Tuesday, March 17, 2026

6.0 Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Cuba


6.0 Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Cuba Less Than 24 Hours After Country’s Power Grid Shut Off


An earthquake struck off the coast of Cuba in the early hours of Tuesday morning.

Reuters reported the European ​Mediterranean Seismological Centre measured the earthquake at a 6.0 magnitude.

However, the United States Geological Survey USGS measured the earthquake as having a lower magnitude of 5.8.


A 5.8-magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of Cuba early on Tuesday (17 March), the United States Geological Survey (USGS) said.

There were no immediate reports of damage.

The quake hit at a depth of 11.6 kilometres about 49 kilometres south-southwest of the port of Maisi at 12:28am (0428 GMT), according to the USGS.

The USGS put the alert level for shaking-related fatalities and economic losses at green, meaning “low likelihood for casualties and damage”. The towns of Imias and San Antonio del Sur may have experienced moderate shaking, the USGS added.

The earthquake came less than 24 hours after Cuba’s entire power grid faced a widespread outage.

The U.S. Embassy in Cuba reported, “At 1:54 p.m. local time, there was a disconnection of the national electrical grid resulting in a complete power outage across Cuba, which includes the Havana metropolitan area.”

In recent weeks, President Trump has revealed that Cuba is in the process of falling under communist rule.

On Monday afternoon, while speaking to the press inside the Oval Office, the 47th President went a bit further and shared, “I do believe I’ll be…having the honour of taking Cuba.”

WATCH:








Top Iranian official, commander killed in strike, Israel defense minister says


Top Iranian official, commander killed in strike, Israel defense minister


Iranian Supreme National Security Council secretary Ali Larijani and Basij Commander Gholamreza Soleimani have both been killed, according to the Israel Defense Forces and Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz.

"I have just been updated by the Chief of Staff that Larijani, Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and the head of the Basij — Iran’s central repression apparatus — Salimani, were eliminated last night and have joined Khamenei, the head of the annihilation program, along with all those eliminated from the axis of evil in the depths of hell," Katz said, according to a translation provided to Fox News by his office.

The news comes more than two weeks since Israel launched a war against the Islamic Republic of Iranin conjunction with U.S. President Donald Trump.

"Ali Larijani, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council and the regime’s effective leader, has been eliminated," the Israel Defense Forces noted in a post on X.

"Throughout the years, Larijani was considered one of the most veteran and senior figures within the Iranian regime leadership, and was a close associate of the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. During the most recent wave of protests against the Iranian terror regime, Larijani personally oversaw the massacre that was carried out against Iranian protestors," the post added.

Another IDF post noted, "Yesterday, the IDF targeted & eliminated Gholamreza Soleimani, who operated as commander of the Basij unit for the past 6 years. Under Soleimani, the Basij unit led the main repression operations in Iran, employing severe violence, widespread arrests, and the use of force against civilian demonstrators."

The U.S. government had previously indicated that it would offer a reward for information on Larijani.

"Rewards for Justice is offering a reward of up to $10 million for information on the key leaders of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its component branches," rewardsforjustice.net notes. "Under this reward offer, RFJ is seeking information on the following individuals," the webpage notes, listing Larijani and others.

"Over a dozen Basij officials were targeted in Iran last night in different strikes, including the head of the Basij forces Gholamreza Soleimani. This was a joint U.S. and Israeli effort," a senior Israeli official noted. "A strike in Tehran targeted the Basij commander and around a dozen others, including the most senior figures in the Basij forces—people with a lot of blood on their hands."

Why Support For Israel Is Fading In America


A Dangerous Trend: Why Support For Israel Is Fading In America
 PNW STAFF


The numbers are sobering, and for many Christians who have long viewed support for Israel as both a moral and biblical conviction, they are deeply troubling.

In the months following the Hamas terrorist attacks of October 7, 2023, there was an immediate surge of sympathy for Israel across the United States. Americans watched in horror as terrorists murdered civilians, kidnapped families, and unleashed the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. For a brief moment, the moral clarity seemed obvious.

But that moment has faded.

Today, new polling suggests that American attitudes toward Israel are undergoing a historic transformation--and the shift is being driven largely by younger voters, Democrats, and independents.

According to recent polling from Gallup, Americans are now slightly more likely to sympathize with Palestinians than with Israelis--41% to 36%--marking the first time in more than two decades of polling that Israel has trailed in overall sympathy.

