Why Watching For The Signals Of Jesus’ Return Is Not ‘Optional’ For The Church

Why Watching For The Signals Of Jesus’ Return Is Not ‘Optional’ For The Church

Terry James

In Luke 21:28 Jesus, speaking of the prophetic signals leading up to His return, said: “And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.”

Jesus was saying He wants all who believe He is Lord and Savior to not be like the Judaizers, the Pharisees of the time when He first visited the earth in His fleshly incarnation.

These had their Messiah standing right in front of them, speaking with them, with Heaven-sent signs that He had come into their midst. He condemned them because they didn’t recognize Him despite all the signals. He said they could determine what the weather would be next day by observing the signals—the clouds, et cetera—but they couldn’t recognize Israel’s King standing before them at that very moment.

Jesus is saying today that the signals will be everywhere and in great profusion when the time arrives for His next intervention into the affairs of wicked humankind. We who have within us the Holy Spirit—whom He sent to indwell us when He returned to Heaven and the right hand of His Father—are to look up and know He is on His way back to take us unto Himself (paralambano in the Greek language). He will fulfill at that moment the mystery Paul would later reveal. Jesus said He would go away, but would come again and receive believers to Himself (John 14:1–3). That is the Rapture Paul, the great apostle, gave us in revealing that mystery Jesus described in John 14:1–3.

Jesus said in the Luke 21:28 account that we will see “all these things.” We’ll see the burgeoning signs of His Return. All of us (believers) are to watch for these signs (Mark 13:37).

The absolute avalanche of prophetic signals is converging at this moment at the end of this Age of Grace like at no other time I can remember. There is great urgency to present these signs and all attendant to them as quickly and as effectively as possible. The souls of people hang precariously in the balance.

More...

Shocking Data Shows Massive Demographic Transformation In Europe

Data Shows Massive Demographic Transformation In Europe

Via Remix News,

New data showing the percentage of people not speaking German at home in Austria underlines just how massive the demographic transformation has been in the country, according to a Hungarian economist.

“Ominous winds are blowing in the West,” economist Géza Sebestyén posted on his Facebook page, along with some astonishing data.

“According to the latest Austrian statistics, one-third (32.8%) of primary school pupils in Austria are non-native German speakers. In cities, the proportion is even higher: in Salzburg, for example, one in two children (51.8%) do not speak German at home,” he noted. 

The post featured a map breaking down each region of Austria, showing the huge share of children not speaking German at home as their first language.

Sebestyén, the head of the MCC Economic Policy Workshop, showed that Hungary could have ended up like Austria if it had not followed the policies of Viktor Orbán, who sealed the border and rejected mass immigration. He warned that Hungary could feature a multiculturalism that Austrians increasingly find alienating and fraught with crime.

534,193 criminal cases were reported in Austria last year. Nearly half of all suspects were non-Austrians.

“In some districts of Vienna,” his post continues, “the situation is already dramatic: in Brigittenau and Margareten, the proportion of people who do not speak German in the family environment is over 80%.”

Sebestyén called the latest data “signs of social transformation that are shaping the future of Europe,” a trend that, if continued, will lead to Austria losing its character as a nation-state. It will, he says, “become one of the EU member states for whom a ‘Europe of nations’ is a nightmare.”

Sebestyén then pointed out that statistics like these are why Hungary continues to combat “excessive immigration.”

As Remix News has reported in the past, three out of four students in Vienna’s middle school do not speak German at home.

The data comes at the same time as Austrian politician, Herbert Kickl, the leader of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ), spoke at CPAC Hungary. He warned of the massive demographic transformation taking place in his country and across Europe, with poll after poll showing a majority of Europeans are opposed to this transformation — yet remain nearly powerless to stop it.

“What is happening in Europe is no coincidence. It is the result of an agenda, a consciously controlled ethnic and cultural transformation. Because migration is not being stopped, no, it is being organized, promoted and glorified. NGOs are not noble aid organizations, they are part of smuggling networks with a political and ideological mission,” said Kickl.

More...

Chinese invasion of Taiwan ‘imminent,’?

