Have you heard that President Trump is working to actively establish “Region 1” for the “Club of Rome” and seeking to be appointed King of Region 1 for the rest of his life?
Yes, that’s essentially the claim circulating on social media.
At first I tried to ignore it, but instead of going away it’s only growing stronger.
As President Trump ratchets up talk to take over Greenland and turn Canada into the 51st state, so too are people shouting that this was all predicted (or rather planned out) by the Club of Rome decades ago.
But…is that true? Or is it just another “Internet Conspiracy” from the tin-foil hat people?
I had to investigate.
You know I love a good conspiracy theory around here. In fact, most of what we cover starts off as “conspiracy theory” and over time ends up being “conspiracy fact”. In other words, we end up being right over time on so many things.
But this is one I honestly hadn’t ever looked into too much.
Is the Club of Rome real?
Did they really draw up a map dividing the Earth into 10 Regions back in 1974?
Well….yes and yes.
Here’s an early drawing of what that map looked like:
Later stylized like this in color:
The Club of Rome designated it as Zone 1.
And yes, the USA + Canada + Greenland makes up “Region 1”.
That all appears to be factual and historically true.
The question that remains is whether this is just a grand “thought experiment” or something more devious hidden in plain sight.
Douglas C. Youvan produced an excellent paper on the topic which you can view here. This is a portion of his report:
By examining the historical context of the Club of Rome, the narratives surrounding the 10 Kingdoms map, and the principles of emergent phenomena,this paper aims to untangle the complex web of factors that continue to make this map a point of fascination, suspicion, and debate nearly fifty years after its creation.
In doing so, it also seeks to address a broader and more pressing question:
Are global power structures ultimately the product of intentional human design, the unintended consequences of our collective actions, or something far stranger—an emergent pattern beyond the comprehension of any single individual or organization?
In 1974, building upon the insights from Limits to Growth, the Club of Rome proposed dividing the world into 10 interconnected geopolitical and economic regions, often referred to as the “10 Kingdoms.”
The rationale was rooted in the belief that nations, acting independently and often in competition, could not effectively address planetary-scale issues such as:
Climate change
Resource scarcity
Economic inequality
The 10 Kingdoms map was, in essence, a thought experiment and a policy suggestion rather than a binding plan.Yet, the boldness of the proposal—combined with its stark visualization of a world divided into ten distinct blocs—captured public imagination and triggered intense debate.
The Club of Rome and Committee of 300 aka NWO came out with this map in the 70's. It has Canada and Greenland as part of the US in region 1. They plan on splitting the world up into 10 areas ruled by 10 Kings. This is also what the bible says. Trump is working for them.
This is not something I can just dismiss outright as fake.
These globalist organizations like the Club of Rome and World Economic Forum have never been “the good guys” as far as I can tell, and I’m not getting good vibes about this one either.
Grok had more details, trying to promote a more optimistic viewpoint that perhaps President Trump sees this not as fulfilling some 50 year old plan from the Club of Rome but rather just seeing it like a real estate mogul — and that’s a fair point:
The idea of a conspiracy involving the Club of Rome and a plan to divide the world into 10 nations stems from a 1973 report titled Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System, authored by Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel. This report, part of the Club’s “Strategy for Survival” project, proposed organizing the world into 10 interdependent regions to better manage global resources and crises. The regions were not about erasing national sovereignty but creating a cooperative framework.
However, some interpret this as a blueprint for a New World Order—a centralized global government—claiming it aligns with a hidden agenda to abolish nations and impose control.
This interpretation often ties into biblical prophecy, particularly from the Book of Revelation (17:12-14), which mentions “ten kings” who briefly rule with a “beast” before their downfall. Conspiracy theorists suggest the Club of Rome’s 10-region model is a step toward this scenario, orchestrated by global elites. Critics of this view argue there’s no evidence the Club has the power or intent to enforce such a structure—it’s a discussion group, not a governing body—and the report was a theoretical exercise, not a policy mandate.
2 comments:
Economic inequality, affordable housing, it takes a village, euphemisms for communism.
Unless the pole shift is real, and the major countries are positioning themselves to have habitat land after the shift!!!!!!!!!!!! and climate change and all that rubbish is just a cover for real earth changes. In roman times they once killed their slaves before an upcoming disaster so as not to have to compete with them for the remaining resources. I guess civil and international wars, disease, vaccines and famine should help with depopulation before the shift. God's wormwood will create the three days of darkness, the pole shift and cleanse the planet.
Post a Comment