Europe’s first mainstream political party to formally embrace an anti-Zionist position

On The October 7 Anniversary, The United Kingdom Advocates For Israel’s Eradication ‘From The River To The Sea’

Chris Katulka

On the third anniversary of October 7th, student organizers in London, England, are determined to hold a pro-Palestinian march through the city. The London Metropolitan Police urged them to choose another date, noting that the demonstration was deliberately planned for the anniversary of Hamas’s attack on Israel, warning about the impact it could have on Jewish students and staff.

This was also the timing around which the United Kingdom’s Green Party voted to adopt a “Zionism is racism” motion, in what the Jerusalem Post describes as “Europe’s first mainstream political party to formally embrace an anti-Zionist position.”

The resolution characterizes Israel as an “apartheid state” and supports replacing Israel with a single Palestinian state across “historic Palestine.” Jewish leaders and Israel’s Foreign Ministry condemned the decision as anti-Semitic, arguing that it denies the Jewish people’s right to national self-determination.

“The Green Party in Britain adopted a resolution equating Zionism with racism, legitimising armed struggle against Israel, and calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state ‘from the river to the sea’ – meaning the destruction of the State of Israel,” the Foreign Ministry emphasized. “The resolution constitutes a clear antisemitic text according to the IHRA definition, as it denies the Jewish people’s right to self-determination.”

Here’s my take.

I know that there are a lot of supporters of Israel in the United Kingdom, but activists like the student groups and the Green Party are drowning out their voices on the global stage.

There are 364 days to “advocate for Palestinians.” How out of touch with reality do you have to be to organize a pro-Palestinian march on October 7th or to call Zionism “racism” on the eve of the anniversary of Hamas’s attack that killed roughly 1,200 Israelis and saw more than 250 people taken hostage?

October 7 should be a day to remember the victims of one of the deadliest attacks on God’s chosen people since the Holocaust, not to use as a platform to minimize the suffering of the Jewish people.

EU Parliament set to call for naval presence in Taiwan Strait

EU Parliament set to call for naval presence in Taiwan Strait

Pietro Guastamacchia

The European Parliament will vote on Wednesday on a call for EU member states to increase naval presence in the Taiwan Strait and surrounding region.

The language is in the Parliament’s recommendation on EU-China relations, drafted by Renew MEP Hilde Vautmans and covering a wide range of bilateral issues between the EU and Beijing.

The text calls on the EU to “work with Member States on closer security coordination, including naval presence and joint exercises, to reinforce stability in the region”.

The language won’t pass unopposed. Left MEP Danilo Della Valle has tabled an amendment to remove the passage, meaning the reference to naval presence and exercises will face a split vote during Wednesday’s plenary.

Della Valle told Rapporteur the report risked pushing the EU towards a “militarist drift” in Asia, arguing that China should be treated as an international partner rather than a strategic rival.

Former Italian Army Chief of Staff Gen. Vincenzo Camporini told Rapporteurthat a European naval presence in the region would require a significant logistical effort, questioning whether European countries have the resources to sustain it.

He pointed to the difficulty Italy and other European countries are already facing in sending ships to the Bab el-Mandeb, calling a permanent European naval presence in the Far East “colossal wishful thinking”.

The vote comes as EU-China relations are hardening on the economic front.

France and Germany have urged the Commission to develop a new trade instrument that could allow Brussels to impose measures up to an “immediate cut-off” from the EU internal market in response to severe and systematic distortions. While China is not named in the Franco-German letter, the initiative is widely seen as being aimed primarily at Beijing.

The EPP strongly backs the report and has asked the EU to “show its muscles” in dealing with China. The text is expected to gain support from the Renew and ECR groups.

Socialists are split on the text, with the group holding a last-minute meeting Tuesday night to find common ground. The group now indicates that it is inclined to vote in favour, pushed by the Belgian, French, Dutch, German and Danish delegations. However, the two largest delegations, Italian and Spanish, are leaning towards abstention, as their respective leaderships consider the text too strongly worded, Socialist sources confirmed to Rapporteur.

The parliamentary text also links the proposed naval presence directly to Taiwan, calling for the EU to “work towards deterring China from escalating” and to develop contingency measures and scenario planning for “possible future developments around the island”.

The Taiwan issue has recently caused inter-institutional tensions in Brussels. In September, the European Commission withdrew from a conference organised by the European Parliament in Italy after Taiwan’s Vice Premier Hsiao Bi-khim was announced as a surprise guest, with Beijing reported to have complained to Rome and Brussels.

The final Parliament’s text insists that the EU should continue developing relations with Taiwan while maintaining its longstanding One China policy, and oppose unilateral changes to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea.

