We are not being told the truth on the Gulf situation. That alone leads to an array of questions.
First, (and this news is somewhat dated) - we know there has been a news-media blackout regarding the Gulf, therefore we only have information which is fed by the U.S. Administration and BP. This is even recognized by the MSM:
"Gulf 'media blackout' hits MSM"
"Gulf 'Media Blackout' Triggers Journalist Fury"
"Anderson Cooper Reports on Obama;s BP/Gulf Blackout"
This blackout raises many uncomfortable questions, and no answers are in sight. The array of questions raised is vast, and now, with a blackout imposed, the conspiracy theories are rampant. Appropriately. That's what happens in the midst of a government imposed media blackout. The main question here is "WHY?".
Wait, there is more.
Now we see that the U.S. Navy has evacuated the Gulf, under a laughable premise. The Navy is headed to Costa Rica:
"46 US Warships plus 7,000 US Marines on Route To Costa Rica"
On the 2nd July 2010 the Costa Rica Congress authorized the entry of 46 U.S. warships capable of carrying 200 helicopters and warplanes, plus 7,000 U.S. Marines "who may circulate the country in uniform without any restrictions" , plus submarine killer ships to the Costa Rican coast for "anti-narcotics operations and humanitarian missions' between 1st July 2010 until 31st December 2010.
On Sunday, the President of Costa Rica Laura Chinchilla said that the government does not intend to militarize the fight against drugs and the Minister of Public Security Jose Maria Tijerino stressed that this huge, powerful military force would be under the command of the US Coast Guard and not the US Navy.
"Costa Rica to Allow US to send Troops"
To say that Costa Rica suddenly needs 46 U.S. warships and 7,000 U.S. Marines, to fight a "drug war", quite frankly, insults what little intelligence I have left. It's a clear evacuation for other reasons, reasons which are obviously not being disclosed. Again, the obvious question is "WHY?"
"U.S. NAVY EVACUATES GULF"
The Navy is obviously worried about either poison from the methane/corexit 9500 mix or a massive methane explosion/tsunami. A tsunami fits with the NOAA blackout of the U.S. tsunami warning system. It also explains why BP is not actively cleaning up the oil on the beaches. Why clean them up if they are going to be gone.
We are sending a war level force of 46 naval ships to stop drugs in Costa Rica which is roughly the size of Vermont with less coast line than Louisiana. Why has the mainstream media not mentioned this massive military buildup? Obviously it is not a buildup…it is an evacuation.
If you are in the gulf coast region you should consider evacuating.
Here is another article on the evacuation.
Here is a link to the military.com article
There is more:
For anyone who has kept up with this massive "leak" - then you will know that last night another cap was attempted for this underwater "volcano". However this effort was suddenly stopped. Again, "WHY?".
Perhaps there is a reason, but it requires reading between the lines (all we have at our disposal):
"Gulf Oil Leak Gushing While Cap Is Analyzed"
The plan to start choking off oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico was suddenly halted as government officials and BP said further analysis must be done Wednesday before critical tests could proceed.
No explanation was given for the decision, and no date was set for when testing would begin on the new, tighter-fitting cap BP installed on the blown-out well Monday.
OK. The process was suddenly stopped. Lets see what else is going on:
A series of methodical, preliminary steps were completed before progress stalled. Engineers spent hours on a seismic survey, creating a map of the rock under the sea floor to spot potential dangers, like gas pockets. It also provides a baseline to compare with later surveys during and after the test to see if the pressure on the well is causing underground problems.
An unstable area around the wellbore could create bigger problems if the leak continued elsewhere in the well after the cap valves were shut, experts said.
"It's an incredibly big concern," said Don Van Nieuwenhuise, director of Professional Geoscience Programs at the University of Houston. "They need to get a scan of where things are, that way when they do pressure testing, they know to look out for ruptures or changes."
Scientists will be looking for high pressure readings of 8,000 to 9,000 pounds per square inch. Anything lower than 6,000 might indicate previously unidentified leaks in the well.
So...If the current effort to cap the well revealed a pressure drop and if the leak continued elsewhere after the capping (as evidenced by a pressure drop below 6,000) then, as the quote above indicates, "It's an incredibly big concern".
I have no idea, but it seems very strange. A blackout (from the "most transparent government...ever"). Concerns over a methane bubble that could blow, triggering an epic tsunami. Toxicity in the Gulf that isn't being reported (there is a blackout, remember?). The Navy evacuates the region and doesn't even bother to give a credible explanation. Now BP suddenly stops the capping process without giving an explanation, only that there are significant concerns about a cap causing leaks elsewhere.
There is more:
"Our Toxic Gulf: A Wakeup Call"
“I’ve never seen anything like it. We’re seeing pods of whales and dolphins out in the oil, and lots of dead things. Things I’ve never seen before coming up from the deep…floating, dead.”
BP and the federal government, using various guises, continue to spray, pump, and dump, the oil dispersant Corexit into the Gulf of Mexico. Nobody seems to know exactly how many gallons of that stuff has been flushed into the Gulf.
The same folks who have been lying to us about the amount of oil gushing from the underwater wellhead, are not going to be truthful regarding how much Corexit has been used. A rough guesstimate would be around 2 million gallons, to date.
Marine toxicologist, Dr. Rikki Ott, who worked on the Exxon Valdez oil spill, warns that people are surprised when these “flu-like” symptoms hang on for months, and then years, and then…“they’re dead.” These toxins may take their time, but eventually they get the job done.
And, of course, a mixture of oil and Corexit is worst of all. Marine toxicologist Dr. Susan Shaw, founder and director of the Marine Environmental Research Institute, informs us that “This stuff is so toxic combined… Very, very toxic, and goes right through skin.”
That article was pretty factual. What about the conspiracies? I don't know what to believe, but there are a growing number of articles discussing various scenarios such as this one:
"Is the Oil Spill Staged"
This article is worth opening, just because there are so many provided links. The rabbit hole goes pretty deep on this one. As the author says below "I don't personally believe that the oil spill disaster was staged....So why do I bring up the possibility? Because we are being lied to by both the federal government and BP"
Let me say up front that, personally, I don’t believe that the oil spill disaster was staged (although I believe that much of the clean-up may well be). So why do I bring up the possibility? Because we are being lied to by both the federal government and BP, and at this point all possible explanations for the oil spill need to remain on the table.
In summation: the people who believe that the oil spill is being staged are not denying the reality of the oil spill—the oil’s real enough, all right. They are saying that the disaster was rigged (pun noted), and that the clean-up is a sham. (Link)
I should mention that the above reasons given for a “staged” oil spill apply to several other theories as well.
There are a number of theories surrounding the oil spill, and all but the patently ridiculous need to be kept in play, until we learn the truth. If a “staged event” scenario seems too tame for you, there’s always the methane mega-bubble theory.
To put all of this in prophetic perspective, the following points seem highly germane:
- Deception and lies will be the "order of the day" during the Tribulation. We are seeing the beginning process of a tightly controlled world-wide media (in this case, controlled by the U.S. Administration), all marching in lockstep.
- We are not being told the truth on the Gulf crisis. There must be a reason. What could it be?
- The Navy has clearly evacuated the Gulf, and the flimsy excuse just bolsters the idea that something ominous is occurring
in the Gulf. That leads to speculation as to what exactly is causing this concern.
- We know that the mixture of the oil and dispersants is toxic. The media (even the MSM) has attempted to enter one of several
mobile medical units, but no one is allowed access.
No one knows at this point. The information is being tightly controlled and manipulated.
The Tribulation looms - it seems like everything we see these days is simply a trial run for the imminent future - a future which will consist of nothing but lies and deceptions.