Thursday, September 3, 2026

Russia Accused Of Helping Iran Develop Carrier-Killing Supersonic Cruise Missiles


Russia Accused Of Helping Iran Develop Carrier-Killing Supersonic Cruise Missiles
 TYLER DURDEN


Yet another major allegation against Russia has emerged this week in the pages of the London-based Financial Times, which says that Moscow has been helping Iran develop supersonic cruise missiles, in a clandestine program that has been ongoing throughout the war with the US and Israel.

Early in the conflict, it was widely reported that advanced and ultra-fast weapons were used against Israel, which might help explain why the small Mediterranean country suffered so much damage.

The FT cited as part of its journalistic investigation internal Russian evidence it has uncovered including correspondence, travel records and military patents.

The secretive program is being described as "one of the most significant known transfers of strategic military technology from Moscow to Tehran."

At the center of the new reporting is Russia’s state arms exporter Rosoboronexport, overseeing a project codenamed "C430L" - and also involving the US-sanctioned NPO Mashinostroyenia, a rocket design company.

Officials from both entities reportedly started frequently traveling to Iran in 2023, with the program having continued into June 2026 - though it's unclear whether the war with the United States has paused or halted it.

The missile reportedly under development would fly at multiple times the speed of sound, and could be an 'aircraft killer'. It should be noted there are entire Reddit threads focused on questions like: Is there any realistic way for a carrier to destroy a super-sonic “carrier killer” cruise missile?

Jim Lamson, a former CIA military analyst focused on Iran, issued a statement to FT explaining, "For the Iranians, this would give them a qualitatively new strategic weapon system that could threaten US Navy vessels."

Another interesting insight is from Fabian Hinz, a senior analyst with Conflict Armament Research. "This is the transfer of a highly strategically sensitive military technology from Russia that the Iranians have wanted to acquire for decades," he told the FT.

"A program like this would require political clearance from the very top in Russia," he added.

There of course remains the looming question of whether this is all propaganda, designed to put even more Western pressure on so-called 'rogue' actors Moscow and Tehran. It could be, but sharing such technology would also be consistent with recent defense and economic pacts the two sides have inked. This part has been no secret. They are also already deeply involved in drone transfers.

More....


Maine Supreme Court Rules Mom Can't Teach Her Daughter the Bible or Take Her to Church


Maine Supreme Court Rules Mom Can't Teach Her Daughter the Bible or Take Her to Church


The Maine Supreme Court has unanimously upheld a custody order prohibiting a mother from taking her 13-year-old daughter to church or religious events. The court reportedly also ruled that Emily Bickford can't allow her child to learn any "religious philosophy or the Bible in general."

The courts in Maine have granted the girl's father the right to make decisions over his daughter's exposure to religion, so Bickford hasn't been allowed to take her daughter to church for nearly two years. 

The state's high court heard oral arguments last fall in the case of Bickford v. Bradeen — a battle pitting judicial authority against parental rights and the First Amendment. 

Liberty Counsel, a faith-based non-profit legal group, has been representing Bickford and is now asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case. 

"This opinion rejects the First Amendment right of a fit parent to raise her child consistent with her Christian faith," said Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver. "This opinion goes against other state court decisions involving custody in the context of religious free exercise rights and ignores precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court. We will ask the High Court to take this case and overrule the decision."

Since December 2024, Bickford has been challenging a custody order that prohibits her from bringing her daughter, Ava, to Calvary Chapel in Portland, Maine. 

According to Liberty Counsel, Ava's parents were never married, and Bickford maintained primary custody of Ava, while her father had visitation rights. After attending Calvary Chapel for three years, young Ava decided to be baptized. She shared the news with her father. However, the news allegedly upset him, leading to the current court battle.

Bradeen argued the church was a "dangerous and harmful environment" that had caused his daughter to suffer from anxiety. He said she had a panic attack after hearing the church's teachings on the rapture.

Liberty reports that a lower court in Maine concluded that although Bickford is a fit parent and "there has been no showing of harm to (the child) associated with a belief system that is rooted in the Bible," the state court raised concerns about mainstream Christian teachings of Heaven, Hell, eternal salvation, angels, demons, and teaching the Bible "verse by verse, chapter by chapter." 

Liberty Counsel hopes the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the case and evaluate the broader constitutional issues at stake.


Threats to civilian ships and aircraft constitute ‘state terrorism’ – Putin


Threats to civilian ships and aircraft constitute ‘state terrorism’ – Putin
RT


The seizing and targeting of Russian civilian vessels constitute acts of “state terrorism,” President Vladimir Putin has said, warning that these actions are making peace talks with Ukraine more difficult.

