Friday, October 30, 2026

'The globalists have launched a coup in Poland': Police move against top court amid 'constitutional crisis'


'The globalists have launched a coup in Poland': Police move against top court amid 'constitutional crisis'



Prime minister waits until president is absent, dispatches ranks of cops to courthouse

Poland, often considered one of the more stable and more conservative nations across the landscape of Europe, sudden has been wracked by what could be an attempted coup.

It was Prime Minister Donald Tusk who waited until President Karol Nawrocki was out of the country, heading to Senegal, when he dispatched police to take over the operations of the nation's top constitutional court, the Constitutional Tribunal.

As of late Friday, Nawrocki was on his way back, having ordered his plane to turn around, and violence was developing at the court.

According to Just the News, "Poland appears to be in a state of constitutional crisis."

COUP UNDERWAY IN POLAND! PM Donald Tusk has just sent police to storm Constitutional Tribunal building in Warsaw in the middle of the night.

Tusk waited until President Karol Nawrocki left the country before ordering the police takeover. Nawrocki was halfway to Senegal when he abruptly turned his plane around and rushed back to Poland to confront the unfolding crisis. The EU, which backs Donald Tusk, has STILL NOT issued a statement on this unprecedented crisis or condemned the attempted coup.

Reports revealed a "de facto power struggle" had erupted.

"For now, the outcome of this confrontation remains uncertain. Judge Anna Korwin-Piotrowska called the police to the grounds of the Constitutional Tribunal, citing a potential threat to the safety of judges and staff. Police did not enter the building, but a significant number of officers have been deployed in the surrounding area. Korwin-Piotrowska suspended Tribunal President Bogdan Święczkowski and his deputy, Bartłomiej Sochański, for one month, temporarily taking charge of the institution herself," reports explained.

The moves amounted to a "coup," critics charged.

The fight has been between the current pro-European government and an opposition party, the Law and Justice organization.

There are accusations politicians have been influencing court rulings.

More...


Media Silent As 130 Christians Slaughtered In 3 Different Countries


Media Silent As 130 Christians Slaughtered In 3 Different Countries
JOSHUA ARNOLD


The past week was one of the most fatal for Christians around the world in recent memory. From Nigeria to Ethiopia to Jordan, gunmen slaughtered more than a hundred Christians. The somber news reminds Christians in America of the urgent need our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ face every day. It also accentuates the stakes in Tuesday's election.

On Friday, gunmen attacked a Christian community in northeastern Nigeria, firing on people as they fled into a river. At least 62 people were killed in the attack, 52 were wounded, and thousands fled their homes. In the past decade, Islamist militants have killed tens of thousands of Christians in Nigeria.

Also on Friday, three unnamed terrorists opened fire at Christians gathered for a funeral outside St. George's Greek Orthodox Church in the village of Hmoud, east of the Dead Sea. Jordanian authorities have suspects in custody, making this the only one of the three attacks where government authorities have acted to protect Christians.

On Saturday, Ethiopian Orthodox Christians in the Oromia state suffered a series of attacks in which more than 60 people were killed, including five children, and 20 houses were burned to the ground. One survivor described it as an ambush, in which the attackers surrounded their victims on all sides.


A local official blamed the attacks on a rebel coalition, Alliance for Survival, which includes the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA). However, according to Christian Emergency Alliance, "surviving witnesses claimed regional authorities collaborated with Islamist militias to carry out the massacre."

All three attacks came the weekend before International Religious Freedom Day (October 27), and also shortly before the U.S. midterm elections.

Fortunately, international religious freedom still finds supporters in both parties -- far more than pro-life or pro-marriage positions. For instance, a bipartisan bill to reauthorize the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) passed the Senate unanimously on September 30.

However, the parties do vary in the intensity of their commitment to international religious freedom.

The Riots In France Expose The Dangerous Fiction That Public Spending And 'Integration' Create A Peaceful Society


The Riots In France Expose The Dangerous Fiction That Public Spending And 'Integration' Create A Peaceful Society



The violence, looting and burning in France over the weekend of October 24th-25th was somewhat less intense and widespread than it had been on the previous weekend, but it was still significant. Demonstrations comprising an estimated 400,000 people took place across France on the Saturday; in Paris the march was confined to the south-eastern edge of the city, and this was followed by violent clashes with police near Porte de Vincennes, about a 45-minute walk from the Place de la Bastille. Water cannon and tear gas were used. Around 500 rioters were estimated to have broken off from the main protest. There were more clashes, as well as bin fires and looting in Marseille, Lyon, Bordeaux, Lille, Toulouse, Nantes, Grenoble, Rennes and several other parts of France. There were around 1,000 arrests nationwide (1,300 by some reports), with 70,000 police having been deployed to the streets, which was a substantial increase on the previous weekend's deployment. Activists have called for further action on October 31st, and it's clear that the sentiment behind the unrest hasn't gone away. The weather on the 31st is forecast to be mild and dry, more similar to that of the 17th than the wetter, colder 24th, so it remains to be seen how much the tensions have been defused, and to what extent the less dedicated were put off by the weather.

