Thursday, January 29, 2026

Amir Tsarfati Update: Iran’s Slaughter Of Civillians Reaches Unprecedented Heights As Fiery Warnings Sound From America And Israel


Iran’s Slaughter Of Civillians Reaches Unprecedented Heights As Fiery Warnings Sound From America And Israel


The estimates of protesters slaughtered by the Iranian government range from 30,000 to 80,000. Many were shot in the streets, others were killed in hospitals, and still more were unofficially executed in jails and prisons. By far this is the largest slaughter of a civilian population by its government in this century. But the leftist marchers around the world seem to either be silent or just too busy protesting against Israel and ICE to worry about tens of thousands of dead Iranians who were risking their lives for their rights. Islam is off-limits when it comes to criticism. Muslims can be victims, but you better not call them perpetrators.

President Donald Trump has said that help is on the way for the protesters. This has led to both bluster and action from the United States, Israel, and Iran. US Senator Lindsey Graham assured the Iranian citizens, “Trump is a man of his word. He has your back.” Iran responded, “If our country is cornered, it will respond in a way it never has before.” Knowing that the ayatollah’s threats were directed at Israel as well as America, Prime Minister Netanyahu promised, “Any attempt by Iran to harm us will be met with a decisive response. It will be a big mistake, a very big mistake, one mistake too many.”

Other nations have joined the verbal fray. Some, like Germany, warning Iran, while others, like Turkey, warning the US.

As the words fly from one continent to the other, so do American arms. There has been a massive buildup of US power in the Middle East. Headed by the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln, the sea and air power in the region is enough to level Iran many times over. Reports are that Trump will institute a naval blockade of the Islamic regime by Friday.

In response, Iran has deployed their air-defense systems in three key areas. They have readied their thousands-strong arsenal of short-range Fateh-110 missiles and mid-range Qadr missiles. In addition, they have readied swarms of suicide drones along with coastal and cruise missiles. These assets can be used with deadly consequences against the many US bases in the surrounding nations and waters.

President Trump has said that he is ready to make a deal with Iran, the implication being that this will take place only if ayatollahs play by his rules. 

These rules are simple: first, abandon the military nuclear program; two, reduce dramatically the ballistic missile production capabilities; and three, completely halt the terror financing of proxy militias. 

This is likely a deal that the ayatollahs cannot and will not accept. In fact, late breaking reports state that the regime has already rejected any stipulation that demands they stop their military nuclear program. What will Trump’s next move be? Your guess is as good as mine.

Reports are that the Iranian regime is at its most vulnerable since the overthrow of the shah in 1979. For those followers of biblical prophecy who worry about what a regime change might mean for God’s plan, particularly with regards to the coming Ezekiel 38 war, let me set your minds at ease. 

Ultimately, it means absolutely nothing. Ezekiel 38:5 makes it clear that Iran (Persia) will be part of the axis of nations that sweeps down to attack Israel with an overwhelming force. Who is leading Iran and what their ideology might be has no effect on the truth of this prophecy.

When the moment comes in God’s timeline for the Ezekiel War to take place, the leader in Tehran, be he an ayatollah, a shah, a president, or any other title, will ensure that his military is aligned with Russia, Turkey, and all the others against the nation of Israel.

Turkey Eyes a Jerusalem Conquest

Speaking of the Ezekiel War coalition, the pieces just seem to keep falling into place. At one time, the Ottoman Empire led the caliphate, of which Jerusalem was a part. But then the Ottoman Empire ended in the 20th century, and with it any hold Turkey had on the holy city. Ever since that time, Turkey has had a bit of an inferiority complex, both within geopolitics and within Islam. Thus, their sobriquet as “the Sick Man of Europe”.

For Turkey to take the lead in Islam again, there needs to be some kind of Arab connection. This is what makes it especially interesting that Bilal Erdoğan, son and possible successor of the president, assured viewers in an interview this past week that his mother is Arab and that his maternal grandparents regularly spoke Arabic to one another.

In another story regarding Turks getting their Muslim cred back, a far-right Turkish politician encouraged President Erdoğan to seriously consider taking military action against Israel with the goal of ultimately taking back Jerusalem. Once again, it all fits back into the Ezekiel 38-39prophecy.




