Thursday, July 16, 2026

US expands strikes into Tehran area as Iran threatens to ‘resist until the end’


US expands strikes into Tehran area as Iran threatens to ‘resist until the end’


The United States intensified its strikes targeting Iran early Thursday, hitting targets further north and into the Tehran area, as the Islamic Republic expanded its attacks on US allies in the region and vowed to “resist until the end.”

Days of back-and-forth strikes by the US and Iran across the Middle East — and renewed threats to the Strait of Hormuz — have shredded the interim deal to end the Iran war and could tip the region back into all-out war. Iranian officials say US strikes have killed more than 35 people and wounded over 300.

US strikes reached into areas around Iran’s capital, Tehran, for the first time in the latest round of violence, showing a widening set of targets for the Americans.

Iranian state media also reported American attacks in the northern Semnan province, home to Iran’s ballistic missile production and space program.

Other strikes were reported in the provinces of Hamedan, Hormozgan, Khuzestan, Lorestan, Markazi, and Sistan and Baluchistan.

“US forces struck Iranian command centers, air defense sites, missile and drone capabilities, and coastal surveillance facilities,” the US military said in a statement, adding it also hit targets in Bandar Abbas, home to Iran’s largest port and to key navy and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps facilities on the Strait of Hormuz.

In the Persian Gulf, the US military began to enforce Trump’s newly reinstated naval blockade of Iranian ports, and said it opened fire on the Curacao-flagged oil tanker Belma sailing toward Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export terminal. After the ship “ignored multiple warnings,” a US aircraft disabled the merchant vessel by firing a missile into the ship’s smokestack.

Another American strike Wednesday targeted a barracks for Iran’s 388th Mechanized Infantry Brigade, which operates tanks and armored vehicles, in Sistan and Baluchestan province, Iranian state television reported. The report said Americans fired at least 13 missiles in the attack and the seven dead included conscripts and career soldiers. A number of troops were wounded.

Iran retaliated with missile and drone fire targeting Bahrain, Jordan and Kuwait before dawn and the Iranian military’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters warned its attacks may escalate.

“All the infrastructure in the region will be crushed under the steel blows of the powerful armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran” should US President Donald Trump’s threat to target Iranian infrastructure be carried out, said Brigadier General Mohammad Akraminia. Trump on Tuesday threatened to hit Iranian power plants and bridges next week unless Tehran resumes negotiations.

“Under no circumstances and in no way will we allow America, as a foreign and extra-regional country, to interfere in the Strait of Hormuz,” the Iranian military spokesman added. “This is Iran’s invincible red line.”

“The Americans thought that by attacking some of our bases on the southern coasts of the country, they could take control of this strategic strait,” Akraminia said.

“However, the Islamic Republic of Iran has the ability to exert control over the Strait of Hormuz from every single point of its territory, and this matter is never dependent on coasts and islands,” he said.

Turning toward its Arab neighbors, Iran threatened to continue its attacks on their soil as long as they allow US forces to be stationed there.

“Our neighbors should know that providing a base to the Americans and allowing them to fire on Iranian soil is unacceptable and will not go unanswered,” Iran‘s army said in a statement, just as it announced several more attacks on Gulf countries.

There was no immediate acknowledgment of damage or casualties from the attacks.

Meanwhile, Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi condemned an overnight drone attack on the city of Erbil in Iraq’s semiautonomous northern Kurdish region. The drone, which authorities said had been intercepted, came during his trip to the US in which he said Iraq would work to disarm non-state armed groups, including those backed by Iran.

Report: Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon could begin within 'hours'


Report: Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon could begin within 'hours'


Sources in the Lebanese presidential palace told the Lebanese television channel MTV that the second day of negotiations in Rome witnessed more significant progress, and the discussions became practical and detailed regarding the implementation mechanisms of the framework agreement.

According to the sources, the parties discussed the timeline for the start of the withdrawal from the pilot areas in southern Lebanon. The officials claimed that all preparations are being made so that the withdrawal will begin in the upcoming days or even within hours. They added that an announcement is expected to define the exact date and expressed hope that the process would not be delayed beyond the weekend.


According to the sources, further discussions are expected later to establish a timetable for Israeli withdrawals from additional areas beyond the pilot zones. Regarding the verification mechanism to ensure that the areas are demilitarized of weapons belonging to Hezbollah, the sources said that the information would be passed to a third party.

"We are open to the American vision, and we have a natural tendency to prefer that UN bodies like UNIFIL handle the verification. Several proposals are being discussed," the officials said.

Furthermore, sources in the palace of Lebanese President Joseph Aoun emphasized, "Any meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu is something that is flatly rejected. Aoun's visit to Washington will include a meeting with Trump and perhaps with several senior officials. The visit will be very quick."

