Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Lies And Distortions: The Deep State Attempts To Overthrow An Elected U.S. President

Russian At Donald Trump Jr. Meeting Worked With FBI While Special Counsel Robert Mueller Was FBI Director

[Lets be honest and call this exactly what it is]

The Russian translator at the Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. worked with the StateDepartment and the FBI during Robert Mueller’s tenure as Director of the Bureau.  I know because I worked with the FBI while the translator was employed there.
Mueller, the former FBI director, is currently the United States Special Counsel investigating President Donald Trump’s administration and White House aides for alleged connections to supposed Russian factions. While Big Media has tried to portray Trump’s eldest son, Donald Jr., as having orchestrated a clandestine meeting with the Russians to attempt to find dirt on Hillary Clinton, few can seem to explain how a person linked to the FBI and Mueller, who was calling the shots for the Bureau at the time, ended up at the very same Trump Tower sit down.
Mueller’s office did not return calls for comment. The translator, Anatoli Samochornov, who also worked for the US State Department until recently, could not be reached for comment either. Former FBI officials with knowledge of the meeting and possible other FBI work performed by Samochornov refused to go on the record.
Samochornov worked as an intelligence attache and translator for the United States in varying capacities for years. From my former colleagues at the FBI, I can tell you with 100% certainty that in 2010, while Mueller was FBI Director, Samochornov worked with the head of the New York FBI field office, FBI Acting Special Agent in Charge Lauren Anderson. Anderson worked with Samochornov in his role as “Program Officer” tor the State Department’s International Visitor & leadership program.
Anderson, who is now retired from the FBI, could not be reached for comment, although she has been quoted in the New York Times applauding ex-FBI boss James Comey’s alleged diligent note taking for his alleged memos compiled against President Trump. Anderson worked high profile espionage cases in Europe, Russia, France, and western Africa for the Bureau and ran the global terrorism program of the FBI’s New York Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) before her recent retirement, FBI sources said.  From 1993 through 2008, I also worked  with the FBI, and the final 5 years, (2003-2008) with the Joint Terrorism Task Force as well.
A web paged archived by the FBI New York Field office shows Samochornov and Anderson. It appears below.  Double click the image to enlarge it. While the archived page does identify Samochornov, searching the Russian-born translator’s name via the search bar on the FBI site does not retrieve any results.
Since I know where to look for such things thanks to my years working with the FBI, I got it.
Lawmakers and Justice Department officials need to examine what, if any, additional roles or work Samochornov performed for and with Mueller’s FBI. The appears to be yet another glaring question of conflict of interest for Special Counsel Mueller. They are piling up.


Based on my years of work with the FBI in the areas of National Security, Terrorism and Foreign Counter-Intelligence, it is beginning to APPEAR to me as though this entire "Russian Interference in the Election" was a poorly-planned Intelligence Operation run from within the CIA (Former Director John Brennan) and British Intelligence (under former Prime Minister David Cameron) neither of which was chartered to do work inside the USA.  So they enlisted the help of the only intelligence agency that DID have a charter to work inside the USA:  The FBI (Director James Comey) and to get that done, they needed approval from the Department of Justice (Loretta Lynch).
The plan was quite simple: Set up a meeting between someone in the Trump Campaign and a hostile foreign power, to make it LOOK as though a foreign government helped Trump . . .  in the event Trump actually won . . . . which NONE of them thought possible.  
Then, Trump won! (Thank God.)
So the Democrats, knowing this meeting had taken place, intentionally beat the drums about (non-existent) "Russian Interference" for 6 months after Trump was inaugurated, to pound-into-the-skulls-of-the-public the notions there actually was such Russian Interference, knowing all along that once they embedded this notion in the public mind, they would spring this meeting up as "proof" to achieve what is actually a Coup D' Etat.
This is the only THEORY which fits the facts.  And the facts are as follows:
None of the participants in this intentionally fraudulent Intelligence SMEAR Operation ever figured that Trump, Jr. would reveal his full email chain with Rob Goldstone, proving there was nothing nefarious taking place.
None of them ever figured that video from a US House Committee Meeting, 8 days AFTER the Trump, Jr. Meeting with the Russian lawyer, would show the same Russian Lawyer seated behind Barack Obama's former Ambassador to . . . . RUSSIA . . . . and that folks would retrieve the video from C-SPAN to prove the Russian Lawyer was working with the Democrats.
None of them ever figured that it would be revealed that the US Justice Department (Loretta Lynch) would be caught having granted entry to the USA for the Russian Lawyer . . . WITHOUT A VISA , and that the information would be so widely disseminated as has now happened.
None of them ever figured that Rob Goldstone would stupidly mention his involvement, and thus reveal HIS likely and alleged role with British Intelligence, as many now suspect.
None of them figured that British Intelligence would be caught in cahoots with the CIA because the Brits had just "suffered" the BREXIT vote and they didn't want another anti-Globalist (Trump) winning power.
None of them figured Trump would FIRE Comey; which has taken place.
None of them figured we would find out that the eighth person at the Trump, Jr. Russia meeting was, in fact, a US State Department / FBI Translator under Robert Mueller . . . 
None of them ever worried that it would come out that Comey and Mueller were on the same Rowing Crew in college or that Comey could rely on Mueller for revenge against Trump for being fired.
It looks to me like this "Intelligence" operation . . . was pretty damned stupid.  I think they're all caught! 
President Trump should confront Robert Mueller, Loretta Lynch, James Comey in the Oval Office, ask them to explain themselves and when they refuse - which they all likely will, probably by asserting their right to remain silent -- Trump should FIRE Mueller on the spot, then bring in the Attorney General and have him personally order the ARREST of Lynch, Comey and Mueller on a charge of Conspiracy to overthrow the President of the United States, Official Misconduct and Lying under Oath to Congress (Perjury).
Because, folks, in my personal opinion as a 55 year old natural-born American, and a former "fully operational, Extra-Territorial" operative of FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force operations, I personally believe that what we're seeing in this whole Russia-Interference thing is, in fact, a Conspiracy and an actual attempt to overthrow our President.
Of course, that would be a fact for a Jury to decide.  But the first step in getting this to a jury is to effect an arrest.  Indictments can follow.  Then, the trials.
I call for the arrest of Loretta Lynch, James Comey and Robert S. Mueller III for Conspiracy to overthrow a President of the United States.
Once it is determined who knew what, and when, there could be additional arrests of any Democrat (or Republican) who knew this was going on and failed to reveal it.  Such people might be charged as Accessories, or for Misprison of a Felony.  That would "drain the swamp" quite quickly and finally put to rest this utterly absurd - and quite nefarious- Russian Interference nonsense.
That's my take, now have your say.  

