Wednesday, June 3, 2026

Amazon Plans Data Center In Wheatfield, Indiana; Will Pay $1.25BN To Reduce Energy Cost Impact On Local Payers


Amazon Plans Data Center In Wheatfield, Indiana; Will Pay $1.25BN To Reduce Energy Cost Impact On Local Payers

 Georgia Butler of DataCenterDynamics

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is seeking to develop a data center campus in Wheatfield, Indiana. Meanwhile, on the other side of the globe, the cloud giant has purchased more land in India.

Located in Jasper County and southwest of Michigan City, Wheatfield is a small town and has a population of around 900 as per the 2020 census. AWS presented its plans for the data center during a recent open house at Kankakee Valley High School, as per a report from the Kankakee Valley Post News, in which it said it was looking to build a campus with up to nine buildings on a 304-acre plot of land.

The land in question is currently owned by the Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO), with the Schahfer Generating Station located just a half mile away.

NIPSCO and AWS are in conversations regarding the project. The land is currently leased for agricultural use from the utility.

According to AWS, by locating the data center near the power plant, it would reduce costs related to infrastructure and transmission. Details about the project remain sparse, with discussions on going, but AWS is estimating an investment of around $7 billion. In addition, the project would increase tax revenue for Jasper County from around $1.2 million to more than $420m over the next 15 years.

Amazon will also pay $1.25bn to reduce the energy use cost impact on local ratepayers. The data center will use natural air cooling for around 98% of the year, so as to minimize water usage.

Speaking at the meeting, AWS president of economic development Roger Wehner said: "We want to go to places where people come in with eyes wide open and we can build a great partnership."

Should the project receive approval, construction is expected to begin quickly, with Wehner telling the audience: "We want to start growing with this community as soon as possible. As you can see, we’re already here. We’re already doing things. If it doesn’t work out, that’s okay, we’ll still love it. We won’t feel bad about a single thing we’ve done.”

AWS already has data centers in Northern Indiana, in New Carlisle, and is developing another in Hobart. The projects are part of a $15bn investment commitment to the area made by AWS in November 2025, in which the company said it aimed to add 2.4GW of capacity to the Hoosier State.

MetaUS SignalsDataBankNetrality, and Digital Crossroads all have a presence in Indiana, with a host of developers looking to develop new campuses across the state. Microsoft and Google have both announced data center builds in Indiana, in Mishawaka and Fort Wayne, respectively.

Meanwhile, in India, Amazon has purchased a 10.61-acre land parcel in Ambernath in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region for Rs 125.13 crore (~$13m), for data center development.

As reported by the Hindustan Times, the land was acquired from Lodha Developers, and the transaction was registered on May 26, 2026.

Amazon already owns an adjacent 49-acre plot, which it acquired in November 2024 from Macrotech Developers for Rs 450 crore ($48.35m). The company also acquired 38.18 acres of land from Lodha in Palava near Navi Mumbai in December 2024.

Plans for a data center campus at the site were revealed in April 2026. Up to six buildings could be developed, four of which will have seven stories and serve as data centers. The remaining two buildings will have two stories and be used to support the electrical and water needs of the data centers. The data centers will have a capacity of 473MW.

In December 2025, Amazon committed to investing $35bn in India, including in data centers and AI infrastructure. Earlier that year, AWS revealed plans to spend $8.3bn in developing cloud infrastructure for just one of its cloud regions - AWS Asia-Pacific (Mumbai).







Russian Foreign Ministry Says Moscow and Washington Avoided ‘Fatal Breakdown’ in Relations With Secret Talks Last Week

Russian Foreign Ministry Says Moscow and Washington Avoided ‘Fatal Breakdown’ in Relations With Secret Talks Last Week


While Russia is at war in Ukraine, and the US is in the Middle East, the ongoing process to normalize the bilateral relations was pushed to the back burner.

But the process is not dead, and the two superpowers reportedly avoided a major disruption by engaging in secret talks last week, as US and Russian experts met to discuss ‘mutual irritants’.

This comes a few days after top Russian aide Yuri Ushakov said that the Ukrainians are impeding the unfolding of the ‘understandings’ arrived at in the Donald J. Trump-Vladimir Putin summit in Anchorage, Alaska.

Slavyangrad on Telegram:

“Ukraine is hindering the implementation of Trump and Putin’s Anchorage agreements, said Russian Presidential Aide Ushakov. 

