Sure enough if, for example, we look at Jake Sullivan, on the 2022 membership list he was serving as the US National Security Advisor and was listed as a “former” member. Yet, on the current list he has full membership as a “recent” former member, i.e., he’s not a “former” member anymore.
I’m not sure how long Triliateralists remain “recent former” members but, if we look at the 2020 list, Ken Juster for instance was a “former” member serving as the US Ambassador to India. On the current list he has transitioned through the “recent former” designation phase to become a regular member again. So, it seems the flimflam is maintained for no more than 4 years after a Trilateralist’s so-called “public service ceases.”
Evidently, Patrick Wood is correct. His current listing as a former member indicates that Keir Starmer has not resigned from the Trilateral Commission. If we assume he is a serving Trilateralist this raises a number of very serious questions.
The Trilateral Commission – founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller – effectively promotes multipolarity. It divides the northern hemisphere into three distinct regions or poles: North American, European and Asian Pacific. This is practically identical to the regionalised “balance of power” system envisaged by the Rhodes/Milner influenced Anglo-American Establishment prior to WWII.
This theme of regionalisation was pursued by the Rockefellers in the post-war period. In the late 1950’s they determined that the “regional approach has world-wide validity” and that they should “contribute to this [regionalisation] process by constructive action.” The Trilateral Commission was established with that objective, among others, in mind.
It is no coincidence that 1973 was also the year that the Rockefellers’ and European Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (“OECD’s”) global think-tank, the Club of Rome, published its report proposing a multipolar (regionalised) world titled ‘Regionalised and Adaptive Model of the Global World System’ (“RAM”).
While the RAM report presents a computer model, that divided the world into ten “Kingdoms” – poles – The Club of Rome added a vision statement:
Our efforts in the immediate future will be concentrated on further use of the already developed [Kingdoms] model. [. . .] Implementation of the regional models in different parts of the world and their connection via a satellite communication network [will be] for the purpose of joint assessment of the long-term global future by teams from the various regions [Kingdoms or “poles”]. Implementation of the vision for the future outlined by leaders from an underdeveloped region in order to assess with the model existing obstacles and the means whereby the [multi-kingdom or multipolar] vision might become a reality.
More recently the World Economic Forum (“WEF”), founded by Klaus Schwab, has argued the “most likely outcome along the globalisation–no globalisation continuum lies in an in-between solution: regionalisation.” The global push toward regionalisation – multipolarity – has been ongoing for more than a century. It is the penultimate step before full-blown global governance: the ultimate objective.
Membership of the Trilateral Commission would suggest Starmer is a participant in a privately funded think-tank which exercises the Chatham House rule and deliberates on globalist policy initiatives in secret. Because it meets behind closed doors – virtual or physical – we are reliant on its published reports and released documents to piece together what those discussions entailed. It isn’t particularly difficult to do so.
The Trilateral Commission’s Task Force on Global Capitalism in Transition seeks to “chart a path” for “governments, businesses and non-profit institutions and [define] specific steps they can take to achieve critical common goals.”
No comments:
Post a Comment