Friday, June 19, 2026

The Data Center Trap: AI, Digital ID & Robots Are Building the Infrastructure for Total Control


The Data Center Trap: AI, Digital ID & Robots Are Building the Infrastructure for Total Control
J Dornik


When I joined Allan and @Corri Hunsperger on Talk Truth on DoveTV, we started with the kind of simple truth that only sounds simple because our civilization has spent decades pretending it is complicated: “The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof, the world and those who dwell therein” (Psalm 24:1). That means the world does not belong to Facebook, Google, Meta, OpenAI, the federal government, the World Economic Forum, or the army of highly credentialed spreadsheet priests currently assuring us that surrendering our future to artificial intelligence is just “innovation.” Apparently, if you slap the word “smart” in front of something, we are all supposed to nod politely while the same people who cannot keep a website from crashing explain how they are going to redesign humanity.

The real issue is not simply artificial intelligence. The issue is the physical infrastructure being built to make digital control permanent. For years, Big Tech trained us to talk about “the cloud” as though our data gently floated somewhere above the earth, weightless and harmless, perhaps resting peacefully next to a Pixar character and a tasteful acoustic guitar soundtrack. In reality, the cloud is massive concrete, steel, wiring, surveillance capacity, energy demand, water consumption, and political leverage. These data centers are not neutral warehouses. They are the nervous system of the coming technocratic order.

That is why the data center boom matters. These facilities are being pitched to local communities as economic development, job creation, and national competitiveness. The salesman shows up with a smile, a promise, a tax incentive, and the kind of PowerPoint presentation that should be legally classified as a sleep aid. Then a few local officials, sometimes a tiny handful of people, approve projects that reshape the future of an entire region. The community wakes up later and discovers that the decision has already been made. Congratulations, citizen. Your input was valued so deeply that nobody asked for it.

This is where conservatives, Christians, and anyone who still believes in human liberty need to stop obsessing only over Washington, D.C. Yes, D.C. matters, usually in the same way a kitchen fire matters, but many of the most consequential decisions are being made at the county board, city council, zoning commission, and utility level. That is where these data centers get approved. That is where land gets rezoned. That is where water and electricity agreements get negotiated. That is where multinational tech interests walk into small towns and dangle enough money to make local officials forget that their first obligation is to the people who actually live there.


The push for artificial intelligence is constantly framed as a race against China. We are told that America must win the AI race or be left behind. That framing is convenient because fear makes people stupid, and stupid people sign paperwork they have not read. Yes, China is a real threat. Yes, technology matters. Yes, America should lead. But leadership without moral boundaries is just domination with better branding. If the only goal is to beat China by building the same kind of centralized surveillance architecture China perfected, then we have not defeated the dragon. We have hired it as a consultant.

The stated endgame from many of the AI elite is no longer hidden. Elon Musk has said that AI and robotics will make work optional, describing a future where traditional labor becomes unnecessary and people receive something closer to “universal high income.” Fortune reported his prediction in January 2026, including his comment that work may become optional in the way some people still grow vegetables in their backyard because they enjoy it. The billionaire class replaces your job, hands you a digital allowance, and then compares your former career to a hobby garden.


Then comes digital ID, which is the bridge between data collection and behavioral control. King Charles’ 2026 speech to Parliament included the statement that ministers would proceed with Digital ID to modernize how citizens interact with public services. That language is important because access to services becomes the justification for tying identity, records, behavior, finances, movement, and eventually permission into one centralized system. It is always introduced as convenience. It always becomes compliance.


This is why I said on Talk Truth that we are looking at the kind of technological architecture that could be used to implement what Revelation describes when it says that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark (Revelation 13:17). 


 I am not saying every data center is the mark of the beast. I am saying the infrastructure being built right now gives governments and corporations the ability to control economic participation in a way previous generations could barely imagine. Digital ID, centralized digital currency, AI surveillance, biometric recognition, social credit logic, debanking, algorithmic censorship, and private-sector UBI are not disconnected ideas. They are pieces of the same machine.

More...

Klaus Schwab’s “intelligent age”: AI will replace human cognitive abilities


Klaus Schwab’s “intelligent age”: AI will replace human cognitive abilities
Tim Hinchcliffe


Livestreaming today [29 May] at the University of Johannesburg in South Africa, Schwab spoke at length about what he calls ‘the intelligent age” and what it means for jobs, students and humanity.

