Friday, July 24, 2026

Widespread Conflicts Are Disrupting The World Economy, Setting The Stage For Mass Food Shortages


We are living through WWIII, and sleepwalking into a holocaust, as our economic system teeters


In a special broadcast on X, Alex Jones declared that humanity is “sleepwalking into a holocaust,” arguing that the current global instability was orchestrated long ago. From Ukraine to the Middle East, Jones claimed that the conflicts were planned years in advance, and that the truth about U.S. involvement in all these countries and the subsequent sabotage and destabilization of global shipping lanes, critical resources, and energy supplies is being deliberately concealed from the American public.

Meanwhile, top Russian insider Victor Bout has raised the alarm that widespread conflicts are already disrupting the world economy, setting the stage for mass food shortages. Bout warned that populations could face starvation by fall or winter, compounding the risks of what Jones described as a premeditated catastrophe.

The wars reshaping today's globalist framework, from Eastern Europe to the Middle East, are not just political and military crises. They are food crises - the kind that leave people to starve and die - and the evidence suggests the world's agricultural systems are far more fragile, and far more exposed to distant conflict, than most consumers realize. In developed nations, expensive energy and groceries are the only thing holding back famine - for now.


Key points:

  • More than 295 million people across 53 countries and territories faced acute hunger in 2024, an increase of nearly 14 million over 2023.
  • Conflict, economic shocks, climate extremes, and displacement are the primary drivers of rising global hunger.
  • The war in Ukraine disrupted global wheat, maize, sunflower oil, and fertilizer exports, exposing how dependent the world is on a handful of suppliers.
  • Tensions around the Strait of Hormuz threaten oil, gas, and fertilizer supplies critical to modern farming.
  • FAO officials warn that even short delays in fertilizer delivery can permanently reduce harvests, since crop calendars cannot be paused.
  • Rising energy costs, not just crop shortages, are driving up food prices worldwide.
  • African nations face disproportionate risk due to smaller shipment sizes and higher transport costs.
  • Experts call for regenerative agriculture, diversified crops, and reduced dependence on fragile global supply chains, but it might be too little, too late.


The Global Report on Food Crises found that more than 295 million people across 53 countries and territories faced acute hunger in 2024, a jump of nearly 14 million compared with the year before. The World Food Program points to conflict, economic instability, climate extremes, and mass displacement as the driving forces, and the countries already struggling with poverty and weak economies are absorbing the worst of it.

Ukraine's war offered a preview of just how interconnected, and how brittle, the global food system really is. Ukraine has long ranked among the world's top exporters of wheat, maize, and sunflower oil, while Russia supplies much of the world's fertilizer and agricultural inputs. 

When Black Sea trade routes were disrupted, food and fertilizer prices spiked far beyond the region, hitting farmers and grocery shoppers who had never heard of the ports in question. Markets have since stabilized to a degree, with inflation becoming commonplace, but the underlying vulnerability, a handful of countries controlling staple food and input supplies, remains unresolved.

A similar warning is now coming out of the Middle East, where instability around the Strait of Hormuz threatens the flow of oil, natural gas, and fertilizer. Since modern agriculture runs on fuel and synthetic fertilizer, any prolonged disruption there ripples straight into farm output.

Speaking at a ministerial meeting on food security and fertilizer access, FAO Director-General Qu Dongyu framed the stakes plainly. "This is not only a geopolitical crisis, but also a disruption at the core of the global agrifood system," he said, adding that agriculture follows a rigid biological calendar. "Agriculture operates on a crop calendar that cannot be postponed. Fertilizers must be applied at specific moments in the crop cycle. If they do not arrive on time, yields are reduced, regardless of what happens later." According to Dongyu, delays of just a few weeks could tighten food supplies through 2026 and 2027, driving prices higher across import-dependent regions in Africa and Asia.


More...


Legal Weapon Against Sovereignty: The UN’s Global Climate Change Mandate


Legal Weapon Against Sovereignty: The UN’s Global Climate Change Mandate Has All The Characteristics Of A Scam



Reports about the death of climate alarmism have been greatly exaggerated. In fact, obeying United Nations climate decrees is now officially “international law.” At least that is what two key UN entities and more than 140 national governments would like humanity to believe.

