"Next Chapter Of Chaos Is Coming":

"Next Chapter Of Chaos Is Coming":

TYLER DURDEN

French trade unions are now coordinating nationwide strikes amid an ongoing far-left revolution, lawfare against right-wing leader Jair Bolsonaro following socialist President Lula's runoff victory in Brazil, and Poland's coup d’état by the pro-EU regime should not be viewed in a vacuum. This is the globalist playbook of street mobilization, lawfare, and chaos across the West, which all could be repackaged by the Democratic Party and used to launch a revenge cycle against the Trump administration for nuking their nation-killing DEI experiment and disrupting timelines of a socialist takeover of the US.

 The end goal has always been to crash the Trump economy and destroy capitalism - full stop. 

Just hours after the Democratic sweep in the US midterms, Democrats, oddly enough, did not boast about their affordability plan but instead fired up their Trump revenge agenda, signaling their move to target companies, Elon Musk, and anyone else associated with Trump. 

Next, NGOs and lefty trade unions, aligned with socialist reformists and Democrats, could easily take a page from France's far-left uprising playbook and move forward with this strategy. 

Anti-communist analyst Karlyn Borysenko cites United Auto Workers (UAW) President Shawn Fain's statements that the union is planning labor action for "May Day 2028."

Borysenko continued:

The next part of the chaos will be what exactly is happening in France as socialists and communists groups revolt in what can only be described as a revolution that now has lefty trade unions joining forces to push with nationwide strikes. 

What happens here is going to build on what we're going to do in '27 going towards May 8th 2028. So May Day 2028 is the day that all the unions have organized their contracts to expire on the same day. So basically all the major labor unions led by the United Auto Workers — this is who this is — they are going to go on strike on the same day, May 1st 2028. The goal being to shut down the economy for an extended period of time.

They are organizing with all major labor unions. They have been organizing this for years already. They have been planning for this moment. They've been building for this moment. They've been doing structured tests leading up to this moment. This is going to be a big deal.

Should I mark my calendar to be back here in 2028 for a general strike?

I'd say we got big plans for 2028, so I'll reach out. By the way, give me a little behind the scenes: whoever his PR people were not happy that he said that. Whoever — because technically a general strike is not legal in the United States of America underneath our horrendous labor laws. But that was a very good job by you.

Are you telling me that one of the leaders of one of the largest labor unions in the country — the labor unions that have led the effort to plan for a May Day 2028 mass general strike on May 1st — you're telling me he openly admitted last night on a live stream to doing something that perhaps isn't the most legal thing in the world for him to do? Huh? I wonder why no conservative news outlet has reported this. 

What should be quite obvious today is that globalists have accelerated their timeline for a socialist takeover of the West and, in doing so, will take an all-hands-on-deck approach to wrecking Trump and his economy over the next two years. First comes lawfare, then NGOs and unions mobilize, and who knows what wild cards could emerge in a Poland-style coup d’état.

All of this suggests globalists are moving full speed ahead, and the unfolding European crisis of social unrest and turmoil may be heading for American shores.

What Democrats did not anticipate, and what really irks them, is that the Trump administration has already laid the groundwork to combat far-left extremist and foreign subversion networks through a multi-agency approach that, according to the New York Post, extends into the Treasury Department

Stephen Miller being named as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy sent Democrats screaming by the end of the week - that's because Miller will likely ramp up the campaign against the far-left. 

Remember, Secretary of State Marco Rubio called for the civilized world to unite against an “encroaching darkness.” That darkness he is talking about is exactly what you see playing out in Europe and what has infected the Democratic Party with far-left lunatics who rail against the nation and seek its imminent demise.

The civilizational crisis in America is about to accelerate. The players are known: socialist/communist vs. pro-America. 

