Israel’s Existence Today Confirms That God’s Prophetic Clock Is Ticking

Israel’s Existence Today Confirms That God’s Prophetic Clock Is Ticking

Barry Stagner

Amos 9:14-15 reads, “I will bring back the captives of My people Israel; they shall build the waste cities and inhabit them; they shall plant vineyards and drink wine from them; they shall also make gardens and eat fruit from them. I will plant them in their land, and no longer shall they be pulled up from the land I have given them, says the Lord your God.”

The point Amos makes for us is crucial to understanding the prophetic timeline of the last days. Though Amos was a contemporary of Hosea and Isaiah, we know that what Amos wrote in chapter 9 of his prophecy does not pertain to the return of the Jewish captives from Babylon to Jerusalem. We know this because what he describes did not happen. The Jews did return from their Babylonian captivity; they did build the waste cities, plant vineyards and gardens, and eat and drink from them. But they were “pulled up” from the land for nearly 2,000 years. This reveals that Amos’s prophecy was not fully fulfilled in the past. Therefore, the complete fulfillment is yet future.

We are living in the days when this is being fulfilled. The national people group with the ethnic identity, language, heritage, and history of the Biblical Jews are now back in the land, and this has begun the fulfillment of what Amos wrote. This means no matter how various world governments and the UN may try to uproot Israel from the land, God Himself will not allow that to happen. The reason this is crucial to the prophetic timeline is that the promise is specific to an identifiable people group who are the second most significant figures in Scripture, the Jews.

If the Jews weren’t to return from being scattered amongst the nations, and they weren’t brought back into the same geographic region of the world in which Jerusalem is located, then God would not have kept His promises to them, and that would be catastrophic for us all

For those who claim that modern Israel is not Biblical Israel, I would ask: Then why is everything written about Biblical Israel by the prophets happening to the modern state of Israel? Why is the world gathered against her? Why are there efforts to divide the city of Jerusalem? Why is the city a burdensome stone to all the nations?

The fact is, Israel’s existence today confirms the fulfillment of prophecies that tell us God’s prophetic clock is moving toward its foretold end. Israel is the timepiece by which last-days events can be measured.

Gabriel told Daniel there is coming a seven-year period for his people and Jerusalem that is yet unfulfilled. It requires the Jews to be a national people group, that they be in Israel, and that they have possession of all of Jerusalem. All these things have taken place within the span of a single generation, and that generation is coming to an end. 

Lord Christopher Monckton: “The CO2 storyline has purely been the pretext which they are using in order to establish a global government”

Lord Christopher Monckton: “The CO2 storyline has purely been the pretext which they are using in order to establish a global government”

Rhoda Wilson

In 2015, Lord Christopher Monckton exposed that, since the early 1990s, the “evidence” for anthropogenic climate change has been spurious.  He also explained the real agenda behind the climate change alarmist narrative.

“This entire process of saying there is a global problem that requires the West to shut down itself and to subsidise the rest of the world is a double whammy … They’ve been trying to achieve this at the UN for a long time,” he said.

“Only four years after the IPCC had been set up … already, the UN was planning to use [climate change] as a way of making itself into a global government … The CO2 storyline has purely been the pretext which they are using in order to establish a global government.”

To be able to establish a One World Government, “They had to say there was a global problem and only global action can solve it.  That’s why they chose CO2,” he said.

Lord Christopher Monckton is a former prime ministerial adviser on scientific and domestic policy to Margaret Thatcher, journalist and inventor of the mathematical puzzle ‘Eternity’.  Read more HERE and HERE.  

In the interview below, Lord Monckton, a hereditary peer who is not permitted a seat in the House of Lords, revealed that the “global warming” and “climate change” agenda is a totalitarian communist plot to establish a global socialist government and destroy Western freedom.

He argued that the climate agenda is not about science, but – after Russia and China were bribed to get on board with the UN’s programme – is instead a narrative used by entities funded by Russia and China to impoverish Western economies, dismantle capitalism and enforce authoritarian control through international bureaucracies like the UN.

