Russia’s New Warning Shot

Russia’s New Warning Shot From Space

Martin Armstrong

For years, politicians have been obsessed with tanks, artillery, missiles, and troop counts while the real battlefield has quietly moved into space. The latest reports suggesting that Russian satellites may be capable of disrupting GPS signals on a continental scale should be sending shockwaves through military circles. If these findings prove accurate, then we are looking at a capability that extends far beyond simply making a driver’s navigation system malfunction. GPS is embedded in aviation, shipping, banking, telecommunications, emergency services, power grids, financial transactions, military operations, and virtually every aspect of modern infrastructure.

According to researchers, dozens of GPS interference events detected across Europe since 2019 may have originated from Russia’s EKS satellite constellation. These satellites were originally designed as part of Russia’s missile early-warning system, but testing suggests they may also possess the ability to transmit powerful signals capable of disrupting GPS reception across vast regions. The significance is not whether a disruption lasts a few seconds or a few minutes. The significance is proving the concept works. Once a nation demonstrates it can interfere with navigation systems from orbit, the entire strategic equation changes.

What many fail to appreciate is how dependent modern warfare has become on satellite navigation. Precision-guided weapons rely on GPS. Drones rely on GPS. Aircraft, ships, logistics networks, battlefield communications, and intelligence systems all depend on accurate positioning data. Remove that capability and armies suddenly find themselves operating under conditions that resemble an entirely different century. During the Ukraine conflict, both sides have aggressively pursued electronic warfare, jamming systems, and signal disruption technologies. What appears to be emerging now is the possibility of extending those capabilities far beyond localized battlefields and into continental-scale operations.

Financial markets depend on precise timing synchronization. Cellular networks require timing signals to coordinate traffic. Shipping companies use satellite navigation to move trillions of dollars worth of goods annually. Airlines depend on navigation systems to safely manage thousands of flights every day. Even modern agriculture relies heavily on GPS-guided equipment. The public views GPS as a convenience. Governments and corporations know it has become a critical piece of economic infrastructure.

The next major conflict will not resemble the wars of the twentieth century. Future wars will target infrastructure before populations even realize an attack has occurred. A cyberattack can disable communications. A satellite disruption can interfere with transportation networks. Financial systems can be disrupted electronically. Power grids can be targeted remotely. The battlefield increasingly consists of networks, satellites, data centers, and communications systems rather than simply soldiers crossing borders.

The timing is noteworthy. We are entering the most dangerous phase of the geopolitical cycle. The 2026 Panic Cycle year has already begun exposing vulnerabilities across the global system. Relations between Russia and NATO remain strained. The United States and China are engaged in a rapidly escalating technological competition. Military spending is rising globally. Governments everywhere are preparing for contingencies that most citizens never consider. Space is no longer a peaceful frontier. It has become a strategic domain where the major powers are competing for dominance.

What should concern policymakers is not merely that Russia may possess this capability. The real question is how many nations are developing similar systems. The United States, China, Russia, and other powers have invested heavily in electronic warfare, anti-satellite technology, cyberwarfare, and space-based military assets. Every major power understands that controlling information, communications, and navigation systems may prove more decisive than controlling territory itself.

Invasion of the Killer Data Centers

Invasion of the Killer Data Centers

Donald Jefferies

Wikipedia tells us that a data center is “a facility used to house computer systems and associated components, such as telecommunications and storage systems. Data centers are critical infrastructure for the storage and processing of information, and they support the global financial system….and artificial intelligence.”

Wikipedia tells us that a data center is “a facility used to house computer systems and associated components, such as telecommunications and storage systems. Data centers are critical infrastructure for the storage and processing of information, and they support the global financial system….and artificial intelligence.”

Data centers are being constructed now on a scale never seen before. These big, beautiful data centers have been described as “foundational to how modern society functions.” And, like so many other nefarious things, they are said to be vital to national security. 

In January, 2025, former President Biden signed an executive order on Advancing United States Leadership in Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure, with a decided emphasis on AI’s central role in shaping the economy and our national defense. This order triggered the development of “domestic AI infrastructure,” visibly represented by large-scale data centers. 

We have to “ensure U.S. economic competitiveness,” after all. It’s not like building factories and reviving domestic industry would do that.

