Tuesday, June 23, 2026

Denmark to join mission to help reopen Strait of Hormuz


Denmark to join mission to help reopen Strait of Hormuz


Denmark will take part in the international maritime mission set up by France and Britain to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the Danish government says.

“This will involve a contribution including a group of interpreters, drone capabilities, staff officers as well as the possibility of mobilizing expertise in the cyber domain,” Defense Minister Jeppe Bruus tells reporters, declining to provide further details on the size of the contribution.

The aim is “to strengthen maritime security and guarantee freedom of navigation in and around the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea,” according to a bill submitted to the Danish parliament which is expected to pass before the end of the week.


At least 37 commodity carriers transited the Strait of Hormuz yesterday, a record volume of maritime traffic since the start of the Middle East war, according to data from the maritime tracking firm Kpler, nearly a week after the conclusion of a memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran.

France and Britain, together with other countries, have proposed an international mission to clear mines and secure the strategic passage, to be deployed after the conclusion of a US-Iran deal.


AI-Powered Cyberattacks on Advanced Systems May Be Months Away, Intel Agencies Warn


AI-Powered Cyberattacks on Advanced Systems May Be Months Away, Intel Agencies Warn


Advanced artificial intelligence (AI) models may be able to breach and overwhelm the cybersecurity defenses of governments and businesses worldwide in a matter of months, a partnership of intelligence agencies warned on June 22.

The Five Eyes Intelligence Oversight and Review Council (FIORC), an alliance of intelligence and security agencies from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, issued a joint statement that raises alarms over the threats of frontier AI models.

“Frontier AI models are anticipated to exceed current industry expectations, fundamentally transforming both offensive and defensive cyber capabilities. The timeline is not years, it is months,” the statement said.

FIORC warned world leaders and businesses to assess the risks of frontier AI to respond quickly and prevent “malicious actors” from exploiting software breaches that could impact national defense.

“Boards and executives should ensure cyber resilience is in place and works under pressure. It is not enough to have controls. Leaders must be confident those controls will perform during a real incident,” the statement said.

“This requires reassessing long-standing trade-offs and using AI deliberately to strengthen defense—not just improve efficiency.”

Monday’s statement from FIORC did not reference any particular AI firms, but recent industry discussion has focused on Anthropic’s Mythos 5 and Fable 5 frontier models.

More....


What I saw in Israel changed the way I read the news


What I saw in Israel changed the way I read the news

When I traveled to Israel earlier this month as part of a student journalism trip, I went expecting to learn about the Oct. 7, 2023 terrorist attack, the war with Iran, and the broader conflicts involving Gaza, Lebanon, Hamas, and Hezbollah. 

I had followed the headlines from the United States. I had seen the social media clips, campus slogans, and commentary from both sides.

Being there with The College Fix and Passages made the limits of that coverage obvious.

In the West, Israel is often treated less like a country and more like a symbol. For many on the left, it is the permanent villain, blamed for nearly every crisis in the region. To parts of the right, the conflict is reduced to an unwanted foreign entanglement, as if Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah are not part of a larger ideological and strategic threat.

Both views egregiously misrepresent the people who live with the consequences.

I stood at holy sites where Jesus performed miracles and gave his life. I also stood in villages and saw the devastation wreaked by Hamas terrorists three years ago on Oct. 7: bullet holes, blackened walls, posters with the faces of people who were murdered.

But the trip’s most important lessons came from the people I met directly: Israelis still grieving their dead, Palestinians explaining the complexity of life in the region, former IDF members describing the realities of war, and survivors whose stories made it impossible to dismiss the conflict as just another overseas war measured by its effect on gas prices.

The conflict is not a clean morality play. It is a long and painful history shaped by religion, conquest, exile, terrorism, failed leadership, regional power struggles, and the basic desire of ordinary people to live day-to-day without rockets overhead.

One of the most important conversations I had was with Shadi Khalloul Risho, an Aramean Maronite Christian and former IDF officer. His argument is not that Israel is above criticism. It’s that much of the criticism begins from a false history.

