Thursday, March 19, 2026

Trump Eyes Boots On The Ground Along Hormuz Shoreline


Trump Eyes Boots On The Ground Along Hormuz Shoreline
 TYLER DURDEN


Several reports this week into Thursday say the Trump administration is quietly weighing a major escalation - potentially deploying thousands of additional troops to the Middle East as the White House struggles to map out an end game in Iran, according to Reuters.

Interestingly, the Reuters report doesn't include the phrase that Trump strongly campaigned against: 'boots on the ground'. Instead the report framed things more simply as "US weighs military reinforcements as Iran war enters possible new phase."

Are the American people being slowly prepped for ground action? Officials say the buildup would give Trump "additional options" with the war having dragged far past the initial pledges of 'days' or some kind of brief in and out Venezuela-style op.

Driving all of this is of course control of the Strait of Hormuz, given there are few options for guarantee tanker traffic through the chokepoint. After the Pentagon bombed some 90 military sites on Iran's oil export hub Kharg Island last weekend, the US is running up against the obvious limitations of a purely air and naval campaign.

In a scenario that screams escalation, discussions now include deploying US troops directly to Iran's coastline to secure the passage. The even more aggressive option is potential ground operations targeting Kharg - again given it is the nerve center handling roughly 90% of Iran’s oil exports.

There's also been talk of some kind of special forces raid to secure Iran's enriched uranium and key nuclear infrastructure, which some military analysts consider to be essentially a 'suicidal' mission.

One US official admitted to Reuters that putting troops around the Hormuz or on Kharg Island would be "very risky" - given Iran’s ability to hammer the island with missiles and drones.

There's also the reality of Iran's shoreline itself. It is jagged, mountainous, rocky, and narrow at points - giving the Iranian side a defensive advantage, also for hit and run style guerilla tactics.

As a reminder of some important commentary we featured earlier, most Americans have little understanding or concept of Iran's size in terms of geography or population. The ethno-religious make-up of the sprawling Mideast/West Asian nation is also deeply important.

Suffice it to say, Iran's population is more than double (over 90 million people) that of neighboring Iraq's. Iran is also the size of almost half the European continent. All of this is crucial for attempting to visualize what American military escalation there might mean, given the Trump White House has clearly not ruled out American boots on the ground amid the unfolding 'Operation Epic Fury'. And we are only now approaching three weeks in.

The Silence In The Pulpit: When Pastors Stop Preaching On Bible Prophecy


The Silence In The Pulpit: When Pastors Stop Preaching On Bible Prophecy
 JOE HAWKINS


Across much of the modern church landscape, a curious silence has settled over the pulpit. It is not the silence of reverence or reflection, but the silence of avoidance. Entire portions of Scripture--especially those dealing with the future--are quietly bypassed, rarely explained, and almost never preached through in a systematic way. Topics such as the Rapture, the Tribulation, the Antichrist, the coming Kingdom, and the return of Christ have gradually disappeared from many Sunday morning sermons.

For generations of believers, this silence would have been almost unimaginable. Earlier pastors regularly preached through prophetic books such as Daniel, Ezekiel, Zechariah, and Revelation. Entire sermon series were devoted to the signs of the times and the promises of Christ's return. The expectation of the Lord's coming was not viewed as fringe theology--it was central to the Christian hope.

Today, however, many pastors avoid prophecy altogether.

In some churches, prophetic passages are simply skipped when preaching through books of the Bible. In others, the subject is acknowledged but treated as too controversial or too complicated to address publicly. Still others dismiss prophecy as speculative theology that distracts from what they consider more "practical" aspects of Christian living.

The result is that many believers now sit in churches for years without ever hearing a sermon on the prophetic portions of Scripture.

This shift is significant because prophecy is not a minor theme in the Bible. Scholars often note that roughly one-third of Scripture contains prophetic material. From Genesis to Revelation, God repeatedly reveals His plans for the future. The biblical story moves toward a climactic conclusion in which Christ returns, judges evil, and establishes His kingdom.

Yet in many congregations, this massive portion of God's Word remains largely unexplored.

The silence surrounding prophecy raises an important question: why are so many pastors no longer preaching it?

The answer reveals much about the current condition of the church--and perhaps something about the spiritual climate of the last days.

