WikiLeaks told you the Panama Papers were provided by the United States government, George Soros’ various NGOs, and a host of western journalists. Today the proof is irrefutable. A vast network has been established in the last few decades to not only control news, but to influence even the laws under which society operates. Here is the first document in a case against a new world order of things. Here is a revealing look at the new Baltics, and at the true nature of the igneous new world of things.
The Panama Papers revelations are just the latest phase of a misinformation campaign that’s been going on for decades. Today the world is turned upside down by a huge group of journalists and corporate lackeys who have set truth on its end. But my story today is about one tentacle of a beast, one facet of an NWO centurion named George Soros. His “Foundation DOTS”, formerly Soros Foundation Latvia, offers part of the irrefutable proof I speak of. Before I shine a light on this NGO, the reader should be more acquainted with George Soros the financier, George Soros the imposter philanthropist.
Epic Deceivers: George Soros
Born in Budapest in 1930, George Soros’ real names is Gyorgy Schwartz, a moniker he changed when he immigrated to London after World War II. Now estimated to be worth in excess of $26 billion dollars, Soros’ past is not simply jaded, it’s the stuff Hollywood creates super-villains from. A Nazi collaborator in Budapest in 1944 and 1945, teenage Gyorgy sold out his fellow Jews to the Nazis, he helped steal and catalogue their property, while Hitler’s denizens shipped nearly half a million Jewish Hungarians to the death camps.
Soros attended and later graduated from the London School of Economics in the 1950s. He entered the world of banking with the merchant bank Singer & Friedlander of London, and then later moved to the United States to work with F.M. Mayer of New York. Soros’ rise through the ranks of stock speculators is the stuff of legend now. His short of the British Pound play on the Bank of England on Black Wednesday earned him his first billion it is said. But it is not Soros’ money that we should focus on in order to understand his part in today’s chaos, it is his philosophy and strategies. Soros, despite all else, is a rabid deconstructive who has always been enigmatic, a man who turns every rationale in upon itself. This can be seen in his association and borrowing from world renowned philosopher Karl Popper, who theorized what a truly “Open Society” would look like back in the 1940s. There’s no space here for the political theory lesson, but Popper had a dramatic impact on the duality within George Soros. I say “duality” because of the billionaire’s early Budapest days where survival and betrayal, forged the personality Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli might have idealized. This duality is what makes Soros so dangerous, it is what allows he and many others to manipulate the public, to be a philanthropist and a greedy billionaire at the same time.
All anyone needs in order to understand men like George Soros is this fact. Anytime society loses, Soros and the cartel he belongs to wins. Soros is a taker, not a giver, even though he might call this fact simply “business” – and nothing more. You see Soros’ adopted the essences of brilliant men like Karl Popper, then betrayed those ideals whenever he could profit from the understanding of “Open Society” principles. But enough about George Soros, he is simply a liar to himself, and to any semblance of societal order other than elitism. Soros even deceives himself, on a daily basis.
“Now it’s just an oligarchy, with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or to elect the president. And the same thing applies to governors, and U.S. senators and congress members.”
– Former President Jimmy Carter
The 2016 election has been a wild ride, with two insurgent grassroots campaigns literally giving the political establishment a run for its money. But as the events of this presidential primary season play out, it’s becoming clear the U.S. election — and even more so, the presidential race — is a big scam being perpetrated on the American people.
Events from the last week have exposed the system as an illusion of choice and a farce. They have reinforced at least one study showing the U.S. is an oligarchy rather than a democratic republic.
The Wyoming democratic caucus took place on Saturday, purportedly to allow voters to have their voices heard in the race between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. Sanders lost the Wyoming caucus by winning it with a 12 percent margin.
Wait, what?
How does one lose by winning 56 percent of the votes? This happens when the political process is, according to the New York Post, “rigged” by superdelegates. The Post summed up this “strange” phenomenon:
“[U]nder the Democratic Party’s oddball delegate system, Sanders’ winning streak — he has won seven out of the past eight contests — counts for little.
“In fact, despite his win, he splits Wyoming’s 14 pledged delegates 7 to 7 under the caucus calculus.
“Clinton, meanwhile, also gets the state’s four superdelegates — who had already pledged their allegiance to her in January. So despite ‘losing,’ she triumphs 11-7 in the delegate tally.”
