Things To Come: Global Plans Of The WHO

Think WHO Shouldn’t Make Decisions About Your Health? You Must Be a Conspiracy Theorist

By Rob Verkerk, Ph.D.

The source of that threat is the most powerful health authority in our increasingly globalized world; the Swiss-based, unaccountable, international non-profit organization known as the WHO.

The scale and nature of the threat will become apparent in the coming months, during the lead-up to the voting by 196 countries at the next meeting of the World Health Assembly (WHA) in Geneva between May 27 and June 1.

The votes will determine how countries should respond in the event of future pandemics or global health emergencies, circumstances we are told over and over again we should come to expect more often than in the past.

The global plan is being driven by the WHO and its leading funders, the top six, in descending order of contribution, being Germany, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the U.S., the European Commission, the GAVI Alliance, and the United Kingdom (U.K.).

If the WHO declares another pandemic or “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC), something it can do unilaterally based on very limited criteria, the plan if enacted, will involve an international response, and consequent national responses, that run quite differently to our recent experience of the COVID-19 pandemic between March 2020 and May 2023.

It should be noted that a single individual, namely the director-general of the WHO, currently Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has the sole power to declare a PHEIC, and this one individual is unelected by the people, unaccountable and has immunity from prosecution by virtue of “diplomatic immunity.”

If you thought the COVID-19 pandemic response by governments, health authorities, corporations and the media last time around was too heavy-handed, too top-down or too authoritarian, don’t imagine the next one will be more even-handed.

Conversely, if you thought the response wasn’t sufficiently robust, that lockdowns weren’t forceful or long enough, that there wasn’t enough testing, tracking or surveillance, that mask-wearing wasn’t mandated sufficiently, that people were given too much leeway to travel, that previously untrialled, novel genetic vaccines weren’t rolled out quick enough or in sufficient number, or that those who exercised their right of refusal weren’t penalized sufficiently, well … you’re going to be thrilled with what’s in the pipeline.

The next time round, the pandemic response by nations and international authorities will almost certainly be more authoritarian and control will be much more centralized, masterminded from the WHO headquarters in Geneva.

Countries will have a binding responsibility to comply with their masters at the WHO, and rich countries will have to gift lots of their hard-won money and healthcare products to poorer countries.

All in the name of health equity, very much the buzzword of the current negotiations. This is at least the vision of many of the most powerful world leaders — on both the political and corporate stage.

Ostensibly, the goals of the WHO are worthy, “to promote, provide and protect health and wellbeing for all people, everywhere.”

These are the first three Ps that Ghebreyesus spoke of in his opening remarks to the 154th session of the Executive Board of the WHO on Jan. 22. (In case you wondered, the other two Ps are Power and Perform, concepts that can seem scary in the hands of an unaccountable body).

The WHO muscle-building plan can’t happen overnight as it inevitably needs to follow the deceptive and insidious, well-trodden approach of “boiling the frog slowly” (in the hope everyone will get used to the direction of travel and succumb to it).

The manifesto is already scripted in the WHO’s upcoming 14th General Programme of Work (GPW 14) (see Fig. 1) that’s intimately connected to the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals.

The WHO has found a way of putting health right at the center of what it calls the “converging crises” of climate, food, energy and geopolitics.

If that wasn’t enough, the health of humans is now expected to be better managed by linking it directly to that of domestic and wild animals, plants and the wider environment through One Health.

We also recognize that elevated surveillance and so-called “vaccine passports” may well be forced through in the name of “global health security.” Mention any of this to anyone who’s sold on the plan, and you’ll be told you’re a conspiracy theorist. Just saying.

More...