The West is undergoing a deliberate and systematic undermining of its cultural and legal foundations, replacing the rule of law with a revolutionary ideology.
Across the Western world, a growing number of people are beginning to sense that something is profoundly wrong with our societies and cultures. The cries of “hypocrisy,” “double standards,” and “two-tier policing” are becoming louder as citizens grapple with the contradictions between what they are told and what they see with their own eyes.
Yet, what if these explanations only scratch the surface? What if the events we are witnessing aren’t merely inconsistencies in enforcement or failures of leadership but the result of something far more deliberate and systematic? Failing to understand the true nature of these changes could leave us unable to address them effectively—at least not before the damage becomes irreversible.
To illustrate this, let’s consider an example that encapsulates these concerns. This time, from Canada:
In Toronto, a man wearing a shirt representing the Jewish Defence League (JDL) is told by police that he must either remove it or reverse it so the text cannot be read.
First, let’s break down the surface-level aspects of this situation as anti-woke media might present them:
A man supporting the Jewish right to exist in Toronto is forced to hide his visible support for Jewish people. Meanwhile, the communist/Islamic alliance protesters—carrying flags, insignias, posters, signs, and banners for groups like Hizb’allah and Hamas—are openly allowed to display their allegiance to illegal terrorist organizations and chant genocidal slogans without consequence.
The JDL is not a banned group in Canada. Wearing their logo is not illegal. Unlike these protesters, the Jewish community and their supporters are not shutting down streets, harassing diners, or taking over entire city blocks every weekend without permits.
These are the obvious points that conservative media would likely highlight, but there is something much deeper and far more troubling here.
Let’s move beyond the surface and examine what this incident reveals about the last two decades in the West.
We know that skilled people with no criminal records who seek legal immigration to Western nations face enormous obstacles. The process is expensive, cumbersome, and punitive, leaving applicants vulnerable to deportation if they attempt to work or engage in productive activity.
Meanwhile, millions of illegals have poured into these countries with what appears to be active government support. Even local officials are often blindsided by the scale and speed of these operations.
Take, for example, a grassroots protest in Ottawa against the construction of large permanent tents, known as Sprung Structures, to house illegals in a West End neighborhood. The project was planned without consulting local residents and placed in an area with zero infrastructure to support such a population. Shockingly, the local city councilor, Wilson Lo, had to file a FOIA request just to uncover details about the plan. Even months later, his questions remained unanswered.
This deliberate sidelining of elected representatives to accommodate illegals is not a one-off occurrence—it’s part of a broader, coordinated strategy that demands closer scrutiny.
Clearly, then, the order to house large numbers of illegals was issued from higher up and was hidden from the actual elected representatives who would normally make these kinds of decisions.
Looking at how various protests are handled—whether it’s UK Labour Party Leader Sir Keir Starmer’s response to the Southport stabbings, U.S. President Joe Biden’s handling of the January 6th protests, the forced removal of a JDL hoodie in Toronto, or the thousands of communist-Islamic protests over Gaza in just the past 14 months—we can see an undeniable pattern.
Provoke the people of the West until they react, then criminalize the reaction, tightening the state’s vice grip against any form of defense people believe they can muster.
The pattern reflects the destruction of the rule of law and its replacement with an entirely different system of thought. This is where it becomes difficult.
Understanding such a fundamentally alien system from within our own worldview is almost impossible. At best, we can describe what we observe using our frame of reference. For example, some cultures attribute natural phenomena to the actions of gods, while others—rooted in Greek Socratic and Aristotelian traditions—see these phenomena as mechanical processes governed by mathematics and science.
It is challenging to transition from one system to another.
And this is where we are at. We have all been raised with a solid belief in the Rule of Law. By this, we mean that police have a duty to uphold the law. The law protects our personal property, our rights, and, to a degree, our safety, except where that infringes on our rights.
When we see police acting decidedly against the rule of law, for example, to favor a large, screaming, rabid mob chanting for genocide or claiming to be victims of one, we tend to see this in our own terms: that of hypocrisy or a double standard. Especially when people protesting for their rights as guaranteed in the law are punished, either by the state or their unofficial agents like ANTIFA or BLM.
The man in the video at the top of this post who was forced to remove his JDL hoodie was perfectly within his legal rights to wear it. But the police, at this point, act much like the Mafia “good cop” who tells an extortion target that “this is a nice house you have here. It would be a shame if something happened to it.”
If one needs a simple formula for understanding how things work in this new system, there is one.
The takeaway could be that there are only two groups in terms of how the communist-revolutionary state sees things:
Revolutionaries and counter-revolutionaries.
3 comments:
The idiots of the Islamic faith don't even realize they are being used by the Assembly of Satan in the same way that Antifa and BLM was used as enforcers. Once they have served their purpose and the demons are finished with them they will be crushed. Right now the targets are the easiest first. The ones that have been disparaged and afraid to stand for themselves as they have suffered a few years of propaganda making them scared of what they say and do as they might draw attention to themselves. They are the marginalized Christians and Jews of the true Faith based upon the word and WAY. WE may be persecuted in our faith in the SON, but WE as the faithful must persevere and not be afraid as we are not of this world. We are the CHOSEN. Just as in birth, WE will not hold onto the pain and
WE will gain everlasting life.
IN the END,
AS always happens, the self appointed gods will turn on each other at some point and Satan will devour them.
Remembering June 25, 1962 - Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962), a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools, due to violation of the First Amendment. My opinion - ruling violated the first amendment in text prohibiting the free exercise thereof and freedom of speech. Prayer written by a state not Congress. The right of the people peaceably to assemble in this case pray on public property. Ninth and Tenth Amendments, violated as well. In summary "Separation of Church and State" does not exist in any official federal government documents enumerated by our founding fathers. Phrase originated in a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists. Result, a victory for communist based groups in the United States and chaos since to the point of extinction.
Jimmy Carter - Desert One, stated as an incomplete success, a microcosm of a failed presidency that unravelled a nation.
Post a Comment