Sunday, June 14, 2026

Top Iranian official says Israel’s Dahiyeh strikes show US can’t or won’t live up to deal


Top Iranian official says Israel’s Dahiyeh strikes show US can’t or won’t live up to deal

Times of Israel is liveblogging Sunday

After Israel strikes Hezbollah targets in Beirut’s Dahiyeh neighborhood, Iran seeks to paint the attacks as a threat to an emerging deal between Tehran and Washington.

“The Zionists’ incursion into Dahiyeh has once again shown that America either lacks the will to fulfill its commitments or the ability to do so,” writes Iran’s top negotiator and parliament speaker, Mohammad Ghalibaf, on X.

“By giving the green light to the regime, you cannot gain concessions. The game of bad cop and good cop is outdated,” he says.

“If you lack the will and ability to fulfill your commitments, speaking of continuing the path is not possible,” he threatens.

Iran is trying to ensure that any deal with the US ties Israel’s hands in Lebanon, thus protecting its powerful ally, Hezbollah. Israeli leaders insist they will not let that happen.

Meanwhile, Gen. Mohammad-Jafar Asadi, deputy chief of the Khatam al-Anbiya operational headquarters of Iran’s Armed Forces, tells local media that the Dahiyeh strike “will not go unanswered.”











Nuclear Ambitions And An Overwhelming Hatred Of Israel: Is Turkey ‘The New Iran’?


Nuclear Ambitions And An Overwhelming Hatred Of Israel: Is Turkey ‘The New Iran’?
Soeren Kern 


Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan recently said that Turkey “may be forced” to acquire nuclear weapons to counterbalance Israel and Iran to prevent them from dominating the Middle East. In an interview with CNN Türk, he described having a nuclear weapons capability as a “high-level strategic issue” that must be considered “within the broader, bigger picture” of regional geopolitics.

Fidan’s comments echo those by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who has said it is unfair for nuclear-armed states “like the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom”—the five permanent members of the UN Security Council—to prevent Turkey from obtaining nuclear weapons. “Some countries have missiles with nuclear warheads, not [only] one or two,” he said. “But they tell us we cannot have them. This, I cannot accept.”

Although Turkey currently relies on nuclear deterrence provided by the United States through NATO, the statements have raised concerns that Ankara may be considering an active nuclear weapons program.

A July 2025 poll by Research Istanbul found that more than 70% of Turks support a Turkish nuclear weapons capability because they do not believe that NATO would defend their country if it were attacked. This suggests that the Turkish debate about nuclear weapons is not just about Israel or Iran, but also about domestic politics and grievances about “nuclear injustice.”


In an analysis of Turkey’s nuclear program, Middle East analysts Sinan Ciddi and Andrea Stricker warned that if misused, Turkey’s civilian nuclear energy program “could assist” an effort to acquire nuclear weapons. “Nuclear-electrical power production provides a means for Ankara to acquire basic nuclear infrastructure, know-how, and training,” they wrote. “Nuclear energy programs have helpfully served as covers for states like Iran to import needed equipment for nuclear weapons.”

Ciddi and Stricker added, “Erdoğan aspires to elevate Turkey as a great power. Given his emphasis on strengthening conventional military capabilities, he may also seek to expand the country’s unconventional weapons arsenal to reinforce this ambition.”

Lebanese writer Mohamad Kawas agreed: “The Turkish nuclear debate reflects more than security anxieties; it signals a broader strategic repositioning by a state that perceives itself as a major regional power seeking to safeguard its role within an evolving international and regional order.”

Israeli scholar Noa Lazimi warned that nuclear ambitions are “closely tied to Turkey’s self-perception as a regional power with aspirations to revive an Ottoman-style sphere of influence.” She believes Turkey is pouring “enormous resources into its defense industries, and it is difficult to imagine it voluntarily giving up on the development of nuclear weapons, which could one day add a significant layer to its power projection and deterrence.”

Middle East expert Yoni Ben Menachem posited that Erdoğan is “moving rapidly to encircle Israel” by “working to consolidate the Sunni world, transforming former Arab rivals, including Egypt, into partners in a broader alignment that could redirect regional momentum against Israel.” He concluded, “Turkey is the new Iran.”

In Ezekiel chapters 38 through 39, we read of a future war—the “Gog and Magog” war—between Israel and a coalition of nations (including Iran, Russia, Turkey, and others). This coalition will attempt an invasion of the Jewish State, only to be destroyed by God’s hand of intervention on behalf of the modern nation of Israel. 