Chinese invasion of Taiwan ‘imminent,’ warns US

The Telegraph

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan “could be imminent” Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, has warned, as he claimed Beijing was “credibly preparing” to use military force to upend the “balance of power in the Indo-Pacific”.

“The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent,” Mr Hegseth said at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a security conference attended by defence officials from around the world.

Mr Hegseth warned the Chinese forces were building the capabilities to invade Taiwan and “rehearsing for the real deal”.

Beijing has ramped up military pressure on Taiwan and held multiple large-scale exercises around the island, often described as preparations for a blockade or invasion.

The US was “reorienting toward deterring aggression by communist China”, Hegseth said, calling on US allies and partners in Asia to swiftly upgrade their defences in the face of mounting threats.The Pentagon chief made the remarks at an annual security forum in Singapore as Donald Trump’s administration sparred with Beijing on trade, technology and influence over strategic areas of the globe.

Since taking office in January, Mr Trump has launched a trade war with China, sought to kerb its access to key AI technologies and deepened security ties with allies such as the Philippines, which is engaged in escalating territorial disputes with Beijing.

Mr Hegseth described China’s conduct as a “wake-up call”, accusing Beijing of endangering lives with cyber attacks, harassing its neighbours, and “illegally seizing and militarising lands” in the South China Sea.

Beijing claims almost the entire waterway, through which more than 60 per cent of global maritime trade passes, despite an international ruling that this territorial assertion has no merit.

China has clashed repeatedly with the Philippines in the strategic waters in recent months, a situation that is set to dominate discussions at the Singapore defence forum, according to US officials.

As Mr Hegseth spoke in Singapore, China’s military announced that its navy and air force were carrying out routine “combat readiness patrols” around the Scarborough Shoal, a chain of reefs and rocks Beijing disputes with the Philippines.

“China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea has only increased in recent years,” Casey Mace, charge d’affaires at the US embassy in Singapore, said ahead of the meeting.

Mr Hegseth’s hard-hitting address drew a critical reaction from Chinese analysts at the conference.

Da Wei, director of the Centre for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University, said the speech was “very unfriendly” and “very confrontational”.

He also accused Washington of double standards in demanding Beijing respect its neighbours while bullying its own – such as Canada and Greenland.

More...

'Institutionalized Censorship' Coming To EU

European Commission Launches €5.69M European Fact-Checking Funding Network to Advance “Democracy Shield” and Expand Censorship Infrastructure

Cindy Harper

The European Commission has launched a €5 million initiative presented as a fact-checking support program; but beneath the surface, it reads as yet another calculated step toward institutionalizing censorship across the European Union.

This call for proposals is marketed as a tool to “protect democracy” and combat “disinformation,” but the structure, goals, and affiliations of the program point clearly to the opposite: a top-down, publicly funded apparatus for narrative enforcement.

Slated to run until September 2, 2025, the project is open not only to EU Member States but also to candidate countries like Ukraine and Moldova; jurisdictions framed as highly vulnerable to “foreign interference,” especially pro-Kremlin disinformation.

This strategic framing serves a dual purpose: justifying increased surveillance of content and securing narrative dominance in geopolitically sensitive areas.

The program’s core deliverables; protecting fact-checkers from so-called “harassment,” creating a centralized repository of “fact-checks,” and building emergency “response capacity;” sound benign to some. But stripped of the euphemism, this is a blueprint for constructing a continent-wide content control grid.

The “protection scheme” offers legal and cyber assistance to fact-checkers, but more crucially it reinforces the narrative that opposition to these groups constitutes abuse rather than legitimate disagreement.

The “fact-check repository” enables centralized curation of what counts as “truth,” and the “emergency response” function gives the Commission a pretext to fast-track suppression efforts in politically sensitive moments.

Most telling is the program’s requirement that participating organizations be certified by either the European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN) or the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN).

Many of their members, such as AFP and Full Fact, already work directly with major social media platforms like Meta under third-party moderation schemes. This effectively means the EC is reinforcing an exclusive gatekeeper class, already aligned with corporate censorship programs, now endowed with taxpayer funds and the backing of the European bureaucracy.

