Thursday, March 12, 2026

Iran’s disinformation campaign unravels


Losing the war, losing the lie: Iran’s disinformation campaign unravels


When Iran’s missiles began flying on February 28, 2026, a second war was launched simultaneously, fought entirely with fabricated images, recycled videos, and outright lies. Within hours of the US-Israel strikes on Iran, Iranian state media flooded social platforms with battlefield “victories” that never happened, casualties that were invented, and dramatic footage pulled from video games in a coordinated disinformation operation on a scale that was simply staggering.

Since the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran, NewsGuard, the news rating organization that monitors media credibility, identified 18 war-related claims by Iranian sources that were provably false. In the two weeks before the US-Israel strikes, NewsGuard had flagged just five false claims from Iranian outlets. The volume of lies tripled almost overnight.

The Iranian state-controlled outlet Tehran Times posted a satellite image on X on February 28 purporting to show the destruction of a US radar installation at Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The caption was unambiguous: “An American radar in Qatar was completely destroyed today in an Iranian drone strike.” The image showed a dramatic before-and-after of the site. There was one problem. 

Information warfare analyst Tal Hagin traced the image back to a Google Earth photograph taken on February 2, 2025, a full month before the war began, that had been manipulated using AI. “One way to tell is that all the cars stayed in the exact same location,” Hagin wrote on X. The image had originated not inside Iran but from an X account called “Legitimate Targets” based in Austria.


Iranian state-linked sources also circulated a video on March 4 claiming to show a fighter jet shot down over Tehran, which Telegram channels linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) celebrated as evidence that Iran had downed a US F-15. The Israeli Air Force clarified that the footage was their own. It showed an Iranian Yak-130 being shot down over Tehran by an Israeli F-35. Iran’s propaganda had taken Israeli combat footage and repackaged it as an Iranian victory.

The semi-official outlet Mehr reported that four Iranian ballistic missiles struck the USS Abraham Lincoln, citing an IRGC statement as the source.

 US Central Command responded on March 1 with a flat denial: “The Lincoln was not hit. The missiles launched didn’t even come close.” 

Meanwhile, Tasnim, a military-aligned Iranian outlet, quoted an IRGC spokesperson claiming 650 US troops were killed or wounded in the first two days of fighting. CENTCOM confirmed that six US service members had been killed in the conflict, including troops killed in a March 1 Iranian drone attack on a US military facility at Port Shuaiba in Kuwait, a figure roughly 100 times smaller than what Iran was broadcasting to the world.



Iran plotting drone attack on California?


Iran plotting drone attack on California as retaliation for the war, terrifying FBI alert reveals


The FBI alerted California law enforcement to potential Iranian drone strikes on the West Coast in retaliation for the US war against the Islamic Republic.

'Iran allegedly aspired to conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles from an unidentified vessel off the coast of the United State Homeland, specifically against unspecified targets in California, in the event that the US conducted strikes against Iran,' the alert obtained by ABC News said. 

'We have no additional information on the timing, method, target, or perpetrators of this alleged attack,' the FBI update continued. 

The alert surfaced as the Trump administration continued its sustained offensive against Iran. This move follows a pattern of escalation in the Middle East, where the regime in Tehran has used drone warfare as a primary tool for retaliation. 

Both the FBI and the White House declined to comment for this story. 

Mexican drug cartel drone usage has also ticked up in recent months, raising the stakes for US border security and the safety of personnel operating in the region.

A government bulletin from September warned that an unverified tip indicated Mexican cartel bosses may have greenlit drone strikes targeting American law enforcement and military personnel along the southern border. 

The bulletin noted that while such an attack on US soil would mark a dramatic and historic escalation, officials considered the scenario plausible, even as they acknowledged cartels have historically steered clear of provocations likely to trigger a heavy response from Washington.

The warning provided no details on how drone-capable ships might approach the US coast.


Officials have remained wary for years that Tehran might 'forward-deploy' hardware in anticipation of a direct military confrontation with Washington or Jerusalem.

The drone threat comes as Iran launched a cyber offensive against one of the world's leading medical technology companies.