There are two competing narratives in the media (mainstream and alternative) about the motivations for the unrest, and indeed the nature of the unrest. On the one hand, this is a 'mostly peaceful' expression of the French people's frustration with public services. It started with teachers and students protesting against the underfunding of schools, and has widened to express a broader discontent with austerity measures and the economy in general. On the other hand, this is a violent ethno-religious-communist uprising trying to bring down the French state and overturn French society.

Legacy media would have you believe the first of these is true, given the footage they're showing and the voiceovers they're providing. Just a brief sojourn into X, Rumble or YouTube will have you come away convinced of the second. Interestingly, the French political Establishment seems to be more aligned with the insurrection view than the peaceful protest view. Less than a week before the first outbreak of violence, Jean-Luc Mélenchon of La France Insoumise('France Unbowed') was calling for the formation of a Sixth Republic of 'popular power'. On October 22nd, addressing the nation, Macron referred to "political and even seditious acts carried out by organized ultra-Left groups whose aim is to bring down the Republic". Laurent Nuñez, France's Interior Minister, referred to "very high levels of violence" and "militants of the ultra-Left movement, of the extreme far Left". Although they're comfortable calling out the black bloc activists that can be seen on the streets, they're ignoring the Islamic slogans and the ethnic composition of many of the perpetrators that the rest of us can see on X.

These two narratives are not mutually exclusive. There is both a mass peaceful demonstration against perceived underinvestment in public services and a violent uprising from an alliance of convenience of anti-Western forces. In this sense, there is an opportunity to use France as an object lesson on this side of the channel. It is a lesson we have been refusing to learn from our own situation, and which has been offered to us grindingly slowly in our own politics and on our streets: the techno-managerial social democratic project rests on a utopian fiction. If we are interested in preserving our civilization, then we really must start paying attention.

In Britain, across almost all of the EU and into the Anglosphere (possibly excepting the United States), the fiction goes something like this: if the state can hoover up just the right amount of money and distribute it correctly through services and benefits, guided by experts and technocrats, eventually we will achieve a settled, prosperous society. The system is imperfect, but perfectible. All that it needs is just the last tax increase, the ideal budget, or a carefully planned management structure, and all will be well. It's just over the horizon, but the direction of travel is the right one. It must be, because that's how we planned it. In the meantime, all of this will be improved by importing human capital from far-flung parts of the world. Since culture and tribalism are essentially artificial, this will be a success as soon as we achieve something called integration.

Many reading this will doubtless already have concluded that this is indeed a dangerous fiction. The interesting thing is that our political, media and institutional class don't seem to be able to look across the channel and see the urgent evidence of the delusion.

If it really were a case of the right amount of resources being allocated through the state, then surely France would be closer to nirvana than we are in Britain? French public sector spending accounts for around 57% of the country's GDP. Social spending - that is, cash benefits and in-kind services for old age, health, family, unemployment, incapacity, housing, and so on - accounts for fully 30% of GDP. This compares to 49.4% and 28% state expenditure and social spending respectively for Germany, 47% and 23% for the UK and 37% and 19.8% for the US. In Communist China, the state accounts for around 33% of GDP and 10-13% is spent on social benefits. In the USSR in 1988, something like 51% of spending was by the state; roughly 15-20% was social spending (these last two are necessarily estimates, because the data are neither easily available nor reliable).




Hackers Hit Hundreds of French Supermarkets, Destroying Food by Taking Control of Refrigeration Systems


Hackers Hit Hundreds of French Supermarkets, Destroying Food by Taking Control of Refrigeration Systems


Hackers remotely took control of supermarket refrigeration systems across France, causing freezers to heat up, destroying food and reportedly starting fires. The attack raises serious questions about how vulnerable America’s own food supply is to cyberattacks.

Hackers managed to do something this weekend that should concern anyone who depends on a grocery store to feed their family. They remotely accessed refrigeration systems at hundreds of French supermarkets, forced the equipment into continuous defrost cycles, and reportedly pushed temperature settings as high as 122°F. By Monday morning, October 12, stores were dealing with ruined meat, dairy products, frozen food and, in some locations, reports of fires.

According to AFP, between 150 and 200 Intermarché supermarkets and nearly 100 Coopérative U locations were targeted. Other chains, including E.Leclerc, were also reportedly affected. French authorities have opened an investigation, and the full extent of the damage is still being determined.

The hackers reportedly exploited older refrigeration-control software from Danish manufacturer Danfoss. Rather than shutting the equipment off, they manipulated its defrost function, which normally runs for short periods to prevent ice buildup. The systems were instead forced to keep heating.

In Haguenau, a town in northeastern France, local supermarkets reportedly suffered hundreds of thousands of dollars in spoiled inventory. Across the country, losses could reach millions.

