Friday, May 1, 2026

Strait of Hormuz blockade achieves the goals of WEF and Agenda 2030 – coincidence?


Strait of Hormuz blockade achieves the goals of WEF and Agenda 2030 – coincidence?



On 13 April 2026, the United States imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz following the collapse of peace talks in Islamabad, Pakistan.

The true intentions behind the US’ blockade in the Strait of Hormuz are unclear, Charlie Howden writes. He speculates whether it may be part of a larger plan to create a new world order, aligned with the World Economic Forum’s goals and the UN’s Agenda 21/2030.


In an article published on Wednesday by Free Speech Backlash, Charlie Howden tries to make sense of what’s really going on with the war on Iran.

The US has blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, aiming to destroy Iran’s economy, but this move risks damaging the global economy, including the US’s own, he reasoned. 

The blockade has reduced traffic in the Strait to 10 ships a day, down from the normal 120-140 vessels, causing a huge impact on the world economy, with oil prices skyrocketing and food security teetering on the brink.

“So, let’s probe the ‘logic’ behind the US blockade,” he said. And continued:


Ostensibly, [the blockade is] to kneecap Iran’s economy, starving its war chest by choking exports. Sounds ruthless, right? Except … is it? Here’s where it gets ludicrous. Slamming Hormuz doesn’t just hurt Tehran; it hammers everyone from British pump prices to Chinese factories. The world’s economy is the real casualty, with International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) forecasts slashing 2026. Why torch the village to smoke out one house?”

If the goal was pure economic warfare on Iran, precision sanctions or targeted interdictions would do the trick without igniting a global bonfire. Instead, this blunt blockade reeks, at best, of overreach, begging the question: is it really about Iran, or something grander – and more destructive?

Is Trump’s fireworks display, wittingly or unwittingly, fuelling the World Economic Forum’s (“WEF’s”) dystopian dream and the UN’s Agenda 21/2030 blueprint for “sustainable” control? Recall the WEF’s infamous line: “By 2030, you’ll own nothing and be happy” – code for centralised overlords engineering scarcity to herd the masses into digital cages – universal basic income, asset grabs and supranational rule under the guise of climate and equity fixes. Agenda 21, that 1992 UN blueprint evolving into 2030’s sustainable development goals, pushes similar themes: interconnected crises as levers for global governance, from resource rationing to behavioural nudges.

The Hormuz blockade’s shockwaves are a near-perfect match. 

Sky-high energy costs? They erode savings, forcing folks from car ownership to communal transport, aligning with “own nothing” mobility mandates. Commodity crunches in food and fertilisers? They spike prices, hammering small farmers and pushing reliance on corporate or state handouts – echoing Agenda 2030’s food security pacts that centralise supply chains. 

Global growth dips? Cue the calls for “resilient” economies via green transitions, digital IDs and wealth redistribution – WEF wet dreams all. Trump’s “America First” bluster rails against Davos elites, yet his blockade is brewing the very brew they sip: interdependence turned weapon, crises as catalysts for reset. Europe’s energy woes? Priming the pump for supranational grids. US consumers squeezed? Softening resistance to universal controls. It’s ironic poetry – anti-globalist Trump, by fracturing the old order, accelerates the one where sovereignty shrinks and elites orchestrate from afar. Is it a coincidence? Or does chaos always pave the road for the “experts”?


More.....








Iran Threatens To Attack If The Blockade Is Not Lifted – Will Newly-Acquired Chinese Missiles Be Used To Sink A U.S. Aircraft Carrier?


Iran Threatens To Attack If The Blockade Is Not Lifted – Will Newly-Acquired Chinese Missiles Be Used To Sink A U.S. Aircraft Carrier?
Michael Snyder


It appears that China has decided to provide Iran with highly advanced anti-ship missiles that are known as “aircraft-carrier killers”, and that is really bad news for the U.S. Navy. Our vessels do not have any effective defenses against the Chinese-made CM-302. The information that I have to share with you in this article is extremely alarming. During this ceasefire, the Iranians have been feverishly rearming, and it appears that they are getting some new toys to play with. If the Pentagon does not take these threats seriously, we could end up with warships on the bottom of the ocean.

President Trump has repeatedly stated that he is not going to end the naval blockade of Iran until a permanent deal to end the war is reached.