Many use the word ‘agreements’. I would say more precisely, ‘understandings’. Indeed, there were understandings reached about what a particular side would do in the context of resolving the Ukrainian conflict. The Americans promised to fulfill their part of these understandings, but, as I understand it, they encountered a number of difficulties, which are primarily related to the behavior of Kiev.”

Russia and US avoided 'FATAL BREAKDOWN' in relations — Russian MFA Russian & US experts met WEEK AGO to discuss 'mutual irritants' Russia 'ready to normalize' US relations IF 'its interests RESPECTED and internal affairs NOT interfered with'

The head of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Department of the North Atlantic, Alexander Gusarov, said that ‘the emerging dynamic of restoration in relations has yet to be tested’.


TASS reported:

“Moscow is ready to move toward normalizing relations with Washington, provided its interests are respected, and its internal affairs are not interfered with, head of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Department of the North Atlantic Alexander Gusarov said.

‘Of course, in terms of practical results, the emerging dynamic of restoration in relations has yet to be tested. However, no matter how long and arduous this path may be, we are ready to move forward, provided both sides adhere to the fundamental principles of respect for each other’s interests, mutual benefit, and non-interference in the internal affairs’, he said in an interview with the International Affairs magazine.”


Amid strike on Kuwait, Iran warns every Gulf ally of America


Amid strike on Kuwait, Iran warns every Gulf ally of America


Iran's Foreign Ministry stated on Wednesday, warning that any country in the region that provides the United States with assistance or military bases while American forces attack Iran will become a target. The warning came after Iran struck Kuwait and its international airport.

"The Foreign Ministry emphasizes that any action by a country that allows aggressors to use its land, sea, and airspace, or facilities and bases located on its territory, to carry out or support military aggression against Iran constitutes a clear violation of the fundamental rules of international law and the principle of good neighborliness, and is considered an act of aggression against Iran," the ministry's statement read.

The statement added, "In exercising its inherent right to defend Iran's territorial integrity and national sovereignty, the Islamic Republic of Iran will use all its capabilities to confront acts of aggression, including by targeting the source and origin of aggressive attacks."

Iran struck targets inside Kuwait overnight, causing significant damage to Kuwait City's international airport. Kuwait summoned Tehran's diplomatic representative for a formal dressing-down, and condemnations spread across the Arab world. The Revolutionary Guards simultaneously intensified their own threats. In a statement marking the anniversary of the death of Ruhollah Khomeini (founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran), the Guards wrote, "The enemy was forced to accept new rules" that, the Guards claimed, the Iranian nation and security forces had imposed on the ground, particularly in the management and control of the Strait of Hormuz.

The declaration read, "The resistance will continue with full force until the destruction of arrogant conspiracies, the expulsion of foreigners from West Asia, and the liberation of holy Quds [Jerusalem] with the destruction of the Zionist regime." The Revolutionary Guards also emphasized the continuation of what they called "resistance," describing it as part of the Islamic Republic's regional strategy.

American diplomatic sources revealed new details Wednesday about an annex to the US proposal to end the war with Iran and restore freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, as reported by the Emirati outlet Erem News. The sources told the outlet that Tehran had not yet sent a final response.

Under the annex, the Iranian regime is required to respond quickly and specifically about where its enriched uranium stockpile is located and how it will be transferred elsewhere. The annex also includes a framework for the passage of vessels through the Persian Gulf.

The American sources said the latest revision shifted the pressure to implementation mechanisms, with Washington wanting any start of negotiations to come in exchange for an Iranian declaration disclosing the location of its high-level enriched uranium stockpile – before any broad economic relief or reopening of vessel movement in the Strait of Hormuz.

The sources added that the clause regarding the Strait of Hormuz addressed details such as defined transit corridors, regular navigation notices, cessation of all selective inspections, and a ban on transit levies by Iranian entities.


Why More University Students View AI As An Existential Threat, Not An Exciting Innovation


Why More University Students View AI As An Existential Threat, Not An Exciting Innovation


In recent years, commencement ceremonies have become stages for more than celebration. They have become battlegrounds for ideas. Across several universities, commencement speakers discussing Artificial Intelligence have been met with visible discomfort, protests, and in some cases outright booing from graduating students.

