LAVROV DROPS THE MASK: AMERICA IS NOT HELPING — IT IS FIGHTING RUSSIA

LAVROV DROPS THE MASK: AMERICA IS NOT HELPING — IT IS FIGHTING RUSSIA

BP   Via Mark

Sergey Lavrov just stated what Western media refuses to admit. The United States is not a distant supporter of Ukraine. According to Russia’s Foreign Minister, America is an active participant in the war against Russia itself.

THE DIRECT PARTICIPATION

 Lavrov said American officials supply weapons, intelligence data, and the Starlink system.

 He stressed these are not passive forms of assistance.

     The United States, he declared, “not only helps, but directly participates in targeting Ukrainian weapons at targets, including civilian targets on Russian territory.”

THE REAL ROLE

 Arms shipments funded through European channels still carry American direction.

 Real-time intelligence and Starlink connectivity allow Ukrainian forces to strike with precision they would not otherwise possess.

    Lavrov framed this as active combat involvement, not remote sponsorship.

THE DOUBLE STANDARD

 Western capitals accuse Russia and China of arming Iran.

 At the same time, Lavrov pointed out, America openly enables strikes deep inside Russia while denying it is a party to the conflict.

     He left the contradiction hanging in plain sight.

THE BOTTOM LINE

When a major power provides the weapons, the targeting data, and the communication network that guide missiles onto another country’s soil, it is no longer a helper. It is a combatant.

More..

Report: CENTCOM chief urged halt to Hormuz campaign unless US prepared to escalate

Report: CENTCOM chief urged halt to Hormuz campaign unless US prepared to escalate

Nava Freiberg

CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper recommended halting the US bombing campaign against Iran around the Strait of Hormuz unless Washington was prepared to escalate into a broader military campaign, arguing that the operation had largely reached the limits of its effectiveness, Axios reports, citing two sources familiar with his assessment.

The report comes after the second night in a row without US strikes on Iran, after nearly two weeks of nightly attacks and retaliations by Tehran targeting US allies across the region.

According to Axios, Cooper gave his recommendation to the Pentagon, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the White House, ahead of a Friday meeting between Trump and senior advisers, during which the president decided to pause the attacks. Cooper said the campaign had significantly degraded Iran’s ability to attack ships in the Strait, noting that designated bombing targets had been mostly exhausted, the sources tell Axios.

The sources add that Cooper raised the possibility of resuming major combat operations against a remaining 20 percent of targets that the US military had designated, but did not strike during the US-Israeli campaign against Iran, and that, absent that move, there was no point in continuing the campaign in Hormuz.

According to reports from The New York Times and CNN, Vice President JD Vance and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine both raised concerns about escalating the war in Iran as Trump weighed the possibility on Friday, amid concerns in the administration about expanding the conflict as defense stockpiles are being depleted and while there is a risk of alienating Middle East Gulf allies, affecting energy supplies and the global economy.

In the meantime, Trump’s top envoys, Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, are holding talks with the Iranians, both directly and through mediators, according to Axios and Channel 12 reporter Barak Ravid.

For now, the sides have reached an informal understanding of “quiet for quiet,” meaning neither side will fire as long as the current calm holds, Channel 12 reports, noting that Oman and Iran continue efforts to reach an agreement regarding the Strait of Hormuz, though there is no guarantee that Trump will accept any such agreement.

Report: US special forces preparing potential raid to seize Iran’s enriched uranium

Report: US special forces preparing potential raid to seize Iran’s enriched uranium

i24NEWS

US special operations forces were preparing for a possible mission to seize enriched uranium from Iran’s fortified nuclear facilities, the New York Postreported, citing a source familiar with military planning and US security experts.

The operation could involve thousands of troops securing nuclear sites, clearing damaged or booby-trapped entrances and establishing protected routes to an airfield. A smaller team of special operators would then enter the facilities and remove the nuclear material, according to the report.

Joseph Rodgers, deputy director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told the Post that a military operation could become the most likely option if negotiations failed to produce an agreement on Iran’s uranium stockpile. He described any such mission as exceptionally complex and dangerous.Potential targets included the damaged Fordo and Isfahan facilities, as well as the underground Pickaxe Mountain complex near Natanz, where Iran was reported to have transferred hundreds of centrifuges.

Iran had reinforced the Isfahan site and placed mines and explosives in its tunnels in anticipation of a possible raid, it is understood. US forces would need to maintain control of the surrounding area and airspace while construction crews reopened access points and transported the uranium.

Richard Goldberg, a former US National Security Council official, said a raid on Pickaxe Mountain could instead focus on infiltrating the site, placing explosives and withdrawing, if airstrikes alone were considered insufficient to destroy the facility.

Climate Alarmism, The Beast System And Its Enablers

Climate alarmism is key to the Globalists’ plan

Rhoda Wilson

Climate change catastrophe is a manufactured crisis used by powerful families, especially the Rockefellers, to push a global surveillance and digital‑control agenda, Jacob Nordangård says

“Elites” are funding and controlling environmental groups, think‑tanks and media which shape environmental narratives and drive policies to bring about an agentic state or “digital world brain,” where everyone in the world is ruled over using AI agents.

