Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Thirty Thousand People Just Proved The Gospel Still Draws A Crowd


Thirty Thousand People Just Proved The Gospel Still Draws A Crowd
PNW STAFF


In an age dominated by streaming services, social media algorithms, and endless digital distractions, many have assumed that the era of stadium evangelism has come and gone. Why gather tens of thousands of people in one place when a sermon can be watched on a smartphone?

Yet this past weekend, approximately 30,000 people packed Angel Stadium in Anaheim, California, for the annual Harvest Crusade led by Pastor Greg Laurie. It was a powerful reminder that despite the constant claims that Christianity is fading, people remain deeply hungry for hope, truth, and the transforming message of Jesus Christ.

They weren't there for a political rally, a championship game, or a superstar concert. They came to hear the Gospel.

That matters.

For more than three decades, the Harvest Crusades have become one of the largest evangelistic outreaches in America. What began in 1990 as a simple desire to reach Southern California with the Gospel has grown into an international ministry that has seen millions attend in person and online, with hundreds of thousands publicly professing faith in Christ.

Greg Laurie's own story explains why the ministry continues to resonate.


Raised in a turbulent home by a mother who struggled through multiple marriages, Laurie was searching for purpose as a teenager during the turbulent days of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Like many young people of that generation, he looked for meaning in the counterculture before encountering the Gospel during the Jesus Movement. That encounter forever changed the direction of his life.

Rather than simply becoming a pastor, Laurie became an evangelist with a passion for reaching people who might never set foot inside a traditional church.

That mission remains remarkably relevant today.

Some critics have suggested that stadium evangelism belongs to another era--that modern outreach should happen exclusively through podcasts, YouTube channels, TikTok clips, or livestreams. Digital ministry certainly has an important place, and countless people have come to Christ through online sermons and Christian media.

But something unique happens when thousands of believers gather together in one place.

Faith becomes visible.

Worship becomes contagious.

The Gospel moves from being another video in someone's feed to becoming a shared experience among real people.

In a culture where loneliness has reached epidemic levels, personal connection matters more than ever. People increasingly report having fewer close friends, less community, and a growing sense of isolation despite being more digitally connected than any generation before them.

A stadium filled with people worshipping together offers something no screen can fully reproduce: the reminder that you are not alone.

The success of the Harvest Crusade is also not an isolated event.

Across America there have been numerous signs that spiritual interest is quietly growing beneath the headlines.

One of the most remarkable examples occurred this spring in Jacksonville, Florida, where more than 7,700 people were baptized during a historic "Baptize America" gathering at Hanna Park. What organizers expected to be a major regional outreach became one of the largest coordinated baptism celebrations in modern American history. 

Thousands lined the shoreline as wave after wave of new believers publicly declared their faith in Jesus Christ, while churches from across the country participated in similar baptism events. It was a striking reminder that when people are presented with the Gospel, many are still willing to publicly identify with Christ--despite living in a culture that increasingly pressures believers to keep their faith private.

College campuses have likewise experienced unexpected spiritual awakenings. Universities including Auburn, Ohio State, Florida State, Kentucky, Arkansas, Alabama, and others have hosted large worship nights where hundreds--and in some cases thousands--of students have responded to the Gospel through baptisms and public professions of faith.

These events rarely dominate national headlines.

Conflict sells better than conversion.

Division generates more clicks than discipleship.

Yet beneath the noise of politics and cultural battles, God appears to be quietly moving in places many assumed had become spiritually indifferent.

History reminds us that genuine revivals often begin this way.

The First Great Awakening, the Second Great Awakening, the Welsh Revival, and America's Jesus Movement all began with ordinary people becoming deeply dissatisfied with the emptiness of the world around them and turning toward Christ.

Today's generation faces its own unique crises.


Anxiety, depression, addiction, family breakdown, identity confusion, economic uncertainty, and endless cultural upheaval have left many wondering whether there is something more than the promises offered by modern society.

The Gospel answers that question with a resounding yes.

It offers forgiveness where there is guilt.

Hope where there is despair.

Purpose where there is confusion.

Peace where there is fear.

That message never goes out of style because the deepest needs of the human heart never change.

Technology changes.

Culture changes.

Political movements rise and fall.

But humanity's need for redemption remains exactly the same.

Thirty thousand people gathering in Angel Stadium is encouraging not simply because of the size of the crowd, but because it challenges the growing assumption that America has permanently lost interest in Christianity.

Perhaps the interest never disappeared.

Perhaps millions were simply waiting for someone to invite them.



The Global War On Homeschooling Continues


The Global War On Homeschooling Continues-Now With Prison Time For Parents
PNW STAFF



When did raising your own children become a crime?

That question is no longer hypothetical in Brazil.

In what is believed to be the country's first criminal conviction of homeschooling parents, Audato and Ieda Denardi were sentenced by a court in São Paulo to 50 days in prison for what was described as "intellectual neglect." 

