Thursday, May 7, 2026

US, Iran said closing in on framework for permanent deal, as Trump renews bomb threats


US, Iran said closing in on framework for permanent deal, as Trump renews bomb threats



The White House reportedly believes it is nearing a one-page memorandum of understanding with Iran aimed at permanently ending the war and laying out a framework for monthlong talks on the regime’s nuclear program.

The US expects a response from Tehran within the next 48 hours, according to a Wednesday Axios report, which cited two US officials and two additional sources briefed on the matter.

The MoU consists of 14 points and is being crafted by US President Donald Trump’s top envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, together with several Iranian officials.

The MoU will reportedly include a moratorium on nuclear enrichment by Iran and provide for the shipment of highly-enriched uranium stockpiles out of Iran, in exchange for Washington lifting some of its sanctions on Tehran and releasing billions in the Islamic Republic’s frozen funds, in addition to both sides lifting restrictions around transit through the Strait of Hormuz.

Axios later reported that the document includes a clause stating that the deal “would end the war throughout the region, including in Lebanon.”

Such a clause would mark a significant shift, as the ceasefire reached last month with Iran did not extend to Lebanon, where Israel has been fighting against the Iran-backed terror group Hezbollah. Instead, a separate US-brokered truce was reached there between Israel and Lebanon, as both seek to keep the Lebanese front distinct from the Iranian file.

The plan would also declare an end to the war and trigger a 30-day negotiation period, in pursuit of more detailed agreements pertaining to the Strait of Hormuz, Iran’s nuclear program and US sanctions against the regime.

The US is seeking a moratorium on all uranium enrichment by Iran for at least 12 years, with a provision that would extend the moratorium if Iran were found to have violated it, Axios said. At the end of the negotiated period, the Islamic Republic would be allowed to enrich to the low, civilian-use level of 3.67%, while committing never to seek a nuclear weapon, or to carry out activities related to the development of nuclear weapons, and to submit to enhanced inspections, including snap inspections by the UN.

This would also be a major departure from repeated US pledges not to accept a deal that allows Iran to enrich at all. Trump has also long pilloried the nuclear deal signed by former president Barack Obama, which allowed Tehran to continue enriching at 3.67%.

Iran would agree to remove its existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium, with negotiators floating moving the material to the US, Axios said. A Channel 12 report later Wednesday said there was no agreement on which country would take the stockpile, and that Trump had told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in their latest call that without agreement on this issue, there would be no deal.

A clause being negotiated would also require Iran to commit not to operate underground nuclear facilities, the report said.

As the talks proceed, Iran and the US would gradually ease their operations in the Strait of Hormuz to allow shipping through the waterway and trade through Iranian ports, the report said.

But if negotiations collapse or fail to reach a deal, the US could restore the blockade or resume the war, according to a US official. The report cautioned that “nothing has been agreed yet,” but sources describe the current process as the closest the two sides have come to an agreement since the war started with joint American and Israeli airstrikes on February 28.

A Pakistani source involved in the mediation efforts confirmed the report to Reuters, saying, “We will close this very soon. We are getting close.”

Asked what the timeframe might be for Iran and the US to reach an agreement on a memorandum of understanding permanently ending the war between them, Trump responded, one week.

Fox News said Trump made the comment during a phone interview with the network, which added that the president sounded cautiously optimistic.

Trump has been known to give varying timelines pertaining to the Iran talks in the constant cold calls he takes from journalists.

Given Axios’s reporting that the US is expecting an Iranian response to the MOU within two days, it was unclear whether Trump was suggesting that an additional few days would still be needed after that.

Trump earlier Wednesday signaled support for the proposal in a post on Truth Social, saying the American war effort and blockade on Iran would end if Tehran accepts the terms.

“Assuming Iran agrees to give what has been agreed to, which is, perhaps, a big assumption, the already legendary Epic Fury will be at an end, and the highly effective Blockade will allow the Hormuz Strait to be OPEN TO ALL, including Iran,” Trump wrote.

MORE.....

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

China Wants Iran War End, Pushes 'Immediate' Hormuz Reopening During Araghchi Visit Ahead Of Trump-Xi Summit


 TYLER DURDEN


Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi is currently in Beijing meeting with his Chinese counterpart, FM Wang Yi, and the timing of the visit sends a resounding message to Washington and the West

The highly anticipated Trump-Xi meeting is still scheduled for next week, expected for May 14-15, though there has been ample speculation the ongoing events of the unpredictable Iran war and Hormuz Strait crisis could derail the trip at the last minute.

