Saturday, August 22, 2026

As debt surpasses $40 trillion, the bill for Washington spending comes due


As debt surpasses $40 trillion, the bill for Washington spending comes due


Year after year, the federal government has spent more than it collected in taxes. Each annual shortfall increased the national debt, slowly at first and then by leaps, defying warnings of an inevitable reckoning.
Now, the reckoning may be at hand.

This week’s bond market sell-off brought government borrowing costs to their highest level in almost two decades and prompted an extraordinary Treasury Department intervention.

On Friday, the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond topped 5.27 percent, up slightly from one day earlier, a sign that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s plan to calm markets is not working. After decades of free spending, Washington may soon be compelled to make some long-deferred, and politically unpalatable, choices that will leave few Americans unscathed.

“This is what the bond market is trying to signal: We’re going to have to make choices that hurt growth,” said Adam Abbas, who manages $4 billion in bonds for the Oakmark Funds. “We have two levers to do that: raise taxes or cut spending. Either option is not politically popular, and it will never be popular, but at some point we have to address the problem.”

The problem is a $40 trillion national debt, along with crisis-level annual budget deficits that require significant new borrowing.

When the Treasury Department woos investors for its bonds, it competes with other governments and corporations — notably the hyperscalers building the nation’s artificial intelligence infrastructure. All that competition for capital means investors can demand higher returns, or yields, from those that want their money.

Fiscal watchdogs have warned for decades that rising U.S. debt will eventually trigger a crisis. As borrowing costs rise, debt becomes more expensive in what can become a vicious cycle, said Marc Goldwein, senior policy director for the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

“What I worry about is we’re on the verge of sort of a real debt spiral, which happens when your interest [bill] is growing faster than your economy,” Goldwein said.

Fast-rising bond yields or interest rates often reverberate through the financial system in unexpected ways, exposing costly vulnerabilities. In 2023, for example, Silicon Valley Bank failed after rising bond yields blew a hole in its balance sheet.

Today, potential weak spots in the financial system include some of the nation’s largest hedge funds, where borrowed money used for investments, or leverage, is “near all-time highs,” according to the minutes of the Fed’s July 28-29 meeting. Likewise, traditionally staid life insurers are holding riskier assets that would be difficult to unload quickly if they needed to raise cash during a crisis.

Financial setbacks also could occur overseas in places like France or Japan, said Rebecca Patterson, former chief investment strategist for Bridgewater Associates and now a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations

“When we’re thinking about what could cause a crisis in the U.S., don’t just think about what’s happening in the U.S. Think about other markets that could be vulnerable,” she said.

The U.S. now spends more than $1 trillion each year paying interest on the national credit card, more than it devotes to Medicare, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. As recently as 2010, the interest bill was less than one-fifth that amount.

As Europe Becomes Increasingly Militarized, Norway Expands New Arctic Brigade, Strengthening NATO’s Northern Border


As Europe Becomes Increasingly Militarized, Norway Expands New Arctic Brigade, Strengthening NATO’s Northern Border


The high northern regions of the planet are now undergoing the same militarization push that is affecting the whole European continent.

And beyond the tensions over control of Greenland, there’s also the overhyped yet very real Russian and Chinese threat as new maritime trade routes open in the Arctic.

On Thursday (20), Norway announced the expansion of its newly created  brigade headquartered in the Arctic.

Reuters reported:

“The NATO ‌member established the Finnmark Brigade last year, forming the country’s second brigade and the first one set up since the end of the Cold War. Both brigades have their headquarters ​in the Arctic.

Norway, like the other Nordic countries, has steeply increased its military ​budget in response to the  war and U.S. President Donald ⁠Trump’s push to get European allies to contribute more to defense.”

Norway has more than doubled its defense spending to 3,17% of GDP, from just 1,5% back in 2014.

“One of the Finnmark Brigade’s main duties until now was ​to surveil and patrol the 198-km (123-mile) border Norway shares with .

