Don't forget, the genesis of the EU was wrapped around economic trade treaties and evolved into the EU that we know today. One of the biggest steps towards full globalism can be found in the new trade agreements which are wrapped in secrecy - kept away not only from the public, but from congress as well.
Barack Obama is secretly negotiating a global economic treaty which would destroy thousands of American businesses and millions of good paying American jobs. In other words, it would be the final nail in the coffin for America’s economic infrastructure. Obama knows that if the American people actually knew what was in this treaty that they would be screaming mad, so the negotiations are being done in secret. The only people that are allowed to look at the treaty are members of Congress, and even they are being banned from saying anything to the public. American workers are about to be brutally stabbed in the back, and thanks to all of this secrecy and paranoia they won’t even see it coming.
The name of this new treaty is “the Trans-Pacific Partnership”, and it is being touted as perhaps the most important trade agreement in history. But very few people in this country are talking about it, because none of us are allowed to see it. An article that was just released by Politico detailed the extreme secrecy that is surrounding this trade agreement…
Right now, there are 12 countries that are part of the negotiations: the United States, Canada, Australia, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. . And it is hoped that the EU, China and India will eventually join as well. This is potentially the most dangerous economic treaty of our lifetimes, and yet there is very little political debate about it in this country.
It is basically . Thanks to leaks, we have learned that so many of the things that Obama has deeply wanted for years are in this treaty. If adopted, this treaty . This treaty includes many of the rules that alarmed Internet activists so much when SOPA was being debated, it would essentially ban all “Buy American” laws, it would give Wall Street banks much more freedom to trade risky derivatives and it would force even more domestic manufacturing offshore.
Greg Daco of Oxford Economics says he expects the wider than expected trade deficit to prompt the government to revise its estimate of 0.2% growth in U.S. gross domestic product for the first quarter .
One of the top stories on the Voice of America, our government’s admitted propaganda outlet, is about how the Pentagon has officially begun training the so-called moderate Syrian rebels on the ground in Syria to fight the Islamic State.
The Pentagon says it has started training moderate Syrian rebels to fight against Islamic State militants on the ground in Syria.
U.S. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter told reporters Thursday that 90 highly-vetted individuals began training at a secure location, which he did not disclose, and that the program will gradually expand.
“This is a complex program. It’s going to have to evolve over time,” Carter said. “We’re starting with the people … that we vetted very carefully. We’re figuring out what the best training is, what the best initial deployment is. We expect that to be successful and therefore to grow. But you have to start somewhere.”
“Highly-vetted,” huh? How’s that exactly?
As I’ve previously reported, it is on record that the U.S. has trained and funded ISIS and without the U.S. government, ISIS would not be the threat we are told it has become.
Now our government is going to train and arm more people to fight the people the government armed and trained.
Yet somehow the American people are still supposed to believe there is a clear cut “good guy” (the moderate Syrian rebels) and a “bad guy” (ISIS) here. How simple-minded and ignorant they must think we all are.
I’ve written multiple articles (here, here, and here) on the fact that good ‘ol Uncle Sam in the form of the Obama Administration has sent hundreds of millions of dollars to ISIS, the terrorist enemy in Iraq and Syria that our government also helped train which has apparently gotten so bad now, the government just has to start airstriking Syria (in addition to the strikes already taking place in Iraq) to stop them.
There is no such thing as the “Free Syrian Army” as our media outlets pretend. As Aron Lund broke it down at some length, there is no unified, organized rebel faction in Syria that we can actually point to and go, “Yep, that’s clearly the FSA.”
…the FSA doesn’t exist – at least not as commonly perceived. Global Syria coverage would be a lot less confusing if journalists didn’t persist in pretending that it does…
Remember when John McCain came under heavy media fire for posing in a picture with some supposed Syrian rebels?
Surely those guys weren’t ISIS, right? They were definitely rebels?
Is that why those guys, who definitely aren’t related to ISIS in any way, then used the pictures of McCain’s visit as the star feature of a new ISIS recruiting campaign over there?
Afterwards he went on to reassure CNN’s Anderson Cooper in an interview not to worry about the U.S. government funding the rebels in these conflicts because, “We can identify who these people are. We can help the right people.”
Oh really… Can we?
Is that why McCain later slipped up on Fox about who exactly we armed?