But a permanent deal to end the war is not going to be reached any time soon, because Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei is pledging to relentlessly protect Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities…

In his message, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei further said that Iran will closely guard its nuclear and missile capabilities, an apparent response to the US’s desire to dismantle them, Al Jazeera reports.

Iranians view the country’s nuclear and missile capabilities “as their national capital and will guard them like water, land and air borders”, Khamenei said.


It is clear that Trump is not going to get what he wants from Khamenei.

So the blockade will continue, and the Iranian economy will deeply suffer.

Unfortunately, it appears that Iranian leaders are losing patience and may order an attack in an effort to break the blockade.

An Iranian media source is reporting that if the blockade is not lifted soon we will see “practical and unprecedented action”

The continued American maritime piracy and banditry in the form of so-called “naval blockade” will soon be met with “practical and unprecedented action,” a high-ranking security source told Press TV on Wednesday.

Iran’s armed forces – operating under the Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters as the war command – believe that patience has limits and that a punishing response is necessary if Washington maintains its illegal naval blockade around the Strait of Hormuz, the source said.

He further emphasized that Iran has proven in recent imposed wars that the United States no longer faces a passive or predictable adversary.


That is quite a threat.

In the statement that he just issued, Khamenei went even further.

He warned that U.S. vessels could soon find themselves on the bottom of the ocean

Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, who hasn’t been seen or heard from in person since he was elevated to the top job, said that the only place for Americans in the Persian Gulf “is at the bottom of its waters”, according to state TV.

He also claimed that Tehran’s “new management” of the Strait of Hormuz would “bring calm and progress” and economic benefits to all nations.

Khamenei said Iran would eliminate “the enemy’s abuses of the waterway”, adding that his country shared a common fate with other nations in the region, but “foreigners who commit evil” had no future there.


How can Khamenei be so confident?

After all, the Iranians have not been able to sink a single U.S. warship so far.

Well, it looks like the Chinese have decided to offer a helping hand.

According to Reuters, six different sources have confirmed that “Iran is close to a deal with China to purchase anti‑ship cruise missiles”…

Iran is close to a deal with China to purchase anti‑ship cruise missiles, according to six people with knowledge of the negotiations, just as the United States deploys a vast naval force near the Iranian coast ahead of possible strikes on the Islamic Republic.

The deal for the Chinese‑made CM‑302 missiles is near completion, though no delivery date has been agreed, the people said. The supersonic missiles have a range of about 290 kilometres and are designed to evade shipborne defences by flying low and fast. Their deployment would significantly enhance Iran’s strike capabilities and pose a threat to U.S. naval forces in the region, two weapons experts said.


The CM-302 missile is extremely difficult to intercept, and it is known as an “aircraft-carrier killer”

Nonetheless, if the CM-302 were deployed along the Iranian coastline, it could hit almost any target anywhere in the Persian Gulf, in the Strait of Hormuz, and most of the Gulf of Oman.

Not surprisingly, the YJ-12 is defined as an “aircraft-carrier killer” by the PLA.

Although its existence had been known for some years, there was initially very little information about the system or any photos of an operational version—a sign that the PLA wanted to hide its performance parameters and maintain technological surprise.


Will the Iranians use these Chinese-made missiles to try to sink one of the aircraft carriers that the U.S. has deployed to the region?

At the beginning of the war, there was a lot of talk that the USS Abraham Lincoln could be targeted, and so it was kept quite a distance from Iran.

But now these new missiles will allow Iran to strike ships at a much greater distance.

Meanwhile, we are being told that the U.S. is deploying some new missiles to the Middle East as well…

The US CENTCOM has requested that the long-delayed Dark Eagle hypersonic missile be sent to the Middle East for potential use against Iran, marking the first time Washington would deploy the technology, the Bloomberg news outlet reports.

The request by US CENTCOM was made after Iran shifted its missile launchers out of range of the US Army’s Precision Strike Missile, the current technology it has deployed, a person with direct knowledge of the request tells Bloomberg, who adds the request to the military is still pending.

This is yet another indication that the U.S. is gearing up for more fighting.

On Thursday, President Trump was scheduled to receive an important briefing on potential military options…

President Donald Trump on Thursday is set to receive a briefing from U.S. Central Commander Adm. Brad Cooper and other military leaders on potential strikes in Iran, Axios and Reuters reported overnight.