For decades, Israel consistently enjoyed a strong advantage in American public opinion. That era may now be ending.

The most dramatic change has taken place inside the Democratic Party.

Polling from Pew Research Center shows that negative views of Israel among Americans have risen significantly in recent years, with 53% of Americans now holding an unfavorable opinion of Israel, up from 42% just three years earlier.

But the numbers inside the Democratic Party are even more striking.

Among Democrats, 69% now view Israel unfavorably, compared with 53% only a few years ago.

The divide between Republicans and Democrats on Israel has become one of the largest partisan gaps in foreign policy polling.

Meanwhile, Democrats are increasingly sympathetic toward Palestinians by overwhelming margins, with surveys showing Democrats siding with Palestinians over Israelis by nearly three-to-one in some polling.

This shift is not simply a reaction to a single war. It reflects a broader ideological change that has been building for years within progressive politics.

In many activist circles today, Israel is framed not as a democratic ally but as a "settler colonial state," an accusation that has spread through campus activism, academic institutions, and political advocacy groups.

The Generational Divide

If the partisan divide is stark, the generational divide is even more dramatic.

Younger Americans now hold views toward Israel that are radically different from older generations.

A Gallup survey found that 53% of Americans ages 18-34 now sympathize more with Palestinians, compared with only 23% who sympathize more with Israelis.

By contrast, older Americans remain strongly supportive of Israel.

Among Americans over 55, roughly half still sympathize more with Israel than with Palestinians.

This is not a minor demographic difference--it represents a fundamental generational realignment.

And because younger voters eventually become the dominant electorate, the long-term implications are profound.

The Power of Social Media Narratives

One major factor driving this shift is the transformation of the information ecosystem.

Younger Americans increasingly get their news from short-form social media platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube.

These platforms tend to amplify emotionally powerful content--particularly images of war, destruction, and civilian suffering.

In the context of the Gaza war, this environment has created an overwhelming stream of content portraying Israel primarily through images of devastation, often with little historical context about Hamas terrorism, Israeli security threats, or the complexities of the conflict.

For many young viewers, this content becomes their primary understanding of the Middle East.

And once those narratives take root, they are reinforced by activist influencers who command millions of followers online.

Universities and Cultural Institutions

Universities have also played a major role in shaping younger Americans' views.

Since October 7, campuses across the United States have seen:

pro-Palestinian encampments

anti-Israel protests

faculty activism

divestment campaigns

While the participants represent a small percentage of the population, the cultural influence of universities remains enormous.

Ideas that once existed primarily in academic theory--such as framing Israel through "colonialism" narratives--are now widespread among younger political activists.

New Anti-Israel Voices on the Right

While most of the decline in support for Israel has come from the political left, there are also emerging shifts on the right.

Some influential commentators have begun criticizing Israel or questioning America's alliance with the country.

This includes voices within the populist conservative movement who advocate a more isolationist foreign policy.

Polling suggests that younger conservatives are less uniformly supportive of Israel than older Republicans.

Even so, Republicans remain far more supportive of Israel overall than Democrats.

The End of the Bipartisan Consensus

For most of the past half-century, support for Israel was one of the rare issues in Washington that enjoyed bipartisan agreement.

Democrats and Republicans alike viewed Israel as:

a democratic ally

a strategic partner

a nation fighting terrorism in a dangerous region

That consensus is now fracturing.

Polling consistently shows that American views on Israel are increasingly divided by party, ideology, and age.

And once foreign policy becomes deeply polarized, restoring consensus becomes far more difficult.


A Warning for Christians

For many Christians, support for Israel is not merely geopolitical--it is also spiritual.

Scripture repeatedly affirms the enduring significance of the Jewish people and the land of Israel in God's unfolding plan for history.

Yet as American culture becomes increasingly secular, biblical literacy continues to decline.

Many younger Americans are now forming opinions about Israel without any understanding of:

the historical Jewish connection to the land

the security threats Israel faces

or the biblical roots that have shaped Western support for the Jewish state.

The result is a cultural environment where misinformation spreads easily and historical memory fades quickly.

The Moment for Clarity

None of this means support for Israel in America is disappearing overnight.

Older Americans, evangelical Christians, and many conservatives remain strongly supportive of Israel.

But the trend lines are unmistakable.

If current patterns continue, the alliance between the United States and Israel may eventually become just another partisan political issue.

