Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Earthquakes Rattle Mexico-California Border and Southern California on Election Day


Earthquakes Rattle Mexico-California Border and Southern California on Election Day

Southern  residents were hit with a series of quakes on Election Day.

At least two notable earthquakes rattled the Mexico side of the California-Mexico border and Southern California on Tuesday.

A preliminary magnitude 5.3 earthquake struck Baja California at 10:27 on Tuesday morning. The quake was later downgraded to a 4.7.

Shaking was felt in Mexicali and across parts of Southern California.

One minute later a smaller quake struck in the high desert near the Nevada border.

A magnitude 3.6 quake struck at 10:28 am near Sandy Valley, northeast of Riverside.

According to Fox 5 San Diego, a series of small quakes struck the same region on Monday.

“The quakes happened near the Imperial Fault Zone, an area of geological faults in Imperial County and the adjacent parts of Baja California, that have had previous earthquakes above magnitude 6 and 7,” Fox 5 San Diego reported.


Window for Iran strike nears as fears of a fatal miscalculation grow


Window for Iran strike nears as fears of a fatal miscalculation grow


As polls open in the US midterm elections on Tuesday, the window of opportunity for joint American-Israeli military action against Iran is drawing closer. Senior Israeli security officials believe such an operation is necessary in light of what Israel describes as "extreme measures" taken by the Iranians recently, although the precise nature of those measures remains a matter of speculation.


Israel's security leadership is convinced that recent developments have made military action unavoidable in the foreseeable future. The ultimate decision, however, rests with US President Donald Trump, who is known for his efforts to keep adversaries guessing. One evening, he threatens to destroy Iranian civilization; by the following morning, he is talking about progress in negotiations.

Meanwhile, Qatar is engaged in intensive diplomatic efforts to mediate between the sides and avert an attack. According to published reports, Qatar's new proposal includes several confidence-building measures designed to give both sides a way to back down without losing face.

A narrow window of opportunity and the Iranian threat

The outcome of the US midterm elections will also influence when a military campaign might begin, should one be launched. If early forecasts prove accurate and Trump loses control of both houses of Congress, he will have roughly two months before the newly elected Congress takes office, during which the current Congress will remain in session.

That means the political window of opportunity for an operation is unlikely to remain open for long. It is worth remembering, however, that Trump is expected to visit China in a few days, and it is doubtful he would want to arrive there with a war raging.

In any event, the US has once again reinforced its military presence in the Middle East in recent days, while the Israel Defense Forces has also raised its alert level and stepped up preparations for what may lie ahead.


The Iranians' awareness of these preparations could influence their willingness to negotiate. Still, it is doubtful that Tehran will abandon its core positions or its demands for an end to the blockade, the lifting of sanctions and a cessation of hostilities.

Washington and Jerusalem can draw up plans and set timetables that suit their interests, but they cannot afford to overlook Iran itself, which has already been caught off guard twice, in June 2025 and March 2026. Having learned from those experiences, the Iranians may decide to turn the tables and launch a preemptive strike, hoping to limit the damage they would suffer and perhaps even secure gains of their own.

Israeli security officials use the term "miscalculation" to describe the danger of a mistaken judgment that could trigger a wider escalation. That concern has prompted Israel to place its air defense systems on particularly high alert.

The real question is not when another military campaign might begin, but what its objectives would be and what it could accomplish that the previous two campaigns, Operation Rising Lion and Operation Roaring Lion, failed to achieve.

Beyond eliminating immediate threats and disrupting Iran's efforts to rebuild and strengthen its military capabilities, Israeli officials are discussing the need to bring down the Iranian regime.

Yet no one can guarantee such an outcome. Regime change has eluded Israel so far, even if the next operation is indeed "different" in nature and scope, as officials suggest. It could potentially include strikes on Iran's national infrastructure.

Another complication is that Israel and the US have different objectives for the campaign. While Israel is seeking to topple the Iranian regime, Washington would be prepared to settle for a better agreement that curbs Iran's nuclear program and ends Tehran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

The two countries also appear to differ over how long an operation should last. Trump has spoken of a campaign lasting only a few days, but the Iranians have already made clear that they will not allow another round of fighting to end quickly.

All of this must be considered alongside Israel's political turmoil and concerns among some that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could try to use a military operation to shape the domestic political landscape and prevent opposition leaders from forming a coalition with the support of Arab parties.

That said, credit is due to IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, who is deeply familiar with the intelligence picture and will know whether military action against Iran is genuinely necessary at this point.

As noted, without revealing too much, the Iranians are far from standing still. Based on conversations with several senior Israeli security officials, it is by no means certain that avoiding military action in the foreseeable future would serve Israel's interests.

Ebola kills over 5,300 in fastest-growing outbreak on record


Ebola kills over 5,300 in fastest-growing outbreak on record
Marta Iraola Iribarren


Africa's latest Ebola outbreak has killed nearly 5,400 people, the vast majority of them in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), according to the continent's top health agency.

Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) told the AFP on Monday that the outbreak, which has spread to other countries on the continent, has killed 5,376 people – 5,372 in the DRC and two each in Kenya and Uganda.

The outbreak, which began in the DRC in May, has infected more than 10,000 people, with an over 50% fatality rate, according to the country's latest datafrom 31 October, making it the fastest-growing and most widespread Ebola epidemic on record.

Neighbouring Uganda recorded 20 cases, almost all involving people who had travelled from the DRC, before being declared Ebola-free in August.

In October, Kenya recorded nine infections, marking the first time the country had reported an Ebola case.

That same month, Nigeria, Africa's most populous country, reported an Ebola case involving a 42-year-old Swiss woman whose husband works at his country's embassy in Abuja. The couple had travelled to Uganda before returning home.

The outbreak is caused by the rare Bundibugyo virus, which has no approved vaccine or treatment. The virus is transmitted through contact with bodily fluids and causes haemorrhagic fever.

In recent weeks, clinical trials of the Ervebo vaccine, which has proved effective against the more common Zaire strain of Ebola, have begun.


Trump says US will halt all military aid to Israel, $4 billion annually, by end of 2026


Trump suggests ending US aid will refute criticism that Israel gets more than any other country


Explaining his support for ending military aid to Israel, US President Donald Trump suggests he doesn’t want to give ammunition to critics who knock Washington for giving more to the Jewish state than any other country.

“Why should we suffer the slings from lunatics like an El-Sayed when they don’t need it,” Trump tells Fox News.

“It’s a bad talking point. Because then you’d say, ‘Why don’t we give everyone $4 billion? Israel is our number one. We give them more than anybody else,’” he continues.

Trump insists that Israel doesn’t need the money and that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was the one who raised the idea — even though the premier has said he proposed ending aid gradually, not ceasing it immediately.

Moreover, the current aid package is not supposed to expire until the fall of 2028, not this year as Trump claimed.

“If they did need it, I would say keep it going. But we reached an agreement on that,” Trump says

“And can I be honest with you, [Netanyahu] brought it up. He said, ‘I think it would be appropriate if we do not receive aid.’ Because he understands that this is one of the points of contention,” Trump says, appearing to acknowledge how unpopular aid to Israel has become in the US.

“Israel has been a great ally — much more reliable than most,” Trump notes.


Finance Ministry officials said taken off guard by Trump announcing imminent halt to military aid

Lazar Berman

Officials in the Finance Ministry say they were surprised by US President Donald Trump’s announcement that military aid to Israel would cease by the end of the year, according to Hebrew media reports.

“No formal document was submitted from the Prime Minister’s Office regarding the end of aid,” says an official, according to the Walla news site. “The ministry was aware of the intention to end it, but was surprised by the intention to do so immediately.”

The Ynet outlet quotes an unnamed senior Israeli financial official as saying the announcement has grave consequences for the economy: “Giving up two years of aid is $8 billion. Where will we get this? It’s clear — from citizens’ taxes.”

The Prime Minister’s Office is expected to comment on Trump’s statement soon.


AI Cyberattacks Could Literally Turn Off Our Electricity And Cause An Extended Blackout At Any Moment


AI Cyberattacks Could Literally Turn Off Our Electricity And Cause An Extended Blackout At Any Moment
Michael Snyder


We live at a time when we are facing a relentless wave of AI cyberattacks, and they are becoming insanely sophisticated. On Monday, refrigeration units in supermarkets all over Europe were successfully attacked. But I am not going to talk about that today. In this article, I am going to talk about the sort of AI cyberattack that could turn off your electricity for an extended period of time. This is not a theoretical threat. Hackers have been repeatedly attacking Internet-exposed programmable logic controllers in recent months, and a successful attack could potentially plunge a large portion of the country into darkness right in the middle of the winter.

Evaluating these types of threats is what GovAI does.

It is literally their job.

So perhaps we should pay attention when GovAI tells us that a single AI cyberattack “could cut off power to 100 million people and cost the economy $100 billion”…

GovAI specializes in examining AI threats and risk management. It claims its mission is to help governments and industries to “navigate the transition to a world with advanced AI.” Recently, it has forecast what would happen if AI shut down part of the US electrical grid. Such a cyberattack could cut off power to 100 million people and cost the economy $100 billion. The financial forecast assumes a weeklong blackout.

Because our system is decentralized, a single cyberattack would not cause a nationwide blackout.

But even a successful attack on one region could create all sorts of chaos…

The crippling of the grid could happen in two ways. One such attack could cause a physical breakdown. Another could target hundreds of other weak spots in the system. The analysis adds that smaller attacks are more likely. “The $100 billion grid cyberattack scenario remains useful for understanding the broader range of cyber risks to critical infrastructure, including those at lower damage thresholds.” The authors add that attacking one region would be easier and more likely than a nationwide attack. This makes sense. The US electricity infrastructure is controlled in several huge regions.

