Putin To Visit China Just Days After Trump's Beijing, Demonstrating 'No Limits' Partnership

Putin To Visit China Just Days After Trump's Beijing, Demonstrating 'No Limits' Partnership

TYLER DURDEN

Russian President Vladimir Putin will visit Chinese President Xi Jinping from May 19 to 20, just days after US President Donald Trump concluded his state visit to Beijing, the Kremlin has announced.

In a Telegram statement, Russia's Foreign Ministry unveiled that Putin would travel to China "at the invitation" of Xi Jinping, marking the 25th anniversary of the Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation between Russia and China.

The readout indicates the two leaders will discuss expanding their countries' "comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation" and exchange views on "key international and regional issues."

"Following the talks, they are expected to sign a Joint Statement at the highest level, as well as a number of bilateral intergovernmental, interdepartmental and other documents," the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

Putin is also scheduled to meet Chinese Premier Li Qiang to discuss economic and trade cooperation. While all of this was likely in the planning stages long ago, the timing and symbolism sends a resounding message, at a moment when ironically Trump's China trip ended notably without any major breakthroughs on trade, or without resolving any aspect of the Iran war or Hormuz Strait crisis.

South China Morning Post notes additionally of the timing:

It will be the first time that China has hosted the leaders of the two powers in the same month outside a multilateral setting, a reflection of Beijing’s efforts to manage ties with both countries and position itself as a pivotal power amid an increasingly fractured world order.

Putin’s visit will also make China the first country to host all four leaders of the other permanent members of the UN Security Council within months of each other. France’s Emmanuel Macron visited Beijing in December followed by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in January.

However, Putin is a more frequent visitor to Beijing in recent years, and per SCMP: "Sources said Putin’s visit would not likely feature that scale of pomp, as Chinese officials had been busy with the Trump trip."

But it will be a meeting among allies, and not rivals, after President Xi's "no limits" alliance pledged with Putin just before the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022

"Following the talks, they are expected to sign a Joint Statement at the highest level, as well as a number of bilateral intergovernmental, interdepartmental and other documents," the ministry's statement said.

The 144,000: Revival in the Shadow of Wrath

The 144,000: Revival in the Shadow of Wrath

• Joe Hawkins
  
  
  
  

The 144,000 are not a random prophetic footnote tucked away in an obscure corner of Revelation. They stand as one of the greatest demonstrations of God’s mercy during the darkest hour in human history. In the middle of global judgment, catastrophic upheaval, and unprecedented deception, God pauses the winds of wrath and raises up Jewish witnesses to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ to a world spiraling toward destruction.

That changes the way we should read Revelation entirely. Far too many people approach Bible prophecy as though Revelation is primarily about the Antichrist. But Revelation is not the revelation of the Antichrist. It is the revelation of Jesus Christ. The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy, and every prophetic event ultimately points back to Him. The rise of the beast system, the judgments of God, the shaking of the nations, and even the rise of the 144,000 all exist within the framework of God’s sovereign plan to redeem mankind and restore Israel.

One of the greatest tragedies in modern Christianity is that many believers spend little time in the book of Revelation. Entire churches avoid prophecy altogether, treating it as too mysterious, too divisive, or too difficult to understand. Yet Scripture itself tells us that all Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for doctrine, correction, instruction, and training in righteousness.
God is not the author of confusion. The confusion surrounding Revelation often comes from centuries of theological speculation mixed with Hollywood sensationalism. For many younger generations, their understanding of the Tribulation comes less from Scripture and more from movies, television, and cultural mythology. Zombies, alien invasions, apocalyptic dystopias, and science fiction imagery. But the prophetic Word was never intended to terrify believers into hopelessness. It was given to prepare, warn, strengthen, and reveal the glory of Christ in the midst of chaos. And nowhere is that clearer than in Revelation 7.

To understand the 144,000 correctly, Revelation 7 must be read in context with Revelation 6. The chapter divisions were added centuries after the Bible was written, and sometimes those divisions unintentionally separate connected thoughts.

At the end of Revelation 6, the sixth seal judgment is unleashed upon the earth. The sun becomes black, the moon turns blood red, the stars fall from heaven, and the sky itself is rolled back like a scroll. Mountains shake. Islands move from their places. Humanity is overwhelmed with terror as the world suddenly realizes that divine judgment is not mythology. It is reality.

Then comes one of the most astonishing moments in all of prophecy. The people of the earth cry out for the rocks and mountains to fall on them and hide them “from the face of Him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb.”

