It’s no coincidence the world is on fire with wars, healthcare has become unaffordable or of poor quality, and famine lurks just around the corner

It’s no coincidence the world is on fire with wars, healthcare has become unaffordable or of poor quality, and famine lurks just around the corner

Leo Hohmann

I have been saying since the CV psyop was rolled out in 2020 that in order to understand what’s going on in the world you must know that the overriding principle driving the policies of globalist power elites is to drastically depopulate the world, and that Covid was just the first shot fired across the bow toward that eventuality.

Global fertility rates have plummeted to near record lows since the mRNA vaccines were mass injected into people’s bodies starting in late 2020. I don’t believe that’s a coincidence. Healthcare has become totally unaffordable for a growing segment of the population even in wealthy countries like America, and even those who can afford to keep their insurance are receiving AI-driven healthcare that is of inferior quality. But the doctor’s office is not the only means of population reduction. That’s just the beginning.

The elitist goal of mass depopulation was plastered in no uncertain terms on the Georgia Guidestones and the timing and manner in which that monument was destroyed in July 2022seemed questionable, to say the least. Among the 10 principles for sustainable living posted on that monument near Elberton, Georgia, was reducing the global population down to around 500 million, in order to bring humanity into proper “balance” with nature.

I have always maintained that the 500 million goal was probably too aggressive to achieve but that a more realistic goal was to cut the world population in half, taking it from 8 billion down to around 4 billion.

Low and behold, a new scientific study has just been released calling for exactly that.

Scientists propose ‘final sustainable solution’ they’re not calling genocide

A group of 11 scientists published a paper on July 26, 2026, in the Sustainable Development Journal the suggests that cutting the world’s population in half would lead to habitat recovery, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, less conflict over resources and less poverty. Some of the authors stated a population as low as 1 billion to 3 billion would be ideal, but all agreed it should not be above 4 billion.

The article states:

“We show that slowing and gradually reversing population growth to 4 billion or less by 2200, while moderating per capita impacts, is the path toward sustainability.”

The paper never says exactly how the world should go about reducing the population by such drastic amounts.

The paper states:

Some who have worked the numbers conclude we have already far surpassed sustainable levels of both population and per capita consumption. For example, Lianos and Pseiridis (2016) calculated the sustainable (overshoot-free) population at 3.1 billion living on the global 2011 average income. Dasgupta et al. (2023), using a different method, reached a roughly similar conclusion. Whitmore (2024) estimates the long-term carrying capacity of the planet as “2.5 billion with current resource usage, and 8 billion with one third of current resource usage.” Willey (2000) presents an argument that a population around 1 billion would be sustainable for “a good quality of life available to everyone everywhere.”

The culling of humanity is presented by the paper’s authors as a gradual, slow reduction of human life on the planet. Of course, it would be too shocking to tell the truth about the timing of the mass die off, likely within the next three to five years, perhaps seven to 10 at the most. That would look too suspicious, and beg the question of what could possibly cause so many people to die in such a short span of time. So they stretched the stated timeframe out 174 years to the year 2200.

At the same time, we see major nuclear powers rewriting their nuclear doctrines. Russia did this a couple of years ago in light of the Ukraine war.

And now the U.S. Pentagon confirms it is rewriting its nuclear doctrine “in preparation for potential war with Russia and China.”

According to an exclusive NBC News report, Defense Department policy chief Elbridge Colby is drafting the new strategy where nuclear weapons are concerned, involving shorter-range tactical munitions. This is reportedly in case the U.S. finds itself in a conflict with Russia and China.

More...

Iran continues brutal hangings of protesters to crush the next uprising

As the world looks away, Iran continues brutal hangings of protesters to crush the next uprising

ALEX WINSTON

At dawn on July 28, the Islamic Republic of Iran publicly hanged Abolfazl Sepahi Badjani and Amirhossein Safari Hosseinabadi in Alikhani Square in Isfahan.

Security forces had filled the square overnight, and videos circulating online appeared to show people gathering in an attempt to stop the executions, before they were dispersed, with several reportedly injured and arrested.

