Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Brussels vs. Warsaw: The Battle for Poland’s Last Line of Defense


Brussels vs. Warsaw: The Battle for Poland’s Last Line of Defense
Paul Dragu


The globalists are making a play to destroy Polish sovereignty, with Prime Minister Donald Tusk and his pro-European Union political allies at the center of a crisis that erupted Friday.

The ongoing drama began with a “forcible takeover of the seat of the Constitutional Court by the police,” as Warsaw-based legal think tank Ordo Iuris Institute for Legal Culture described it. The move prompted an emergency in-air U-turn by President Karol Nawrocki, who was on his way to a diplomatic visit in Africa. Nawrocki confirmed his turnaround in an X post, saying, “At such a moment, the President must be in Poland. I’m interrupting my flight to Senegal. I’m returning.”

Nawrocki and Tusk are on opposite sides of the political divide.

Nawrocki’s chief of staff, Paweł Szefernaker, issued a statement encapsulating the serious nature of the situation:

Tonight, there has been a breach of the constitutional order of the Republic of Poland and a forcible takeover of a constitutional organ of the state. I call for the restoration of the legal order and for the forces of coercion sent there by the government to leave the Tribunal’s grounds.

Dramatic videos showing Nawrocki essentially forcing his way into the Court after his return have appeared on social media.
 

The Constitutional Tribunal determines if laws, either domestic or international ones adopted by Poland, are compatible with the 1997 Polish Constitution. The fight is for control of the highest court in the country, the institution that yields the power to hold the Eurocrats at bay.

Conservative Polish lawmakers allege the ultimate point of the current chicanery is to remove the barriers that keep Poland conservative, sovereign, and immune to European Union pressure for laws that undermine national sovereignty and favor globalism. In a social media video, Dariusz Matecki, a nationalistic Polish politician who serves in the Sejm, the lower house of parliament, laid out his version of what’s going on:

n Poland we have liberal left government. Tusk, his name is Tusk, he’s a prime minister. And what is happening now with Tribunal Court, Constitutional Tribunal: they want to take over, they want to shove it with their own people. Why? Because they want to get rid of Polish currency, they want to get us into the eurozone here, because they are pushed by Germans. Also they want to get rid of our secure borders, because Germans want to spread illegals and they want to send them to Poland.

So that’s what they want to do. First of all, Polish currency, zloty, by the Constitution is our currency. They have to change the Constitution. Without Tribunal Court, without Constitutional Court, they cannot do it. So number one, they want to get rid of Polish currency. They want us to get euro and get into the eurozone, and then take our gold, the biggest reserve in European Union, to Frankfurt, to European Central Bank, German bank. They want to open the borders, and they want to make sure that when they’re gonna lose, because we’ve got elections next year, Tribunal Court, Constitutional Court will do nothing against what is going to happen.

So there’s much more reasons, but I want you to understand: they are under German influence, they are globalists, and we are fighting not only for Poland, we are fighting for Europe. Be like Poland means be strong, and our nation is strong. We’re gonna win it.

American commentator Jack Posobiec also subscribes to the mass migration angle. “Poland is one of the only EU countries that refused to take Muslim migrants for the last 10 years and rejected the agenda of the globalists to transform their nation,” he wrote on social media. “The globalists are now using state force to open the doors of Poland to mass Islamificafion like Paris and London.”

The Constitutional Tribunal, as made up now, is no friend of internationalism. A majority of the 15 judges who sit on it were appointed, over time, by Poland’s conservative-nationalist political party Law and Justice, or PiS. Most analysis point to 2015 as the genesis of the current crisis, which includes a series of actions that ultimately led to the Court being dominated by more conservative judges. Poland’s oldest daily newspaper, Rzeczpospolita, regarded as the country’s leading legal paper, explains in detail how the current crisis came to be.

The Tribunal Court has ruled that EU law cannot override the Polish Constitution. In 2021, the Court held that certain interpretations of the EU treaties were incompatible with the Polish Constitution, thereby asserting the supremacy of the Polish Constitution over EU law.



