Wednesday, February 11, 2026

US and Iran Are Heading for the Last Round-Up


US and Iran Are Heading for the Last Round-Up


Iranian negotiators have made clear to the Trump administration that while Iran is willing to discuss possible limits to its nuclear programs, it will not discuss the other items that the Americans demand be considered, including ending Iran’s ballistic missile discussion, its support for proxies, including Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Houthis in Yemen, and its murderous response to the millions of protesters who recently turned out in cities across Iran to shout “Death to the Dictator.”

Meanwhile, Israel watches in dismay as the Americans seem willing to continue negotiating with Tehran, even after it has said it will only negotiate on the nuclear issue. More on that Israeli alarm, and the possible unilateral action by Israel to destroy Iran’s ballistic missile threat, can be found here: “Israel warns Trump: We may act alone if Iran crosses ballistic missile red line,” by Avi Ashkenazi, Jerusalem Post, February 8, 2026:

Israeli defense officials recently told their US counterparts that Iran’s ballistic missile program represents an existential threat, and that Jerusalem is prepared to act unilaterally if necessary.

According to security sources, Israeli intentions to dismantle Iran’s missile capabilities and production infrastructure were conveyed in recent weeks through a series of high-level exchanges. Military officials outlined operational concepts to degrade the program, including strikes on key manufacturing sites.

In early February, both the head of the IDF, Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, and the new Commander of the Israeli Air Force, Major General. Omer Tishler, visited Washington D.C. to meet with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Dan Caine, to discuss operational plans regarding Iran.

“We told the Americans we will strike alone if Iran crosses the red line we set on ballistic missiles,” the source said, adding that Israel is not yet at that threshold but is continuously tracking developments inside Iran.

The officials stressed that Israel reserves freedom of action and emphasized that it will not allow Iran to restore strategic weapon systems on a scale that threatens Israel’s existence.

One defense official described the current moment as a “historic opportunity” to deliver a significant blow to Iran’s missile infrastructure and neutralize active threats to Israel and neighboring states.

During recent talks, Israel also presented plans to target additional facilities connected to the missile program, according to the official.

It is not just Iran’s remaining store of ballistic missiles that the Israelis plan to target, but also the plants, spread across Iran, where they are being manufactured.









Tuesday, February 10, 2026

Outages Are the Dress Rehearsal for What’s Coming


One Glitch Away From Chaos


It started early—just another Monday morning. You rolled over, hit the alarm, and asked Alexa for the weather. Silence. Your Ring camera was dead. The banking app wouldn’t load. Even your coffee maker’s “smart” setting was useless. You figured it was the Wi-Fi, until you saw the headlines: Amazon Web Services had crashed.

For a few hours, the modern world froze. Flights delayed. Payments stalled. People locked out of their own homes, cars, and accounts. Then, just as fast as it went down, everything started coming back online.

But what happens when it doesn’t? What happens when the fix never comes, when the “temporary outage” becomes the moment everyone realizes just how dependent—and vulnerable—we’ve all become?

Early this morning, Amazon Web Services went down—again. For several hours, the backbone of the modern internet collapsed, knocking out everything from Snapchat and Reddit to airline systems, payment apps, and even Ring home-security cameras.

This isn’t hyperbole, Amazon controls 30% of the global cloud-infrastructure market.

What happened today wasn’t just a “glitch.” It was a wake-up call for a world that’s gotten lazy, dependent, and too damn trusting of big tech. One internal failure inside Amazon Web Services—and suddenly banking apps, airlines, delivery systems, home security networks, and half the entertainment world froze in place. That’s not progress. That’s a single point of failure on a global scale.

People talk about preparedness like it’s a hobby. But this is why it matters. When one company’s servers hiccup and millions of people can’t communicate, shop, or even unlock their doors, it shows how fragile the entire digital foundation has become. This is about a culture that’s forgotten how to function without the cloud holding its hand.

At around 3:11 a.m. Eastern, Amazon’s U.S.-East-1 data region went down, taking huge portions of the web with it. Within minutes, major platforms started crashing. Snapchat, Reddit, Signal, and Roblox vanished. Airlines couldn’t process check-ins. Banks and payment apps froze. Even Amazon’s own warehouse systems stopped working.

