The Great Deception: How Multipolarity, BRICS, and the Russia-China-Islam Axis Are Selling the Same Old World Order

The Great Deception: How Multipolarity, BRICS, and the Russia-China-Islam Axis Are Selling the Same Old World Order

BP

Millions of people are fed up with the Western oligarchs who run the current system. They see endless wars, financial exploitation, and cultural decay pushed by banks, corporations, and unaccountable global institutions. So when voices promise a new multipolar world led by Russia, China, BRICS, and their allies, many leap at the chance. They believe this is the real resistance. They are being duped. The multipolar world order is not the enemy of the New World Order. It is the next phase of the same project. What looks like a heroic revolt by the East and the Global South is actually regional bloc-building that funnels nations into a centralized global system. New players arrive. The game stays the same.

The Multipolar Illusion

James Corbett calls it “multipolaritis.” In his April 2026 report, he warns that people excited about BRICS nations sticking it to the West are missing the bigger picture. He writes: “Do you think the BRICS nations are going to save us from the New World Order? Then you might be suffering from multipolaritis.” Corbett points out that the term BRIC was invented by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O’Neill in 2001. Far from being an organic opposition, it emerged from Western financial circles. Putin’s Eurasian Economic Union was explicitly modeled on the European Union, complete with similar bureaucratic structures. These are not anti-globalist projects. They are parallel integration schemes designed to create regional superstates as steppingstones to broader control. [1]

The Geopolitics and Empire March 23, 2026 article Multipolarity As World Government 3.0 & Its Pied Pipers drives the point home even harder. It calls promoters of multipolarity the new “pied pipers.” They tap into legitimate anger from centuries of Western exploitation. Yet the solution they offer simply merges East and West under the same transnational elite. There are no good guys among the major powers. Every major nation is run by its own oligarchic cartel. [2]

This deception gains extra force through another deeper ideological fusion. An emerging alliance between communism (in its modern Russian and Chinese forms), radical Islam, and Russian Eastern Orthodox religion is being promoted by so called philosopher Alexander Dugin. His Eurasian movement frames Russia as the defender of traditional civilizations against Western liberal decay. It calls for a multipolar world where great “civilizational states” stand together. Some of the most famous podcasters with millions of viewers worldwide, Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones, have presented Alexander Dugin (AKA Putin’s brain) as a great philosopher who has a solution to save the world from the evil western oligarchy. On the surface, this sounds appealing to anyone who rejects globalist wokeness and endless NATO expansion. In practice, it pulls Orthodox Russia, communist China, and Islamic states into coordinated institutions like BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. These structures do not dismantle supranational control. They expand and rebrand it.

They Operate Inside the Same Global Systems

Look at the concrete evidence. Russia and China repeatedly pledge support for the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In their February 2022 joint statement, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin called for accelerated implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda. They pushed cooperation on poverty reduction, vaccines, climate change, green development, digital economy, and infrastructure. China’s Global Development Initiative is explicitly framed as a way to advance the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. [3]

BRICS countries as a group have repeatedly committed to the 2030 Agenda and work through the UN framework. Islamic member states in BRICS, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, participate in the same sustainable development programs, climate initiatives, and global governance forums. They do not reject the system. They help shape and legitimize it from within. [4]  [5]

China leads the world in its digital yuan central bank digital currency (CBDC) with massive pilots. Russia develops its digital ruble. Both explore cross-border links, often through platforms tied to broader international efforts. Many Islamic countries, especially in the Gulf, actively test and adopt similar digital payment systems. These tools enable tracking, programmable money, and greater financial surveillance. 

They align with the same “digital transformation” and “sustainable finance” agendas promoted by the World Economic Forum and UN bodies. All sides engage with the World Health Organization on pandemic preparedness, digital health certificates, and global health governance. They attend the same climate summits pushing net-zero targets, carbon tracking, and sustainable development policies that expand government and technocratic oversight. [6]

People who hate the current oligarchs convince themselves that Putin, Xi, and their partners will break the system. In reality, these leaders want a better seat at the global table, not to burn the table down. The average person in Russia, China, or Iran remains under tight control by their own domestic elites. Ordinary citizens gain nothing from swapping one set of masters for another.