In one of the most consequential developments yet for the global climate movement, the UN General Assembly voted to formally endorse and “operationalize” a 2025 ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) declaring that governments are legally obligated to combat climate change.

Supporters hailed the move as a historic victory for “climate justice.” Critics blasted it as a brazen assault on national sovereignty, self-government, affordable energy, and constitutional government.

The major UN move came even as U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration were stepping up their war on the “climate change” machine. But the U.S. government’s vigorous opposition was not enough to stop the UN’s power grab.

In one of its most breathtaking rulings, the ICJ — also known as the “World Court” or “World Supreme Court” — ruled July 23, 2025 that all governments have a legal duty to protect “human rights” and fight “global warming” by restricting emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2). Officially, it was “advisory.” But on May 20 this year, the governments of the world, acting through the UN, voted to give it real force.

Among other elements, the new resolution charges the UN boss with advancing “compliance” with the court’s controversial decision. It also purports to interfere with the sovereign authority of governments to set their own policies on issues such as energy, the environment, and even immigration, multiple governments warned.

The UN chief was enthusiastic about it, though. “The world’s highest court has spoken,” gushed UN Secretary-General António Guterres, a longtime Socialist Party operative. “Today, the General Assembly has answered.”

In a May 20 statement welcoming the General Assembly vote, Guterres described its resolution as “a powerful affirmation of international law, climate justice, science and the responsibility of states to protect people from the escalating climate crisis.”

Critics argued that the vote, which passed with 141 governments and tyrants in favor versus eight against and 28 abstentions, represents yet another brazen power grab by globalist forces. The UN General Assembly, or UNGA, has been described by top UN officials as the “Parliament of Humanity.”

The UN resolution seeks to transform the opinion of the so-called World Supreme Court into a de facto legal weapon against national sovereignty, hydrocarbon energy, economic freedom, and, ultimately, human prosperity, opponents argued.

Multiple critics have pointed out that this goes far beyond environmental policy. Instead, it is a frontal assault on self-government dressed up in the language of international law and human rights.

The legal foundation to criminally prosecute those who refuse to play along with the climate narrative is being laid down rapidly through these measures. Indeed, the resolution treats the ICJ opinion as “irrefutably authoritative and as setting out binding obligations on States,” warned U.S. officials.

Among those forcefully opposing the UN General Assembly measure was the Trump administration on behalf of the American people. U.S. taxpayers are by far the largest financiers of the UN, even though the outfit consistently works against the rights and interests of Americans.

“Throughout the negotiation of this resolution, the United States has been consistent in conveying our opposition to this initiative,” argued Ambassador Tammy Bruce, deputy U.S. representative to the UN. “The United States did not support seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on climate change and has many concerns about the Court’s opinion.”

President Yuji Iwasawa painted an apocalyptic picture: Man-made global warming is supposedly an “existential problem of planetary proportions” imperiling “all forms of life.” States must “cooperate” to meet emission targets, phase out “fossil fuels,” and provide “climate justice” reparations to poorer nations, Iwasawa and other members of the court declared.

In comments delivered ahead of the General Assembly vote, Ambassador Bruce highlighted some of the problems the U.S. government saw with the resolution and the World Court ruling.

“In brief, this resolution is highly problematic in calling on States to comply with so-called ‘obligations’ that are based on non-binding conclusions of the Court on which UN Member States’ views diverge,” she said. “The resolution includes inappropriate political demands relating to fossil fuels and on other climate topics, and we believe there is no basis for the resolution’s mandate to the Secretary-General to report on the complex and nuanced legal issues addressed by the Court.”

Several other governments expressed similar concerns, Bruce said.

Specifically, the UN resolution and the ICJ ruling claim that all governments have obligations that would “impermissibly interfere with each States’ [sic] sovereign rights to regulate and manage its own energy policy,” Bruce continued. The UN resolution also pretends that “peoples,” rather than individuals, have “human rights,” she noted.

The ICJ climate case — pushed by Pacific Island governments such as Vanuatu with heavy UN backing — was billed as the most significant ever before the court. One analyst said it was tantamount to putting the entire industrialized world on trial.

The ruling was designed from the outset to provide legal cover for the entire UN climate regime, including the 2015 Paris Agreement, and to arm activists, nongovernmental organizations, and foreign governments with tools to harass energy producers and sovereign nations, analysts observed.

