Saturday, June 21, 2014

'New World Order' (aka The Tribulation) Coming

If they will just be patient and wait a little while longer, it will come. Just like clockwork and the other fulfilled prophecies, they will get their 'New World Order' soon enough. 

As the saying goes, 'be careful for what you wish for'. In this case - be very very careful for what you wish for. 

China, G77 Tyrants, And UN Boss Demand 'New World Order'

A collection of over 100 of the world’s communist, Islamist, and socialist tyrants, along with some elected but mostly corrupt Third World regimes, gathered in Bolivia at the G77 plus China summit to demand what they called a “New World Order to Live Well.” United Nations boss Ban Ki-moon joined the anti-American, anti-freedom, anti-national sovereignty, anti-free market festivities, calling on the assembled rulers — the biggest bloc at the UN — to keep pushing “sustainable development” and global-warming alarmism with the goal of foisting global governance on humanity. Despite its significance, the historic 50th anniversary G77 summit went largely unnoticed in the establishment press.

In their final declaration, signed by more than 130 rulers from around the world, the regimes called for what amounts to global tyranny, central planning, and massive wealth redistribution from Western taxpayers to oppressive Third World governments. Everything must be in “harmony” with “Mother Earth” under a “sustainable” UN “international climate change regime,” they said. From a stronger UN better able to implement its “mandates” to empowering the UN General Assembly as an “emblem of global sovereignty” and advancing a global reserve currency run by the IMF, the radical screed demands a dramatic planetary transformation.

“We fully respect the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, particularly as they relate to equality among States,” the regimes said in the final agreement, calling for the “strengthening” of the UN for a wide variety of purposes. “We recognize that the United Nations needs to improve its capabilities and capacities to fully implement its mandates and to ensure the effective delivery of its programs in the social and economic development fields.” The agreement, dubbed the “Declaration of Santa Cruz: For a New World Order for Living Well,” also called for empowering the despot-dominated UN General Assembly to be a sort of veto-proof planetary legislature.

If implemented, of course, the centrally planned “New World Order” they outlined would, for the overwhelming majority of humanity, result in the opposite of “living well.” Instead, it would relegate liberty, prosperity, free markets, and national sovereignty to the ash heap of history. As usual, though, the regimes used deception to advance their extreme agenda. Purporting to be concerned about “climate change” and the poverty their rule has caused, for example, the governments said Western taxpayers must hand over their wealth and technology while giving up their freedom and sovereignty to the UN. The largely autocratic regimes also demanded more say in the emerging “global governance” regime.

Among the chief players at the Group of 77 and China summit, which now includes 133 governments despite the name, were some of the most brutal communist regimes on the planet. The ruthless dictatorship in Beijing was the most powerful participant at the summit. It has been calling for a “New World Order” for years, and billionaire financier George Soros has said publicly that the new order should be led by the brutal Chinese Communist Party. Another top coordinator at the summit was the Stalinist Castro dictatorship in Havana, which was repeatedly praised by UN leaders and fellow autocrats at the G77 conference.

The theme of the gathering was “Towards a New World Order to Live Well,” with the assembled rulers all posing for a picture in front of a giant backdrop displaying the slogan. Founded exactly 50 years ago, the official narrative is that the G77, which originally included only 77 regimes, was meant to serve as a “counter-weight” to groupings of more powerful governments in the West. The G20, though, along with the highest echelons of the Western establishment, are also advancing a remarkably similar “New World Order” by their own admission. Today, the G77 alliance’s membership rules over more than half of humanity and occupies some two thirds of the dictator-dominated UN General Assembly. If the UN body were to be given any sort of authority, the consequences would obviously be disastrous.

Ironically, one of the primary focuses of the summit attendees was “poverty.” The vast majority of the poverty around the world, of course, is a direct result of those very same corrupt governments trying to impose socialism and other Big Government policies on the populations they enslave and plunder. However, the supposed “solution,” according to those regimes, is more socialism — this time on a global scale, with wealth to be redistributed from taxpayers in the West to corrupt Third World governments under all manner of pretexts. Especially troubling to the rulers, most of whom live outlandish lifestyles on the backs of the populations they brutalize and the Western taxpayers who fund it, was “inequality.”

Of course, none of the New World Order blabber coming from tinhorn dictators is a new phenomenon. “We are creating a new world, a balanced world. A new world order, a multipolar world,” Venezuela’s late Socialist strongman Hugo Chávez told reportersduring one of his many visits to Communist China. His “new world order” includes China, Iran, Japan, and a significantly weakened United States, Chavez explained to the world. More recently, the regime in Beijing called for a de-Americanized “New World Order” under UN rule. George H. W. Bush, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, and countless other Western globalists have also called for a similar “New World Order,” even using the same term.

