And so we come to the repeating effort by the WHO to bring about worldwide vaccinations through the machinery set up in 2004 for pandemic declarations:
1. A precursor was the 1976 Swine Flu : Believing 60 million Americans out of 221 million would be infected and a million would die, (the U.S. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare had announced "We will see a return of the 1918 flu virus that is the most virulent"), the CDC proclaimed 80% of the population would need to be vaccinated-money for which Congress provided immediately, anticipating good press for saving their constituents from a plague.
100-million flu vaccine shots were manufactured and administered to 49-million people, of whom 4,000 claimed damages for injury, including 532 partially paralyzed with Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare neurological condition, and 32 dying before the government shut down the program after 10 weeks. In the end, despite the panic, only one person died of the Swine Flu while the drug companies made out nicely financially;
2. 2002-3, the SARS epidemic saw 8,098 sickened from what may have been SARS and potentially 774 dying (in the US, only 8 out of 29 possible cases were confirmed to have died of SARS). The WHO issued a global alert and worked to identify SARS and so find a vaccine. Since then, nobody has caught SARS. Of note is that the symptoms for SARS are similar to flu, which kills 290,000-650,000 each year and never has resulted in a WHO global alert;
3. 2004, WHO organized a board of experts to create pandemic guidelines ; these obliged governments to purchase billions of dollars of hastily manufactured vaccines whenever the WHO declaring a pandemic. Some of these board members had received consulting fees from drug manufacturers Roche and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK);
4. 2005, the avian flu H5N1 fails to materialize as a pandemic despite the flu czar asserting 150 million deaths would result worldwide and world governments dutifully forking over billions on vaccines that were not used;
5. 2009, The H1N1 Swine Flu was declared a global pandemic by the WHO: Two billion were expected to catch it and "several hundred thousand could die [in the US] if a vaccine campaign and other measures aren't successful." (Official Statement of Obama Administration-guided by Dr. Fauci at the NIAID-API, 24 July 2009). This WHO announcement triggered contracts with half-a-dozen major pharmaceutical companies to manufacture a vaccine for which they were paid about $40 billion by the taxpayers.
Most of these vaccines were destroyed because the H1N1 pandemic also failed to materialize (144 deaths worldwide after 11 weeks, way less than the annual flu mortalities), although 60 million (mostly children) received GlaxoSmithKline's Pandemrix and hundreds of them ended up brain damaged.
1. A precursor was the 1976 Swine Flu : Believing 60 million Americans out of 221 million would be infected and a million would die, (the U.S. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare had announced "We will see a return of the 1918 flu virus that is the most virulent"), the CDC proclaimed 80% of the population would need to be vaccinated-money for which Congress provided immediately, anticipating good press for saving their constituents from a plague.
100-million flu vaccine shots were manufactured and administered to 49-million people, of whom 4,000 claimed damages for injury, including 532 partially paralyzed with Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare neurological condition, and 32 dying before the government shut down the program after 10 weeks. In the end, despite the panic, only one person died of the Swine Flu while the drug companies made out nicely financially;
2. 2002-3, the SARS epidemic saw 8,098 sickened from what may have been SARS and potentially 774 dying (in the US, only 8 out of 29 possible cases were confirmed to have died of SARS). The WHO issued a global alert and worked to identify SARS and so find a vaccine. Since then, nobody has caught SARS. Of note is that the symptoms for SARS are similar to flu, which kills 290,000-650,000 each year and never has resulted in a WHO global alert;
3. 2004, WHO organized a board of experts to create pandemic guidelines ; these obliged governments to purchase billions of dollars of hastily manufactured vaccines whenever the WHO declaring a pandemic. Some of these board members had received consulting fees from drug manufacturers Roche and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK);
4. 2005, the avian flu H5N1 fails to materialize as a pandemic despite the flu czar asserting 150 million deaths would result worldwide and world governments dutifully forking over billions on vaccines that were not used;
5. 2009, The H1N1 Swine Flu was declared a global pandemic by the WHO: Two billion were expected to catch it and "several hundred thousand could die [in the US] if a vaccine campaign and other measures aren't successful." (Official Statement of Obama Administration-guided by Dr. Fauci at the NIAID-API, 24 July 2009). This WHO announcement triggered contracts with half-a-dozen major pharmaceutical companies to manufacture a vaccine for which they were paid about $40 billion by the taxpayers.
Most of these vaccines were destroyed because the H1N1 pandemic also failed to materialize (144 deaths worldwide after 11 weeks, way less than the annual flu mortalities), although 60 million (mostly children) received GlaxoSmithKline's Pandemrix and hundreds of them ended up brain damaged.
Wolfgang Wodarg, chairman of the health committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe declared it a "false pandemic" and "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century." The British Medical Journal stated that "The WHO's credibility has been badly damaged" in its handling of the swine flu pandemic, marred by secrecy and conflict of interest with drug companies-referring to the WHO's 2004 guidelines and at least one expert on the secret "emergency committee" advising the WHO on declaring the 2009 pandemic having received payment from GSK that year.
