EU Globalists Threaten to Dump $2.34 Trillion in U.S. Debt to Stop Trump’s Ukraine Peace Deal

EU Globalists Threaten to Dump $2.34 Trillion in U.S. Debt to Stop Trump’s Ukraine Peace Deal

Robert Semonsen

The EU’s pro-war, globalist, anti-American leaders are doing everything in their power—including weighing what’s being called a “nuclear option” of deliberately shaking the foundations of the U.S. economy—to block a peace settlement in Ukraine, even as President Trump advances direct negotiations aimed at finally ending the nearly four-year-long inter-Slavic war.

According to reports, the globalist bloc in Europe is threatening to sell-off $2.34 trillion in US Treasury holdings if Trump withdraws support for Ukraine—an action that some analysts claim could  trigger a downturn more severe than the 2008 crash.

Recently, behind closed doors, American and Ukrainian delegations met again in Miami, signaling Washington’s renewed push for a peace settlement instead of endless military escalation and the unending flow of cash into what many see as the black pit of corruption within the Ukrainian government.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio joined Trump’s Russia envoy Steve Witkoff and adviser Jared Kushner for the talks. Trump said afterward there is “a real shot at a deal,” reinforcing his long-held promise to stop the war before it spirals further.

Europe’s entrenched ruling class—deeply unpopular at home while increasingly irrelevant geopolitically— however, is panicking at the idea of peace breaking out on terms they and their globalist backers cannot control. Brussels and Berlin fear Trump may reset relations with Moscow and sideline the EU, which has spent years posturing as the moral authority of the Western alliance.

According to reports, one European intelligence service distributed internal memos warning that Trump’s outreach to Russia could upend NATO’s preferred strategy. These documents accuse Washington of considering commercial cooperation with Moscow—something Europe once embraced before its own sanctions backfired.

Rather than welcoming diplomacy, EU officials are allegedly weighing economic retaliation if Trump dares to end the war on his own terms. Sources say some governments have floated the idea of dumping portions of their massive holdings of U.S. debt as a form of pressure.

Such a move would be a dramatic escalation—essentially an attempt to destabilize the American economy to keep the Ukraine conflict alive. Analysts note this financial “nuclear option” could send shockwaves through global markets and severely devalue the dollar.

European technocrats appear willing to risk worldwide turmoil to preserve their geopolitical ambitions. Their threat reflects how far the EU has drifted from serving its citizens and how committed it remains to endless confrontation with Russia.

EU officials fear losing both influence and leverage should peace be restored under Trump’s leadership. As midterm elections approach in the U.S., Brussels hopes its threats will intimidate Washington into maintaining the status quo.

Terry James: Unusual Signs In The Heavens

Prophetic Stellar Signals

Terry James

People throughout the world have been reporting the strange lights from the heavens for millennia. The ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, and most every other civilization and culture have recorded sightings that are unusual.

However, today, an increasing number of anomalous sightings is reported nearly every hour of every day. Many are recorded with and through the ever-improving technologies for catching the UFOs, now called “unidentified aerial phenomena” (UAPs).

The 1947 reports of a crashed extraterrestrial flying disc at Roswell, New Mexico, opened the modern world to setting the stage for what has come since. The movie industry has greatly expanded public awareness of and fascination with the things from “out there” somewhere.

From the 1952 film The Day the Earth Stood Still to the Star Trek TV series and movies and the Star Wars franchise of films, ET, and others to all the recent US governmental probing into all things extraterrestrial, the strange things taking place in the heavens are front and center in the headlines today. Gary Ritter’s and my series of novels beginning with The Rapture Dialogues (hope you will consider getting them on Amazon) is meant to lay out developments in past and coming stellar prophecy unfolding.

One such front-and-center report of things appearing in the skies is presented in the following:

The Mysterious Interstellar Object Appears to Be Pulsing in a “Heartbeat Pattern”

The pattern is repeating every 16 hours.

The mysterious interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is just weeks away from reaching its closest point to Earth: it’s expected to pass within just 170 million miles of our home planet on December 19, giving astronomers an unprecedented opportunity to take a closer look as it whizzes past.....

As Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb points out in a new blog post, they’ll be building on intriguing existing observations from ground telescopes — including a paper published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics in October by a team of researchers in Europe and Africa that found signs that it’s radiating a “heartbeat” pulse of light that repeats every 16.16 hours.

While that may sound like an intriguing new fold in Loeb’s longstanding efforts to support the theory that the object could be an extraterrestrial spacecraft visiting the solar system, there’s likely a much more mundane explanation: that it’s spinning, pulsing us with light like an interstellar lighthouse.…

We recently looked at the following prophecy given by Jesus:

And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring. (Luke 21:25–28)

We previously dealt with the latter part of the prophecy–“nations in distress, with perplexity” and “the sea and the waves roaring.” We looked at all the rioting among the peoples of the US and other tumultuous cities of the planet, and at how the people seem to have been given over to the “reprobate mind” of Romans 1:28.