Why Many Pastors Avoid Prophecy

If such a large portion of the Bible deals with prophecy, why do so many pastors avoid it? The reasons vary from church to church, but several common factors appear repeatedly.

One of the most significant is the fear of controversy. Bible prophecy often involves interpretations that differ among sincere believers. Discussions about the timing of the Rapture, the nature of the Millennium, or the identity of prophetic figures like the Antichrist can quickly become heated debates. In an age when many churches are striving to maintain unity and avoid conflict, some pastors conclude that it is safer simply to avoid the subject altogether.

Rather than risk division within the congregation, they choose to focus on topics they believe will be less controversial.

Another factor is the perceived complexity of prophecy. Books like Daniel, Ezekiel, and Revelation contain symbolic imagery, apocalyptic language, and prophetic timelines that can appear intimidating to both pastors and congregations. Some church leaders feel ill-equipped to explain these passages confidently, especially if they did not receive strong training in prophetic interpretation during their theological education.

As a result, they often default to preaching from passages that feel more straightforward and easier to apply.

There is also the influence of modern church-growth philosophy. In many ministry circles, pastors are encouraged to focus on messages that are immediately practical and relevant to everyday life. Sermons on relationships, finances, emotional health, and personal fulfillment are often seen as more accessible to modern audiences.

Prophecy, by contrast, is sometimes viewed as abstract or speculative--something that may interest theologians but not the average church attendee.

When pastors adopt this mindset, prophetic teaching can gradually disappear from the preaching calendar.

Cultural pressure also plays a role. In an increasingly skeptical and secular society, some church leaders worry that preaching about the end times will make Christianity appear extreme or sensational. Discussions about divine judgment, global upheaval, and the rise of the Antichrist do not fit comfortably within a culture that prefers optimism and stability.

To avoid appearing alarmist or out of touch, some pastors simply choose not to address these topics at all.

Over time, these factors combine to create an environment where prophecy is quietly sidelined. It is not necessarily rejected outright--it is simply ignored. Entire books of Scripture remain unopened, and entire themes of biblical teaching are left unexplored.

But when pastors stop preaching prophecy, something important is lost. The church loses more than information about the future--it loses a vital perspective on the present.

And that loss carries serious consequences for the spiritual health of the church.




When prophecy disappears from the pulpit, the consequences reach far beyond the loss of an interesting theological topic. Bible prophecy shapes how believers understand history, culture, and the future. Without it, the church gradually loses its sense of spiritual urgency.

One of the first casualties is the expectation of Christ's return.

For the early church, the promise that Jesus could return at any moment was not a distant theological concept. It was a living hope that shaped daily life. The apostles frequently reminded believers to remain watchful and ready.

Paul wrote to the Thessalonians:

"For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout... and the dead in Christ will rise first." (1 Thessalonians 4:16)

To Titus he described the Christian life as one of anticipation:

"Looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus." (Titus 2:13)

When prophecy is regularly taught, believers are reminded that history is moving toward a divine conclusion. Christ will return. Evil will be judged. God's kingdom will be established.

But when prophecy disappears from preaching, the church slowly loses this forward-looking perspective. Christianity begins to focus almost entirely on the present life rather than the coming kingdom.


Another consequence is the loss of discernment. Prophecy provides a framework for understanding the spiritual and geopolitical movements of the world. It reminds believers that deception, global turmoil, and moral decline are not random developments but realities Scripture warned about long ago.

Jesus Himself cautioned His followers:

"Take heed that no one deceives you." (Matthew 24:4)

Without prophetic teaching, believers may struggle to interpret the signs of the times. Cultural trends, technological changes, and geopolitical events can appear confusing or overwhelming. The prophetic lens that once helped Christians navigate these developments is missing.

The church also loses a powerful motivation for holy living. Throughout the New Testament, the expectation of Christ's return is closely connected to personal holiness.

The apostle John wrote:

"And everyone who has this hope fixed on Him purifies himself, just as He is pure." (1 John 3:3)
Prophecy was never intended to be mere speculation about the future. It was meant to inspire watchfulness, faithfulness, and perseverance.

When the church forgets that Christ could return at any moment, spiritual complacency often follows. The urgency to live for eternity begins to fade.