After the pandemic failed to appear, the WHO redefined (and then denied having done so) a pandemic could be declared even if no deaths occurred;
6. 2020, Covid-19: More of the same, as covered earlier.
In September, the WHO held the Global Vaccination Summit that established a plan, 10 Actions towards Vaccination for All,to manipulate citizens into vaccine compliance. In October, Event 201 was held and in November of 2019 their call to action was issued at the same time that first Covid-19 case appeared in Wuhan.
WHO has tried a PR and grassroots campaign to overcome the misgivings citizens now hold toward vaccines, which is replete with false information - which makes YouTube's policy of removing any information that contradicts WHO particularly illogical and unjust, but certainly coordinated.
This whole pandemic was predicted in the 2010 report by the Rockefeller Foundation, Scenarios for the Future, of a virulent pandemic closing down the world economies and citizens gladly agreeing to lockdowns, face masks, temperature checks, lauding the authoritarian Chinese approach, with loss of sovereignty, privacy, and rights in exchange for their own "safety."
The amount of effort and finances being expended to bring about mandatory vaccinations shows it to be central to the greater agenda; the level of destruction considered acceptable to forward the agenda shows a deadly serious intent that can only be countered by individuals and organizations thinking for themselves, valuing their liberties and lifestyles, and being brave enough to fight back. If we are to preempt the next onslaught, we need to disempower these special-interest groups and individuals, as they represent only about 7% of the world-and that will take a large number of citizens becoming active.
We may have some hotels and resorts starting to come back to life for now, our lives creeping back incrementally, but if we do not take some action, however small, to improve the management of this civilization, we will return soon to a Dark Age simply because high-tech, materialistic, social-control societies cannot do otherwise than blow themselves up for lack of any humanity or spiritual guiding force. The result of such a techno-society is unwilling participants in a slave culture and nobody left who cares. It is doomed to fail ultimately for one and all.
For those who believe this virus to be a lethal calamity and the end of the world is at hand, remember President Roosevelt's inaugural address in 1933: "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself."
"Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine, Defiance
It is evil people who make life seem hostile. Left to their own devices, the vast majority of us get along just fine, seek the truth that will improve conditions, act with a good dose of common sense-all while enjoying life.
"Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine, Defiance
It is evil people who make life seem hostile. Left to their own devices, the vast majority of us get along just fine, seek the truth that will improve conditions, act with a good dose of common sense-all while enjoying life.
So how do we end the prospect of continued lockdowns, loss of livelihood, and forced vaccines, as the media and some government bodies keep threatening? As a majority, by launching a tsunami of public indignation and demanding sensible and effective management from our elected officials regarding this pandemic that seems primarily to have been designed to bring about forced vaccinations worldwide and to build on the 9/11 security measures to gain greater control over citizenry.
"No one rules if no one obeys." - David Icke
Neutralize the Next Wave of Fear Mongering
Review A, B, C, D & E below that apply any time the media blasts fear over the airwaves about Covid-19:
The current message is and will continue to be that the number of cases is going through the roof requiring another lockdown - while neglecting to mention:
A) More testing is being done, so of course more people would test positive;
B) The PCR test is being used even though it is completely unreliable for testing viruses, giving many false positives because it cannot differentiate between Covid-19 or other germs;
C) The positive diagnosis is based only on observation of symptoms (flu-like symptoms, shortness of breath); that could be the result of multiple causes;
D) The vast majority of those "cases" have no symptoms;
E) The vast majority of those "cases" are not contagious.
The media is simply trying to alarm everyone by calling out those who test positive, even when based on an incorrect diagnosis, as "infected," even if they have no symptoms and are not infectious, and as "cases," a word that means a person becomes ill with what is confirmed to be Covid-19. Thus they make it seem a second wave is coming when it is not and panic State authorities, desperate to open up their economies, into another deleterious shutdown.
For instance, the CDC saying antibody information collected shows the number of "confirmed cases" (meaning testing positive) is probably 10x more than earlier published figures, demonstrates that the media and related government agencies are twisting good news into bad news. Why? Because the more people who test positive, the lower the ultimate death rate and danger presented by Covid-19. In fact, the death rate never went exponential, indicating, as one study shows, that people have a resistance to Covid-19; another study showed that the T-cells of 40-60% of people who had not been exposed to Covid-19 are able to deal with it based on their ability to deal with the common cold.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the number of Covid-19 deaths was 75% lower in states that did not lock down, but the media ignores deaths and focuses on the only number that can be made to appear bad: The number of positive tests that they pretend are accurate and are increasing as more people are tested, which they then escalate into "infections" and "cases."
The WSJ article began with a statement that betrays the true nature of the media: "GOP governors have faced enormous media pressure to lock down their states in solidarity with Democrats..." The media are meant to report news, so what is this "pressure" other than propaganda - applying relentless pressure to make people think a certain way for political or other ends? A good reason to disconnect from them and seek responsible reporting that unearths facts because it respects the right and ability of individuals to think for themselves.
