Thursday, October 15, 2026

What Is Making People Near Data Centers Sick


What Is Making People Near Data Centers Sick (and What Could Fix It)


Communities next to data centers are reporting a cluster of health complaints that closely matches what electrically sensitive people have described for decades. A Bloomberg analysis of 770,000 home sensors suggests why: data centers inject enormous amounts of “dirty electricity” back onto the grid, and the worst power distortion in the country clusters within 20 miles of them.

David Sacks (who ran AI policy for the White House) told the G20 that about $800 billion is being invested in AI infrastructure in the United States this year, that the figure is expected to reach $1.4 trillion next year, and that the only comparable buildout was the railroads in the 1800s.¹ Data center construction now accounts for nearly a quarter of all nonresidential building in the country.¹

Because data centers need city-sized amounts of power, land, and fiber, many are being placed in less affluent communities (including throughout the Midwest, which is a large part of why I wrote this). Residents there are experiencing rising electricity bills (as grid upgrade costs get passed to ratepayers; the clearest documented case being the PJM grid serving the mid-Atlantic, whose independent monitor attributed most of a ten-fold jump in capacity prices to data center demand),¹ large water draws for cooling,¹ constant noise from cooling systems and generators, and air pollution from onsite turbines.¹


A minority of people are electrically hypersensitive (becoming quite ill around EMFs), some (myself included) are EMF sensitive but can tolerate everyday life, some don’t notice EMFs but have symptoms that resolve once they turn off their wifi at night, and many seem unaffected. The standard rebuttal is that EMFs are too weak to be ionizing, so any effect must be thermal, so consumer devices are harmless, whereas in reality they can still do many harmful things (e.g., cell phones cause blood cells to clump together, a process I believe underlies many diseases).

Given this, the symptoms people reported from living next to data centers (which were attributed to the noise) caught my eye. Beyond the constant hum, vibration and generator fumes, residents consistently report sleep disruption, headaches or migraines, feeling constantly on edge, fatigue and poor concentration, nausea, dizziness or vertigo, ear pressure or fullness, tinnitus, and feeling the sound in the head or chest,¹,²,³ along with pets becoming restless and birds disappearing. Many of these (headaches, sleep disruption, fatigue, brain fog, anxiety, nausea, dizziness, tinnitus) overlap with what individuals with electromagnetic hypersensitivity report,¹,²and already EMF sensitive individuals report some of their other symptoms (e.g., burning skin) near data centers.


Data centers produce a constant hum from their cooling systems (along with diesel generators during tests and outages, and at some sites gas turbines that run around the clock), and residents describe it as a vacuum left on that can still be heard after going inside, along with vibration in windows, walls, and sometimes the body, and a sense of pressure rather than an ordinary sound.¹^,^² There is decent scientific support that chronic environmental noise alone causes or worsens many of the reported effects (sleep disruption, headaches, stress and irritability, fatigue and poor concentration),¹and a large portion of what these facilities emit is infrasound (sound below the typical threshold of human hearing), which is a recognized hazard at high exposure levels and has been extensively linked to the symptoms near data centers that are not classically associated with EMFs, such as ear fullness or pain, hearing deterioration, nausea, vertigo, and feeling the sound in the head or chest¹,²,³ (along with it being widely recognized that species like elephants can hear infrasound and become agitated when it is present). This is why many who have moved away from data centers report their homes could no longer be used as a refuge, their pets became restless, and the birds left.



Evangelism, Hope, And Awe: Why God Tells Us The Future


Evangelism, Hope, And Awe: Why God Tells Us The Future


What are God’s reasons for telling us why He will replace human government with Christ’s Millennial Kingdom?

God’s reasons involve both ultimate and immediate purposes. First, let’s look at the ultimate purpose. God provided special revelation through the prophets and Jesus Christ—the source of all prophetic revelation (Revelation 19:10). Our Lord used words, visions, dreams, miracles, and theophanies so that He could, as theologian Lit-Sen Chang stated, “reveal His divinity to His creation, display His many excellencies, and declare His glory, especially in His work of redemption.”

As we witness how God’s plan for the ages unfolds, we’re meant to be astounded more and more by our wonderful Creator, Redeemer, and King.

And second, the immediate purpose is achieved when God displays His awe-inspiring majesty. Doing so causes sinners to fall on their faces in repentance, become regenerate, and live on to fulfill their ultimate purpose of loving God and each other for all eternity. When the fallen become saved, their miraculous recreation and restoration into a right relationship with the heavenly Father reflects His glorious excellencies, which go on to lead even more of the lost to salvation.

Big Picture Purposes

Did you know that a whopping 31 percent of the Bible is prophetic? God truly wants us to know the future! Knowing God’s prophetic Word, therefore, becomes extremely vital to our lives.

How God reveals Himself and His will through the unfolding of biblical prophecies acts as an evangelistic beacon calling sinners to salvation and into a right relationship with the everlasting Father. And, for those who are already saved, Bible prophecy can also be wielded as a powerful apologetic, which, as Jude defined, allows Christians to “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3).

God’s little-picture purpose for revealing His future victories is directed at two different people groups. The first consisted of the prophets’ immediate audience—the Israelites. After 70 years of exile to a pagan, foreign nation, the Jews in Daniel’s time held very little hope of ever returning to their homeland. God’s prophetic messages to Israel—both then and now—were meant to reassure the Jewish people that their time of exile from their homeland and His presence would indeed come to an end. Because God remains ever-faithful to His covenants, He then must restore His people—not only to Jerusalem but also into His everlasting kingdom. Prophecy provided the ancient Israelites with hope, and as you see, is meant to give modern-day Israel great hope as well.