This is the hard truth. If you despise the Western financial oligarchy and its institutions, do not fall for the Eastern or multipolar alternative. It is the same roadmap with new drivers. The goal remains a managed, multi-regional global governance system where real power stays with a small international class while populations are divided into manageable civilizational blocs

MORE....

“The Grid Is Dying”: Secret Energy Warnings During Extreme Heat Waves Spark Fears of Mass Blackouts Across Europe and North America

“The Grid Is Dying”: Secret Energy Warnings During Extreme Heat Waves Spark Fears of Mass Blackouts Across Europe and North America

Madge Waggy

The modern electrical grid is often imagined as permanent infrastructure, something mechanically stable and immune to emotional interpretation. In reality, it behaves more like a nervous system stretched across enormous geographic distances, balancing itself continuously against fluctuations in demand, climate pressure, fuel availability, and technical stability. Under normal conditions, these systems operate with astonishing precision. Under prolonged thermal stress, however, the entire architecture begins behaving unpredictably. Transmission lines physically expand in extreme heat and lose efficiency. Transformers overheat faster. Backup reserves shrink rapidly. Power plants struggle to maintain stable output while simultaneously attempting to satisfy unprecedented demand spikes. The frightening paradox is brutally simple: modern civilization requires more electricity precisely when electrical infrastructure becomes less capable of producing and distributing it safely.

For decades, infrastructure analysts quietly warned that many Western energy systems were aging into obsolescence faster than governments were modernizing them. Large sections of the electrical architecture still supporting advanced economies today were originally developed during the industrial optimism of the 1960s and 1970s, a period when cities consumed only a fraction of the energy modern populations now require. Few engineers at the time imagined a future where entire continents would depend on constant cooling merely to remain habitable during summer months. Fewer still imagined a climate system capable of generating weeks of sustained thermal pressure across multiple countries simultaneously.

The illusion of stability survived largely because the grid continued functioning well enough for ordinary life to proceed uninterrupted. Politicians repeatedly delayed large-scale modernization because electrical maintenance lacks the dramatic visibility of military projects, economic campaigns, or ideological battles. Repairing transmission corridors does not inspire voters. Expanding transformer capacity rarely dominates election cycles. Consequently, many governments postponed critical upgrades year after year while urban populations expanded, digital infrastructure multiplied, and climate conditions deteriorated.

What emerged from those decades of delay is one of the most dangerous contradictions in modern civilization: humanity created societies entirely dependent on uninterrupted electricity while simultaneously neglecting the physical systems responsible for delivering it.

The consequences of that contradiction become terrifyingly visible during extreme heat.

Recent summers exposed how psychologically fragile technologically advanced societies have become once energy insecurity enters public consciousness. At first, blackout warnings appear harmless. Citizens treat them like temporary inconveniences. Social media fills with jokes about broken air conditioners and overloaded grids. But as temperatures remain extreme and emergency alerts intensify, collective behavior begins changing in subtle ways. Grocery stores become crowded. Portable generators disappear from shelves. Fuel stations experience unusual demand spikes. Rumors spread faster than official statements. People start charging every electronic device they own, as though instinctively sensing that modern comfort is balancing itself on something dangerously unstable.

This psychological transition fascinates sociologists and emergency planners alike because it reveals how profoundly civilization has fused emotional security with electrical continuity. Electricity no longer feels like infrastructure to the average person. It feels existential. It powers communication, cooling, transportation, finance, medicine, food distribution, surveillance, entertainment, and increasingly even social identity itself. Remove electricity from a major city for long enough and modern society begins experiencing something disturbingly similar to collective withdrawal.

Emergency psychologists studying prolonged outages sometimes describe a phenomenon unofficially referred to as “urban derealization,” a condition where familiar environments begin feeling psychologically hostile once technological systems disappear. During major blackouts, cities undergo a rapid sensory mutation. Elevators stop. Screens vanish. Refrigeration systems fail. Ventilation disappears. Entire skylines lose their electrical glow and transform into black geometric masses hanging against overheated skies.

More....

Cars Are Fast Becoming Dystopian Prison Pods…

Cars Are Fast Becoming Dystopian Prison Pods…

Steve Watson

The surveillance state has found its newest frontier: your car’s dashboard. What used to be a symbol of American freedom and independence is rapidly morphing into a high-tech cage that watches your every move and can override your decisions at will.