“Failure of a state [government] to take appropriate action to protect the climate system … may constitute an internationally wrongful act,” ICJ President Iwasawa said, making clear that the climate movement ultimately intends to use global “authorities” to impose its agenda on humanity by force.

The court echoed that view in its unanimous, 500-page opinion. “Failure of the state to take appropriate action to protect the climate system from [greenhouse gas] emissions including through fossil fuel production, fossil fuel consumption, the granting of fossil fuel exploration licenses, or the provision of fossil fuel subsidies may constitute an internationally wrongful act,” the court warned, a clear threat.

More...


Trump Suggests Restarting Yemen Bombing Campaign After Houthi Red Sea Blockade


Trump Suggests Restarting Yemen Bombing Campaign After Houthi Red Sea Blockade


President Trump on Tuesday suggested he might restart a bombing campaign in Yemen in response to a Red Sea blockade imposed by Ansar Allah, the group commonly known as the Houthis, according to a report from Antiwar.com.

The suggestion follows Ansar Allah’s announcement of a maritime blockade on Saudi Arabia, a move that came one week after Saudi warplanes bombed Sanaa International Airport on July 13. The airstrike prevented a Yemeni delegation from landing and enforced a long-standing Saudi blockade on Yemen that was eased under a 2022 ceasefire but never fully lifted. In response to the Houthi warning, Reuters reported that two oil tankers carrying Saudi crude bound for China and India made U-turns in the Red Sea, while Yemeni media said a total of six ships altered course. [3]


Speaking to reporters at the White House alongside Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Trump downplayed the blockade’s immediate impact. “So far, it hasn’t happened, might happen, but we take care of things,” Trump said, according to the Antiwar.com report. “If something like that happens, we take care of it. You know, we’ve done that with the Houthis before, and we haven’t heard from them in a while since we did what we did originally.” [3]

Ansar Allah had already warned shipping companies against using Saudi ports before the blockade was announced on July 20. The group’s military spokesman, Yahya Saree, stated the blockade was a direct response to the Saudi bombing of Sanaa airport and the kingdom’s continued restrictions on Yemeni ports. [4]

Trump launched a bombing campaign against Ansar Allah on March 15, 2025, days after the group renewed its blockade of Israeli-linked shipping in the Red Sea. The Houthis cited Israel’s violation of the January 2025 Gaza ceasefire deal, which included imposing a full blockade on Gaza, as the trigger for their renewed attacks. [1]

The U.S. campaign lasted about six weeks and ended with a ceasefire on May 6, 2025, after failing to stop Ansar Allah’s attacks on Israeli-linked ships and missile strikes on Israel. [3]

Former President Biden also conducted a bombing campaign against the Houthis from January 2024 to January 2025 that did not halt the blockade on Israeli shipping. The Yemeni attacks only paused after the Gaza ceasefire deal took effect. [3]


The 2025 U.S. bombing campaign caused significant civilian casualties, according to the monitoring group Airwars. Airwars documented more than 250 civilian deaths in Yemen, including 84 killed in a strike on the Ras Issa Fuel Port in Hodeidah, all civilians. [3]

Another strike on a migrant detention facility in Saada on April 28, 2025, killed 68 African migrants. Amnesty International has called for the attack to be investigated as a potential war crime. [5]

The United States also backed a Saudi-UAE war against Ansar Allah from 2015 to 2022 that killed hundreds of thousands of Yemenis, including many children who starved under a blockade, but that campaign failed to restore the former internationally recognized government. [3]


As of July 21, 2026, Ansar Allah’s blockade on Saudi Arabia remains in effect, with ships heeding warnings to avoid Saudi ports, according to Reuters and Yemeni media. [3]

Trump’s suggestion of a renewed bombing campaign signals a potential escalation, though previous U.S. military action against Ansar Allah failed to achieve its stated objectives of ending maritime disruptions. The Biden administration’s campaign also failed to permanently halt the group’s attacks. [3]

No official announcement of a new military operation has been made by the White House or Pentagon as of this report.