One of the potential military options that Trump will reportedly be considering is a “short and powerful” wave of airstrikes


CENTCOM has prepared a plan for a “short and powerful” wave of strikes intended to break the logjam and force Iran to be more flexible with its demands, Axios reported Wednesday.

Other options being discussed include a special forces operation to secure Iran’s supply of highly enriched uranium or taking actions to gain more U.S. control over the strait, according to Axios.

Of course any new attack by the U.S. will likely provoke a very strong response from the Iranians.

In fact, one Iranian official is pledging that there would be “long and painful strikes” in retaliation…

IRGC Aerospace Commander says Iran will respond with “long and painful strikes” even if the US attack is “short and limited.” US ships will “follow the same fate of US regional bases.”


It appears that Israel is getting ready for more military action too.

Israel’s Defense Minister is warning that his nation “may soon be required to act again to ensure the objectives are achieved”…

“Iran has suffered extremely severe blows over the past year, blows that have set it back years in all areas,” Katz continued at a military ceremony. “US President Trump, in coordination with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is leading the effort to complete the campaign’s objectives in a way that ensures Iran will not return to being a threat to the existence of Israel, to the United States, and to the free world for generations to come,” he added. “We support this effort and provide the necessary backing, but we may soon be required to act again to ensure the objectives are achieved.”


Trump signals no retreat as Iran feels squeeze of US blockade


Trump signals no retreat as Iran feels squeeze of US blockade


The debate in the US is whether to continue relying on economic pressure alone, or to add a focused strike to push Iran into agreeing to at least some of the American terms. In Iran, the economic pressure is mounting: long lines, inflation, and salaries being paid only to Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps personnel.

US President Donald Trump has instructed his staff to provide him with several updates a day on two issues: the readiness and condition of American forces around Iran, with an emphasis on blocking the Gulf, and the economic situation inside Ira.

This indicates that the US assessment is that the deadlock with Iran is expected to shift in the coming days: a wartime ceasefire, but with a naval blockade and tightening sanctions on Iran.

Several military strike options are on the table, including a focused attack on infrastructure facilities, especially those used by the regime, such as power stations in cities that serve as Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps hubs. The possibility of a broader military operation aimed at opening a relatively safe maritime route through the Strait of Hormuz is also being examined.

On the economic front, data coming out of Iran paints a picture of severe civilian hardship. Inflation is soaring, prices of basic goods are rising, and long lines have formed at points of sale for such products. The Iranian rial has deteriorated to nearly 2 million to the dollar. Salary payments to state employees have been stopped, except for Guard Corps personnel. A severe fuel shortage is also causing power outages, while every possible crude oil storage facility is filling up because of the US blockade preventing exports.

According to diplomatic officials, the information is being passed to the US by sources inside Iran. Talks are continuing, but Guard Corps commanders are still refusing to allow the political leadership to make any concession on the nuclear issue.

The debate in the US is whether to continue relying on economic pressure alone, or to add a focused strike in order to push Iran into agreeing to at least some of the American demands. Trump, for his part, is continuing to signal that he has no intention of backing down, or giving up the leverage provided by the blockade.



US ships 6,500 tons of munitions, equipment to Israel in 24 hours


US ships 6,500 tons of munitions, equipment to Israel in 24 hours


The United States recently shipped 6,500 tons of munitions and materiel to Israel within 24 hours, using two large sea vessels and multiple cargo aircraft, the Defense Ministry reported Thursday.

In a large-scale global logistics operation, the two cargo ships docked at the ports of Ashdod and Haifa, carrying thousands of air and ground munitions, military trucks, Joint Light Tactical Vehicles (JLTVs), and additional military equipment, it said.

The operation was led by the ministry’s Defense Procurement Directorate in coordination with its International Shipping Division, its mission to the US, and the IDF Planning Directorate.

The equipment was loaded onto hundreds of trucks from the ministry’s Logistics and Assets Department and the IDF Technological and Logistics Directorate. It was then transferred to IDF bases throughout the country in an operation at the Port of Ashdod overseen by Defense Ministry Director-General Maj.-Gen. (res.) Amir Baram

The air and sea bridge remains the “central tool for building readiness as the security situation continues to develop,” the Defense Ministry said. “Since the launch of Operation Roaring Lion, Israel has received more than 115,600 tons of military equipment in 403 airlifts and 10 sealifts.”