Comparing previous industrial revolutions to the so-called intelligent age, the grand architect of the Great Reset agenda said that our thinking abilities were now being delegated to artificial intelligence.

“What is the Intelligent Age doing? It is replacing our cognitive capabilities by algorithm, or by what we call our artificial intelligence”—Klaus Schwab, The Intelligent Age and the Responsibility of African Leadership, May 2026

According to Schwab, the winners in this brave new world. where intelligence is delegated to algorithms. will be those who are able to adapt.

However, we shall see that adaptability, or as the German-native Schwab calls it “adaptility [sic],” will mean having enough money to be able to afford access to AI knowledge bases and know how to use them to their advantage.

“With artificial intelligence you have many more capabilities to find out what truth is. If I go today to Claude or to ChatGPT or whatever it is, if I make the necessary efforts, I can find out what the truth is”—Klaus Schwab, The Intelligent Age and the Responsibility of African Leadership,May 2026

Notice how Schwab says, “if I make the necessary efforts?” Why is that? It’s because these AI tools scrape the internet and push forward the top-ranking results.

Top ranking doesn’t always correlate with truth. The necessary efforts, therefore, are related to human research.

You can’t trust an LLM to bring you the truth because it will spit back whatever some spook had ghost-edited in Wikipedia, or what was allowed by censors at Reddit, or what information wasn’t permitted by the gatekeepers at Google and their unelected globalist partners at the United Nations (“UN”).

Nevertheless, Schwab puts his faith in AI and the big tech companies for providing all the knowledge we need.

In this scenario, universities are outdated, and according to the WEF founder, higher education should focus more on learning how to use new technologies rather than teaching actual knowledge.

“You don’t have to go to university anymore. For each knowledge question, you can go to Claude, you can go to ChatGPT or whatever. Knowledge is around us and is free of charge”—Klaus Schwab, The Intelligent Age and the Responsibility of African Leadership, May 2026


According to Schwab, we should give up our pursuit of knowledge. We should instead focus on our “capabilities.”

And what types of capabilities are those?

The capabilities to interact with a chatbot, and you should go back to university every year to get your updated certificate as if it were a subscription to be beholden to AI and big tech for life.

Schwab calls this a transition from “learning for life to lifelong learning.”

With only the elite having access to intelligence on a meter and lifelong learning, Schwab acknowledged that the WEF has long been criticised for being elitist.

However, he never actually denied being an elitist.

Instead, he doubled down on the notion that “we are part of global community,” which flies in the face of sovereign nations and of different cultural values that are not shared by a “global community.”

“Of course, the forum was very often criticised for being elite […] I was very often called the elite globalist or whatever. Globalisation should not be a philosophy or an ideology. We are part of a global community. We are globally interdependent”—Klaus Schwab, The Intelligent Age and the Responsibility of African Leadership, May 2026

More...


US says Vance not yet leaving for Switzerland, as Friday talks with Iran apparently delayed


US says Vance not yet leaving for Switzerland, as Friday talks with Iran apparently delayed



The White House indicates that the first round of technical talks with Iran under the memorandum of understanding signed this week will not take place on Friday, as Washington had initially said.

“As the vice president said at his press conference, the plans for the upcoming technical talks with Iran have not been finalized, and the US delegation has been prepared to depart at the first available opportunity,” a White House spokesperson says in a statement.

“But the logistics of these negotiations have never been simple or predictable. As of now the vice president is not departing tonight. We will let you know as soon as we have a concrete update about next steps. We look forward to beginning technical talks as soon as possible,” the statement adds.


After US officials initially told reporters that they would be meeting Iranian negotiators in Switzerland on Friday, Vance said at a Friday press conference that the meeting wasn’t yet finalized, as it’s difficult for the Iranian officials to get out of Iran. Vance said he thought he would travel to Switzerland at some point this weekend.

Thursday, June 18, 2026

Diplomatic agreements may lead to Israel-Iran escalation, former Navy commander warns


Diplomatic agreements may lead to Israel-Iran escalation, former Navy commander warns
JP

Israel must prepare for repeated rounds of fighting with Iran, former Navy commander Maj. Gen. (res.) Eliezer Marom warned in an interview with 103FM on Monday.