Iranian official threatens strike ‘to the heart of Tel Aviv’ in case the US attacks the regime


Iranian official threatens strike ‘to the heart of Tel Aviv’ in case the US attacks the regime


A senior Iranian official vowed that the regime would launch massive attacks against Israel if the U.S. decides to strike Iran, after U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday renewed his threats, as well as his calls for the regime to return to the negotiating table.

Writing on 𝕏 both in Persian and in Hebrew, Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council and one of the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s closest aides, said, “A limited [US] strike is an illusion. Any military action by America, of any kind and at any level, will be considered the start of a war, and the response will be immediate, comprehensive, and unprecedented, directed at the aggressor, at the heart of Tel Aviv, and at all who support the aggressor.”

The latest Iranian threat from Shamkhani, who survived an Israeli strike last year, followed Trump’s post on Truth Social, in which he noted that a “massive Armada is heading to Iran” while calling the regime to return to the negotiating table and renounce its nuclear program.

However, Iranian officials continued their hardline stance, with the Speaker of Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, saying on Thursday that Iran will respond if it is attacked.

In an interview with CNN, he said, “There will be no negotiations as long as they do not guarantee economic benefits for the Iranian people. We do not consider dictates to be negotiations.”

Western officials are demanding from Iran the end of the nuclear program as well as ending support for regional proxies and limitations on the ballistic missile program, American and European officials told the New York Times (NYT) on Wednesday.

“Trump can start a war, but he has no control over how it will end,” Ghalibaf threatened in another interview, noting that thousands of American soldiers would be at risk.

In previous instances, the Iranian regime attacked U.S. bases in Iraq and Qatar in retaliation. In addition, the Iranian proxy forces in Yemen, the Houthis, have attacked targets in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates with Iranian missiles over the past few years.

Despite the U.S. threats and offers to negotiate over the past weeks, there have been no indications that the Iranian regime is ready to make any concessions.

The Iranian leadership is convinced that the cost of a war against the U.S. and Israel would still be less than the cost an agreement, a source at Iran’s Foreign Ministry told the Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar.


Iran’s Options for Responding to US Attack Include Advanced Missiles, Closing Hormuz Strait - Expert


Iran’s Options for Responding to US Attack Include Advanced Missiles, Closing Hormuz Strait - Expert
Sputnik


The US was fully aware that attempts to lump Iran’s regional alliances and missile arsenal into last year’s nuclear talks in Jordan would lead to a dead end, international legal expert Hadi Issa Dalul told Sputnik, commenting on rising US-Iran tensions and shrinking opportunities for a negotiated settlement.
Iran doesn’t have a preemptive strike plan or policy in place, but if the US hits first, “the response will be harsh and multifaceted, targeting specific locations and countries, including a number of targets in Israel,” Dalul warned.

“Iran has developed missile systems that can disable US military assets, in addition to its ability to close the Hormuz Strait,” the observer noted, referencing the strategic maritime chokepoint through which some 20% of the world’s daily oil needs flow.

If there is any debate in Washington about whether or not to attack Iran, it’s between “rational people who understand and appreciate Iran’s capabilities,” and “reckless hawks who are indifferent to the consequences,” Dalul said, warning that Iran’s retaliation could fragment the US’s leadership, “because no one wants to be held responsible for damage/losses, especially since Iran warned them in advance.”


Senior Hamas official: We never agreed to disarm, no one’s raised it with us directly


Senior Hamas official: We never agreed to disarm, no one’s raised it with us directly


Senior Hamas official Moussa Abu Marzouk said Wednesday that Hamas never agreed to disarm, casting doubt on whether the terror group will fulfil a key US and Israeli demand included in the American-backed plan for postwar Gaza.

Abu Marzouk’s statement runs contrary to the insistence of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump that the terror group give up its weapons in the near future as part of the second phase of the Gaza ceasefire. Trump has repeatedly asserted that Hamas “promised” to lay down its arms, and has threatened the group over the issue.

Abu Marzouk also suggested Hamas has a de facto veto on any appointment to the new technocratic committee set up to run the Gaza Strip, and stressed that Hamas still rules over the part of the enclave that, in accordance with the ceasefire, is not under IDF control.