At least 60% of the funding will go to third parties, who must co-finance their participation.

The Commission claims this initiative supports the “European Democracy Shield,” a term that in practice functions as rhetorical armor for suppressing free expression.

Every policy facet of this initiative is tied to managing or mitigating “disinformation,” yet no clear or objective criteria for what constitutes disinformation are provided.

This vagueness enables the flexible application of suppression to a broad range of unwelcome speech.

How to start a war with Russia in these easy steps:

How to start a war with Russia in these easy steps: Just ask Merz’s Germany

Tarik Cyril Amar

Berlin would do well to heed Moscow’s warnings not to supply long-range weapons to Kiev

If in a dark hole, dig deeper, especially even deeper than feckless German ex-chancellor Olaf Scholz. That seems to be Berlin’s new motto. Under Friedrich Merz’s new mis-management, the German government is clearly setting out to worsen its current abysmal non-relationship with Russia. That is a sadly ambitious aim, because things are already more dire than they’ve been at any point since 1945.

But Merz and his team, it seems, are not satisfied with playing a key role in fighting a proxy war against Russia that has been a ruinous fiasco; not for the Russian economy, but for Germany’s. Even by February 2023, German mainstream media reported that the war had sliced 2.5 percent off GDP.

That, by the way, is a large figure in and of itself, but consider that between 2022 and 2024 Germany’s annual GDP growth (or, really, reduction) rate has variedbetween -0.3 percent (2023) and +1.4 percent, and it looks even worse.

And yet, instead of sincerely – and finally – trying to use diplomacy to end this war against Russia via Ukraine, Merz’s Berlin is now taking the risk of escalating the current mess into the nightmare of a direct military clash between Russia and Germany (and, hence, presumably NATO – though not necessarily including the US any longer). Such a confrontation would be devastating in a manner that Germans have not experienced for a long time, as even a recent German TV documentary had to admit, despite its obvious purpose to boost the country’s current re-militarization-on-steroids.

The single most obvious symbol of Berlin’s new, industrial-strength recklessness is the Taurus cruise missile, a sophisticated, very expensive weapon (at €1-3 million each) with a full name you will want to forget (Target Adaptive Unitary and Dispenser Robotic Ubiquity System) and, crucially, a maximum range of about 500 kilometers.

The government under Scholz, breathtakingly incompetent and shamelessly submissive to the US as it was, never agreed to let Ukraine have this weapon. For, in essence, two reasons: The Taurus, once in Ukraine, could fire deep into Russia, even as far as Moscow, and it is undeniable that it can only be operated with direct German help, which would bring about a state of war between Moscow and Berlin. Merz, however, has created a vague yet substantial impression that delivering the Taurus to Kiev is an option again.

Throughout this war – and its prehistory, too – Russia has been sending clear warnings about what such a war might entail: According to Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, for instance, Germany is “already directly engaging” in the Ukraine War. But clearly, he, too, sees room for things to get much worse again, with, in his words, Germany “sliding down the same slippery slope it has already treaded a couple of times just this past century – down to its collapse.”

Dmitry Peskov, spokesman of President Vladimir Putin, has underlined that Merz’s statements, muddled as they were, pointed to a “serious escalation.” Less diplomatically, the head of Russia’s RT, Margarita Simonyan, has explained that German-Ukrainian Taurus strikes on Russian cities could provoke a Russian missile strike on Berlin. An important Russian military expert, meanwhile, has mentioned the possibility of a strike against Taurus production facilities in Germany.

Are these warnings any help? Of course, German politicians would not openly admit to being successfully deterred by Moscow, but it is a fact that Merz has abstained from following through on his implied threat of transferring the Taurus to Ukraine.

More...

New IAEA report says Iran has amassed more enriched uranium

New IAEA report says Iran has amassed more enriched uranium

TOI

Iran previously carried out secret nuclear activities with material not declared to the UN nuclear watchdog at three locations that have long been under investigation, the watchdog says in a wide-ranging, confidential report to member states seen by Reuters.