According to Marom, the Middle East has entered a new phase in which diplomatic agreements do not necessarily create stability, and may even lead to escalation.

Marom opened with a direct reference to the Iranian threat and the implications of emerging agreements.

"We are in a long war with Iran, and Israel needs to prepare every few months for an operation or war with Iran that will last several days or weeks. If the agreement is signed, we need to understand that and prepare for it," the former senior officer warned.

During the interview, he analyzed the emerging ceasefire agreement and its regional significance for Israel, and sharply criticized the conduct of Israel’s political leadership.

"The inner circle around the prime minister does not exist. One person is making decisions, and here even Ron Dermer, who understands America and did good things with this administration, simply left and went," he said. "He should be called up for reserve duty."

Marom also addressed diplomatic moves surrounding Lebanon, saying Israel should move diplomatically and do so quickly.

"President Trump, in what he signed last night, is approving Iran's conquest of Lebanon. Do you understand that? He is now signing an agreement with the Iranians about Lebanon. The president of Lebanon should be offended by this, and all the leaders in the Middle East who are listening to this, Sisi, Erdogan, and bin Salman, should understand that this is a bad agreement."

He later added that he sees a preferable diplomatic alternative. "The IDF recommended doing this earlier; let's move quickly toward an agreement on Lebanon, and along the way thwart Iran's taking over Lebanon. The only thing that can be done diplomatically right now is to close an agreement with the Lebanese and say that once the Lebanese Army is strong enough, we will give southern Lebanon back to it. President Aoun accepts this, and we need to move along this path," Marom said.

When asked about the possibility of escalation, he answered firmly: "And what will happen if Iran responds to every Israeli action on Lebanese soil?" "Then let there be missiles, please. This agreement is bad for us in any case. If they want to return to fighting? I hate to say it, but from Israel's perspective, this is a preferable alternative," Marom said.

More...


Vance slams Israeli ‘freakout’ over Iran deal, says Trump only world leader who still likes Israel


Vance slams Israeli ‘freakout’ over Iran deal, says Trump only world leader who still likes Israel



US Vice President JD Vance castigated Israeli officials on Thursday for not backing the US’s nuclear deal with Iran, accusing far-right cabinet ministers of lacking appreciation for American support, as he made the case for the newly signed memorandum of understanding at a White House press briefing.

“You have seen people within Bibi’s cabinet, who have come out and attacked the deal, and in some ways very personally attacked the president of the United States,” he told reporters, using a nickname for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whom he exempted from his explicit ire.

“Number one, Donald J. Trump is the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time. And he happens to be the head of state of the world’s superpower,” Vance said.

“If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left in the entire world.”

“The other thing that I would say is that over the last three months, two thirds of the defensive weapons that have protected your homeland, have been built by American hands and paid for by American tax dollars,” he said.

“The problem for Israel is not Donald J. Trump. And anybody in Israel who thinks their biggest problem is the president of the United States needs to wake up and smell the reality of the situation that country is in,” Vance concluded.

Vance’s comments referred to Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, far-right partners of Netanyahu who have both called for Israel to disregard the terms of the deal, describing it as a danger to the country’s security.


Earlier, Vance told The New York Times that he found “this whole freakout in Israel a little bit odd,” suggesting that concern over the deal came from unjustified mistrust of the US.

“It’s clear that large segments of the Israeli political system and population are very sensitive about this deal,” he said. “But I also think they’re picking up on some misinformation about the deal and running with it and sort of panicking about it.”

Asked how he’d respond to the ministers, Vance said: “I guess my response to them would be: What is your exact proposal? You’re a country of nine million people. You can’t just kill your way out of solving every single national security problem that you have.”

With the deal in effect, Tehran obtained large-scale economic relief and agreed in principle to a subsequent dilution of its enriched uranium.

However, the MOU did not resolve any of the war goals declared by the US and Israel following their joint strikes that kicked off the war in February. Rather, it pushed off discussion of Iran’s nuclear program and other core issues to a 60-day negotiation period, which Vance said began on Thursday.

More...