Wednesday, July 29, 2026

Trump says US will ‘hit Iran hard’ after overnight attack


 Times of Israel is liveblogging Wednesday


US President Donald Trump says Washington is going to “beat the ------- ----” out of Iran in response to Tehran’s overnight attacks on US assets in the region.

“We’ll be hitting them hard. They’re going to get a beating,” Trump tells Fox News in a phone interview.

Trump calls the Iran strike targeting US forces in Jordan a “surprise attack” in which troops had just minutes to shoot down incoming missiles.

Commenting on the US-Saudi strikes against pro-Iranian militia groups in Iraq, Trump says they were coordinated with the Iraqi government. He calls the pro-Iranian militia groups a “cancer on the world.”

Despite the apparent escalation with Iran, Trump says he’s going to allow his negotiators to continue holding talks with Iran.

Asked about his meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump reiterates that it went very well, adding that the Israeli premier “understands now,” without elaborating as to what he meant.


Israel accuses Hezbollah of breaking Lebanon truce with drone attack



The military confirms an unmanned engineering vehicle was struck overnight by a Hezbollah explosive drone in the Ali Taher Ridge area of southern Lebanon, in the IDF’s buffer zone.

The attack on the armored bulldozer, the first since the start of the framework agreement between Israel and Lebanon in late June, caused no injuries, according to the army.

“This is a blatant violation of the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon by the Hezbollah terror organization,” the IDF says.

Israel is currently deliberating a response to the violation of the ceasefire, according to security officials.

Israel says Hezbollah has a massive underground complex under the Ali Taher Ridge, near Nabatieh, and the IDF estimates that dozens of operatives are holed up in the area.

However, because of the ceasefire agreement, the IDF is prevented from capturing the underground passages beneath the ridge.

The army says forces “continue to operate in the ridge area and will not allow terrorists in the area to advance or carry out terror attacks against IDF troops.”


Guided by Iran, Houthis may start charging for passage through Red Sea strait

Yemen’s Houthi group is considering imposing fees on commercial ships sailing through the southern Red Sea, a week after declaring a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, regional sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.

The Iran-aligned Houthis on July 20 declared a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia, opening a new front against the US and its allies in the Iran war and expanding attacks on tankers carrying global energy and other supplies to waters beyond the Gulf.

The Houthis were looking into imposing fees on most traffic through the narrow Bab el-Mandeb gateway, which links the southern Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden, the sources say. No timeframe was given at this stage for implementation, they added.

The Houthis’ media office did not respond to a request for comment.

Houthi officials traveled to Iran in July for the funeral ceremony of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, where Iranian counterparts discussed with them the issue of imposing fees on Bab el-Mandeb transits, two regional officials briefed by Tehran tell Reuters.

The objectives of such a move would be to normalize the practice of imposing fees on international waterways and increase pressure on the United States, the sources say. Chinese ships would be exempted from such fees and the Houthis were supportive of the arrangement, they add.

Houthi officials who returned by plane from Tehran were accompanied by Iranian advisers who were on the ground to guide them on setting up a potential authority that will regulate fees through the Bab el-Mandeb, an Arab official in the region says.

“The Houthis will try to gain access over the Red Sea and they will try to charge ships if they do,” Afrah al-Zouba, foreign minister-designate with Yemen’s internationally recognized government, tells Reuters.

Such a move would face strong opposition from Gulf and European countries, although overstretched international naval forces are currently unable to provide sufficient protection for merchant shipping and there is little political appetite to change that, two Western

Israel won’t agree to more southern Lebanon withdrawals in Rome talks — report

Israel has told mediators that it will not agree to additional withdrawals from territory in southern Lebanon in Rome talks scheduled for next week, Channel 12 reports.

Israel’s focus in Rome will be on maintaining the freedom to re-enter areas it handed over to the Lebanese army last week, should it need to deal with Hezbollah threats, according to the report. Israel won’t agree to withdraw from any more territory without that agreement on freedom of action.

Last month’s deal called for the Lebanese military to deploy in areas in southern Lebanon where the Hezbollah terror group had a military presence and influence, paving the way for Israel to withdraw from its declared security zone in the south, dependent on Hezbollah disarmament.