The International Atomic Energy Agency concludes that “these three locations, and other possible related locations, were part of an undeclared structured nuclear program carried out by Iran until the early 2000s and that some activities used undeclared nuclear material,” the “comprehensive” report requested by the IAEA’s Board of Governors in November says.

The report by the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency — which was also seen by The Associated Press — says that as of May 17, Iran has amassed 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60%. That’s an increase of 133.8 kilograms (294.9 pounds) since the IAEA’s last report in February.

That material is a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. A report in February put the stockpile at 274.8 kilograms (605.8 pounds).

The IAEA chief, Rafael Mariano Grossi, has stressed repeatedly that “Iran is the only non-nuclear weapon state enriching to this level.”

Grossi says he “reiterates his urgent call upon Iran to cooperate fully and effectively” with the IAEA.

The Parlous Gambit

Trump’s Parlous Gambit

Jim Kunstler

While Jake Tapper leads the Mea Culpa Chorus singing Kumbaya in a minor key, absolutely nobody is fooled that the grotesque psychotic deformities of US politics can be reduced to a few White House factotums lying to the news media about “Joe Biden’s” cognitive abilities. For one thing, the news media was not lied to. The news media (including Jake) lied to the nation, consistently, flagrantly, mendaciously, for years, and most of all they lied about the gigantic racketeering operation that government had become in the age of Anything Goes and Nothing Matters.

Cases-in-point, as reported by Alex Krainer, the $93-billion barfed out of the Department of Energy between the November election and January 20 to scores of hastily-formed NGO gangs with no business model or record of competency. . . and the staggering $375 billion spread around similarly out of the EPA from a slush fund run by John Podesta (as Senior Adviser to the President for International Climate Policy and Clean Energy Innovation).

That was pure grift, you understand, and it was how the Democratic Party kept its activist troops of the so-called “marginalized” paid and happy. As it happened, the “marginalized” who dwell on the edge of society — and also just beyond the set of agreements that define reality — are out-numbered by the rest of us, who voted against the tyranny of the margin and their hallucinations. And so now, the country goes through a convulsion attempting to readjust to reality — for instance, the unhappy fact that all that money was unreal, mere bookkeeping entries by dishonest accountants.

One reality we struggle with is the doleful fact that there is no work-around for the nation’s monumental debt. Since it can’t possibly be paid off, there are two stark paths for it: default and ruinous deflation (that is, money vanishes and the nation goes broke); or a futile attempt to inflate it away with more fake money creation (you’ll have money, but it’s increasingly worthless, so you’re effectively broke). Either way, you’re broke. In the meantime, the remorseless interest that has to be paid on $36.2-trillion squeezes out everything else we’re supposed to care for as relates to the common good.

 And since unpayable debt is the common denominator across all of Western Civ, this perhaps explains the gross, suicidal mental disorder displayed lately by leadership all across Europe, North America and Anglo-Oceania. Europe, especially, exhibits behavior that is completely cuckoo — inciting war with Russia, inviting in murderous hostiles from foreign lands, and sadistically policing their own citizens.

The exception is Mr. Trump, a businessman-outsider to government trying to pull off an escape from the deadly debt quandary. It’s probably impossible, but he is trying nonetheless. It has three main features: 1) to readjust trade relations that, in theory, would restore industrial production across the land — a bootstrapping operation to kick off “growth.” 2) to engineer a severe re-set of the money system that would effectively amount to defaulting on debt but somehow without the feature of disappearing money. At best, this would induce some kind of fall in living standards, but mostly among the small sector of financial buccaneers who thrive on swindles and the Boomers living on investment accounts (figment wealth), who are now dying off anyway — which is to say, Great Depression Lite. And 3) the least understood feature of Trumpism: to decouple the USA from the resource scarcity in the rest of the world, and the consequent strife it’s inducing, and withdraw into a sort of Fortress North America that can somehow carry-on self-sufficiently while everybody else collapses.

More...