As to the events that unfolded a few days ago, Ordo Iuris laid out the following:

On the night of October 30, police took control of the Constitutional Tribunal’s headquarters in Warsaw. They stopped the Court’s own security guards; the Court’s vice president, Bartłomiej Sochański; and the Court’s director, its top administrator, from entering. One of the newer judges, someone who was appointed when Tusk’s governing coalition had the majority, Anna Korwin-Piotrowska, was already inside. She signed an order suspending the Court’s president, Bogdan Święczkowski, and the vice president.



Ordo Iuris says what Korwin-Piotrowska did was illegal. A new judge needs to take the oath in front of the president of Poland before starting work. Since she hadn’t, in Ordo Iuris’ view, she had no power to give any orders. Moreover, there’s no Polish law that lets anyone suspend the Court’s president this way.

Also, the police had no right to be there. Ordo Iuris points out, “No provision of law authorizes the police or the government directing them to take control of the Tribunal’s headquarters and deprive its organs of access to the building.” In fact, this may very well be a crime. Ordo Iuris says this could count as forcibly removing a constitutional body of the state, which carries up to 20 years in prison. It also says officials may have abused their power.



As Trump ‘Makes Nice’ With Moscow, the CIA Has Other Ideas


As Trump ‘Makes Nice’ With Moscow, the CIA Has Other Ideas
Alastair Crooke


The Atlantic on October 23 published a profile of CIA chief John Ratcliffe. Its subheadline contains the most significant “tell” from the piece—“CIA Director John Ratcliffe leads an agency that’s at war with Russia, even as Trump makes nice with Putin.”

The Atlantic article makes no bones about its ulterior purpose. It is to present Ratcliffe as an even-handed professional who has mastered the intricacies of the Ukraine War and tells it “like it is” to the president, leaving the latter to decide his options.

This panegyric to Ratcliffe, however, hides substantive issues about the probity of CIA intelligence analyses, their impact on policy, and the extent to which the pure excitement of militarized covert action inevitably hobbles intelligence agencies and analytic reporting.

Intelligence is never wholly objective. And its professionalism largely hangs on service culture, which can—and does—change.

As one example, a former head of the IDF’s Military Intelligence research and analysis division, General Itai Brun, warned that Israel’s inability to recognize what Hamas was planning for October 7 resulted, not from a lack of information, but from a failure of culture and approach. Per the Times of Israel’s report of his comments:


Even after the massacre, intelligence didn’t internalize that Hamas believed it could succeed…. The whole military intelligence network “was not listening, because it was convinced it knew…. It could not accept the possibility that it was wrong.

So, when it comes to “culture,” in this sense, two points in the Atlantic piece stand out: First, the article hints that Ratcliffe is seen by his staff to be “clear-eyed about the threat Russia poses not just to Ukraine—but to the United States and its allies.” This suggests that Radcliffe sees Russia as an eternal enemy of the West, or at least a current enemy with nefarious intentions. Secondly, the article emphasises that the CIA is in “the lead” on Ukraine and that its paramilitary wing—Covert Action—is thrilled at being so busy. As Larry Johnson, a former CIA official, outlines:

The CIA helps Ukraine knock out Russian refining capacity. Diesel prices soar. Then… in the middle of peace talks in Miami… President [Trump] announces a deal for Russia to sell its diesel on the world market…. So the United States is simultaneously paying to destroy Russian diesel production and begging Russia to sell it more diesel. You could not design a more incoherent policy if you tried.

The Atlantic piece lends credence to what has long been supposed—that Trump’s attempts to secure a “deal” with Russia (most recently by importing Russian diesel into America to bring the price down for the midterm elections) is a deceit intended to coax Moscow towards making a deal (unfavorable, in the Kremlin optic) with Trump.

It would be a deceit because the CIA pursues its own (militarised) covert action war on Russia. The Atlantic, citing a CIA officer, reports:

Armed with information that the U.S. provides, Ukraine’s military has launched strikes deep inside Russia. And U.S. spy satellites provide early warning about incoming missiles and drones. Among U.S. personnel on the ground, “the CIA is in the lead,” a retired senior officer who travels frequently to Ukraine told me.


More...


Food wars heating up: Six more European countries report grocery store cooling systems hacked, food destroyed


Food wars heating up: Six more European countries report grocery store cooling systems hacked, food destroyed


The food wars continue to rage as hackers struck a second time in less than a month against grocery store cooling systems in Europe on Monday.