In this way, the silence surrounding prophecy does more than leave a gap in biblical teaching. It subtly reshapes the mindset of the church itself.

And that may be one of the most revealing indicators of the spiritual condition of our time

Prophecy Was Never Meant to Be Optional

One of the greatest misconceptions in the modern church is the idea that Bible prophecy is optional. Some view it as a secondary doctrine--interesting perhaps, but not essential to Christian teaching. Others treat it as a niche subject reserved for theologians or prophecy conferences.

But Scripture presents a very different picture.

From the opening chapters of Genesis to the final pages of Revelation, the Bible unfolds as a prophetic story. God does not merely reveal what has happened in the past or what believers should do in the present. He also reveals what will happen in the future.

Through the prophet Isaiah, the Lord declared:

"Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times things which have not been done, saying, 'My purpose will be established, and I will accomplish all My good pleasure.'" (Isaiah 46:10)

God is not reacting to history--He is directing it. Long before kingdoms rise or fall, before empires appear on the world stage, and before the final chapters of human history unfold, the Lord has already revealed the outcome.

This is one of the unique characteristics of the Bible. No other religious text contains the same level of detailed, predictive prophecy. Throughout Scripture, God repeatedly demonstrated His authority by revealing future events long before they occurred. When those events unfolded exactly as foretold, His Word was vindicated.

The first coming of Jesus Christ provides the clearest example of this. Centuries before His birth, the prophets described the circumstances of the Messiah's arrival. Micah foretold that He would be born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2). Isaiah described the suffering servant who would bear the sins of many (Isaiah 53). Zechariah predicted that the Messiah would enter Jerusalem riding on a donkey (Zechariah 9:9) and that He would be betrayed for thirty pieces of silver (Zechariah 11:12-13).

These were not vague predictions. They were precise declarations that came to pass exactly as God had spoken.

The life, death, and resurrection of Jesus fulfilled dozens of prophecies written centuries earlier. From His birthplace to His crucifixion, the events of the Gospel unfolded according to the prophetic Scriptures. This pattern establishes an important principle: if the prophecies concerning Christ's first coming were fulfilled literally and precisely, there is every reason to expect that the prophecies concerning His second coming will be fulfilled in the same way.

Yet this is precisely where many churches hesitate.

While the first coming of Christ is celebrated and preached regularly, the prophetic promises surrounding His return are often neglected. The same Scriptures that foretold His birth, death, and resurrection also speak extensively about His return, the Tribulation, the rise of the Antichrist, the judgment of the nations, and the establishment of Christ's kingdom.

To treat those passages as optional is to overlook a significant portion of God's revealed Word.

Even more striking is the fact that Jesus Himself spoke frequently about the future. Entire sections of the Gospels are devoted to His prophetic teaching. In the Olivet Discourse, recorded in Matthew 24-25, Mark 13, and Luke 21, Jesus described the conditions that would characterize the last days. He warned of deception, wars, earthquakes, persecution, and global upheaval. He spoke of the coming Tribulation and of His visible return to the earth in power and glory.

These were not obscure or incidental remarks. They were central elements of His teaching.

In fact, Jesus often connected prophecy directly to the spiritual readiness of His followers. Over and over again He urged believers to remain watchful and prepared.

"Therefore be on the alert, for you do not know which day your Lord is coming." (Matthew 24:42)

The apostles carried this same emphasis into their teaching. Paul described believers as those who are "looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus" (Titus 2:13). Peter urged believers to live holy and godly lives as they anticipate "the coming of the day of God" (2 Peter 3:12).


Even the final book of the Bible opens with a remarkable promise concerning prophecy itself:

"Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near." (Revelation 1:3)

Notice that the blessing is not limited to scholars or theologians. It is given to those who read it, hear it, and take it seriously.

In other words, God never intended prophecy to remain hidden in the background of church life. It was meant to be proclaimed, understood, and embraced by believers.

When pastors avoid preaching prophetic passages, they are not merely skipping over a few difficult verses. They are leaving unexplored a significant portion of the biblical narrative. The grand story of redemption moves toward a future climax when Christ returns to judge evil and establish His kingdom.

Without prophecy, that story feels incomplete.

The church is left with a gospel that looks backward to the cross but rarely looks forward to the crown. Yet the full message of Scripture points to both. The same Savior who came once in humility will come again in glory.