The comments came during an interview with Al Jazeera amid efforts to execute phase two of the US’s plan for the Strip, which envisions seeing Hamas disarmed and replaced as a governing force. The terror group has previously rejected disarmament.

“We haven’t discussed the weapons yet; no one has spoken to us directly about it. We haven’t spoken with the American side or the mediators on this issue, so we can’t talk about what it means or what the goal is,” Abu Marzouk told the Qatari outlet.

The senior official said a Hamas agreement to hand over its weapons “never happened, not for a single moment did we talk about the surrender of weapons, or any formula about destroying, surrendering, or disarmament.”

If Hamas was not disarmed in two years of war, “how can they obtain it through negotiations?” he asked.

Abu Marzouk indicated some disarmament was open for discussion, however, saying that at the negotiating table, “we will discuss which weapons will be removed, what will be removed, how they will be removed.”

His account contradicted that of Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, who said that senior Hamas officials told him and fellow Trump aide Jared Kushner, hours before the ceasefire was inked in October, that the terror group wanted to disarm.

Hamas has never publicly agreed to disarm

At least publicly, however, Hamas has never agreed to lay down its arms.

Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza explicitly says that Hamas must give up its weapons, but the Hamas statement endorsing the plan contained significant conditions and did not directly mention disarmament.

Rather, the group said at the time that “other issues mentioned in President Trump’s proposal” — an apparent euphemism for disarming — would “be discussed within a comprehensive Palestinian national framework.”

Hamas, Israel and the mediating countries also signed a separate, one-page document in Sharm el-Sheikh the day before the ceasefire began. But that text focused specifically on the first phase of the Trump program, primarily the hostage-for-prisoners swap, while the terror group’s disarmament is envisioned as part of phase two.

Phase two — which has officially started, after the recovery this week of the body of Ran Gvili, the last slain Israeli held hostage in the Strip — calls for the day-to-day governance of Gaza to be handed from Hamas to the newly formed National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, or NCAG.

More.....


IDF intel chief, Saudi defense minister in DC for talks with US on potential Iran strikes


IDF intel chief, Saudi defense minister in DC for talks with US on potential Iran strikes – report


 Times of Israel is liveblogging Thursday

Senior Saudi and Israeli defense and intelligence officials are in Washington, DC, this week for talks with the Trump administration over potential US strikes on Iran, Axios reports, citing two US officials and two other sources with knowledge.

According to the outlet, Israeli officials including IDF Intelligence Directorate chief Maj. Gen. Shlomi Binder are sharing intelligence on potential targets in Iran, whereas the Saudis are trying to head off a war through diplomatic means.

Binder met senior Pentagon, CIA and White House officials on Tuesday and Wednesday, say the two US officials.

Meanwhile, Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman — younger brother of powerful Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman — is meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff on Thursday and Friday.

The Saudi crown prince has told Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian that Riyadh would not allow its airspace or territory to be used for military actions against Tehran, state news agency SPA reported earlier this week.

Trump is weighing options against Iran that include targeted strikes on security forces and leaders to inspire protesters, sources have told Reuters.

According to CNN, talks between Washington and Iran failed to make inroads on a deal to end the Islamic Republic’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, and that has increased Trump’s openness to major intervention.


Russian President Vladimir Putin tells his UAE counterpart Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan that Russia is closely monitoring the situation in Iran and wants to discuss it with him in Kremlin talks.

Putin makes the comment at the start of talks with the UAE president whose country has recently hosted peace talks between Russia and Ukraine.

Earlier, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the potential for talks between the US and Iran had not yet been exhausted, and that any use of force against Tehran could create “chaos” in the region and lead to dangerous consequences.


The EU imposes sanctions on Iran’s interior minister, prosecutor general and regional Revolutionary Guard commanders over a deadly crackdown on mass protests.

The 27-nation bloc in total adds 15 officials and six entities to its asset freeze and visa ban blacklist, according to the EU’s official journal.

The adoption of the sanctions comes as EU foreign ministers are expected separately to agree to add Iran’s Revolutionary Guards to the bloc’s list of “terrorist” organizations.