For Christians who believe the Bible calls believers to stand with the Jewish people and pray for the peace of Jerusalem, the challenge is clear.

In an age of confusion, misinformation, and cultural hostility, silence is not an option.

Truth must be spoken.

History must be remembered.

And the moral clarity that briefly emerged on October 7 must not be allowed to disappear.





Peter Thiel Brings Antichrist Lectures To Rome - Where Is The Church?


Peter Thiel Brings Antichrist Lectures To Rome - Where Is The Church?
PNW STAFF



One of the most talked-about events in Rome's intellectual circles this month is the arrival of Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, delivering his controversial lecture series on the Antichrist. Following a successful run in San Francisco, Thiel has brought his exploration of one of Christianity's most enigmatic and feared figures to the heart of Catholic Europe. The lectures, running from Sunday through Wednesday, have sparked both curiosity and criticism, as Catholic universities and organizations have quickly distanced themselves from any official endorsement.

Thiel is no stranger to controversy. Co-founder of PayPal and Palantir Technologies, the data-mining firm assisting U.S. immigration enforcement, Thiel has long been a figure at the intersection of technology, politics, and culture. He was an early supporter of Vice President JD Vance and has cultivated a public persona that blends libertarian politics, technological futurism, and philosophical curiosity. 

Among the topics that draw him most is the Antichrist -- the prophesied figure in Scripture who opposes Christ -- and the broader narrative of Armageddon. In a November essay for the Catholic magazine First Things, Thiel pondered the perennial questions: "Who is the Antichrist? When will he arrive? What will he preach?"

Thiel's lecture series first premiered in San Francisco last September to packed halls and fervent attention from tech and intellectual circles. Attendees were drawn not just by the sensational topic but also by Thiel's unique approach: combining theology, literature, philosophy, and contemporary politics with insights from historical thinkers like René Girard, Francis Bacon, Jonathan Swift, Carl Schmitt, and John Henry Newman. One promotional note from San Francisco promised discussions "anchored on science and technology" yet steeped in theological and historical reflection.

The Rome iteration follows the same blueprint. Though organized independently by the Vincenzo Gioberti Cultural Association and the Cluny Institute at the Catholic University of America, it retains the invitation-only format and a focus on deep intellectual engagement. The lectures are expected to touch on the Antichrist's role in human history, the moral and technological dangers of the modern age, and the implications of global political shifts.

Thiel and the Antichrist: Biblical Accuracy or Modern Curiosity?

While Thiel's interest in the Antichrist is intense, it raises questions about alignment with Biblical teaching. Scripturally, the Antichrist is a figure who will deny Christ, oppose God's law, and lead many astray in the end times (1 John 2:18, 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, Revelation 13). Thiel's concerns about deception, moral decay, and the rise of global powers that act against Christian values resonate with Biblical warnings. 

Yet there is an irony that Thiel, an openly gay man whose personal life does not conform to traditional Biblical teaching, has become a public promoter of understanding the Antichrist. Some critics argue this tension underscores the need for discernment: the messenger may not always model the moral clarity of the message.

Adding to the contemporary relevance, speculation about the Antichrist has surged worldwide. In certain Shiite Muslim circles, former President Donald Trump has been the subject of conjecture as a potential end-times figure. For Christians, such speculation underscores the importance of understanding Scripture rather than relying on rumor or political projection.

Catholic vs. Evangelical Perspectives

Thiel's decision to lecture in Rome is particularly intriguing given the Catholic understanding of the Antichrist. Catholic theology views the Antichrist as both a present and future reality, often emphasizing a more symbolic and spiritual interpretation. Some Catholic scholars see the Antichrist not necessarily as one literal person but as a manifestation of systemic evil and opposition to Christ throughout history.

Evangelical and Protestant traditions, in contrast, generally emphasize a literal, end-times figure whose arrival is imminent and whose actions will be dramatic and unmistakable. According to Revelation 13 and 2 Thessalonians 2, the Antichrist will consolidate political and economic power, perform signs and wonders, and deceive many with persuasive lies. Evangelicals also stress the importance of prophecy and Scripture as a guide to recognizing this figure when he appears.

Key Biblical characteristics of the Antichrist include:

Denial of Christ and opposition to God (1 John 2:22)

Deception of the masses (Matthew 24:24)

Political and economic control (Revelation 13:7-8)

Blasphemy and self-exaltation (2 Thessalonians 2:4)

By these standards, the evangelical lens emphasizes vigilance, scriptural literacy, and a personal faith anchored in Christ as the antidote to deception.

