Saturday, August 22, 2020

The Biblical Necessity Of The Pretribulation Rapture




THE BIBLICAL NECESSITY OF THE PRETRIBULATION RAPTURE
Jonathan Brentner




The events of 2020 have caused some dear saints to think that the tribulation has already started. Others wonder about the certainty of the pretribulation rapture as they watch violence, wickedness, and lawlessness overshadow our world.
My purpose in writing is to encourage believers to remain watchful as signs of the approaching tribulation multiply seemingly by the day. Despite what we see, we can know Jesus will come for us before the start of the seven-year tribulation. We can trust the words of Scripture as chaos becomes the norm rather than the exception in our world. Jesus is coming for His bride, the church, before the start of the tribulation.
J. D. Farag, in his August 9 prophecy update, did an excellent job of providing sound biblical proof in support of the pretribulation rapture. If you have not yet watched it, I encourage you to do so. After viewing it, I felt a desire to share a summary of why I remain confident of Jesus’ imminent appearing. While my approach differs from that of J. D. Farag, they both confirm the biblical necessity of the pretribulation rapture.
We can be certain of this because:

1. PREMILLENNIALISM IS A BIBLICAL CERTAINTY

Premillennialism, which is foundational to a belief in the pretribulation rapture, is a biblical certainty. Those who deny the reality of a literal millennium with a restored Israel, the amillennialists, relegate the tribulation to allegory. If there is no literal tribulation, then determining the placement of the rapture in regard to it becomes a moot point. If the book of Revelation represents symbolism or past history as many claim, then there’s no wrath to miss with a pretribulation rapture.
With the premillennial understanding that the tribulation is literal, and it is, I will proceed to make a scriptural case for placing the rapture ahead of this coming time of wrath on the earth.

2. THE RAPTURE CANNOT HAPPEN AT THE SAME TIME AS THE SECOND COMING

The biblical descriptions of the rapture and second coming contain many significant differences that make it impossible for one to reconcile the two into one event. They cannot happen at the same time. This is an essential first step in placing the rapture ahead of the tribulation.
The resurrection of those who have died in Christ confirms this distinction. The resurrection of the dead happens first in the event Paul describes in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17 and 1 Corinthians 15:50-54. With the second coming, however, the resurrection of tribulation saints does not occur until after a lengthy sequence of events (see Rev. 19:11-20:4), it may not even occur until a day or two after Jesus’ return to earth.
This is just one of many distinguishing differences that exist in the passages describing the rapture versus those referring to the second coming. If the words of Scripture matter, and they do, we cannot combine these two events into one occurrence; it’s impossible.

3. THE NEW TESTAMENT SENSE OF IMMINENCY

The sense of imminency in the New Testament regarding Jesus’ appearing further establishes the rapture as a unique event. The apostles repeatedly described their readers as eagerly anticipating Jesus’ return for them (1 Cor. 1:7; Phil. 3:20-21; 1 Thess. 1:8-10; Titus 2:11-13; James 5:8; 1 Peter 1:13). New Testament saints watched for the rapture as though it could occur at any moment.
As for the second coming, Jesus told us that at least two major events would happen before it. In Matthew 24:15-29, He says that the defilement of the temple by the antichrist and the “great tribulation” that follows it will happen before He returns to earth. According to the Lord’s own words, significant events that have not yet happened must occur before the second coming.
Do you see how this expectation differs greatly from that of the New Testament saints who prayed for Jesus to return soon (Maranatha). In his early letters, Paul even expressed the anticipation he would be alive at the time of Jesus’ appearing.
Only a pretribulation rapture fits as the eager anticipation of Jesus’ appearing that we see throughout the New Testament. Such an expectation does not fit with the second coming because it cannot happen until after the antichrist defiles the temple in the middle of the tribulation followed by a time of intense tribulation on the earth.

4. THE EXPECTATION OF THE THESSALONIANS

The expectation of the Thessalonians supports the imminent appearing of Jesus as well as the placement of the rapture before the tribulation. The new converts in Thessalonica grieved when some of their members died. Paul’s response reveals the source of their unnecessary grief; they thought that the dead in Christ would miss out on the joy of the rapture.
How could they have thought this way apart from expecting Jesus’ appearing to happen at any moment? They, like the apostle Paul, believed Jesus could return for them in their lifetime. In order to have such an expectation, it’s necessary for the rapture to at least happen early in the tribulation if not before it.