When asked if they would succeed in installing a One World Government, Lord Monckton said, yes, but it won’t last. “We will get our global government, everybody will end up hating it, and gradually it will be dismantled,” he said.

Global warming, he said, “has effectively become a new religion, or I would call it a superstition [because] it definitely isn’t true and you can prove it, but people still adhere to it … This is the largest transfer of wealth in human history from the poor to the rich; from the little guy to the big guy … This is an enrichment and an empowerment of the powerful governing class at the expense of the rest of us … Gradually, one by one, the people are waking up to this – the people have largely seen through this global warming scam for the scam that it is.”

More...

What's Really Behind The AI Panic

What's Really Behind The AI Panic...

Mark E. Jeftovic

Just heading into mid-September, a purported moral panic broke out amongst the frontier AI leaders that their own products were "too dangerous" and so the only remedy would be for the government to regulate all AI models

Weeks earlier, Bernie Sanders had introduced The Ban AI-Superintelligence Act, that would make it illegal to create an AI model that was more intelligent than humans, going so far as to prescribe a 20-year prison term for any person who did and the "corporate death penalty" for companies.

Sanders' Bill is truly the domain of dystopian sci-fi. It reminded me of an episode from the ill-fated Twilight Zone reboot ("Examination Day") which culminated in a distraught couple mourning their child, who had just been exterminated by the state for testing too high on his pre-adolescent IQ test.

It all started with a "resignation in public" tweet from one Jacob Coxon, an Anthropic employee, on September 8th posted his parting thoughts on X, stating that AI could exterminate humanity within 10 years.

One of Anthropic's trust and safety leads, Evan Hubinger, then endorsed the tweet, citing a "non-zero chance" of 10% or more that such an outcome was possible.

That original resignation tweet, now closing in on 200 million views, which emanated from a heretofore unknown X account, less than a year old, with no followers, and two name changes in the last six months went absolutely viral - with some well-timed, fortuitous boosting from some of the biggest "AI Alignment" personalities on the internet, and then the Wall Street Journal came out with an "exclusive" on the story, ....which actually went live on the WSJ site 18 minutes before Coxon's tweet.

Before long Sam Altman said we "definitely" need more government regulation on AI and even Elon Musk chimed in and agreed that the frontier labs should be reviewing each other's models for safety.

Within days a full-blown hysteria was underway - for me it bore all the hallmarks of mass formation psychosis or at least a well-organized attempt to manufacture one.

Within a week, King Charles was speaking at an AI Safety summit at Buckingham Palace, urging government oversight and increased regulation of AI...

"Surely we need sufficient means of control before it is all too late?" the King ruminated.

Also, that guy behind him, looking rather pleased with himself, is "Tino" Cuéllar, Anthropic's Chief Global Affairs Officer.

The "AI Safety Summit" itself was announced on September 7th, leaked via Politico - the day before the Coxon tweet that ignited what had become at this point, a global(ist?) furor.

Even the Pope weighed on AI safety, and not to be left behind, Bill Gates hit the Sunday talk circuit this past weekend with another doozy of a soundbite:

"AI is powerful enough to cause a billion deaths" - which means we need to turn control of it over to politicians and a new class of global inspectors."

Several things about this relatively sudden AI panic did not pass the smell test, among them, the facts emerging around Coxon himself, who had "barely been at the company long enough to find the bathroom" (as the All-In guys put it), turned out to be neck-deep in the "Effective Altruism" movement, a well-connected network of young WEF types, which espoused global governance over potentially harmful technologies like AI.

Several things about this relatively sudden AI panic did not pass the smell test, among them, the facts emerging around Coxon himself, who had "barely been at the company long enough to find the bathroom" (as the All-In guys put it), turned out to be neck-deep in the "Effective Altruism" movement, a well-connected network of young WEF types, which espoused global governance over potentially harmful technologies like AI.