Of course, Iran and the question of peace will be high on the agenda as Trump visits - and currently it seems the White House is desperate to set in place some kind of final offramp, given the Tuesday night 'pause' in Project Freedom operations in the Gulf.

Upon the occasion of Araghchi's visit, Foreign Minister Wang has taken the opportunity to again call for the immediate opening of the strait. And the Iranian top diplomat seconded this at a moment the US Navy has imposed an effective blockade of Iranian ports, which of course severely impacts Iranian oil going to China. "Currently, it is possible to resolve the issue of reopening the Strait of Hormuz as soon as possible," Xinhua quoted Araghchi as saying.

Wang during the meeting also called for a "comprehensive ceasefire," saying his country is deeply distressed by the war. Xinhua further quoted him as saying:

"The international community shares a common concern for restoring normal and safe passage through the Strait, and China hopes the relevant parties will respond as quickly as possible to the strong calls from the international community."

The two sides are clearly coordinating their messaging to some degree, given Wang also expressed that China "appreciates Iran’s pledge to not develop nuclear weapons."

Tehran has for years insisted its program is only for peaceful nuclear energy development and for domestic needs, but has amid Trump's Operation Epic Fury made clear it will never given up its right to enriched uranium. It has said this is as "sacred as the soil" and sees it as a matter of national sovereignty. This in the face of US demands that it transfer all nuclear material out of the country.

More out of Beijing on Wednesday:

“We believe that a comprehensive ceasefire brooks no delay, a resumption of hostilities is inadvisable, and persisting with negotiations is particularly important,” Wang told Araghchi at the start of their meeting, according to footage released by Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV.

...Earlier, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China to press Iran to ease its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and gas passes.


As for what China gains in this high-level diplomacy and engagement with Tehran at a moment it could face more US and Israeli bombs, Associated Press presents the following:

Some noted that the Iranian foreign minister visited at Beijing’s initiative. "It’s China exercising their leverage... to summon the Iranian foreign minister," said Hoo Tiang Boon, a professor of Chinese foreign policy at Nanyang Technological University.

"By holding the talks with the Iranians, you can't fault for them not putting in any effort," Hoo said.

As for some further specifics to come out of the Araghchi-Wang meeting, Iran "expressed appreciation for China’s four-point proposal" - according to a readout in semi-official Iranian Students' News Agency (ISNA).


"Iran supports the formation of a new framework for the post-war period in the region" the readout adds. As for the 'four points' - these were issued by Beijing earlier in the conflict and are quite broad. These official points are featured below in their entirety, via Chinese state sources:

More...


US said to tell Israel that Iran showing ‘surprising openness’ on transferring its uranium stockpile overseas


US said to tell Israel that Iran showing ‘surprising openness’ on transferring its uranium stockpile overseas
TOI


US officials have told Israel they are “optimistic” about reaching a framework agreement with Iran on ending the war, according to a Channel 12 report. This assessment has also reportedly been conveyed by US President Donald Trump to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

According to the latest “update” conveyed to Israel by the Americans, Iran is showing “surprising openness” regarding the transfer of its stockpile of highly enriched uranium to a third country. But there is no agreement on which country that would be. Without agreement on this issue, Trump told Netanyahu in their latest call, there will be no deal, the report says, citing two Israeli officials.

Israel is concerned by the lack of attention being paid to the issue of Iran’s ballistic missile program, the report also says. Israel wants to see a clause in the framework agreement that would limit the range of Iranian ballistic missiles, even though there would be credible means of ensuring Iranian compliance with any such clause, or with any provisions intended to limit Iran’s ballistic missile production.

While “part of the Iranian leadership” is apparently open to “significant steps” on the path to a framework agreement, including on the issue of removing Iran’s uranium stockpile, Israel and the Americans are wary of the potential for Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to thwart such a deal, the report continues. Israel, it says, remains braced for all scenarios, including the collapse of the negotiations.


Emerging Iran deal said to include clause to end fighting in Lebanon


Emerging Iran deal said to include clause to end fighting in Lebanon


Elaborating on the terms of a reported one-page framework deal taking shape between the United States and Iran, Channel 12’s Barak Ravid says the agreement would include a ceasefire in Lebanon, separate from the one agreed to by Jerusalem and Beirut last month, which has reduced, but not stopped, the fighting.

The agreement “would end the war throughout the region, including in Lebanon,” according to the Hebrew network.