More examples of the early-to-open States being targeted by the media for panic generation: 71% of South Carolina hospital beds were reported to be in use already as COVID cases keep increasing, yet normal occupancy is 69%-70%. Comparing Covid cases/deaths in the Bronx (3,346/234) with Houston (567/7) makes it obvious that Houston's population of 7.1 million is doing a lot better than the Bronx's 1.5 million.
And to top it off, the new definition of cases includes anyone who has had some contact with anyone who later tests positive. No tests on them even, just quarantine and counted as a case-which explains the sudden surge in cases at the end of June that is being used to push for a shutdown until a vaccine can be brought to market.
No doubt the threat of wars, riots, destruction, political shouting matches, and Covid-19 alarm will jockey for the lead position on the airwaves until a vaccine finally appears; and when it does, don't be so knocked about that you forget to dig through the trials to see what they really showed, because the media will only publish the glowing PR and skip over the adverse reactions.
Review A, B, C, D & E below that apply any time the media blasts fear over the airwaves about Covid-19:
The current message is and will continue to be that the number of cases is going through the roof requiring another lockdown - while neglecting to mention:
A) More testing is being done, so of course more people would test positive;
B) The PCR test is being used even though it is completely unreliable for testing viruses, giving many false positives because it cannot differentiate between Covid-19 or other germs;
C) The positive diagnosis is based only on observation of symptoms (flu-like symptoms, shortness of breath); that could be the result of multiple causes;
D) The vast majority of those "cases" have no symptoms;
E) The vast majority of those "cases" are not contagious.
The media is simply trying to alarm everyone by calling out those who test positive, even when based on an incorrect diagnosis, as "infected," even if they have no symptoms and are not infectious, and as "cases," a word that means a person becomes ill with what is confirmed to be Covid-19. Thus they make it seem a second wave is coming when it is not and panic State authorities, desperate to open up their economies, into another deleterious shutdown.
For instance, the CDC saying antibody information collected shows the number of "confirmed cases" (meaning testing positive) is probably 10x more than earlier published figures, demonstrates that the media and related government agencies are twisting good news into bad news. Why? Because the more people who test positive, the lower the ultimate death rate and danger presented by Covid-19. In fact, the death rate never went exponential, indicating, as one study shows, that people have a resistance to Covid-19; another study showed that the T-cells of 40-60% of people who had not been exposed to Covid-19 are able to deal with it based on their ability to deal with the common cold.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the number of Covid-19 deaths was 75% lower in states that did not lock down, but the media ignores deaths and focuses on the only number that can be made to appear bad: The number of positive tests that they pretend are accurate and are increasing as more people are tested, which they then escalate into "infections" and "cases."
The WSJ article began with a statement that betrays the true nature of the media: "GOP governors have faced enormous media pressure to lock down their states in solidarity with Democrats..." The media are meant to report news, so what is this "pressure" other than propaganda - applying relentless pressure to make people think a certain way for political or other ends? A good reason to disconnect from them and seek responsible reporting that unearths facts because it respects the right and ability of individuals to think for themselves.
More examples of the early-to-open States being targeted by the media for panic generation: 71% of South Carolina hospital beds were reported to be in use already as COVID cases keep increasing, yet normal occupancy is 69%-70%. Comparing Covid cases/deaths in the Bronx (3,346/234) with Houston (567/7) makes it obvious that Houston's population of 7.1 million is doing a lot better than the Bronx's 1.5 million.
And to top it off, the new definition of cases includes anyone who has had some contact with anyone who later tests positive. No tests on them even, just quarantine and counted as a case-which explains the sudden surge in cases at the end of June that is being used to push for a shutdown until a vaccine can be brought to market.
No doubt the threat of wars, riots, destruction, political shouting matches, and Covid-19 alarm will jockey for the lead position on the airwaves until a vaccine finally appears; and when it does, don't be so knocked about that you forget to dig through the trials to see what they really showed, because the media will only publish the glowing PR and skip over the adverse reactions.
Likewise, don't close your eyes to the illogical contact tracing and enforcement of self-quarantining for 14 days just because a person has been exposed to someone who has tested positive for Covid-19. Apart from the personal injustice and unnecessary imprisonment - as a positive test means little-to-nothing - it will make it impossible for businesses to stay open if every time one person tests positive (usually without symptoms), the entire business has to quarantine for two weeks. Two weeks later, another round of testing shows one person testing positive and the business closes again.
Before this irrational program is implemented is the time to be alert to the irrationalities and to point them out to those who can reverse them and adopt a sensible strategy: Taking precautions for those individuals at risk; and at work, if someone is actually ill, they simply call in sick and stay home until they are better while everyone else is free to continue working. Managing this normal-level outbreak, as with the annual flu, does not require governmental intervention nor enforced medical lockdowns and treatments.
Before this irrational program is implemented is the time to be alert to the irrationalities and to point them out to those who can reverse them and adopt a sensible strategy: Taking precautions for those individuals at risk; and at work, if someone is actually ill, they simply call in sick and stay home until they are better while everyone else is free to continue working. Managing this normal-level outbreak, as with the annual flu, does not require governmental intervention nor enforced medical lockdowns and treatments.
No comments:
Post a Comment