We have spoken about online censorship, social media silencing content they do not approve of, Google demonetizing websites like ANP that doesn't follow the "authoritative, scientific consensus," but the 'RESTRICT act' takes things to a whole new level.
Stefan Stanford recently described the RESTRICT act, otherwise known as Senate Bill 686, as an attempt at "controlling Internet content," in order to ensure that the "never-ending stream of lies that we've been getting from the government and the mainstream media for the past several decades at least will be the ONLY information that we're 'allowed' to get."
Read Stefan's entire piece at this link, because he has a great grasp on the damage this bill, if passed by the Senate and the House, then signed into law by Joe Biden, will do to all of our abilities to get the truth rather than the "official narrative."
The so-called purpose of this bill is to protect Americans from "TikTok" (Chinese), but nowhere in the Summary, nor the Text of the bill itself, is TikTok mentioned, which should be a huge red flag for anyone reading the bill.
In this piece we will delved into the text of the bill, the co-sponsors of the bill, where it stands at the moment, and more.
The RESTRICT act, aka S.686, will be embedded below for readers to see for themselves how dangerous this is for truth speakers and those looking for the truth rather than the official MSM/Biden regime narrative.
I am going to highlight some issues that jumped out at me while reading through the full text of the bill, and encourage readers to tells us in the comments below, what jumped out at them as dangerous.
The very first line states "To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to review and prohibit certain transactions between persons in the United States and foreign adversaries, and for other purposes."
1 comment:
It is about preventing any organized resistance to what evil has planned for humanity. Just one more step closer to the mark.
Post a Comment