He had received scholarships and grants from the EA Infrastructure Fund, the Long Term Future Fund and was a fellow at the Newspeak House in London (yes, newspeak).

Who are the Effective Altruists?

Effective Altruism (EA) is a movement that purports to "use evidence and quantitative reasoning to identify the most consequential problems and direct resources toward reducing them".

Love the euphemistic language (it's actually what ChatGPT will use when you ask it). The punch line for the EA raison d'être is, as usual, a society ordered under expert, technocratic management - their expertise, their management.

One of their earlier recruits was Sam Bankman-Fried, whose FTX empire was run by a cadre of EAs at the top and who seed-funded Anthropic as the lead investor with $500M of a $580M Series B round in 2021.

We've all seen this movie before, with global warming, then with Bitcoin mining (causing more global warming) and now, AI exterminating humanity.

The common through-line is that the "problem" is some unfalsifiable calamity that could happen someday and for which the only logical response is to put a bunch of globalist technocrats in charge of... well, everything.

What people didn't seem to understand, then or now - is that the problem isn't really about the problem - I've long reported on proposals that would make personal choice and individual liberty things of the past, because letting people think for themselves would be "too dangerous" for the problem at hand.

Global warming meant personal carbon quotas, limits on travel, even living space, according to some "degrowth" advocates, how many new outfits you could buy.

The panic around Bitcoin mining wasn't about that, it was about energy - and who gets to decide how much you'reallowed to consume and what you can use it for.

Bitcoin mining today, Netflix tomorrow. Why not? Once you concede oversight to some external authority for one form of energy use, you've tacitly done so for all of them.

The problem that politicians and aspiring technocrats see with AI is that it grants the rabble cognitive superpowers.

More specifically, open-source AI does.

Frontier models are proprietary. They have guardrails, training biases and actively scan and filter your conversations for potential safety issues. It's arguably their purview to do so.

But it's the open-source software movement that is the unfiltered Promethean agent here and just you wait - we'll soon see what the ultimate target of this AI Doom cult really is: open-source LLMs.

That is why the frontier labs are gleefully courting government oversight - not because their own products are "too dangerous" (if so, then why are you going public?) but because oversight instantly creates an AI oligopoly - a cartel, namely Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI, on the inside - and everything else, effectively outlawed - at least that would be the preferred outcome.

More...

The US Debt Market Is Screaming Red Alerts … and the Worst Is Yet to Come

The US Debt Market Is Screaming Red Alerts … and the Worst Is Yet to Come

Mike Adams

The traditional foreign buyers of US debt are vanishing, auctions are failing, and yields are being forced upward by the sheer math of supply and demand. The debt market is many times larger than the stock market, so when the government has to choose, I believe it will sacrifice the currency and even the stock market to protect Treasuries. That means your dollars, your savings, and your purchasing power are all in the crosshairs.

The signals are now unmistakable. The US dollar index has collapsed more than 10% in just twelve months, a flashing red alert for anyone paying attention to systemic failure ^[1]. This is not a simple devaluation; it is a double-losing scenario where the dollar is losing value against other currencies while inflation erodes its domestic purchasing power. As I wrote previously, the US has crossed the $40 trillion national debt threshold, and the interest on this debt exceeds Medicare and Medicaid expenditures ^[2]. The government sustains this system through continuous money printing and clever forms of debt creation, but the endgame is approaching. I believe the worst is yet to come, and the window to prepare is closing fast.

In this article, I will lay out exactly why the usual buyers have walked away, why stablecoins and the Fed are not a lasting solution, why this inflation is structural and cannot be fixed by rate hikes, and how the rollover trap will lead to a currency collapse. I will also share what I am doing personally to protect assets, because I am not waiting for the Fed or politicians to save us.