Taxpayers are kept in the dark about lucrative data center subsidies, and one source claims we are paying about $1 million for every data center job created. In Israel, Larry Ellison’s Oracle is building a new data center that takes up nine stories. Underground. For “security” reasons. “Experts” warn that “anti-Israel protesters” are among those objecting to all these new data centers.

I worked in Information Systems for nearly thirty years, in three different data centers. So my knowledge of data centers is limited to what they historically were. Companies, or government agencies, would utilize a data center to store the data specific to their company or agency. So these sudden super data centers baffle me.

 One in Utah is said to be envisioned as twice the size of Manhattan. What? How many servers would that require? And what data in Utah is being stored? No particular company built it. No special government agency did. So what is its purpose? What is the purpose of the over 600 data centers springing up in Virginia? Was that much of the state really offline, to require 600 new data centers? Shouldn’t someone be asking these questions? What else could they be used for, other than nefarious AI monitoring? If they’re not for surveillance, explain what they are for. Whose data are they storing, and why is there so much of it? Where was all this data before?

While few of our illustrious leaders are opposing this Orwellian expansion of AI technology, local opposition blocked some 48 new data centers in 2025. Famed whistleblower Erin Brockavitch has been reinvigorated and has introduced a map tracking data centers across the country. Communities are complaining about the cost of the infrastructure, and the usage of crucial resources like water and electricity. 

Environmental activists like Greta Thunberg seem unconcerned with the massive “carbon footprint” these super sized data centers will have. It remains to be seen whether Americans can, for once, mount an effective grassroots movement to stop these data centers, which can serve no traditional IT purpose. It’s not just “conspiracy theorists” who understand that all this new “data” can only be the personal information of American citizens.

Polls seem to show that more than two thirds of people oppose these potentially liberty-threatening data centers. The people rarely show such good sense.

Much as the political support for AI data centers is bipartisan, so is the opposition on the part of the public. The New York Times called it “the most bipartisan issue since beer.”

The Washington Post acknowledged that the people are irate about these “energy guzzling behemoths,” but attempted to rationalize, state controlled media-style, the disconnect between the “representatives” and those who keep irrationally voting for them. Of course, they can’t do that, but nobody reads those newspapers anymore, anyhow. You can’t really have a “populist backlash” without a free press. Which we obviously don’t have.

Two politicians who have pushed back on the data centers are Bernie Sanders and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. Now I don’t trust either one of them, but their opposition here is notable. Global spending on these big, beautiful data centers is predicted to top $7 trillion by 2030. But as usual, the elite have a backup plan. 

Tiny “data centers” which can be installed in individual homes are now being pushed as well. The same questions apply here; just why would any home need a tiny “data center,” and exactly what “data” would be involved? Just as no one delineates what the big, beautiful data centers will be doing, that isn’t being done now, no one bothers to share what an individual homeowner “data center” would do. What else could it do, other than monitor individuals and families? A home security system on steroids. Tracking internet usage. Television viewing. Music listening. Phone conversations. Personal conversations. Energy use. Is that something anyone would want?

These big, beautiful data centers are the culmination of decades of government destroying our civil liberties. Drunk Driving checkpoints (i.e., unconstitutional roadblocks) and SWAT team raids that obliterated the Fourth Amendment. The Patriot Act. Free Speech Zones. Hate Speech, which is Thought Crime. The Supreme Court has ruled that the police are under no obligation to protect the public. They have also ruled that police can use ignorance of the law as a defense. But the public can’t. Think about that- “law enforcement” doesn’t have to know the laws it enforces. As a lifelong Thought Criminal, I was ranting about the MADD-inspired roadblocks, and the militarized police, almost fifty years ago. Very few were listening. We allowed this. We built this, to paraphrase the beloved Barack Obama. It’s nice to see some people out there protesting the data centers, but why didn’t they protest the Patriot Act?

What irks me the most, and should irk all Americans, is how quickly these data centers burst upon the scene. How nothing was explained about their purpose, or why there has been such such a tremendous expansion of “data” since I left the IT world so unceremoniously in 2018. They just are. They’re big and beautiful. We “need” them. True, we didn’t “need” them before, but we really “need” them now. We won’t tell you why we “need” them. Trust us. Would we lie to you? Look at all the “identify theft” commercials. Where are the commercials warning about the truly massive identity theft that will result from these AI data centers? 

 The only “data” they can possibly collect is your personal information. Maybe that’s how they’ll calculate the Social Credit Scores, which will go along with the new Digital Currency. Anyone reading this is sure to have a very, very low Social Credit Score. Congratulations. It’s a big club, and we’re all going to be in it. I’m sure my score will be Hall of Fame worthy.