On October 11, an unknown entity hacked into the refrigeration controllers at up to 700 French supermarkets and set them to defrost mode overnight, causing their refrigerators to overheat. The cold chain disruption forced supermarkets to discard thousands of pounds of spoiled goods, resulting in losses estimated to total tens of millions of euros.

But on Monday, November 2, the attack was more widespread as cyber attackers made sure six countries felt the pain.

The incidents caused temperature spikes and spoiled food in the refrigeration and freezer sections at stores in Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Estonia, according to a report by NBC News.

Below is an excerpt from the article:

In the incident in France, police said hackers seized control of cooling units at hundreds of supermarkets, raising temperatures as high as 122 degrees Fahrenheit and causing fires and food losses.

Authorities have not indicated who could have been behind the incidents. There were no claims of responsibility.

The issues come as the continent confronts broader security fears stemming from Russia’s war in Ukraine.

The new cyberattack highlights how digital threats can increasingly affect citizens’ everyday lives, the European Commission said Monday.

The Ahold Delhaize supermarket chain in the Netherlands told NBC News on Monday that it was aware of an “IT incident” affecting the refrigeration systems in a number of its stores. “Our teams are working hard to fully assess the situation,” the company said in an email.

Stephan Moelans, the CEO of Belgian refrigeration company Sabcobel, which operates Delhaize’s systems, told the Belga news agency that the incident was a cyberattack, in which the units’ evaporators were switched to defrost mode.

In another incident on October 24, a Quaker Oats facility in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, that was world’s largest cereal milling center, processing over 2 million pounds of oats daily, spontaneously exploded.

BOTTOM LINE: These types of incidents are totally preventable. If you’re a private company in the grocery business, stop using internet-connected computerized cooling systems. It’s just that simple. But they won’t do that because businesses are addicted to the ease of efficiency offered by such technology. Instead they will spend millions of dollars trying to find another stop gap “patch” to plug a cyber hole in the system, while the hackers have already moved on to finding the next hole.

This should also be a lesson for homeowners: refrain from buying “smart” appliances, which are easily tracked and hacked. Sometimes, less is better when it comes to technology. And analogue is ALWAYS safer and more secure than digital.

Christian Westbrook, an independent food industry analyst and author of the Substack outlet Unshadowed, wrote in a post:

The Internet of things (IoT) was always a bad idea—now realize they want embedded devices in our BODIES. This is Schwab’s “the 4th Industrial Revolution changes YOU!”

And Kennedy (RFK Jr.) is pushing this from HHS…

As WEF/(Yuval) Harrari said: they want humanity to be “hackable animals.”


When they said you will “own nothing,” they meant it. You will not own anything that you allow into your home, your car, your personal space, your devices, or even your body, when it is connected to the internet. Even if you possess the title or a bill of sale, it can still be controlled from an outside source if it includes a chip allowing connectivity.

Cyberattacks Are Now Destroying Europe’s Food Supply Without Firing a Shot


Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Korybko: Germany's Attempted Takeover Of Poland By Proxy Is To Prepare Europe For War With Russia


Korybko: Germany's Attempted Takeover Of Poland By Proxy Is To Prepare Europe For War With Russia


Just like Nazi Germany seized Czechoslovakia's gold and its robust military-industrial complex in the run-up to World War II, so too is today's Germany plotting to seize Poland's gold and subordinate European NATO's largest army to Berlin ahead of a possibly upcoming war with Russia by 2030.


Polish conservative firebrand Dominik Tarczyński recently explained liberal Prime Minister Donald Tusk's attempted judicial coup as being driven by him then wanting to seize control of the Central Bank, introduce the euro, and then finally transfer Poland's gold to the European Central Bank (ECB) in Germany. As it turns out, Poland has the world's 10th-largest gold reserves, and its 550 tonnes as of 2026 are more than the ECB's 506.5. The ECB would therefore more than double its reserves in that scenario.

That's a significant motivation for what was assessed here to be Germany's attempted takeover of Poland by proxy through Tusk's armed seizure of the Constitutional Tribunal with all that could follow. It could also at least temporarily rejuvenate the euro amidst the rapid militarization that most of its members, the vast majority of whom use the euro, are engaging in to prepare for war with Russia by 2030. The bloc's de facto German leader is far ahead of everyone with a planned €800 billion program.

