Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Netanyahu: Potential Iran deal touted by Trump would protect Israel’s ‘vital interests’


Netanyahu: Potential Iran deal touted by Trump would protect Israel’s ‘vital interests’


Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday evening that any deal to end the hostilities between the US, Israel, and Iran would protect Jerusalem’s “vital interests,” in his first comments since US President Donald Trump announced earlier in the day that he was holding talks with Tehran about ending the war.

In an upbeat video statement, Netanyahu said he spoke with “our friend” Trump in a phone call on Monday, and that the two discussed the president’s desire to end the fighting with Iran through a deal.

Trump, Netanyahu said, “believes that there is a chance to leverage the massive achievements of the IDF and the US military in order to achieve the goals of the war through an agreement — an agreement that protects our vital interests.”

At the same time, the premier stressed that Israel was “continuing to strike” in both Iran and Lebanon, where the IDF is in the midst of renewed fighting with Hezbollah, after it waded into the US-Israeli conflict with Iran.

“We are crushing the missile program and the nuclear program, and continuing to strike Hezbollah hard,” Netanyahu said.

“Only days ago, we eliminated two more nuclear scientists, and our arm is still outstretched.”

Trump, earlier on Monday, announced that his administration was engaged in talks with Iran regarding a “complete and total resolution” of the US-Israeli war with the Islamic Republic.

He claimed that the sides were close to an agreement under which there would be a total cessation of the hostilities that have wracked the region since February 28, and which would also include Iranian guarantees to refrain from seeking nuclear weapons and to give up on uranium enrichment.

Iran, for its part, denied that the talks were taking place, with parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf accusing Trump of attempting to “manipulate the financial and oil markets” by claiming the end of the war was in sight.

According to Channel 12 on Monday evening, Netanyahu received regular updates over the preceding 24 hours regarding the ongoing contacts between Washington and Tehran, and, despite Iran’s denial, Israeli officials have assessed that leaders of the Islamic Republic may be amenable to a deal. The outlet said Israel first learned of the potential negotiations on Thursday.

The premier was also reported to have spoken to US Vice President JD Vance on Monday regarding the efforts to renew talks with Iran.

Israel believes Trump is seeking to avoid a broader energy war, the news outlet reported, but officials in Jerusalem do not expect to be blindsided by any agreement.

Israeli officials assess that if a deal is reached, it would be expected to align with Israel’s core war objectives, Channel 12 reported, quoting one source as saying that Trump “remembers who stood with him in battle.”

According to the news outlet, Israel is now working to ensure that the terms of a potential agreement will meet its demands, prioritizing an end to Iran’s nuclear program and strict limits on uranium enrichment. Regime change, the report said, is viewed as a less central goal, though Israel will likely claim to have created the necessary conditions for one.

Another source added that, as in the previous ceasefire deal with Iran, which ended the 12-day war in June 2025, Netanyahu is expected to be involved in shaping any final agreement to end this round of fighting.

At the same time, Israeli sources cautioned that a successful deal from Jerusalem’s perspective would effectively require Iran to surrender, with one source expressing skepticism that an agreement was currently within reach. And even if a deal was reached, the source said, there was doubt that Iran would even honor it.

Channel 12 further noted that any potential deal could also have implications for the northern front, amid the ongoing fighting with Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Israel worried about chance for ‘bad’ deal

To that end, the report said that the Islamic Republic had laid out its demands and requirements for the end of the war during the ongoing mediation efforts.

According to the report, Iranian officials were seeking firm guarantees that the fighting would not begin anew and were demanding compensation for damages sustained during the current round of hostilities.

It said Tehran was also seeking to implement a new agreement that would allow it to control the Strait of Hormuz, the key oil shipping route that it has held in a chokehold since fighting began on February 28.

Trump suggested earlier that perhaps the Strait of Hormuz could be “jointly controlled” by the US and Iran when it finally reopens.

Iran was also said to be demanding the closure of US military bases across the region, after repeatedly targeting the countries that host them with drones and missile attacks over the last few weeks.