Even media pundits on MSNBC openly called the process rigged:
The superdelegate process is complicated, as we’ve noted before, but they have one essential function: to prevent candidates like Bernie Sanders from winning the Democratic nomination.
Don’t believe me? Here’s a video of Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz explaining superdelegates:
Adding insult to injury, even when Sanders does win states (despite Hillary’s advantage in superdelegates), the media can be reliably counted on to discount Sanders’s wins as nothing morethan prolonging the electoral process, which will inevitably elect the presumptive nominee, Hillary Clinton. This pervasive commentary continues despite the fact Sanders only trails her by several hundred pledged delegates.
Meanwhile, according to the same media, the non-establishment Trump campaign is threatened every time Ted Cruz beats him — even though Trump leads by a larger percentage of pledged delegates than Clinton does. When Clinton loses, it doesn’t matter because she already has the nomination locked up. When Trump loses, his campaign is in big trouble. Starting to see the problem with the media coverage?
When you examine these media narratives, a troubling pattern emerges that goes beyond the political establishment’s self-interest. You begin to see that American corporate media also functions as an arm of the political machine, protecting establishment candidates while attacking — or dismissing — candidates who seem non-establishment.
This brings us to the events that transpired during the Republican nomination process in Colorado on Saturday. The Republican Party of Colorado didn’t even bother letting people vote before using arcane rules to strip the democratic process of its democracy. According to the Denver Post:
“Colorado GOP leaders canceled the party’s presidential straw poll in August to avoid binding its delegates to a candidate who may not survive until the Republican National Convention in July.
“Instead, Republicans selected national delegates through the caucus process, a move that put the election of national delegates in the hands of party insiders and activists — leaving roughly 90 percent of the more than 1 million Republican voters on the sidelines.”
“How is it possible that the people of the great State of Colorado never got to vote in the Republican Primary? Great anger — totally unfair!” Trump said on Twitter. “The people of Colorado had their vote taken away from them by the phony politicians. Biggest story in politics. This will not be allowed!”
In an interview on Monday, Trump was even more frank. “The system is rigged, it’s crooked,” he said.
The Colorado GOP didn’t even bother hiding its intentions, tweeting — then quickly removing — what was possibly the most honest insight into the back-door dealing so far this election season:
What we are witnessing — for the first time on a large scale — is the political establishment’s true role in selecting the president of the United States. The illusion of choice has become apparent. The establishment anoints their two picks for president, and the country proceeds to argue vehemently over the two candidates they are spoon-fed. This dynamic is reminiscent of a prophetic 1998 quotefrom philosopher Noam Chomsky:
“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.”
Ahh, the illusion of choice. Sure, in reality there are third party candidates who should be given a fair shake, but in our mainstream media-augmented reality, third parties do not exist. They aren’t mentioned. They aren’t even included in presidential debates. This is another way the media stifles healthy debate, stamps out dissenting opinions, and preserves the status-quo.
“We The People” don’t choose our presidents; they are hand-picked by a powerful group of political party insiders — parties that have long since sold out to the highest bidders. What we have on our hands in America is a rigged oligarchy, and that’s not a conspiracy theory — it’s fact. Now, however, millions of Americans are becoming aware of it thanks to the populist campaigns of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. America’s elections are controlled by a big club, but unfortunately, “you ain’t in it!”
4 comments:
Re: Rigged elections
I too am quite outraged that those candidates (love them or hate them) who have won a state in the primary election will not be getting the delegates that they are entitled to receive. It is becoming so apparent that it does not matter who people vote for if the parties will just choose their own candidate. Perhaps I will finally put a bumper sticker on my car "US elections, what a farce", because that is what it is. What is even more troubling is that I do not hear any outrage from us the voters about all this. I will vote on election day but not for anyone running, I will choose the write-in option and the more people choose to vote but not for those running, the more someone might notice how many of us do not like the fact that our votes no longer count.
I pretty much agree but some sites are covering a lot of people who are outraged at all of this and it seems to be growing (not that it matters sadly)
Mark my words. When the dems screw Bernie out of the nomination, all his supporters are going to finally realize what is going on and its going to get very crazy. I'm expecting them at that point to go for trump. Just out of pure anger. I'm not sure the "elite" are really prepared for how things are going to go.
At this point, I'm seriously thinking I'll write in "Jesus" for my vote in November. He's the only way out this insane world we're living in.
Post a Comment