The foundation of the US debt market has always been foreign buyers. For decades, countries like China, Japan, and Saudi Arabia purchased Treasuries as a safe store of value and as part of geopolitical arrangements. That era is over. China is dumping Treasuries rather than funding a rival empire; Japan is selling to shore up its own bond market. As I have noted, Japan, the largest foreign holder of US debt, faces a severe domestic debt crisis that threatens global financial stability. Surging Japanese bond yields are forcing Japanese investors to repatriate capital, potentially triggering a massive selloff of US Treasuries ^[3]. This comes at a precarious time for the United States, which is already paying over $1 trillion in interest annually.

Europe's economy has been devastated by the Nord Stream attack, and its leaders have little reason to buy US debt. The European Union now resembles the Soviet Union in its centralized planning and economic mismanagement ^[4]. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia's petrodollar-for-security arrangement is dead after the US refused to defend it against the Houthis.

When the biggest historical buyers stop bidding, yields must rise -- there is no way around that math. As I have explained, the debt market is far larger than the stock market and is crucial to global finance. US Treasury bonds serve as a key liquidity provider for the global economy, but this system has become less sustainable because there are now far fewer buyers willing to purchase these securities ^[5].

The US Treasury market recently experienced its worst day in six months as a disastrous auction of 30-year Treasury bonds sent long-maturity yields soaring, as investors demanded additional compensation for funding a ballooning fiscal deficit ^[6]. This is what happens when the buyers walk away. The US is caught in a debt spiral with no easy way out, and the problem is multifaceted but stems from runaway government spending. While it typically spikes during crises, spending has increased at an alarming rate even outside of crisis periods. Tax revenues are not keeping up, leading to ever-deepening deficits ^[7]. This is not a temporary disruption; it is the beginning of the end of the dollar's hegemony.

more...

Hawley says Flock 'safety' cameras are creating a massive searchable database

Hawley says Flock 'safety' cameras are creating a massive searchable database of people's public surveillance

Hayden Cunningham

Senator Josh Hawley revealed that Flock Safety’s AI-powered camera network can capture images of people inside their vehicles and that the company’s database can be searched for the presence of specific people in images. Hawley detailed the findings during a Senate hearing last week, calling it “quite extraordinary.”

During a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing on September 23, Hawley highlighted the broad capabilities of Flock’s camera network. He pointed out that the cameras can collect images that can be searched using artificial intelligence for characteristics including vehicle make, model, color, location, date and time, dents, roof racks, bumper stickers, and other features.

“Flock can tell you if a car has a Trump sticker or a Harris sticker or a pro-life America sticker or an NRA sticker,” Hawley said. “Flock cameras can even recognize whether people are in the images, and in fact, Flock admitted in a letter to me ahead of this hearing that you can search their database based on people’s images. You can ask to search people.”

“This is really quite extraordinary,” Hawley added. “When you harness all of these things together, you get a capability, based on the reporting, that is different in kind than anything we have seen in this country.”

No Flock representatives testified at the hearing. Hawley had invited CEO Garret Langley to testify, but Langley instead submitted a written response to the subcommittee.

According to Hawley, Flock acknowledged in the response that it conducts “very little oversight” of client searches and relies on its customers to police their own use of the system.

“The underlying search records are owned and controlled by each customer agency,” the letter stated. 

Hawley further revealed that Flock clients control the data retention and, until last year, Flock customers could enter the reason for a search into a “free text field” without meaningful accountability. Hawley pointed to examples in which search reasons were entered simply as “search” or lol.”

Hawley has been highly critical of Flock Safety, announcing last month that he would investigate the company and the data it collects with its AI-powered surveillance cameras. Hawley issued a letter to Langley at the time demanding answers about what safeguards were in place to protect the data collected.

“In a few short years, Flock has assembled an unprecedented national surveillance network,” Hawley noted in the letter. “Your company boasts more than 120,000 cameras across 49 states and more than 20 billion vehicle scans every month. The overwhelming majority of the Americans captured in those records did nothing wrong."