“The Jewish people didn’t come here on behalf of a mother country like Britain or France to exploit resources,” he told me. “One cannot colonize a land where his ancestors’ language is written on the ancient stones, where your kings ruled, and where your prophets walked.”

Israel is treated as if it appeared out of nowhere in 1948, with centuries of conquest and displacement ignored. Khalloul said Arab and Islamic powers “occupied the Middle East, arabized its tongues and islamized its people,” turning many native communities, including Christians, Arameans, Copts, and Jews into diminished minorities.

He was just as direct about the current war. “Iran uses Hamas and Hezbollah as human meat-shields to project power and they in their turn use their own people as human-shields to justify their existence.” 

By “keeping the conflict bloody,” these groups “extract billions in Western aid and maintain their grip on power,” he said. They prolong the war because “peace or normalization with Israel would render their radical existence obsolete.”

Khalloul also drew a distinction that rarely appears in Western media coverage: “Every society has its fanatics, and Israel is no exception, we have a fringe of Jewish extremists. But here is the critical distinction: In Israel, the law fights the extremists, in our neighboring countries, the extremists are the law.”

He continued: “When a church is defaced in Israel, President Isaac Herzog and the Prime Minister immediately condemn it, the police make arrests, and the courts punish them. In Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, or the PA, when a Christian home/Church is burned or a girl is kidnapped, the authorities turn a blind eye, or worse, collaborate with the attackers. Israel’s democratic institutions prove that extremism is a disease we actively fight, not a state-sponsored policy.”

Something that I noticed when we visited the border of Israel and Gaza was how Hamas and Hezbollah deliberately fight from within civilian life. They place weapons, tunnels, command centers and fighters in or near neighborhoods, schools, hospitals and places of worship. They know Israel will be blamed when civilians die. They rely on that blame.

In a recent IDF report, their military said Hezbollah had embedded weapons and infrastructure inside a clothing store, inside a school, near a church, in an ambulance and inside a child’s bedroom. That is not incidental. It is the strategy.

It also clarified something important: Supporting Israel does not require ignoring Palestinian suffering. Taking Palestinian suffering seriously requires being honest about who exploits it. Hamas has brought devastation on Gaza while hiding behind the people it claims to represent. Iran uses Hamas and Hezbollah as proxies while ordinary Israelis, Palestinians, Lebanese, and others pay the price.

Blaming Israel for everything may be the current bandwagon, but it ignores terrorist leadership, jihadist ideology, regional history, and the repeated refusal of peace by actors who benefit from endless war.

Some things have to be seen directly. You have to stand where the rockets fell. You have to listen to survivors. You have to speak with soldiers, minorities, and families who live with the consequences of decisions that Americans debate from a safe distance.

I left Israel with a stronger Christian faith and a much lower tolerance for easy answers. A viral video is not history, and a headline is not truth.


Surveillance Cameras Now Track Phones, Smartwatches, And Pet Microchips Alongside License Plates


Surveillance Cameras Now Track Phones, Smartwatches, And Pet Microchips Alongside License Plates


Law enforcement agencies could soon gain the ability to follow not only vehicles but also the personal electronic devices of drivers and passengers, thanks to a new system that merges traditional license plate scanning with wireless device tracking.

The technology, called SignalTrace, comes from Italian defense giant Leonardo. 

It builds upon existing automated license plate reader (ALPR) networks already installed on roadsides and in public spaces. Rather than stopping at vehicle plates, SignalTrace collects signals from smartphones, Bluetooth wearables like smartwatches and earbuds, RFID badges, and even pet microchips to create a persistent digital profile tied to specific cars.

According to materials reviewed by 404 Media, the system uses algorithms to detect when multiple devices travel consistently alongside a particular vehicle. It then links those devices to the vehicle’s license plate and precise location history, generating what the company describes as an “electronic fingerprint.

This capability could help investigators track suspects even when license plates are swapped, removed, or obscured, reported SOFX.

Privacy advocates warn that such expanded tracking raises serious civil liberties issues. Groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation have long criticized ALPR systems for mapping people’s daily movements and associations, creating detailed “patterns of life” without warrants or probable cause. Adding personal device data to the mix significantly amplifies those concerns.


