Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Earthquake swarm sends shockwaves rippling over 100 miles across California


Earthquake swarm sends shockwaves rippling over 100 miles across California


A swarm of moderate earthquakes has struck California, sending shockwaves in all directions for over 100 miles.

The US Geological Survey (USGS) detected the first and largest of the quakes at 4.10pm ET Tuesday afternoon between the cities of Willits and Ukiah, measuring 4.4 in magnitude.

The epicenter was approximately 120miles north of San Francisco, the region's largest major city.

Seismic maps of the incident revealed that the 4.4 tremor rippled all the way to the San Francisco Bay Area, sending out light shaking up and down the coast.

The quake was quickly following by three minor tremors, measuring at magnitude 1.7 at 4.16pm, magnitude 1.5 at 4.21pm, and magnitude 1.4 at 5.14pm.

Nearly two hours after the first earthquake, USGS reported that a magnitude 3.7 seismic event was detected at 5.51pm. 

The sizable quakes were centered in a seismically active part of the state roughly 10miles from Northern California's Maacama Fault.

The Maacama is an active fault line in the region that can cause strong shaking and damage in areas like Mendocino and Sonoma counties, where it runs through rural communities and wine country.

Making the fault even more of a concern to locals is the fact that it's part of the larger San Andreas Fault system, the infamous 800-mile-long fault running through much of California.

The 4.4 quake struck less than five miles beneath the surface, which is shallow enough to cause a significant amount of shaking at ground level.


USGS scientists have documented that the Maacama Fault has produced large earthquakes in the past and could potentially generate one in the future which could exceed magnitude 7.0 in strength.

Tuesday's quakes have renewed fears that a major earthquake is not only possible in Northern California and the Bay Area, but is nearly guaranteed to erupt within the next 20 years.


More...





Strong and shallow M6.2 earthquake hits Kuril Islands, Russia


Strong and shallow M6.2 earthquake hits Kuril Islands, Russia


A strong and shallow earthquake registered by the USGS as M6.2 struck the Kuril Islands region, Russia, at 07:34 UTC on January 13, 2026. The agency is reporting a depth of 35.8 km (22.2 miles). EMSC is reporting M6.3 at a depth of 20 km (12.4 miles).

The epicenter was located 133 km (83 miles) SE of Kuril’sk (population 1 607), Russia, and 326 km (203 miles) ENE of Nemuro (population 31 223), Japan.

5 000 people are estimated to have felt light shaking.

IDF Hits Hamas and Hezbollah Targets


IDF Hits Hamas and Hezbollah Targets


In Gaza, Hamas still refuses to disarm, as it is required to do according to the Second Phase of the Trump Plan. And in Lebanon, Hezbollah has not turned its weapons over to the Lebanese Army, as it is obligated to do according to the ceasefire established between Israel and Lebanon. 

Israel has as a consequence kept up its attacks in Gaza on Hamas, and in Lebanon on Hezbollah, both to preempt attacks and to respond to them. More on the IDF’s relentless campaign against the two terror groups can be found here: “After warning civilians of strikes, IDF conducts attacks on Hezbollah, Hamas targets in Lebanon,” by Sam Halpern and James Genn, Jerusalem Post, January 5, 2026:

After warning of imminent attacks on Hezbollah infrastructure on Monday, the IDF began striking Hezbollah and Hamas terror targets in Lebanon, the military said.

The IDF said the strikes, which were carried out north of the Litani River, stopped attempts to rebuild terrorist infrastructure in the area.

The attack comprised four strikes, and two subterranean Hezbollah structures were among the infrastructure targeted, the army said.

The initial announcement warning of the strikes, made by IDF Arabic-language spokesperson Col. Avichay Adraee on X/Twitter, identified locations in the towns of Kfar Hatta and Ain Al-Tinah as the targets.

Adraee said action would be taken in response to attempts by Hezbollah to reestablish its activities in the area. It did not mention that Hamas targets were among those that would be hit.

Adraee’s post on X included maps of the imminent strike sites, with the target zones shaded in red.

“We urge the residents of the buildings marked in red in the attached maps and the buildings adjacent to them: You are located near buildings used by Hezbollah, and for your safety, you are required to evacuate them immediately and stay away from them by a distance of at least 300 meters,” he said.


Russian Foreign Ministry: West seeking to ‘destroy’ Iran through ‘color revolution’


West seeking to ‘destroy’ Iran through ‘color revolution’ – Moscow
RT


The West is seeking regime change in Iran and is using the color-revolution playbook, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said, commenting on the ongoing protests in the Islamic Republic.

Foreign nations want to turn a peaceful protest into “cruel and senseless unrest,” she warned, adding that Moscow condemns interference in Iran’s internal affairs.

US President Donald Trump has openly expressed his support for the protesters in recent days. The US is “locked and loaded” to intervene in Iran to support the demonstrations, he said, adding that America would “start shooting” if the authorities use force against the crowds.

Israel openly endorsed the unrest as well. Its national intelligence agency Mossad has admitted to having operatives in the Islamic Republic.

Tehran has blamed the protests on Washington and West Jerusalem by saying that the US and Israel had a “big hand” in the unrest.

Russia “resolutely condemns disruptive foreign interference” in Iran’s domestic politics, Zakharova told journalists on Tuesday. Washington’s threats to use force against the Islamic Republic are “absolutely unacceptable,” she said, warning that any strikes against Iran could destabilize the entire Middle East.

The spokeswoman also blamed the economic crisis in Iran that triggered the protests on Western sanctions. The West has been “pressuring” Iran for years through the illegal restrictions, she said, adding that the sanctions were affecting the lives of ordinary people. Now, Western nations are trying to exploit the resulting social and economic tensions to “destroy the Iranian state,” she said.

On Monday, Trump stated that Washington was considering “strong options” against Iran amid the unrest. On Tuesday, the US warned Americans to “leave Iran” immediately. Tehran has previously warned that it could target US forces in the Middle East if Washington tries to intervene.


Trump urges Iranians to ‘take over institutions’




Trump is not bluffing about Greenland and here’s why


Trump is not bluffing about Greenland and here’s why
RT


When US President Donald Trump returned to the topic of acquiring Greenland – one that seemed largely forgotten just a month ago – the idea wasn’t considered mere ‘theatrics’, particularly in Europe. And it’s not just about the ‘Maduro effect’. Beneath Trump’s provocative statements, a clear geopolitical strategy is emerging, one that can be termed ‘new globalism’. This approach is far more economically grounded than the concept of globalization, even US-centric globalization.  

Trump’s ‘new globalism’ consists of three logically interconnected components:

  • Reinterpreting the Monroe Doctrine (One may wonder if Trump considers the Philippines part of this ‘Greater America’ as well...)

  • Transforming the US into an energy superpower that monopolizes the rules of the game in the hydrocarbon market, particularly in regional trade

  • Enhancing America’s status as an Arctic superpower – a position that the US currently holds only nominally 


    Trump’s actions are quite logical: dismantling Nicolas Maduro’s regime is crucial for turning Latin America’s resources into a source of short-term economic stability for the US. This is Trump’s ‘entrance ticket’ into the world of ‘new globalism’. 

     America cannot become an energy superpower unless it has control over Venezuela’s (and eventually Brazil’s and Iran’s) oil resources and eliminates ‘shadow fleets’ as soon as possible. Similarly, achieving full legal control over Greenland is essential for establishing the US as an Arctic power. Otherwise, it would be difficult for the US to maintain competitiveness as an energy superpower after 2030.

    Certainly, an evolutionary path could involve investing in a costly and prolonged program to revive Alaska. However, that would take years, if not decades. Instead, Greenland presents an opportunity to quickly solidify a new political and geographical status.

    Trump acts systematically, choosing his next steps based on the perceived weaknesses of his geopolitical competitors. Apparently, he believes that Europe is sufficiently weakened to engage in discussions about Greenland’s status at a completely different level than in the spring of 2025, when he had to back down.

    We should also note that when discussing Greenland, Trump directly highlighted NATO’s inability to protect the island from external threats, even fabricated ones (like the prospect of Russia and China seizing the territory). Trump’s message is clear: he intends to reclaim any poorly defended ‘assets’.