By sunrise, engineers were still scrambling to fix it. The cause turned out to be internal network and DNS failures—the backbone that tells the internet where to find itself. In plain terms: one mistake inside one company temporarily erased access to a massive piece of modern life.

They got it back up, sure. But for hours, millions were blind and disconnected. And if a few lines of bad code can cause that kind of chaos, imagine what happens when it’s not an accident.

Amazon controls about a third of the world’s cloud infrastructure. Add Google and Microsoft, and nearly 70% of the internet depends on three companies. That means your email, your security cameras, your payment app, and probably your medical records all live in the same few server farms.

People like to think of “the cloud” as this infinite, magical place where their data is safe. It’s not. It’s just someone else’s computer, sitting in a warehouse, run by people you’ll never meet, bound by policies you’ll never see. And when that warehouse goes dark, so does your life.

We’ve reached the point where even basic day-to-day living—locking doors, paying bills, reading news—relies on a few private corporations never making a mistake. That’s not security. That’s dependency disguised as progress.

If They Can Turn It Off, You Don’t Own It

This isn’t just about losing access to a game or a website. It’s about control. When every device, app, and payment runs through centralized digital systems, you no longer own anything—you just have permission to use it.

Today’s outage should make people think hard about what happens in a fully cashless world. If a company glitch can lock you out of your money for a few hours, imagine what a Central Bank Digital Currency could do. It’s not just about convenience—it’s about surveillance, compliance, and control.


This time it was an internal error. Next time, it could be a coordinated attack, a rogue update, or an intentional shutdown. We’re not talking hypotheticals here. Over 85% of America’s critical infrastructure is privately owned—banks, grids, telecom, data—all of it. Oversight is inconsistent, security is weak, and attacks are increasing.

We’ve already seen what one company’s mistake can do. Now picture a targeted hit on several at once: payment systems jammed, communication networks failing, supply chains freezing in place. It wouldn’t take long before panic, shortages, and violence follow.

And that’s not fearmongering—it’s reality. When the digital leash breaks, society snaps with it.


Estimation: Iran will have about 2,000 ballistic missiles "within weeks"


Estimation: Iran will have about 2,000 ballistic missiles "within weeks"


Israeli officials spoke with CNN ahead of the expected meeting tomorrow (Wednesday) between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump regarding Iran's actions and the threats it poses.

"Netanyahu will emphasize to Trump the need for military freedom of action in Iran, even if an agreement is signed between Tehran and Washington," said the officials.

According to them, the Prime Minister intends to present new intelligence information to Trump on Iran's military capabilities, mainly regarding the rehabilitation of ballistic missiles.

The assessment in Israel is that, without intervention, Iran will possess up to 2,000 missiles within weeks or months.

Netanyahu flew this morning to Washington, D.C., for a diplomatic visit, during which he will meet with President Donald Trump. This is Netanyahu’s seventh visit to the U.S. since Trump's re-election.

Before his departure, Netanyahu said: "I am now going to the United States for my seventh trip to meet with President Trump since his re-election. This, of course, does not include his unforgettable visit to Israel and his speech in the Knesset."

"I think these things reflect the unique closeness in the exceptional relationship we have with the United States, personally with the president, and with Israel and the United States-a relationship that has never been like this in our history," he added.

Netanyahu clarified that the focus of the meeting will be on Iran and the diplomatic negotiations with it: "In this trip, we will discuss a number of issues-Gaza, the region-but of course, first and foremost, the negotiations with Iran. I will present to the president our views on the principles of the negotiations, the important principles, which I believe are important not only for Israel but for anyone in the world who wants peace and security in the Middle East."




Khamenei calls on Iranians to drive the enemy to despair


Khamenei calls on Iranians to drive the enemy to despair
JNS



Iran’s foreign minister vowed that Tehran will never abandon uranium enrichment, even if it means war with the United States.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Monday urged his nation to unify as the United States has been boosting its military presence in the Gulf region.

“The enemy must be driven to despair. The enemy’s despair comes through [our] unity, strength of thought and determination, and steadfastness in confronting the enemy’s temptations. These are what build national power,” Khamenei tweeted.

