Restaurant owners, gym owners, healthcare workers, teachers, and parents stood with San Diego County community leaders fed up with severe government-imposed COVID restrictions and confronted the San Diego County Board of Supervisors during a board meeting on Tuesday, August 17, just as the board is preparing to issue new response proposals to combat what it has deemed a “local health emergency.”
Should the board approve new recommendations put forth by local public health officials, San Diego County would be added to the expanding list of U.S. cities and counties instituting mandatory vaccine passports to enter restaurants and retail stores, and reinstating masking in schools and indoor public spaces.
On Tuesday, local media outlet KUSI news reported on the backlash from citizens, noting a community rally was held prior to the meeting, with the advocacy groups ReOpen San Diego, Let Them Breathe, and San Diego Rise Up providing the public with resources such as petitions and proclamations that businesses can display stating they are against the medical discrimination.
“We, the undersigned businesses of San Diego County, publicly declare we will never discriminate against anyone and deny them the right to eat based on a vaccine passport,” read one Proclamation Against Discrimination for San Diego Restaurants by the group ReOpen San Diego.
The nearly five-hour meeting largely consisted of public comments, where some 150 people addressed the board, following a public-health update by board health officer Dr. Wilma Wooten. Wooten presented data on vaccination rates and case-testing efforts in the county.
One constituent, Shaun Frederickson, called out Wooten specifically during his turn to address the board: “The numbers you stated are propaganda…. Last month … do you know how many deaths happened in the month of July? Wilma [Dr. Wooten]? Nathan [Board Chairman Nathan Fletcher]? Thirty six. How much propaganda are we going to use for the deaths of 36 people? How many rights are we going to take, and Nathan, how many lies are you going to continue to propagate?”
“There is already a recall effort started for one dictator, there will be another if necessary,” continued Frederickson, addressing Board Chairman Fletcher, referencing the recall election of Governor Gavin Newsom on September 14.
“Your authority is being pummeled…. We are here to inform you the people have spoken, COVID is over.”
France on Brink of Revolution As Families Are BLOCKED From Buying Food Without ‘COVID Passports’
A disturbing video out of France shows desperate shoppers being blocked from entering a supermarket by police because they don’t have COVID passports.
The footage shows residents, some with children, being blocked from buying essential food items by security guards.
The guards then begin pushing one woman away as the crowd becomes more upset.
A number of police officers then begin physically assaulting the frightened shoppers.
“Now they’re denying people access to food in France – if they don’t take an unapproved FDA vaccine for a virus with a 99.7% survival rate.”
Although France’s COVID passport law mandates proof of vaccination to enter larger shopping malls, those with a surface area of less than 20,000 square meters are supposed to be exempt.
Under the the draconian law, people in France who enter a bar or restaurant without a COVID pass face 6 months in jail, while business owners who fail to check their status face a 1 year prison sentence and a €45,000 fine.
As we highlighted earlier this week, anecdotal evidence suggests many businesses aren’t checking for COVID passports, perhaps spooked at images that showed many bars and restaurants to be almost empty after the scheme began.
Although police made a visible show of patrolling establishments to check people’s medical papers on the first day that the program began, this appears to have abated.
However, people who can’t show proof of having taken the jab are still banned from using inter-city public transport.
President Emmanuel Macron ludicrously defended vaccine passports last week by claiming they protected people’s freedom, which is like arguing that locking people up is for their own safety.
No comments:
Post a Comment