5. THE SURPRISE BEGINNING OF THE DAY OF THE LORD

In 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3, Paul tells his readers that the start of the day of the Lord will surprise people on the earth “like a thief in the night” with its “sudden destruction” from which “they will not escape.” The day of Lord, a primarily Old Testament term, refers to an extended time of the Lord’s wrath on the earth leading up to and including Jesus’ return to the earth.
If the day of the Lord were to begin at any time after the seal judgments of Revelation 6 commence, this day could not catch anyone by surprise. No one will be saying “peace and security” (v. 3) after the pestilences, famines, pandemics, and wars of the seal judgments kill one-fourth of the earth’s population, perhaps more than two billion people.
In 1 Thessalonians 5:9, the apostles assures his readers, and us, that we will not experience this time of God’s judgment upon the earth known as the day of the Lord, “For God has not destined us for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.” Since the seal judgments are a part of God’ wrath, the Lord must come for us before they begin.
If the rapture must happen before the seal judgments of Revelation 6, then it must certainly occur before the start of the tribulation.

6. THE PANIC OF THE THESSALONIANS

Did the Thessalonians understand Paul’s promise to mean they would miss all of the day of the Lord? Yes, their response to the errant message stating the day of the Lord had already begun confirms this; it caused so much fear that these new converts visibly shook with fear at the thought (2 Thess. 2:2).
Why would they panic at hearing such news if they expected to be on earth during the day of the Lord or even for a part of it? Their response to the false report tells us they regarded Paul’s promise in 1 Thessalonians 5:9 as one of deliverance from all of God’s wrath during the day of the Lord, which includes all of the tribulation.
The panic of the Thessalonians confirms they expected to miss all of the tribulation. They expected the rapture to happen first.

7. THE “DEPARTURE” OF 2 THESSALONIANS 2:3 DENOTES THE RAPTURE

In 2 Thessalonians 2:3 Paul wrote, “Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction.” The Greek word apostasia, here translated “rebellion,” literally means departure. The context alone determines whether it refers to a physical parting, such as the rapture, or a spiritual apostasy, which is common understanding for 2 Thessalonians 2:3.
The context supports the idea of a physical departure over that of leaving the faith. The definite article in the Greek tells us that apostle has a definite event in mind, one that the Thessalonians would recognize without further explanation. We have no evidence that Paul talked to the Thessalonians about a future apostasy of the church. He did not write about the church’s departure from the faith in the last days until much later in his ministry when he wrote 1 and 2 Timothy.
On the other hand, both his books to the Thessalonians refer often to the rapture; that’s a departure they would have readily recognized apart from a word of clarification.
Cyprian, who lived AD 200-258, referred to the rapture as a “departure.” In his book Treatises of Cyprian, he wrote, “Do you not give God thanks, do you not congratulate yourself, that by an early departure you are taken away, and delivered from the shipwrecks and disasters that are imminent?” This leader in the early church confirms both the imminency of Jesus’ appearing and he uses the word “departure” to describe the rapture.
If the departure of 2 Thessalonians 2:3 denotes the rapture, and the evidence strongly suggest that it does, then the rapture must happen before the start of the tribulation.

8. THE UNVEILING OF THE ANTICHRIST TO THE WORLD

In Paul’s response to the fright of the Thessalonians saints, Paul tells them that the day of the Lord has not yet come because the Restrainer continues to hold back the unveiling of the antichrist (2 Thess. 2:3-8). If the Restrainer is the Holy Spirit, and this interpretation fits best with the context, this confirms that the church cannot be on earth when the antichrist steps to the forefront among the world’s leaders.

9. JESUS’ PROMISE TO THE CHURCH AT PHILADELPHIA

We have additional verification of the pretribulation rapture in Jesus’ promise to the church at Philadelphia, “Because you have kept my word about patient endurance, I will keep you from the hour of trial that is coming on the whole world, to try those who dwell on the earth” (Rev. 3:10). This “hour of trial” does not refer to a time of persecution that would come upon a particular church or even all believers, but rather points to a time of suffering that will impact all the people of the world, which fits with tribulation John describes in Revelation 6-18.
The fact that this testing is specifically for “those who dwell on the earth” (Rev. 3:10) further confirms its reference to the judgments on earth known as the tribulation. John uses this phrase eight other times in the book of Revelation (6:10; 8:13; 11:10; 13:8 12, 14; 14:6; and 17:8). In each instance it either refers to either people impacted by the tribulation or those refusing to repent of their sins during this time.
Jesus’ words that immediately follow this promise indicate how he will keep us out of it, “I am coming quickly” (Rev. 3:11). Since neither the “hour of trial” and Jesus’ return have occurred, both must remain future. The rapture must occur before this future time of wrath begins.

