The horror of the atrocities committed by ISIS has not only dominated headlines, but has also generated a new wave of indignation at the actions of the terrorist group – and those who support them.
But are there more attacks coming? A better question seems to be whether or not these attacks will ever end.
Many are suggesting that the United States is being targeted as well, and that a major attack is in the works.
The Daily Caller reports:
A former FBI counter terrorism expert claims the bloody Nov. 13 Paris attack wasn't a full-fledged assault, but a cold-blooded ISIS "test" to assess its ability to launch small, randomized attacks in a major Western city.
That expert, Eric O'Neill, [says] ISIS was testing the model he called, "small randomized attacks" … "I think this was a test to see how well this could work in a city. Can we coordinate it? Can we effectively carry it out," O'Neill told TheDCNF. "My sense is they are benchmarking themselves. They are going to see if this could be deployed somewhere else because if this was a test, then they passed."
The same test "could have happened in a Washington, D.C. or New York, or Los Angeles and San Francisco, yeah, easily," he said.
[…]
O'Neill believes the U.S. is next on the terrorist group's target list. He said it is now more likely in the post-attack assessment stage.
The likely response will be more security and police state measures, though there may be little that such heavy handed maneuvers can accomplish.
In order to instill the maximum sense of terror, ISIS members are believed to be targeting random venues that don't necessarily have any significance to the governments involved, but do inflict significant numbers of casualties:
The ISIS model is to target smaller, "softer" venues that are hard to protect like bars, restaurants, concert halls and public events.
O'Neill said the tactic generates fear because when random attacks occur, no place is safe. "Small randomized attacks cause a much greater sense of terror than one large attack."
The tone of the war against terrorism amid the conflicting effort to oust Assad has shifted in recent weeks, as Russia has commenced bombing ISIS targets inside Syria.
Now, the brutal nature of their terror mission has been renewed in the public eye, spawning new declarations of war by France, and a fresh wave of support for engagement in the Middle East.
With another round of holidays fast approaching in the shadows of last Friday’s Paris attacks, FBI officials on the front lines of the war on terrorism see a new round of threats rising and worry they don’t have all the tools to cope, according to interviews with The Washington Times.
Bureau officials are deeply worried they don’t have enough resources to track a growing number of radicalized Americans inspired by the Islamic State, with more possibly entering as President Obama opens the borders to thousands of Syrian refugees.
Those fears are also shared in Congress, where support is building for a measure by House Speaker Paul Ryan to temporarily halt any new refugees from entering the country.
Rep. Blake Farenthold, Texas Republican and a member of both of the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform Committees, told a Washington Times radio show Tuesday that the U.S. government does not have the resources to screen a new wave of Syrian refugees for terror ties as the administration has promised.
Added another official: “The administration has a calming public storyline that we have this all under control and life can go on as normal. But we’re one crack in the sidewalk away from a tragedy, and that crack could be an encrypted message we can’t follow, a lead we couldn’t resource or a refugee who slips in like we saw in Paris.”
We've learned some important things about the attacks and the attackers of the Paris massacre. We've learned that ISIS, evidently, either coordinated the attacks or granted operational authority to what I've coined Wilayat Paris. And it appears the coordination efforts came through Belgium, where at least two of the radical Islamists have been discovered to be from the same neighborhood.
Some have asked why they have waited until now to strike. Terrorists have been threatening for years that they plan to attack us and Europe—virtually since its forming, the new ISIS caliphate has been threatening attacks. So what's taken so long?
Well, Europe, and, to a lesser extent, America have many majority Muslim regions. They've been coming for years and settling in major cities across Europe. Anyone who understands "Civilization Jihad" knows this is how radical Islam has always intended to conquer the West.
We don't actually think the flood of refugees is to escape the "war torn" regions of Iraq and Syria, do we? To be sure, some have - but when the majority of these "refugees" are young males of "fighting age," should we not be questioning why? Some estimates are higher than 70% of the "refugees" are young men. Of course, why would people question it if they see these mass migrations through the filter of the main stream liberal press, who only show and report on women and children.
These Muslim refugees are certainly not all escaping the fight. They are, in fact, an ISIS Trojan Horse. They prey on the sympathy and empathy of the West – knowing full well where the soft targets are – the easy marks. The Palestinian terrorists have been doing it to Israel for decades – faking casualties and funerals and blaming the "carnage" on ruthless Israeli attacks. And we in West predictably fall for the theatre every time.
So where are the jihadists settling? They are heading for Europe's many No-Go Zones, of which the left likes to deny the existence. And this is where at least two of the Paris jihadists were from – a neighborhood in Brussels, Belgium, known as Molenbeek.
"Molenbeek is a working class neighborhood in Brussels with a high Muslim population, which has been linked to jihadism several times over the years." So far, seven people have been arrested in this district with ties to the Paris attacks. The British paper, the Guardian, has penned it as "Europe's Jihadi Central."
The Belgian government has admitted that they do not "have control of the situation in Molenbeek."