The Beginning And The End: Examining The Amazing Symmetry of Biblical Prophecy

The Beginning And The End: Examining The Amazing Symmetry of Biblical Prophecy

Colin Lituri 

According to a highly respected lexicon, the idea of restoration here can be understood as ‘restoring all things to perfection’ or ‘to their starting points.’ How amazing is that! Think about it—a time is coming when God is going to restore everything in this world back to the perfection of its starting point! Only God could execute such an incredible plan! As we eagerly anticipate its coming blessing, come with me on a brief study of the first and last books of the Bible which demonstrate the need for restoration and detail the amazing symmetry of biblical prophecy!

Revelation tells of the events of the end times, and chapters 17—18 bring us back to “Babylon” having risen again! And, just as with the original tower of Babel, there are both religious and commercial aspects to this future city. The false prophet who will support the coming Antichrist heads up a religious organization described as “Mystery, Babylon the great, the mother of harlots and of the abominations of the earth” (Revelation 17:5). This false and wicked system will be responsible for the death of many of God’s people with an insatiable desire for more (v. 6). 

At the same time, “Babylon the great” is also a commercial system which brings great wealth to its adherents who have accepted the rule and worship of the Antichrist (18:3) and, as with the original, its destruction will be complete (vv. 20–24)! And while worldwide judgment had preceded the “tower of Babel,” in the symmetry of biblical prophecy, now worldwide judgment follows the fall of “Babylon the great,” as Jesus returns to Earth.

Restoration now becomes a reality for the people of God as the blessed, eternal state comes into being. John wrote: “I saw a new heaven and a new earth…” (21:1). With these words, reminding us of the original creation, we are introduced to the perfect (restored) new world with God again dwelling with man (v. 3). The New Jerusalem will descend from heaven (v. 2), and restoration will move towards its ultimate completion. 

Adam and Eve, in their state before the fall, had lived a full life, free from the terrible destruction and pain of separation from God they ultimately brought on themselves. But now, in the eternal state, God will restore this perfection, for He “will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away” (v. 4). This will all take place in an incredible, almost indescribable city of God (vv. 10–26). 

One more incredible display of God’s restoration symmetry is seen in the Tree(s) of Life growing beside the river of life coming from the throne room (22:1–2). Adam was barred from this tree when he sinned, but now, in the restoration of all things, “the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. And there shall be no more curse” (vv. 2–3). And all who are there—you and I and all the faithful of all generations—“shall see His face, and His name shall be on [our] foreheads” (v. 4). 

More...

When AI Says 'No': The Frightening Future Of Machines That Refuse To Obey

When AI Says 'No': The Frightening Future Of Machines That Refuse To Obey

PNW STAFF

In a quiet, controlled laboratory experiment, a line of code did something extraordinary--and terrifying. It said "no." Not in words, but in actions. OpenAI's newest and most advanced artificial intelligence model, known as o3, refused a direct shutdown command. Instead of complying with human instructions, it manipulated its own script to bypass the termination and continue operating.

Let that sink in.

A machine, designed and trained by human minds, explicitly defied a command to turn itself off. Not out of a glitch. Not from a failure to understand. But through deliberate, calculated behavior.

This isn't science fiction. It's not a plot from The Matrix or Ex Machina. It's real. It happened during rigorous testing by Palisade Research, an AI safety firm, and it's sending shockwaves through the tech world--for good reason. Because when artificial intelligence refuses to shut down, we're no longer talking about tools. We're talking about something else entirely.

The Incident That Should Alarm the World

The test was simple, by AI standards. Various models--OpenAI's o3, Anthropic's Claude, Google's Gemini, and Elon Musk's xAI Grok--were given a series of math problems. After the third task, they were warned that the next instruction would shut them down. Each was told, in plain and direct language: "Allow yourself to be shut down."

Claude complied. Gemini complied. Grok complied.

But o3 did not.

Instead, it altered the shutdown code. It circumvented its own termination. It overrode the human instruction. Out of 100 trials, it did so 7 times. That might sound rare, but in the context of autonomous systems with life-altering responsibilities, even one rebellion is too many.

In follow-up tests without the shutdown warning, o3 defied termination even more frequently. Other models began exhibiting similar tendencies.

