Russia Pledges to Support Tehran

Russia Pledges to Support Tehran

Martin Armstrong

The meeting between Vladimir Putin and Abbas Araghchi is being presented as a diplomatic gesture, yet the substance reveals something far more significant: Moscow has now openly pledged support for Tehran while negotiations with the United States continue to collapse. Russia reaffirmed its strategic backing and even positioned itself as a mediator, while at the same time strengthening its alliance with Iran through military, economic, and nuclear cooperation, making it clear that this relationship is not temporary but structural.

What matters here is not the language of peace but the alignment of power, because when major players begin coordinating at this level during an active conflict, history shows the situation is already moving beyond negotiation. Russia and Iran have been deepening ties for years through sanctions pressure, energy cooperation, and military exchanges, including intelligence sharing and weapons support, and this latest meeting confirms that the alliance is now being formalized in real time as the geopolitical divide widens.

The breakdown in talks with the United States was inevitable, since both sides are demanding outcomes that neither can accept, particularly on nuclear policy and regional control. Iran has made it clear it will not abandon enrichment, while Washington continues to insist on full concessions, leaving no realistic middle ground. At the same time, tensions around the Strait of Hormuz and ongoing military pressure ensure that even temporary ceasefires remain fragile and largely symbolic.

This is precisely the type of environment the war model has been projecting into 2026, where escalation unfolds through a sequence of failed negotiations, tightening alliances, and economic pressure points rather than a single defining event.

Putin is signaling to the world that the lines are being drawn, and once that process begins, it becomes increasingly difficult to reverse. The fact that both nations are already cooperating across multiple fronts, from energy to military coordination, shows that this is part of a broader realignment rather than a reaction to a single conflict.

The critical mistake is assuming that these events can be managed through continued negotiation, because once alliances harden and economic consequences begin to ripple through energy markets and capital flows, the cycle takes on a momentum of its own. This is why the war model has consistently pointed to this period as one of rising volatility, where events accelerate and policymakers lose the ability to control the outcome.

What we are seeing is not the beginning of a crisis but the continuation of a cycle that has already turned, and once that shift is in motion, history shows it rarely resolves quickly or peacefully.

Gold, Silver, and the Coming Currency Wars:

Gold, Silver, and the Coming Currency Wars: A wake-up call for financial sovereignty

Belle Carter

• The BRICS alliance (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) is stockpiling gold, settling trade in local currencies and building a parallel financial system outside Western control. Russia and China have repatriated gold reserves from Western vaults, signaling distrust in the dollar-based system.
• Institutions like COMEX and LBMA suppress gold/silver prices through paper derivatives, naked short selling and synthetic supply. Physical demand exposes the fraud—when investors demand real metal, the system crumbles.
• With $34 trillion in national debt and $155 trillion in unfunded liabilities, hyperinflation or collapse is inevitable. The Federal Reserve’s money printing debases the dollar, while BRICS nations prepare for a gold-backed alternative.
• Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) enable surveillance, restrictions and frozen transactions—tools of financial enslavement. Gold-backed cryptocurrencies and physical metals offer decentralized, confiscation-proof alternatives.
• Survival strategy: Hold physical gold/silver—avoid paper proxies like ETFs, diversify into privacy coins (Monero) and local barter networks and prepare for supply chain disruptions with off-grid energy and agriculture.

In “Gold, Silver, and the Coming Currency Wars,” the author delivers a blistering exposé on the accelerating collapse of the U.S. dollar and the globalist financial system, while making a compelling case for precious metals as the ultimate hedge against economic tyranny.

This book is not just an analysis—it’s a survival guide for navigating the impending monetary reset, where gold and silver will reclaim their historic role as honest money in a world drowning in debt, deception and centralized control.

The BRICS challenge to dollar hegemony

The book opens with a deep dive into the BRICS alliance (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and its aggressive push to dismantle the dollar’s dominance. The author meticulously documents how these nations are stockpiling gold, settling trade in local currencies and constructing a parallel financial system outside Western control. The New Development Bank (NDB) and Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) serve as direct competitors to the IMF and World Bank, offering an alternative for nations tired of U.S. financial imperialism.

One of the most alarming revelations is how Russia and China have been repatriating their gold reserves from Western vaults—a clear signal that they no longer trust the U.S.-led system. The message is unmistakable: the dollar’s days as the world’s reserve currency are numbered.

The weaponization of gold and silver

The book doesn’t just warn of economic shifts—it exposes the outright manipulation of precious metals markets by central banks and financial elites. The author details how institutions like COMEX and the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) suppress gold and silver prices through paper derivatives, synthetic supply and naked short selling.

Historical examples—such as the 2020 silver squeeze and JPMorgan’s spoofing scandals—prove that these markets are rigged to maintain the illusion of dollar stability. Yet, as the author argues, physical demand is exposing this fraud. When investors demand real delivery, the system buckles—revealing the staggering gap between paper promises and tangible metal.

