Tuesday, June 9, 2026

Vance: Iran deal a ‘home run for the American people,’ whether Israel likes it or not


Vance: Iran deal a ‘home run for the American people,’ whether Israel likes it or not


US Vice President JD Vance said Tuesday that the emerging peace deal between Washington and Tehran was a “home run for the American people,” whether or not Israel liked it.

The comments came as US President Donald Trump predicted a deal was two or three days away, and denied Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had defied him by responding to Iran’s renewed missile attacks on Israel on Sunday night.

In an interview with Fox News, Vance acknowledged that the US and Israel “have a lot of shared interests, but we also have some situations where our interests diverge.”

“I think where the president has been very clear here is that while Israel obviously has some objectives that it has, the United States’ main objective in Iran is to ensure that Iran does not have a nuclear weapon,” Vance said.

He claimed that since Trump returned to power, the White House has “created the space” for a nuclear deal that would be superior to the one reached in 2015 by then-US president Barack Obama.

“Over the last year and a half, we’ve created the space necessary where the president believes – and I think that he’s right – that we can get the long-term settlement to Iran’s nuclear deal,” he said.

“Now, Israel may like that, they may not like that,” Vance added. “But fundamentally, we think this is in the best interest of the United States of America.”

Asked if the Iranians are “trying to play” the US negotiators, Vance responded: “Everybody’s always trying to play everybody.”

According to Vance, Trump’s emerging deal was better than Obama’s because the earlier deal — which Trump bolted in 2018 after fierce lobbying by Netanyahu — lacked a “proper inspections regime to ensure the Iranians could never build a nuclear weapon.”

“That is one of the big differences between what happened then and what the president of the United States would get to, assuming we are ultimately able to make a deal,” he said.

“We’re going to take the attitude of: ‘Accomplish the president’s mission, but verify over the long term that the Iranians are keeping their end of the bargain,'” he added. “It’s a tall order, but it’s one that the president has put us in a good position to achieve.”

According to Vance, the Iranians “don’t want this war to continue, it’s not in their best interest, and I think they are coming to the table and putting some things on the table.

“We are of course going to verify it, but if we get this deal it’s going to be a home run win for the American people,” he said.

Trump: We’re in ‘final throes’ of deal

Vance’s comments came after Israel and Iran exchanged fire for the first time in two months on Sunday night and Monday, tossing a wrench in negotiations for a peace deal. Both sides have since announced they would hold their fire.

Iran started the round with a missile barrage on northern Israel Sunday night, after Israel targeted Iran’s Lebanese proxy Hezbollah in Beirut despite agreeing last week not to strike the Lebanese capital.

Trump had publicly called on Israel not to respond to the Iranian attack, and Netanyahu on Monday reportedly called off a major strike in Iran after the US president warned him Israel would be alone in the battle.

Asked, in a reported conversation with the BBC, whether Netanyahu defied him by attacking Iran, Trump said: “No, no. That’s not what happened.”

Iran’s missiles “had already gone,” and Israeli forces “were already on their way,” by the time Trump spoke with Netanyahu late on Sunday, Trump was quoted as saying.

“If I tell him to do something, he does it,” Trump said, according to the BBC. “All I said was we have to use common sense, we’re close to signing a very powerful deal, a very good deal.”

Trump also told reporters upon return from Monday night’s NBA Finals game in New York that “we’re in the final throes of what will be a very, very good deal.” The deal would take “two or three days,” he predicted.


Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov Says the Fate of War in Ukraine Will Be Decided by Soldiers, Not Peace Talks


Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov Says the Fate of War in Ukraine Will Be Decided by Soldiers, Not Peace Talks


We reported here on TGP about how Kiev regime leader Volodymyr Zelensky sent a public letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin, ostensibly to ask for direct peace talks.

But upon closer examination, the letter was a puerile provocation, offending and trying to ridicule Putin, and was destined to try to claim the higher moral ground in terms of peace efforts.

Putin chose to respond not to Zelensky, but to the Russian soldiers: ‘rabotayte, brat’ya!’ (Work, brothers!)

Today (8), Russia’s Foreign Minister also criticized Zelensky’s PR move, labeling it rude.

Lavrov rejected the possibility of direct talks with Kiev, saying ‘guns will do the talking’.

Euronews reported:

“Sergey Lavrov specifically pointed out on Monday that Moscow is unhappy that the letter was ‘circulated around the world’, claiming that ‘polite people do not behave this way’.

Lavrov also claimed that for the Kremlin it ‘indicates that Ukraine has no interest in negotiation’.

[…] Russia’s foreign minister echoed Putin’s earlier statement that ‘it is not negotiations but the actions of those involved’ on the front lines of Russia’s war ‘that are crucial to the outcome’ of [the war].”

Lavrov also demanded the full restoration of rights to Russian speakers in Ukraine as a central condition for a ‘long-term settlement’ of the conflict.

Kyiv Post reported:

“Moscow has regularly accused Kyiv of systematic discrimination against Ukraine’s Russian minority and Russian-speaking Ukrainians.

[…] Lavrov repeated those accusations on Saturday in a video address posted to social media to mark Russian Language Day. 