Such a move would mark a significant shift, as the ceasefire reached last month with Iran did not extend to Lebanon, where Israel has been fighting against Iran-backed terror group Hezbollah. Instead, a separate US-brokered truce was reached there between Israel and Lebanon, which both seek to keep the Lebanese front distinct from the Iranian file.

It is not clear from the report whether such a ceasefire would include the withdrawal of IDF troops from Lebanon or if it would instead restore the terms of the ceasefire that was in place from November 2024 until Hezbollah resumed its attacks on Israel over the war with Iran in March.


The Existence Of Israel As A Nation Alone Signifies That Today Is A Time Like No Other


The Existence Of Israel As A Nation Alone Signifies That Today Is A Time Like No Other



Most Christians believe that today is no different than any other previous period in human history. They remind us that there have been earthquakes, wars, severe famines, and pestilences throughout history. “So, what makes today unique?” they ask.

Israel. The existence of Israel as a nation alone signifies that today is a time like no other. The Lord told Isaiah that Israel would become a nation again in just one day (Isaiah 66:8), and on May 14, 1948, and just as He predicted so long ago, the Jewish state miraculously emerged after a 2,000-year absence. Nothing like that had ever happened throughout all of human history.

Many voices in the past pointed to Israel’s reemergence as a harbinger of the last days.

Irenaeus (AD 130-202), an early church leader and prominent theologian, wrote Against Heresies in AD 180 to combat the spread of Gnosticism. Writing 110 years after the Roman army under Titus destroyed the second Jewish temple, Irenaeus wrote that there would be a third temple that the antichrist would defile. He believed that at His Second Coming, Jesus would cast the defiler into the lake of fire, just as John wrote about in Revelation 19:19-20.

Later in life, Isaac Newton spent several years studying the books of Daniel and Revelation, writing copious notes. Six years after his death, others used his handwritten notations to publish his two-volume work, Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John. Newton’s detailed study of these books led to his prediction that Israel would again become a nation over 250 years before it happened. He recognized the necessary link between Israel’s reemergence as a nation and the fulfillment of future Bible prophecy.

In the early 1900s, many Bible scholars scoffed at C.I. Scofield because he wrote about the Gog/Magog battle of Ezekiel 38-39 with Russia leading an invasion of Israel. At the time, there was no Jewish state, and Russia was a Christian nation. Like Irenaeus and Isaac Newton, Scofield and others of his day knew that Israel would again become a nation because the Bible said it would happen in the latter days before Jesus’ Second Coming.

The events in Israel since 1948 also signify that our homegoing is ever so close. Based on their study of God’s Word, both Irenaeus and Isaac Newton believed there would be a Jewish temple in the last days. Although Israel doesn’t yet have control of the Temple Mount so as to start its construction, the Temple Institute in Jerusalem is training Levites to serve as priests. And the Israeli government is building and planning infrastructure to support the vast number of visitors who will come to see the future temple. It’s only a matter of time before a temple appears in Jerusalem in fulfillment of Bible prophecy.

The passion that currently exists within Israel to build the temple is what we would expect leading up to the seven-year Tribulation when the antichrist will fulfill prophecy by defiling it (Daniel 9:27Matthew 24:15-162 Thessalonians 2:3-8).

The current Middle East war also signifies that we live in the last days. The over-the-top determination of Iran and its proxies to destroy Israel is not rationally driven, but is, rather, demonically inspired. Before 1948, Satan inspired Hitler and the Nazis to kill all the Jews and thus prevent the formation of the Jewish state, which was already in the works. Since May 14, 1948, he has continued his dogged determination to wipe out Israel and thus thwart the Lord’s plans for Jerusalem and the Jews.

The heightened antisemitism of our day also signifies that our time is rather short before the Lord appears to take us up to glory. The Bible warns that there will be another holocaust during the second half of the seven-year Tribulation. What we already see in our day will become increasingly violent until it reaches its height during the last half of the Tribulation.

Israel’s existence puts all the other signs of the last days in perspective. The many signs warning that the seal judgments of Revelation chapter 6 are ever so near take on added significance because we know this is a time like no other, as the world’s attention on Jerusalem continues to grow, just like the Bible said would happen in the last days (Zechariah 12:1-3).

Israel’s existence also alerts us to the convergence of all the other signs, warning the world that the Tribulation period is rapidly approaching. For us, nothing has to happen prophetically between now and when we meet Jesus in the air.

As the signs of the last days continue to multiply, we know that it’s just a matter of time before our Savior appears and takes us to the place He’s preparing for us in Heaven (John 14:2-3).