Now we examine the first part of Christ’s prophecy—”And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars” (Luke 21:25a).

Jesus said that as the time of His return to establish His millennial kingdom on earth nears, there would be unusual signs in the heavens.

With reports such as the one above and many others, even if just considering that we now have the technological capability to record them, the words of the Lord certainly ring true. There are indeed “signs in the sun, moon, and stars.”

Undoubtedly, we’ve only begun to see this particular signal of the coming Tribulation and the return of the King of Kings. Such signs will almost certainly increase in the days and nights just ahead.

As I’ve said on many occasions, I believe the reports of the strange sights in the skies are prophetic. They are the warnings Jesus gave. I believe they’re setting the stage for when the False Prophet (Revelation chapter 13) calls down fire from Heaven in the sight of the image of the Beast.

More...

Genocide In Nigeria

The Genocide Of Christians In Nigeria

There’s a genocide happening in Nigeria. While this may sound sensationalized, it’s a sober reality backed by years of data, eyewitness testimony, and independent documentation.

While Christians are being slaughtered, abducted, and displaced, another war has just begun. It’s a war of propaganda intent on convincing the world that nothing out of the ordinary is happening.

I’ve personally walked through ravaged villages in Nigeria’s Middle Belt, and I’ve seen the grief this denial causes.

Two of the most visible voices in that campaign emerged this month. African Union Commission Chairperson Mahmoud Ali Youssouf told reporters flatly that “there is no genocide in northern Nigeria.” Days earlier, on “The Tucker Carlson Show,” attorney Bob Amsterdam, who was introduced as a defender of persecuted Christians, claimed that the crisis was “more tribal than religious.” Carlson nodded along, giving him airtime to minimize one of the world’s gravest humanitarian catastrophes.

Neither man mentioned that Amsterdam previously represented Nasir El-Rufai, the former governor of Kaduna State, whose administration presided over a pattern of lockdowns and massacres that left Christian villages defenseless against Fulani militant attacks. Under El-Rufai’s rule, entire communities such as Goska were burned on Christmas Eve while government restrictions prevented residents from fleeing.

These are just a few among many who deny the devastating conditions in Nigeria. Denial is the ammunition fueling this war of propaganda, and when it’s perpetuated by those in power, it becomes even more difficult to discover the truth.

The data makes the case. The International Society for Civil Liberties and Rule of Law (Intersociety) reports that more than 52,000 Christians have been killed in Nigeria since 2009, including over 7,000 in just the first seven months of 2025. More than 18,000 believers have been abducted, and at least 20,000 churches and Christian schools have been burned or destroyed. Open Doors International ranks Nigeria seventh on its 2025 World Watch List, warning that “jihadist violence continues to escalate” and that Christians “are particularly at risk from targeted attacks by Islamist militants.” These statistics paint a gruesome picture of the orchestrated campaign to eradicate Nigeria’s Christian community.

The perpetrators have said as much. Boko Haram’s late leader Abubakar Shekau openly vowed, “We will kill every Christian in the area.” His successors in ISIS-West Africa and radical Fulani militias continue to act on that pledge. The group times their raids for Christian gatherings, shouting “Allahu Akbar,” killing men, raping women, abducting children, and burning churches. This is targeted religious cleansing carried out with chilling consistency.

In Nigeria’s Middle Belt states (Plateau, Benue, and Southern Kaduna), the pattern is unmistakable. Militias descend on Christian farming villages at night, torch homes, and slaughter families. Survivors often return to find their farmland seized and their churches reduced to ash. Amnesty International describes a “mounting death toll amid unchecked attacks by armed groups.” The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom continues to designate Nigeria a Country of Particular Concern for “systematic, ongoing and egregious” violations of religious freedom (USCIRF, July 2025).

Yet voices like Youssouf’s and Amsterdam’s insist this is something else. They describe it as “complex,” “tribal,” “shared.” It’s a narrative designed to protect the powerful: Nigerian officials who have failed to defend Christian citizens, Western governments that prefer strategic silence, and media figures who mistake contrarianism for courage. Their rhetoric is meticulously crafted to conceal the truth and keep the world in a bubble of ignorance.

The facts on the ground are brutal. Earlier this year, at least 40 people in the Zike community, a group of Christian farmers, were killed by Fulani herdsmen who had their sights set on the Zike’s land resources.