“Hillary Clinton has described already the meeting in the White House over two years ago… everyone in the national security team recommended arming ISISand the President, by himself, turned it down,” McCain said. [emphasis added]
Surely he meant to say the rebels, right?
Gee, even Senator McCain accidentally refers to the rebels as ISIS and can’t seem to tell the difference.
But it’s okay, we’re sending hundreds of millions of dollars over there and the Pentagon is on the ground in Syria right now training and arming… someone, and the program is set to expand soon.
Anjem Choudary's Inflammatory Comments Against Pamela Geller Demonstrate Why Islam Is Not A 'Religion Of Peace'
I know that many may grow weary of the writing of events that took place on Sunday evening in Garland, Texas. Rest assured, that will not be the last you hear of Islamic jihad attacks on US soil. In fact, according to a fatwa put out on Pamela Geller and the words of UK Islamic imam Anjem Choudary, there is no doubt there is more to come, but we aren't backing down nor are we fearful. We simply have our eyes open
Sean Hannity hosted Choudary and Geller on his show on Wednesday and what the man said is absolutely appalling. He not only told Pamela Geller that referring to her as a "khanzeer" (pig – the same term Muhammed used to describe hundreds of Jews before he beheaded them) was "too good for" her, but sided with the jihadists in calling for her death.
Anjem has been behind many Islamic terrorists throughout the world. Many have been taught in his own mosque in the UK and yet, people like David Cameron cover for him and those of his ilk. He has also called for the worldwide implementation of Shariah.
While Anjem claims to stand behind the death penalty for those who insult Islam, he slithers his way through the grass by not openly endorsing the jihadists in Texas, but rather when called on it says that Geller should be brought before a Shariah court, tried and if found guilty, executed. But make no mistake, he supports the jihadists that tried to kill her just like he does those in the Middle East who are murdering Christians, Muslims and non-Muslims.
However, it is the issue of free speech that Choudary has an issue with. No one that I can think of, whether they are Christian or any other religion, have resorted to violence in modern times for people doing things in which people draw things to make political statements. Yet, Islam is held captive by a demonically influenced pedophile's teachings that keep them in the sand age.
While the Islamic State claims to have trained over seventy "lions," which I call "cubs," they forget that there are literally tens of millions of Americans who are armed and trained and duty bound to take them down should they show their cowardly faces. This was aptly demonstrated in Texas on Sunday evening.
The Islamic State has put a hit out on Pamela Geller, but that has not deterred her. The so-called "conservatives" like Laura Ingraham have punched her in the face, as well as the state-controlled media.
First, Choudary acknowledges that she should be killed, not for insulting Muhammad, but for hosting an event in which drawings of Muhammad were on display. "Let's be clear, we're not talking about Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck," he said. "We're talking about people who deliberately had a competition to insult the messenger Muhammad."
Frankly, they weren't insulting him. They were being truthful about the character and nature of the man. Furthermore, Choudary went on to claim that if people insulted Jesus, he would feel the same way. Yet, he rejects the claims of Christ Jesus as God manifested in the flesh (John 5:18; Php. 2:6)! How much more insulting can you be? By his own words, he condemns himself and the whole of the anti-Christ religion known as Islam.
Second, Choudary affirms what we have been saying all along and that is the media is lying to you about Islam being a religion of peace. Again, though he never said that the jihadists were right in how they carried out their attack (something he has affirmed previously, just like Muhammad), he did state that he was all for the death penalty for Geller.
Third, Choudary demonstrated that Islamists do not know how to control their anger, something that the Bible teaches that we should do, but rather they take matters into their own hands to murder others.
Fourth, Choudary tries to claim that Shariah is the "divine law." No, it is supplanting the divine law given to men in the Scriptures. Shariah is a demonically twisted version of the divine law, period.
Fifth, Choudary is a coward. While he praises those who carry out these attacks and justifies them in the name of Muhammad and Islam, he is unwilling to go do it himself. Followers of Choudary and other followers of Islam, does it ever occur to you that your leaders are so willing to sacrifice your life, but not their own? That should cause you to stop and think about what they are telling you.
Geller, though, not only condemned Islam and Choudary for its bigotry and violence, but also Barack Obama. She reached out to the FBI for security due to the nature of the Islamic State's threat being an Islamic terror in nature. She has not received any help from the Muslim sympathizing administration. No surprise there.