must be brought on by causing global chaos) I don' think any negotiations will work. Biblical prophecies say that there will be war and so there will be.

hartdawg said...

Why wouldn't ovomit make a deal with iran? Our "president" and Iran's president are kindred spirits. they share the same religion, the same hatred for america, same hatred for Israel, same hatred for jesus, same hatred for life and everything good in this world. they are both slimy piles of waste who probably crawled out of the same rock. (Perhaps that last sentence was a little much). It makes total sense that they would make a deal.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
GG said...

Stephen~

Clearly there is a HUGE problem in your morning postings. I am graciously going to let Scott handle this one for various reasons.

Your behavior is over the top and resorting to calling me names in the wee hours and names of this sort shows more about your character than mine.

I will use this time to pray for you and we know with the power of prayer many wonderful things can happen. Settle down Dear Brother, it is all good, God has this.

God Bless!!

GG


mary said...

Well it WAS quiet, I was so enjoying the wonderful fellowship with my brothers and sisters "In Christ".
I will ignore Stephen's rant and will continue to fellowship.

Anonymous said...

wow, just...wow :(

JD Siegel said...

God bless you all, the Father loves you, you are all bought by the blood of the Lamb and sealed by the Holy Spirit! We WILL rejoice and be glad!

David said...

This is probably just the first deal with Iran that we found out about.