Saturday, October 31, 2026

The Technate Dictatorship Coming Soon to a Continent Near You

Technocracy 101: The Technate Dictatorship Coming Soon to a Continent Near You


Recently I downloaded and read the original plans of Technocracy Inc. in the Technocracy Study Course (1945).[1] What I found was not a dusty historical curiosity. It was a clear, detailed blueprint for replacing elected government across an entire continent with a permanent technical hierarchy that answers to no one outside its own ranks. The authors stated their contempt for democracy, individual rights, and ordinary political consent. They designed a system in which a small group of appointed experts would measure every unit of energy, distribute every good and service, and leave the public with certificates instead of votes. The structure they described is no longer theoretical. It is presently being assembled under different names with tools the designers could only imagine.


On the first page of The Technocracy Study Course we find their stated goal:

Technocracy finds that the production and distribution of an abundance of physical wealth on a Continental scale for the use of all Continental citizens can only be accomplished by a Continental technological control, a governance of function, a Technate.

In the 1930s, during the Great Depression, scientists, engineers, and technicians organized under Technocracy Inc. produced the Technocracy Study Course. Their message was blunt. The “Price System” of money, markets, debt, and elected politicians could not manage modern industrial society. Technology had made abundance possible, but politics and business produced only waste, scarcity, and chaos. The solution they proposed was a continental Technate covering North America, run entirely by technical experts.

Presently their plan from the 1930s is spreading worldwide and being implemented in regions that can ultimately be linked into a single digital system of control and order. They have systematically assembled the pieces of their design since their inception in the 1930s. Many technocrats of both the past and the present have been members of the Trilateral Commission. Founded by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1973, the Trilateral Commission had the specific purpose of creating a “New International Economic Order,” also known as a New Economic World Order. [2]

To achieve their end goal, they first infiltrate the very governments they intend to dismantle. They then systematically disrupt economies, inflate debt, engineer food and resource shortages, provoke wars, finance rioters, sow division and hatred between races and factions, facilitate the arrival of migrants unwilling to assimilate, and install corrupt politicians. They employ many of the same methods Communists have used to seize power. In fact, the system closely resembles Communism: a small group of self-appointed elite leaders rule over the people, while everyone else receives the same limited income and the leaders live in luxury. The middle class is abolished.

The goal is to destroy public trust in elected representative government so that the Technate can be offered as the solution. This follows the classic Hegelian dialectic. An engineered antithesis of crisis and chaos is set against the existing order, the thesis. The resulting conflict clears the way for the preplanned synthesis of technocratic rule in place of representative government.

The handbook stated that “all philosophic concepts of human equality, democracy, and political economy have upon examination been found totally lacking and unable to contribute any factors of design for a Continental technological control.”






Why the Tehran Summit Is a Game-Changer


Why the Tehran Summit Is a Game-Changer
Pepe Escobar



The ball is entirely on West Asia’s court. The U.S. is not even on the table.

The optics were sensational.

The Saudi Minister of Defense, Prince Khalid, brother of MbS; the Turkey head of intel, Ibrahim Kalin; and the military head of Pakistan, Field Marshal Asim Munir, all three full members of the Mecca Defense Alliance, enter a lavish room in the proverbial Persian palace to greet – or kiss the ring – of the potentate, sorry, secretary of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), Moshen Rezaee, number two of the Iranian power structure right below Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.

This was not the Mecca Defense Alliance ostensibly on parade – representing neo-Ottomans, Arabs and South Asians. This was the Tehran Summit – as defined by the Persians.

Iran had only agreed to hold this ground-breaking summit – actually suggested by Asim Munir during his visit to Tehran last week – outside of the framework of the Mecca deal, and explicitly within the framework of discussing “endogenous regional security.”

So yes, they did discuss Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen, Gulf security and the Strait of Hormuz, in the spirit of reducing the proverbial “regional tensions” and ending the U.S. war against Iran and the Axis of Resistance.

The Tehran Summit may eventually signify the – reluctant or otherwise – acceptance of Iran’s security demands and the final status of the Strait of Hormuz, being elaborated via the Iran-Oman agreement.

It all depends, of course, on what the House of Saud will finally decide. And this decision is directly linked to how Riyadh will solve its deadly clash against Yemen.

Tehran was explicit: we are prepared to mediate and assist in resolving the Yemen dossier; however, it’s up to Riyadh to address – and accept – Ansarallah’s conditions. Otherwise, the – pre-existing – war will keep going on.

It was Dr. Ali Bagheri Kani, the immensely competent Deputy Secretary of the SNSC, who offered the best inside view of what was being discussed at the table.