However, a separate report from the outlet suggested that Tehran may also be privately signaling some limited flexibility in the talks, and set out what it said were Iran’s opening negotiating positions, as understood by the US, without citing sources.

According to that report, Iran may be willing to halt its ballistic missile program for five years, “reduce” its uranium enrichment, and enter discussions over its stockpile of 60 percent enriched uranium.

Channel 12 added that Iran could also agree to allow International Atomic Energy Agency inspections of remaining centrifuges and to stop funding regional proxy groups, including Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iraqi militias.

Still, Israel was concerned about the chance for a “bad deal” with Iran to take shape, the outlet said, meaning one that fails to address the Islamic Republic’s stockpile of over 400 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium, enough for 11 nuclear bombs.


Monday, March 23, 2026

Hundreds Of Gas Stations Run Dry In Australia As Hormuz Shock Exposes Energy Security Failures


Hundreds Of Gas Stations Run Dry In Australia As Hormuz Shock Exposes Energy Security Failures

 TYLER DURDEN


Australia's weird obsession with "green energy," compounded by a lack of urgency regarding proper energy security, has now collided with the worst energy crisis the world has ever seen.

A country heavily dependent on imported refined petroleum products, many of which transit the Strait of Hormuz, has reached the fourth week of the U.S.-Iran war, but with a full-blown fuel supply shock now underway, and hundreds of gas stations across the country running dry.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen warned federal parliament on Monday that more than 109 gas stations in Victoria had run out of at least one grade of gas. He said 47 outlets in Queensland had no diesel, 32 had no regular unleaded, and 37 stations in New South Wales had completely run out of fuel.

Earlier, NSW Premier Chris Minns warned that 105 gas stations across his state had completely run out of diesel.

The Guardian noted that the energy minister did not disclose how many gas stations in Western Australia, the Northern Territory, South Australia, or Tasmania had run out of fuel.

On Sunday, Bowen said that six tankers from Malaysia, Singapore, and South Korea that had been expected to unload refined petroleum products next month were canceled or deferred. He told local outlet ABC TV that the federal government is urgently working to replace those fuel cargoes.

"The flow of oil to Asian refineries has slowed, and that has downward impacts on us," Bowen said, adding, "We're in an uncertain environment, so that's why we're doing all the preparatory work."

More...


Jerusalem Post Updates:


Live Updates: Sirens sound in Dimona area, Netanayhu and Trump float talks

Kuwait power transmission lines down due to interception debris

ByREUTERS

Kuwait's Electricity Ministry announced that seven power transmission lines had been put out of service on Tuesday due to damage caused by falling debris from interceptions.


Saudia Arabia intercepts Iranian drones

ByARIELLA ROITMAN

Four drones launched from Iran towards Saudi Arabia early Tuesday morning were successfully intercepted and destroyed, according to the Saudi Defense Ministry.


Six of Iraq's Shi'ite Popular Mobilization forces fighters killed in airstrikes in western Anbar

ByREUTERS

Airstrikes targeting a site belonging to Iraq's Shi'ite Popular Mobilization Forces in the western province of Anbar killed six fighters and wounded 15 others, including the PMF's Anbar operations commander, security sources told Reuters early on Tuesday.


Iranian-backed militias fire rockets from Iraq at Syrian base

An Iranian-backed militia targeted Syria with rocket fire. The rockets appear to have been fired from an area north of Mosul in Iraq. The rockets targeted a military base in eastern Syria. The Iranian-backed militias in Iraq have carried out hundreds of attacks in Iraq since February 28, when the US and Israel began attacks on Iran. The militias have been carrying out many similar attacks over the last decade.

According to Syrian State media SANA, “a Syrian Arab Army military base near al-Yarubiyeh in Hasakah countryside was targeted by a missile attack, according to the Army’s Operations Command.” The report said “the command said the attack was carried out using five missiles launched from the vicinity of Tal al-Hawa village, located approximately 20 km inside Iraqi territory.

