A Warning When They Say Peace And Safety

Trump's Gaza Peace Breakthrough: A Warning When They Say Peace And Safety

 PNW STAFF

President Donald Trump has now used one of the Bible's most prophetically charged phrases twice in connection with his efforts to reshape the Middle East.

After announcing a preliminary agreement with Iran in June, Trump wrote, "This Great Deal will bring Peace and Security to the whole Region." Regional hostilities subsequently resumed, demonstrating how quickly sweeping declarations of peace can outrun events on the ground.

Now Trump has announced what he calls a historic agreement for the complete disarmament of Hamas and every other armed group in Gaza.

"This is a monumental step toward lasting PEACE and SECURITY," Trump declared. 

For students of Bible prophecy, those words immediately recall the warning of 1 Thessalonians 5:3:

"For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them."

That does not mean Trump's agreement fulfills this passage. Christians should not force every peace initiative into a prophetic timetable. But Scripture repeatedly warns that the most dangerous moment may come when the world believes Israel's enemies have finally been contained.

Trump describes the agreement as a milestone in implementing his existing 20-point Gaza plan. Hamas and other terrorist groups would surrender their weapons in phases, Israel would withdraw as disarmament progresses, international forces would enter Gaza, and a technocratic Palestinian government would assume control.

Yet the details are less reassuring than the headline.

Hamas has made implementation conditional upon Israel fulfilling its obligations. Other accounts describe weapons being catalogued, stored or transferred to a Palestinian body rather than immediately destroyed under Israeli supervision. 

There is a vast difference between destroying Hamas's weapons and storing them. There is also a difference between dismantling Hamas and moving its fighters into a new Palestinian police force.

Hamas has floated a ten-year truce in which its weapons could be frozen while it retained what it calls the Palestinian "right to resist."

That may not be disarmament.

It may be strategic patience.

Ten years would give Gaza time to rebuild. It could also give Hamas time to restore its influence inside schools, mosques, charities, political organizations and security institutions.

Can An Ideology Be Disarmed?

Even if every rocket and rifle were collected tomorrow, the ideology that produced October 7 would remain.

Hamas is not merely an army. It is an Islamist movement whose influence reaches into religion, education, media, social services and government.

Weapons can be confiscated. Tunnels can be demolished. Commanders can be eliminated.

But an ideology must be defeated.

Any new Palestinian administration would have to reject Hamas's theology of violence, condemn the atrocities of October 7, remove terrorist indoctrination from schools and prevent Hamas operatives from controlling the police and civil service.

Otherwise, Hamas could disappear as an official government while remaining the power behind it.

For Israel, peace must mean that another October 7 can never happen.

This multinational structure also carries a striking prophetic parallel.

Daniel 9:27 says a coming ruler will "confirm a covenant with many" for one week, commonly understood by many prophecy scholars as a period of seven years.

The Hebrew wording translated "confirm" can carry the sense of making something strong, enforcing it or causing it to prevail. That leaves open an important possibility: the coming ruler may not necessarily create an entirely new treaty. He could strengthen, guarantee or impose an arrangement already in existence. Different translations render the expression as confirming, strengthening or making a firm covenant.

That is significant because Trump is not presenting the Hamas announcement as a completely new peace plan. He calls it a major milestone in implementing the 20-point framework that was already established.

This is not Daniel's covenant as there are too many missing pieces.

But the pattern is instructive.

An existing agreement is elevated by a powerful leader, supported by numerous nations, protected by international forces and presented as the answer to Israel's security crisis.

Revelation 17 adds another dimension. It describes ten kings who receive authority with the beast and then surrender their power and authority to him. 

Israel Dwelling Securely

Ezekiel 38 describes Israel living securely before the great invasion associated with Gog and Magog.

The present agreement does not mean Ezekiel's war is imminent. But it helps us imagine how the conditions could eventually arise.

Hamas is declared disarmed. International troops enter Gaza. Israeli soldiers withdraw. Foreign governments guarantee the agreement. Billions of dollars pour into reconstruction. World leaders announce that the threat has finally disappeared.

The danger is Israesl becomes convinced its enemies have been permanently contained.

October 7 demonstrated what can happen when deterrence, advanced technology and assumptions about an enemy's intentions create a false sense of security.