Trump’s remarks come amid heightened tensions in the Red Sea and broader Middle East. Ansar Allah imposed its blockade on Saudi Arabia in retaliation for Saudi strikes on Yemen’s Sanaa airport, which occurred with Trump’s reported green light to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. [6]

The United States has now conducted two bombing campaigns against the Houthis under Trump and Biden, both of which failed to permanently end the group’s ability to disrupt maritime trade routes. [3]

The situation remains fluid, with regional actors continuing military actions and global trade routes facing ongoing disruption.


Thursday, July 23, 2026

Russia Striking Hard at Ukrainian-Bound Cargo Ships, Halting Odessa Region Ports’ Operations


POWDER KEG BLACK SEA: Russia Is Striking Hard at Ukrainian-Bound Cargo Ships, Halting Odessa Region Ports’ Operations


There’s no denying that Ukraine’s deep strikes into Russian infrastructure and the campaign against shadow fleet tankers are causing real problems for Russia.

But the effects of these strikes are always much exaggerated in the media, since Reuters itself has just reported that Russian budget revenues from the oil and gas sector in July increased by approximately 60% compared to the previous year.

It’s also been reported that Chinese refineries have been buying Russian oil.

In the meantime, the renewed strike campaign by Russian forces against cargo ships bound for Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea are throttling Kiev’s exports.

Worse – reports say no vessels are entering any Ukrainian ports in the Odesa region for the first time since the start of the war.

Shipping to Ukrainian ports stopped completely — Ukraine's Minister of Agrarian Policy All vessels have decided to stop calling at Ukrainian ports amid Russian strikes The losses are estimated at $2 billion a month, since 80% of all Ukrainian exports go through those ports

Of course, in the MSM, when Kiev strikes Russian ships it’s a triumph, but when Moscow strikes Ukrainian-bound ships it’s treated as a despicable, criminal behavior.

Politico reported:

“’Russia is holding global food security hostage. Today zero vessels passed through Ukraine’s Black Sea maritime corridor — right at peak harvest. This is deliberate economic and humanitarian terror’, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said in an evening statement on Wednesday.

‘Just as Iran targeted energy routes in the Strait of Hormuz, Russia is now targeting global food markets in the Black Sea. Millions of families across Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America may face rising prices and hunger if this terror continues’, Sybiha added.”

Global shipping firm Maersk stopped operations at the Odesa region ports this week, redirecting cargo to Romania’s Constanta Port.

“During the night of July 23, the Russian Armed Forces carried out another series of coordinated strikes using air-launched precision weapons and attack drones. In the port of Odessa, the attacks hit infrastructure used to unload and store military cargo. Elsewhere in the city, a plant producing drone components and a warehouse holding completed unmanned aircraft intended for the Ukrainian military were also struck.

[…] Russian forces have regularly targeted facilities in Chernomorsk, Yuzhny, Izmail, Odessa and the Dnepro-Bug port since July 11. The targets have included berths, military cargo storage sites, fuel tanks, drone assembly facilities and vessels both at anchor and in transit.”

More...





JUST IN: US Forces Strike Iran for 13th Consecutive Night


JUST IN: US Forces Strike Iran for 13th Consecutive Night



CENTCOM launched strikes against Iran for the 13th consecutive night on Thursday.

President Trump recently said the ceasefire with Iran is over after Tehran struck vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.

“U.S. forces started another night of strikes against Iranian military targets at 6:45 p.m. ET today,” CENTCOM said.

“This is the 13th consecutive night of strikes aimed to hold Iran accountable and diminish threats from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to commercial shipping,” CENTCOM said.

Earlier Thursday, President Trump said Iran will pay for all damages done to ships, cargo or anything related.

Please let this statement serve to represent, until further notice, that from this point forth, any and all damages done to Ships, Cargo, or anything related thereto, will be paid for by Iranian Money that the United States has in its possession, and controls. 

These damages may be very substantial but, nevertheless, this is the fair and equitable thing to do. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP


On Tuesday morning, President Trump said any time Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, the US will respond by bombing one bridge or power plant:

From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP

On Tuesday night, CENTCOM struck aircraft hangars, drone storage facilities and maritime capabilities.

18 US service members have been killed in action since the beginning of the US-Iran war.

President Trump on Wednesday attended the dignified transfer of the four American patriots killed in action in the Middle East by Iranian drones.