AFP cited the Iranian leader as calling on his citizens to show resolve ahead of the 47th anniversary this week of the Islamic Revolution that brought the mullahs to power.

Since 1979, “foreign powers have always sought to restore the previous situation,” he said, referring to the monarchy, as represented today by Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi.

“National power is less about missiles and aircraft and more about the will and steadfastness of the people. Show it again and frustrate the enemy,” Khamenei said.


Meanwhile in Israel, Blue and White Party leader Benny Gantz said on Monday that he hopes Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can convince the Trump administration to make a historic decision that would put an end to Iran as a strategic threat

Iran “is a regional challenge,” Gantz, a former IDF chief of staff and defense minister, told JNS.

“And I am also aware that it is a threat to the State of Israel. Nevertheless, it is not our business alone. … Iran is a global challenge,” he stressed.

“We are at the edge of a historic crossroad that I would say can affect the entire Middle East and, in a way, the entire global, the entire world, in terms of strategic threats, and I don’t think we should give Iran the next 50 years to play the role it did in the last 50 years,” he continued.

Gantz said he hopes “the prime minister can convince” U.S. President Donald Trump of his capacity to be the catalyst of this shift during Netanyahu’s visit to the White House scheduled for Feb. 11.

“The relations between Israel and the United States are very important, very candid relations, regardless of the political manipulation that [people are] trying to create. I hope that [Netanyahu and Trump] will have a productive conversation over there,” Gantz said.



China People’s Liberation Army’s Push for Political Loyalty May Signal Preparation for War


China People’s Liberation Army’s Push for Political Loyalty May Signal Preparation for War


The People’s Liberation Army has released new political regulations as Chinese leader Xi Jinping pushes for greater Party loyalty, a move that may mark a critical step in preparing the military for a potential war with the United States over Taiwan. The new rules formalize how Communist Party organizations conduct elections inside the armed forces, reinforcing institutional Party control over military governance.

They standardize the selection of Party delegates and leadership bodies at every level of the military, embedding Party authority directly into the PLA’s internal structure and ensuring that political oversight remains inseparable from command functions.

The PLA is a political army by design, built around absolute subordination to the Chinese Communist Party rather than professional military independence. Its governing doctrine holds that political loyalty to the CCP and to Xi Jinping as chairman of the Central Military Commission is the foundation of combat effectiveness, with ideological discipline treated as more important than technical skill or battlefield experience.

Party organizations are positioned as the core mechanism for leadership, cohesion, and operational effectiveness, with political reliability treated as a structural requirement. This reflects continuity with Mao-era revolutionary doctrine, in which the principle that “the Party commands the gun” remains central and the PLA exists first to defend Party rule rather than operate as an independent national military.

By institutionalizing Party elections across the PLA, the CCP reinforces its doctrine of absolute control over the armed forces. All outcomes are reviewed and approved by higher Party organs, ensuring advancement is limited to officers fully aligned with the Chairman Responsibility System and locking command authority into a top-down structure anchored in personal allegiance to Xi Jinping.

These measures are closely tied to the PLA’s 2027 centenary goal, the first major milestone in China’s three-stage military modernization plan, widely interpreted as readiness to conduct a Taiwan operation. Modernization and reform through organizational restructuring, troop reductions, new combat formations, and advances in information warfare, data dominance, and joint operations are pursued to improve efficiency while preserving centralized Party control.

To meet the 2027 benchmark, the Central Military Commission is seeking a leadership corps thoroughly screened under the new political standards. Party theory holds that ideological wavering undermines combat effectiveness, and the regulations are intended to ensure orders are executed without hesitation or internal resistance. The PLA’s external activities, including peacekeeping, anti-piracy missions in the Gulf of Aden, and disaster relief, function as political signaling rather than neutral participation in globalization.

CCP propaganda uses these missions to frame China as a “responsible great power” and a provider of global stability, countering the “China threat” narrative. Domestically, images of PLA troops in blue helmets reinforce the claim that only under CCP leadership can China achieve national rejuvenation, tying military modernization directly to Party legitimacy.

The result is a Leninist fusion of Party and army, increasingly personalized around Xi Jinping. Unlike Western militaries that serve a constitution or state, the PLA is a Party-army with no separation between command authority and political will.

More...