It is being ​expanded to include an artillery battalion, air defense battery and communications company that will enable it ‌to carry ⁠out certain actions, such as firing at targets on land some 40 km away or coordinating firing with planes and ships from both Norwegian and NATO forces.”

The Barents Observer reported:

“The NASAMS and NOMADS missile systems might become part of the Finnmark Brigade, the commander of a newly established combat air defense unit confirmed to the National Defense Magazine (Forsvarets Forum).

According to Commander Brede Brandskognes, new air defense systems will be incorporated into the unit in 2027. ‘The new combat air defense battery in the Finnmark Brigade is set to have a layered air defense system within the next few years’, Brandskognes explained to the National Defense Magazine.

The innermost layer of defense will be based on Piorun MANPADS, followed by C-UAS (an anti-drone system) and armoured air defense vehicles. Finally, there will be the medium-range missiles.”


The Perils of Replacement Theology


If The Church Will Not Teach The Truth About Israel, Someone Else Will Gladly Teach The Next Generation A Lie


There is a spiritual battle raging today over one nation unlike any other in history. That nation is Israel.

It seems everyone has an opinion about Israel—politicians, journalists, influencers, podcasters, celebrities, and social media personalities. Sadly, one of the few places where many Christians are not hearing about Israel is from the pulpit.

That silence has come at a tremendous cost.

The issue of Israel has become a dividing line in the Church. Entire denominations, Bible colleges, seminaries, pastors, and Christian influencers are abandoning the biblical view of Israel and replacing it with theological systems that deny Israel’s future. As a result, millions of Christians are confused about God’s plan for the Jewish people, while younger generations are increasingly adopting anti-Israel narratives from secular voices rather than biblical truth.

The Root of the Problem: Replacement Theology

At the heart of the confusion is Replacement Theology.

Replacement Theology teaches that God has permanently rejected Israel as His chosen nation and replaced her with the Church. According to this view, the Church has inherited Israel’s covenants, promises, and prophetic destiny, while the Jewish people forfeited their unique role in God’s redemptive plan by rejecting Jesus as their Messiah.

To reach this conclusion, Replacement Theology must allegorize or spiritualize the plain, literal promises God made to Israel and reinterpret them as promises to the Church. The Church becomes the “New Israel” or the “True Israel,” while ethnic Israel supposedly no longer has a distinct future in God’s program.

But this is not merely a theological disagreement.

It has had enormous historical consequences.

By teaching that the Jewish people lost their covenant standing before God, Replacement Theology has provided a theological basis for hostility toward the Jews. It portrays Jewish suffering as evidence of God’s rejection rather than recognizing that God has preserved Israel for her future restoration according to His unconditional promises.

Now, to be clear, many Christians who hold to Replacement Theology are not personally antisemitic. Many sincerely love Jewish people and desire to see them come to faith in Christ. But the theological system itself is structurally harmful because it denies Israel’s God-given identity, covenant promises, and prophetic future.

Wrong theology always produces wrong thinking—and wrong thinking often produces wrong behavior.

History bears this out. Throughout much of Christian Europe, this theological framework helped justify discrimination, forced conversions, expulsions, and persecution of the Jewish people. While the Holocaust was driven primarily by Nazi racial ideology rather than Christian theology, centuries of anti-Jewish teaching influenced by Replacement Theology helped create a culture in which such hatred found fertile soil.

Biblical scholar Thomas Ice rightly observed: “Wherever Replacement Theology has flourished, the Jews have had to run for cover. Wherever such a view has gone it has always led to anti-Semitism.”

Likewise, Dr. Gary Hedrick writes: “Replacement Theology has provided the basis for all sorts of mischief, persecution, and atrocities against the Jewish people throughout Christian history.”

Ultimately, this debate is about far more than Israel; it is about the character of God.