How could anyone not be suspicious of gigantic AI data centers appearing everywhere? How could anyone not be suspicious of everything at this point? Ask your friends and family what they think all these data centers are for. Just for laughs. Did you hear any protests when all the surveillance cameras started showing up on every street, outside of every business? Why was there no opposition to all the red light cameras to catch the driving infractions that police patrol cars missed? Sure, you have potholes and ancient power grids. But you have SWAT teams. And roadblocks. And free speech zones. And “Hate Speech.” And cancel culture. But no liberty. We are all Winston Smith now. 1984 is here. Big Brother is watching you.

Nashville Data Centers Reveal the Bigger Picture

Nashville Data Centers Reveal the Bigger Picture

Patti Johnson

While investigating who was building the data centers in the Nashville area  for a podcast interview, the pieces fell into place. The main proposal comes from DC Blox for a site at 648 Grassmere Park in the Grassmere Business Park right next to the Nashville Zoo. Their plans start with a roughly 69,000 square foot building and expand to a much larger second one targeting around 50 MW of power capacity. A separate proposal at Fisk University adds another tech and data component. DC Blox based in Atlanta is the developer driving the Grassmere project through local permits. As I looked closer at the money behind it and what these massive AI facilities will power, the bigger picture became impossible to ignore.

The money comes from enormous interconnected global funds that give these projects nearly unlimited backing. DC Blox has already locked in well over $2 billion through green loans expanded to $850 million on top of earlier facilities and other financing including a $240 million deal from Global Infrastructure Partners now part of BlackRock. Equity backers include Future Standard tied to Post Road Group and Bain Capital Credit. This is not local money. It is big global capital flowing into data centers across the Southeast and beyond.

Larry Fink Links BlackRock to the World Economic Forum

Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, sits as Interim Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum’s Board of Trustees.  Remember the World Economic Forum which in a promo video “8 Predictions for the World in 2030” said “You will own nothing and be happy….. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better”.

The WEF pushes hard for the United Nations Agenda 2030 and its Sustainable Development Goals. These plans promote digital transformation, centralized resource management and a shift to new economic systems. The end game openly discussed in these circles is a highly connected global framework where a small group of powerful players, the elite richest people in the world, shape how the world runs.

 When a handful of people and institutions control the money, technology, and the rules, everyday freedom gets squeezed. That is the direction these initiatives point toward digital IDs and programmable currencies as key tools for tracking and controlling access to funds and your very ability to participate in society.

Here is the part that should make every American angry. These data centers are being funded in a roundabout way by ordinary people’s investments and retirement funds. The Big Three asset managers handle trillions of dollars sitting in 401(k)s IRAs pensions and index funds for millions of working families. That money flows into the funds that back the big three, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street and their partners. In essence our own savings are being used to finance the very infrastructure that tightens control over our lives. They are using our money to build a digital prison for us.

More...

Disclosure Day: Are We Being Prepared For An Alien Savior?

Disclosure Day: Are We Being Prepared For An Alien Savior?

PNW STAFF

"Disclosure" has become one of the most powerful narratives of our generation.

This week, the cultural fascination with extraterrestrial life received yet another major boost as Steven Spielberg's highly anticipated film Disclosure Day opened in theaters, introducing millions of moviegoers to questions surrounding alien life, government secrecy, and humanity's place in the universe. Combined with a steady stream of UFO documentaries, streaming series, podcasts, and social media discussions, the topic of non-human intelligence has never been more prominent in the public consciousness.

At the same time, the Department of War released yet another batch of declassified Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) files as part of its Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE). According to the department, its UFO disclosure website has already received a staggering 1.7 billion hits worldwide since launching in May.

Adding to the momentum, a new CBS News/YouGov poll reveals that belief in extraterrestrial life continues to surge. Sixty-three percent of Americans now believe intelligent life exists on other planets, up dramatically from previous decades. Nearly half expect humanity will eventually make contact with extraterrestrial beings, while one in five Americans already believes such contact has occurred.

Whether one believes the government's disclosures represent genuine mysteries, advanced military technology, psychological operations, or something else entirely, one thing is undeniable: society is being conditioned to think about non-human intelligences on an unprecedented scale.

