Friday, June 1, 2012

And This Time, We REALLY Mean It!

This has become so redundant it is actually comical at this point:

US Secretary of State Hillary Clintonindicated Friday that Iran would need to prove its intentions to take steps to address international concerns over its nuclear program by the end of this month."We are looking for concrete actions and we will know by the next meeting in Moscow in just a few weeks whether Iran is prepared to take such actions," Clinton told reporters while on a trip to Norway.

The US has in the past said it, too, doesn't want to see talks for the sake of talks that only give Iran more opportunity for its enrichment program, but has seen more time at play than Israel and has agreed to three rounds of talks spaced out over several weeks.

Caroline Glick gives us some much needed commentary on this very topic, and this article is worth reading in full:

The Obama administration insists on clinging to the fantasy that it can convince the Iranians to give up their nuclear weapons program.

After all, when Barak was premier, he oversaw Israel’s unilateral surrender of south Lebanon in 2000. Barak promised that by giving Hezbollah south Lebanon, Israel would force the Iranian proxy army to disarm and behave like a Western political party.


Then of course, there is the Gaza precedent.

Ignoring the lesson of Lebanon, Barak’s successor Ariel Sharon reenacted his unilateral surrender policy in Gaza in 2005. Like Barak, Sharon promised that once Gaza was cleared of all Jewish presence, it would magically transform itself into a Middle Eastern version of Singapore.


Both Barak and Sharon promised that their unilateral surrender policies would do more than merely transform Hezbollah and Hamas into liberal democrats. They said that by cutting and running, Israel would earn the love of theinternational community, and winning the love of the likes of Washington and Brussels, they said, was the most urgent item on Israel’s agenda.

So yes, Hezbollah has taken over not just south Lebanon, but all of Lebanon. And true, there is no one in the Palestinian Authority today who is willing to accept the continued existence of Israel in any borders. But that just means we need the West to love us even more. And the only way to get the West to love us is by imperiling our very existence by handing our heartland over to people who wish to destroy our country.

Now she turns to the U.S.:

Unfortunately, the situation is not pretty. US President Barack Obama’s policies are just as irrational as the ones that Barak is urging Israel to implement in order to win Obama’s support. And Obama’s rationales for adopting these policies are just as divorced from reality as Barak’s are.

...under Obama, US policy towards Iran is based on the view “that at the root of the Iran nuclear crisis is US-Iran conflict, and that the root cause of that conflict is mistrust.”

THIS VIEW is pure fantasy. No Iranian leader has ever given the US any reason to believe that this is the case. To the contrary, every Iranian leader since the 1979 Islamic Revolution has made clear that the regime is dedicated to the destruction of the US and Israel.

The Iranians do not wish to destroy the US and Israel because they distrust them. The likes of Ayatollah Khomeini, Ayatollah Khamenei, President Ahmadinejad and all of their comrades wish to destroy Israel and the US because they hate us. They hate us because as they see it, both nations represent forces that are antithetical to their revolution’s goal of Islamic world domination.

And yet, despite Iran’s obvious bad faith, and despite the fact that the much-touted sanctions against Iran have done nothing to slow the pace of its sprint to the nuclear finish line, the Obama administration insists on clinging to the fantasy that it can convince the Iranians that they can trust the US and therefore convince them to give up their nuclear weapons program.

Lacking any substantive means of defending this Tinkerbell-fairy-dust policy towards the most pressing threat to international security today, the only thing the Obama administration can tell increasingly distressed Israeli leaders is that we should trust them. They know what they are doing.

The bottom line?

So according to Barak and his associates, to prevent Israel’s isolation by securing US support, Israel ought to ignore the lessons of the Lebanon withdrawal, the phony peace process with the PLO, and the withdrawal from Gaza and move full speed ahead with policies that will make it impossible to defend the country.

As for the US, to win the support of Europe, Iran and Turkey, Obama has adopted policies that enable Iran to become a nuclear power, make Assad the most attractive leader in Syria, empower the most anti-American forces in Turkey and pressure Israel to renounce its right and ability to defend itself.

Standing alone never looked so good.

And "Standing Alone" will be Israel's ultimate fate in this world. Fortunately, they have God Himself as their support.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I am seeing alot of BULLISH opinions
on Gold in the media all of a sudden.
To me, that is REALLY bearish, really.

Gold is a commodity and has RISK
attached to it, believe it or not.
I would NOT be a buyer of gold here,

especially back over 1600 tonite.

Platinum is NOW selling at almost
a 200 dollar DISCOUNT to the Gold,
WHICH IN THE PAST indicates bear
market conditions, NOT bull market

safest place is cash.....

When people need liquidity and
cash in the coming CRASH, all
ASSETS including Gold will FALL
HARD.....this did happen in SEP/OCT 2008....look at the charts
if you do not believe me.

The need for cash becomes critical !!!! This is EWI's prediction
and I believe them all the way.

Stephen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>