In June 2023, coordinated Fulani militia attacks swept through villages in Plateau State, leaving more than 150 Christians dead and hundreds of homes reduced to ash. Entire communities were wiped out in a single night, while security forces never arrived.

In 2022, Deborah Yakubu, a Christian college student, was stoned by classmates after being accused of “blasphemy” on WhatsApp. Her killers walked away free. Twelve northern states still enforce blasphemy laws that can carry a death sentence, and Christians live in daily fear of mobs.

Under the U.N. Genocide Convention, genocide means acts committed “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.” Nigeria meets that definition. Christians are targeted for their faith, their communities obliterated, their worship outlawed by terror. The government’s paralysis — and, at times, hostility — completes the picture.

It’s not a stretch to call this genocide. Rejecting that term, as Youssouf and Amsterdam have done, is moral blindness. When influential voices repeat the fiction that this is merely “tribal conflict,” they give killers the one thing they crave most: the world’s indifference.

Qatar, Turkey, and a deal undone:

Qatar, Turkey, and a deal undone: How Doha, Ankara are taking over Trump’s Gaza plan

Rabbi Pesach Wolicki

The Gaza plan championed by the Trump administration is on the verge of being hijacked – not by Israel, but by the very states that have spent years arming, financing, and glorifying Hamas. At the Doha Forum, Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey dispensed with diplomatic subtleties and openly demanded changes that would render the entire plan meaningless. Their proposed “revisions” would force an Israeli withdrawal before Hamas disarms, insert an international force that refuses to confront Hamas, and hard-wire Hamas’s continued rule into the future of Gaza.

The astonishing part is not that Qatar and Turkey are attempting this maneuver – it is that Washington is allowing it. The US is ignoring the plainly anti-Western ideological motives of its supposed partners, and in doing so, it is sleepwalking into a strategic catastrophe.

The speeches delivered in Doha could not have been more transparent. Qatar’s prime minister announced that mediators must “force the next phase” of the plan and insisted a ceasefire “cannot be completed unless there is a full withdrawal of the Israeli forces.” Egypt’s foreign minister echoed the line, accusing Israel of breaking the ceasefire and demanding that an International Stabilization Force deploy immediately – not to restrain Hamas, but to restrain Israel. Both stressed that the ISF should deploy on the Israeli side of the “yellow line.”

Meanwhile, Turkey declared that the transition to a Gaza governance system must precede Hamas disarmament. Hamas, never one to miss the joke, reiterated that it will only give up its weapons to a new Palestinian government. In other words, they would give their weapons to themselves, and pretend they aren’t Hamas anymore.

What these leaders are proposing is not a small modification. It is a total inversion of the 20-point plan Israel actually signed. The deal’s sequencing is explicit: Hamas is removed and disarmed first; stability is established second. Once these steps have been carried out, the ISF enters the Strip, and Israel gradually withdraws its forces “based on standards, milestones, and timeframes linked to demilitarization.” Doha now wants the opposite: withdrawal first, international force second, and Hamas disarmament… never.

This is where Washington’s strategic failure becomes glaring. For years, American policymakers have clung to the fantasy that Qatar and Turkey are “moderating influences,” countries that can rein in extremist groups. This is willful blindness. Qatar and Turkey do not moderate extremists – they sponsor them. They do not want a stable, demilitarized Gaza – they want a Gaza in which the Muslim Brotherhood retains its foothold.

This ideological reality is not hidden. Qatar shelters Hamas leadership, glorifies Hamas on Al Jazeera, and bankrolls Muslim Brotherhood movements across the region. Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, praises Hamas as “freedom fighters,” calls for Israel’s destruction, and funnels support to Brotherhood-aligned groups everywhere. Both regimes view the Muslim Brotherhood not as a threat but as the engine of their regional vision.

And yet, American policymakers continue to treat them as if they were the UAE or Saudi Arabia – responsible actors who seek a more moderate Islam that cooperates with Western interests.

This is not naivete: It is negligence.

The consequences are unfolding in real time. While Jordan, Pakistan, and Indonesia are backing away from participating in the ISF, Turkey is lobbying aggressively to insert its military into Gaza. This is not out of altruism or a desire to secure peace. Ankara wants a permanent presence on Israel’s southern border for the same reason it seized influence over Israel’s northern border through its Syrian proxy, Ahmed Al-Sharaa: regional hegemony. A Turkish-led ISF in Gaza would give Turkey long-term strategic leverage over Israel – and an opportunity, down the road, to empower Hamas under the veneer of international legitimacy.

Meanwhile, Qatar is working around the clock to push the process into “the next stage” before Hamas is disarmed – because a premature transition is precisely what guarantees Hamas’s survival. Qatar knows perfectly well that once an international force is positioned between Israel and Hamas-controlled territory, Israeli military action will become all but impossible. Hamas would emerge battered but unbroken, shielded by foreign troops and diplomatic pressure, ready to rebuild under the watchful eyes of its patrons in Doha and Ankara.