Understanding the Times

The timing of Thiel's lectures may be more than coincidental. Global unrest, political polarization, and religious speculation have created fertile ground for interest in end-times prophecy. While Thiel's approach is unorthodox and sometimes ironic given his personal life, it underscores a broader point: Christians must study Scripture diligently to discern truth from conjecture. The Antichrist, according to the Bible, will seek to deceive, and only by knowing God's Word can believers recognize the signs and remain steadfast.

In a world increasingly dominated by technology, globalist politics, and cultural shifts, the lessons of Thiel's lectures -- whether fully aligned with Scripture or not -- serve as a reminder: the battle between good and evil is not merely theoretical. Awareness, discernment, and knowledge of God's Word remain the essential defense against deception. The arrival of the Antichrist, whether near or distant, is a clarion call for Christians to be vigilant, grounded, and spiritually prepared.

Equally important is the role of churches and pastors in this conversation. The teaching of end-times prophecy is not just a niche topic for intellectuals or commentators -- it is a vital aspect of biblical instruction. Christian leaders must courageously speak up, guide their congregations with scriptural truth, and ensure that the narrative of the Antichrist and the last days is taught according to the Bible rather than being shaped primarily by outsiders, political figures, or sensational speculation. 

When the platform is left open to popular voices with their own agendas, believers risk confusion and deception; faithful shepherds have a duty to illuminate the path with God's Word.  In light of today's current events people are hungry and looking for answers.  Will the church answer the call?








Iran launches overnight missile barrages across Israel; IDF strikes Beirut and Tehran


Iran launches overnight missile barrages across Israel; IDF strikes Beirut and Tehran


After evening launches on Monday, Iran fired missiles at 1 a.m. toward northern Israel and again at 3:30 a.m. toward central Israel and the West Bank. No casualties were reported and no damage was recorded.

Sirens were also activated in northern communities following launches by Hezbollah from Lebanon, with no injuries or damage in those incidents. At the same time, the Israeli military carried out overnight strikes in Tehran and Beirut.


Meanwhile, advisers to U.S. President Donald Trump briefed him on possible “off-ramps” from the war, while also outlining escalation options if the administration chooses to increase pressure on the regime. 

According to NBC, advisers and allies are pulling Trump in different directions: those favoring an exit strategy are concerned about the global economic impact, while others are focused on the opportunity to weaken the regime’s regional influence. The timeline for the war “could change every day,” one official said.

Overnight, Iran continued attacks against Gulf states, particularly the United Arab Emirates, which has since reopened its airspace after a temporary closure.

The Palestinian Foreign Ministry reported the death of Alaa Mushtaha, a Palestinian woman who was wounded yesterday morning by an Iranian missile while driving in the Al-Bahia area of the UAE. The Palestinian Authority expressed anger over what it described as “Iranian aggression against Arab states.”

The U.S. Embassy in Iraq’s capital, Baghdad, came under a combined attack involving rockets and drones, described as the most intense since the war with Iran began. Security sources told Reuters that a suicide drone struck near the embassy, with smoke seen rising from the area.

At the same time, four people were killed in a missile strike on a house in Baghdad where pro-Iranian militia members and reportedly “Iranian advisers” were present.
Operations at the United Arab Emirates’ Shah gas field remained suspended on Tuesday following a drone attack, while a separate attack caused a fire in the Fujairah Oil Industry Zone.
No injuries were reported in either incident, local media offices said.
Meanwhile, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said Tuesday that an unknown projectile struck a tanker 23 nautical miles east of Fujairah, causing minor structural damage.
Monday’s attack on the Shah field, located about 180 km (111.85 miles) southwest of Abu Dhabi and one of the world’s largest sour gas fields, adds to disruptions in the UAE’s energy sector.
The country’s daily oil output is down by more than half since the conflict began, with the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz forcing state oil giant ADNOC to implement widespread production shut-ins, two sources told Reuters.
Oil loading operations at the UAE’s port of Fujairah, a key export terminal, were suspended twice in recent days following separate drone attacks, although some loading has since resumed, sources said.
Gulf Arab states, including the UAE, have faced more than 2,000 missile and drone attacks since the start of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran on February 28, targeting U.S. diplomatic missions and military bases, as well as oil infrastructure, ports, airports, and residential and commercial buildings.