These "No-Go Zones" are run as virtual States within a State, where those of other denominations are unwelcome (to say the least), Sharia Law trumps all, and even police don't venture in, unless en masse. There are many of these zones, such as those in Germany, Sweden, Belgium, France, and the U.K., where some may recognize names like Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest.
In the U.S., none is more famous, or infamous, than Dearborn, Michigan. They are fast becoming completely segregated, closed-off societies.
So, knowing what we know about these No-Go Zones, is it really much of a stretch to then assume that jihadists are holed up here in Dearbornistan, just waiting to be "activated," like those in Paris?
Many have said we must fight them over there so we avoid fighting them here, but that ship has sailed. As I said, many are already here, and if Obama has his way, thousands more will be arriving soon.
I believe ISIS has taken this long to "kick off" attacks in order to martial sufficient forces in several regions to wreak havoc on the West. Their leadership has, evidently, concluded they have enough to begin.
Marine Le Pen, the leader of Front Nationale Party in France, has been a bulwark against the Muslims invasion of her country. Yet, now, she is not only standing against a Muslim invasion, but also pushing for her country to be re-armed in light of the Muslim threat.
Le Pen not only said that Islam must be "eradicated" from France, but also that "further demanded that border controls be made 'permanent' and binational Islamists must be deprived of their French passport."
Le Pen stated, "France was given the vulnerable; it must re-arm because for too long suffered a collapse of its scheduled protection and defense capabilities, face yet predictable threats is growing."
Le Pen also called for the closing of Islamic mosques, something French President Hollande has also done, and the expulsion of those who preach the message of Islam in France.
Following the Muslim jihad attacks on Friday evening in Paris, Le Pen took the top spot in the French Presidency Poll.
Here's the real issue that neither Hollande nor Le Pen are addressing: The arming of its citizens. There is no doubt in my mind that armed citizens in the areas of jihad attack in Paris would have been able to stop the bloodshed. I am not saying there would not have been bloodshed, but it would have been extremely limited due to an armed citizenry.
Let me be blunt: France, you succumbed to what you did on Friday because you allowed your government to infringe on your right, yes your duty, to defend yourself and your neighbors. And why? It was because you bought into the lie that your government can provide security for you. They cannot.
They are cancelling games all over Europe. Another arena was also evacuated before a concert, and a train station was also shut down.
What an iconic target — the Europeans LOVE their football (soccer).
How long before the running dogs in the media blame …. us?
Just days after ISIS terrorists attacked Paris, an ambulance packed with explosives was found outside of a soccer stadium in Hannover, Germany, a German newspaper reported.
The truck disguised as a rescue vehicle was found before the German national team was set to play Netherlands on Tuesday, which led to the evacuation of the HD Arena and the cancellation of the game.
Police said they had a "concrete threat" that there was a planned explosion at the arena.
The German soccer team was playing against France when the terror attacks occurred on November 13.
President Obama hopes to make gun control the top issue of his final year in office, saying Americans aren’t more violent than other people but they “have more deadly weapons to act out their rage.”
In an interview published Tuesday in GQ magazine, Mr. Obama said easy access to guns is “the only variable” between the U.S. and other developed countries.
“The main thing that I’ve been trying to communicate over the last several of these horrific episodes is that, contrary to popular belief, Americans are not more violent than people in other developed countries,” Mr. Obama said. “But they have more deadly weapons to act out their rage.”
Asked by interviewer Bill Simmons of HBO if gun control will be the “dominant” issue on his agenda next year, Mr. Obama replied, “I hope so.”
The number “10,000 Syrian refugees” is being thrown around a lot by the mainstream media, but did you know that Barack Obama has actually publicly declared that the U.S. is going to take in 100,000 refugees from Syria and elsewhere for each of the next two years? That is an absolutely massive number, and it is inevitable that some jihadists will slip through the vetting process. As Syrian refugees enter the United States, they are being dispersed all around the country. In my article yesterday, I explained that the State Department has established refugee processing centers in 48 U.S. states. But instead of the “trickle” of refugees the mainstream media is talking about, the truth is that it is going to be more like a flood. The following is a message that was tweeted by Barack Obama’s official Twitter account on September 28th…
So there you have it.
And in particular, the Obama administration has been looking for ways to “accelerate” the number of refugees coming in from Syria. The following comes from the CBC…
The Obama administration is moving to increase and accelerate the number of Syrian refugees who might be admitted into the United States by opening new screening outposts in Iraq and Lebanon, administration officials told Reuters on Friday.
That same article quoted an Obama administration official as saying that they wanted to “push out really ambitious goals” for the number of Syrian refugees being brought in…
“We want to be in a place where we can push out really ambitious goals,” said one of the officials, who spoke to Reuters on the condition of anonymity.
The State Department runs nine screening centres worldwide that serve as meeting points for refugees and U.S. Department of Homeland Security employees who have to decide who is suitable for resettlement in the United States.
You would think that what just happened in France would cause Obama and his minions to reassess this strategy.
But instead, they appear to be doubling down. In fact, at the G20 summit Obama lectured his fellow world leaders on the need to take in more Syrian refugees.
Also see:
No comments:
Post a Comment