Michigan-based Stryker experienced a global outage on Wednesday, saying thousands of employees have lost access to work systems.

It employs approximately 53,000 people globally.


The company is a leading provider in advanced medical technologies that improve healthcare outcomes, including joint replacements, robotic-assisted surgical systems, trauma and neurotechnology products.

The Tehran-aligned Handala group issued a statement on Telegram, saying it wiped more than 200,000 systems and extracted 50 terabytes of data in retaliation for military strikes on Iran.


More...

The Most Misunderstood Third of the Bible:


The Most Misunderstood Third of the Bible

 Joe Hawkins


For a topic that occupies nearly a third of the Bible, the end times remain one of the most misunderstood areas of Scripture. Many Christians care deeply about God’s Word, attend church faithfully, and read their Bibles regularly, yet still feel uncertain when the conversation turns to prophecy. For some, the subject feels intimidating. For others, it feels divisive. For many, it simply feels overwhelming.

Conversations about the Rapture, the Tribulation, the Antichrist, the Millennium, or the eternal state can quickly become technical or emotionally charged. Instead of clarity, believers often walk away with more questions than confidence. But this confusion did not originate in Scripture itself. The Bible is not unclear about the future. The uncertainty has developed largely from how prophecy has been taught, presented, or avoided.

When something is fragmented, debated loudly, or treated as mysterious by default, sincere believers can begin to assume that it must be inaccessible. Over time, prophecy starts to feel like a specialized field reserved for scholars and chart-makers rather than something meant for the average Christian sitting in the pew.

Fragmented Teaching Produces Fog

For decades, believers have often encountered prophecy in fragments. A verse from Daniel is quoted. A passage from Revelation is referenced. A section of the Olivet Discourse is highlighted. While each piece may be true and meaningful on its own, the broader sequence and storyline are rarely explained clearly.

Charts are sometimes introduced before the narrative foundation is laid. Symbols are emphasized before their meaning is established. Timelines are debated before readers understand where those events fit within the larger redemptive story. The result is predictable: prophecy feels complicated and disjointed.

Yet Scripture never presents prophecy as an insider’s subject. Moses spoke of “the latter days” (Deuteronomy 4:30). The prophets repeatedly warned of “the day of the Lord” (Joel 2:1; Zephaniah 1:14). Jesus delivered extended teaching about future events on the Mount of Olives (Matthew 24–25). Paul instructed ordinary churches about the Lord’s return (1 Thessalonians 4:13–18; 2 Thessalonians 2:1–8).

Prophecy was not delivered to academic elites. It was given to shepherds, farmers, merchants, elders, young converts, and small congregations navigating real-world pressures. It was never meant to intimidate believers.It was meant to steady them.

Prophecy Was Given to Be Understood

God does not reveal the future to confuse His people. Throughout Scripture, prophecy functions as preparation, warning, and comfort. When God speaks about what is coming, He does so because He wants His people to be ready, not rattled.

Amos wrote, “Surely the Lord God does nothing, unless He reveals His secret to His servants the prophets” (Amos 3:7). Jesus told His disciples, “See, I have told you beforehand” (Matthew 24:25). Later He added, “These things I have told you before they come, that when they do come to pass, you may believe” (John 14:29). Prophecy strengthens faith by removing surprise. When events unfold exactly as spoken, belief is reinforced rather than shaken.

The book of Revelation begins not with obscurity, but with blessing: “Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written in it” (Revelation 1:3). That blessing assumes engagement and comprehension. God does not bless confusion; He blesses those who read, hear, and obey.

Unfortunately, many believers have quietly concluded that prophecy is too complex to grasp. Some were told it would all make sense later. Others were warned that studying the end times might lead to fear or speculation. As a result, entire congregations have grown up hearing very little systematic teaching about what Scripture says concerning the future.

Ironically, this avoidance has produced the very fear prophecy was meant to eliminate. Where God intended confidence, uncertainty has taken root. Where He intended watchfulness, indifference has grown.