For the Taiwanese authorities, the text, if approved, is a positive sign.

“We greatly welcome the continued attention and support of our like-minded European partners, particularly their clear emphasis on the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and throughout the broader Indo-Pacific region,” Taiwanese Ambassador to Brussels Shieh Jhy-wey told Rapporteur.

Leo XIV to join over 300 leaders for "Spiritual Unification' at scandalous Assisi gathering

The sixth Assisi gathering will feature 384 religious representatives from 53 countries and promote what organizers describe as the ‘spiritual unification’ of the world

GaetanoMasciullo

Pope Leo XIV will travel to Assisi on October 27 to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the controversial interreligious prayer gathering launched by Pope John Paul II in 1986, together with representatives of the world’s religions

On October 6, a press conference organized by the Community of Sant’Egidio announced that the international meeting marking the 40th anniversary of the World Day of Prayer for Peace convened by John Paul II in 1986 will take place in Assisi from October 25 to 27. The event will bring together 384 representatives of religions, cultures, and institutions from 53 countries, with 155 speakers participating in 24 thematic forums. Pope Leo XIV will preside over the Christian prayer service in the Lower Basilica of St. Francis and will deliver the concluding address in the square in front of the basilica.

Marco Impagliazzo, president of the Community of Sant’Egidio, quoting the historian Alberto Melloni, stated that Assisi interreligious gatherings represent “a turning point in contemporary Catholicism’s attitude towards other religions, and a turning point in the vision that non-Christian religions have of Christianity.”

Over the course of the gathering, 13 separate venues will be used for simultaneous prayer by the different religious groups, which organizers say is intended to avoid the appearance of “religious syncretism,” in keeping with John Paul II’s original vision. At the conclusion of the meeting, participants are expected to sign and proclaim a joint message of peace addressed to the world.

In addition to the Pope, Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi will also be present, not only in his capacity as president of the Italian Bishops’ Conference but also as a leading figure within the Community of Sant’Egidio, as well as Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo, archbishop of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The gathering will feature Andrea Riccardi, the founder of the Community of Sant’Egidio; the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople; Nasaruddin Umar, Indonesia’s minister of Religious Affairs and imam of Jakarta’s mosque; and Hala al-Karib, a Sudanese activist. Chief Rabbi of France Haim Korsia will also be present.

On September 28, during the Pope’s apostolic journey through France, together with other representatives of religions, Korsia signed the Metz Appeal in the presence of Leo XIV, a document that echoes the “Spirit of Assisi” and once again proposes all religions as necessary instruments for “disarming” the world.

The topics of the 24 scheduled forums cover a broad range of issues, including disarmament, climate change, and migration. These discussion sessions will feature representatives of major secular and globalist organizations, foremost among them the Gates Foundation, as well as a number of secular intellectuals.

“The theme of the spiritual unification of the world is something that is truly important … to infuse a discourse on universal fraternity, Fratelli tutti, into different cultural and religious contexts,” Impagliazzo stated.

According to Impagliazzo, the “spiritual unification” of the world is necessary to counter the resurgence of nationalism, which he says is undermining the multilateralism promoted by international bodies such as the United Nations and the European Union. Religions, on his account, can serve as useful instruments in the hands of these institutions for reaffirming their vision of the world.

During the press conference, Impagliazzo also made critical reference to the objections raised by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre from the time of the first 1986 gathering: “I remember the Lefebvrists, the most ferocious critics … because it was believed that continuing these meetings would pose risks of turning the Church into a spectacle … or even of syncretism…. No syncretism: everyone according to their own traditions.”

On October 27, 1986, at the invitation of Pope John Paul II and with the close cooperation of the Community of Sant’Egidio, which decided not to limit the “Spirit of Assisi” to a one-time event, 130 representatives of various Christian denominations and world religions gathered in Assisi for the World Day of Prayer for Peace.

The event immediately provoked indignation in broad sectors of the Church. Among the most controversial episodes was the placementof a statue of Buddha on the tabernacle inside the Church of St. Peter in Assisi.

On October 28, 1999, John Paul II renewed the interreligious gathering with a new large assembly held between Rome and Assisi. On that occasion, Bishop Bernard Fellay of the Society of St. Pius X sent a formal letter of protest to the pontiff, denouncing the revival of a scandal that placed the one true Church founded by Christ on the same level as pagan and heretical religions.

With the election of Pope Benedict XVI, the Vatican hierarchy attempted to recalibrate ecumenical dialogue, but events such as his visit to Istanbul’s Blue Mosque on November 30, 2006, demonstrated substantial continuity with the line of the “Spirit of Assisi.”