As noted by author Terry James, the alliances and anti-Israel rhetoric of Turkey in recent years highlight the nation’s increased positioning as part of this future coalition:

It is interesting to see that things are ramping up between Israel and its blood-vowed enemy, Iran. At the same time, another nation-state actor that’s part of the coalition that will comprise the Gog-Magog assault has interjected an equally fascinating element that brings that prophecy into ever-sharpening focus.

[On multiple occasions, Turkey’s leader has threatened military intervention in Israel, particularly following the commencement of the war between Hamas and the Jewish State.]

The Turkish dictator Recep Tayyip Erdoğan thus makes clearer how Togarmah, regarded as the geographical area of current-day Turkey by prophetic scholars, is moving into the Ezekiel 38–39 alliance. This movement has been growing for some time since Erdoğan took over as president of the country. Turkey, a member of NATO, has been moving more and more into the orbit of Iran and Russia and spewing hateful rhetoric against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Jewish state.


Persecution On Schedule


Growing Pressure for Preaching the Gospel
Chick Publications 



In country after country, Christians are finding that preaching the Gospel, gathering for worship, or simply holding to biblical beliefs is becoming increasingly costly. Governments and officials are using arrests, regulations, “public order” laws, and are even demolishing buildings to pressure believers into silence.

In the United Kingdom, senior pastor of Oasis City Church, Steve Maile, was arrested while street preaching as his wife and four children watched. Maile continued to proclaim the Gospel even as police handcuffed him.

To the officers, Maile said, “I am a preacher of the gospel. There is no offense being committed here. None whatsoever.” He then called out to the crowd one final time, “Repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you’ll be saved.”

After hours of interrogation, he was released around 1 a.m.

Simultaneously, Bread of Life Community Church in the UK is facing scrutiny after community members labeled sermons as being “Islamophobic,” “homophobic,” and “sexist.”

Trustee Stephen Clayden defended the sermons, saying, “They are not my statements; they are biblical statements.” The church also stated that it wouldn’t back down because of public pressure and remains committed to preaching “the whole Bible, not just the parts which suit society.”

Russia Targets Independent Believers

In Russia, four Baptist Christians were recently arrested and fined after holding a worship service inside a private home. Officials charged the believers with conducting “illegal missionary work” because their religious group was not registered with the government.

Under Russian law, believers can face severe penalties simply for conducting ministry outside state-approved buildings. Russian authorities have increasingly used this law to target unregistered churches and evangelistic activity.

Church Reduced to Rubble in China

Meanwhile in China, authorities demolished a prominent church in Wenzhou — an area sometimes called “China’s Jerusalem” because of its large Christian population.

Yazhong Church, an independent Protestant church, had already faced months of pressure from authorities. More than 100 believers were detained during earlier raids, and church leaders were jailed under vague public-order charges.

After the church resisted government demands to display the Chinese national flag inside the sanctuary, tensions escalated.

In May, demolition crews arrived with heavy security and reduced the church building to rubble. Authorities established checkpoints around the area, restricted access, and tightly controlled information during the demolition. Additional church members were also arrested as the destruction took place.

Bob Fu of ChinaAid said the demolition reflects a growing campaign against independent churches in China. “These recent actions show that the persecution of Christians by Chinese authorities has intensified, becoming more institutionalized and targeted,” he said.

Yet even after the church was destroyed, believers continued pointing people to Christ. Fu added, “This beautiful and sacred place of worship has been destroyed — but our prayers are not reduced to rubble.”

New Law Raises Alarm in India

In India, Christians in Punjab state are raising alarm over a newly strengthened “sacrilege” law that allows police to arrest individuals without a warrant for merely offending a Sikh. The “crime” includes incarceration with no bail and can carry penalties ranging from seven years to life in prison.

Even before the new law passed, pastors had already faced false accusations, arrests, and intimidation. Two Christian workers were arrested in 2023 after torn pages from a Sikh prayer book were found near their village. Both men denied any wrongdoing and were eventually released on bail. However, the men remain displaced and unable to return to their homes safely. One of the men nearly lost his life while in custody. They now struggle to feed their families and continue living under fear and legal pressure.

When asked how they got through, the men shared that they “refused to let go of hope.” They took a page from Paul and Barnabas — they prayed and read scripture together while in jail.

While Doors Are Still Open

For Christians living comfortably in the West, stories like these are a sobering reminder that millions of believers around the world pay a heavy price for following Christ.

As governments tighten restrictions and pressure against believers grows, many persecuted Christians are doing exactly what faithful believers have done for centuries: standing firm and continuing to proclaim the name of Jesus Christ.