Until Hezbollah is disarmed, Israel also won’t agree to any future withdrawals at all south of the so-called “yellow line” it established marking the Israeli buffer zone in southern Lebanon, according to the report.

“The additional areas will not be on our side, in the defense lines that we have stabilized,” says an Israeli official. “If the current pilot is successful and additional pilot areas are decided upon later, they will be beyond the yellow line. We will not allow further withdrawals of the area on our side. Until Hezbollah is disarmed in Lebanon –- that is what was agreed upon.”

Technical teams from each side will meet from August 4 to August 6 and focus on advancing the implementation of the framework agreement for an eventual peace deal between Israel and Lebanon.

IDF says it destroyed Hezbollah command tunnel near UNIFIL post

China in talks with Houthis to let its tankers through Red Sea strait


Dehumanizing, False Promises Of Marxist Economics


The Dehumanizing, False Promises Of Marxist Economics Must Not Go Unchallenged


And now, well into the 21st century, elected officials, educators and celebrity pundits say that all people deserve free healthcare, guaranteed income and free college tuition (resulting in degrees received without any pass or fail grading). I have even read a couple of online posts in which the writers opine (I am assuming with a straight face) that, “Access to WIFI is a human right.”   

These and other unrealistic ideas have been pumped into the minds of several generations of Americans. In many a locality, policies that amount to “forced utopianism” and pipe dream “equity” have resulted in 1) An exodus of individuals and businesses who are able to leave and seek saner pastures; 2) diminished standards of life and safety for those unfortunate enough to remain; and 3) unfounded “blame” that America is “structurally racist,” and in need of reinvention.  

Nothing is wrong with America that a thorough return to Constitutional principles won’t fix. We’ve become a lawless people, restlessly demanding things that we feel we’re “owed.”   

False promises and lies of socialism: Exposed, at least, in this ministry’s content

In the summer of 2024, I debated a very liberal pastor on FOX News, a clergyman who prided himself on operating a couple of non-profits that help underprivileged people. The man denigrates “greedy capitalism” and the “lack of compassion” inherent in a free-market system that promises no guarantees except opportunity.

But I asked him how his charities were funded. “By compassionate donors,” he said. “People who actually care about the welfare of other human beings,” he went on. As if those of us against socialism necessarily don’t care about other human beings.

Whether or not this minister’s charitable endeavors are worthwhile, I don’t know. But I pointed out that his “donors” have the money to subsidize his efforts, because they are not socialists. Here is the contradiction:  Socialism needs the fruits of capitalism to fund their anti-capitalist, proposed solutions. Capitalism does not need socialism in order to work.     

Would the implementation of socialist policies and (ultimately) a Marxist government be compassionate to citizens? Consider two things that pro-socialist voices want: “Free” college tuition and “free healthcare.”  The math behind such socialist goals does not compute.

A Gospel Truth Conference attendee, in Phoenix AZ, once said, “This type of teaching is exactly what is needed in the church today; the videos and workbook are so helpful and instructive.”

If our government taxed 100% of the earnings of the wealthiest Americans (about one trillion dollars, annually) even this would not wipe out all student loan debt (over 1.3 trillion dollars). What about Medicare? Every penny the wealthiest Americans will make over the next 12 months (again, roughly one trillion dollars) wouldn’t keep Medicare going even for three years. 

And still, nothing is left to fund “guaranteed basic income for all,” and other seemingly endless government programs socialists demand must be started.

Socialism/communism? Not in the Bible

Younger Christians today have been told that early Christians practiced socialism. This is false; the charity practiced by first-century believers was voluntary. It was based on the love of God, whereas socialist/Marxist regimes are inherently godless and generally suppress religious freedom.

Further, regarding the largesse (groups of people who won’t work, which in socialist societies is well documented), God’s Word warns that if a man won’t work, he shouldn’t be given free food (2 Thessalonians 3:10). For those who try and argue that Christianity is somehow compatible with socialism, hard economic facts, history, and the Bible say differently.