And yet, Washington still refuses to say the obvious: Qatar and Turkey are not partners in security – they are partners in Hamas’s survival.

This is why the upcoming Netanyahu–Trump meeting is so critical. Turkey is counting on President Donald Trump to pressure Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into allowing Turkish troops into Gaza. Netanyahu has already said flatly that “there will be no Turkish troops deployed in Gaza.” He must hold that line with absolute firmness. Allowing Turkish participation in the ISF would be a strategic calamity of generational proportions.

If the Trump administration truly wants its Gaza plan to succeed, it must stop allowing Qatar and Turkey to dictate the terms. Instead, it should turn to the regional actors who genuinely oppose the Muslim Brotherhood and genuinely seek stability: the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and others who have repeatedly designated the Brotherhood – and by extension Hamas – as terrorists. These are the states that genuinely seek a less radicalized, more pro-Western Middle East.

“Scripted Reality”

“Scripted Reality” And Predictive Programming

Ramon Tomey

• Predictive programming is a deliberate strategy used in cinema and media to condition public acceptance of future policies, technologies and social changes by introducing them first as fictional concepts.
• Its methods include soft disclosure, normalization and cultural conditioning, making shocking ideas feel familiar, inevitable and normal through repeated exposure in entertainment.
• The link between Hollywood and globalist institutions is documented, with organizations like the RAND Corporation and the Council on Foreign Relations using films as tools to shape geopolitical narratives and public opinion.
• Historical examples show a pattern of “fiction” preceding reality, such as The Manchurian Candidate and mind control experiments (MKUltra) or Network and modern media consolidation, suggesting these are rehearsals, not coincidences.
• Awareness and critical viewing are the antidotes; by recognizing patterns, questioning narratives and sharing insights, the public can break the spell of manipulation and resist conditioned acceptance.

Imagine sitting in a dark theater, popcorn in hand, as the screen flickers to life. You’re there to escape – to laugh, to cry, to feel. But what if the story unfolding before you isn’t just entertainment? What if it’s a carefully crafted message designed not just to reflect the world, but to shape it?

This is the unsettling reality of predictive programming, a deliberate strategy woven into cinema and media to condition public perception long before policies, technologies, or social shifts become reality. Dennis Schultz’s “Scripted Reality: The Hidden Hand of Cinema and the Art of Predictive Programming” elaborates on this subtle tactic.

Predictive programming isn’t new. Its origins trace back to psychological warfare experiments in the early 20th century, when governments realized that controlling beliefs was more effective than brute force. During World War II, films like Frank Capra’s “Why We Fight” series weren’t just propaganda – they were blueprints for selling war to a reluctant public. By the Cold War, Hollywood had evolved into a testing ground for controversial ideas.

From screen to society: How entertainment shapes reality

To understand predictive programming, we must define key tactics:

• Soft disclosure: Gradually introducing shocking ideas through entertainment, making them feel familiar by the time they appear in real life. “Minority Report” (2002) normalized pre-crime policing, while “Contagion” (2011) primed audiences for pandemic lockdowns years before COVID-19.
• Normalization: Making the unthinkable seem ordinary. “Gattaca” (1997) framed genetic discrimination as inevitable; “Black Mirror” episodes about social credit systems now feel eerily prescient as China punishes dissenters with digital scoring.
• Cultural conditioning: Slowly reshaping societal values. Notice how nearly every modern blockbuster includes interracial couples or LGBTQ characters – not for organic storytelling, but to redefine family structures and social norms.

The connection between Hollywood and globalist institutions isn’t conspiracy – it’s documented. Defense contractor RAND Corporation openly studied how media narratives shape public opinion. Its 2001 report explored using films to “educate” the masses on military interventions and domestic policies.

The key is pattern recognition. When George Orwell’s “1984” warned of mass surveillance in 1949, it was fiction – but by the time “Enemy of the State” (1998) depicted National Security Agency-style spying, the infrastructure was already being built. When “V for Vendetta” (2005) showed a government fabricating a virus to justify tyranny, it was a dress rehearsal for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

Repetition is critical: The mere exposure effect means the more we’re exposed to an idea, the more acceptable it becomes. That’s why themes like pandemics, artificial intelligence overlords and social credit systems appear across decades of films. It’s not creativity—it’s conditioning.

Predictive programming only works if audiences remain passive. But once you see the pattern, you can’t unsee it. Watch films critically, and ask the following questions:

• Why is this theme appearing now?
• Who benefits from this narrative?
• What are they preparing us to accept?

More....