1.The four nations identified Israel as the main source of regional instability, with Iran as its immediate target and other countries potentially next (italics mine). The other source is the United States. Imagine Prince Khalid agreeing to all of the above.

  1. An agreement on lasting security in West Asia must be built from within, without dependence on foreign powers.
  2. Tehran positioned itself as the central link (italics mine) connecting Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan. Feel free to be gobsmacked.
  3. All four nations agreed to continue talking. Iran will coordinate the next meeting. No date or location yet.

Now add to this already stunning framework a Mohsen Rezaee Unplugged special: he was definitely in a much more cheerful mood than usual.

Take this highlight:

“I feel the presence of a new atmosphere in the region. It has formed thanks to the resistance of the Iranian people and the capability of the armed forces. I have sensed an extremely positive atmosphere in the discussions with these gentlemen.”

More....


Friday, October 30, 2026

'The globalists have launched a coup in Poland': Police move against top court amid 'constitutional crisis'


'The globalists have launched a coup in Poland': Police move against top court amid 'constitutional crisis'



Prime minister waits until president is absent, dispatches ranks of cops to courthouse

Poland, often considered one of the more stable and more conservative nations across the landscape of Europe, sudden has been wracked by what could be an attempted coup.

It was Prime Minister Donald Tusk who waited until President Karol Nawrocki was out of the country, heading to Senegal, when he dispatched police to take over the operations of the nation's top constitutional court, the Constitutional Tribunal.

As of late Friday, Nawrocki was on his way back, having ordered his plane to turn around, and violence was developing at the court.

According to Just the News, "Poland appears to be in a state of constitutional crisis."

COUP UNDERWAY IN POLAND! PM Donald Tusk has just sent police to storm Constitutional Tribunal building in Warsaw in the middle of the night.

Tusk waited until President Karol Nawrocki left the country before ordering the police takeover. Nawrocki was halfway to Senegal when he abruptly turned his plane around and rushed back to Poland to confront the unfolding crisis. The EU, which backs Donald Tusk, has STILL NOT issued a statement on this unprecedented crisis or condemned the attempted coup.

Reports revealed a "de facto power struggle" had erupted.

"For now, the outcome of this confrontation remains uncertain. Judge Anna Korwin-Piotrowska called the police to the grounds of the Constitutional Tribunal, citing a potential threat to the safety of judges and staff. Police did not enter the building, but a significant number of officers have been deployed in the surrounding area. Korwin-Piotrowska suspended Tribunal President Bogdan Święczkowski and his deputy, Bartłomiej Sochański, for one month, temporarily taking charge of the institution herself," reports explained.

The moves amounted to a "coup," critics charged.

The fight has been between the current pro-European government and an opposition party, the Law and Justice organization.

There are accusations politicians have been influencing court rulings.

More...


Media Silent As 130 Christians Slaughtered In 3 Different Countries


Media Silent As 130 Christians Slaughtered In 3 Different Countries
JOSHUA ARNOLD


The past week was one of the most fatal for Christians around the world in recent memory. From Nigeria to Ethiopia to Jordan, gunmen slaughtered more than a hundred Christians. The somber news reminds Christians in America of the urgent need our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ face every day. It also accentuates the stakes in Tuesday's election.

On Friday, gunmen attacked a Christian community in northeastern Nigeria, firing on people as they fled into a river. At least 62 people were killed in the attack, 52 were wounded, and thousands fled their homes. In the past decade, Islamist militants have killed tens of thousands of Christians in Nigeria.

Also on Friday, three unnamed terrorists opened fire at Christians gathered for a funeral outside St. George's Greek Orthodox Church in the village of Hmoud, east of the Dead Sea. Jordanian authorities have suspects in custody, making this the only one of the three attacks where government authorities have acted to protect Christians.

On Saturday, Ethiopian Orthodox Christians in the Oromia state suffered a series of attacks in which more than 60 people were killed, including five children, and 20 houses were burned to the ground. One survivor described it as an ambush, in which the attackers surrounded their victims on all sides.


A local official blamed the attacks on a rebel coalition, Alliance for Survival, which includes the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA). However, according to Christian Emergency Alliance, "surviving witnesses claimed regional authorities collaborated with Islamist militias to carry out the massacre."

All three attacks came the weekend before International Religious Freedom Day (October 27), and also shortly before the U.S. midterm elections.

Fortunately, international religious freedom still finds supporters in both parties -- far more than pro-life or pro-marriage positions. For instance, a bipartisan bill to reauthorize the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) passed the Senate unanimously on September 30.

However, the parties do vary in the intensity of their commitment to international religious freedom.