The two men had been detained during January’s uprising and convicted in a mass case involving clashes in the square, the deaths of security personnel, and allegations of weapons possession and property destruction.

Rights groups said the convictions followed torture, forced confessions, and denial of independent legal representation. The two men were hanged at the same location where they had allegedly protested against the regime.

Four days later, guards at Shahrud Prison hanged Arvin Kheirkhahan, a young man arrested during the same uprising, without informing his family in advance. His relatives were instructed to collect his body in the early hours and bury him at 5 a.m. under security supervision. The judiciary issued no public announcement.

One execution was conducted in a public square under the gaze of an entire city. The other was carried out before dawn, with the family denied even the opportunity to prepare for death. But both belong to the same campaign of internal repression carried out by the Iranian regime.

The Islamic Republic’s response to January, when an estimated 30,000-40,000 people were massacred in two days, did not suddenly end when gunfire emptied the streets. It continued through arrests, interrogations, forced confessions, Revolutionary Court proceedings, and executions carried out months after the uprising’s immediate energy had subsided.

The objective is to change what Iranians will be prepared to do the next time they confront the state.

“Right now, it is mostly focused on internal social engineering,” Khosro Isfahani, research director at the National Union for Democracy in Iran, told The Jerusalem Post.

Isfahani rejected the idea that the timing of executions is primarily governed by the rise and fall of negotiations with Washington or developments surrounding the conflict with Israel and the United States.

Instead, he placed the executions inside a domestic campaign aimed at a population facing economic collapse, political anger, and the memory of the January killings.

The regime’s warning, he said, is simple. “If you move, we are going to kill you.

“If you resist, if you fight back, we are going to find you, arrest you, and hang you.”

More...

Saudi Arabia expects imminent attacks from north and south, senior official says

Saudi Arabia expects imminent attacks from north and south, senior official says

 REUTERS

Saudi Arabia expects imminent coordinated attacks from the north and south by Iraqi militias and Yemen’s Houthis under the supervision of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a senior Saudi official says.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, says intelligence reports from Saudi Arabia, the United States and other regional countries indicated civilian and economic sites could be targeted, including energy infrastructure, ports and airports.

Saudi Arabia had also observed drones and missiles being moved, suggesting coordinated operations from both directions, the official says.

The official says the reported threats were particularly alarming as Riyadh continued to pursue de-escalation and a negotiated settlement, adding that contacts with all parties, including Iran, and mediation efforts appeared to be moving “in the right direction.” The official says the planned attacks could be intended to disrupt those diplomatic efforts.

The official says Saudi-US cooperation remained “very high” at all levels, including operationally with US Central Command, and said Saudi Arabia was prepared to take all necessary measures to respond to any aggression.

On July 29, Saudi Arabia said it carried out strikes with CENTCOM against Iran-backed groups in Iraq after blaming them for drone attacks on its oil facilities. Iraqi militias said they would respond to the Saudi strikes.

Tensions between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis have escalated in recent weeks after the Iran-aligned group imposed what it describes as a naval blockade on the kingdom in the Red Sea and claimed a series of attacks on Saudi shipping and military targets. Saudi Arabia has responded to the recent Houthi attacks with strikes on military sites in Yemen.

As Iran chokes off Hormuz, Gulf turns its back on strait to look at new energy routes

As Iran chokes off Hormuz, Gulf turns its back on strait to look at new energy routes

Lazar Berman

Though US, Israeli, and European diplomatic efforts have focused for years on limiting Iran’s nuclear program, the Strait of Hormuz has lately become the center of gravity of the on-again, off-again war between the US and Iran.

Early in the US-Israeli campaign against Iran, Tehran closed the strait, choking off about a fifth of global oil supplies. The move has driven up energy prices around the world, including in the United States.

With midterm elections approaching and fearing that voters will abandon Trump’s Republican party at the ballot box if prices for fuel and other goods remain high, the US president has made Hormuz a priority, trying to pry it open with diplomacy, threats and periodic military strikes.

For Iran, which has proven itself able to withstand all three while keeping the strait bottled up, Hormuz appears to be the perfect lever, letting it put pressure on Trump to extract valuable concessions and possibly turning the waterway into a regime-sustaining revenue stream.