This wasn’t somebody stealing credit card numbers or breaking into a retailer’s customer database. Someone sitting behind a computer was able to interfere with physical equipment in hundreds of stores, destroying food that people depend on.

Most people have no idea how much of the modern food supply depends on internet-connected equipment. Refrigeration systems in supermarkets, warehouses and food-processing facilities can be monitored and controlled remotely. That makes maintenance easier, but it also creates another way for someone to interfere with the equipment.

Security researchers have been warning about these vulnerabilities for some time.

Researchers at Claroty’s Team82 identified security weaknesses in refrigeration controllers manufactured by Danfoss and Copeland. During testing, they demonstrated how attackers could manipulate refrigeration equipment and interfere with temperature readings.

Both manufacturers released firmware updates addressing identified security problems. But releasing an update and getting every supermarket, warehouse and refrigeration contractor to install it are two very different things.

Some of these systems have been operating for years, and stores may have little reason to replace equipment that appears to be working properly. Remote access originally installed for maintenance can also become a security problem when passwords aren’t changed or software isn’t updated.

We’ve already seen what happens when someone abuses that access. In the Netherlands, a former refrigeration contractor employee was sent to prison after using old login credentials to interfere with a supermarket’s refrigeration equipment.

The difference this time is the scale. Instead of one disgruntled employee targeting a single store, attackers in France managed to disrupt refrigeration across hundreds of locations.

A coordinated attack against hundreds of stores, distribution warehouses or food-processing facilities could become a serious supply problem.

When refrigeration fails, stores cannot simply turn the equipment back on and start selling everything again. Once perishable food has been held at unsafe temperatures, much of that inventory has to be discarded.

Replacing it takes trucks, functioning warehouses, available inventory and suppliers capable of filling new orders. If enough facilities are affected at once, replacements could be difficult to find.

And the potential problems don’t end with spoiled groceries. Refrigerated medications and other temperature-sensitive supplies depend on many of the same kinds of cooling and monitoring systems.

iPhone Dystopia: Age Verification Baked Into IOS 27.2 Using Camera


iPhone Dystopia: Age Verification Baked Into IOS 27.2 Using Camera


It’s just one step closer to dystopia as Apple caves to government pressure for age verification. It lets Apple play in major markets around the world: Australia, Brazil, England, and South Korea. But it will also be used in the United States. Facebook uses a selfie to prove age to get a “verified age” badge, but that is an app; Apple baked it into the operating system.

Here are Apple’s claims:

  • The selfie “isn’t accessible to anyone, not even Apple.”
  • “Once your age is confirmed, your selfie is deleted and isn’t retained in any form.”
  • Apple says PCC data is encrypted in transit and deleted afterward.

However, a user’s picture is sent to Apple’s cloud servers to be processed, where the data points remain. The picture is not needed at that point and can be deleted.

Governments can now mandate that Apple turn the feature on regardless of which apps are installed on the phone. Secondarily, governments can mandate that the apps access the feature before granting to access to their services. ⁃ Patrick Wood, Editor.



When Apple released iOS 27.2 on Sunday, it crossed a threshold no major operating system had crossed before: embedding a government-compelled biometric age gate directly into the OS layer itself — not inside an app, not inside a browser, but in the platform that every app runs on top of. 



South Korea is also part of the five-country rollout, but Apple’s selfie-based facial scan is not available there — South Korean users face annual carrier-verified identity checks instead. Adults who fail or decline the facial scan do not get a different app or a competing service; they get a permanently restricted device — or they get a different phone.


That architectural choice — OS-level rather than app-level — is the fact that makes iOS 27.2’s biometric gate different from every prior age-verification rollout in the industry, and it is the fact Apple’s public documentation downplays. Once this plumbing is baked into the operating system, every future government mandate that wants to require it will find Apple’s infrastructure already installed. That is not a side effect. It is the point.

Apple’s own support documentation describes the process as a liveness check more than an identity interrogation. Users are instructed to perform a deliberate four-angle head rotation — right, left, up, down — capturing their face from multiple perspectives. Apple advises removing anything that might obscure a result: masks, hats, sunglasses. The company calls the underlying technology an “age-estimation model,” not a facial recognition or identity-matching system, which is a meaningful distinction: estimation predicts a probabilistic age range from facial geometry rather than matching the face to a database record.


Apple promises the selfie “isn’t accessible to anyone, not even Apple,” and that “once your age is confirmed, your selfie is deleted and isn’t retained in any form” per its selfie verification support page. Users who are not cleared as adults are directed to try again with a fresh selfie, or to use an alternative: a credit card on file, Apple ID account-history signals, or a government-issued ID scan.


What distinguishes Apple’s implementation is architectural: not inside a single app or website, but embedded in the operating system itself. A user who dislikes Meta’s video selfie requirement can stop using Facebook. A user who dislikes Apple’s iOS 27.2 age scan cannot stop using the App Store without giving up iOS. The failure mode at this level is not correctable by switching apps; it is correctable only by switching platforms.





More...