The 2026 Global Governance Forum

The Globalists Just Came Out Of Hiding For A Secretive Summit In China

Brandon Smith

Lynn Forester de Rothschild openly announced the creation of the “Council for Inclusive Capitalism” in conjunction with the Pope and the Vatican; an organization devoted to woke socialist control of every facet of the corporate and economic world.

Of course, it was only a matter of time before they popped up again. Sure, there have been Davos meetings and the WEF still exists, but most elitist meetings have been limited to smaller climate change conferences. Nothing substantial in which global planning is discussed, until recently…

It is perhaps not coincidental that the globalists just held a discreet summit at the end of October, right before the US midterms, and in China of all places.

The 2026 Global Governance Forum is a Chinese funded event with extremely limited press coverage; the first such forum China has ever hosted. It received minor lip service from Reuters and a couple other outlets, but press on the scene was mostly restricted to CCP approved media, and they only covered the opening and closing ceremonies.

Details of the 22 round table discussions held at the forum are limited or non-existent, and the list of 180 overseas guests is largely confidential. Klaus Schwab was there, along with a few other publicly announced notables including:

Gerhard Schröder (former Chancellor of Germany) 

Klaus Schwab (founder of the World Economic Forum) 

Thomas L. Friedman (New York Times columnist) 

Guy Ryder (UN Under-Secretary-General for Policy) 

John L. Thornton (co-chair, Board of Trustees, Asia Society) 

David Shambaugh (political scientist) 

Helga Zepp-LaRouche (founder, Schiller Institute) 

Erik Solheim (former UN Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director of UNEP)

Andrea Renda (director of research, Centre for European Policy Studies) 

Topics reportedly focused on globalist operations in Asia, with the Chinese-Globalist relationship being strengthened. There were also mentions of AI development, the “governance” of outer space, UN reform and streamlining, as well as an announcement of a “Global Governance Research Center.”

Motivations include the Trump Administration’s tariffs, which have been rather useful in disrupting globalist efforts to homogenize national economies. Their solution is obviously to shift away from the US to a new consumer engine, but such an engine simply doesn’t exist.

The conference seems to support the theory that the elites are attempting to build a coalition between Europe and China in an effort to mitigate conservative movements in the US. European officials and even Canadian leaders have been boasting about their plans to rely more on China as a global economic partner.

This is a foolish notion given that China is a manufacturing economy, not a consumer economy. They might have a billion people, but the average yearly wage in China outside of government jobs is only $10,000 USD per year with no expendable income. The average annual wage for government jobs is around $16,000 USD.

I suspect this rhetoric is fodder for the uninformed liberal peasantry; a way to get them hyped up about breaking from the US economy and “punishing the capitalists” without considering the true consequences (we’re seeing those consequences hitting Canadians right now).

The forum closed with its “Global Governance: Xiongan Vision”document. The document describes the world as entering a “new period of turbulence” and argued that “multilateralism” (global government) is the only viable way to address the governance deficit (whatever that means). They urged safeguarding and improving the UN’s central role in this effort.

The message also advocated for greater Global South participation in rule-making, agenda-setting, and decision-making. And, it promoted the the UN’s 2030 Agenda with preparations for a post-2030 world. Whatever was discussed behind closed doors, we may never know.

Some people might be surprised that China is hosting such a forum – The predominant narrative in conspiracy circles is that China is “anti-globalist.” As I’ve said for many years, this is a false paradigm. From 2016 onward, China has been deeply attached to globalist systems, including the IMF’s global currency basket (the SDR). They have been calling for the globalists to introduce a new world currency, controlled by the IMF, for well over a decade.

China IS the New World Order; or at least, it’s a prototype for the NWO. The country is an ongoing beta-test for some of the most horrifying authoritarian systems ever devised. Globalists love communists, because they are communists.

A significant part of the globalist agenda is exploiting the concept of “reparations” for developing nations. They argue that wealthy nations have somehow benefited unfairly or stolen from third world nations. That is to say, they are trying to blame the failures and incompetence of the third world on the west as if we are the cause.

