Manufactured 'Consensus' And The Opinion Cartel

Unmasking Academia: The State’s Ministry Of Opinion

CDM Staff

The man who would weaken the state must begin, not at the tax office, but at its ministry of opinion. Rothbard shows in his classic essay, The Anatomy of the State, that a predatory ruling apparatus cannot endure by force alone; it requires a caste of “court intellectuals” to wrap plunder in a halo of necessity, science, and morality. In his discussion of revisionism, he underlines that these intellectuals are paid to “bamboozle” the public in favor of power, fogging history and theory alike.

In the modern world, that ministry of opinion is housed above all in tax-financed universities and research institutes. There the state’s preferred intellectuals are trained, credentialed, and installed as guardians of “knowledge,” and from thence they sanctify the state’s depredations as inevitable, “evidence-based,” and morally enlightened. Any libertarian strategy against the state must therefore put the delegitimization and defunding of this caste at the center of its program.

The Academic Cartel

The university must be described not as a neutral temple of truth but as a cartelized guild. Hoppe notes in his analysis of natural elites and intellectuals that modern intellectuals are overwhelmingly tax-funded, tenured, and shielded from consumer feedback, which allows their output to become “ever more voluminous” and “viciously statist.” This is a structural result of their position as publicly funded monopolists. The mechanisms are straightforward:

• Control of entry through degrees, accreditation, and hiring committees;
• Use of jargon and hyper-technical writing as a shield against lay scrutiny;
• Reward of ideological conformity to interventionist fashions in economics, law, sociology, and education

Rothbard’s history of public schooling already shows this pattern at a lower level. From the early republic, public schools were openly justified as instruments to mold citizens into obedient servants of the state, crush dissenting sects, and assimilate minorities. Schooling was consciously used as a weapon to regiment language, belief, and behavior. The modern university is simply the same project at a higher intellectual tier.

The academic aura of “disinterest” is fraudulent. The material existence of the professoriate depends on ever-expanding budgets, subsidies, and grants. When the very livelihood of a class depends on state expenditure, its purported neutrality is a joke.

Manufactured “Consensus”

The prestige of the academic caste rests heavily on appeals to “the consensus of experts.” The libertarian must relentlessly unmask this consensus as a manufactured product of political incentives. Within any discipline there are real disagreements; yet what the layman hears as “the consensus” is usually the viewpoint that survived three filters:

1. Funding priorities that reward certain questions and conclusions;
2. Hiring and tenure that quietly exclude heterodox thinkers;
3. Professional position statements that bless official policies as “science”

Hoppe’s account of the modern intellectual class describes how—once education is thoroughly state-funded and dominated by democratic ideology—the number of intellectuals multiplies while their quality falls and their politics converge toward ever more interventionism, precisely because their jobs and status depend on it. Hoppe makes explicit that today’s academics form an opinion cartel: they set the boundaries of “respectable” thought and brand those outside as cranks or heretics.

More....