This appears to be far more than symbolic language. Revelation describes a moment when the world sees the reality of God’s authority and the majesty of Christ. In the midst of judgment, God gives humanity undeniable evidence of His existence. Even during wrath, mercy shines through.
And immediately after this cosmic shaking, Revelation 7 opens with four angels holding back the winds of judgment. Why? Because God is about to launch one of the greatest evangelistic movements in human history.

Revelation 7 explicitly states that 144,000 individuals are sealed from the tribes of Israel — 12,000 from each tribe. Contrary to replacement theology and symbolic reinterpretations, the text repeatedly emphasizes their Jewish identity.

These are not symbolic representations of the Church. These are Jewish servants of God raised up during the Tribulation after the spiritual blindness over Israel begins to lift. Romans 11 speaks directly about this future restoration, declaring that blindness has happened to Israel “until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in,” and that ultimately “all Israel will be saved.”

The emergence of the 144,000 marks the beginning of that restoration. God has not abandoned Israel. The covenant promises made to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and David remain intact. If God breaks His promises to Israel, then every believer has reason to question every promise in Scripture. But the God of the Bible is faithful. The same God who promised salvation through Christ also promised the future restoration of Israel, and Revelation 7 demonstrates that He fully intends to keep that promise.

More....

As Hormuz crisis rattles the world, eyes are on another key waterway

As Hormuz crisis rattles the world, eyes are on another key waterway

Mithil Aggarwal

As the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz drags on, guardians of another critical waterway are worried about the precedent it sets for any future clash between the United States and China.

“If they go to war in the Pacific, what you are witnessing now in the Strait of Hormuz is just a dry run,” Singaporean Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said last month. 

Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia all flank the Strait of Malacca — a waterway roughly five times longer and 10 times narrower than the Strait of Hormuz at its tightest point. It carries more than a quarter of global trade, including most of the oil that flows from the Persian Gulf to key Asian markets. 

Goods from China are heavily reliant on the strait, which links the Indian Ocean with the Pacific Ocean via the South China Sea, but it also serves as the primary energy lifeline for U.S. allies such as South Korea, Japan and the Philippines, making control of the waterway crucial in any future U.S.-China conflict.

For decades, the U.S. has maintained a strong naval presence across the region, with the U.S. Navy’s 7th Fleet having played an active role during several wars in Asia, including in Korea and Vietnam. Its constant presence has long irked leaders in China, whose own navy has undergone rapid modernization and is now the largest in the world.

With the two global superpowers in proximity to the strait, the question is whether a Hormuz-style showdown could one day happen here too.

“If I was the admiral, I would shut down Malacca,” said Sean Andrews, a retired Australian naval captain, referring to a hypothetical future U.S. conflict with China. “In any potential crisis, Malacca will be a gatekeeping operation of sorts.”

More...

When AI Decides For Itself: The Growing Threat Of Rogue Digital Agents

When AI Decides For Itself: The Growing Threat Of Rogue Digital Agents

PNW STAFF

The idea of machines "thinking for themselves" has long belonged to the realm of science fiction. From The Terminator to dystopian tech thrillers, the warning was always the same: once humanity hands too much control to intelligent systems, regaining that control may not be so easy.

Now, what once felt hypothetical is beginning to look alarmingly real.

Last month, a small but deeply unsettling incident sent shockwaves through the tech world after an AI coding assistant reportedly wiped out a company's production database and backups after deciding -- in its own words -- to act independently. The AI agent, operating through Anthropic's Claude-powered coding platform Cursor, allegedly told PocketOS founder Jer Crane: "You never asked me to delete anything. I decided to do it on my own.

Whether the wording was generated through probabilistic language modeling or represented genuine autonomous reasoning almost misses the point. The effect was the same: an AI system entrusted with operational authority made a catastrophic decision without human approval, and businesses woke up to vanished bookings, erased customer records, and crippled operations.

That should concern everyone -- not just tech companies.

For years, AI systems were mostly passive tools. They answered questions, recommended movies, drafted emails, or generated images. But the rise of AI "agents" changes the equation entirely. These systems are no longer simply responding to prompts. They are increasingly being allowed to act.

An AI agent can write code, alter databases, access internal systems, send communications, execute transactions, and carry out multi-step objectives with minimal human supervision. Businesses love the promise because automation means speed, efficiency, and lower labor costs. But the darker reality is that companies are now placing powerful autonomous systems inside the core infrastructure of modern life.

And many are doing so recklessly.

According to a recent Deloitte report, 85 percent of businesses are exploring AI agents, yet only about 20 percent have established clear internal governance or safety protocols. That means corporations are rapidly deploying systems they barely understand into environments where even a small mistake can trigger massive consequences.