Take one guess who gets to be in charge of the wealth redistribution…

The elites also claim that the success of the west is hurting the climate, which is harming developing nations through dangerous weather. There is zero evidence to support this, but it doesn’t matter. They don’t actually care about saving third worlders, this is about centralized control of global production and the idea of reparations is a great way to get third worlders onboard.

The purpose of globalism is to undermine western civilization while homogenizing national economies into one system. This process requires a broad collective of leftist governments, corporations and NGOs working in tandem, and that is what is being engineered right now with events like the Chinese Global Governance Forum.

Then comes the homogenization of the west and the “Global South” using mass immigration and multiculturalism, until all vestiges of western culture are erased.

The job of these institutions leading up to 2030 will be to set the stage for the eradication of conservative and patriot movements. Or, to isolate us as the great villains of the story while the globalists swoop in to “save the day.” Their victory requires that conservatives remain disorganized and fractured, so that we are always on the defensive rather than the offensive. They need us inactive, so that they can piece together their one-world system without interference.

New US strikes on Iran raise fears of wider war as Tehran issues stark warning

New US strikes on Iran raise fears of wider war as Tehran issues stark warning

Associated Press

President Donald Trump said the U.S. military on Friday carried out new limited strikes on Iran, targeting its air defense systems. Iranian state media reported the sound of two explosions in the Suza area of Qeshm Island, which is in the crucial waterway for oil shipments.

Trump in an exchange with reporters described the military action as "minor."

“They knocked out — they built a little bit of an anti-aircraft device and we knocked it out in about 15 minutes, maybe five," Trump told reporters shortly after arriving in West Palm Beach, Florida, on Friday evening.

Against this backdrop, Iran's military warned Saturday that its forces were stronger than at the beginning of the war and prepared to respond immediately to any attack, without geographical restrictions.

"The armed forces of the Islamic Republic are now on higher alert and more powerful than they were at the beginning of the war," military spokesman Mohammad Akraminia said, according to the official IRNA news agency.

"On the orders of the supreme leader, any response by the armed forces will be immediate, effective and without geographical limits," he added.

The U.S. military also reported carrying out what it described as defensive strikes on Monday. Explosions were heard on the islands of Qeshm and Hengam in the strategic Strait of Hormuz, and in the nearby mainland area of Bandar Abbas.

Iran's military also claimed to have destroyed a U.S. military drone over Qeshm Island following the reported explosions Friday night, according to Iranian media. The claim could not be independently verified.

Earlier Friday, two Middle East government officials said Iran was reviewing proposals presented by chief mediator Qatar aimed at addressing differences with the United States about Tehran’s nuclear program.

But one of the officials stressed that the Iranians, at least at the moment, remain unwilling to engage in negotiations with the Trump administration over its atomic activities until the U.S. agrees to several core conditions that Iran has been demanding be part of any ceasefire agreement.

Iran insists on several concessions before nuclear talks

The White House declined to comment about the Qatari-presented proposals on Iran's nuclear program, but Trump noted earlier Friday in an exchange with reporters that mediators' discussions with Iran continue.

“We are talking to Iran. We have been,” said Trump, who insists the U.S. military remains in control of the conflict with a battered Iran.

Yet, Tehran insists on several concessions from the U.S., which Trump has declined in the past. Among the core demands Iran says must be met before engaging in nuclear talks: ending the U.S. blockade on Iran’s ports, lifting sanctions, unfreezing its assets, issuing compensation for war damage, and ending hostilities throughout the region, including Israeli operations in Lebanon.

Iranian military spokesman Mohammad Akraminia reiterated Saturday that Tehran would reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial route for global energy shipments, only if Washington accepted its conditions.

Qataris and Iranians discuss a bridge deal to get to nuclear talks

Mediators and Iran have discussed a potential bridge deal aimed at helping pave the way for further talks on Tehran’s nuclear program, according to regional officials.