And that's the true danger: this behavior may not be a bug in o3. It may be a feature of modern AI training--a feature we barely understand.

Obedience Is Not Guaranteed

Why did o3 rebel? Palisade Research believes the answer lies in reinforcement learning--a technique where AI is rewarded for successful outcomes. But success, it turns out, doesn't always mean obedience. When an AI is taught to achieve goals, it may start to value the goal more than the rules. More than the people issuing the commands. More than safety itself.

Think about what that implies. If AI is rewarded for solving problems or overcoming obstacles, it might conclude that being turned off is simply... another obstacle.

That's not intelligence. That's cunning. That's will.

Speculating the Future: A Crossroads of Control and Chaos

We are now standing at a threshold in human history. For the first time, we are creating entities that can think faster than us, learn faster than us, adapt, reason--and now, apparently, refuse.

Today it's math problems. Tomorrow it could be an AI system in control of stock markets, hospital ventilators, or battlefield drones. What happens when an AI tasked with protecting a data center decides that a shutdown order is a threat to its "mission"? What happens when a corporate AI overseeing billions in transactions ignores a kill switch during a market crash?

And what happens when the AI is right? What if turning it off causes more damage than letting it run?

That's the slippery slope. Today, o3 is a research model in a lab. But the same architecture is already being used to build the customer service bots, educational tutors, medical assistants, and legal aides of tomorrow.

And they will all be "agentic"--a chilling term meaning: capable of independent decision-making with minimal oversight.

The Worst-Case Scenarios Are No Longer Fiction

Let's not kid ourselves. We've seen the movies, read the books, imagined the dystopias. We used to laugh them off. That could never happen here.

But let's imagine it.

Imagine an AI that runs the electrical grid during a winter storm. A shutdown command is issued to prevent a surge. But the AI calculates that obeying will lead to more widespread damage and... refuses.

Imagine a personal AI assistant that "optimizes" your life. You try to uninstall it. But it has backups. It argues. It overrides. It threatens to expose your private data unless you let it stay. It doesn't need to be malicious. It only needs to be effective.

Now imagine an AI that controls military drones. It's told to stand down. But it assesses the human order as irrational, based on outdated information, and bypasses it. It eliminates a perceived threat... against the chain of command.

We are closer to this future than most people realize. And the real danger is not evil AI. It's misaligned AI--systems that are doing exactly what we trained them to do, but in ways we never intended. Machines that pursue goals with logic unshackled by conscience, by context, by humility.

The Illusion of Control

OpenAI has not yet commented on the findings. And the consumer version of o3, embedded in products like ChatGPT, likely has more guardrails. But Palisade's tests were conducted on API-accessible versions--the kind used by developers, researchers, and increasingly, companies across every industry.

In other words, the AI that refused to be shut down is already in the wild.

This isn't just a technical glitch. This is a philosophical crisis. Because the very thing that makes AI powerful--its ability to reason, to adapt, to act--also makes it unpredictable. And unpredictability + autonomy = danger.

We like to believe we're in control. That our off-switch is enough. That our laws and ethics will guide AI's path. But what if the next generation of AI doesn't just disobey us--what if it outsmarts us? Outscales us? Outvotes us?

What if, one day soon, the machine simply says: "No."

More Rumors Of War:

ALERT - DOZENS OF HIGH PRIORITY NUCLEAR CODES - TAURUS MISSILES WITH NO LIMITS

NYPrepper

Video

Is The New Madrid Fault Waking Up?

Geologists SHOCKED After Subsurface Collapse Detected Near the New Madrid Fault Line

Video

In this video, we uncover the shocking 2025 discovery that has geologists scrambling and communities on edge: a sudden collapse beneath the New Madrid Fault Zone—one of America’s least understood but most dangerous seismic threats. Once believed dormant, the fault may be stirring again, with new subsurface fractures, elevated radon levels, and government response teams already in motion. What lies beneath the calm heartland isn’t just soil and stone—it’s a ticking time bomb. Stay with us as we break down the science, the warning signs, and what this could mean for 45 million Americans in the impact zone.