Prophecy reminds believers that history is not spiraling out of control. It is moving toward the fulfillment of God's plan.
And for that reason, prophecy was never meant to be optional. It is woven into the very fabric of Scripture itself--and it remains one of the clearest reminders that the God who spoke in the past will also bring His promises for the future to pass.










Australia Has One Month Before Energy Crisis And Fuel Rationing



Australia Has One Month Before Energy Crisis And Fuel Rationing 
TYLER DURDEN


If there is one prevailing misconception about the war in Iran, it is the idea that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz will hurt the US the most.  This is simply not the case.  In reality, only around 7% of US oil imports actually travel through the Hormuz to get to American markets.  The potential long term instability in the strait is far more damaging to economies in the East, and by extension, Australia faces potential crisis.

Direct petroleum imports are not the biggest problem for Australia; around 15% of their oil crosses the Hormuz.  Instead, the country relies heavily on refined fuel products exported from Asia, and Asian countries rely on the Hormuz for 40% to 70% of total oil needed for the refining process.  Over 50% of Australia's refined fuel products rely on oil passing through the Hormuz.   

This means that a vast majority of Australia's diesel, gasoline, jet fuel and kerosene is on the verge of a supply collapse should the Hormuz remain under threat.  Experts suggest the country has one month before crisis strikes and rationing is implemented.  


Contracted shipments of oil to Australia were all but guaranteed for at least the next month, Energy Minister Chris Bowen said.  

"The oil companies say to me that they fully expect all deliveries all through March and well into April, but we are in an internationally uncertain time and that's why we're doing such planning at the moment..."

NRMA spokesman Peter Khoury has urged people to remain calm, saying there has never been a point in Australia's history when supply wasn't coming in. 

"As long as supply continues there is no need to panic, and supply has been continuing..."

The reasons for Australia's oil vulnerability are numerous, but much of the blame can be attributed to a lack of government concern over energy independence and an ongoing progressive obsession with climate change and "green energy" projects.  

The Aussie government does subsidize the domestic oil industry, however, this is done largely to maintain rather than expand capacity.  Australia's two refineries are aging and contribute only 20% of the nation's total fuel products.  Asian imports are cheaper, but that's only under stable geopolitical conditions (which is becoming obvious).  Australia's refusal to improve and expand their own production is coming back to bite them.

On top of their crippling reliance on Asia, the far-left Australian government has set the country up for economic suicide by implementing nonsensical carbon restrictions and climate change mandates.  They have diverted over $22 billion into green tech, which is far less efficient and not yet capable of running the majority of their power infrastructure.

Oil exploration is increasingly difficult and there are no plans for new refineries. Furthermore, nuclear energy is completely banned since 1998. 

Australia's entire energy infrastructure is built around a "just in time" import model.  Meaning, the country does not have a reliable long term store of fuel products for emergency use.  The government only introduced a "Minimum Stockholding Obligation" (MSO) in 2023 due to the start of the Ukraine war.  This gives the economy around 30 days for supplies of all products before total breakdown. 

Australia is the only IEA member that has not met the mandatory 90 days of net import equivalent reserves since 2012 (most hold 140+ days on average)

And, given that they have limited domestic production, there is no way for the country to adapt to a crisis.  It would take them years to recover without ample imports.  Shipping data reveals oil supplies from the United States are now heading across the Pacific to help meet demand. 

More...

Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is nowhere close, UK defense official warns


Region Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is nowhere close, UK defense official warns



A credible multinational plan to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to safe commercial shipping is nowhere close to materializing, a senior British defense official said Wednesday, even as more than 3,000 vessels and 20,000 seafarers remain stranded in and around the waterway that Iran effectively shut down following U.S. and Israeli military strikes last month.


The warning from UK Armed Forces Minister Al Carns came on the same day that America's top intelligence official, Tulsi Gabbard, refused to tell senators whether she had cautioned President Donald Trump about the likelihood of Iran retaliating by closing the strait and striking Gulf neighbors, a question that has taken on growing urgency as the humanitarian and economic toll of the blockade deepens.


Carns told reporters Wednesday that the Iranian threat to shipping encompasses mines, fast attack boats, ballistic missiles, drones and other asymmetric capabilities, calling it "a significant military challenge" that requires "a multinational solution. We're not anywhere near that at the moment."