The ideas of socialism have been planted into the consciousness of many Americans — even some Christians. Shocking numbers of young adults now indicate a favorable view of Marxist ideas. The dehumanizing, false promises of Marxist economics must not go unchallenged. 

It is imperative that such indoctrination be answered, and our publishing and broadcasting efforts critique socialism factually and effectively. In addition to the saving of souls, I believe that the church today must engage in the changing of minds and empower people to effectively respond to this destructive philosophy.



How The Most ‘Informed’ Generation In Human History Also Became The Most Susceptible To Deception


How The Most ‘Informed’ Generation In Human History Also Became The Most Susceptible To Deception


We live in the most informed generation in human history, yet many would argue we are also the most confused. Never before has so much information been available with just the touch of a screen. Every minute, millions of videos are uploaded, articles are published, opinions are shared, and headlines race around the world before most people have even finished breakfast.

Ironically, as information has exploded, confidence in what is actually true has steadily declined.

That presents a serious problem, not merely for society, but for every follower of Jesus Christ.

The battle for truth has become one of the defining spiritual conflicts of our generation.

A World Drowning in Information

Many Americans consume news through social media, online videos, podcasts, streaming platforms, and digital news feeds. Traditional newspapers and nightly television broadcasts no longer dominate public conversation. Instead, algorithms determine much of what people see.

The result is an information ecosystem unlike anything previous generations experienced.

Stories compete for clicks instead of accuracy. Emotion often triumphs over evidence. Opinion is frequently presented as fact. Breaking news is reported before facts have been verified. Corrections, when they come, rarely receive the same attention as the original story and the pressure to be first has often replaced the responsibility to be accurate. This environment creates fertile ground for confusion.

The Rise of Competing Narratives

Today’s challenge is not simply misinformation. It is the existence of competing versions of reality. Two people can watch the same event unfold and walk away believing entirely different things because they consumed different sources of information. Political events. International conflicts. Economic reports. Scientific debates. Either observed through the lens of a Christian worldview or through secular humanism.

The Prophetic Importance of Truth

The Bible repeatedly warns that deception will characterize the last days. Jesus Himself cautioned His disciples: “Take heed that no one deceives you.”(Matthew 24:4) Notice His first warning regarding the end times was not war. Not famine. Not earthquakes. It was deception.

Later He added: “For false christs and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.” (Matthew 24:24)

The Apostle Paul echoed the same concern: “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine… and they will turn their ears away from the truth.” (2 Timothy 4:3–4)

The Bible consistently connects the end times with an increasing rejection of objective truth.

Truth will not simply be ignored. It will be replaced.

Technology Has Accelerated the Battle

Artificial intelligence now produces realistic images, convincing videos, cloned voices, and entirely fabricated interviews. Deepfake technology continues to improve at astonishing speed.

Soon it may become nearly impossible for the average person to distinguish authentic recordings from manufactured ones. While these technologies have beneficial applications, they also create unprecedented opportunities for manipulation.

Imagine political speeches that never occurred. Military announcements that were never made.

Financial panic triggered by fabricated videos. Religious leaders appear to endorse positions they never actually held. Technology already exists. As it improves, discernment becomes increasingly essential.

The Coming Age of Global Deception

Bible prophecy points toward a future world leader who exercises extraordinary influence over the nations. The false prophet performs signs that persuade the world to follow the beast.

Whether these signs involve supernatural power, technological deception, or a combination of both, Scripture makes one point unmistakably clear: The world will believe lies.

Paul writes concerning those who reject God’s truth: “…they did not receive the love of the truth… And for this reason, God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie” (2 Thessalonians 2:10–11). Notice the progression. Reject truth. Accept deception. Believe the lie.

That sequence should be understood by every believer.

Why Christians Must Be Different

Followers of Christ should never become careless consumers of information. Truth is not determined by popularity. It is not determined by political affiliation. It is not determined by social media engagement. Truth is determined by God. Christ declared: “Your word is truth” (John 17:17). Jesus also proclaimed: “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6).

Christian discernment begins with Scripture—not headlines.