I know that there is still 21 percent of the population that believe in what they (the state-run media) promulgate through their lies, but let me set this straight, using words right out of the mouths of those I mean to expose:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
– David Rockefeller, in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting, June 1991

We also know that after 9/11, it was not the Taliban that asked the American people to give up rights that hundreds and thousands have fought, bled and died to give us; it was the American government that did, and they continue to do so by the force of circumstance.
We also know that Obama was in Europe before his presidency, telling the people that there is a need for a "New World Order," an "International Order" and that "There isn't any other way." So, while America's military is fighting off "terrorists" in other countries, this administration is attacking America.

Next question: Who are the terrorists?
We know that Henry Kissinger on May 31, 2007, said that those who oppose the New World order are "terrorists."

One thing is for sure, and there is no doubt, "terrorism" is working for the global community to strengthen their alliances toward a one-world government.
Speaking of Josef Stalin's totalitarian government, Condoleezza Rice said, "The system of terror was essential to Stalinism. … Terror was the creation to mold politically the control that they wanted."
Remember, as President James Madison rightfully said, "If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."

For over 5 years we have been explaining the hole that the fed has been digging (most ironically here). This morning's op-ed by Warsh and Druckenmiller highlights many of the problems but we leave it to Marc Faber to succinctly sum up the dilemma that the Fed faces (and by dilemma we mean, the plan) - "The more they print, the more inequality there is, the weaker the economy will become." Simply put, "it's a catastrophe," Faber told CNBC, "what the Fed has done is to lift asset prices, and the cost of living. In the meantime, the cost of living increases are higher than the wage increases. The typical American household income is going down in real terms." Recovery?

As we noted previously, the greatest irony of the entire "record income inequality" debate...
One can read 696 page neo-Marxist tomes "explaining" inequality in a way only an economist could - by ignoring the untold destruction economists themselves have unleashed on society with their "scientific theories" (and providing a "solution" to the inequality problem which wewarned readers was coming back in September of 2011orone can read the following 139 words by Elliott's Paul Singer which in two short paragraphs explains everything one needs to know about America's record class inequality, including precisely who is the man responsible:

Inequality in the U.S. today is near its historical highs, largely because the Federal Reserve’s policies have succeeded in achieving their aim: namely, higher asset prices (especially the prices of stocks, bonds and high-end real estate), which are generally owned by taxpayers in the upper-income brackets. The Fed is doing all the work, because the President’s policies are growth-suppressive. In the absence of the Fed’s moneyprinting and ZIRP, the economy would either be softer or actually in a new recession. 

The greatest irony is that the President is railing against inequality as one of the most important problems of the day, despite the fact that his policies are squeezing the middle class and causing the Fed – with the President’s encouragement – to engage in the radical monetary policy, which is exacerbating inequality. This simple truth cannot be repeated often enough.

IDF troops continued to arrest Palestinian suspects in the West Bank on Saturday, the ninth day of an operation to search for three kidnapped Israeli teenagers who were abducted June 12 from a hitchhiking post in the Etzion Bloc of settlements in the West Bank.

Israeli officials said at least 10 people were detained overnight, as forces raided 15 Palestinian charity organization with alleged ties to Hamas. The IDF said it searched over 140 homes overnight.
"Ten people were arrested overnight, bringing to 330 the number of wanted Palestinians arrested since the beginning of the operation,” a spokeswoman for the army said.

An area north of Hebron which was declared a closed military zone on Friday remained cordoned off on Saturday, with soldiers searching house-to-house in the area and no outside traffic allowed in.
A senior Israeli government official said Friday that the noose was tightening around the kidnappers.

Speaking to Channel 10, the official said that, based on security assessments, the teens were still somewhere in the West Bank and their abductors were unsuccessful in moving them in the direction of Jordan, Gaza, or Sinai.
Naftali Frankel, Gil-ad Shaar and Eyal Yifrach were last seen late on the night of Thursday June 12. Several Palestinian groups have taken responsibility for their abduction but the authenticity of the claims is questionable.

Palestinian terrorists in the Gaza Strip launched a rocket into Israeli territory on Saturday morning, causing alert sirens to sound out in the Ashkelon area.

On Thursday evening two rockets were fired into Israel, prompting the Israeli Air Force to strike five targets in the Gaza Strip overnight, aying it attacked three concealed rocket launchers in the northern Gaza Strip, a terror activity site in the central Gaza Strip and a weapons storage facility in the southern Gaza Strip.

The IDF regularly retaliates with air strikes in response to rocket attacks.
“We have repeatedly addressed the consequences facing those who seek to endanger the lives of innocent civilians,” IDF spokesman Lt. Col. Peter Lerner said in a statement regarding Thursday’s strikes. “We shall persist with our determination to combat terror elements and eliminate the pending threat to Israeli lives.”
Earlier Thursday, emergency sirens sounded in several cities in southern Israel and citizens reported hearing explosions after rockets were launched at the region from the Gaza Strip. One rocket was thought to have landed in open territory near the city of Sderot in the Sha’ar Hanegev Regional Council, while another was intercepted by the Iron Dome system near the city of Ashkelon. No casualties or damage were reported.

Also see:

No comments: