The overhyped threat of a human bird flu pandemic is a hoax to “reset” our food system argues Alexis Baden-Mayer.
As we’ve mentioned in previous articles if bird flu were to suddenly become transmissible from person to person, we can suspect laboratory research and engineering of a virus as the culprit. Read more HERE and HERE.
The response to bird flu outbreaks has so far been to kill healthy birds en mass.
In the following essay, Baden-Mayer details seven things we should know about bird flu including outbreaks caused by bioweapons research; mass killings of birds is expensive, cruel, wasteful and illogical; and how creating food shortages could result in food rationing, which might be the easiest way for them to get people to adopt digital IDs linked to central bank digital currencies, as has already happened in Iran.
Scamdemic Bird Flu: Vaccines for 33 Billion Chickens? Digital Food Rationing? The End of Animal Agriculture?
If the bird flu were to suddenly be transmissible from person to person, there would be every reason to suspect gain-of-function bioweapons research.
But, all the hype about whether the bird flu will become a human pandemic might just be a distraction.
So far, the government’s response to the bird flu has been to kill millions of chickens – 85.87 million birds killed since 2022.
From an animal welfare perspective, it’s viciously cruel. From a sustainable agriculture perspective, it’s senseless. From a food justice perspective, it means skyrocketing food prices, more hungry people and worse food quality.
The biggest meat companies would love to consolidate their control of the food system by getting rid of the last remaining independent family farmers. The World Economic Forum, the billionaires and the biotech companies would love to replace real farms with fake food.
These same globalists are always looking for new reasons why countries should give up their national sovereignty over public health policy to the World Health Organisation.
They might just want to pick up where their vaccine passport idea left off, and use digital IDs to ration food as Iran has done, and then replace the dollar with a Central Bank Digital Currency that functions as a social credit system.
Seven Things to Know About the Bird Flu
1. If the bird flu is suddenly transmissible from person to person, suspect gain-of-function bioweapons research.
Even as the so-called “public health” establishment gins up human cases (it’s a safe bet that any factory farm worker would be sick and have viruses up their nose after breathing manure all day), they are currently insisting there’s no person to person spread, the public health risk is low and the food from animals that test positive is safe to eat.
But, as Christian Westbrook reported in 2022, former US CDC Director Robert Redfield predicted on national television that bird flu will jump to humans and be highly fatal, triggering a “Great Pandemic” for which covid-19 was a mere warm-up.
I suspect this is only fear-mongering to be used as an excuse to continue with the mass killing of asymptomatic birds and at some point “necessitate” the vaccination of billions of animals.
However, it wouldn’t completely surprise me if the “low public health risk” message coming out of US regulatory agencies right now were to suddenly shift to “it’s an emergency” when they decide the timing’s right.
That would be like the covid rollout, where the World Health Organisation’s January 2020 “no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission” message switched in March 2020 to “find, isolate, test and treat every case and trace every contact” ushering in global lockdowns and a race to vaccinate.
As with false flag attacks, it may very well be part of effective plandemic storytelling to have a period of inexplicable inaction that can later be blamed for the situation metastasising out of control and necessitating drastic action. If that happens, there’s every reason to blame gain-of-function bioweapons research.
I’ve investigated the history of “gain-of-function” bioweapons research on the bird flu, and as I wrote in 2022, in ‘Stop Pandemic Bird Flu’, human-adapted H5N1 (bird flu) has a very curious origin.
The first human H5N1 outbreak occurred in Hong Kong in 1997, the year of what the British call the “Hong Kong handover,” when sovereignty over Hong Kong was transferred from the UK to China.
It was during this “politically sensitive” year that Kennedy Shortridge, an Australian scientist who was the director of the World Health Organisation’s reference laboratory at the University of Hong Kong, confirmed human cases of highly pathogenic bird flu.
Shortridge had been studying how avian influenza viruses might spread to humans since 1975. Before discovering H5N1, Shortridge eerily predicted its emergence. As Frank Ching reported in ‘Bird Flu, SARS and Beyond’:
An example of Shortridge’s penchant for such predictions is his 1995 Lancet article ‘The next pandemic influenza virus?’ Curiously, H5N1 emerged two years later, in 1997, in the same city where Shortridge worked, Hong Kong.
At the time, the natural leap of a flu directly from poultry to humans was thought to be so unlikely that scientists first suspected contamination from Shortridge’s lab was the cause of the highly improbable H5N1 diagnosis.
That contamination could only happen if Shortridge had already been working with H5N1 in the lab, and indeed he was. Time magazine reported: “In an earlier study, conducted with great discretion, his lab had found that residents of rural Hong Kong had antibodies to all the known bird-flu viruses.”
No comments:
Post a Comment