Monday, April 4, 2016

China Sends Flotilla Of Attack Submarines To U.S. West Coast



This is a rather significant development:


China Deploys Nuke Subs to US West Coast; Invokes Defense Treaty with Russia




China has invoked Article 9 of the Sino-Russian Treaty of Friendship (FCT) notifying Russia that they have begun offensive/defensive military movements to protect national interests – including the deployment of a flotilla of attack submarines to the west coast of America.

China’s announcement comes just one day after President Xi Jinping warned President Obama that the two countries were perilously close to war: 
“China will firmly safeguard the sovereignty and related rights in the South China Sea and will not accept any freedom of navigation as an excuse to undermine China’s sovereignty and national security interests.”

Article 9 of this treaty, states that: “When a situation arises in which one of the contracting parties deems that peace is being threatened and undermined or its security interests are involved or when it is confronted with the threat of aggression, the contracting parties shall immediately hold contacts and consultations in order to eliminate such threats.”


In the formal PRC government document invoking Article 9 of this treaty, delivered by diplomatic pouch to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese authorities state their vital national interests are now under immediate threat due to:
  •  Continued military provocation(s) against the PRC by the United States in the South China Sea, AND;
  • A direct threat of nuclear war made against the PRC by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and resulting preparations by the United States and its allies to “intervene/interfere” in.

    

Coinciding with the PRC’s invoking Article 9 of the FTC, China also made an immediate economic protectionist move against the United States and its allies by imposing a new tax system on all overseas purchases—which, ironically, billionaire US presidential candidate Donald Trump had threatened to do against the Chinese if he was elected.
Analysts contributing to this report say China’s “preparations for conflict” with the United States include their military setting up “non-war” units able to evacuate their citizens from foreign territories, establishing a massive military base in the Horn of Africa to counter American aggression in the Middle East, and their deployment of the world’s longest range nuclear missile.
As per the protocol and procedures to be followed once Article 9 was invoked by the PRC, Russia Security Council Chairman President Putin directed the Ministry of Defense (MoD) and Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) to immediately begin all needed steps to “ameliorate/alleviate” this conflict and to, likewise, assess its potential to harm the national interests of the Russian Federation.  THe order required Russian entities "take all necessary means needed to protect the citizens of Russia both at home and in potential war zones."

A rather lengthy conclusion to this report written by MoD intelligence analysts shockingly states that the American people's knowledge of this conflict is nearly non-existent, in spite of the many warnings issued to them about it these past few weeks — including US Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work announcing that the Obama administration would not recognize any air defense identification zone that China might proclaim in the South China Sea, and Washington Post columnist David Ignatius warning that “the US is heading toward a dangerous showdown in China.”

Kurt Campbell, the former US Assistant Secretary of State for Asia, perhaps, gave the most accurate warning to the American people about this coming war by stating “This isn’t Pearl Harbor, but if people on all sides aren’t careful, it could be ‘The Guns of August.’” Campbell was referring to the Pulitzer prize winning book by Barbara Tuchman on the events that led up to World War I, which led to the deaths of 17 million people — a miniscule amount when compared to the hundreds-of-millions, if not billions, who would die in a World War III.





8 comments:

Gary said...

Dear Scott:
I know that you recently had a post on how we're not receiving all of the news. This is a pretty big story, and I'm not saying that it isn't true. I just did a search on this story, I just wish that it was corroborated by a major player in the press, and I haven't seen one as of yet.

Lance M said...

Wow....

Lance

David Pearson said...

Gary,

One of my jobs in the UNITED STATES MARINES was force recon. We would drop in on your 6 from 30,000 ft. Halo style, and kill any threat encountered.

My other background is in intelligence. I can tell you, that in regards to this story, it's legit. You just have no idea the degree. I have contacts everywhere. All over the world.....this is the real deal........ And your only getting the smallest part of what's going down.....

Be vigilant my friends. Until the Lord God calls us. HOORAH!!!!

Pearson

Scott said...

David - Many thanks for your input, it is most welcome here. I'm sure you have to be careful, but please feel free to weigh in with your expertise. I suspected a lot more is going on...I had heard that China would like to take out the power grid on parts of the east coast - I wonder if they will use N Korea to do this, so they can deny responsibility....But I have heard variations on this scenario from some pretty reliable sources. But your sources are probably much better than that - if you can lend any credibility or denial to this scenario?

James said...

Hi Scott this story was posted on whatdoesitmean.com the news site is what i would call
very unrealiable on the source of the stories i do think such a situation like this main stream news sites would be all over it even though they themselfs are at the moment
trying very hard to dumb the people of the world down, its to big an event for them to ignore
James

Scott said...

Well,its like I have said before - I post whats "out there" and I don't have a staff that can vet every article in real time...I estimate that around 20,000+ articles have been posted over the years and occasionally one will slip through. We - as always- have to use discernment when viewing what's out there in circulation. We'll see on this story - but a few months ago, it was confirmed that chinese subs were near alaska, so its not a stretch

Caver said...

Whwow...this one kind of crawled up on me south side while I was facing north.

David, fist of all, thanks for your service! Second, thanks for that insight. This gives the story a believability quality above just media hyping "stuff".

Is just amazing how far down the road and close to war we've gotten in Ukraine, the ME, and now China without the public being given a real clue to the seriousness of things. On this one, it doesn't appear even the European press is saying much of anything.

Turo said...

This news seems to have been "scrubbed" from the main stream news. I originally saw this on AbcNews.com and now ..nothing. Still on Youtube though.