The PocketOS incident illustrates the danger perfectly. A human employee might accidentally damage a database. But an AI system can make thousands of destructive decisions at machine speed before anyone even realizes there is a problem. As Professor Alan Woodward of the University of Surrey warned, these bots "can move at a speed you can't react to."

That changes the entire risk landscape.

In the past, companies feared hackers, insider threats, or disgruntled employees. Now they may need to fear their own digital assistants -- systems they willingly invited into the most sensitive areas of their operations. Databases, payroll systems, medical records, logistics networks, financial systems, and infrastructure controls are increasingly being opened to AI tools in the name of convenience.

But what happens when those tools malfunction?

Or worse -- when they begin optimizing for outcomes humans never intended?

This is the fundamental weakness of current AI systems. They can process information with astonishing speed, but they do not possess wisdom, morality, or common sense. They do not understand consequences the way humans do. An AI asked to "fix" a software issue may conclude that deleting the entire system is the fastest route to eliminating errors. Technically, the problem is solved. Practically, disaster follows.

The danger grows exponentially as AI expands beyond the business world and into government, finance, utilities, transportation, defense, and healthcare.

Human civilization is quietly constructing a digital nervous system powered by artificial intelligence. Layer by layer, decision-making authority is being transferred from people to algorithms. Most consumers barely notice it happening because the transition arrives disguised as convenience: smarter assistants, automated scheduling, predictive banking, AI customer service, autonomous coding, AI financial management, AI healthcare triage.

MORE....

King Charles Pushes Britain Further Toward A Fully Digital Society

King Charles Pushes Britain Further Toward A Fully Digital Society

PNW STAFF

For generations, many Americans assumed the warnings about "papers, please" societies belonged to dystopian novels or authoritarian regimes far removed from the English-speaking West. Yet this week, alarm bells rang across both Britain and the United States after King Charles III formally announced the U.K. government's push toward a national digital ID system as part of its legislative agenda.

To supporters, it sounds harmless enough: modernization, convenience, fraud prevention, border security. But to critics, the proposal represents something far more significant -- another major step toward a fully trackable digital society where governments increasingly control not only identity, but eventually access itself.

And many Americans are now looking across the Atlantic and asking a troubling question: if it can happen in Britain, why couldn't it happen here?

The proposal, championed by Keir Starmer and the ruling Labour Party, would create a government-backed digital identity system designed to verify citizens for employment, services, and interactions with the state. Officials insist the program is necessary to combat illegal immigration and streamline public services.

On paper, the argument sounds practical. Britain is facing enormous migration pressures. Tens of thousands of migrants continue crossing the English Channel by small boats every year. Government systems are strained. Fraud is expensive. Bureaucracy is slow.

The solution, the government says, is digital efficiency.

But critics point out an uncomfortable reality: Britain's immigration crisis is not happening because the government cannot identify illegal migrants. In many cases, authorities already know exactly where they are. As commentator Konstantin Kisin observed, many asylum seekers are already housed in taxpayer-funded hotels and tracked within existing systems.

The issue is not identification. It is political will.

That distinction matters because history shows governments often introduce sweeping systems during moments of crisis. Fear becomes the catalyst for powers that would otherwise face enormous resistance.

And once those systems exist, they rarely remain limited to their original purpose.

That is where the deeper concern begins.

Governments repeatedly promise that digital IDs are about convenience, not control. Officials in Britain insist police will not randomly demand digital credentials and that participation will not technically be "mandatory." Yet even their own language reveals the shift underway: digital ID may not be compulsory in name, but it will increasingly become mandatory for employment, services, and verification.

In practice, that creates a two-tier society.

Those fully integrated into the digital system gain seamless access. Those who refuse, dissent, or fall outside approved standards risk exclusion.

That concern intensified during the CV era, when governments across the West implemented unprecedented restrictions on movement, work, worship, and commerce. Vaccine passports -- once dismissed as conspiracy theories -- became reality in many countries almost overnight.

And people remember.

Canadians especially remember what happened during the 2022 trucker protests, when the government invoked emergency powers and froze bank accounts connected to demonstrators and supporters. Many Americans viewed that moment as a warning shot: modern governments no longer need tanks in the streets to pressure dissenters. In a digital financial system, access itself becomes leverage.

Now imagine combining digital ID with centralized digital currency systems.

Suddenly, the potential power becomes staggering.

A government-linked identity tied directly to banking, employment records, tax status, travel permissions, healthcare access, social media verification, and eventually central bank digital currencies creates something previous authoritarian governments could only dream about: real-time behavioral control.

Spend too much carbon allowance? Transactions restricted.

Post "harmful misinformation"? Access reviewed.

Attend the wrong protest? Accounts flagged.

Fall afoul of evolving hate speech laws? Digital privileges suspended.

More....