DERRICK BROZE
In September the United Nations' 79th General Assembly will host the highly-anticipated "Summit of the Future" where nations will sign the "Pact of the Future", representing a major step towards the creation of a world government.
As the United Nations prepares for the 79th session of the UN General Assembly, the general public seems dangerously unaware of the UN's plans for the "Summit of the Future". It is at the Summit where member states are expected to declare a "planetary emergency" as part of the so-called "Pact for the Future".
Although the UNGA is an annual meeting, this year's gathering is unique because of the addition of the Summit of the Future, which will take place in New York City on the 22nd and 23rd of September.
The summit has been in the making since at least 2022 after repeated calls by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to shift financial resources to rapidly complete the Agenda 2030 goals set by the UN in 2015.
In September 2021, the Secretary-General released his report, Our Common Agenda, which called for accelerating the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals and the commitments contained in the UN75 Declaration. Our Common Agenda also called for a Summit of the Future to "forge a new global consensus on readying ourselves for a future that is rife with risks but also opportunities".
The Summit of the Future website says the outcome of the Pact for the Future will be "a world - and an international system - that is better prepared to manage the challenges we face now". The Pact for the Future is likely to be another piece of the shift towards a world governed by unelected internationalist politicians.
During the Summit of the Future, UN member states are also likely to vote to radically alter the UN itself -- what some are calling UN 2.0 -- and the very nature of how nation-states make decisions regarding the future of the planet.
The UN has also recently announced their plan to sign a "Global Digital Compact" at the Summit of the Future. The stated purpose of the GDC is "to establish an inclusive global framework, essential for multi-stakeholder action required to overcome digital, data and innovation divides". The UN claims the compact will help advance an "open, free, secure, and human-centered digital future for all" while helping complete the Sustainable Development Goals.
Although news of the Summit of the Future and Pact for the Future have begun to creep into the independent media space, the public at large is still completely unaware of this meeting and the implications of the agreements being discussed.
Jeffrey Sachs: Advocate of World Government
Despite the public's ignorance, the Summit of the Future is catching on in academia. For example, economist Jeffrey Sachs recently published an op-ed on the Summit, extolling the virtues of the UN's efforts.
Sachs may be familiar to readers because of his chairing of the Lancet's COVID-19 Commission between 2020 and 2022, a position which he used to question the source of the COVID-19 panic. In March 2023, Sachs also testified in front of the U.S. Congress regarding funding of gain-of-function research and the "lab leak theory". He has been prominently featured on alternative media, including Jimmy Dore and Russell Brand.
However, Sachs has long been a proponent for the UN and their SDGs. Sachs is Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University. It should also be noted that Columbia University is the home of the original Technocracy movement. Sachs is also the President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, and served as Special Advisor to the UN Secretary General from 2001 to 2018. He also advised previous UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
So it should come as no surprise that on June 21st Sachs was advocating for the Summit of the Future and a world government system.
Of course, the call for world government is couched in terms like "multilateralism", but the end goal is the same -- the end of nation-states and the implementation of a world governing body with power to affect national policies.
"The world's geopolitical system is not delivering what we want or need. Sustainable development is our declared goal, meaning economic prosperity, social justice, environmental sustainability, and peace. Yet our reality is continued poverty amidst plenty, widening inequalities, deepening environmental crises, and war," Sachs wrote.
Sachs continued by claiming that the Summit of the Future is focused on tackling "a set of unprecedented challenges that can only be solved through global cooperation". According to Sachs and the Technocrats at the UN, the "polycrisis", or multiple, simultaneous crises, cannot be "solved by any one country alone."
In fact, Sachs makes it perfectly clear that from his position he is advocating for giving the UN more power to implement policies for the entire world.
"On the goal of reforming the UN system, the key is to give more power to UN institutions and to make them more representative," he states. Sachs also echoes previous calls for new financial instruments to fund the transformation of the world, including with a "new system of international taxes" on CO2 emissions, shipping, aviation, and financial transactions.
"A transformed international financial architecture is fit for purpose, more inclusive, just, representative, effective, and resilient, responsive to the world today rather than as it looked following the Second World War. This architecture invests up-front in SDGs, climate action, and future generations."
These calls mirror similar ones made during the "Summit for a New Global Financing Pact" held in Paris, France in June 2023. The Summit, led by French President Emmanuel Macron, welcomed 50 heads of state, representatives of NGOs and civil society organizations to discuss the effort to reset the international financial system as part of the continued push towards the 2030 Agenda and Net Zero goals.
The French government stated that the objective of the gathering was to "build a new contract between [the global] North and South" which will better equip the nations to fight poverty and climate change. The summit was attended by US President Joe Biden, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. In addition to heads of state, the summit was organized with support from the Open Society Foundations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation, among others.
What Comes After The Summit of the Future?
As Michele Sison notes in her Stimson Center presentation, the globalist meetings build on top of each other, adding more pieces to the Technocratic State, bit by bit. As such, despite the importance of the Summit of the Future, it will not be the last effort to push humanity towards one world government.
"The Summit of the Future is a step, it is an important step, it is just one step along a continuum of efforts to close gaps and make the UN more effective in addressing these challenges," Sison stated.
Sison also notes that the work on turning the UN into a world government will continue with future meetings, including the Second World Summit for Social Development.
One thing is clear, the Summit of the Future, the Pact for the Future, and the Declaration of a Planetary Emergency need more attention. And fast. Otherwise, the freethinking people of the world will be in the same position we have often found ourselves -- looking back to the past with the benefit of hindsight, wishing that we had paid attention before it was too late to stop the advancement of the Technocratic State.
If we want to meaningfully challenge the Stimson Center, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and the many other tentacles of this Shadow Government Octopus, we must spread this knowledge as far and wide as possible, as quickly as we can.
With less than 60 days until the UN's Summit of the Future and a potential declaration of a Planetary Emergency we must do what we can to educate the public about this meeting and the danger it poses to national sovereignty, and thus, individual sovereignty.
No comments:
Post a Comment