In a widely shared post on X, users detailed complaints pouring in about Subaru’s upgraded AI ‘EyeSight’ system now featured on the latest models.

Drivers report the system pouncing on brief glances away from the road – while Biden-era federal mandates prepare to make this level of surveillance mandatory in every new vehicle by 2027.

As the video highlights, even a momentary glance to change a song or take in the scenery triggers relentless alerts. The technology doesn’t stop there.

Its new Emergency Stop Assist with Safe Lane Selection feature can detect what it calls an “unresponsive” driver, issue escalating warnings through sounds and steering wheel vibrations, and then take full control: automatically braking, slowing the vehicle, steering it to the shoulder, and activating hazard lights.

This isn’t some optional gimmick. It’s being rolled out as standard “safety” tech, but drivers are calling it exactly what it feels like – an overbearing electronic babysitter that treats competent adults like distracted children.

It serves as a chilling preview of where the entire auto industry is headed under government pressure.

This kind of intrusive monitoring is precisely the tool a police state would dream of to exert total control over personal movement. If authorities gain deeper integration with these systems, they could effectively decide when, where, and if you get to drive at all.

The Subaru rollout is just the latest flashpoint in a broader push toward vehicle surveillance that goes far beyond basic safety. A federal mandate buried in the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act requires all new passenger vehicles sold in the U.S. to include advanced impaired-driving prevention technology starting with 2027 models.

As detailed in reporting from the New York Post, this means infrared cameras and sensors constantly monitoring eyes, faces, head position, and behavior to detect distraction, drowsiness, or impairment – with the power to prevent the car from starting or limit its operation. https://nypost.com/2026/04/30/us-news/sinister-in-car-spy-tech-that-can…

Automakers are already patenting and deploying even more aggressive systems, including biometric scans that analyze everything from your gait to your heart rate. Privacy advocates warn the data won’t stay in the car – it could flow to insurers for risk scoring, law enforcement, or worse.

As we also recently highlighted, dystopian technology including AI face scanning, lip reading and emotion monitoring is being deployed in vehicles, as well as cross-checks for drivers against police databases before even allowing the vehicle to move.

And authorities are already signaling their eagerness to weaponize these tools for broader travel restrictions. In Massachusetts, Democrats advanced a bill aimed at reducing statewide vehicle miles traveled to meet climate targets, pushing policies that critics say amount to limiting how far people can drive in their own cars.

X users are reacting with the outrage this deserves, blasting the tech as the thin end of the wedge for total control:

Globalist climate agendas, big government overreach, and corporate-government collusion are converging to strip away the last vestiges of personal autonomy on the open road. What starts as “safety features” and “environmental goals” ends with your car deciding whether you’re allowed to leave your driveway.

Americans have always valued the freedom to get behind the wheel and go where they please without Big Brother riding shotgun.

These prison pods represent the opposite vision – one of constant monitoring, automated intervention, and restricted mobility.

How Hamas’s internal cracks are becoming impossible for Gazans to ignore - opinion

How Hamas’s internal cracks are becoming impossible for Gazans to ignore - opinion

MOHAMMED ALTOOLL

In the Middle East, defining moments are not always measured by the size of an explosion or the number of casualties. Sometimes, they are measured by the reaction that follows. After Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz confirmed the killing of Haddad, one of Hamas’s most prominent military council commanders, what drew attention inside Gaza was not only the assassination itself, but the silence that followed it.

In previous years, funerals of senior Hamas commandersoften turned into massive public displays of loyalty and defiance. Streets would fill with crowds, chants, and military symbolism. This time, however, many Gazans noticed something different. The turnout appeared smaller, public enthusiasm seemed weaker, and social media reactions revealed emotions rarely expressed so openly before: exhaustion, indifference, and in some cases, even schadenfreude.

These reactions did not come only from Hamas’s political opponents or from civilians devastated by years of war and economic collapse. Some also appeared to come from individuals previously associated with Hamas’s own social environment. Many revived old conversations about internal rivalries, repression, and the atmosphere of fear that has shaped life in Gaza for years.