Go to the full article > >


Iran says it controls Strait of Hormuz, sees no need for mines

An Iranian military spokesman said Monday that Tehran had “full control” over the Persian Gulf, Oman’s territorial waters, and the Strait of Hormuz, and therefore had no need to lay mines in the Gulf, according to Persian-language statements circulated by Iranian media and IRGC-affiliated channels.

The statement, attributed to the spokesman of Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, said Iran was controlling the Strait of Hormuz “smartly and powerfully” and would use “any means” necessary to secure the area if needed. It also said “extra-regional countries” had no right to interfere.




More Than 230 Rescued As Devastating Flooding Continues To Hammer Hawaiian Islands


More Than 230 Rescued As Devastating Flooding Continues To Hammer Hawaiian Islands


It has been the worst flooding Oahu has seen in more than 20 years, and as of the morning of March 21, the torrential rains and rushing waters continue to flow across the mountainous island and the rest of the Hawaiian archipelago.

The devastating milestone was announced on March 20 by Hawaii Gov. Josh Green, who said that damages could exceed $1 billion.

The cause is a type of winter storm called a “Kona Low,” which is southerly or southwesterly winds that bring moist air onto the islands. This is the second such storm that Hawaii has faced this month.


Green issued a statement on the morning of March 21, stating that no loss of life had yet been reported, although there were some serious injuries. But the back-to-back storms caused some areas to get between 40 and 50 inches of rain.

The first storm hit between March 10 and March 16 and delivered multiple feet of rain to parts of Kawai, Oahu, Maui, and Hawaii Island, as well as winds gusting 60–75 mph and even higher than 100 mph in some areas.

This second storm was expected to bring at least another 10 inches of rain to Oahu and more than a foot of rain to Maui between March 20 and 23.


Hawaii Emergency Management warned on March 21 that Maui and Oahu could still face dangerous rainbands capable of producing two to four inches per hour throughout the day, along with wind gusts reaching 45 mph.

“The storm will deliver another four to six inches of rain on Oahu throughout this weekend, but it’s now moving over to Maui, where we expect somewhere between likely four to eight inches, but as much as 10 to 12 in some areas,” the governor said.

He also said that the weather will also move over Molokai and the Big Island.

Flash flood warnings remain in effect for the entire island, which hosts military installations like Pearl Harbor and the state’s capital, Honolulu.

The National Weather Service’s Honolulu office has reported high flood waters closing and collapsing roadways, cutting off entire communities, and lifting homes off their foundations.

Honolulu mayor Rick Blangiardi said on March 20 that dozens, if not hundreds, of homes have been damaged in the storms, but no official damage assessment has been completed yet.

More than 230 people have been rescued, including 72 children and adults who were airlifted by the National Guard and Honolulu Fire Department from a youth camp retreat on Oahu’s west coast.


Ten people have been taken to the hospital to be treated for hypothermia.

More than 5,500 residents along the island’s North Shore were ordered to evacuate as the consistent rains threatened to cause the Wahiawa dam to fail, which would send rushing waters into their communities.

As of the morning of March 21, the dam remained intact, and some water levels had dropped. But Green later reported that water levels behind the dam were up to nearly 82 feet; 85 feet is the dam’s “threshold of great concern.”

Meanwhile, other Hawaiian islands also remain under flood threats through the weekend.

Maui’s Emergency Management Agency issued evacuation warnings for parts of the Ê»Iao Valley in Central Maui and parts of Kihei in South Maui because of a potential flooding threat, and it issued advisories for places in East Moloka’i, East Maui, and Lahaina. The agency clarified that neither warnings nor advisories were mandatory evacuation orders.

The Red Cross also deployed disaster assessment teams to Oahu, Maui, and the Island of Hawaii, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency announced that it was monitoring the situation.

“We are monitoring the severe flooding in Oahu and closely coordinating with [Gov. Josh Green] and [Hawaii Emergency Management Agency] as the state leads rescue and shelter operations,” FEMA said on X.