10. THE CHURCH IS IN HEAVEN BEFORE THE TRIBULATION BEGINS

If we are not on earth during the tribulation or the “hour of trial,” we must be in heaven with Jesus. We see a clear indication of this with the twenty-four elders who appear in heaven seated on thrones (Rev. 4-5). John’s description of them fits with promises made to New Testament saints rather than angels. The term elder denotes an aging process, that eliminates any identification of them as angels.
If these elders represent the church, and no other identification fits with John’s description of them, this places all believers in heaven before the seal judgments of Revelation 6 begin.

11. GALILEAN WEDDING TRADITIONS

In his prophecy update, J. D. Farag did a wonderful job of describing how the Jewish wedding customs of the first century AD confirm a pretribulation rapture. Recent archeological findings, as dramatized in the movie Before the wrath, show how the Galilean wedding traditions provide further validation of a pretribulation rapture.
These traditions also help us understand the joy we will experience when Jesus comes to takes us to His Father’s house in heaven (John 14:2-3). The rapture may seem like a frightening event until we understand it represents Jesus coming for His beloved bride. It’s all a part His love story for us, the redeemed.
I believe these customs help us understand the grief of the Thessalonians that Paul addressed in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18. If Paul, while in Thessalonica, had described the rapture in terms of a Jewish wedding based upon Jesus’ words in the Upper Room, it explains why they looked forward to it with such eager anticipation (1:8-10). It may also help us understand their grief when some of their members died since only living people celebrate weddings. The Thessalonians did not doubt the future resurrection of their departed loved ones, they thought they would miss the joy of Jesus returning for His bride.
In response to their sorrow, the apostle emphasized the primary place of the “dead in Christ” at the time of the rapture, which at this early time in the life of the church may have been new revelation (see v. 15).

12. THE TESTIMONY OF CHURCH HISTORY

Church history does not prove any doctrinal belief, only Scripture can do that.
However, history negates the often-repeated argument that no one believed in a pretribulation rapture until the mid to late 1800’s. Testimony from the early church confirms that several church fathers separated the rapture from the second coming with an unspecified period of tribulation in-between the two events.
John Darby was not first person to assert a belief in the pretribulation rapture. Ephraim the Syrian, who lived during the fourth century AD, preached a sermon in which he proclaimed a clear and unmistakable belief in a pretribulation rapture.

GOD HAS NOT DESTINED US FOR WRATH

Jesus is coming for His church, for us, before the start of the day of the Lord; that is the promise of 1 Thessalonians 5:9, “For God has not destined us for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.” This wrath belongs to the day of Lord under whose timeframe belongs the entire coming seven-year tribulation.
The church cannot be on the earth during the seal judgments that result in the deaths of one-fourth of the world’s population at the time. This is the wrath of which the Lord, through the apostle Paul, promises us we will miss.
Jesus is coming for us before the start of the seven-year tribulation.

15 comments:

NatureHacker said...

This hubris will be judged harshly. There is no certainty of either a pre-trib or post-trib rapture. However those who emphatically preach the only possibility as pre-trib, fail to prepare the bride what may in fact happen - that she may have to go through the tribulation. Failure to prepare the bride for this possibility, and if and when it does happen, will lead to harsh judgement of these teachers and preachers. The best option is to prepare the bride for a possible tribulation and make sure everyone's oil jar is full.

Godspeed.

NatureHacker said...

This hubris will be judged harshly. There is no certainty of either a pre-trib or post-trib rapture. However those who emphatically preach the only possibility as pre-trib, fail to prepare the bride what may in fact happen - that she may have to go through the tribulation. Failure to prepare the bride for this possibility, and if and when it does happen, will lead to harsh judgement of these teachers and preachers. The best option is to prepare the bride for a possible tribulation and make sure everyone's oil jar is full.