If God can permanently revoke His unconditional covenants with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, and the nation of Israel, then His promises are no longer unconditional. Yet Paul declares in Romans 11 that “the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable” (Rom. 11:29). God’s faithfulness to Israel demonstrates His faithfulness to every believer.

The Church’s Silence Has Created an Information Vacuum

Unfortunately, many churches have stopped teaching on Israel altogether. Whether because of Replacement Theology, the Church Growth Movement, the Seeker-Friendly Movement, the Purpose Driven Movement, or simply the fear of offending people, countless pastors avoid the subject completely.

When pastors stop teaching, someone else fills the vacuum.

That is exactly what has happened. Today, millions of Millennials and Generation Z are forming their opinions about Israel not from Scripture but from internet personalities, political commentators, podcasters, and social media influencers. Names such as Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, the Tate brothers, Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian, Stew Peters, Kanye West, Jake Shields, Shawn Ryan, Dave Smith, and countless others now shape the conversation about Israel for an entire generation.

Whether these voices come from the political right or the political left is beside the point. The church abandoned the conversation. The culture stepped in. And now young Christians are being discipled more by YouTube than by the Bible.

That should deeply concern every pastor.

More....

Spanish Beach Stormed As Ceuta Chaos Spreads



Dozens of military-age men leapt from boats onto packed tourist beaches in mainland Spain this week, sending holidaymakers scrambling for their belongings as the fallout from the Ceuta mass crossing continues to escalate.

Footage from Cala del Barco near the exclusive La Manga Club in Cartagena captured the moment a large vessel packed with predominantly North African males in their late teens and twenties powered close to shore in broad daylight.

The men jumped into the water, waded or swam the final metres, and charged inland past stunned sunbathers.

Local officials did not hide their anger. Cartagena mayor Noelia Arroyo stated: "This cannot be normalised. We cannot accept that human trafficking mafias have such an easy time reaching our shores."

"If a migrant boat can reach a cove like this, disembark in full view of citizens and then leave, we have to ask ourselves how the control of our maritime borders is working," Arroyo further urged.

Former mayor Francisco Bernabe asked: "How is it possible that a boat of that size was not detected by the surveillance radar? Are they broken? Do they have them turned off? Or are they working and they simply ignore them?"

Authorities later reported 62 people aboard, including 45 adult men, two adult women and 15 minors, mostly of presumed Algerian nationality.

Police and Red Cross responded after the vessel had already turned and left.

The landings come weeks after more than 70,000 people poured into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta from Morocco. While officials claimed the majority returned, thousands remained, and the spectacle of open landings on mainland tourist beaches has left many Spaniards convinced the message of impunity has spread.

In Ceuta itself the situation remains dire. Spanish police relocated hundreds of mostly young male migrants from El TrampolĂ­n beach to temporary facilities in industrial and military zones.

Videos


Soros And The Planned Destruction Of Western Civilization


George Soros pushing mass migration is to destroy Western Civilization
superadmin

Joe Rogan “Why are they supporting this kind of mass immigration? — Is there a plan involved in all this? What is happening?” Elon Musk “Cause if you wanted to destroy civilization, if you wanted to destroy Western civilization, which George Soros seems to wanna do” He explains the liberals are weaponizing our empathy to mass import foreigners with the specific intent to destroy western civilization If Democrats ever regain power the border will open back up and we restart this all over againElon Musk doesn’t mince words. 

In a recent discussion that cut through the noise, he laid it out plainly when asked why certain powerful Democrats and their donors keep pushing mass immigration despite the chaos it creates:

“Cause if you wanted to destroy civilization, if you wanted to destroy Western civilization, which George Soros seems to wanna do…”


That’s not a fringe theory. That’s the world’s richest man, the guy building rockets and electric cars while staring down the same cultural rot the rest of us see every day, connecting the dots that the corporate media refuses to touch.