Testing Everything

Paul instructed believers: “Test all things; hold fast what is good.” (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

That command applies remarkably well to today’s media environment. Before sharing a story, believers should ask: Is this information verified? What evidence supports it? Are multiple credible sources reporting the same facts? Is important context being omitted? Does this appeal primarily to fear or outrage? Am I reacting emotionally rather than thoughtfully? Christians should be known not for spreading sensational claims but for demonstrating wisdom, patience, and integrity.

The Danger of Living in Echo Chambers

Modern technology allows people to hear only voices that reinforce what they already believe.

Algorithms learn our preferences and continue feeding us similar content. Over time, individuals can become isolated from differing viewpoints and convinced that everyone agrees with them.

This environment encourages confirmation bias instead of careful investigation. Followers of Christ should resist becoming captive to any echo chamber, whether political, cultural, or religious. Our loyalty belongs first to Christ and His Word.

Truth Requires Courage

Standing for truth has never been easy. The prophets faced opposition. The apostles were imprisoned. Jesus was rejected. Truth has always carried a cost. As society increasingly embraces subjective morality and relative truth, Christians should expect greater pressure to compromise biblical convictions.

Scripture reminds us: “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).

Freedom is not found in manipulating truth. Freedom is found in embracing it.

Living as Watchmen

Bible prophecy students often focus on identifying signs of the times. This is important.

Jesus commanded us to watch. But watching involves more than observing world events.

It requires guarding our hearts against deception. The greatest threat is not merely believing false information about politics or economics. It is believing falsehood about God. The closer we draw to the return of Christ, the more valuable discernment becomes. Believers should become people whose minds are shaped more by Scripture than by social media, more by prayer than by podcasts, and more by the Holy Spirit than by public opinion.

Final Thoughts

We cannot control every headline. We cannot eliminate every false report. We cannot prevent deception from spreading throughout the world. But we can choose where we anchor our lives.

Cultures change. Governments rise and fall. Media narratives shift daily. Technology advances at breathtaking speed. Yet one thing remains unchanged: “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever.” (Isaiah 40:8) In an age where many no longer know whom to trust, Christians have the privilege of pointing the world to the One who never changes.

​Because when truth becomes optional, deception becomes inevitable. But when God’s Word remains our foundation, even the greatest storms of confusion cannot move us.


US Central Command and Saudi Arabian Forces Conduct Strikes Against Iran-Backed Forces in Iraq in Response to ‘Surprise’ Attack on US Base


US Central Command and Saudi Arabian Forces Conduct Strikes Against Iran-Backed Forces in Iraq in Response to ‘Surprise’ Attack on US Base


US Central Command on Tuesday evening announced joint US-Saudi strikes against Iran-backed forces in Iraq in response to a surprise attack on a US base.

Full statement from CENTCOM:

U.S. Central Command and the Saudi Arabian Armed Forces conducted precision strikes in Iraq, July 28, against Iran-aligned terrorists that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) directed to attack U.S. forces and Saudi energy infrastructure. 

U.S. and Saudi fighter aircraft struck multiple terrorist logistics and weapons sites across eastern Iraq in a strong response to over 30 IRGC-directed aerial drone attacks in the last 72 hours.

The unwarranted attacks against U.S. forces were not successful. 

From February through April 2026, there were more than 600 attempted attacks on U.S. citizens and facilities by Iran-aligned terrorist militias in Iraq. 

The IRGC and its terrorist proxies must cease these attacks to avoid further U.S. military response.


Earlier Tuesday, Iran launched a missile strike on US forces in the Middle East on Tuesday in what US Central Command described as a “attempted surprise attack.”

All of the missiles were intercepted, CENTCOM says.

This comes after President Trump called off the nearly two-week-long bombing campaign against Iran to continue negotiations on Friday.

“At 5:45 p.m. ET today, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces launched multiple ballistic missiles from Iran in an attempted surprise attack on U.S. forces based in the Middle East. All Iranian missiles were successfully intercepted. U.S. forces remain vigilant and at a high state of readiness,” US Central Command announced in a statement.