That is certainly the case in the short term, but Iran’s domination of Hormuz has also triggered a process that will sap the maritime passage of its importance to world trade, turning it from an asset for the regime into a liability.

Recognizing the need for alternative routes that don’t run the risk of being blocked by Iran, the region’s oil and gas producers that depend on the Strait of Hormuz are already hard at work developing infrastructure that will allow them to bypass the chokepoint.

The result might not only deprive Iran of the ability to shackle global energy supplies, but could also help transform oil-poor Israel into an important player in one of the world’s most important markets.

A rush to the west

Though most Middle Eastern oil and gas heads eastward to Asia, Gulf countries are focusing on first moving oil westward and away from Iran.

And they are moving fast.

According to a Goldman Sachs analysis, more than 45 percent of Persian Gulf oil exports will be insulated from threats to the Strait of Hormuz by the end of next year. That number is expected to rise above 60% by the end of 2028.

The United Arab Emirates is at the center of that effort.

A close Israeli ally that was hit by Iran more than any other country during the 2026 war, the UAE was one of the top producers in OPEC before it exited the oil cartel in May, saying it wanted to increase exports.

The United Arab Emirates is at the center of that effort.

A close Israeli ally that was hit by Iran more than any other country during the 2026 war, the UAE was one of the top producers in OPEC before it exited the oil cartel in May, saying it wanted to increase exports.

To get all of that oil to world markets, Abu Dhabi said in May that it would accelerate construction of a new oil pipeline to double its export capacity through Fujairah by 2027.

Unlike its other ports, Fujairah sits entirely on the Gulf of Oman, not the Persian Gulf, and ships traveling to and from its ports don’t need to enter the Strait of Hormuz at all.

The new conduit will expand the capacity of the Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline, which can carry up to 1.8 million barrels per day from its inland Habshan oil field to Fujairah.

The Abu Dhabi National Oil Company has also announced a bid process for a liquefied natural gas facility in Fujairah.

“Abu Dhabi is accelerating work on a second pipeline to Fujairah which will connect with the emirate’s offshore fields, as the existing pipeline, which opened in 2012, is linked to the onshore fields only,” explained Kristian Coates Ulrichsen of Rice University’s Baker Institute.

Currently, ships exporting Emirati gas must travel from its sole terminal at Das Island, which is inside the Persian Gulf.

The UAE was already working on expanding its liquefaction and export capacity, Ulrichsen pointed out, but in 2023 had opted to locate a new facility at Ruwais, on its Persian Gulf coast, rather than in Fujairah, to better complement existing facilities there.

The Saudis, under attack from Iran and increasingly from its Houthis allies in Yemen, are responding to the Hormuz closures by expanding their East-West Pipeline to the Red Sea.

Riyadh has diverted more than 70% of its normal daily crude exports to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, helping to keep down global oil prices. However, the pipeline and terminals at Yanbu have limited capacity, are vulnerable to attack, and exports out of the Red Sea via the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the fastest way to travel to the east, are being blocked by the Houthis.

The US is trying to help Iraq shift its oil exports away from the Persian Gulf and toward the Mediterranean as well.

In July, the State Department said it was backing efforts by Iraq and Syria to revive the Kirkuk-Baniyas pipeline, which has been mostly out of ​service since suffering damage during the 2003 US-led invasion ​of Iraq. Washington helped broker the agreement and is encouraging US companies like Chevron to play a leading role.

Israel at the hub

The shift away from Hormuz could position Israel as a key hub in the emerging energy map.

Some plans envision pipelines reaching Mediterranean ports in Syria or even in Turkey, which would add many hundreds of miles to any project.

“Israel is the most stable country in the region, best able to protect its pipelines and ports, and most likely to respect commercial contracts,” said Makovsky.

“The Saudis in particular appear to be looking at Syria as a potential gateway to the Mediterranean,” said Ulrichsen. “There may be opportunities for the UAE and Israel to deepen connections but if Saudi Arabia is not on board, due both to tensions over normalization with Israel and geopolitical issues with the UAE, the lack of a direct land-based corridor access may prove difficult to surmount.”