Musk has been hammering this theme for years under the banner of suicidal empathy — a term he popularized after borrowing it from evolutionary psychologist Gad Saad. The idea is simple and devastating: Western societies have a built-in bug. Our high-trust, high-empathy culture, forged in Christian and Enlightenment values, can be exploited by people who do not share those values. When we prioritize the feelings of outsiders over the survival of our own civilization, we commit slow-motion suicide.


Musk put it bluntly on Joe Rogan: “We’ve got civilizational suicidal empathy going on… The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy. The empathy exploit. They’re exploiting a bug in Western civilization, which is the empathy response.” He has repeated the warning again and again on X: “Either the suicidal empathy of Western civilization ends or Western civilization will end.” And: “Suicidal empathy is killing Western Civilization.”



Look at Europe. After Angela Merkel’s open-door policy in 2015, Germany, Sweden, France, and others imported millions from cultures with radically different attitudes toward women, law, free speech, and assimilation. The results are no longer debatable for anyone paying attention.


In Sweden, immigrants and their children are heavily overrepresented in rape convictions (roughly two-thirds in multiple studies) and violent crime. The country that once prided itself on safety now deals with grenade attacks and gang shootings in cities that used to be quiet. Malmö has become a cautionary tale.


France’s banlieues have turned into parallel societies where police enter only in force. Sexual violence on public transport has exploded. German officials themselves have admitted foreign suspects account for a wildly disproportionate share of violent crime and sexual assaults, including the mass attacks on New Year’s Eve in Cologne that the media tried to memory-hole.


The UK’s grooming gang scandals — industrial-scale rape of working-class British girls by networks of mostly Pakistani-origin men — were covered up for years by authorities terrified of being called racist. That is suicidal empathy in its purest form: protect the narrative, sacrifice the native daughters.


These are not isolated failures. They are the predictable outcome of importing large numbers of people from low-trust, high-violence, clan-based societies into high-trust Western ones without demanding assimilation. The same pattern shows up in no-go zones, parallel legal systems, and rising antisemitism and anti-Western sentiment among certain migrant populations.


America has been running the same experiment under Democrat administrations. Record illegal crossings under Biden turned the southern border into a conveyor belt. Sanctuary cities, free healthcare for illegals in places like California, and soft-on-crime district attorneys (many funded by Soros-linked groups) complete the picture.


Musk has been clear about the  political motive: Democrats are importing a new voting bloc. Legalize enough people in swing states, provide benefits, and those states stop swinging. California already shows the end state — a one-party machine that never has to face real accountability. Musk has warned that if the open-border machine had continued uninterrupted, America was headed for permanent one-party rule.


George Soros and his Open Society network have spent decades and billions funding the infrastructure: pro-migration NGOs, progressive prosecutors who refuse to enforce the law, and activist groups that treat any enforcement as cruelty. Musk has repeatedly called this out, stating flatly that Soros wants to end Western civilization and has spent fortunes creating the asylum-seeker nightmare that is straining both America and Europe.


Real empathy includes empathy for your own children, your own culture, and the hard-won achievements of the West: individual rights, free inquiry, equality under the law, and the safety of women and girls. Suicidal empathy inverts that hierarchy. It treats the native population as the problem and the unvetted newcomer as the moral priority.


The data keeps stacking up. Crime stats, fertility collapse among natives, parallel societies that reject the host culture, and political capture by imported voters. Musk is not inventing this. He is describing what is already visible in European cities and American border towns.


Western nations that want to survive will have to choose. They can keep the current path — open borders, soft justice, and the constant demand to feel more and think less — or they can recover the will to prioritize their own continuity. Closing the border, enforcing the law, ending the benefits magnet, and demanding assimilation are not “hate.” They are the minimum requirements of any people that intends to remain a people.


Elon Musk is saying what millions already know but are told they cannot say. The goal of the mass-migration project pushed by certain Democrat donors is not charity. It is transformation. And transformation without consent is conquest by other means.