On October 27, 2011, Benedict XVI convened the fourth Assisi interreligious meeting, to mark the 25th anniversary of the first prayer gathering. At this meeting, Pope Benedict decided to includeatheists and non-believers among the official guests invited to the Basilica of Saint Mary of the Angels.

On September 20, 2016, Pope Francis presided over the fifth interreligious gathering marking the 30th anniversary of the original event, bolstered in part by the significant influence of the Community of Sant’Egidio on the agenda and orientation of his pontificate.

Zelensky Calling for World War III Now

Zelensky Calling for World War III Now

Martin Armstrong

I warned from the start when Zelensky pretended to be elected, that this was the man the Neocons hand-selected to start World War III. At every possible oportunity, he has been desperately creating false flags, lying, and promoting even nuclear war where NATO should nuke Russia before Russia nukes Europe. Zelensky is claiming a commercial ship was sunk by Russia in NATO waters and therefore he wants the world to destroy Russia now. Any world leader you agrees with this nut-job, belongs in the same padded cell with him for life imprisonment. That is far worse than the death penalty.

This very week of October 5th that the computer has been targeting for geopolitical tension to begin to rise especially involving Russia, a commercial ship was sunk Tuesday the 6th after an apparent coordinated air-and-sea drone attack off NATO member Bulgaria coast, according to Zelensky. Of course, he blamed Russia and is insisting Moscow is preparing a “massive strike.” He advocates World War III with every breath he takes. The world should be destroyed all for he personal ethnic hatred of Russians.

Zelensky claims that a second vessel was also attacked inside Bulgaria’s exclusive economic zone He is insisting that Russia is preparing a dangerous escalation and possible “larger invasion posture.” Sources say he is advocating an immediate NATO attack to wipe out Moscow.

I cannot express how dangerous this guy is and the press keep cheering World War III. The only solace is that Ukraine will be destroyed and Zelensky will not survive to count his millions/billions. I strongly urge to get out of any investment whatsoever that has anything to do with Ukraine. NATO and the EU are desperate for war with the rising anti-war positions in Germany and France. They are ratcheting up tensions hoping for Russia to make the first move for if the trend in motion succeeds, then war will be off the table. They are trying so hard to beat the war drums before they lose power.

Professor Sergey Karaganov, honorary chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow, has publicly come out now and stated that as tensions with NATO rise, Russia MUST reinforce nuclear deterrence and remain ready to use its arsenal only as a last resort.

Our ECM model on this war directly turned in June 2026 warning that this would become more aggressive. In June 2026, the most significant event regarding Ukraine was a major escalation in Russian aerial attacks in response to Zelensky attacking inside Russia, which included a massive strike on Kyiv that damaged a UNESCO World Heritage site, followed by a European Council summit where EU leaders met with President Zelensky to discuss continued support.

The attack came two days after our model turned on the 13th. It was on June 15, 2026, when Russia launched one of its largest missile and drone bombardments of the war against multiple Ukrainian regions, including Kyiv, Kharkiv, and Dnipropetrovsk. This was when in response to the ongoing war, EU leaders gathered in Brussels for a two-day European Council summit on June 18-19, 2026, with President Zelensky attending in person. Europe went all in for world war III demonstrating that they never learned anything from World Wars I and II. No European leader is interested in peace and have no problem seeing Europe destory a third time.

The next critical turning point will be July 2027 following another Panic Cycle in May next year. We see this escalating into January and our Panic Cycle in Russia will be June of 2027. The computer has shown Ukraine flatlining. It does not appear to survive beyond the Pi target 2029-2030.

French Riots, Islamic Terrorism, and Civil War

French Riots, Islamic Terrorism, and Civil War

J.B. Shurk

The propaganda press continue to lie about the fiery riots spreading across France.  Both European and American outlets have described the violent insurrections as spontaneous gatherings of students who are upset about dilapidated, overcrowded schools and poor curricula.These descriptions reek of CNN’s attempt to portray Black Lives Matter and Antifa’s 2020 summer of mass arson, looting, and murder in the United States as “fiery but mostly peaceful protests.”  The BLM/Antifa attacks caused more property damage than any other riots in American history.

What’s going on in France could end up being much worse than the BLM/Antifa terrorism in the U.S.  French revolutionaries have been burning down schools and setting public buses and fire trucks ablaze.  They have looted shops and stalked and preyed on women walking alone.  They have attacked strangers with fireworks, mortars, and hydrochloric acid.  They have beaten numerous teachers, doused some in gasoline, and set a few on fire.  They have injured hundreds of law enforcement officers and firefighters, as well as students who want nothing to do with the mayhem. 