Leonardo has not publicly responded to the latest privacy questions surrounding SignalTrace. The company secured a patent for the core technology in 2024. In its announcement, Leonardo stressed that the system only captures emitted device frequencies and does not access or decrypt the actual content of phones, messages, or communications.


Leonardo provides equipment and software to police forces, security services, and government agencies. The rollout of SignalTrace underscores a broader trend: surveillance infrastructure that once focused solely on vehicles is rapidly evolving to monitor the digital devices people carry with them every day.

This development is likely to fuel ongoing debates about the appropriate limits of public surveillance technology in balancing security needs with personal privacy.


After October 7, majority of Israelis support rebuilding the Temple, up from 30% in 2013


After October 7, majority of Israelis support rebuilding the Temple, up from 30% in 2013




Twelve years ago, only 30% of Israeli Jews supported rebuilding the Beit HaMikdash, the Holy Temple, on Har HaBayit, the Temple Mount. Today, that number stands at 55%. The shift did not happen gradually or quietly. It happened on October 7, 2023, when Hamas terrorists massacred 1,200 Israelis and shattered whatever remained of the Israeli public’s assumptions about security, sovereignty, and the spiritual stakes of this conflict. A new survey commissioned by the Temple Mount Heritage Foundation and conducted by the Direct Polls Institute under pollster Shlomo Filber reveals a nation whose relationship to its holiest site has been transformed by trauma and war.

The survey, drawn from a representative sample of 1,010 Israeli adults aged 18 and older, found that 55% of Jewish Israelis now support the establishment of the Third Temple, with only 29% opposed and 16% undecided. Among those who support it, 38% regard the Temple as having both religious and national significance, 21% as purely religious, and 16% as primarily a national and historical matter. Just 13% called the Temple Mount too politically sensitive to pursue, a striking drop from the defensive posture that has governed Israeli government policy toward the site for decades.

The October 7 effect is written clearly in the numbers. Fully 42% of respondents said they feel a stronger connection to the Temple Mount and the aspiration to rebuild the Temple since the massacre. Among right-wing Israelis, that figure rises to 56%. Among those who identify as Religious Zionists, 71% said their connection to Har HaBayit had grown stronger since October 7. Only 7% of right-wing respondents said their connection had weakened.

The survey also asked which place best represents the strongest Jewish, national, and historical feeling. The Temple Mount came first, chosen by 52% of respondents. The Western Wall (Kotel) came in second at 16%, followed by Jerusalem as a whole at 15%, and Masada at just 8%.

That ranking represents a seismic reversal from the picture that emerged in a Ynet poll published on July 11, 2013, just days before Tisha B’Av. In that survey, conducted by the Maagar Mochot Institute for the Nachalat Azma’ut Israel Foundation and the Joint Headquarters of Temple Mount Organizations, with 523 respondents, 66% of Israeli Jews named the Western Wall as the holiest place in the Land of Israel. Only 29% named the Temple Mount itself. At that time, a mere 30% supported building the Third Temple, while 45% opposed it.

The contrast between 2013 and today is not a small statistical fluctuation. It is a transformation in national consciousness. In 2013, roughly half of all Israeli Jews believed the Muslim Waqf, the Islamic religious authority that administers the compound, was the de facto sovereign on the Temple Mount. Only 19% believed Israel actually controlled the site. 59% of respondents in that earlier poll supported dividing the Temple Mount between Jews and Muslims by zones and times, along the lines of the arrangement at the Cave of Machpelah in Hebron. There was, in the pre-October 7 Israeli mainstream, a resigned acceptance of Muslim dominance over Judaism’s holiest site.

That resignation appears to be eroding. The new survey’s finding that 52% of Israelis now identify the Temple Mount, not the Western Wall, as the place that best embodies the Jewish national spirit marks a fundamental reassessment. The Kotel, it is worth remembering, is not itself a sacred site in biblical terms. It is a retaining wall built by Herod the Great around the base of Har HaBayit. Its centrality in Jewish life since 1967 reflected the political impossibility of accessing the Mount itself, not a theological preference for the wall over the Temple. When Israelis shift their emotional identification from the wall back to the Mount, they are in effect demanding what was always, from a Jewish standpoint, the real thing.