The British government says it is in discussions with allies worldwide about possible responses and has dispatched a team of military planners to U.S. Central Command, the Pentagon headquarters that oversees operations in the Middle East. Officials cautioned, however, that the talks remain at an early stage and are focused primarily on maintaining security once hostilities subside rather than on immediate action to break the blockade.


Trump himself has sent mixed signals on the issue, alternating between demanding that other countries send warships to force the strait open and insisting the United States does not need allied help. That inconsistency has complicated coalition-building efforts at a moment when maritime security experts say coordination is essential.


The human cost of the crisis took center stage Wednesday as the United Nations' International Maritime Organization opened a two-day emergency session in London to address the plight of the stranded fleet. The IMO confirmed that at least seven crew members have been killed since the conflict erupted last month.


Captain Andrew Cook, secretary general of the International Federation of Shipmasters' Associations, delivered a blunt assessment of conditions facing the trapped mariners. Seafarers are "sitting on board a steel box, basically imprisoned, because they can't get off the ship and the ship can't move," Cook said. Those aboard tankers, he added, are "surrounded by oil and gas. And some of them are being targeted by missiles. So it isn't a great place to be right now."


Cook urged world leaders not to treat seafarers as "pawns in a geopolitical conflict," a message directed squarely at the diplomats gathered for the IMO session.


The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow passage between Iran and Oman at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, is one of the world's most critical energy chokepoints. Roughly a fifth of global oil consumption passes through its waters on any given day, and its closure has sent energy markets into turmoil since fighting began.


More....




Russia And China Are More Involved In The War In Iran Than Most People Realize


Michael Snyder


It appears that Iran is quietly getting quite a bit of help from Russia and China. As you will see below, it is being alleged that China is mass producing drones for the Iranians, and one report is claiming that hundreds of Chinese military and technical personnel are “feared dead or slowly suffocating” because they were hiding in underground bunkers that have been destroyed by U.S. and Israeli airstrikes. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal is claiming that Russia has been sharing technology with the Iranians and has been providing targeting information for their drone and missile strikes. It seems that Russia and China are more involved in the war in Iran than most people realize, and that should deeply alarm all of us.

I am about to share some information with you that absolutely shocked me when I first came across it.

Independent journalist Jennifer Zeng claims to have access to intelligence that comes from a former senior Chinese official that still has high level access. According to this source, hundreds of military and technical personnel that had been sent to help the Iranians defeat the U.S. and Israel are “now trapped in underground bunkers with zero communication”. The following is the complete report that Zeng has posted on X

Fresh intelligence from inside the Chinese Communist regime reveals a far larger disaster than previously known: at least seven technicians from Chinese drone maker DJI were killed in U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on Iran, while 300 to 400 Chinese military and technical personnel are now trapped in underground bunkers with zero communication — many feared dead or slowly suffocating.

The information comes directly from a former senior CCP official, relayed through Canadian writer and dissident Sheng Xue @ShengXue_ca. The bunkers, which Beijing and Tehran had touted as “absolutely safe,” were hit with devastating precision after Iranian insiders leaked their exact coordinates to Israel. What was meant to shield key assets has become a mass grave for Chinese advisors embedded deep in Iranian military sites.

Adding to the confirmed deaths of three elite radar experts from CETC’s 14th Research Institute in Nanjing — whose bodies were completely vaporized in the opening U.S. bombing wave — the scale now points to a catastrophic failure of Xi Jinping’s covert support for Iran. These three specialists, Beijing’s self-proclaimed “best” for countering American F-35 and F-22 stealth fighters, died alongside Iranian personnel with no remains recoverable.

Families of the Nanjing trio have been summoned to the CCP’s Organization Department for “post-incident handling.” Compensation is promised, though the figure is still undisclosed. The regime’s standard playbook — large hush-money payments to buy silence — is already in motion.

No official statement has come from China’s Foreign Ministry, Defense Ministry, or state media. The blackout is total, as Beijing refuses to admit its personnel are dying in a foreign war it publicly denies involvement in.

This unfolding tragedy is a brutal public humiliation for Xi. President Trump’s strikes have exposed China’s reckless proxy role in propping up Iran’s collapsing defenses, while European elites — protecting their vast hidden stakes in Iranian oil — seethe at the disruption to their globalist networks.