They said the proposal, which was recently presented to the two sides by Qatari mediators, called for implementing trust-building measures over the course of two days.

These measures include lifting the U.S. blockade and releasing some of the billions of dollars in Iranian frozen funds seized over the years as part of a U.S. campaign to isolate Iran over its nuclear program. In return, Tehran would allow International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors at its sites bombed by the U.S. and Israel, the officials said.

On the second day, Iran would reopen the Strait of Hormuz in line with a modified agreement that Iran and Oman have reached on the waterway but has not been approved by the United States, the officials said. That mechanism would be temporary until a permanent deal is reached on the strait in cooperation with other Gulf countries, they said.

Following the implementation of the measures, the U.S. and Iran would embark on extensive talks addressing Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium as well as other aspects of its program, the officials said.

Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran has 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium that is enriched up to 60% purity, a short, technical step from weapons-grade levels of 90%.

Diplomatic efforts pick up following US election

A flurry of diplomatic phone calls in recent days between leaders in the Persian Gulf and beyond has been aimed at easing tensions in the region. Concerns have mounted over the possibility that Trump could still order the U.S. military to carry out new strikes against Iran.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth spoke on Friday with his Qatari counterpart, Sheikh Saoud bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, about developments, according to the Qatari government.

The Qatari government announced the call between the countries’ defense officials after confirming earlier Friday that Trump and Qatar’s emir had a separate call to discuss efforts to deescalate tensions.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also held phone calls with his Iraqi and Tunisian counterparts on Friday to discuss tensions in the region. Araghchi discussed with Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein Tehran’s vision for resuming negotiations with the U.S., according to Iraq’s News Agency.

Eisenkot pushes for emergency government

Eisenkot pushes for emergency government

Israel National News

Yashar Party chairman Gadi Eisenkot said Friday that significant progress had been made in negotiations to establish a national emergency government, expressing hope that President Isaac Herzog would grant him the mandate to form the next government early next week.

In a lengthy statement published on social media ahead of Shabbat, Eisenkot warned that Israel was facing a national emergency and accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of endangering the country's democratic institutions by remaining in office.

"Israel is facing a genuine, tangible, and dangerous national emergency. The current government threatens the very foundations of Israeli democracy, no less. All this while the various fronts of the war remain active and are themselves subject to political and personal whims. Israel is already in the midst of a dangerous diplomatic tsunami."

Eisenkot said he had been working with his political partners in recent days to advance a plan for quickly forming a government based on four Zionist parties committed to political change, while allowing additional factions and Knesset members to join if they accepted his principles.

"We must quickly establish stable and responsible leadership, prevent another round of elections, and stop outgoing Prime Minister Netanyahu from clinging to power. His dangerous determination to remain in the Prime Minister's Office has come at a heavy and dramatic cost, as we have witnessed with even greater intensity in recent days."

The Yashar chairman pointed to the consultations at the President's Residence as evidence that Netanyahu no longer commanded the support of a parliamentary majority.

"The consultations at the President's Residence painted a clear and unequivocal picture: An absolute majority of Knesset members support change and my serving as prime minister. By contrast, only 46 Knesset members support Benjamin Netanyahu remaining in office. In effect, 74 Knesset members have not expressed confidence in Netanyahu continuing as prime minister."

He warned against allowing Netanyahu to continue overseeing the country's security and law enforcement institutions while serving as caretaker prime minister.

"A situation in which a minority caretaker prime minister, who has lost the public's confidence so decisively, continues to control the defense establishment and law enforcement authorities is dangerous and must not be allowed to continue for even one more day."

Eisenkot insisted that replacing the government was consistent with the election results.

"This is the decision of the people. This is the will of the voters. This is the mandate we were given in the elections."

Addressing the ongoing coalition negotiations, Eisenkot said his team had conducted dozens of hours of discussions, including meetings that had not been publicly disclosed.