Godspeed.

Scott said...

Show me the scriptures that reveal to the Bride how to prepare for the Tribulation
Show me scriptures that describe the bride as being in the Tribulation
If The Jesus took the Wrath of God for believers - why would believers have to face God's wrath during the tribulation?
What do you think 1 These 1:10 means?
What do you think Rev 3:12 means?
If the Church is here during the Trib, why are the two witnesses necessary and the 144k?

This is just for starters - I have many more. You "Tribulation warriors" kill me every time....Usually twist ONE scripture and make a case on that while ignoring the avalanche of other scriptures....And that old argument that people won't be prepared is really getting old, Ive been hearing it for 30 years....Get some new material - such as the scriptures rather than some vague notion

Also the church wasn't here for the first 483 years of the 490, but you think it should be here for part or all of the last 7? On what basis/

When Daniel was old that these 490 years was meant for Him and His people (Daniel 9) what does that mean to you?

Unknown said...

I have come to actually doubt the salvation of any person who attacks the CLEAR teaching of Jesus and the Apostles and tries to deny the blessed hope the Lord has given us believers. Where is their faith in the Lord's Word? It is denial of one of the great and precious promises. Their home is still this world and perhaps those who deny this simple and clear doctrine(precious), are the earth dwellers described in Both Testaments.Amen!

Cindy said...

I agree with you NaturelHacker....Jesus Himself said "after the tribulation of those days" Mt 24:29 Those who follow Jesus words will be prepared...it is only His words that will not pass away.
Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.

Ed B. said...

The first four hundred years were years of great glory for the church founded on the blood of martyrs !!!

Scott said...

I'm not sure I'd agree with the pack of preparation with pre-trib believers - most of these folks are more prepared than anyone in the other camps...I assume, as many do, that we could face hardships on this side of the gathering up. I am well prepared for the trip if I were to be here. So I'm not sure what kind of argument that is. I also notice that no post or mid tribber ever answers these basic questions - they always get ignored. Always....The topic shifts to other things or the 1-2 scriptures that get twisted to attempt to make the case..Every. single. time. And again, in the most fundamental sense - if Jesus took God's wrath on our behalf - why would we have to have to face God's wrath on an unrepentant world, when Jesus did that...And why would that generation of believes be the only one in > 2000 years to have to face God's wrath? Did they do something wrong? Either Jesus took this on the cross or he didn't . Period.. Its binary and it can't be both.
It would deny the very basics of salvation through Jesus

Nightlight rider said...

When is the last trump. 1 Cor, 15:52

Scott said...

Thats not the last trump of the Tribulation. There is no such reference to the trumpet call in that passage an the trumpet judgements - there are many references to trumpets - one being the trumpet blasts that would signal departure from encampments during the 40 years of exile. The last trump being a reference to the final noice of departure (after the preparations made at earlier trumpet calls)...The verse in Thessalonians is the better reference to that passage you cite in 1 For 15. These are the parallel passages - and the trumpet CALL not a signal for judgement...

Plus - that one questionable scripture would negate all the other references, scriptures, parallels, that point to a pretrib rapture. Look at Jonathan's article - all the articles by Jack K, the fact that the church us not seen in Rev 6-18 and is seen at the time of the second coming after the bema judgement etc...The scriptures that state we will not be here for the hour of trial, 1 These 1:10, 1 Rev 4:1 when John ascends to heaven in a manner exactly like the rapture after the church age concludes and before the Tribulation begins. is that coincidence? And the verse starts with "After this...." ie, after the church age has drawn to a close? Then he sees representation of the Church in the 24 elders, and the lamp stand? Then the Church isn't seen again until the second coming? All that is ignored due to the above "last trump" argument? I don't understand that, I honestly don't. There is so much evidence that the "Trumpet call" has absolutely nothing to do with the trumpet judgements of revelation. Anyway, thats my 2 cents

Scott said...

By the way, I'll add, I haven't had these discussions for a few years as they seem to go nowhere and we'll know soon enough anyway. For me, its always been the "preponderance of evidence". I've never seen solid arguments that can dispute the basic questions I ask - and I would think anyone who believes in mid-trip, pre-wrath, post-trip would want to be able to answer those questions...

Anonymous said...