Encouragingly, Israel recognizes the strategic potential emerging in the wake of Iran’s threats to Hormuz.

Meanwhile, there is precedent for Israel to play a part in alternatives when trade routes are blocked. When Houthis hampered shipping through the Suez Canal in 2024, freight and logistics firms switched to alternative overland routes, trucking goods from the Far East to the Mediterranean via the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Israel.

More...

Prophecy Is The Bible’s Built-In Certificate Of Divine Authenticity

Prophecy Is The Bible’s Built-In Certificate Of Divine Authenticity

Todd Hampson

Bible prophecy is the one line of evidence God wrote down in advance so anyone could check it. About 28 percent of the Bible was prophecy when it was written, roughly 80 percent of it has already been fulfilled to the exact detail, and the fulfillment rate on everything past is 100 percent. That track record is what makes fulfilled prophecy the most compelling reason to trust that the Bible is from God.

I grew up completely unchurched and bought the world’s way of thinking hook, line, and sinker. I believed in evolution, thought the Bible was a book of fairy tales, and did not believe Jesus was even a historical figure. All of this as a young teenager.

Then I wound up in a Christian private school for three months, and things began to change. As I heard bits and pieces of the Biblical claims, I doubted them all, but I wrestled with them because some people I respected sincerely believed them. I could still explain most of it away in my head. But there was one thing I could not explain away: fulfilled prophecy.

That was the key evidence that began to break down my barriers. It let me consider the existence of Jesus, the possibility of creation, and the rest of the Bible’s claims. It eventually led to my salvation a few months after I left that school.

I share that because if you have ever wondered whether faith requires you to switch off your mind, prophecy is a good place to start looking. It is the piece of evidence I could not get around. And it is the piece of evidence you can hand to almost anyone who asks.

Bible prophecy is God revealing history in advance. It is written down centuries early so anyone can check the record. And it is the one line of evidence the Bible offers that a skeptic can examine without first having to believe.

That last part is worth sitting with. Most claims about God require some measure of trust up front. Prophecy is different. You can read what was written, look at what happened, and decide for yourself.

Prophecy, in the Biblical sense, is God’s description of history before it happens, given through a person as a prediction, a warning, or a directive. It is not vague poetry. It was held to an unforgiving standard.

Deuteronomy 18:22 draws the line clearly. If a prophet said something in the Lord’s name and it did not come to pass, that prophet had not spoken for God. Pass-fail, and the standard was set by God Himself.

Anyone can write a religious book that tells you what to believe. Only One who stands outside of time can tell you what is going to happen a hundred, five hundred, a thousand years from now, and then have it happen exactly the way He said.

God does that in Isaiah 46:10: “I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come.” He points to prophecy and says, in effect, watch how this plays out, and you will know who I am.

About 28 percent of the Bible was prophecy when it was written. Roughly 80 percent of that has already been fulfilled to the exact detail, which leaves roughly 20 percent still future. The fulfillment rate on everything past is 100 percent.

When something delivers on 80 percent of what it promised with a perfect record, the remaining 20 percent stops feeling like a gamble and starts feeling like a matter of time.

Why This Matters For You

Fulfilled prophecy is checkable. It is specific. It is on the record. And it turns a Bible you were told to trust into a Bible you have reasons to trust.

When you buy something valuable, you look for a certificate of authenticity, something built into the piece that says: this is the real thing, and here is how you can tell. Fulfilled prophecy is the Bible’s built-in certificate of authenticity. It is woven into the pages, waiting for anyone honest enough to check.

That changes how you read the whole book. You are no longer holding a religious text you have to defend. You are holding a document that has already delivered on hundreds of specific promises.

What Prophecy Is Finally For

Prophecy is not primarily about the future. It is about a person.

Revelation 19:10 puts it plainly: “The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” Prophecy was given to prepare us, not to frighten us. It was given so that when the story unfolded, we would recognize Him.

Things are not falling apart. They are falling into place. And the Author has told us how it ends.