Defense Minister Israel Katz said Israel “stands ready at every moment to act against its enemies, on every front, and wherever necessary. This expanding air and sea bridge directly strengthens the IDF’s capabilities and operational superiority.”

Courageous Waiting


Courageous Waiting


Waiting isn’t easy. We all know this from personal experience: think special vacation or
anniversary getaway or school holiday or wedding day. Those events seem to take forever to
arrive. And while waiting for something pleasant may not be easy, at least it’s positive.
Suffering makes waiting even more intolerable.

David wrote Psalm 27 while experiencing extreme duress. In this Psalm, he refers to adversaries
and enemies who were breathing out violence against him. He was on the run, most likely from
his own son, Absalom. The enemy army he mentions in verse 3 probably wasn’t metaphorical.
The precarious nature of David’s situation makes the climax of this Psalm of lament truly
astonishing.


I believe that I shall look upon the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living! Wait for the
Lord; be strong, and let your heart take courage; wait for the Lord!
” (Psalm 27:13-14)
Our modern English word “to wait” goes back to the 13th century. Originally, it meant “to
watch over” – or even simply “to be awake”. This accurately reflects our current thinking about
waiting. We tend to see waiting as a pause in activity. As in “I’m going to wait out this economic
downturn.” Or “you’ve been added to the waiting list.” But in Psalm 27, David presents a
dramatically different perspective on waiting. I call it “courageous waiting”. Let’s consider
David’s mindset in these two verses.


At the end of this Psalm, David affirms one particular aspect of God’s character: his goodness.
Why goodness? Why not his power or his faithfulness? Probably because we naturally tend to
question God’s goodness when facing difficulties. David confidently proclaims “I accept as true
that God is good
”. But David gets more specific: “in the land of the living.”

The odds were stacked against David, but he remained fixated on God’s goodness. By God’s
grace, David believed that he would survive and would live to see God’s hand of blessing again.
Which brings us to another aspect of courageous waiting…

By the end of the Psalm, David’s circumstances hadn’t changed. But in vs.14, he reminds
himself to keep waiting on the Lord. For human beings trapped in time, difficult circumstances
seem to drag on forever. And, like the characters we read about in Scripture, we don’t know
the end of the story. We need this reminder to “wait for the Lord.” God is at work, even when I can’t see it. God is at work, even when I don’t understand his plan. Because unlike me, God does know the end of the story.


But David was not calling for a passive resignation to God’s will. This Hebrew word breathes
expectancy and eager hope. What might seem like a command to sit back and do nothing is
actually a call to action. This isn’t passive waiting; it’s active anticipating. Knowing that God is
working out his good plan in ways that I may not fully understand, I choose to wait on his
timing. This is courageous waiting. Finally, we see that…

Courageous waiting means actively trusting God. 

David’s enemies are very much on his mind in Psalm 27. In vs.2, he speaks of evildoers,
adversaries, and foes; in vs.3, he describes an encamped army and war arising; in vs.6, he sees
my enemies all around me”; in vs.11, he responds “because of my enemies”; and in vs.12, he
identifies adversaries and false witnesses as they “breathe out violence”. The situation remains
dire, yet David’s faith shines out clearly throughout the Psalm.

Waiting of this kind looks past circumstances to see God himself. We see that reflected in the
remainder of vs.14: “be strong and let your heart take courage.” Here we find one imperative
after another as David calls on his audience to pursue courageous waiting. Courageous waiting
means clinging to the Lord with hope. It means fighting against the despair that threatens to
engulf you. It means choosing to be strong in the Lord even when enemies are arrayed against
you.

And this kind of active faith didn’t just materialize out of nowhere. Backtracking to earlier parts of the Psalm, we soon discover the source of David’s courage. “Yet I will be confident” (vs.3).
Why? Vs.4: “One thing have I asked of the Lord, that will I seek after: that I may dwell in the
house of the Lord all the days of my life, to gaze upon the beauty of the Lord and to inquire in
his temple
.” Throughout his life, David devoted himself to know God, passionately pursuing a
closer walk with him. This made David a “man after God’s own heart”. And deeper knowledge
of God leads to trust. In other words, it leads to the ability to wait…with courage.