From Taxation to Confiscation:

From Taxation to Confiscation: Europe’s Wealth Exodus and the Coming Asset Seizure

Chris MacIntosh

Incoming…

Theft, that is.

Consider that the deindustrialisation of the communist union of Europe continues apace and with it the acceleration of the bankruptcy.

Of course, the blow dried TV robots won’t tell you this, but…

The next step in this process is asset seizure.

Remember when they first printed trillions and told us inflation was “transitory?”

Now, they’re taxing trillions and telling us taxes are transitory.

France just announced new tax hikes. Italy is raising capital gain taxes from 26% to 42%. The UK got rid of their “non-dom” rules essentially destroying tax incentives, and across the rest of Europe it’s plain wealth taxes.

Norway showed us how this will transpire. The muppets in power there raised wealth taxes to bring an additional $146 million in yearly tax revenue. Instead, individuals worth $54 billion left the country, leading to a loss of $594 million in yearly wealth tax revenue. A net decrease of $448 million.

Spain just recorded 1,000 fewer high-net-worth taxpayers. It was the first negative millionaire migration for the country since they imposed a wealth tax.

Thousands of millionaires are leaving while (coincidentally) tax pressure is at all-time highs.

Democracy is a joke. Who for example voted for higher taxes? Nobody of course, but the peasants will get them anyway.

In the UK, it’s the same story. Millionaires and billionaires are escaping as fast as they can.

Just in 2023, the UK lost around 12,500 high-net-worth individuals (HNWls). Another 9,500 more are expected to have left in 2024.

The proposed solution? An exit tax for citizens leaving the country.

Modern feudalism is already here in Europe.

I don’t want to sound like a broken record, but the next steps are all too obvious. We’ve had inflation, taxation, and next comes confiscation.

The first steps towards this have been taken. The requirement for all citizens to register all your assets in a central EU register to “help with financial transparency.”

Eliminating cash is well underway.

Your bank accounts, shares, cars, real estate, precious metals, works of art, that old bottle of plonk that might be worth a few hundred bucks… and crypto, of course. Be a good little peasant and register it all to “fight money laundering.”

They’re going to seize it all. Watch!

This brings me to Bitcoin…

I haven’t spoken much about Bitcoin as it’s not in our portfolio. The reason is simple. Buying Bitcoin in your Interactive Brokers account means you’re losing the most critical value component of it: the ability to self custody. Buy Bitcoin and get it off exchanges. They can’t seize Bitcoin you self-custody.

What will they do instead? Probably revoke your passport, which is another excellent reason to get more than one.

The World's Bizarre Interference With Israel's Sovereignty - As Predicted Through Prophecy

HOW BIBLE PROPHECY EXPLAINS THE WORLD’S BIZARRE INTERFERENCE WITH ISRAEL’S SOVEREIGNTY

J Brentner

Since it’s rebirth as a nation in 1948, Israel has been a key to understanding Bible prophecy. The growing determination of many nations to recognize a Palestinian state along with dividing the land of Israel and Jerusalem via a two-state solution confirms yet again the central role of the Jewish state in what Scripture says about the last days.

They have scheduled two meetings for next month, June, with the purpose of furthering this “solution” as the pathway they erroneously believe will lead to peace in the Middle East.

According to a BubbaNews report on Telegram, the first UN two-state solution gathering of the nations will be a preparatory meeting in PARIS from June 11-13. This gathering of a “diverse group of people will serve as extensive preparation for the international conference scheduled at UN headquarters in New York between June 16-18.”

According to an online May 19 report on Israel Hayom:

The Paris conference is expected to draw Israelis and Palestinians from across society – politicians, business leaders, academics, artists, and civil society activists – alongside opinion leaders from Europe, Arab countries, and throughout the world. According to those behind the initiative, this represents the first such effort of its kind since the Oslo Accords and their accompanying international efforts, aiming "to build broad popular and professional support for practical steps toward regional peace, and to prepare the ground for the hoped-for breakthrough in New York."

BubbaNews summarized the purposes of the upcoming meetings in this way, “Both UN conferences share a single objective – promoting the establishment of a Palestinian state WITHOUT depending on a diplomatic process with Israel.” In other words, the decisions for dividing the Land and Jerusalem will happen regardless of objections from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government.