Daniel 8:25 provides another sobering parallel. It describes a coming ruler who, in the King James wording, "by peace shall destroy many."

His weapon is not only military force. It is deception operating under the appearance of security.

Jeremiah similarly warned of leaders crying, "Peace, peace," when there was no peace. Ezekiel condemned false prophets who promised peace while covering a dangerously unstable wall with whitewash.

The biblical pattern is clear: peace built upon deception eventually collapses.

Death toll rises to 34 after M7.1 Kumamoto earthquake

Death toll rises to 34 after M7.1 Kumamoto earthquake, over 267 000 remain under evacuation orders, Japan

Rishav Kothari

The death toll from the magnitude 7.1 earthquake that struck Japan’s Kumamoto Prefecture on July 28 has risen to 34 as of July 30, 2026. At least 123 people have been injured, while more than 267 000 residents remain under evacuation orders as authorities continue emergency response operations across the affected region.

The death toll from the powerful M7.1 earthquake that struck Japan’s Kumamoto Prefecture on July 28 has risen to 34, while 123 people have been injured and more than 267 000 residents remain under evacuation orders, Japan’s Fire and Disaster Management Agency (FDMA) reported on July 30.

The earthquake struck at 16:27 JST on July 28, reaching the maximum Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) seismic intensity of 7 in the municipalities of Uki City and Hikawa Town in Kumamoto Prefecture.

A tsunami advisory was issued for the Ariake and Yatsushiro Seas two minutes later before being lifted at 18:10 JST. Several strong aftershocks followed, including tremors reaching Shindo 5 Lower, affecting multiple municipalities across Kumamoto Prefecture.

According to the FDMA, all 34 confirmed fatalities have been reported in Kumamoto Prefecture. The agency’s confirmed 11 deaths in Yatsushiro City, 7 in Kamiamakusa City, 4 in Hikawa Town, 2 in Uki City, 1 in Kosa Town, and 9 additional deaths that remain under investigation.

Authorities also reported 123 injuries, including 5 serious injuries and 84 minor injuries, while 89 people required medical treatment.

Officials confirmed one house was destroyed, another suffered partial collapse, and several buildings experienced flooding or other damage.

Emergency responders continue to deal with isolated incidents, including a collapsed factory chimney in Yatsushiro City and the partial collapse of the second floor of a commercial building in Kamiamakusa City. Authorities reported no damage to critical infrastructure facilities.

Kumamoto Prefecture has issued emergency safety measures covering 46 610 households (92 743 people) and evacuation orders affecting 127 647 households, or approximately 267 285 people. Disaster response headquarters remain active in Kumamoto and neighboring Nagasaki prefecture.

Saudi Arabia Launches Red Sea Defense Coalition

Saudi Arabia Launches Red Sea Defense Coalition

Michael Katz  

Saudi Arabia announced the launch of a multinational defense coalition Thursday to protect commercial shipping and energy routes in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and Bab al-Mandab Strait.

Al Arabiya reported that the initiative was unveiled after a meeting in Riyadh that brought together representatives from 43 countries and the European Union.

"The extensive participation reflects growing international interest in strengthening maritime defense cooperation and underscoring the importance of unifying efforts to address shared threats to the security of international sea lanes within the alliance's designated area of responsibility," the state-run Saudi News Agency reported.

The move comes as the conflict between the United States and Iran has increasingly centered on the Strait of Hormuz. Recent disruptions to the strategic waterway, which carried about 20% of worldwide oil and gas exports, are weighing heavily on the global economy.

Bab al-Mandab Strait, which connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean, is considered one of the world's most important strategic waterways, through which about 12% of the global energy trade passes.

The passage is at the southernmost point of the Arabian Peninsula and is the main route for ships traveling through the Red Sea to the Suez Canal.

In a recent escalation, the Red Sea-Bab al-Mandab-Gulf of Aden shipping corridor has come under repeated attacks by Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists in Yemen.

Participants at the meeting reviewed escalating threats to maritime security, including attacks on commercial vessels, energy tankers and critical maritime infrastructure, the Saudi Gazette reported. They warned that such incidents pose risks to freedom of navigation, global supply chains and the international economy.

