Israel presents militant fundamentalist Islam with a problem that no alteration of borders can finally resolve.
Territory can be divided. Security arrangements can be negotiated. Competing national claims can, at least theoretically, be compromised. But Israel represents something larger than territory. It represents the restoration of the Jewish people to sovereignty in their ancestral land, the revival of Jerusalem as the capital of a Jewish commonwealth, and the reappearance of biblical history in the modern world.
For Islamic movements that understand history as the progressive triumph of Islam, this restoration is not merely a political setback. It is a theological contradiction.
The problem was never simply that Jews lived in the Middle East. Jews lived throughout the Islamic world for centuries. The deeper problem is that Jews have become sovereign. They possess political power, command armies, govern Muslims and exercise authority in Jerusalem. A people formerly subordinated under Muslim rule has established an independent state in territory once governed by successive Islamic empires.
Israel therefore presents a unique theological challenge. Fundamentalist Islamic thought sees in the Jewish state an unbelieving people whose national restoration advances an entirely different account of history.
Fundamentalist movements insist that Islam’s authoritative sources should govern political life and that Islamic claims over land, sovereignty and sacred space cannot be permanently surrendered. These movements speak to a potential constituency numbering in the hundreds of millions.
For all practical purposes, therefore, the conflict cannot be understood without examining the war that Islam believes it is fighting against Israel.
The overturning of the Dhimmi order
Under Islamic rule, Jews were classified as dhimmis. Although the term is commonly translated as “protected people,” that protection existed within a system of legally enforced subordination. Jews were permitted to survive as a religious community on the condition that they accepted Muslim supremacy, paid the jizya (a tax on non-Muslims), and submitted to restrictions that distinguished them from Muslims and marked their inferior position.
The severity of those restrictions varied by ruler and period, but the hierarchy itself remained. Jews could live under Islamic authority; they were not supposed to possess authority over Muslims. They could be tolerated as a subordinate religious community; they were not supposed to become an independent political and military power.
Zionism overturned this order.
The establishment of Israel did not simply bring Jews back into the Middle East. It brought them back as rulers. The former dhimmi became sovereign. Jews commanded armies, governed Muslims, defeated surrounding Islamic powers and ultimately took political control of Jerusalem.
For fundamentalist Islamic thought, this reversal represents more than a military or territorial loss. It is an inversion of the divinely established hierarchy. The problem is not primarily the presence of Jews. The problem is Jewish power: Jews governing themselves, Jews ruling Muslims and Jews exercising sovereignty over territory that had entered the Islamic realm.
Israel is therefore uniquely offensive to this theological order. It does not merely exist outside Islamic authority. Its existence publicly overturns the Islamic order.
The humiliation of repeated defeat also matters. Islam presents itself not merely as one religion among others but as Allah’s final revelation—the true faith destined to prevail. How, then, can a Muslim world of nearly two billion people, possessing enormous territories, armies, wealth and natural resources, repeatedly fail to defeat one small Jewish nation? More fundamentally, how can the possessors of the 'true faith' be defeated by a people whose earlier revelation Islam claims to have superseded?
Israel’s survival therefore becomes a theological accusation. If Islam possesses the final truth and the sanction of Allah, why does Jewish sovereignty survive, strengthen and repeatedly defeat those seeking its destruction? Every Israeli victory deepens the contradiction between the expected triumph of Islam and the observable course of history.
The Jewish state appears to proclaim a different ending to history—one in which Jewish restoration, Jerusalem and the promises of the Hebrew Bible point not toward a restored Caliphate but toward the coming Messianic Kingdom.
No comments:
Post a Comment