Poland commands European NATO's (E-NATO) largest military, and conservative President Karol Nawrocki is opposed to the EU's "Security Action For Europe" (SAFE) loans that would also obligate that most of the equipment be purchased from the bloc's members, not Poland's American and Korean partners. He accordingly proposed the "Polish SAFE 0%" program for 185 billion zloty (~$46 billion), the equivalent of the loan that the EU is extending, which Tusk's government agreed to despite Nawrocki's disapproval.

If the ongoing attempted German takeover of Poland by proxy succeeds, and Poland joins the euro prior to more than doubling the ECB's reserves by transferring all of its gold there, then Germany could much more easily advance its plot of federalizing the EU with itself as the most dominant force therein.

Coupled with the rapid militarization of the EU as a whole, with the largest army in E-NATO then subordinated to Germany, the 1941-like threat that Dmitry Medvedev warned about would materialize.

The seizure of the Poland's gold reserves is central to this scenario, ergo why Tusk is expected to support that through the introduction of the euro if his judicial coup succeeds, and there's an historical precedent for his suspected German patron to pursue this policy that's actually against Russia. Hitler seized Czechoslovakia's gold reserves and its robust military-industrial complex in the immediate run-up to World War II, both of which were considered by historians to be indispensable to his war effort.

Likewise, in the run-up to the EU's possible clash with Russia by 2030, today's Germany is attempting to seize Poland's gold reserves and subordinate the largest army in E-NATO to Berlin in dual moves that would be indispensable in the aforesaid scenario. Unlike back then when Germany led the invasion of the USSR from the front, it might instead task its Polish subordinate with sending Poles to die in Ukraine for perpetuating the NATO-Russian proxy war there or starting another one after the latest conflict ends.

Considering what's at stake, namely the materialization of another 1941-like threat to Russia brought about by the German-dominated European Federation that could follow Berlin's attempted takeover of Poland by proxy through Tusk's judicial coup, Poland's political crisis is of global significance. Its outcome could mean the difference between war and peace, without any exaggeration, since it'll shape the post-war European order for years to come.




Second Wave Of Cyberattacks Paralyze Supermarket Fridges Across EU, Weeks After Gov'ts Urged Food Stockpiling


Second Wave Of Cyberattacks Paralyze Supermarket Fridges Across EU, Weeks After Gov'ts Urged Food Stockpiling
TYLER DURDEN

Cyberattacks disrupted supermarket refrigeration systems across Sweden, Belgium, Luxembourg, Ireland and Estonia on Monday morning, forcing retailers to discard spoiled food and exposing the last mile of the food supply chain to major disruptions. The cyberattacks came just weeks after governments urged households to maintain emergency food supplies.

Reuters reports that supermarket chains Ahold Delhaize and Colruyt reported cyberattacks affecting critical refrigeration systems in Belgium and Luxembourg. Carrefour said 15 Belgian stores were impacted, while Irish wholesaler Musgrave said refrigeration systems at 13 SuperValu locations were affected.

"There has been a cyberattack and all our freezers reached 50 degrees (Celsius)," Engla Ingwall, sales manager at an ICA franchise store in Stockholm, told the outlet. Ingwall said the attack occurred around 0200 local time.

Stephan Moelans, chief executive of Belgian refrigeration company Sabcobel, which operates Delhaize's systems, told the news outlet Belga that attackers switched refrigeration evaporators into defrost mode.

The cyber incidents follow an attack in France last month, when hackers seized control of cooling units at hundreds of supermarkets, causing high food losses. The similarities suggest that the earlier attack was a pilot run for broader chaos.

Let's not forget the cyber incidents came weeks after governments in Europe, the US, and Australia urged folks to stockpile food. Those advisories did not identify a specific imminent threat.

Targeting refrigeration systems at supermarkets can quickly destroy perishable foods and disrupt food availability. The pattern here is that saboteurs have an objective of causing mass chaos, but not through kinetic means; rather, by attacking the food supply chain. This builds on weeks of a communist revolution in France that has spread to surrounding countries.