Hundreds of Chinese lives hang in the balance, buried alive in foreign bunkers, paid off in silence money, and erased by the world’s most efficient censorship apparatus. Xi’s gamble has turned deadly — and the body count is still rising.

(Solely based on updated, firsthand information from Sheng Xue via her CCP-regime source — a former senior official with current access. No speculation or invention.)


Of course she is not the only one that is talking about the help that China has been providing to the Iranians.

The Sun has published an article that discusses shocking new video footage that appears to show a Chinese factory mass producing Iranian suicide drones…

CHINA has been accused of helping Iran build its suicide drone armada after a video appearing to show a Shahed production line emerged.

Footage shared by a factory on Douyin, Beijing‘s domestic TikTok, shows UAVs being assembled at a workshop.

Other clips show multiple drones – resembling Tehran‘s lethal Shaheds – lined up in a warehouse before being shipped out.



Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal is claiming that Russia has been “providing satellite imagery and improved drone technology to aid Tehran’s targeting of U.S. forces in the region”…

Russia has been expanding its intelligence sharing and military cooperation with Iran, providing satellite imagery and improved drone technology to aid Tehran’s targeting of U.S. forces in the region, people familiar with the matter said.

Russia is trying to keep its closest Middle Eastern partner in the fight against U.S. and Israeli military might and prolong a war that is benefiting Russia militarily and economically.


If this is true, this makes Russia a party to the war in Iran just like we are a party to the war in Ukraine because of the assistance that we have been giving to the Ukrainians.

Thanks to the technology that the Russians have shared, the Iranians have reportedly been able to improve the navigation and the targeting of their drones

The technology provided includes components of modified Shahed drones, which are meant to improve communication, navigation and targeting, the people said. Russia has also been drawing on its experience using drones in Ukraine, offering tactical guidance on how many drones should be used in operations and what altitudes they should strike from, said the people, who included a senior European intelligence officer.

Without a doubt, Iranian drones are being more effective than they have in the past.

How much credit should the Russians get for that?

In addition, the Russians have apparently been “providing satellite imagery directly to Iran” that has allowed the Iranians to hit targets throughout the Middle East with a very high level of precision…

Russia has been providing Iran with the locations of U.S. military forces in the Middle East as well as those of its regional allies, The Wall Street Journal has reported. That cooperation has deepened in early days of the war, with Russia recently providing satellite imagery directly to Iran, said two of the people, the officer and a Middle Eastern diplomat.

The assistance is similar to intelligence the U.S. and European allies have given to Ukraine in recent years, analysts say. In the Gulf, Moscow’s aid is believed to have helped Iran with recent strikes on U.S. radar systems in the region, said the people. Those strikes have included an early warning radar for a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or Thaad, system in Jordan, as well as other targets in Bahrain, Kuwait and Oman.


It appears that we are far closer to war with both Russia and China than most people in the western world ever imagined.

Since Iran has been such a close ally, Russia and China would both love for the regime in Iran to survive.

The regime has certainly been weakened, but it is not done yet.

In fact, missiles that were just launched by the regime have hit the largest natural gas facility in the entire world…

Missiles caused ‘extensive damage’ in Qatar tonight hours after Iran threatened to wage a ‘full scale economic war’ by attacking energy facilities across the Middle East.

Video showed huge explosions in Ras Laffan – the world’s biggest natural gas plant – as well as Saudi Arabia’s capital Riyadh.

Energy sites in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar were evacuated after Tehran warned it would hit them with strikes in ‘the coming hours’.


This facility in Qatar produces approximately 20 percent of the world’s natural gas.

If it is shut down, we will immediately be facing a global natural gas shortage.

In Saudi Arabia, a “bright orange fireball lit up the sky” after the capital city of Riyadh was struck by Iranian missiles…

Striking video shows the moment Saudi Arabia’s capital Riyadh was targeted by missiles.

A bright orange fireball lit up the sky as huge explosions rocked the city.

It comes just hours after Iran threatened to wage a ‘full scale economic war’ by attacking energy facilities across the Middle East.


Saudi Arabia possesses 17 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves, and before the war started it was producing nearly 10 million barrels of oil per day.