What Happens When Prophecy Is Ignored

When prophecy is neglected, something essential is lost. The Bible’s story does not end with personal morality or private salvation alone. It culminates in restoration, justice, and the visible reign of Christ (Revelation 19:11–16; 21:1–5).

Peter described the prophetic word as “a light that shines in a dark place” (2 Peter 1:19). Prophecy provides a framework for interpreting the times. It does not eliminate darkness, but it gives direction within it.

When that framework is absent, believers attempt to interpret world events through headlines rather than Scripture. Wars intensify. Moral decay accelerates. Hostility toward biblical truth increases. Technological power expands rapidly. Without prophetic grounding, anxiety often fills the vacuum where understanding should be.

Jesus warned of “wars and rumors of wars” and increasing lawlessness (Matthew 24:6, 12). Paul described perilous times marked by deception and moral confusion (2 Timothy 3:1–5). Isaiah records the Lord declaring, “I am God… declaring the end from the beginning” (Isaiah 46:9–10). The future is not unfolding randomly. It is unfolding according to divine decree. When that truth is internalized, fear begins to loosen its grip.


How Confusion Took Root

The confusion surrounding the end times developed gradually. One significant cause is the tendency to approach prophecy without regard to sequence. Passages are grouped by topic rather than chronology. A verse from Revelation may be paired with one from Daniel and then connected to a statement from Jesus without explaining how they relate in time. The pieces are true, but the order is unclear, making the whole picture difficult to assemble.

Another factor is an overemphasis on symbolism without recognizing that Scripture frequently interprets its own imagery. Daniel was told the meaning of the beasts he saw (Daniel 7:16-18). Revelation identifies lampstands as churches, and stars as angels (Revelation 1:20). When everything is treated as mysterious or metaphorical, readers begin to wonder whether anything can be taken plainly.

Additionally, theological traditions that blur distinctions Scripture appears to maintain—particularly concerning Israel and the Church—can make the prophetic storyline harder to follow. Paul insisted that “the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable” (Romans 11:29). When that conviction is minimized, continuity in the narrative becomes difficult to trace.

Finally, debate fatigue has played a role. End-times discussions sometimes devolve into arguments over charts and dates. Jesus warned against date-setting (Matthew 24:36; Acts 1:7). Paul cautioned believers not to be “soon shaken in mind or troubled” (2 Thessalonians 2:2). For some, disengagement felt easier than navigating controversy. But avoidance leaves believers unprepared.

Chronology Changes Everything

One of the most effective ways to restore clarity is to read prophecy in chronological order. When Scripture is allowed to unfold sequentially, confusion begins to lift. Events build upon one another. Promises are fulfilled in stages. Judgment follows warning. Restoration follows wrath.

Daniel outlined a timeline of seventy weeks (Daniel 9:24–27). Jesus described birth pains leading to greater tribulation (Matthew 24:8–21). Revelation progresses through seals, trumpets, and bowls (Revelation 6–16). Chronology is not imposed upon the text; it emerges from it.

When read this way, prophecy becomes a coherent story rather than a collection of isolated predictions. The God who promised redemption in Genesis 3:15 completes it in Revelation 22:3-5. The covenant-keeping Lord fulfills His promises (Romans 11:25–29). Christ returns as King (Revelation 19:11–16). Scripture does not introduce a new plan at the end of time; it completes the one that has been unfolding from the beginning.

Prophecy Is Not About Fear

A persistent myth suggests that studying prophecy produces fear. In reality, fear thrives in uncertainty. Understanding produces stability.

Paul wrote, “God did not appoint us to wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Thessalonians 5:9). Jesus said, “When these things begin to happen, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near” (Luke 21:28). The tone of biblical prophecy toward believers is not terror but anticipation.

Yes, judgment is real. Yes, deception increases (2 Thessalonians 2:9-11). But evil does not triumph. Satan is defeated (Revelation 20:10). Christ reigns. Creation is restored. The end times are not the unraveling of God’s plan; they are its fulfillment.


More...


