Last year, the Australian Human Rights Commission (“AHRC”) demanded censorship of debate and views on climate change that do not align with the official narrative. The AHRC was proposing the removal of the fundamental human right to free speech to protect a false climate change narrative.
As P. Gosselin points out below, this desire to use climate change as a reason for censorship is not limited to Australia. In a report published in June 2025, Brussels-based EU DisinfoLab and UK-based Logically state that censorship is required because data, and scientific evidence which counters their narrative are due to distrust of “elites” and the deep state, hostile state actors and the “fossil fuel” industry.
By P Gosselin, 31 December 2025
Currently, EU leaders are fuming that US officials would be so audacious as to accuse them of practising censorship. Yet, when it comes to suppressing open discussions and differing viewpoints on major issues, things are in fact worse than most people think. And, it’s about to get even worse.
A recent (indirectly EU-funded) report released earlier this year shows how the EU is planning to broaden censorship to include the topics of climate and energy science.
In the ‘Harmful Environmental Agendas and Tactics’ (“HEAT”) report, published by EU DisinfoLab and Logically, its authors investigate how climate-related misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation (“MDM”) are strategically used to undermine climate policy in Europe, specifically in Germany, France, and the Netherlands.
[Note: UK-based Logically became a major source in recent years for Wikipedia to disparage the pages of people, media outlets and organisations that did not follow the Globalists’ narrative. Read more HERE.]
The report argues that climate disinformation has moved beyond simple science denial and has become a tool for broader political and social polarisation.
Outright denial of climate change, the authors claim, is being replaced by narratives focused on “climate delay.” These often acknowledge climate change but attack the feasibility, cost, and fairness of solutions, e.g., they claim green policies will bankrupt households or destroy industries.
The Enemies
The report identifies four main pillars driving these agendas:
- The Conspiracy Milieu: Distrust of elites and “deep state” narratives (e.g., the “Great Reset”).
- Culture War/Partisan Discourse: Framing climate action as an authoritarian or elitist project.
- Hostile State Actors (“HSAs”): Significant involvement of Russian-linked networks (e.g., Portal Kombat) that use localised domains like Pravda DE to amplify divisive climate content.
- Big Oil Alignment: Narratives that align with fossil fuel interests, even if direct corporate attribution is often obscured.
No comments:
Post a Comment