US official: Israel withdraws from parts of security zone in Lebanon

The official described the move as "a gesture of goodwill" toward the Lebanese government. Israel has denied the report, while the IDF stresses: We were not instructed to withdraw.

A US State Department official told Reuters that Israel had withdrawn from parts of the security zone in southern Lebanon. According to the official, the move was "a gesture of goodwill" toward the Lebanese government.

Israel has yet to issue an official response to the report, but a senior Israeli security official denied it in a conversation with Reuters, making clear that Israel's policy is clear: The IDFwill not withdraw from the buffer zone, and its forces are still enforcing control of the area against anyone who approaches it, including Lebanese Army soldiers. Troops on the ground told Israel Hayom, "We have not received any instruction to move from the area where we are stationed."

Later, sources told Al-Arabiya that Lebanon and Israel had reached an agreement in principle on the pilot areas for withdrawal. According to the sources, a declaration of intent is expected to be published after the two sides reach an agreed-upon text. However, a Lebanese military official briefed that so far, no withdrawal of IDF troops had taken place, and they remain deployed in areas captured in southern Lebanon.

Several days ago, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made clear that even amid contacts between Israel and Lebanon in Washington, "We will remain in the security zone in southern Lebanon for as long as necessary to protect our dear residents of the north and all citizens of the state. As prime minister of Israel, I insist on this firmly, and nothing will change that," he said.

Defense Minister Israel Katz also declared Wednesday, "Israel will not withdraw from Lebanon, even if the Americans demand it." Speaking at the Muni Expo 2026 local government conference, Katz added that "the soldiers have full freedom of action to defend themselves."

Yashar! chairman and former Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot also addressed the diplomatic sensitivity at the conference, saying, "We have reached a situation in which there has been no approval to blow up tunnels in recent days. The president of the US is asking the president of Syria to deal with Hezbollah. There has never been anything like this."


The New Third Front: China Quietly Revamps Country for War




An interesting series of reports have shone light on China’s ‘quiet’ but revolutionary preparations for conflict with the US. China has mastered the art of the silent observer. Legions of commentators spent years criticizing China for not being more active and involved in the global geopolitical theaters, such as the Russia-Ukraine war, particularly when tilting those conflicts in its own favor would have greatly benefited China.

But now portions of China’s strategy are finally coming to light, and revealing the country’s uniquely furtive approach to maintaining a semblance of balance while in actuality making unprecedented hidden preparations for the worst case scenarios.


Russian analysis: China has accelerated construction of a comprehensive national-resilience system intended to withstand sanctions, blockade, supply-chain collapse, natural disasters and potentially major war.

This refers to the recent report from Russia’s Global Affairs defense journal called, “The New Great Wall: The Logic of China’s Foreign Policy Behavior”:



These measures are not noticeable but are an important component of the general trend towards total securitization of all aspects of Chinese policy (even, e.g., culture and ecology) per Xi Jinping’s Holistic Security Concept.

The authors note that this policy flies in the face of China’s “outward” facade of optimism for humanity, showing that at their core, Chinese leadership are pragmatic adherents of realpolitik:

The measures’ extreme cost indicates that, although the Chinese leadership advances optimistic conceptions like the Community of Common Destiny for Mankind and a “universally beneficial, inclusive economic globalization,” the leadership actually adheres to an extremely bleak outlook for the world in the 21st century.


The Russian authors believe the measures indicate China is internally preparing for worst-case scenario outcomes:

It is preparing—at the very least—for a severe military and political crisis, including the disruption of all normal economic ties and a slide to the brink of war. At worst, it is preparing for even more nightmarish scenarios.

In effect, what is happening is that China is quietly watching and learning from the mistakes of all its counterparts, particularly Russia and Iran, and is restructuring its own internal policies and protective apparatuses toward avoiding the exact kind of traps that Russia had fallen into in Ukraine.

What “trap”, precisely, do we mean? One word suffices—it is the trap of vulnerability.

China appears to be keenly reassembling its infrastructure in order to be as least exposed as possible to any of the multifarious Western hybrid-war vectors in existence, from kinetic to economic.

How is China going about this?

By relocating strategic industries farther inland to the “rear”, to avoid precisely the type of things being seen in Russia now; strengthening its national energy grid, again to avoid the weaknesses seen both in the Russian and Iranian theaters; and much more.




AI Servers Will Consume More Power than All Conventional Data Centers Combined by 2027


Experts: AI Servers Will Consume More Power than All Conventional Data Centers Combined by 2027



Global data center electricity consumption is projected to surge 26 percent this year, reaching 565 terawatt-hours as AI workloads push power demand to unprecedented levels, according to new forecasts from research firm Gartner.