18 US service members have been killed in action in the Middle East since the beginning of the war against Iran.

President Trump last Wednesday attended the dignified transfer of the four American patriots killed in action in the Middle East by Iranian drones.

War Updates: Russia preparing one of the largest aerial strike packages of the war, with Kiev as the likely target.



Establishment Gloats Over Ukraine’s Pivot to Civilian Targets, as Putin’s Rhetoric Heats Up


Again the MSM has caught up in the slipstream of our analysis.

The current geopolitical cue revolves around Ukraine’s putative pivot from strikes on Russia’s refineries to an all-out war against “Russia’s Amazon”:

After months of escalating attacks on oil depots and refineries, it has abruptly shifted targets, turning its sights to something more unexpected: warehouses and depots belonging to Wildberries, a Russian retail giant often described as the country’s equivalent of Amazon.

But the biggest bombshell is what they now openly admit to.

The above Telegraph piece veritably gloats over the fact that these strikes are having a major effect on Russia’s civilian population and its perception of the conflict.

But the strikes have another effect.

Robert Brovdi, Ukraine’s drone chief, said the strikes were aimed at destroying the “illusion of a comfortable, well-fed peacetime life enjoyed by the obedient biomass of an aggressor country”.

The damage is impossible to hide.

They show that Russia is vulnerable.


After only briefly and passingly mentioning that some “radios and military gear” are available on the Wildberries site, the authors quickly abandon that line of justification in favor of obsessively cataloguing the civilian toll the strikes are exacting:

The destruction of its warehouses has sent a shock wave through the small businesses selling goods through the site. Hundreds of people have posted videos online complaining that they had lost large inventories of goods and would not receive compensation from the company.

So, it’s not the “military radios” they really care about, it’s the “shock waves” sent through small businesses the article authors are salivating over in the hopes that it will result in mass unrest against Putin.

They end the piece by verbalizing these hopes outright, and proving that Zelensky’s pivot to hitting Russian retailers has nothing whatever to do with paralyzing the army’s ability to buy some kind of radios or armor—as if the Russian Army purchases its gear from Wildberries—but rather everything to do with pressuring Russian citizens, as is the standard M.O. of all failed imperial “kinetic” foreign policy:


One of the more interesting current discussions about Russia’s response to these Ukrainian provocations revolves around the theory that Putin has slowly been forced to change his approach to the war due to the increasing pressure from his own General Staff and security apparatus.

In truth, we can’t know for certain the ‘chicken-or-the-egg’ causal chain of the shift, but we do know this shift in tone and rhetoric is real. Just yesterday Putin told a conference that Ukraine will certainly lose its western territories:

He then went on to liken the attackers of Russian cargo ships to pirates, and told his naval command to begin treating them as one would treat pirates:

It still had the hallmarks of Putinism: the strict legalistic adherence; “framework of international maritime law”, etc. But the tone shift is obvious: “Decisive action” must be taken against these pirates, says Putin.

Even more notably, at his latest speech Putin told the audience a “secret”, that one of the Russian SMO medal winners whispered to Putin that Russia should “go harder” in the war, to which Putin responds: “I really want to.”

This is intriguingly revealing. On one hand, Putin openly gives the reasons for why the Russian Army cannot go “all out” as most people would like: because it would incur much greater losses, and Putin believes Russia’s current persistent slow-march across Ukraine is the ideal pace which maximizes victorious conditions while minimizing losses.

But the fact that he even brings it up and stages it in a kind of dialectic with the Russian people is intriguing in and of itself, because it represents Putin’s response to what is clearly becoming a growing call from society. Putin uses the soldier’s request as a chance to finally address this elephant in the room while acquitting himself of guilt by framing it as something Putin himself wishes he could do, but is not capable of doing for the given justifications.

Now Zelensky has continued agitating about Russia facing a crisis related to the above, with growing rumors—fanned by Ukraine—that a large-scale mobilization is imminent after Russian Duma elections in the fall. Zelensky himself has claimed upwards of 50,000 North Korean troops are getting readied to be “mobilized” into the Russian Armed Forces, while Putin will call up an additional 500k Russian troops.

More....