One witness to the destruction described the scene as “total anarchy” and “total war.”

While the propaganda press pretend that this war is merely a “student uprising,” pictures and video tell a different story.  The perpetrators/revolutionary soldiers are young, but most are not white.  They appear Middle Eastern or North African.  They chant, “We are all antifascists!”  They carry Hamas and other foreign flags.  Whether they are French citizens or not, these thugs have nothing but contempt for French authorities.

One murderous group kicked and beat a young female police officer for sport.  As the gang chased and tripped the trainee-cop to the ground, her attackers screamed, “Bitch!” and, “Kill her!”  They nearly succeeded.  Video of that incident prompted fierce open-borders-opponent Marine Le Pen to write, “The image of this young policewoman, pursued by a pack howling its hatred, thrown to the ground and assaulted, is unbearable.”

In another incident, attackers wearing masks and hoods chased, knocked down, and beat a police officer until he was unconscious.  The masked revolutionaries continued to kick the unconscious officer in the head and nearly killed him.  The local police union described the attempted murder bluntly: “This is no longer anti-cop hatred.  IT IS A HUNT FOR COPS.”

The propaganda press insist that these violent riots have nothing to do with anti-white racism or Islamic supremacy.  It is an unassailable fact, though, that almost every victim of these predatory attacks has been a white native of France.  French politician, pundit, and essayist Éric Zemmour argues, “This has nothing to do with bad school conditions.  Plain and simple.  These are ethnic riots, and demographics is destiny.  Without remigration, this is the fate of all Western European nations.”

Jordan Bardella, president of France’s National Rally political party, has called the riots “barbaric” and “an expression of extreme violence against representatives of the state, and of a hatred of France that we must fight without weakness.”

Regional authorities representing France’s Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur released this statement: “Mortar fire at staff, vehicle fires, gates torn down, stoning and intolerable intrusions: this is not protest….Those who burn our high schools are attacking the Republic.”

The regional president of Pays de la Loire, Christelle Morançais, wrote: “The same wreckers everywhere.  The same violence everywhere.  The same political exploitation everywhere.  This is not the youth of France.”

Over at The Federalist, John Daniel Davidson writes, “The riots in France last week stand as a warning to the United States and all western countries: mass immigration will split your country in two, and the two sides will eventually go to war.”

If these violent riots are not the first battles in a French civil war, then they are at least a dress rehearsal for the main event.  As Zemmour and Davidson argue, what is happening in France will eventually spread across the West.

British political activist, writer, and free speech advocate Paul Weston posted a disturbing assessment of the dangers that loyal citizens of the United Kingdom face:

“Just to make you fully aware of our position as white Brits living in Britain: 250,000 armed Islamic men could wipe out most of the population of Britain within 48 hours.  Communism and Islam killed millions in the 20th century.  Our current Home Secretary is a revolutionary communist and Islamic fundamentalist.  She is now engaged in importing weapons trained Palestinians and Afghans.  250k possible Afro-Islamic soldiers illegally crossed the channel over the last few years and now reside, at vast government expense, in military barracks and hotels strategically placed across the country.”

On Sunday, for instance, British police officers cleared the streets of an entire town and confined residents to their homes, so that they could assist foreign nationals arriving on another illegal migrant boat from France.  Strikingly, this police action occurred in the Royal Navy harbor towns of Gosport and Portsmouth, where many patriotic British veterans live.  A Reform UK member of the Hampshire County Council, George Madgwick, called it “heartbreaking” and further evidence that “Britain is broken.”  

British authorities went out of their way to restrict the freedoms of patriotic Brits, while aiding human traffickers in their smuggling operations.  Securing the pipeline of military-aged Muslims moving from France to the U.K. is apparently more important than securing Britain’s borders and keeping the kingdom’s people safe.

Weston observes that the British government has spent an enormous amount of time and money moving an army inside of the kingdom that puts the British people in an incredible amount of danger. 

The “conditions DO exist for mass slaughter,” and the government is responsible.  Weston believes the outrageous expense and massive logistical considerations required to transport so many hostile foreign nationals into the United Kingdom suggest that authorities are intentionally and malevolently endangering the public

Although the propaganda press have defended Hamas terrorists as “freedom fighters” and “soldiers,” they are nothing of the sort.  They are vile rapists, torturers, and mass murderers.  Forced to confront the efforts of complicit members of the press to hide “the horrors that Hamas carried out,” Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu released a small sample of gruesome photographs three years ago that showed “babies murdered and burned by the monsters of Hamas.”