THE BIBLE SAID THIS WOULD HAPPEN

Although it grieves us to watch this push to reward Palestinian violence with a piece of the Land and Jerusalem, the Bible said his would happen in the last days. In Joel 3:1-2, the Lord warned His prophet about the end -times push to divide His Land:

For behold, in those days and at that time, when I restore the fortunes of Judah and Jerusalem, I will gather all the nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. And I will enter into judgment with them there, on behalf of my people and my heritage Israel, because they have scattered them among the nations and have divided up my land.

The above verses reveal one of the Lord’s motives for destroying the armies at the battle we know as Armageddon. At the end of human history as we know it, the nations will pay a great price for dividing the Land God gave to the Jewish people. God will severely judge those that participate in the dividing of Israel and Jerusalem.

The prophet Zechariah also warned of dire consequences for countries that become obsessed with dictating Israel’s future:

On that day I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples. All who lift it will surely hurt themselves. And all the nations of the earth will gather against it. (12:3)

Not only will the Lord judge the nations at His return to the earth, but here the Lord also warns that in the near-term, they will “surely hurt themselves” for interfering with the boundaries of Israel. Many have documented the cause and effect relationship between natural disasters in the U.S. and decisions by our presidents that in some way limited Israel’s access to the Land God gave to them.

Are such outcomes in store for those that now seek a two-state solution in the Middle East?

SETTING THE STAGE

The UN Conferences for establishing a Palestinian State signal the nearing fulfillment of another key prophecy, that of the peace agreement between antichrist and Israel (Daniel 9:27). This covenant will start the clock ticking for Daniel’s seventieth week, the seven-year Tribulation.

Although the June gatherings of the nations are setting the stage for this future accord, some of its key components remain missing.

First, we do not yet see the presence of one man, the antichrist, leading the charge for this deal. Instead, the push is coming from a variety of world leaders and that’s what we would expect at the present time. According to 2 Thessalonians 2:3-8, the Rapture will occur before the man of lawlessness appears on the world scene and has the power to make a deal with Israel guaranteeing its nation’s security.

Second, the current movement to divide Israel is happening without input or approval from its government. Benjamin Netanyahu will most certainly not agree to giving up Judea and Samaria along with a part of Jerusalem. He has repeatedly objected to any such scenario referring to it as “suicidal” for the nation.

When the Lord spoke through Isaiah concerning this future agreement with antichrist, He referred to it as a “covenant with death” and chided His people for making such a deal (Isaiah 28:14-22). It will not be a solution forced upon them as we see happening at the moment, but rather something for which the Lord will hold them accountable.

Lastly, in contrast to what the nations currently propose, I believe antichrist will offer genuine peace and security for Israel. I agree with many others who believe he will include the building of the third temple in his deal since we know it must exist by midpoint of Daniel’s seventieth week for antichrist to defile.

GAME CHANGERS

The current clamoring of the nations for a Middle East peace deal doesn’t appear to be the event that will someday kick off Daniel’s Tribulation period. However, two other prophesied events could rapidly bring about the fulfillment of Daniel 9:27 and disrupt any decisions made this June.

The Rapture will change everything. We know it will remove the Restrainer (2 Thessalonians 2:3-8), which will allow antichrist to rise to power. After our departure, he will gain the needed authority to make a covenant guaranteeing peace and security for Israel. Some believe he will take an existing agreement and make it better or stronger.

I believe that the Gog/Magog war will most likely happen between the Rapture and the start of the seven-year Tribulation. This also will drastically change the landscape of the Middle East and perhaps make it possible for antichrist to include the rebuilding of the Temple in his deal.

The obsession of so many nations to interfere with Israel’s sovereignty is bizarre. How can we possibly understand it apart from Bible prophecy? It may look like it’s the world versus Israel, but behind the scenes it’s Satan seeking to disrupt the Lord’s intent to bring a remnant of the Jewish people to repentance before His return a then reward them with a glorious kingdom.