It was never a good idea to connect our energy infrastructure to the Internet.

Now we are extremely vulnerable, and there are no easy solutions.

In August, five alphabet agencies issued a very ominous warning.

They announced that hackers have been conducting cyberattacks on Siemens S7 series industrial controllers…

On Aug. 19, the NSA, CISA, FBI, Department of Energy and EPA warned that cyber actors are targeting U.S.-based Siemens S7 series industrial controllers with AI-generated exploitation scripts. These controllers help operate real machinery. The sectors at risk include power, water, manufacturing, chemicals and food production.

A successful attack would not merely steal information. Federal officials warn it could interrupt industrial processes, damage equipment or create safety problems. The government calls this an active threat, not a theoretical one.

If an AI cyberattack allows hackers to take control of Internet-exposed programmable logic controllers, they could potentially do a tremendous amount of damage.

Apparently hackers affiliated with Iran have been targeting Internet-exposed PLCs “since at least April 2026”…

Iran-affiliated threat actors have been targeting internet-exposed PLCs across multiple critical infrastructure sectors, including energy, since at least April 2026. The attacks involve unauthorized access to exposed industrial devices, with some incidents later resulting in changes to controller project files and operator display data. While widespread outages have not been reported, the campaign highlights the risk posed by publicly accessible operational technology and the potential for follow-on disruptive activity.

Hackers affiliated with Iran have also been targeting power facilities in Europe, and in July they were able to successfully shut down one facility for a period of four days…

A small U.K. power facility was forced to shut down for four days in July after a cyberattack linked to Iran-nexus hackers, government officials have confirmed.

Government officials said the attack, first reported by The Telegraph, was limited to one facility, which they did not identify, and noted there was no wider impact to the country’s energy grid.

“This story refers to an incident impacting a small-scale energy generator, and at no point was there a risk to the wider energy system,” a government spokesperson told Cybersecurity Dive.

The next month, hackers affiliated with Iran were able to cause “limited disruption” for water systems in a number of U.S. states…

Iranian-linked hackers targeted U.S. water systems across at least a dozen states, with more than 100 facilities reportedly affected. The IRGC-linked CyberAv3ngers group claimed responsibility, though the U.S. government has not publicly attributed the campaign. The attacks caused limited disruption, including reduced water pressure and a boil-water advisory in Georgia, but normal water access and drinking water quality were not broadly affected.

Needless to say, Iranian hackers are not the best hackers in the world.

Not even close.

Russian hackers are far more sophisticated, and they apparently targeted Poland’s power grid in December 2025…

The Russian state-sponsored APT named Sandworm was behind the December 2025 cyberattack targeting Poland’s power grid, cybersecurity firm ESET reports.

Poland’s energy infrastructure, including two combined heat and power (CHP) plants and a renewable energy management system, was targeted by hackers on December 29-30, and Polish officials blamed Russia for the assault.

Said to have been the largest cyberattack against Poland in years, the December 2025 incident was thwarted before it could cause a blackout or compromise critical infrastructure, the country’s officials said earlier this month.


Offensive AI cyberthreats are only going to become more powerful over time, and so this is a crisis that is not going to go away.

Today, we are talking about freezers and refrigerators going haywire all over Europe…

Apparent cyberattacks targeted supermarket freezers and fridges in Sweden, Belgium, Luxembourg and Estonia on Monday, causing some food spoilage.

This is not the first time such an issue has occurred. Last month, hackers targeted hundreds of supermarket chains across France, forcing the temperature of their fridges and freezers up to 122 degrees Fahrenheit and causing fires and food spoilage.

Monday’s apparent cyberattack impacted a number of supermarket chains. ICA Group supermarket chain spokesperson Gustaf Nilsson told news agency TT that “a limited number” of stores were affected overnight by an incident that affected refrigeration and freezing systems, The Associated Press reported in Sweden.

Our military leaders are starting to wake up to the threat posed by AI cyberattacks, and that is why they have initiated “Project FORTRESS”…

The announcement of the Pentagon’s FORTRESS initiative has drawn attention to the U.S. military’s strategies aiming to bolster its energy resilience amid concerns over grid reliability, supply-chain disruptions and other potential threats.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth unveiled the Federal Operations for Resilience, Troop Resources, Energy, Supply, and Survivability (FORTRESS) initiative on September 30 in a memo, dubbing it “the nation’s insurance policy” to ensure the U.S. would still be able to obtain the materials it needs and carry out operations if traditional supply chains were cut off.

The Pentagon’s focus on resilience mirrors a broader emphasis on preparedness seen in other countries. Last week in Britain, officials encouraged households to keep basic emergency supplies available for short-term disruptions such as storms, infrastructure failures and power outages, as part of its Be Ready campaign.