The Riots In France Expose The Dangerous Fiction That Public Spending And 'Integration' Create A Peaceful Society


The Riots In France Expose The Dangerous Fiction That Public Spending And 'Integration' Create A Peaceful Society



The violence, looting and burning in France over the weekend of October 24th-25th was somewhat less intense and widespread than it had been on the previous weekend, but it was still significant. Demonstrations comprising an estimated 400,000 people took place across France on the Saturday; in Paris the march was confined to the south-eastern edge of the city, and this was followed by violent clashes with police near Porte de Vincennes, about a 45-minute walk from the Place de la Bastille. Water cannon and tear gas were used. Around 500 rioters were estimated to have broken off from the main protest. There were more clashes, as well as bin fires and looting in Marseille, Lyon, Bordeaux, Lille, Toulouse, Nantes, Grenoble, Rennes and several other parts of France. There were around 1,000 arrests nationwide (1,300 by some reports), with 70,000 police having been deployed to the streets, which was a substantial increase on the previous weekend's deployment. Activists have called for further action on October 31st, and it's clear that the sentiment behind the unrest hasn't gone away. The weather on the 31st is forecast to be mild and dry, more similar to that of the 17th than the wetter, colder 24th, so it remains to be seen how much the tensions have been defused, and to what extent the less dedicated were put off by the weather.

There are two competing narratives in the media (mainstream and alternative) about the motivations for the unrest, and indeed the nature of the unrest. On the one hand, this is a 'mostly peaceful' expression of the French people's frustration with public services. It started with teachers and students protesting against the underfunding of schools, and has widened to express a broader discontent with austerity measures and the economy in general. On the other hand, this is a violent ethno-religious-communist uprising trying to bring down the French state and overturn French society.

Legacy media would have you believe the first of these is true, given the footage they're showing and the voiceovers they're providing. Just a brief sojourn into X, Rumble or YouTube will have you come away convinced of the second. Interestingly, the French political Establishment seems to be more aligned with the insurrection view than the peaceful protest view. Less than a week before the first outbreak of violence, Jean-Luc Mélenchon of La France Insoumise('France Unbowed') was calling for the formation of a Sixth Republic of 'popular power'. On October 22nd, addressing the nation, Macron referred to "political and even seditious acts carried out by organized ultra-Left groups whose aim is to bring down the Republic". Laurent Nuñez, France's Interior Minister, referred to "very high levels of violence" and "militants of the ultra-Left movement, of the extreme far Left". Although they're comfortable calling out the black bloc activists that can be seen on the streets, they're ignoring the Islamic slogans and the ethnic composition of many of the perpetrators that the rest of us can see on X.

These two narratives are not mutually exclusive. There is both a mass peaceful demonstration against perceived underinvestment in public services and a violent uprising from an alliance of convenience of anti-Western forces. In this sense, there is an opportunity to use France as an object lesson on this side of the channel. It is a lesson we have been refusing to learn from our own situation, and which has been offered to us grindingly slowly in our own politics and on our streets: the techno-managerial social democratic project rests on a utopian fiction. If we are interested in preserving our civilization, then we really must start paying attention.

In Britain, across almost all of the EU and into the Anglosphere (possibly excepting the United States), the fiction goes something like this: if the state can hoover up just the right amount of money and distribute it correctly through services and benefits, guided by experts and technocrats, eventually we will achieve a settled, prosperous society. The system is imperfect, but perfectible. All that it needs is just the last tax increase, the ideal budget, or a carefully planned management structure, and all will be well. It's just over the horizon, but the direction of travel is the right one. It must be, because that's how we planned it. In the meantime, all of this will be improved by importing human capital from far-flung parts of the world. Since culture and tribalism are essentially artificial, this will be a success as soon as we achieve something called integration.

Many reading this will doubtless already have concluded that this is indeed a dangerous fiction. The interesting thing is that our political, media and institutional class don't seem to be able to look across the channel and see the urgent evidence of the delusion.

If it really were a case of the right amount of resources being allocated through the state, then surely France would be closer to nirvana than we are in Britain? French public sector spending accounts for around 57% of the country's GDP. Social spending - that is, cash benefits and in-kind services for old age, health, family, unemployment, incapacity, housing, and so on - accounts for fully 30% of GDP. This compares to 49.4% and 28% state expenditure and social spending respectively for Germany, 47% and 23% for the UK and 37% and 19.8% for the US. In Communist China, the state accounts for around 33% of GDP and 10-13% is spent on social benefits. In the USSR in 1988, something like 51% of spending was by the state; roughly 15-20% was social spending (these last two are necessarily estimates, because the data are neither easily available nor reliable).