While previous generations worried about globalization, outsourcing, or economic recessions, today’s graduates face something far more personal: the possibility that the very careers they spent years preparing for may be transformed, or even eliminated, by intelligent machines.

For many students, AI is not an exciting innovation. It is an existential threat. The question Christians should ask is not simply, “Why are students booing?” The deeper question is, “What does this reveal about the times in which we live?”

For decades, young people have been told a familiar formula: go to school, get good grades, earn a degree, and build a successful career. This promise has been repeated by parents, teachers, guidance counselors, universities, and governments alike. Yet as students walk across graduation stages today, they are entering a world where AI systems can already write reports, generate software code, create marketing campaigns, analyze legal documents, produce artwork, answer customer service inquiries, and even perform tasks once reserved for highly educated professionals.

Many graduates are realizing they may be competing not only with other people but with machines that never sleep, never demand benefits, and improve at astonishing speeds.

Their concern is understandable. When a commencement speaker celebrates AI while graduates worry about paying off student loans, the applause can quickly turn into boos, and it has.

The Anxiety Behind the Reaction

The negative response to AI discussions is not simply about technology. It is about uncertainty.

Many students sense that society is changing faster than they can adapt. They see headlines about corporations replacing workers with AI. They hear executives discuss automation. They watch entire industries being transformed in real time. They are being told that, in order to qualify for an entry-level position, they now must have experience. Is that the goal of starting at an entry level, to gain experience for future growth?

The result is growing anxiety. Ironically, many secular voices are beginning to recognize something Scripture has warned about for centuries: humanity’s pursuit of knowledge and power often creates problems it cannot control.

Technology itself is not evil. Human hearts remain the issue. The same AI system can be used to accelerate medical research or generate deception. It can help educate children or manipulate public opinion. It can enhance productivity or contribute to widespread unemployment.

Technology reflects the intentions of those who wield it.

The Tower of Babel Revisited?

The Bible records humanity’s first great technological rebellion in Genesis 11. At Babel, mankind united around a common purpose. Their goal was not merely architectural achievement but independence from God. Their action was rebellion against God.

They sought to build a civilization centered on human capability and human glory. The Lord intervened because humanity’s collective ambition was leading them further from dependence upon Him. Today we witness something remarkably similar. Global leaders, technology companies, governments, and researchers increasingly speak of AI as the solution to humanity’s greatest challenges. AI is being presented as the solution to disease, climate change, economic instability, education, and governance.

Some even suggest AI could become humanity’s most trusted advisor. In effect, many are looking to technology for answers that ultimately can only come from God. While AI is not the Tower of Babel, it reflects the same temptation: placing confidence in human ingenuity rather than divine wisdom.

The Rise of a Digital Priesthood

Historically, people turned to pastors, teachers, parents, and community leaders for guidance.

However, today millions are increasingly turning to algorithms. AI systems are rapidly becoming counselors, advisors, tutors, therapists, and information providers. A growing number of people are more likely to ask an AI chatbot a life question than seek biblical counsel.

This trend should concern believers. The issue is not whether AI can provide information. The issue is whether people begin assigning authority to machines that belongs only to God. The prophet Isaiah warned: “Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight” (Isaiah 5:21). A society that places ultimate trust in artificial intelligence may discover that intelligence without wisdom becomes dangerous.

Prophetic Implications

Bible prophecy does not specifically mention artificial intelligence by name. However, it does describe a future world characterized by unprecedented global connectivity, centralized control, surveillance capabilities, economic monitoring, and deception.

The technology emerging today is making many of these capabilities possible. The book of Revelation describes a future system in which buying and selling can be controlled. It describes a world united under global authority, and it warns of unprecedented deception. While AI itself is not the Antichrist, it may become one of the most powerful tools ever created for implementing systems of control.

The same technologies that make life easier can also make freedom more fragile. University students are sensing this tension. Even if they cannot articulate it in biblical terms, many recognize that something significant is changing.

Why the Church Must Pay Attention

The Church cannot afford to ignore the AI revolution. Some Christians dismiss technology discussions as irrelevant to spiritual matters. Others embrace every innovation uncritically.

Neither approach is wise. Believers are called to exercise discernment.

Yes, technology presents tremendous opportunities for ministry, education, communication, and outreach. Yet it also presents unprecedented opportunities for manipulation, deception, and dependence upon systems that may increasingly oppose biblical truth.

