'Who Are These People'?

Diaper Report

Eric Peters Autos

Two bizarre things happened overnight. Well, one of them happened a long time ago.

First – last night – the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) voted unanimously (15-0) to “recommend” that the drugs styled “vaccines” be essentially forced upon children – by adding these drugs that aren’t “vaccines” to the “childhood vaccination schedule” that is a requirement (not a “schedule”) for kids to be permitted to attend government schools. And more than that, since any parent who refuses to have their kids injected with whatever the CDC “recommends” risks having their kids taken away by government “protective” services.

The latter is interesting because these drugs offer no protection against a sickness kids are generally immune to in the first place and which the drugs styled “vaccines” do not prevent them from getting – or giving. But which are admitted to be capable of giving them myocarditis and pericarditis, two variants of heart inflammation that result in lifelong debility as well as outright death, in numerous cases.

Yet the CDC – who are these people? – says “COVID-19 vaccination is the single best way (in green bold type) to protect people from serious COVID Illness.”

No, it’s not.

A healthy immune system – and being healthy – is “the best way to protect people from serious COVID illness.” This is a fact – based on the data (which The Science now regularly ignores). People who aren’t already chronically sick or morbidly obese are at slight, if any risk of “serious COVID illness,” a fact that The Science admits and ignores at the same time. And people who are kids – and healthy – are at even lower risk, essentially nil – another fact admitted to and ignored by The Science.

The CDC goes on to repeat the redefinition of “vaccines” it promulgated when it became apparent (and probably well before) the “vaccines” were shown to not immunize those who took it: “COVID vaccines (sic) continue to be effective in reducing the risk of severe disease, hospitalizations and death, including against the currently circulating Omicron variants.”

How does one “reduce the risk of severe disease” of a common cold – which is what the Omicron variant is admitted to be for almost everyone and especially children?

How does one even establish that these drugs “reduce the risk of severe disease” in anyone?

What is the basis for this claim? It is an assertion. Like the one about “masks” “working.”

Tens of millions of people who never took these drugs that aren’t “vaccines” weren’t hospitalized, had no “severe” disease. Clearly, their healthy immune systems – and being healthy – were very (and objectively) effective at “reducing the risk of severe disease and hospitalizations and death.” Why does The Science give no weight to this (15-0) while putting all of its weight behind this agenda of forcing drugs on everyone within the CDC’s clutches, including kids who need these drugs like a horse needs horseflies?

Then the bald-faced (and in your face) lie: “The benefits (once again in green bold type) of COVID-19 vaccinations (sic) outweigh (in green, again) the known and potential risks, including the very small risk of myocarditis or pericarditis.”

How the ---- – pardon the language, but profanity is sometimes warranted as the only way to express the necessary umbrage –  would these creatures know in advance what the “potential” risks are?

These being the same creatures who did not know –  or did not tell – people about the “potential” risks of their hearts (and the hearts of their children) being lifetime damaged by these drugs that aren’t vaccines? There have been no long-term trials, so no one knows “in advance” what other risks attend the taking of these drugs.

More deeply, what – who gives these creatures the right to make life and death decisions for other people – and other people’s children? The risk is “very small,” eh? Well, how about you take it, then? And why doesn’t the fact that the risk – of the ‘Rona – is also very small carry anyweight with these creatures?

Which circles us back to – who are these creatures? How did this thing styled the “CDC” acquire de facto dictatorial powers over us? Did you – did anyone – vote for the “CDC” to be the arbiter of our health – and our health decisions? Whatever happened to “our democracy,” as the Left incessantly brays – or rather, brays when it serves?

The “CDC” and its minions – including the ugsome little doctor who has been interestingly invisible in the weeks prior to the midterms – are manifestations of the Bureaucratic State that no one ever voted for.

 It grew – like black mold in a dank (and dark) basement. It has come to wield far more power than “our democracy” – this business of voting in or out politicians who have ceded constitutional legislative authority to the bureaucracy, which we the people have no ability to vote out of office.

Dr. Fauci has been in office for more than 40 years – and not once did he ever run for election.

We are not cattle but people. We have the right to decide for ourselves and most especially for our kids – who do not belong to the CDC or any other bureaucracy – what is best for ourselves. We have the inalienable right to refuse to take risks when there is essentially no risk. But it goes beyond even that. If there is a risk, it is ours to take.

The decision rightly belongs to no one else.