There’s a second group that will benefit from this little-picture purpose for why God has promised a divine, everlasting kingdom. Biblical scholar Sidney Greidanus explained that God wanted to provide much-needed hope to His other chosen people—the Church. Ever since the Church was founded at Pentecost and up to that wondrous day when Christ will call all His faithful up to heaven in the rapture—this era called the Church age—Christians have suffered and will continue to suffer mightily under the oppression of failed human governments. Why, a staggering 45 million Christians were martyred in the twentieth century alone!

As we, the Church, wait for Jesus to usher in His perfect kingdom, we groan unceasingly under the pains of persecution. We’re oftentimes left dismayed that there appears to be no end in sight to our sufferings. The longer this promised kingdom is delayed, the easier it becomes for Christians to lose hope, and so risk losing faith in Jesus and His stated promise to return.

To counter this malaise, God has revealed hope-filled prophecies about Christ’s kingdom that are meant to confirm His faithfulness as a covenant-keeper who always keeps His promises. With that revelation, we Christians can take heart, shore up our faith, and persevere in our hope that infinitely better days lie ahead.


Tensions flare near Strait of Hormuz as a ship is seized and another is sunk


Tensions flare near Strait of Hormuz as a ship is seized and another is sunk


 A ship anchored off the United Arab Emirates was seized and taken toward Iran and another — a cargo ship near Oman — sank after being attacked, authorities said Thursday, as tensions escalated near the Strait of Hormuz.

It wasn’t immediately clear who was behind these incidents, but they happened as a senior Iranian official reiterated his country’s claim of control over the waterway and another said it had a right to seize oil tankers connected to the U.S. 

The turmoil in the strait, which a fifth of the world’s oil passed through before the war, has been a sticking point for weeks in talks between the U.S. and Iran to end the conflict. Iran’s grip on the vital waterway has jolted the world economy and spiked fuel prices far beyond the Middle East.

The ongoing instability in the region came as U.S. President Donald Trump met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing. The White House said both sides had agreed that the Strait of Hormuzmust remain open.

Just last week, tensions flared in the strait when U.S. forces fired on and disabled Iranian oil tankers that they said were trying to breach its blockade of Iran’s ports.

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center said it received reports that the ship seized Thursday was taken by unauthorized personnel while anchored 38 nautical miles (70 kilometers, 44 miles) northeast of the UAE port of Fujairah, an important oil export terminal that has been repeatedly attacked during the war with Iran. 

The U.K. maritime center did not name the ship seized Thursday and said it is investigating. The British military said the vessel is heading toward Iranian waters.

Indian authorities said Thursday that an Indian-flagged cargo ship sank off the coast of Oman after an attack sparked a fire aboard the vessel while it was en route from Somalia to Sharjah, another UAE port. They did not say who attacked the ship.

The attack on the Indian-flagged cargo ship Haji Ali occurred Wednesday, according to Mukesh Mangal, a senior official in India’s shipping ministry. He said all 14 Indian crew members were rescued by Oman’s coast guard and were safe.

India’s foreign ministry called the incident “unacceptable” and condemned continued attacks on commercial shipping and civilian mariners. The ministry did not identify who carried out the attack.



US Military Forces Destroy Iran-Affiliated Ship Targeting US Navy Ships in Gulf of Oman (VIDEO)


US Military Forces Destroy Iran-Affiliated Ship Targeting US Navy Ships in Gulf of Oman (VIDEO)


 on Wednesday announced that US Military forces destroyed an Iran-affiliated ship targeting US Navy ships in the Gulf of Oman on October 6.

Two US Marine Corps Apache helicopters fired missiles at the dhow.

Crew members were evacuated from the vessel prior to the destruction. 

Full statement from CENTCOM:

On Oct. 6, U.S. forces destroyed an Iranian-affiliated dhow conducting surveillance and targeting U.S. Navy ships in the Gulf of Oman. 

Over the past seven months, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has continued to indiscriminately target thousands of civilian mariners transiting regional waters in addition to U.S. Navy warships. Crew members were safely removed prior to destruction of the dhow. Repatriation efforts are ongoing.


The  strikes on the vessels come as Iran-backed Houthis fired missiles at Saudi Arabia’s King Khalid International Airport.

Twelve people died and hundreds were injured after the latest Houthi missile attack on Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport.

The airport shut down operations on Saturday as officials assessed the damage.

President Trump fired a warning shot to the Houthis on Tuesday amid escalating tensions in the region.


EU Digital ID Could Become The Default Way To Prove Identity To Banks


EU Digital ID Could Become The Default Way To Prove Identity To Banks

The EU’s anti-money laundering authority wants electronic ID, including the bloc’s European Digital Identity (EUDI) wallet, to become the standard way people prove their identity to banks.

Remote alternatives such as video and selfie checks will still be allowed, but only as an exception that the bank will have to justify to its supervisor.

The EUDI wallet was sold to EU citizens as a voluntary, convenient, and secure way to store their ID, driver’s license, and other documents, and to use it for accessing public and private services online and in person.

The EU’s Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AMLA) has submitted its final draft standards for customer due diligence to the European Commission (EC).

AMLA is pushing for the EUDI wallet to be the go-to choice here, saying that electronic identification means, including the wallet, “should be used wherever possible.”

The standard refers to the wallet as “European Digital Identity Wallets” and says that it is one of the electronic identification means that provides “substantial” or “high” assurance levels, and should therefore be used wherever possible.

The draft standard covers customer due diligence, including “the information companies and professionals must collect and verify,” as well as “non-face-to-face verification, electronic identification, and screening of politically exposed persons.”