The meeting also examined the proposed charter for the alliance, its governance framework, organizational structure, command-and-control arrangements, operating mechanisms, and implementation plans.

Delegates also discussed foundational arrangements for the alliance, including Saudi Arabia's role as the founding nation, its leadership of the initiative and its hosting of the alliance's headquarters. The participants said the arrangement reflects international confidence in the kingdom's role in promoting collective maritime security.

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Sudan, Djibouti and Somalia were among those who signed a joint statement supporting the establishment of the coalition, according to the Saudi News Agency.

Lt. Gen. Joseph Clearfield, commander of the U.S. Marine Forces Central Command, and the defense attache at the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh represented the United States at the meeting, according to Al Arabiya.

It is unclear what role, if any, the United States will have in the coalition.

Gog-Magog Alliances Continue To Strengthen

Why Erdogan won’t fight the West’s war against Russia

RT

Since the start of Russia's military operation in Ukraine, the West has consistently sought to draw Türkiye into its policy of confrontation with Moscow. This was particularly evident at the this month’s NATO summit in Ankara when the West attempted to pressure the Turkish leadership into adopting a clear anti-Russia stance.

For Washington and Europe, Türkiye is particularly valuable. It is not just a member of the North Atlantic Alliance, but a country with the second-largest army in NATO, a developed defense industry, a strategic location in the Black Sea region, and significant influence in the Middle East and parts of Eurasia. 

Therefore, for the West, it is crucial to not just secure Ankara’s formal loyalty (which is already ensured by its NATO membership), but to make it part of the unified anti-Russia front. 

Ankara, however, continues to pursue a policy that significantly differs from the course of most NATO states. 

Türkiye has not joined EU sanctions against Russia or curtailed Russian-Turkish economic cooperation; moreover, it has maintained direct channels of communication with Moscow. The European Commission’s 2025 report noted that Türkiye has consistently refrained from joining EU restrictive measures against Russia, although it has taken steps to prevent sanctions from being circumvented through its territory. The trade turnover between Russia and Türkiye also remains high, despite external pressure.

Türkiye’s independent policy irritates the particularly radical elements of Western elites. 

 Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan views NATO membership not as a rejection of his own foreign policy, but as a tool for strengthening the Turkish state. Ankara is prepared to utilize the alliance’s capabilities, demand the lifting of restrictions on the Turkish defense industry, and seek access to modern weapons and European funding. However, it is not prepared to automatically sacrifice relations with Russia for the interests of Washington, Brussels, or Kiev.

This was clearly demonstrated by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan’s three-day visit to Russia on June 15-17. The packed agenda demonstrated Ankara’s desire to develop relations with Moscow. Fidan met with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Secretary of the Security Council Sergey Shoigu, representatives of the Russian leadership and the business community, and Rosneft CEO Igor Sechin. Fidan was also received by Russian President Vladimir Putin. The discussed topics included bilateral cooperation, energy, transport, regional security, and prospects for resuming Russia-Ukraine negotiations. 

Such active diplomacy demonstrates that Türkiye is unlikely to be drawn into an anti-Russia bloc. 

 Russian-Turkish relations are based not only on personal dialogue between Erdogan and Putin. Major energy, trade, investment, and infrastructure projects exist between the two countries.

Russia is currently constructing Türkiye’s first nuclear power plant, the Akkuyu NPP. At the end of 2025, Türkiye  announced that Russia would provide an additional $9 billion in funding for the project. For Ankara, severing such ties wouldn’t just be a symbolic demonstration of solidarity with the West; it would bring concrete economic losses and additional risks to energy security.

The situation in the Black and Azov seas is especially important for Türkiye. The escalating attacks on vessels directly affect Turkish interests. In June, Fidan noted that Kiev must avoid actions that could undermine security in the Black Sea and Türkiye’s interests. At that time, tankers near the Turkish coast, including a Turkish vessel, had been attacked. Ankara lodged formal protests to Ukraine in regard to these incidents.

More....

Digitization and Tokenization: The Great Taking of Private Assets

Digitization and Tokenization: The Great Taking of "All" Private Assets

Gary D. Barnett

“I do believe that we’re just at the beginning of the tokenization of all assets,, from real estate, to equity, to bonds..”