‘Among our absolute priorities are the protection and support of those for whom Russian is their native language’, Lavrov said. ‘We will continue to firmly oppose any manifestations of language discrimination and Russophobia-wherever they occur’. 

Singling out Ukraine, Lavrov said Russia would ‘certainly achieve’ the restoration of rights to Russian speakers, whom he claimed have been targeted by Ukrainians.”


The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse


The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
Pete Garcia,



Few images in Scripture capture the imagination and warn the soul like the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. Ominous and mysterious, these riders stand as harbingers of divine judgment, poised on the horizon of history awaiting their appointed release upon an unsuspecting world.

To skeptics, they are merely dramatic literary devices, ancient apocalyptic imagery meant to provoke emotion but lacking substance. To Preterists, Amillennialists, and Postmillennialists, they belong entirely to the past, fulfilled in earlier historical events. To many average churchgoers, they represent a topic best avoided, too controversial, unsettling, or complex to study.

But to the watchful believer, the Four Horsemen are neither relics of history nor symbolic abstractions. They remind us that human history is not random or endless. It is moving toward a divinely appointed climax.

Within a Pre-Tribulation framework, these riders cannot appear until after the Church has been caught up to Heaven. Their release follows the removal of the restraining presence of the Church and begins the events of Daniel’s “seventieth week.” In that sense, the thunder of their hooves is not merely symbolic—it is prophetic.

Some believe the Four Horsemen correspond to the horses seen in Zechariah’s visions. However, their purposes and colors differ, making it unlikely that they represent the same events as those described in Revelation 6.

Others attempt to interpret the horsemen as symbolic representations of modern crises—such as Islam, communism, COVID-19, or global capitalism. Yet once the horsemen are removed from the framework of Daniel’s seventieth week, interpretation becomes entirely subjective. Revelation would effectively become a “choose-your-own-adventure” prophecy where meaning shifts with each generation.

While Islam may play a role in end-times events, many of its militant elements could be neutralized during the horrific Gog-Magog conflict described in Ezekiel 38–39. If that battle occurs shortly after the Rapture but before the seventieth week, militant Islam would likely cease to be a major geopolitical force thereafter.

Speculation about modern parallels will always exist. But Scripture must interpret Scripture. The prophetic timeline will unfold in one coherent way that aligns with the rest of the Bible.

Revelation was given to John in signs and symbols (Rev. 1:1), but those symbols are not arbitrary. Their meaning is rooted in Old Testament prophetic imagery which had clearly defined meanings.

The Apostle John was given the Revelation by Jesus Christ on the island of Patmos in 95 AD, which, as the early church father Irenaeus noted, was written toward the end of the reign of Emperor Domitian. Domitian only reigned from 81-96 AD. Moreover, Irenaeus would know because he was the disciple of Polycarp, who was the disciple of John himself, which trumps any later “expert.”

Jesus Himself provided the outline of the book: “Write the things which you have seen, and the things which are, and the things which will take place after this” (Rev. 1:19).

Chapter 1 records John’s vision of the glorified Christ. Chapters 2–3 contain the letters to the Seven Churches, representing the present Church Age. Beginning in chapter 4, the narrative shifts to events that occur after the Church Age. In fact, the Church (Ecclesia) is no longer mentioned in the narrative.

Chapters 4 and 5 reveal the throne room of Heaven. John describes the sea of glass, the twenty-four elders, the redeemed, myriads of angels, and the four living creatures—cherubim who surround the throne of God. These living creatures will later summon the Four Horsemen.

At the center of this heavenly scene lies a sealed scroll containing God’s judgments upon the earth. No one in Heaven or on Earth is found worthy to open it until Jesus Christ—the Lion of the tribe of Judah steps forward.

When Christ opens the scroll, the final seven-year period of human history begins—fulfilling Daniel’s Seventieth Week.

The Seal Judgments are the first of three series of judgments in that period, followed by the Trumpet and Bowl Judgments.

More.....



No Third-Country Meddling in the Strait of Hormuz Allowed — Iranian Supreme Leader’s Adviser


No Third-Country Meddling in the Strait of Hormuz Allowed — Iranian Supreme Leader’s Adviser
Sputnik



Mohsen Rezaei, military adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, has reflected on the status of the Strait of Hormuz and US attempts to interfere in regional affairs in an exclusive interview with Sputnik.
The Strait of Hormuz is the domain of Iran and Oman alone, and neither the United States nor Europe will be permitted to manage the strategic waterway, Mohsen Rezaei, military adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, told Sputnik.

Around 30 vessels currently pass through the Strait of Hormuz each day, and Iran is ready to accommodate higher traffic. 

However, the US is obstructing vessels traveling along the established route.

ISRAEL IRAN WAR - Special Update with Amir Tsarfati


(Video)


In this urgent breaking news update, Amir delivers a compelling analysis of the latest developments in the Middle East, unpacking the escalating tensions, key events, and their far-reaching implications for Israel and the world. With his signature insight, Amir explores the spiritual and prophetic significance of these unfolding events, connecting current headlines to biblical truths, and offering clarity on what it all means for the future!