Thursday, February 20, 2025

Bill Gates and USAID: A Dangerous Alliance


Bill Gates and USAID: A Dangerous Alliance With Deadly Secrets
Sputnik


Bill Gates has urged the Trump administration to reconsider its stance on USAID, calling it "an unbelievable asset" and warning that cuts could risk "millions" of lives. What is the Microsoft mogul-turned billionaire 'philanthropist' really worried about?
USAID and the Gates Foundation have worked together for nearly 25 years on issues near and dear to Mr. Gates’ heart, from infectious diseases and vaccines to family planning, agriculture, and climate change.
Major collaborations include the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI).
Gates has also partnered with USAID on the Global Health Initiative and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).

If these names ring a bill, they should:
GAVI is running an ambitious program to vaccinate 86 million adolescent girls in developing countries against HPV with jabs including Gardasil, made by Merck, which now faces a lawsuit in the US over side effects ranging from sporadic paralysis to cancer.
Gates and USAID have continued supporting GAVI despite evidence from India starting in 2009 that its HPV jabs can cause severe illness or even death.
USAID committed over $2 billion to GAVI from 2001-2017, and $1.16 billion more between 2020-2023.
Leaked docs published by Revolver News in 2022 exposed a USAID scheme using pandemic funds for "reproductive health" (i.e. population control) in Africa.
CEPI, together with Anthony Fauci's National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration, has been linked to controversial health schemes of its own, from a September 2019 workshop on vaccine biomarkers to partnership in Event 201, a pandemic simulation held in October 2019, just weeks before COVID hit.
At the same time, the Gates Foundation has invested heavily in companies engaged in GMO research, from Monsanto and its infamous “terminator seed” projects to synthetic meat startups.
An exhaustive 2024 critique of Gates’ agricultural schemes in Africa by the US Right to Know public health watchdog found that his and USAID’s AGRA initiative, focused on chemical-laced monoculture farming, increased dependency and agrobusiness influence instead of reducing hunger.
In other words, Gates' concerns about USAID’s demise seem more about losing a key ally in efforts to control development, food security, and health in developing nations than “saving lives.”
More...



7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Scott, since we live in a fallen world in which our physical bodies are perishing, what do you recommend we do in order to prevent the spread of viruses among our neighbors? Aren't quarantines biblical?

Scott said...

Quarantines don't work and viruses have been in circulation throughout history...You can take Vit C, exercise, get sun, Vit D, Zinc, adequate sleep, quercetin/NAC etc....Virus will always mutate into a less invasive less toxic form (unless its been engineered as a bioweapon and who knows what 'they' can produce)

Anonymous said...

A litmus test for the mark was the willingness to subject one’s self to an experimental relabeled vaccination. Not the Mark, but a litmus test for the likelihood of compliance.

Scott said...

Note to first comment above: so you are back? Why are you so obsessed with this agenda? You are completely incorrect and with all due respect you have no idea what you are talking about....Would you please stop trying to push your agenda and trying to post that link? I'm not going to post it so you may as well stop...Thanks much

Anonymous said...

The Mark may originate from operation Stargate. Familiar oneself with that program would be wise.

Scott said...

Dude, seriously - let it go. Your obsession with this isn't healthy. Also - what is your medical/pharmacovigilance/epidemiology experience that gives you this "insight"?

Anonymous said...

My mistake. I probably should have referenced Project Stargate. The AI database that is all inclusive from my understanding that includes everything known of an individual inclusive of DNA. Opens up many concerns on how this information may be used in the future.