Movies, television shows, congressional hearings, Pentagon videos, whistleblower testimony, social media influencers, and now official government disclosures are all pushing the conversation into the mainstream.

For Christians, this raises an important question.

What if humanity discovers we are not alone?

The answer may surprise many people.

Biblically speaking, Christians have never believed we are alone in the universe.

Long before modern science contemplated extraterrestrial intelligence, Scripture revealed the existence of a vast spiritual realm populated by intelligent beings created by God.

The Bible describes angels, archangels, cherubim, seraphim, living creatures around God's throne, and countless heavenly hosts carrying out divine assignments.

Some angels function as messengers. Others serve as warriors. Some appear to oversee nations. Others worship continually before God's throne.

"Take heed that no man deceive you."

Those words appear again and again throughout Christ's teachings.

The Apostle Paul warned of a coming "strong delusion" that would deceive many. Revelation describes astonishing signs, wonders, and supernatural displays that will convince much of the world to follow the Beast and the False Prophet.

This is where the modern UFO narrative becomes particularly interesting.

What happens if humanity is eventually presented with undeniable evidence of advanced non-human intelligences?

What happens if those beings claim to have created humanity?

What if they deny the biblical account of creation?

What if they present themselves as humanity's saviors?

What if they offer solutions to global conflict, climate concerns, technological challenges, or even death itself?

Would a secular world be more likely to embrace such beings than the God of Scripture?

Many Christians have long wondered whether an extraterrestrial explanation could someday be used to explain away biblical truths or justify a new global spiritual system.

After all, Revelation's False Prophet is described as performing astonishing miracles that persuade the world to follow the Antichrist.

The Bible says he will call fire down from heaven and deceive those who dwell on the earth through supernatural signs.

Imagine those events unfolding in a world already conditioned to expect advanced non-human intelligences.

Imagine a generation raised on decades of alien disclosure suddenly witnessing miraculous displays from a charismatic global leader.

Could people conclude that humanity has finally made contact with superior beings?

Could such manifestations be interpreted as proof of extraterrestrial intervention?

Scripture does not explicitly say this will happen.

But it does repeatedly warn that the final deception will be global in scale and supernatural in nature.

Whatever the exact details, the Bible leaves little doubt that the coming deception will be persuasive enough to fool billions.

That is why Christians should approach today's disclosure movement with both discernment and humility.

We should not fear every unexplained object in the sky.

Nor should we blindly accept every official narrative presented to us.

Instead, we should remember that Scripture already tells us there is more to reality than the physical world we can see.

A spiritual realm exists.

Angels exist.

Demons exist.

God's kingdom is real.

And so is spiritual deception.

As governments release more files, blockbuster films draw millions into conversations about extraterrestrial life, and public fascination with non-human intelligence grows, Christians should remember that our ultimate authority is not Pentagon reports, congressional hearings, Hollywood productions, or viral UFO footage.

It is the Word of God.

The greatest question facing humanity is not whether intelligent life exists beyond Earth.

The Bible settled that long ago.

The real question is whether we will recognize truth when the ultimate deception finally arrives.

Canada's Prime Minister Just Said Europe Will Build The New World Order

Canada's Prime Minister Just Said Europe Will Build The New World Order

PNW STAFF

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's latest comments should make prophecy watchers sit up straight.

During his visit to Ireland ahead of the G7 summit, Carney argued that middle powers should stop competing for favor with America and instead combine their strength. He said Canada and Europe together form one of the world's largest economic, cultural, technological, financial, and military blocs. Then came the stunning line: "The new world order will be built starting with Europe."

That is not the kind of phrase world leaders casually toss around.

Carney's comments reflect a growing belief among many Western leaders that the post-World War II order centered around American leadership is changing. Rather than looking south to Washington, Canada is increasingly looking east across the Atlantic. His government has already deepened cooperation with the European Union on defense, trade, technology, and security initiatives. In Carney's vision, Europe is not simply another partner--it is emerging as the center of a new international framework.

In political terms, this means Canada is attempting to diversify its alliances and reduce dependence on the United States. In practical terms, it represents another step toward a more interconnected and globally managed world.

For Christians who study Bible prophecy, that should sound familiar.

The Bible repeatedly describes the final form of Gentile world power as arising from the territory and legacy of the Roman Empire. Daniel 2 presents the famous image seen by King Nebuchadnezzar, consisting of successive empires represented by different metals. Most prophecy scholars identify those kingdoms as Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome.