Tom’s Hardware reports that worldwide data center electricity consumption will climb from 447 terawatt-hours in 2025 to 565 terawatt-hours in 2026, marking a 26 percent increase driven primarily by compute-intensive AI applications. The research indicates that power availability has emerged as a critical constraint limiting AI expansion across the industry.

According to the Gartner forecast, worldwide power demand is expected to increase 27 percent to 132 gigawatts over the same period, up from 104 gigawatts in 2025. 

The firm projects that total consumption will surpass 1,200 terawatt-hours by 2030. The gigawatt measurement reflects peak capacity that requires construction, permitting, and grid connection, while terawatt-hours measure actual electricity drawn throughout the year. Both metrics are rising faster than utilities can expand supply infrastructure.

“Surging demand for compute-intensive AI workloads is driving unprecedented data center power growth, while AI capacity is now constrained by power availability, making data center power security the new battle ground for scaling and protecting margins in the global AI race,” said Gartner Direct Analyst Linglan Wang.


The research reveals a dramatic shift in power consumption patterns between AI-optimized and conventional server infrastructure. AI-optimized servers consumed approximately 95 terawatt-hours globally in 2025 and are projected to draw 175 terawatt-hours in 2026, representing an 84 percent increase. Gartner anticipates this figure will reach 258 terawatt-hours in 2027, marking the first time AI-optimized hardware will consume more electricity than conventional servers.

AI-optimized servers currently represent 31 percent of total data center power consumption in 2026, up from roughly 20 percent the previous year. Cooling systems also consume a growing portion of electricity, with power used for cooling forecast to climb 22.6 percent in 2026 to 195 terawatt-hours, reflecting the thermal demands of denser AI rack configurations and continued capacity expansion.

Regional electrical grids are experiencing significant strain from this growth. More than 75 data center projects valued at $130 billion were blocked in early 2026 due to opposition over power and water resource concerns. Some operators have resorted to installing on-site gas generators to activate capacity without waiting for grid connections. In Virginia, one county requested employees conserve electricity as data center demand drove utility rates higher.

More...


The Middle East at the Crossroads of Global Power, Energy and Nuclear Risk


The Middle East at the Crossroads of Global Power, Energy and Nuclear Risk


Some news stories disappear before the coffee gets cold. Others refuse to leave, quietly growing in the background while the public moves on to the next headline. The recent military confrontation involving the United States and Iran belongs to the second category. Every new strike, every satellite image, every emergency statement issued from Washington, Tehran, Moscow or Brussels appears to last only a few hours before another development replaces it. 

Yet beneath that relentless flow of information lies something far more significant than the individual events themselves. Military planners, intelligence agencies and energy markets are no longer reacting to isolated incidents. They are watching a chain of events whose significance comes from the way each piece connects to the next.

The Middle East has occupied this position before. Geography alone almost guaranteed it. Stretching between Europe, Asia and Africa, sitting astride some of the world’s most important maritime routes and containing a substantial share of global oil and gas reserves, the region has never been just another part of the map. 

For more than a century it has been a place where local rivalries, religious divisions, energy security and the interests of outside powers collide. Rarely has any crisis remained confined within its borders for long. Even when the fighting stayed local, its consequences travelled through financial markets, shipping routes and diplomatic alliances with remarkable speed.

Recent developments have once again reminded governments how interconnected these pressures have become. Commercial vessels crossing strategic waterways now operate under heightened security concerns. Insurance premiums fluctuate with every escalation. Energy traders monitor military briefings as closely as production figures. 


Intelligence satellites spend more time observing infrastructure than weather systems. None of these reactions necessarily indicates that a wider war is inevitable. They do, however, illustrate how quickly regional instability can ripple through a globalized economy in which supply chains, financial systems and security commitments are tightly intertwined.

One of the defining characteristics of the Middle East is that very few conflicts remain isolated. Political rivalries overlap with religious divisions, economic interests intersect with security alliances, and local disputes frequently attract the involvement of outside powers. 

This interconnected landscape has forced military analysts to think less in terms of individual battlefields and more in terms of regional systems. Air defense networks, missile ranges, naval deployments, energy infrastructure and cyber capabilities now interact in ways that were almost unimaginable a generation ago.

 A disruption in one strategic waterway can affect shipping costs on another continent. A cyberattack targeting energy infrastructure can influence global commodity markets within hours. Political decisions made during emergency cabinet meetings often reach financial trading floors before they reach the evening news.

For decades, analysts have described the Middle East as one of the world’s most complex geopolitical environments. That description is no longer sufficient. Complexity has been joined by speed. Decisions that once unfolded over weeks can now reshape international markets before sunrise. Information travels instantly, military assets reposition rapidly, and governments face increasing pressure to respond before complete information becomes available. The modern crisis rarely waits for perfect understanding.