Speaking at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok on Thursday, the Russian president denounced the recent captures of Russian civilian vessels and pointed to Kiev’s threats against passenger aircraft.

Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky previously stated that the “safe days” in Russian skies are over, addressing foreign airlines, insurers, and governments whose aircraft continue to use Russian airspace.

“This, of course, is a manifestation of state terrorism,” Putin said, adding that these actions “undoubtedly complicate the possibility of bilateral peace negotiations.”

He also warned that “those who remain silent and do not pay attention to this become accomplices in international terrorism,” referring to Kiev’s Western backers.

Putin’s remarks came a day after the Norwegian authorities seized the Russian research vessel the Professor Molchanov in Svalbard at the request of Ukraine’s state-owned Naftogaz. The ship was detained while docked in the Russian settlement of Barentsburg.

The Professor Molchanov is a Russian state-owned research vessel that operates regular passenger and cargo services between Murmansk and Svalbard, carrying scientists, workers, their families, tourists, and supplies to Russian settlements on the archipelago. Moscow has said the seizure will be challenged in court.

The detention follows a series of Western seizures of Russian-linked vessels accused of belonging to a so-called “shadow fleet,” although the Professor Molchanov itself was seized in connection with a legal claim by Ukraine’s Naftogaz against Russia. Moscow has rejected the “shadow fleet” label as having no basis in international law and accused Western states of using sanctions as a pretext to interfere with civilian maritime trade.

Putin warned last month that attempts to seize Russian ships and sell their cargo amounted to “piracy and robbery,” saying Moscow is prepared to respond in kind in any part of the world.

Kiev has also stepped up attacks on civilian shipping. Putin said earlier this week that around 100 Russian merchant vessels had been damaged over a 40-day period, with sailors killed in the attacks, including Russian and foreign nationals.


Terrorism and desperation: Russian experts respond to Zelensky’s threats to attack civil aviation


Terrorism and desperation: Russian experts respond to Zelensky’s threats to attack civil aviation
RT


On the first day of September, Vladimir Zelensky declared that Russian civil aviation is under threat because of Ukrainian drone attacks.

Russian authorities and diplomats saw clear signs of terrorism in this barely concealed threat and stressed that this is not the first time Ukraine has demonstrated its commitment to the cruelest and most inhumane methods of warfare. Former president and current deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council Dmitry Medvedev called for retribution and even hinted at strikes against the sponsors of this terrorism – the leaders of Western countries.

This article presents comments by leading Russian military and aviation experts, analysts, and publicists reacting to this latest escalation by Kiev.

Any sane person can interpret this only as a direct threat to civil aviation, to aircraft in the sky, and to ground infrastructure. This is simply beyond the pale. Never before has there been a case of the head of one state threatening civilian aircraft in the skies of another.

And here, unfortunately, what depresses me even more is the silence of Western public organizations and human rights groups. I am not even talking about aviation organizations like the International Civil Aviation Organization. Zelensky’s threat is a violation of all international conventions. There should have been an immediate reaction. These are threats to the safety of civilian flights. What more is needed? Yet there is no reaction at all. And in essence, this is silent consent. Or perhaps even approval. It is simply very sad.


The world has been turned upside down. Until recently, we could not even imagine that something like this could be said – and then met with silence.

Still, behind such a statement I see not so much a real threat as a certain act of desperation. I believe that after a week of massive strikes on Ukraine’s infrastructure – its ports, energy facilities, storage depots, warehouses, and everything else – Zelensky is looking for at least some way to stop all of this, but can find no other means than to resort to direct threats and intimidation.

The purpose of this statement is not so much actual strikes and the possibility of carrying them out, as intimidation in the hope that foreign jurisdictions and airlines will be frightened and stop flying to Russia. In other words, the main target was not really Russia, but our partners, in order to provoke fear and a reaction from them.

Because if we look at the practical possibility of carrying out these plans, I do not see it. We have had massive raids, for example against the Moscow region, with more than a thousand drones in a single day. And here it does not matter whether they are flying to strike a particular airport or simply in the direction of Moscow. Our air defense system and our security system work preemptively, cleanly, and in coordination.

As soon as it becomes clear that drones are moving toward a given region – that is, once there is information from air defense systems – the airspace is immediately closed, all aircraft leave that air zone for alternate airfields. Aircraft do not take off, do not climb, airports are shut down. And during all the years of the Special Military Operation, thankfully, there has not been a single dangerous encounter between a civilian aircraft and a drone. Precisely because this system works. And it will continue to work in exactly the same way. Therefore, I do not see any particular danger here for aircraft in the air.