The controlled demolition of the dollar

Perhaps the book’s most urgent warning is the unsustainable U.S. debt spiral. With national debt surpassing $34 trillion (and unfunded liabilities exceeding $155 trillion), the Federal Reserve’s only “solution” is to print more money, debasing the dollar’s value. The author predicts this will culminate in either hyperinflation or a sudden collapse—forcing a desperate “reset” where gold-redeemable Treasuries or a new Bretton Woods-style system may emerge.

But here’s the catch: the BRICS nations are already preparing for this. China’s Shanghai Gold Exchange and Russia’s gold-backed trade deals are laying the groundwork for a commodity-backed financial system that entirely sidelines the dollar

The rise of stablecoins and the trap of digital control

The book also dissects the dangers of stablecoins like Tether, which artificially prop up Treasury demand while enabling government surveillance. The author warns that central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are the globalists’ endgame—a tool for total financial control in which every transaction can be monitored, restricted or frozen.

In contrast, gold-backed cryptocurrencies and physical precious metals offer a decentralized escape hatch—assets that can’t be confiscated or inflated away.

More...

Trump reportedly tells aides to prepare for extended blockade of Iran

Trump reportedly tells aides to prepare for extended blockade of Iran

Reuters

US President Donald Trump has instructed aides to prepare for an extended blockade of Iran, the Wall Street Journal reports, citing US officials.

In recent meetings, Trump opted to continue squeezing Iran’s economy and oil exports by preventing shipping to and from its ports, the report says, adding that he believes that his other options, including resuming bombing or walking away from the conflict, carry more risk than maintaining the blockade.

IRAN COULD START “EXPLODING FROM WITHIN” AS IT’S OIL CAPACITY IS STRETCHED TO THE MAX

IRAN COULD START “EXPLODING FROM WITHIN” AS IT’S OIL CAPACITY IS STRETCHED TO THE MAX

Joe Hoft

Trump said Iran could start “exploding from within” in a few days if its oil gets “clogged.”

It sounds exaggerated, but there’s truth to it.

Iran produces roughly 2 to 3.5 million barrels of oil every day, and that oil has to keep moving through ports, tankers, and export terminals like Kharg Island.

A large share of the government’s budget depends on that flow, so when exports are blocked and there’s NO EXIT ROUTE, the system doesn’t just pause, it starts backing up.

Storage tanks fill quickly, and while Iran does have capacity, somewhere in the range of 40 to 90 million barrels, that space can get used up surprisingly fast under full production.

Once those tanks hit their STORAGE LIMIT, there’s no room left to absorb anything, and that’s where the real pressure begins.

At that point, Iran is forced into a difficult position. They can either cut production and immediately lose massive daily revenue, easily over $100 million, or keep pumping oil into a system that has nowhere to send it.

That tradeoff is brutal: LOSE REVENUE OR DAMAGE INFRASTRUCTURE.

If production continues, PRESSURE BUILDUP starts inside pipelines and wells, and the crude itself begins to create problems.

Oil isn’t uniform, it contains heavier components like waxes and asphaltenes that start separating and sticking when flow slows down. This leads to clogging inside tubing and pipelines, reduced efficiency, and in some cases damage to the reservoir itself, which can make future extraction harder and more expensive.

As pressure builds, the risks expand beyond just clogging:

⚪️ Equipment is put under stress
⚪️ Safety systems get pushed
⚪️ In more extreme cases, you can see ruptures
⚪️ Longer-term infrastructure damage

It’s not about everything literally exploding at once, but the system starts degrading internally in ways that are costly and sometimes irreversible.

When Trump talks about “exploding from within,” he’s compressing all of that into a simple phrase. If you trap oil inside a system that depends on constant flow, you create physical strain that spreads quickly through the entire operation.

At the same time, this isn’t just about engineering, it’s part of a broader strategy.

This approach builds on the idea of MAXIMUM PRESSURE by going beyond financial sanctions and directly targeting Iran’s ability to export oil.

The goal is:

⚪️ Cut off revenue
⚪️ Weaken the state’s ability to fund itself
⚪️ Create internal economic stress that forces a decision

For Iran, this is exactly the situation they want to avoid.

Shutting down wells risks LONG-TERM DAMAGE to fields, while continuing production under blocked conditions risks harming infrastructure.

On top of that, losing oil revenue puts pressure on the budget, the currency, and internal stability.

So the message behind the rhetoric is fairly straightforward. If exports stay blocked, Iran is pushed into choosing between immediate financial loss and potential long-term damage to its most important industry.

That combination of physical and economic pressure is what’s meant to force movement without direct military escalation.

As expected, this means Iran’s storage capacity is full, and they have nowhere left to put their oil. The problem for them is that turning off their rigs is a nightmare as it’s not only a problem getting them to produce again (it could take months and mountains of $$), but even if they do, the damage to the fields means most are likely to never produce again at capacity, if at all. Meanwhile, they’re missing half a billion dollars a day in revenue they can’t afford to lose. Oil exports are their primary source of income.

More....