US Weighs Deployment Of Elite Airborne Troops As Hawks Push Kharg Island Takeover


US Weighs Deployment Of Elite Airborne Troops As Hawks Push Kharg Island Takeover
TYLER DURDEN


A steady flow of headlines continue to point in the direction of escalation in Iran and around the Persian Gulf, even as President Trump has touted backchannel dialogue with Tehran, which Iranian leaders have denied.

The NY Times writes Monday afternoon, "Senior military officials are weighing a possible deployment of a combat brigade from the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division and some elements of the division’s headquarters staff to support U.S. military operations in Iran, defense officials said."

A combat brigade would suggest some 3,000 additional elite soldiers, as the thousands of Marines currently still en route from Japan as well as from San Diego. The first group of Marines is reportedly expected to arrive to the Mideast region Friday, which would coincide with President Trump's announced five day pause on energy infrastructure strikes.

US officials speaking to the Times have made clear that the Airborne planning is just that - a preparatory phase which has not formally been ordered by the Pentagon or CENTCOM.

All of this comes amid speculation that Trump could order some kind of assault and takeover of Kharg Island:


Another possibility being considered, should President Trump authorize U.S. troops to seize the island, is an attack by about 2,500 troops from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, which is on its way to the region.

The airfield on Kharg Island was damaged by the recent U.S. bombing raids so former U.S. commanders said it was more likely to first bring in Marines, whose combat engineers could quickly repair airfields and other airport infrastructure. Once the airfield is repaired, the Air Force could start flowing matériel and supplies, as well as troops, if necessary, by C-130s.

In that scenario, it is possible that the troops from the 82nd Airborne would augment the Marines. The upside of going with paratroopers is they can arrive overnight. The downside is they do not bring any heavy equipment, such as heavily armored vehicles, that would offer protection if Iranian forces counterattacked, current and former officials said.

The whole proposed mission laid out above seems like a longshot, in terms of the potential to go well, and without the US side sustaining a lot of casualties. Army Airborne troops can be rapidly deployed, and would likely support a bigger Marine assault.

Kharg Island is after all hundreds of miles deep into the Persian Gulf and strait, where Iran controls the coastline and can fire on any vessel from there. The Pentagon has said it is softening Iran's defenses along the coast, but what can be accomplished by airpower alone is limited, according to most sources. An airborne or heliborne insertion also carries huge risks.

The 'realist' publication run by the Quincy Institute, Responsible Statecraft, has gone so far as to call it a suicide mission:


Kharg Island has been on the map for Pentagon planners for decades. President Jimmy Carter weighed bombing it or seizing it during the 1979 Iran Hostage Crisis but demurred. Incredibly, in 1988, Donald Trump himself suggested seizing Kharg during his "Art of the Deal" book tour.

Today, Kharg appears to be back in the headlines thanks to Michael Rubin, an American Enterprise Institute scholar and former Iraq Coalition Provisional Authority official who says taking Kharg is a “no-brainer” and has pitched the operation to White House officials.

...The tactical picture is even worse. For the troops unlucky enough to receive orders to take Kharg, the operation would land somewhere between a suicide mission and a self-imposed hostage crisis.

Given the size of the objective (five miles long), the substantial civilian population there, the need to hold it indefinitely, and the lack of surprise, the U.S. would need thousands of troops for the mission. Available units include the incoming MEU’s 1,200-strong Marine battalion landing team, the 82nd Airborne’s “ready brigade” (the 82nd just cancelled scheduled maneuvers, fueling speculation that it could be headed to the Middle East), the 75th Ranger Regiment, and other quick-to mobilize units, or even regular Army battalions already deployed to Kuwait. In theory, Trump has over 10,000 troops at his disposal in coming weeks, though there’s been no public discussion of sending that large a force (yet).

Even if the US did take Kharg, this would immediately present the next problem of 'what next?'. The US would have to hold it, perhaps while waiting for some kind of political capitulation from Tehran which is unlikely to come. 

Indefinitely defending a strategic island so deep in Iran's own backyard and territory, with all the logistical challenges, would present all new challenges.

Getting closer to boots on the ground?...that one thing Trump repeatedly pledged never to do: