New Study Finds International Communists and Radical Leftists Are Leading French “Student” Protests

New Study Finds International Communists and Radical Leftists Are Leading French “Student” Protests – Only 1 in 3 Groups Are Students or Youth Groups

Jim Hoft

Less than one in three organizations leading the violent “student protests” in France are student groups or youth groups.

The rest of the groups are international agitators and communist groups.

They’ve launched their revolution on the West in France. How soon before these same communist, anarchist groups bring their violence to the streets of America!

Behind all of the chaos and street unrest is the American-born, Shanghai-based tech tycoon and communist Roy Singham.

Singham is accused of being behind the anti-ICE riots, the anti-Trump protests following the arrest of Maxist tyrant Nicholas Maduro in Venezuela, the anti-Trump Iran protests, Cuban propaganda in the US, and the “anti-Kings” protests in the US, to name a few.

And, Roy Singham is central to all of these staged and paid for protest movements in the US today.

The fake news WILL NEVER report on this. They must agree with him.

And now, we learn that Neville Roy Singham is indirectly funding the rioting in France.

FOX News Digital also reported that less than one-in-three groups linked to the French protests are student or youth groups.

A Fox News Digital investigation has found that a transnational network of far-left communist and socialist organizations is seizing on France’s fiery student protests to advance a wider political and ideological agenda, using tactics deployed in the United States over the past decade to amplify unrest, deepen divisions and project an image of chaos.

Earlier in the week, BreakThrough News splashed another headline across the front of its website: “French students shut down schools in historic strike against austerity,” mobilizing “with support from unions and progressive forces.”

But those “progressive forces” aren’t limited to students demanding education reform as part of their “Lycéenne Mobilisation,” or high school student mobilization.

From France to the United States, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Greece and India, adults with deep pockets are tapping France’s school protests and turning a domestic education dispute into a platform for broader political and ideological confrontation. BreakThrough News is a pro-communist propaganda outlet based in New York City, funded by an American-born, Shanghai-based communist tech tycoon, Neville Roy Singham, who has financed a network of communist and far-left groups in the U.S. that have capitalized on grievances to stoke similar street unrest for almost a decade.

A Fox News Digital investigation traces how a movement that the media is mostly framing as students protesting deteriorating school conditions is actually part of an extensive infrastructure of unions, communist activists, far-left political parties and international media organizations that are organizing demonstrations, calling strikes, mobilizing supporters and broadcasting the unrest around the world with “BREAKING” alerts.

In a digital analysis of scores of news articles, social media posts and public statements, Fox News Digital has identified 50 organizations in the French student protest movement and its wider network of supporters and international amplifiers, revealing an activist ecosystem extending far beyond the students who launched the demonstrations.

Of the network of 50 groups, 15 are student or youth groups, including several communist youth movements and a Muslim student association.

The Gateway Pundit’s Antonio Graceffo reported that Singham is the funder behind the communist part network that is fueling the anti-ICE protests across the US.

FBI Confirms Investigation Into Foreign Funding as Violence Spreads to 25+ Cities, and Cash Trail Leads Back to the Chinese Communist Party.

The anti-ICE riots engulfing Los Angeles and spreading to more than 25 American cities are not the spontaneous uprisings the mainstream media wants you to believe.

The Gates Foundation: Whistle-Blower Reveals Influence On NIH, Health Strategy

NIH has completely merged with the Gates Foundation

Rhoda Wilson

In June, a whistle-blower revealed that the US National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), the world’s largest funder of biomedical research, has completely merged with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (renamed ‘The Gates Foundation’). 

This isn’t a recent development; it became apparent to the NIH whistle-blower more than 10 years ago.

Gates was able to take control of the NIH by funding the agency’s own non-profit, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health.

How Bill Gates’ Billions Shape US Medical Research

By Paul Thacker,

On the eve of Gates’ private testimony with Congress scheduled for [9 June 2026], a trove of federal whistle-blower documents provided to RealClearInvestigations(“RCI”) is renewing questions about how Gates’ money has bought what critics complain is an untoward influence on government health policy. For almost a quarter of a century, his main vehicle of power, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), allowing Gates to shape the direction of the country’s health strategy in ways that have benefitted his own priorities and pet causes while polishing his image as a benevolent global do-gooder.

At a time of growing concern about the power of billionaires such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Sam Altman, Gates’ efforts stand out. Instead of lobbying federal agencies for specific policies, Gates leveraged his wealth to work inside the government, partnering with high-ranking NIH officials to steer taxpayer research funding and design scientific policies for several federal programmes.

The cache of several dozen emails and documents, made public for the first time by an NIH whistle-blower, reinforces previous reports detailing Gates’s extensive influence over US biomedical research. During the height of the covid pandemic, Kate Elder, a senior vaccines policy adviser for Doctors Without Borders, complained to Politico, “What makes Bill Gates qualified to be giving advice and advising the US government on where they should be putting the tremendous resources?”

Emails and internal plans, for example, show that the NIH – the world’s largest funder of biomedical research – gave the Gates Foundation first billing for the joint workshops and meetings held on federal property.

The Gates Foundation did not respond to repeated requests for comment. The NIH also declined to comment.

Like most philanthropies, the Gates Foundation tries to grow its endowment through investments. Some of these efforts, especially its stake in vaccine companies, blur the lines between profit-seeking and the foundation’s mission to develop and deliver vaccines around the world. This symbiotic relationship between capitalism and charity also benefits Gates, whose power and position hinge in large part on the size of his foundation’s assets. Before the pandemic, The Nation magazine reported that the Gates Foundation had a $40 million stake in CureVac – this was not a grant but an investment. CureVac was one of many companies the non-profit bought stock in that were working on covid vaccines and therapeutics.

Around that same period, the Gates Foundation announced that it had begun to “leverage a portion of its $2.5 billion Strategic Investment Fund” to advance the non-profit’s covid work. The Gates Foundation also turned a $55 million investment in Pfizer’s covid vaccine partner, BioNTech, into over $550 million when it sold stock a couple of years later after the vaccine hit the market.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was established in 2000 with an initial endowment of $20 billion and a primary focus on reducing global health disparities. Rather than working exclusively through non-governmental agencies, the Gates Foundation began contributing to the NIH through the agency’s own non-profit, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (“FNIH”). Congress created the FNIH in 1990 as a firewall between NIH officials and outside donors seeking to influence federal research.

That firewall is not ironclad. In 2018, for example, NIH officials, funded by beer and liquor companies through an FNIH grant, were in frequent contact with the alcohol industry while designing a study that seemed predetermined to find alcohol’s benefits but not potential harms, such as cancer. The NIH also declined money in 2018 from drugmakers to support a proposed $400 million research programme to discover opioid alternatives and addiction treatments. Like the alcohol funds, that drugmaker money would have also been routed through the FNIH.

In 2003, the Gates Foundation donated $200 million to the FNIH to fund NIH scientific programmes, an unprecedented sum. Rice University researchers warned in 2008 that this Gates cash was shifting the NIH’s scientific priorities, even though the money was cycled through the FNIH. While FNIH manages and administers Gates money, they said, the Gates Foundation’s scientific board ultimately “oversees and selects the projects to be funded” at the NIH.

After Gates gave an NIH lecture in 2013, NIH documents show that the agency began hosting Gates-NIH Workshops, eventually synchronising federal research programmes with Gates, to include coordinating grant funding and science policies across 10 NIH programmes.

“Bill Gates, along with the NIH, the Wellcome Trust, it was this cartel,” the whistle-blower, a former NIH official who requested anonymity, told RCI. “This is a globalist movement. And that’s something that I don’t think the public knows.”

The Gates Foundation held its second annual meeting with the NIH in July 2105, with both sides proposing new areas of teamwork, and later agreeing to cooperate on funding and research policies for global health. One area of overlap was the West African Ebola outbreaks. To align the Gates Foundation’s Ebola research with the federal agency, Gates routed money through the FNIH so that NIH employees could hire the McKinsey consulting firm.

At no point in the several dozen emails and documents provided to RCI did NIH officials appear to raise any concerns about conflicts of interest regarding their work with Gates, nor the hiring of McKinsey to shape federal research and development policies. McKinsey is a global consulting firm whose clients include dozens of foreign governments and some of the world’s largest corporations.

House Democrats released an April 2022 investigation that documented McKinsey’s conflicts of interest during the opioid epidemic that killed tens of thousands of Americans, finding that McKinsey provided consulting advice to both Purdue Pharma and the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) from 2008 to 2019. In one example, the report surfaced emails with McKinsey employees congratulating themselves for influencing a 2018 speech on opioid safety by then-FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb.

When Congress brought McKinsey managing partner Bob Sternfels before cameras during a 2022 public hearing, he alleged that his firm did not have a conflict of interest when it gave simultaneous advice to both OxyContin’s manufacturer and the government agency that regulated OxyContin. Two years later, McKinsey paid a $650 million fine to resolve a criminal and civil investigation into the firm’s consulting work with Purdue Pharma.

“The NIH and BMGF [Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation] have had a long history of interaction, particularly with respect to vaccines and drugs,” reads the NIH summary of the 2015 Gates-NIH meeting.

A longtime NIH official said that the agency’s leadership initially held Gates at arm’s length, but eventually gave in. “They were very suspicious at first,” said the official, who requested anonymity. “But they got caught up in, ‘Wow, he’s the richest man in the world!’”

The NIH official added, “What I saw, which really, I think, extends until this day, is a complete merging of NIH and Gates. And I’ve never seen that written anywhere. I don’t think people realise this incredible symbiotic relationship.”

More....

Genocide?

They Call It Genocide

Tom Gilbreath

Is Israel committing genocide against the people of Gaza? Few accusations have ever been stated with more repetition or greater volume. Merriam-Webster defines “genocide” as “the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group.” We call the Holocaust “genocide” because the Nazis were trying to destroy the Jewish people. They succeeded in killing two-thirds of Europe’s Jewish population — two-thirds! 

 

Israel’s critics have been accusing it of genocide against the Palestinian people — Arabs living in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza — for years. Just 13 days after October 7, Zohran Mamdani, now mayor of New York City, stood with a bullhorn in his hand accusing Israel of genocide. But Israel’s ground offensive hadn’t even begun yet.

 

Was there genocide against Palestinians before October 7, 2023, as is commonly claimed? Look at the numbers. Before Israel declared independence on May 14, 1948, and the other events Palestinians call the Nakba, or “catastrophe,” 1.4 million Arabs lived in Gaza, the West Bank, and what soon became Israel. By 2023, after the “catastrophe” and decades of accusations of genocide, the Arab population in those areas had risen from 1.4 million to 7 million. During the same years, the US population a little more than doubled — while the Palestinian population quintupled. It grew to five times its former size. As Pastor Tom Hughes has said, “That’s not a genocide; that’s a baby boom.”

 

But what about Israel’s actions after October 7, 2023? We’ve seen the horrible pictures of dead or dying children. We’ve seen the bombed out-buildings. But civilian deaths and destruction, however terrible, do not by themselves establish genocide. In just one night of World War II, U.S. firebombing of Tokyo killed a hundred thousand people. The U.S. and its allies carpet bombed Berlin. That was war — and war is horrible. But sometimes, war is necessary. 

 

Hamas brutally attacked Israel. Its leaders publicly said that they would continue such attacks. Their goal, stated repeatedly, is not a two-state solution, but Israel’s complete destruction. To this day, they and their allies repeat their genocidal goal every time they chant, “From the river to the sea,” or “Death to Israel,” or “Gas the Jews.”

 

Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has said, “Israel has an inherent and inalienable right to defend itself.” To me it seems self-evident that all nations have, not just the right, but the obligation to defend their people. For years, Hamas has been firing rockets into Israel. After October 7, they fired thousands of such rockets from residential buildings, mosques, schools, and even hospitals. Their actions made those areas legitimate military targets. They do this knowing that civilian deaths in high numbers help their cause. 

 

Yahya Sinwar was the leader of Hamas in Gaza until his death. On June 10, 2024, The Wall Street Journal paraphrased Sinwar telling his comrades that “high civilian casualties would create worldwide pressure on Israel.” Sinwar called civilian casualties “necessary sacrifices.” 

 

Israel, on the other hand, has taken extensive measures to limit civilian casualties. John Spencer is chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point and a retired U.S. Army Major. He wrote, “In the Gaza war, Israel has demonstrated a historically low combatant-to-civilian casualty ratio (1:1.5 or 1:1) when compared to any urban warfare history with even remotely similar conditions.”

 

When you see photos of bombed out buildings in Gaza, weep for the children. But remember that Hamas placed weapons and combatants inside such buildings and built miles of tunnels beneath them. Hamas is not the innocent victim of Israel. The people of Gaza are the victims of Hamas.

Zelenskyy Condemns US-Russia Diesel Deal As Russian Strike Kills 12 In Ukraine

Zelenskyy Condemns US-Russia Diesel Deal As Russian Strike Kills 12 In Ukraine

Worthy News

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy accused the United States on Saturday of helping finance Russia’s invasion of his country through a new diesel supply agreement with Moscow, as Ukrainian families mourned 12 people, including three children, killed in a Russian airstrike.

Zelenskyy condemned the agreement announced Friday by U.S.President Donald J. Trump following talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, warning that additional energy revenues would enable Moscow to continue its military campaign.

“Gifts to Putin will not bring peace or any benefit to the civilised world,” Zelenskyy wrote on social media platform X. He described allowing Russia to sell petroleum products as an investment in prolonging the war rather than ending it.

His criticism came as rescue workers searched the rubble of residential buildings in the southeastern Ukrainian city of Zaporizhzhia, where Russian glide bombs killed civilians, including a six-year-old girl whose grandfather wept as rescuers recovered her body.

“Her birthday would have been at the end of the month,” Anatoliy Chumniy, the girl’s grandfather, said through tears as emergency workers continued searching the wreckage.

Ukrainian officials said 14 people were wounded in the attack, which struck several locations in Zaporizhzhia, an industrial city whose outskirts lie less than 30 kilometers (20 miles) from the frontline.

Zelenskyy linked the bloodshed to Washington’s decision to ease economic pressure on Moscow, accusing Russia of effectively thanking the United States by dropping five glide bombs on residential buildings.

He warned that Moscow interpreted any easing of sanctions as permission to continue attacking Ukrainian cities rather than an incentive to negotiate an end to the fighting.

Trump defended the agreement with Putin as necessary to bring down soaring American diesel prices, which have risen sharply amid the US conflict with Iran and disruptions to international energy supplies.

Higher diesel costs have affected American farmers, truck drivers and businesses transporting goods, raising concerns about inflation ahead of November’s congressional elections.

Trump said Russia would immediately supply more than 300,000 tons of diesel to American and global markets, followed by another 500,000 tons in November, one million tons shortly afterward and a further three million tons within a relatively short period, depending on Russian refinery conditions.

“Diesel Prices for Americans and, indeed, the World, will be COMING DOWN, IN RECORD NUMBERS, AND FAST!”,

Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

“Lower prices for Americans, especially our Great Farmers, Ranchers, and Truckers, is my Greatest Priority,” Trump added.

The agreement came amid disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for international oil supplies, which have contributed to higher energy prices worldwide.

The U.S.Treasury Department subsequently issued a temporary license allowing transactions involving Russian diesel through April 7, 2027, easing restrictions imposed on Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine.

Zelenskyy expressed frustration that the agreement was announced while Ukrainian and European representatives were meeting American officials in Miami to discuss proposals for ending the war.

The discussions involved Trump’s envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, as Washington continued efforts to negotiate a settlement between Kyiv and Moscow.

“I believe our team is simply being used as a front. And that is certainly not fair, nor is it how partners should treat each other,” Zelenskyy told reporters through the WhatsApp messaging service.

“In my view, it is a weak decision on the part of strong partners,” he added, warning that the arrangement would provide Russia with additional funds for military operations.

The agreement also drew criticism from American lawmakers, including Democrats who accused Trump of undermining sanctions designed to restrict Russia’s ability to finance its invasion.

Republican Congressman Don Bacon joined the criticism, writing on X: “Propping up Putin’s war economy is morally wrong as he uses that money to bomb cities.”

The arrangement follows new American legislation allowing sanctions against individuals, financial institutions and vessels involved in Russian energy trading, although the president retains authority to grant exemptions.

Amid the controversy, Germany, Europe’s largest economy, reaffirmed its commitment to sanctions against Russia, with government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius saying Berlin would continue working with European partners on further measures while maintaining support for Ukraine.

Yet the European Union has also continued purchasing Russian energy, paying an estimated 7.88 billion euros ($9.1 billion) for Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) during the first nine months of 2026, despite its pledge to reduce Moscow’s energy revenues as the war in Ukraine continues, German environmental campaign group Urgewald reported Saturday.

Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski questioned whether Moscow could fulfill the promised diesel deliveries, citing fuel shortages in the Russian capital and reports of extensive damage to the country’s refineries.

Western Civilization in Peril--Coming to a Head

Western Civilization in Peril--Coming to a Head

Ray DiLorenzo

The Brits lament their lost identity as the government prioritizes non-English-speaking immigrants

In the United Kingdom, the normal citizen has become an embarrassment, almost a threat to the elites. The British people work diligently to support themselves and their families, yet the government regards them with disdain, as if they were the unwashed.

The British government is like the husband who is tired of his wife, who works diligently to keep a clean home, but he has grown bored and found other interests.

The Brits lament their lost identity as the government prioritizes non-English-speaking immigrants.

Britain today is similar to living under the Biden administration on steroids. They are constantly lectured about climate change, including constant accusations that they are driving the wrong car, using the wrong lawn mower, the wrong stove, having the wrong heating system in their homes, and consuming too much electricity, all while being told they are not sufficiently concerned about the planet.

Everyone in Britain eventually has access to a doctor, with many receiving 'end-of-life' counseling instead of treatment. This situation is not much different in Canada, where you can often see Canadian license plates in Montana and other northern states. If you speak with these Canadians, many will share that they are receiving medical care here in the United States.

Europe has lost much of their free speech, their culture, and certainly their religion. In Germany, insulting a politician is criminal. In the UK, there have been over 12,000 arrests for online speech, including jokes or mild criticism, just in 2023.

Christianity has all but disappeared. It may be meaningless to those who have never grasped that Western Civilization owes a great deal to Christianity. Democracy, individual rights, natural law, math, science, art, music, and confronting mankind's darkness are because of Christianity.

This massive influx of poor, culturally foreign peoples has caused a serious population explosion that Europe and America can ill afford. With an already established social welfare state, Europe will need to cut programs, leading to social pressures that are resulting in riots and violence.

We are currently witnessing this in France, where the far left and Islamic groups have joined forces and are rioting. Do not trust the official explanations regarding the conditions in high schools. It is a political movement for power among the far left and Islamic forces. This situation is similar to what is happening in America. The trend is evident with the collaboration between the Democrat Party and Islamic factions.

It's important to pay attention to the Left's actions in both America and Europe rather than simply listening to their words. Alarmingly, extremist groups are celebrating the October 7 massacre of 1,200 innocent Jewish people in major cities like New York, Los Angeles, Seattle, and Minneapolis. Antisemitism is present and thriving within these blocs on the Left.

What they are demanding is the end of immigration enforcement, their ticket to a socialist globalist world. If they fail to achieve their objectives in November, we should be prepared for the potential of violence.

Europe is no longer strictly capitalist. They have a capitalist system that is mixed with a massive social welfare component. They are closer to being fascist than socialist.

The political forces within the Far Left Democrat Party, allied with Islam, have joined forces to bring chaos to our constitutional republic and eliminate Western civilization. In the United States they want to pack the Supreme Court, do away with the Senate and the Electoral College, and greatly limit the power of the presidency to government by a politburo. In fact, they want a socialist government, crossbred with a brand of democracy where they can never lose power...all the ingredients of being a socialist dictatorship. It's been estimated to have a cost of $49 trillion.

Along with the rise of Islam, there has been a shocking increase in antisemitism among its followers, which any historian would recognize as containing all the elements of a National Socialist Party or the NAZI Party. Adolf Hitler worked closely with Mullahs in the Middle East to round up Jews for their concentration camps and the gas chambers.

The midterm elections will be a test of how the world's far left is doing in its effort to turn the USA toward socialism. This decade will tell the tale. America will be the ultimate test.