Tony Blair, or to give him his full title, Sir Anthony Charles Lynton Blair served as the Prime Minister of the UK from 1997 to 2007 and was the Leader of the Labour Party from 1994 to 2007. He was best known perhaps for buddying up with George W Bush and joining the UK with the US war in Iraq which resulted in millions of needless deaths and a label of “war criminal” for Blair. However, Blair, now 70 years old, does not lay low and enjoy anonymity and retirement as we might imagine he would following his disastrous time as leader. Author Paul Cudenec says,
“There is something very odd about the way that former British Prime Minister Tony Blair has never quite left the centre of the political stage.”
Paul Cudenec who is author of Winter Oak, which is according to Cudenec, an exploration of deep dives, shows what Tony Blair has been up to since he was the UK PM and his connection to the Rothschilds.
Tony Blair And The Rothschilds
by Author at Winter Oak Paul Cudenec
He is so widely loathed by the British public – as a hypocritical war criminal who used the Labour Party to advance a cruel neoliberal agenda – that when he was given a knighthood by the British state in 2022, more than a million people signed a petition demanding the honour be rescinded.
And yet “Tony Bliar”, as he is often known, just won’t do us all a favour and disappear into the political wings for good.
He is constantly hinting at a return to British politics and popping up in the corporate media to offer his advice on how the world should be run, whether calling for the UK’s Brexit from the EU to be reversed, accusing Jeremy Corbyn of “antisemitism“, or demanding the imposition of vaccine passports and digital ID.
The latest nauseating news is that the 70-year-old warmonger, once suggested as full-time “president of Europe” by the then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, is now being “touted by Israel as peacekeeper in Middle East”, to quote The Daily Telegraph’s headline from November 13, 2023.
The report explains that “serving as the envoy for the Middle East Quartet from 2007 to 2015”, Blair was handed the task of helping develop the Palestinian economy, with his role overlapping with Netanyahu’s second term.
It adds that Blair, who has an office in Israel, “was also a member of Labour Friends of Israel for decades when in Parliament”.
Indeed, his refusal to call for a ceasefire in the 2006 conflict between Israel and Lebanon, together of course with his ongoing unpopularity due to the invasion of Iraq and the so-called “War on Terror”, is regarded as the main reason why he was forced to resign as PM in 2007.
In 2009, Blair was awarded Israel’s Dan David Prize for “exceptional leadership and steadfast determination in helping to engineer agreements and forge lasting solutions to areas in conflict”, just five years after the $1 million annual hand-out went to WEF boss Klaus Schwab.
So how is it that Blair remains such a key global figure more than 16 years after he left public office in the UK?
A fascinating article by researcher Ben Rubin, which has just come my way, provides an important clue.
Rubin was looking into the UK charity My Life My Say, which collaborates closely with the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change and seems to be trying to build a remote-controlled “youth movement”, similar to the WEF’s Global Shapers, to shape politics in the UK.
And in June 2022 Blair was the main speaker at a conference on the “Future of Britain” organised with My Life My Say and hosted by the Institute of Global Health Innovation at Imperial College, London.
In investigating the background of My Life My Say’s trustees, Rubin discovered something that he describes as a “biggie”, adding: “To be honest, I almost fell off my chair when I saw it”.
He writes, accurately, that My Life My Say trustee Glen Manning is a senior banker with Rothschild & Co. I also note that he has enjoyed a long career with known Rothschild entities like J.P. Morgan.
In 2021 Manning became Portfolio Advisor to R&Co4Generations, a Rothschild “philanthropic” fund which is explicitly involved in the new form of public-private digital slavery known as impact investment and in the promotion of the closely-related United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
It claims its mission is all about “empowering the next generations” and chair Alexandre de Rothschild writes of a desire to “create lasting and positive change”.
There is perfect synergy there with the title of Blair’s global institute and indeed with all the fake-left impact-based organisations that talk incessantly about “social change”.
The important thing to realise is that they don’t mean change for the better!
The aim of both the Rothschilds and Blair is to wipe out what is left of traditional human life and freedom in order to impose their new world order of artifice, surveillance and control, in which the 99.9% are confined in smart-city gulags, eating insects, while the criminal ultra-rich are free to treat the rest of the world as a privatised party-zone and safari park.
The suggestion that Blair has always been working for the Rothschilds’ agenda makes perfect sense to me.
By 1997, when he became Prime Minister, their connections to the corrupt Tory regime in the UK were becoming all-too-obvious, with the revolving doors between Rothschild HQ at London’s New Court and the corridors of political power attracting increasing attention, as historian Niall Ferguson has noted.
Blair also wants to see “modernisation” of public services in the UK, including, of course, the National Health Service.
This would facilitate the impact agenda by imposing digital health accounts, with data held centrally in a “new NHS cloud infrastructure” and “used as a collective national asset to help our life-science sector to be world-leading”.
Just to make sure we get the point, Blair’s report envisages “turning the Genomic Medicine Service into a fully fledged part of the health system, providing whole-genome sequencing to all patients”.
Schoolkids are on the Blair radar as well. His proposals for “reforming” education include:
“1. Establishing a digital learner ID that would contain all educational
information, enabling a personalised education for every child.
“2. Increasing parent choice and access to quality education by giving
schools the freedom to provide hybrid lessons and parents the right to
request online classes delivered by other schools, incentivising schools
to improve performance.
“3. Overhauling Ofsted so that accountability is based on real-time insights
and geared towards continuous improvement of standards”.
No comments:
Post a Comment