Larry Fink, CEO Blackrock

This is a subject that I have discussed on many occasions for years, but the acceleration of this atrocity of mass government theft is now progressing at lightning speed, and openly admitted to by the powers behind the throne. The evildoing Larry Fink, the CEO of Blackrock, who by the way, was Trump’s first choice for Secretary of the Treasury, (Position now filled by Scott Bessent) is also the Chairman of the heinous World Economic Forum (WEF). He also was a staunch supporter of Hillary Clinton and her run for president in 2016. His past is rife with far left-wing politics, so any notion that there is any difference between the democrats and republicans should by now be dismissed.

As well reported today by Parallel Mike of Parallel Systems, Romania’s entire land registry, and every back-up, was fully erased by a cyberattack; just as has been endlessly warned (threatened) about by Fink’s WEF organization. Every single property in Romania was threatened, due to no ownership records being available. All real estate markets, mortgage applications, notary services for land transfers were shut down. 

When no hard copy of deeds exist, and all is digitized, no one effectively owns anything, but that is exactly where we are headed. This is already the case with stocks and bonds, but the ruling class of globalists, desire to tokenize every asset on earth, including all property, financial assets, and even all individuals and their identities. If (when) this occurs, you will own nothing, and will lose control of everything you have ever worked for during your life.

This cyberattack scenario has happened many times in the near past, and seems to be a play to set up universal taking by way of digitizing and then tokenizing assets. 

Does this sound impossible to you? Does this sound like a ‘conspiracy theory?’ Does this sound like science fiction? It is none of these things, except a true conspiracy, as this attempt to take over every single asset on earth (The Great Taking) is not only well on its way to coming to fruition, it has been codified into law in Trump’s ‘Genius Act.’ 

This heinous piece of legislation is meant to tokenize every single asset class, by placing a monetary value on every asset by digital asset exchange. A Digital Asset Service Provider will have power to affect:

(i) exchanging digital assets for monetary value;

(ii) exchanging digital assets for other digital assets;

(iii) transferring digital assets to a third party;

(iv) acting as a digital asset custodian; or

(v) participating in financial services relating to digital asset issuance.

The monetary unit that will be used is Trump’s ‘Stablecoin,’ which will be dependent on treasury bond backing (forced debt) administered by a private/government partnership, (Fascist) which will have a wide open back door, making it more dangerous and thieving than a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).

This of course was the plan all along, as Trump used lies to claim his denial of any use of CBDCs while all the time knowing that his Stablecoin was nothing more than a CBDC on steroids.

When one does not hold an actual physical ownership certificate, when it becomes digital, the bank or digital holder now takes ownership of that asset away from the actual owner. 

 ‘Legally,’ you no longer have any real claim to that asset, and with tokenization, control over assets by legitimate owners becomes impossible. This is theft by government fiat, and any excuse, any claimed ‘emergency,’ any political dictate, has the ability to program use and/or ownership of all assets tokenized.

Tokenization, the next step after digitization, is the process of converting ownership of an asset into a digital token on a blockchain. 

This of course is sold to the ‘public’ as a safer way to hold assets, with more convenience, but what is not normally (almost never) discussed is the loss of ownership capability, and the vastly increased risk of theft by government technocrats, and the ability for thieving fascist government partners, to have instant programmable control over all tokenized assets. 

Do you understand what this means? It means that as Larry Fink’s organization, the WEF, was telegraphing the desired future when the evil Klaus Schwab said; “You will own nothing and be happy.” His statement was not some ideological hope, it was a statement of solidifying a sought after and pursued outcome that is now close to becoming completed.

Once assets are tokenized, a total loss of control becomes the norm. What this means, is that any asset you may own, or thought you owned, can become subject to theft by the State at any moment, and for virtually any reason made up by the controllers of these tokenized assets. 

The plot is to tokenize absolutely everything, every property, every asset on earth, financial, real estate, stocks, bonds, hard assets, including your own identity and body. 

This, if allowed to take place, would eliminate all property rights entirely, leaving the masses void of any property, and therefore fully dependent on the State. Your life in entirety would become one as a renter beholding to the very masters you allowed to lord over you under the guise of a ‘benevolent’ government. Nothing of the sort has ever existed, and it never will exist.