I do not rule out the possibility of deliberately damaging ground infrastructure, specifically strikes on airports. Theoretically, such a thing may be possible to carry out somehow. But hardly in the Moscow area, because it is completely secured – and that accounts for 80% of flights in the country, the lion’s share. Somewhere in the regions they may try to do something like that. But given that foreign airlines mostly fly to Moscow, I also do not see any reason for them to panic and cancel flights or stop operations.

Viktor Litovkin, retired colonel and military commentator

This can only be viewed as an act of state terrorism. When the towers in New York were struck in 2001, only afterward did we learn who had claimed responsibility. But this underdeveloped clown is announcing in advance that he and his clique will carry out terrorist acts against aviation flying over Russia and around the world. This is a serious statement that should, of course, attract the attention of the international community. I think Western countries will simply turn a deaf ear to all this, because they believe Zelensky and his accomplices are unlikely to dare carry out some strike that would harm Western companies.

But for Russian aircraft and other aircraft over Russia, this threat exists, and it can be countered in only one way – by destroying the criminal terrorist regime that exists in Kiev. There is no other way, because with terrorists the conversation is short: they must be exterminated like cockroaches, there can be no other outcome.

Western authorities aren’t interested in international law in this case – anything that is done against Russia, they will support all of it. They should remember that Russia is a nuclear power. This bear is very patient, very calm for the time being, and then suddenly it swings a paw – and half your head is gone. That is how a bear behaves when it is provoked. So if they continue – they may only have themselves to blame later.

More...


Earth Heading for a Cascading Collapse

Earth Heading for a Cascading Collapse – 



In the middle of July, renowned climate engineering researcher Dane Wigington was on USAW to continue warning about extreme weather caused by geoengineering or manmade weather modification in the sky.  He is still predicting the “Summer from Hell” is not over yet, and things are getting worse for life on planet Earth.  Just look at the severe drought in the Western USflash flooding in Nepal, unusually large earthquakes around the world and wildfires that torched more than 3.5 million acres in the Western US that are just now getting contained.  Wigington says, “We have talked about this over the years, and as the walls close in, we are now at a very accelerated part of what should be termed as a cascading collapse, environmentally speaking.  Climate engineering is further fueling all of it, not mitigating it, further fueling it.”

Is planet Earth under attack?  Wigington says, “That is the only thing you can call it.  The intentional intervention in the planet’s life support system can only be considered a form of warfare.”

Most all of the countries on Earth, be friend or foe, are working quietly together

to modify the climate all over the planet.  Wigington says, “Documents from 1978 outline the scope and scale of these programs back that far.  They refer to the intergovernmental cooperation between otherwise adversarial nations because of cross-border ramifications.  You can’t just geoengineer over your own country without affecting the whole world’s weather system.  Now, there is not enough to go around, as we see infighting with power structure cartels around the world. . .. The atmosphere, mathematically speaking, is as thin as the skin on an apple . . . and we are treating it with total contempt.  If that continues, we won’t be here much longer. . .. Climate engineering . . . without question, is the single largest causal factor that is blocking precipitation from the West.  ‘High pressure heat domes,’ we never heard the term 20 or 30 years ago, and that is all we hear now.  That is the signature of ionospheric heater induced. . .. This allows them to steer the Jetstream, keeping some areas cooler and wetter and other areas to bake and burn.”

The human health toll of Geoengineering is not well known by the public.  Wigington says, “What’s wrong with the public?  What is wrong with populations that want to remain apathetically comatose at the wheel while these assaults are coming from every single direction?  We are in a fight for life right here and right now.  It’s not just the water in the Southwest.  The Danube River in Europe is all but dried up. . .. When you have nuclear power plants on the Danube River, as in the case of Romania where nuclear power provides half of the electricity, they are desperate to cool that power plant.  They sank barges to dam up the river to get enough water to cool that nuclear plant.  What happens when they don’t have enough water to cool that plant? . . . What happens when we have Fukushimas all over the world when nuke power plants go into meltdown?”

Wigington also warns about the so-called data centers that will suck up resources like massive amounts of water and power to operate them.

In closing, Wigington says, “What we see are societies are free-falling to imminent impact, and nobody is responding.  When there was legislation passed to ban geoengineering, which is the primary reason it is not raining in the west, Arizona Governor Katy Hobbs vetoes that after it passed both houses in Arizona.  So, it’s not hard to see who is controlling people like this.”

Wigington is still holding out hope that people will start bonfires of awareness to turn the ship around before it’s too late.

There is more in the 47-minute interview.”