Yet the prophecy does not end with ancient Rome.

The final stage is represented by feet and ten toes made partly of iron and partly of clay--a divided kingdom that emerges in the last days before Christ's return. Daniel 7 expands on this vision through the imagery of four beasts. The fourth beast, representing Rome, possesses ten horns. Daniel explains that these ten horns symbolize ten kings who arise from this final kingdom.

Centuries later, Revelation 17 echoes the same prophetic pattern.

"The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast. These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast."

For this reason, many Bible prophecy teachers have long anticipated some form of revived Roman Empire--not necessarily the recreation of ancient Rome itself, but a political and economic confederation emerging from the territory and influence of the former Roman world. This alliance eventually produces a powerful leader commonly identified as the Antichrist, who rises to dominate the coalition.

What makes Carney's comments so interesting is not that they fulfill prophecy. They do not.

But they reveal where influential leaders increasingly see the future heading.

For decades, prophecy teachers were mocked for suggesting Europe would one day become the center of a powerful geopolitical bloc. Europe appeared too fragmented. Its nations spoke different languages, pursued different interests, and often struggled to act as a unified force.

Today, however, European leaders are openly discussing strategic autonomy, independent defense capabilities, centralized economic policies, and a greater role in global governance. Instead of shrinking from world leadership, Europe appears increasingly willing to embrace it.

Yet there is another reason Christians should pay attention to Europe's growing leadership role.

Many European nations have increasingly embraced forms of governance that critics argue are becoming less tolerant of dissent. Across Europe, authorities have investigated, fined, and in some cases arrested citizens over online comments deemed offensive or hateful. Governments defend such measures as necessary to combat extremism and maintain social harmony. Critics warn that the line between combating genuine threats and policing unpopular opinions is becoming increasingly blurred.

The concern is not merely theoretical.

In countries such as the United Kingdom, Germany, and others, authorities have faced criticism for expanding speech regulations into areas previous generations would have considered protected expression. Christians have watched closely as biblical views on sexuality, gender, and family increasingly find themselves in conflict with prevailing cultural norms and government-supported ideologies.

At the same time, Europe continues moving aggressively toward digital identity systems.

The European Union's Digital Identity Wallet initiative aims to provide citizens with a unified digital credential that can be used to access government services, verify identity, store official documents, conduct transactions, and interact online. Supporters view these systems as convenient, efficient, and secure. Critics see the potential foundation for unprecedented levels of centralized oversight and control.

Revelation 13 describes a future system unlike anything humanity has previously experienced--a system capable of controlling commerce and enforcing compliance on a global scale. For generations, skeptics questioned how such a system could ever exist. Today, the technological building blocks necessary for such control are being developed in plain sight.

Globalism often presents itself through noble language.

Peace. Stability. Cooperation. Security. Sustainability.

These are attractive goals in a world struggling with wars, economic uncertainty, migration crises, artificial intelligence disruption, and declining trust in institutions. Yet Bible prophecy warns that the final world system will also promise solutions to humanity's problems. It will appear to offer unity in a fractured world.

But Scripture warns that the unity of the last days ultimately becomes submission.

Daniel 9:27 describes a coming ruler who brokers an agreement that initially appears to bring peace. Revelation 13 describes a charismatic global leader who eventually demands loyalty and worship. Revelation 17 describes kings surrendering their authority to a central figure.

The Bible's warning is not against cooperation among nations. It is against placing ultimate trust in human systems that promise salvation apart from God.

What makes Europe's growing influence particularly noteworthy is not simply its economic or military power. It is the model of governance increasingly emerging alongside it--a model that often places collective security above individual liberty, approved narratives above open debate, and centralized systems above local control.

Whether intentional or not, these developments move society closer to the kind of highly coordinated political and economic structure that Bible prophecy suggests will characterize the final world system.

Mark Carney undoubtedly believes he is helping Canada navigate a changing world. Many of his supporters would argue that deeper European cooperation is both practical and necessary.

But prophecy students see a larger picture.

When world leaders begin speaking openly about a new world order, when Europe assumes a greater leadership role, when nations increasingly align themselves with centralized institutions, and when technology makes unprecedented oversight possible, Christians should pay attention.

Carney may simply be talking about geopolitics.

Yet the direction he describes looks remarkably similar to the world that Bible prophecy has been describing for thousands of years.

The world calls it a new order.

The Bible calls it a warning.