The latest setback in negotiations over the maritime border means Nasrallah could very well try to respond soon, perhaps even by testing Israeli nerves in various ways, be it with words or by sending drones.
The recent snag in the talks centers on the caveats Lebanon has over the most-recent draft proposed by the US mediator Amos Hochstein. Israel has flat-out rejected the proposed Lebanese changes, saying they run against its economic and security interests. The Israeli statement to that effect did not mention the word "political," although it is certain that politics played a role in Prime Minister Yair Lapid's response. In recent days he has been hammered for supposedly surrendering to Lebanese demands to secure a deal.
On the other hand, it's hard to see why Lebanon has taken this new posture. Yes, submitting reservations to a text is part of any negotiation, including last-minute revisions. But this time it appears that Lebanon tried to jump the shark. Only several days ago Prime Minister Najib Mikati said that the agreement has paramount importance because it will prevent a certain war. If that's his view, he should explain why his government has not embraced this deal and instead opted for an "all or nothing" approach.
No comments:
Post a Comment