Parts of Beirut will ‘look like Gaza’ if Lebanon doesn’t stop Hezbollah, warns senior official


Parts of Beirut will ‘look like Gaza’ if Lebanon doesn’t stop Hezbollah, warns senior official

 Times of Israel is liveblogging Thursday










Lebanon’s Hezbollah says it launched missiles at a Military Intelligence base in the suburbs of Tel Aviv early Thursday, the Iran-backed terror group’s latest claim in a major operation against Israel it announced hours earlier.

Hezbollah operatives “targeted the Glilot base (the headquarters of the 8200 Military Intelligence unit)… in the Tel Aviv suburbs with a barrage of advance missiles,” the terror group says in a statement.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said earlier that they had carried out a joint missile operation with ally Hezbollah against targets in Israel.




As Hezbollah continues its rocket fire on Israel, a senior Israeli official tells The Times of Israel that Hezbollah strongholds will be destroyed unless Lebanon’s government acts.

“The Lebanese government needs to get a grip on their country,” says the official, “or Hezbollah parts of Beirut will soon look like Gaza.”




Hezbollah fires at least 150 rockets at north, Iran launches missiles in ‘integrated operation’


Hezbollah fires at least 150 rockets at north, Iran launches missiles in ‘integrated operation’'


Lebanese terror group Hezbollah blasted rockets and drones at northern Israel for hours, repeatedly sending hundreds of thousands of Israelis to shelters on Wednesday evening.

It marked the largest Hezbollah attack on Israel since hostilities intensified earlier this month, as the terror group began attacks to support its sponsor, Iran, which is under intense attack from a joint US-Israel air campaign that began on February 28.

An opening salvo of 100 rockets was launched around 8 p.m. as a missile from Iran targeted the central region of the country, in what Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said was a coordinated attack. More Iranian missiles targeted the north and south of the country.

The Iranian missiles were successfully intercepted by air defenses, which also worked to thwart the Hezbollah attacks. However, several impacts were reported, causing fires, and two people were lightly injured.

The Magen David Adom ambulance service said the two, a 35-year-old woman and a man in his 50s, were hit by “flying objects” following an impact. They were taken to a hospital.

According to rescue services, a rocket that struck a home in the northern town of Bi’ina injured one of the two victims. Four others were treated for acute anxiety at the scene.

As the Israel Defense Forces instructed residents of the north to stay close to shelters, Hezbollah continued firing rockets alongside drones, with sirens set off across the Galilee and in Haifa, as well as in communities up to 50 kilometers from the border with Lebanon.

In all, the terror group fired at least 150 rockets at the north over the course of several hours, according to IDF assessments.

A number of long-range rockets fired by Hezbollah also struck open areas. Because the rockets were heading for open areas, no sirens were activated by the military. Sounds of explosions were reported by residents of central Israel amid the attack.

Footage shows Hezbollah's large rocket barrage on northern Israel this evening. Around 100 rockets were fired, according to IDF assessments.

The attacks continued into early Thursday, with suspected drone infiltration and rocket alerts sounding in Nahariya and a number of Western Galilee communities, as well as Acre and some of Haifa’s northern suburbs. Hezbollah also fired long-range rockets, setting off sirens in Tel Aviv and surrounding towns, amid which the IDF announced the detection of an Iranian ballistic missile, which triggered alerts in central Israel, the Jerusalem area and parts of the south.

Some of projectiles were intercepted, according to initial military assessments. Police reported damage was caused by an impact in central Israel. Fragments following the interceptions also reportedly fell in several areas.

The IDF, meanwhile, launched heavy airstrikes on Hezbollah’s strongholds in southern Beirut, while an Israeli official said the military could begin hitting civilian infrastructure if the Lebanese government fails to rein in Iran-backed Hezbollah.

The IDF earlier warned that Hezbollah would likely attempt to increase its rate of rocket and drone attacks on Israel.

Hezbollah’s opening barrage of rockets was launched from several areas in Lebanon. The terror group, in a statement, said that “in response to the criminal aggression against dozens of Lebanese cities and towns and Beirut’s southern suburbs,” its fighters targeted sites in northern Israel “with dozens of rockets” as part of a new operation announced a short time earlier.

More....