Saturday, November 30, 2024

UNESCO study reveals misinformation crisis among social media influencers


UNESCO study reveals misinformation crisis among social media influencers



In a world where social media influencers hold significant sway over public opinion, a recent study by UNESCO has raised alarming concerns about the prevalence of misinformation among these digital creators. The report highlights that a staggering 62 percent of influencers do not fact-check the content they share, which poses a serious threat to public trust and discourse.

Understanding the study

Conducted in August and September 2024, the UNESCO study surveyed 500 influencers from 45 countries, all with a minimum of 1,000 followers. The findings reveal a troubling trend: while 37 percent of influencers occasionally consult fact-checking websites, many rely on subjective measures such as a source’s popularity or recommendations from friends. This lack of rigorous verification can lead to the spread of false information, which can have far-reaching consequences.


Influencers’ role in shaping public perception

The implications of this study are particularly concerning given that nearly 40 percent of young Americans aged 18 to 29 regularly receive their news from influencers, according to a Pew Research Center study. Unlike trained journalists, many influencers depend on personal experiences or trending topics as their primary sources of information. Notably, 42 percent of surveyed influencers assess a source’s credibility based on the number of likes or views it receives, while only 17 percent prioritize documented evidence. Despite this, 69 percent believe they are promoting critical thinking and digital literacy among their audiences.

Misinformation’s real-world impact

The timing of this report is crucial, coinciding with the 2024 U.S. presidential election, where influencers played a pivotal role in disseminating information. High-profile figures like President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris utilized influencers and podcasters with large followings to connect directly with voters. However, the lack of fact-checking has real-world implications. Earlier this year, false claims about migrants in Springfield, Ohio, stealing pets went viral, leading to bomb threats and school closures, despite local officials’ efforts to debunk the rumors.

Challenges in combating misinformation

Efforts to combat misinformation have proven challenging for both governments and social media platforms. For instance, platforms like X have implemented “Community Notes” features for fact-checking but often struggle to remove false content effectively. YouTube has also banned the monetization of election-related misinformation, yet continues to profit from such videos.

More...



No comments: