In its own words, the WEF’s project is “to redefine the international system as constituting a wider, multifaceted system of global cooperation in which intergovernmental legal frameworks and institutions are embedded as a core, but not the sole and sometimes not the most crucial, component”.
While this may sound fairly benign, it neatly encapsulates the basic philosophy of globalism: insulating policy from democracy by transferring the decision-making process from the national and international level, where citizens theoretically are able to exercise some degree of influence over policy, to the supranational level, by placing a self-selected group of unelected, unaccountable “stakeholders” — mainly corporations — in charge of global decisions concerning everything from energy and food production to the media and public health.
The underlying undemocratic philosophy is the same one underpinning the philanthrocapitalist approach of people such Bill Gates, himself a long-time partner of the WEF: that non-governmental social and business organisations are best suited to solve the world’s problems than governments and multilateral institutions.
Even though the WEF has increasingly focused its agenda on fashionable topics such as environmental protection and social entrepreneurship, there is little doubt as to which interests Schwab’s brainchild is actually promoting and empowering: the WEF is itself mostly funded by around 1,000 member companies — typically global enterprises with multi-billion dollar turnovers, which include some of the world’s biggest corporations in oil (Saudi Aramco, Shell, Chevron, BP), food (Unilever, The Coca-Cola Company, Nestlé), technology (Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple) and pharmaceuticals (AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna). The composition of the WEF’s board is also very revealing, including Laurence D. Fink, CEO of Blackrock, David M. Rubenstein, co-chairman of the Carlyle Group, and Mark Schneider, CEO of Nestlé.
There’s no need to resort to conspiracy theories to posit that the WEF’s agenda is much more likely to be tailored to suit the interests of its funders and board members — the world’s ultra-wealthy and corporate elites — rather than to “improving the state of the world”, as the organisation claims.
Even though the WEF has increasingly focused its agenda on fashionable topics such as environmental protection and social entrepreneurship, there is little doubt as to which interests Schwab’s brainchild is actually promoting and empowering: the WEF is itself mostly funded by around 1,000 member companies — typically global enterprises with multi-billion dollar turnovers, which include some of the world’s biggest corporations in oil (Saudi Aramco, Shell, Chevron, BP), food (Unilever, The Coca-Cola Company, Nestlé), technology (Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple) and pharmaceuticals (AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna).
The composition of the WEF’s board is also very revealing, including Laurence D. Fink, CEO of Blackrock, David M. Rubenstein, co-chairman of the Carlyle Group, and Mark Schneider, CEO of Nestlé. There’s no need to resort to conspiracy theories to posit that the WEF’s agenda is much more likely to be tailored to suit the interests of its funders and board members — the world’s ultra-wealthy and corporate elites — rather than to “improving the state of the world”, as the organisation claims.
Perhaps the most symbolic example of the WEF’s globalist push is the controversial strategic partnership agreement the organisation signed with the UN in 2019, which many view as having drawn the UN into the WEF’s logic of public-private cooperation.
This corporate takeover of the global agenda, aided and abetted by the WEF, became particularly apparent during the Covid-19 pandemic. Global health policy and “epidemic preparedness” have long been a focus of the WEF.
In 2017, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) — an initiative aimed at securing vaccine supplies for global emergencies and pandemics, funded by government and private donors, including Gates — was launched in Davos. Then, in October 2019, just two months before the official start of the outbreak in Wuhan, the WEF co-sponsored an exercise called Event 201, which simulated “an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic”.
In the event of a pandemic, the organisers noted, national governments, international organisations and the private sector should provide ample resources for the manufacturing and distribution of large quantities of vaccines through “robust forms of public-private cooperation”.
1 comment:
Don't know everything about reputed information, but what comes to mind is, objectives laid out from WEF are for consolidating powers to control the masses on a Global scale, right? Oversight would be by whom? Trust whom?
This might look good on paper/created simulations/power grabs, but in reality, sounds unsustainable, and threatens freedoms, in my opinion. USA's Constitutional Laws does not include such conforming to adhere to any Global Organizations Agenda's, IMO! So where will the USA go from here?
We gave this Globalization thing an inch, and they took a mile! First conjured fear propagandized, then solutions implemented thus creating more strife resulted, in my opinion. A real crisis looming coming to light is,
will the USA break off their love relationship from this restraint? Those illusions from an Organization leaving crumbs for the masses, plenty for themselves, and under the guise to fulfilling their ideal world, needs addressed by laws already on the books, in my opinion. Prayers for boundaries both figuratively, and literally, will be enforced to improve real sustainability for our Nation! So, hopefully other countries come onboard, to survive and flourish with God's Blessings within their own boundaries, as well.
Sharing resources, doing business, is great, yet when wealth is collected unchecked by a few, and then ration back out in ways that restrict real freedoms for all, how can this be fair and square?? It won't work, Countries/USA don't want communal living like some grouped hippies on some global scale, in my opinion!! This business model for living should be a choice, not commanded/implemented, by some Globalists Agenda's, in my opinion.
Tis won't be sustainable, and the consolidated power will corrupt further those few Globalists that control the narratives, the resources, the wealth, the con's, IMO! Life is a balance, and does this sound like balancing the beams?? Perhaps it's a cycle needing rethinking at the global level!? This is the real world on planet Earth, not to be some simulations dependence on updated technology to provide clear, concise, solutions to, in my opinion!
Oh, stop any experimenting on mankind through labs funded to create such nasties, and then try on humanity itself, as been reputed so, right?! Reinventing the wheel has limitations, and where has common-sense gone in the big picture? IF it feels like communism, it very well might be, and History proves, communism is a failure; Wake-up America! If we all stop reading news, definitely stop watching news, what would happen? Less brainwashing perhaps? Less tolerance for stupid? That would be an experiment worth implementing, right?
Post a Comment