The seal and trumpet judgements are judgements, not wrath. There is a huge difference. The bowls/vials of wrath are wrath. That seems pretty plain. Based on that- just because we will not experience God's wrath does not mean that we will not be here on earth. The Israelites were in Egypt for the plagues but many of the plagues only affected the Egyptians. Peter states in 1 Peter 4:17 that it is time for judgement to begin with the house of the Lord... Jesus said that all who live godly lives will experience persecution. The judgements are the result of spiritual forces of darkness released on the earth- very different from the direct wrath of God.
This period is referred to as the trying of the saints. Revelation states that the Antichrist is given authority to wage war against the saints and to overcome them. Who will he be warring against and overcoming if the church has been raptured?
Regardless of when the rapture will happen we should be prepared- parable of the trustworthy servant, and parable of the ten virgins among many other scriptures throughout the new testament.

Anonymous said...

Many of the questions and arguments for the pre-tribulation rapture seem to me to be build on suppositions and uncertainties... I could well be wrong- honestly I would very much like to believe in a pre-trib rapture, but Matthew 24:29-31 pretty well settles it for me.

In verse 29 Jesus says immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened... (A clear reference to the 6th seal, rev. 6:12)

Then in verse 31 He says that He will send forth His angels from the four winds to gather together his elect... Who are the elect if not the church?

Also 2 thes 2:1 Paul refers to the 2nd coming of the Lord and our gathering together to him in a way that sounds like it is the same event, which would line up what Jesus says in Matthew 24.

As to the verse about "he who restrains the man of lawlessness"- we do not know who that is. Could be the Holy Spirit, or maybe not. Also the fact the he is "taken out of the way" does not mean that he is completely removed from the earth.
I have heard many people use that verse to support the idea of a pre-trib rapture. And yes- if those suppositions are true then the conclusion would stand to reason, but if we remove the suppositions the reasoning collapses.

I know that there are more things that I do not understand than those that I do, but in my studies and experience a pre-trib rapture looks like a convenient theology that is inconsistent with the many themes throughout the old and new testaments.

We also know that there will be a great deception and a time of tribulation like the world has never seen. The love of many will grow cold, brother will betray brother unto death. We will be hated by all nations for His name's sake, delivered up to be killed and that he who endures to the end shall be saved...

Scott said...

Again, as Ive said so many times before - you are taking one verse (incorrectly) and building the entire case around it while ignoring everything else thats been stated in this thread alone. If you don't want to believe in a pretrib rapture, wouldn't it make sense to need to address all of the issues stated here?

As far as Matt 24 Jesus WAS talking about the tribulation - Jesus went through all of the birth pain signs, and clearly He also went through the Tribulation, we know this because He referenced the Abomination of Desolation which happens in the mid-point of the Trib. He gathers the elect at the end of the Trib at the time of the second coming so the sheer and the goats can be separated - that has nothing to do with the gathering up with the Church and wasn't intended to.

Again, what about the other mountain of evidence of the pre-trib rapture - why is that all ignored?

Scott said...

Ohm the elect in this case are the tribulation saints - again, this occurs at the end of the Tribulation. Many will come to Christ during the trip - they will populate the 1000 year reign of Christ on earth. This verse is never interpreted as a rapture reference

Scott said...

SO you see a difference in the seal/trumpet judgements vs the bowl judgements? SMH....Seriously?

And have you read Rev 3:10? We will be kept from "the HOUR of trial" - ie we won't be here at all.

Waging war against the believers who come to Christ during the Tribulation =- aka Tribulation saints - that is clearly not the Church.

Again, the MOUNTAIN of evidence for the pre-trib gets completely ignored while the focus is typically 1-2 scriptures taken out of context while everything else gets ignored.

Well, I haven't done this in a while and the "arguments" remain the same....Frankly to me, this gets boring because its the same circular reasoning/arguments.

No one from the post-trip/ mid-trip group will address all of the points made by me and in the posted article. Its bizarre and frustrating. No one - (as I predicted) will take the time or effort to dissect all of the arguments for pre-trib view and for me, academically, that becomes a waste of time and over the years tedious and boring. There is just nothing stimulating or interesting in these old tired and inaccurate view....Unless someone comes back and decides to dissect all off the arguments/scriptures posted which confirm the pre-trib view (my points above and the article attached) - I'm pretty much done with this (plus I don't have time, this is taking away from the news watch etc.