Bill Gates is regretting things left undone. Gates is sorry he hasn’t done “more to call attention to the danger” of a pandemic.” In an interview, Gates said, “I feel terrible. The whole point of talking about it was that we could take action and minimize the damage.”
For his critics, rather than minimizing the damage, Gates has done too much to set a course of action having disastrous unanticipated consequences. Gates, the billionaire philanthropist, has become a supervillain.
Since April, over 500,000 people have signed a petition at whitehouse.gov calling for an investigation of the Gates Foundation for “medical malpractice and crimes against humanity.”
Admirers of Gates blame “anti-vaccine activists and conspiracy-minded posters” for spreading “misinformation” damaging to Bill Gates’s reputation. In May, one essay claimed to debunk the assertion that Gates plans to make South Africans early test subjects for a COVID-19 vaccine. A month later, the “myth” was revealed to be true.
Gates has taken up the cause of global warming too. He isfunding a mad geoengineering scheme at Harvard to partially block sunlight. Imagine setting in motion a “solution” that has the potential to destroy all life on earth. Gates’s hubris seems boundless.
You don’t need a conspiracy theory to explain Bill Gates’s transformation from entrepreneur to supervillain. Gates has always been a ruthless zealot. Yet when he was at Microsoft, his worst character flaws were held in check by the demands of running a competitive business and the necessity of meeting the needs of consumers. As a philanthropist, he is not disciplined by forces of the marketplace. Empowered by government coercion, there is nothing to keep him or us from his worst instincts.
Gates is ready to give away most of his vast fortune, in his words, to “coordinated global action” to prevent disease. You might give Gates high marks for his good intentions.
History is full of reasons why we should not trust those with good intentions. A common trope in movies and comics is the supervillain who is ready to sacrifice the well-being of many people to further a warped pursuit they see as noble.
In his book Capitalism and Freedom, Milton Friedman explained why “concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it.” Friedman pointed to internal threats to freedom that are far more difficult to see than external threats:
“It is the internal threat coming from men of good intentions and good will who wish to reform us. Impatient with the slowness of persuasion and example to achieve the great social changes they envision, they are anxious to use the power of the state to achieve their ends and confident of their own ability to do so.”
When Gates the entrepreneur was wrong, he was held accountable by consumers and competitive forces. When Gates the philanthropist is wrong, politicians and academics will evaluate him by different criteria.
Neil Ferguson of the Imperial College London had inordinate influence “advising national governments on pathogen outbreaks.” Ferguson listens to Gates, as his center receives “tens of millions of dollars in annual funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.”
The model Ferguson used to advise draconian lockdowns in response to COVID-19 has been thoroughly discredited both on theoretical and empirical grounds. To err is to be human, but this was not Ferguson’s first disastrous prediction. As AIER president Edward Peter Stringham points out, “Ferguson rose to fame in 2005 when he predicted that up to 200 million people could be killed from the bird flu.” The actual number of deaths was 50.
Gates, the businessman, would have long ago cut off Ferguson. No successful entrepreneur insists on partnering with a dismal failure. Yet for Gates, Ferguson’s performance as an epidemiologist didn’t seem to matter. What matters to Gates is that Ferguson’s view of the world is aligned with his own. Both support quarantining healthy people without regard to the human and economic cost.
Bill Gates has enjoyed a partnership with Dr. Anthony Fauci. Of course, it is natural to partner with those who share your worldview. Problems arise when a partnership leads to the use of the coercive arm of government to implement what you believe is your superior vision.
Four months before SARS-CoV-2 began infecting the people of China; Bill Gates was busy negotiating a $100 billion contact tracing program to be implemented by governments and forced on all Americans. On the week of August 12th to 19th, the Gates Foundation met privately with U.S. Congressman Bobby L. Rush (D-IL) in Rwanda, East Africa. The week-long event was underwritten by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
At the meeting, they discussed the rollout of wide scale contact tracing and negotiated which companies would get to cash in on the plan. They discussed how to contact trace all Americans, how to force them to submit to medical tests and accept vaccination passports in order to go about their lives. (Related: Airline industry pushing for medical testing, thermal screening, digital IDs and vaccination passports.)
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were preparing to test, track, trace, mask, isolate and corner Americans into forced vaccinations four months before SARS-CoV-2 arrived in China and six months before Bill Gate’s friends at the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a worldwide “pandemic.”
Bill Gates is the number one funder of WHO and has been parading media outlets calling for government surveillance of human movement and the need for elaborate contact tracing programs to enforce it. Among these tracing efforts, Bill Gates wants to enforce medical requirements and a “new normal” medical police state, complete with temperature checks that serve as a foothold into forced medical testing and isolation orders. This “new normal” also includes monitoring where people travel and who they interact with, while forcing their contacts into isolation. It all leads to the rollout of vaccination passports that will serve as permission slips for people to gather, meet, travel, and interact. Corporations will be incentivized to participate or be threatened with litigation if they do not go along with a “safe, new normal.”
These shocking revelations were revealed on the Thomas Paine podcast by John Moynihan and Larry Doyle — two undercover investigators who testified in Congress in 2018 about the $2.5 billion tax evasion and fraud schemes employed by the Clintons. Now the investigators are sounding the alarm — how Bill Gates planned to contact trace Americans long before a pandemic was ever declared.
Now, just nine months after the Gates Foundation met with democratic congressman Bobby Rush, there is a bill introduced in the Congress called H.R. 6666, the COVID-19 Testing, Reaching and Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act. The $100 billion bill was introduced by none other than Bobby L. Rush himself. The TRACE act gives the CDC absolute power over the country and people’s lives, making nasal probes, surveillance tracking, and isolation orders, among other obscene medical edicts, a requirement into the future
It should be noted that Congressman Rush is from Illinois, a state that is under strict controls put in place from Governor J.B Pritzker. This governor has a financial stake in covid-19 testing companies. This governor also has family connections to Microsoft and Bill Gates and has echoed Bill Gates by saying that the state will not be able to fully open until a vaccine or pharmaceutical is ready to be deployed. The medical coercion in Illinois is very real; Illinois is currently a concentration camp, where citizens, restricted of their liberties, are being conditioned to accept a “new normal” in order to prepare for tracking, tracing, medical requirements everywhere they go, which will likely include coerced, experimental injections by year’s end.
Sources include:
No comments:
Post a Comment