In a politically closed and deeply conservative society like Gaza, shifts in public opinion are not always expressed through demonstrations or polls. Sometimes they are reflected in whispers, in silence, or in what people choose not to do. For many Gazans, the relatively weak public response to Haddad’s funeral carried a deeper political and social message.

Questions are now growing inside Gaza about whether Hamas still possesses the same solid popular base that once gave the movement its legitimacy after taking control of the Strip in 2007. After years of war, blockade, displacement, and economic collapse, many Gazans no longer view political factions through the same ideological lens. Priorities have changed. People increasingly want electricity, safety, freedom of movement, jobs, and education more than revolutionary slogans.

At the same time, Hamas recently allowed Fatah to hold its eighth conference inside Gaza under the protection of Hamas-controlled police forces, while statements attributed to Yasser Abbas, son of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, accused Hamas of carrying out a “military coup” against the Palestinian Authority. For many Gazans, this contradiction raised difficult questions. How can Fatah continue to describe Hamas as its political and military rival while simultaneously coordinating with it on the ground in Gaza?

For residents who lived through the violent 2007 Hamas-Fatah split, such scenes reinforce the growing belief that Palestinian division has evolved into a closed political system in which both sides reproduce their own power structures while ordinary civilians remain excluded from meaningful political representation.

On social media, many Gazans criticized Fatah’s eighth conference as yet another recycling of aging leadership figures incapable of offering a realistic vision for Gaza’s future or involving younger generations in political decision-making. Yet frustration is no longer directed at Fatah alone. Hamas itself is facing what may be the deepest crisis of public trust since it seized control of Gaza nearly two decades ago.

More...

Communist Dictator Miguel Díaz-Canel Threatens ‘Bloodbath’ Against America as Cuba Stockpiles 300+ Russian and Iranian Drones

Communist Dictator Miguel Díaz-Canel Threatens ‘Bloodbath’ Against America as Cuba Stockpiles 300+ Russian and Iranian Drones in Desperate Panic Under Trump’s Crushing Pressure

Jim Hᴏft

Cuba’s blood-soaked communist dictator Miguel Díaz-Canel lashed out Monday, warning that any U.S. military action against his crumbling island prison would unleash a “bloodbath with incalculable consequences.”

The thug-in-chief, who has spent years crushing dissent, jailing protesters, and turning Cuba into a starving socialist dumpster fire, took to X to spew his hollow threats after explosive reports revealed his regime has been quietly amassing over 300 military drones from Russia and Iran.

Just days ago, reports emerged that the Trump administration was weighing aggressive options amid growing national security concerns surrounding Cuba, while CIA Director John Ratcliffe reportedly warned Havana that it could no longer function as a “safe haven for adversaries.”

According to classified intelligence cited by Axios, Cuban officials have acquired more than 300 military drones of varying capability since 2023 and have held discussions about how such systems could be used in the event of hostilities with Washington.

Potential targets discussed include the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, American military vessels, and possibly even locations in southern Florida, including Key West.

Diaz-Canel wrote on X:

“The threats of military aggression against Cuba from the world’s greatest power are well-known.

The threat itself already constitutes an international crime. If it were to materialize, it would trigger a bloodbath with incalculable consequences, plus the destructive impact on regional peace and stability.

Cuba poses no threat, nor does it have aggressive plans or intentions against any country. It has none against the U.S., nor has it ever had any—something the government of that nation knows full well, particularly its defense and national security agencies.

Cuba, which already endures a multidimensional aggression from the U.S., does have the absolute and legitimate right to defend itself against a military onslaught. Yet that cannot be wielded, either logically or honestly, as an excuse for imposing war on the noble Cuban people.”

This isn’t the first time the desperate Cuban dictator has run his mouth against President Trump’s no-nonsense America First agenda.

As The Gateway Pundit has reported repeatedly, Díaz-Canel has been sweating bullets since Trump returned to the White House and ramped up sanctions, exposing the regime’s weakness and accelerating its inevitable collapse.

Back in January, the communist strongman directly threatened America and vowed to “resist” Trump’s pressure. In March, he ranted about preparing to repel a U.S. invasion.

And just last month, Trump himself declared that the “great strength” of the American military would soon bring a “new dawn for Cuba.”