The real crime: Collusion between media, leakers

 In the 19th century, power meant control of the means of production; today, power lies in control of the means of communication.
Who controls the media spotlight controls what people talk about and think about. And mainstream media are determined to keep that spotlight on Trump-Russia, and as far away as possible from their agenda – breaking the Trump presidency and bringing him down.
Almost daily, there are leaks from the investigative and security arms of the U.S. government designed to damage this president.
Just days into Trump’s presidency, a rifle-shot intel community leak of a December meeting between Trump national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn and Russia’s ambassador forced the firing of Flynn.

An Oval Office meeting with the Russian foreign minister in which Trump disclosed that Israeli intelligence had ferreted out evidence that ISIS was developing computer bombs to explode on airliners was leaked. This alerted ISIS, damaged the president and imperiled Israeli intelligence sources and methods.
Some of the leaks from national security and investigative agencies are felonies, not only violations of the leaker’s solemn oath to protect secrets, but of federal law.
Yet the press is happy to collude with these leakers and to pay them in the coin they seek. First, by publishing the secrets the leakers want revealed. Second, by protecting them from exposure to arrest and prosecution for the crimes they are committing.
The mutual agendas of the deep-state leakers and the mainstream media mesh perfectly.

Consider the original Russiagate offense.
Confidential emails of the DNC and John Podesta were hacked, i.e., stolen by Russian intelligence and given to WikiLeaks. And who was the third and indispensable party in this “Tinker to Evers to Chance” double-play combination?
The media itself. While deploring Russian hacking as an “act of war” against “our democracy,” the media published the fruits of the hacking. It was the media that revealed what Podesta wrote and how the DNC tilted the tables against Bernie Sanders.

If the media believed Russian hacking was a crime against our democracy, why did they publish the fruits of that crime?
Is it not monumental hypocrisy to denounce Russia’s hacking of the computers of Democratic political leaders and institutions, while splashing the contents of the theft all over Page 1?
Not only do our Beltway media traffic in stolen secrets and stolen goods, but the knowledge that they will publish secrets and protect those who leak them is an incentive for bureaucratic disloyalty and criminality.
Our mainstream media are like the fellow who avoids the risk of stealing cars, but wants to fence them once stolen and repainted.
Some journalists know exactly who is leaking against Trump, but they are as protective of their colleagues’ “sources” as of their own. Thus, the public is left in the dark as to what the real agenda is here, and who is sabotaging a president in whom they placed so much hope.
And thus does democracy die in darkness.
Do the American people not have a “right to know” who are the leakers within the government who are daily spilling secrets to destroy their president? Are the identities of the saboteurs not a legitimate subject of investigation? Ought they not be exposed and rooted out?
Where is the special prosecutor to investigate the collusion between bureaucrats and members of the press who traffic in the stolen secrets of the republic?

It is hard to see when this ends, or how it ends well for the country.

1 comment:

Caver said...

Oh Wow! Had no idea how wide, deep, and organized this was. Amazing research. Agree....its time some very high profile folks went to prison on this.