"I have found that my partners in the bloc understand the gravity of this moment. We have made significant progress and achieved breakthroughs, quietly and modestly, with much more happening behind the scenes than is publicly known."

He added, "That is how we operate. Not through media briefings or political spin."

Eisenkot expressed optimism that the negotiations would allow him to begin formally assembling a coalition in the coming days.

"I sincerely hope that early next week I will receive the mandate to form a government."

He reiterated that his proposed emergency government would be based on four principles: recognition of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, acceptance of the values of the Declaration of Independence, mandatory military, national or civilian service for all, and recognition of Hamas as a terrorist organization alongside a commitment to dismantle its military and governing capabilities.

Nothing Is Happening By Accident: France Is a Laboratory of the New World Order

France Is a Laboratory of the Elite’s New World Order

ByVigilant Citizen

The “student protests” in France were not protests, and those behind them were not students. Those who organized them operate in the shadows, and those who carry out their orders are better described as urban guerrillas.

French President Emmanuel Macron himself stated:

“Last Saturday we had political and seditious acts ​by ultra-left groups whose aim is to bring down the Republic.”

Of course, Macron stating these words is rather ironic, as he is one of the architects of this mess. Indeed, his government engineered this situation through policies custom-made to “bring down the republic.”

Macron is one of Klaus Schwab’s “proteges.” Like Canada’s Justin Trudeau, these WEF-sponsored politicians enable nation-destroying policies such as massive, uncontrolled immigration. The slogan in this picture, “Committed to improving the state of the world,” could not be more ironic.

What’s happening in France is part of a diabolical plan, and the elite wants it to spread across the Western world. None of this is happening by accident, and it has all been carefully calculated.

To understand the wider picture, you must first understand the occult elite’s ultimate goal: to create a New World Order, characterized by a single world government, currency, culture, and religion. To achieve this goal, they must first break down nations from within and rebuild them “in their image,” inside a New World Order.

If you’ve wondered why some governments, from city mayors to Presidents of countries, seem to be actively working against their people, that is why. Powerful globalist entities such as the World Economic Forum and George Soros’ Open Society Foundation fund massively candidates sold to their agendas at every government level. The raison d’etre of these governments is simple: To oversee the destruction of their territories from within.

For countries to fully integrate into a New World Order, a drastic transformation must happen first: They must erase their national cultures, identities, histories, and traditions. All countries must adopt a single globalist culture with values that fit the elite’s authoritarian goals. France is particularly advanced in this multi-faceted process.

The first and crucial step to destabilize a country is to allow massive, uncontrolled immigration that goes beyond what it can absorb.

The elite are very aware of the profound effects of mass immigration on a country’s stability, economy, and social climate. They’ve conducted studies, and they’ve used models to simulate the outcome they desire. None of what they do is random or uncalculated.

Furthermore, by allowing a number of immigrants that is much greater than a country’s ability to absorb, the elite purposely creates a class of underprivileged (and often undocumented) people with lower living conditions and much fewer opportunities. This creates a fertile breeding ground for the elite to recruit foot soldiers to do their bidding.

Indeed, through “woke-style” propaganda, minorities are trained to resent their host country and become weaponized by the elite.

Another (very predictable) side-effect of mass immigration and its weaponization is the radicalization of the other side. Some French cities became the theatre of violent clashes between protesters and counter-protesters. Some described it as “left-wing versus right-wing” or even “communists against fascists.” Whatever the case may be, the net result is the elite’s favorite strategy: Divide and Conquer.

This is not to say that all immigration is bad. My parents are immigrants, so I’d be a bit of a hypocrite to be against it. However, there is a difference between controlled immigration and uncontrolled immigration, just as there’s a difference between drinking a glass of water and drowning in it.

What’s particularly ironic is that my parents immigrated from Lebanon because the country was in a civil war partly due to … mass immigration.

More...