The lies about global warming go back a long way, largely to one family: the Rockefellers. Nordangård takes the view that the Rockefellers, as far as they’re concerned, aren’t doing it for evil reasons but instead view themselves as responsible for making the world a better place, to create a utopia as designed by them, “almost like they have this religious quest,” and they “think it’s okay to actually lie to achieve this.”

Delingpole thinks Nordangård is being too kind.  “I’ve looked into the history of their personal behaviour, let’s say, is sometimes wanting. I’m thinking of David Rockefeller, for example. I mean, he kept and groomed these sort of MK Ultra, sort of sex slaves, or he ran somebody like that. I think they were involved in child abuse and probably ritual satanic abuse.”

Nordangård is the author of the book ‘The Digital World Brain’ in which he explains that UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ report ‘Our Common Future’ led to the adoption of ‘Pact for the Future’.  If fully implemented, the ‘Pact for the Future’ will give the UN, WHO, G20, along with leading multinational corporations, financial institutions and “philanthropies” (through the World Economic Forum), unprecedented global powers that will inevitably be abused even more than previous totalitarian powers throughout history.

Their plan, Nordangård said, “As the title [of my book] indicates, The Digital World Brain, is to construct a digital control system for the whole world, where every human and every kind of item will be connected to the internet. We are already part of this system, but they want you to take it to another level, and this also involves the financial system, because that’s the core of it.”

“Everything we do will be tracked and surveilled, and it’s a kind of Orwellian society.”

The false global warming, climate alarmism and CO2 narratives are key because everything will be assigned a CO2 emissions value linked to a monetary value.

Related: Iain Davis, The Delingpod, 10 June 2026

“The global warming theory, the climate change agenda has been so important, because it’s connecting everything, and this is something that the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation wrote about in their annual review from 2005,” Nordangård said.

To stop the masses from rebelling against their scheme, all they had to do was convince the public that they wanted a World Government to step in and solve all the problems.

“Right after the Second World War, [big corporations] were funding [ ] organisations like Conservation Foundation and also being very, very involved with the Population Council and these ideas of overpopulation. And this has been a very, very important part of it,” Nordangård said.

“Those who promoted [the climate change agenda] in the beginning, they were all a part of this movement of talking about population control.”

“At the beginning it was the elite’s view with overpopulation, it goes back to Thomas Malthus, but they kind of repackaged it into environmentalism and started these ‘grassroots’ movements … And, of course, we have Greta Thunberg now, which is demanding these things and saying to elite ‘we have to do these things’ and’ we the people demand this’ but it’s actually the elite’s view. So, it’s very, very cleverly done.”

More....

Tennessee Congressman Finds Himself Under A Coordinated Assault For Opposing Climate Alarmism

Israel waits on Iran while becoming entangled on another front

Israel waits on Iran while becoming entangled on another front

Yoav Limor

The terrorist attack Friday near the Palestinian village of Tell in Samaria diverted the Israeli security establishment from its intensive focus on Iran. What the media dryly described as "heightened alert" and "vigilance" was, in practice, a state of maximum readiness for the resumption of the campaign against Iran.

Israeli officials believed the Americans might strike overnight between Friday and Saturday. For now, the attacks appear to have been postponed, though not necessarily for long. Faced with a choice between a ceasefire to allow talks and a broad resumption of the campaign, US President Donald Trump is giving the former a chance, but appears inclined toward the latter. 

His meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington this week is likely to focus on coordinating policy on Iran, as the two did ahead of the previous campaigns in June last year and February this year.

Netanyahu wants the campaign to resume, in the hope that the regime in Tehran will fall. The security establishment is skeptical, however, because there is no magic formula that can guarantee results different from those achieved in the last round.

After Israel failed to bring down the regime by eliminating its leaders and senior military and security officials, it urged the Americans to try doing so through systematic attacks on Iran's national infrastructure. The hope was that, without electricity and water, the public would take to the streets and finish the job. The Americans objected, fearing a humanitarian catastrophe, and in any case no one could guarantee that the plan would produce the desired outcome.

Meanwhile, the security establishment was drawn into events in Judea and Samaria following the attack in which Benayahu Malt and Maj. Yuval Ezra were murdered. An Israel Defense Forces investigation found that a group entered the Palestinian village without coordination and became involved in a confrontation with local residents, which quickly escalated into violence. An IDF force and the civilian security squad from the nearby community of Havat Gilad arrived at the scene.

During the confrontation, the community security coordinator's rifle was seized and used to shoot and kill the two men and seriously wound a third. IDF troops wounded the terrorists, who fled to Nablus. They were later arrested by the IDF's elite Duvdevan counterterrorism unit at a hospital in the city and transferred for questioning by the Shin Bet security agency.

The grave incident requires a thorough examination and lessons to be learned. The IDF must ask itself how capable it truly is of securing the area and what steps it should now take, given the disturbing increase in terrorist attacks over the past week.

More...