Their example should challenge Christians everywhere. While doors remain open in the West, we have opportunities to witness, distribute Gospel tracts, support missions, and point people to Jesus Christ. The freedom to share Christ openly is a gift many believers around the world no longer have — and one Christians should not waste.










Ahead of signing, confusion swirls over Trump’s Iran deal


Ahead of signing, confusion swirls over Trump’s Iran deal



More than two months after negotiations began, and amid intermittent exchanges of fire, U.S. President Donald Trump says a signing ceremony for a framework agreement with Iran is expected to take place Sunday.

The agreement would not formally end the conflict but would instead establish another 60-day ceasefire period during which the sides would negotiate a final accord on Iran's nuclear program and other issues.

Tehran has not yet confirmed that the agreement will be signed Sunday. However, Pakistan, which has acted as a mediator, announced that the signing would take place "digitally," meaning both sides would sign remotely without a face-to-face ceremony.

The emerging agreement has sparked concern in Israel, where officials fear it may fail to eliminate the threats posed by Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs and could also restrict Israel's freedom of action against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Trump said Saturday that the signing ceremony would be held Sunday, although Iran has only said that a signing could take place sometime in the coming days.

According to Pakistan, technical-level talks between the sides are expected to begin this week following the digital signing ceremony.

Trump, who is also set to celebrate his 80th birthday Sunday with UFC fights on the White House lawn, is scheduled to depart Monday for the Group of Seven summit in France. Discussions there are expected to include implementation of the agreement and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz

According to reports, Trump is also expected to meet on the sidelines of the summit with leaders from Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and other Middle Eastern countries. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not been invited.

CNN reported Saturday that the original plan called for a more formal signing ceremony, similar to other historic diplomatic events. Trump said Thursday that Vice President JD Vance would attend the ceremony somewhere in Europe, reportedly in Geneva.
But people familiar with the matter told CNN that the plans changed because, under U.S. continuity-of-government protocols, the president and vice president do not travel abroad together. Since Trump is leaving for France on Monday, Vance's trip would have had to wait until Trump returned.
According to the report, some mediators feared that any delay could increase the risk of a last-minute collapse in the talks or a decision by either side to back away from the understandings already reached. The plans were therefore revised in recent days in favor of an online ceremony.





The First Battlefield In A Cultural Revolution:


The First Battlefield In A Cultural Revolution: Marxists Have Long Understood That Redefining Words Can Reshape The Culture



Political movements have long understood that language shapes culture. From the French Revolution to Marxist movements in Europe and Communist regimes in Asia, ideological leaders have sought to advance their agendas not only through political power but through linguistic change.

By redefining familiar terms, elevating preferred expressions, and marginalizing traditional language, they have attempted to reshape public understanding of reality itself. As George Orwell famously observed, the corruption of language often precedes the corruption of thought.

The latest example of the cultural Marxism that has infested blue states like New York is a bill awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s (D) signature — S.9316. Supporters describe it as a measure making technical revisions to New York family law. But it does far more than that. It raises a fundamental question: What happens when ideology replaces reality?

The bill is officially described as substituting “parentage” for “paternity and filiation” throughout state law. But among its most significant changes are the replacement of “mother” with “gestating parent” and “father” with “non-gestating parent.” For now, its focus is limited to state statutes, not greeting cards, so the Father’s Day card you purchased remains safe, for now.

If Governor Hochul signs the legislation, a number of gender-specific parental terms would be replaced with what supporters call gender-neutral language. Among the changes:

• “Mother” would become “gestating parent”
• “Father” would become “non-gestating parent” or simply “parent.”
• “Paternity” proceedings would become “parentage” proceedings.
• “Putative father” would become “alleged parent.”

As history repeatedly demonstrates, language matters. The question is not whether words shape culture; the question is who gets to define the words. Is replacing mother and father with “gestating parent” and “non-gestating parent” merely a technical modernization of legal terminology, or is it another step in the Left’s effort to further erase our understanding of God’s design for mankind?

The cultural Marxists of our day understand what revolutionaries throughout history have understood: if you can redefine words, you can reshape thought; if you can reshape thought, you can reshape culture. That is why language is always one of the first battlefields in a cultural revolution. And that is why motherhood and fatherhood must be replaced with sterile, mechanistic terms that strip away both meaning and design.

Ultimately, this is not an attack on words. It is an attack on one of the last great bulwarks standing in the way of their vision for society: the family as God created it. The cultural Marxists of our day are paving the way for their political agenda by weakening one of the primary institutions established by God for human flourishing. When a culture can no longer speak truthfully about mothers and fathers, it is well on its way to forgetting what they are.

More...