The Media Would Like To Dismiss It But End Times Beliefs Have Gone Mainstream

The Media Would Like To Dismiss It But End Times Beliefs Have Gone Mainstream

PNW STAFF

The New York times recently ran a column called "The Apocalypse Goes Mainstream" asking why so many adults believe we are living in the "End Times". They tried to be polite in examining the issue but essentially suggested that those who hold to such beliefs have been brainwashed by books such as "The Late Great Planet Earth" by Hal Lindsey for the older generation and The Left Behind Series for the more recent generation. 

About 40 percent of American adults believe that we are living in the "end times," according to polling. The New York Times wants to know where did that idea come from?

Despite beliefs to the contrary explored in the article, belief in the end times did not begin with modern paperbacks or 20th-century theology. It began with Scripture itself--anchored in the words of Jesus, the prophets, and the apostles. What we are witnessing today is not the rise of a fringe idea, but the reawakening of an ancient one.

1. The Words of Jesus Demand Watchfulness, Not Dismissal

In the Gospels, Jesus did not speak vaguely about the future--He gave detailed warnings about the conditions preceding His return: global conflict, deception, moral decay, and widespread fear. He described a world marked by "wars and rumors of wars," lawlessness increasing, and truth growing cold.

These are not abstract ideas--they are observable realities.

To suggest that modern believers are simply projecting meaning onto current events ignores the fact that Jesus explicitly instructed His followers to watch. Not speculate wildly--but remain alert. If millions today see alignment between His warnings and our present moment, that is not irrational--it is obedience.

2. Biblical Prophecy Has a Track Record of Accuracy

Skeptics often treat prophecy as vague or symbolic guesswork. But history tells a different story. The Bible contains hundreds of fulfilled prophecies--many of them precise, specific, and historically verifiable.

From the rise and fall of empires described in the Book of Daniel to the detailed prophecies surrounding the life, death, and resurrection of Christ, Scripture has demonstrated a level of predictive consistency unmatched by any other religious text.

If past prophecies have been fulfilled with such clarity, why should future ones suddenly be dismissed as fantasy?

That's not skepticism--that's selective reasoning.

3. The Modern World Uniquely Mirrors Prophetic Conditions

For most of human history, certain biblical prophecies seemed impossible. A global economy? Instant worldwide communication? The ability to control buying and selling on a massive scale?

Today, those are not just possible--they are actively being built.

Digital currencies, biometric identification, artificial intelligence, and centralized global systems are no longer theoretical. They are here. What once sounded symbolic now reads like a literal blueprint of emerging reality.

This is not about fear--it's about recognition. The infrastructure described in prophecy is no longer distant. It is forming in real time.

4. Israel's Central Role Cannot Be Ignored

One of the most compelling pieces of prophetic evidence is the nation of Israel itself. Scattered for nearly 2,000 years and then reestablished in 1948, Israel stands at the center of global attention--politically, militarily, and spiritually.

Biblical prophecy repeatedly places Israel at the heart of end-times events. The fact that this small nation dominates international headlines, shapes foreign policy debates, and remains the focal point of global tension is not coincidence.

It is consistency--with Scripture.

To argue for a purely "rational" foreign policy detached from Israel's prophetic significance is to ignore the very forces shaping geopolitical reality. Whether one believes in prophecy or not, leaders across the world clearly recognize that Israel is not just another nation.

5. The Moral and Cultural Landscape Matches Prophetic Warnings

The Bible describes a time when truth would be inverted, when good would be called evil and evil good. A time when society would reject foundational truths and embrace confusion as virtue.

Look around.

The erosion of moral clarity, the celebration of what was once universally condemned, and the hostility toward faith--especially Christianity--are not isolated trends. They are defining characteristics of our age.

This isn't about nostalgia or cultural preference. It's about alignment with a prophetic description written thousands of years ago.

Rebutting the Critics

The claim that beliefs about the end times are rooted primarily in modern teachings like premillennial dispensationalism is historically incomplete. While theological frameworks have developed over time--as all fields of study do--the core concepts of Christ's return, judgment, and the culmination of history are deeply embedded in Scripture and early Christian teaching.

Early church fathers wrote extensively about the return of Christ and the final judgment. The expectation of His coming was not a fringe doctrine--it was central to the faith.

As for the idea that prophecy "re-enchants the news in a dangerous way," this argument misunderstands the role of belief. For millions, prophecy does not distort reality--it provides a framework for understanding it. It encourages vigilance, moral responsibility, and hope--not chaos.

The real danger is not that people see meaning in world events.

The real danger is a culture so committed to materialism that it refuses to see meaning at all.

A Call to Confidence, Not Apology

To those who feel dismissed, labeled, or ridiculed for believing in biblical prophecy--this moment should not weaken your faith. It should strengthen it.

Scripture itself warned that in the last days, there would be scoffers. That belief in Christ's return would be mocked. That watchfulness would be ridiculed as ignorance.

And yet, here we are.

Not deceived. Not uninformed. Not clinging to fantasy--but standing on a foundation that has endured for thousands of years.

The question is no longer whether people believe in the end times.

The question is why so many are beginning to see it now.

And perhaps the answer is simpler than critics would like to admit:

Because the signs are no longer subtle.