The Church’s task is not to fear technology. The Church’s task is to understand it through a biblical worldview. We must teach the next generation that their identity is not found in their careers. That will be what they do, NOT who they are. We must teach the next generation that their value is not determined by economic productivity. Their hope is not rooted in technological progress. Their security is found in Christ alone.

The Real Answer to the Fear

The students booing commencement speakers may be expressing more than frustration. They may be revealing the deeper fears of an entire generation. Fear of being replaced, becoming irrelevant, or of losing control of the future. Yet Scripture reminds us that the future has never belonged to humanity, it belongs to God.

Technology will continue advancing. It’s not going to go backwards or stop. Artificial intelligence will be allowed to become more powerful. The world will continue moving toward conditions that resemble the prophetic warnings of Scripture.

But believers need not fear. Jesus Christ remains sovereign over every technological breakthrough, every global system, and every future development. The answer to artificial intelligence is not artificial hope. It is eternal hope.

As the world increasingly looks to machines for salvation, the Church must continue proclaiming the only message that truly saves: The Gospel of Jesus Christ. And perhaps that is the greatest lesson hidden behind the boos echoing across university campuses today. Students are searching for certainty in an uncertain age. The world offers algorithms. God offers truth.

The Silent Hunters: Why Militaries Are Terrified Of Fiber-Optic Drones


The Silent Hunters: Why Militaries Are Terrified Of Fiber-Optic Drones
PNW STAFF


For years, modern militaries believed they had finally found an answer to the drone threat. Electronic warfare systems could jam radio frequencies, disrupt communications, and turn enemy drones into expensive pieces of falling debris. Nations poured billions into anti-drone technology based on one simple assumption: if you sever the connection between the operator and the drone, the threat disappears.

That assumption is now being shattered on battlefields from Ukraine to Lebanon.

A new generation of fiber-optic drones is rapidly changing the nature of warfare, creating a technological challenge that many militaries--including some of the world's most advanced--are struggling to counter. These drones do not rely on radio signals. Instead, they drag a thin fiber-optic cable behind them, sometimes stretching for miles. Commands travel through the cable itself, making them virtually immune to traditional electronic jamming.

The result is a battlefield revolution that could alter military strategy for decades to come.

The technology first gained widespread attention during the war between Russia and Ukraine. Both sides had become masters of electronic warfare, constantly jamming each other's drones and communications. Conventional drones increasingly struggled to survive in heavily contested airspace.

Then came fiber-optic drones.

Because they communicate through physical cables rather than radio frequencies, they can fly directly into areas saturated with jamming equipment. Operators maintain crystal-clear control and video feeds even in environments where ordinary drones would instantly lose connection.

Military observers quickly recognized what this meant. A weapon once considered vulnerable had suddenly become much harder to stop.

Now that same lesson is confronting Israel.


For decades, Israel has been regarded as one of the most technologically sophisticated militaries on Earth. Time and again, Israeli intelligence and defense agencies have stunned the world with operations that seemed more like scenes from a spy thriller than real-life warfare.

The most famous recent example was the extraordinary operation involving exploding pagers and communication devices used by Hezbollah operatives. The attack demonstrated an unprecedented level of intelligence penetration and technological ingenuity. Israel reportedly managed to compromise devices deep inside Hezbollah's network, turning routine communications equipment into weapons against the very people carrying them.

Israel also spent years methodically penetrating Hezbollah's command structure, gathering intelligence that enabled precision strikes against senior commanders and key leadership figures. The organization's chain of command was repeatedly disrupted, creating the impression that Hezbollah had become increasingly vulnerable and incapable of mounting a sophisticated response.

The message seemed clear: Israel owned the technological high ground.

Yet warfare has a habit of humbling even the most advanced militaries.

Hezbollah's growing use of fiber-optic first-person-view (FPV) drones has created a challenge that Israeli planners apparently did not fully anticipate. Unlike traditional drones that can often be jammed or disrupted electronically, these systems continue operating even in environments packed with advanced countermeasures.

The results have been unsettling.

Hezbollah has released numerous videos showing drones hunting Israeli positions, tracking vehicles, and striking troops. While these attacks have not inflicted casualties on the scale of Israel's operations against Hezbollah, they have exposed an uncomfortable reality: highly trained soldiers can appear surprisingly vulnerable when targeted by inexpensive drones that are difficult to detect and nearly impossible to jam.

But the physical damage is only part of the story.