Their daughters were not illiterate, isolated, or academically behind. Quite the opposite. The girls speak multiple languages, study Latin, play piano at an advanced level, and read dozens of classic books every year. Even Brazil's own prosecutor concluded there was no evidence of educational neglect and recommended acquittal. The judge convicted them anyway.

The ruling has shocked homeschool advocates around the world—not simply because parents face jail, but because of why.

The court criticized the family's curriculum for not including state-approved instruction on gender and sex education, tolerance and diversity, and Afro-Brazilian cultural studies. It also faulted the girls' preference for sacred and classical music rather than mainstream Brazilian genres such as funk and trap.

Whether one agrees with every aspect of the family's educational choices is almost beside the point. The larger question is far more significant:

Who ultimately owns a child's education—the parents or the state?

For centuries, Western civilization largely answered that question in favor of parents. Governments established schools to assist families, not replace them. Today, however, that relationship increasingly appears reversed.

Brazil's case is particularly striking because prosecutors themselves found no evidence that the children had been intellectually abandoned. Yet the court still concluded that because the education did not sufficiently reflect government-approved cultural priorities, criminal punishment was appropriate.


This is not merely a debate over homeschooling. It is a debate over whether parents retain the freedom to shape their children's worldview when that worldview differs from prevailing educational orthodoxy.

Nor is Brazil alone.

Germany has long maintained one of the strictest anti-homeschooling regimes in the democratic world. Families who homeschool have faced substantial fines, repeated court orders, and even the removal of children from parental custody. The well-known Romeike family fled Germany seeking asylum in the United States after authorities repeatedly penalized them for homeschooling based on their Christian convictions. Although their asylum claim was ultimately denied, Germany's prohibition on homeschooling remains firmly in place.

Another widely discussed German case involved the Wunderlich family, whose children were temporarily removed by authorities after the parents refused to send them to public school. While some legal rulings later favored the family on procedural grounds, Germany continues to enforce compulsory school attendance rather than recognizing a broad parental right to homeschool.

These examples illustrate an important distinction. Around much of the world, homeschooling is not viewed as an educational alternative. It is viewed as an exception the state may narrowly permit—or prohibit altogether.




Christian Parents In Europe Seek Help From Washington After Swedish Gov’t Seizes Their Children, Calls Church Attendance ‘Religious Extremism’


Christian Parents In Europe Seek Help From Washington After Swedish Gov’t Seizes Their Children, Calls Church Attendance ‘Religious Extremism’

A Christian Romanian couple who formerly lived in Sweden has taken their custody battle to Washington, D.C., after being separated from their two daughters for more than three years over parental “religious extremism” allegations. 

Christians and Romanian protesters rallied at the Swedish embassy in D.C. in support of Daniel and Bianca Samson whose children Sara and Tiana Samson were seized by the Swedish social services in December 2022. Sara was 11 and Tiana was 10 at the time. 

The government seized the girls after Sara made a false abuse report at school. The accusation came following an argument with her parents over phone and makeup restrictions. After the girls were taken at school and without their parents’ knowledge, Sara soon admitted that she had fabricated the abuse allegations. Even though prosecutors found no evidence of abuse, the government refused to return the girls, according to Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) International, which legally represents the parents. The child protection services called the couple “religious extremists,” citing the family’s church attendance, which was three times a week, and their refusal to allow the girls to wear make-up. 

The Samsons fought for custody of their children 14 times in court. They said prosecuting attorneys cited their lack of a television in the home and their reading of Bible stories as “violent” and grounds for the religious extremist accusations.

The case reached the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which ruled on March 10 that the case was “inadmissible,” a final decision that cannot be appealed. 

The Samsons immigrated to Sweden from Romania. The couple retained their Romanian citizenship while living in Sweden until Bianca fled Sweden and returned to Romania after social services threatened to seize their other five children. 

Romania’s Senate unanimously approved a declaration calling on Sweden to immediately return Sara and Tiana back to their family, but Sweden has ignored their demand, said Romanian Sen. Titus Corlatean. Corlatean, who raised the proposal for the declaration, and Cristian Ionescu, the senior pastor of Elim Romanian Pentecostal Church and president of the Romanian Pentecostal Churches’ Union in the U.S., spoke at the D.C. rally in support of the Samsons. 

“They are not Swedish citizens, so Sweden is keeping [the girls] abusively in their custody against the will of the state of citizenship of our own citizens,” Corlatean told Fox News Digital

He also accused Sweden of violating international law and diplomatic relations for holding the Romanian citizens in their care. 

“It’s horrible, and it’s a desperate situation,” Corlatean said. “The girls are asking all the time to be given back to their parents and to Romania, and the social services are lying constantly saying the daughters are refusing to go back to their parents.”


The family has been barred from seeing the girls who have been separated into different foster homes. Both girls have attempted suicide six or seven times, and Sara is now in an adult psychiatric facility.




Turkey’s F-35 push, its march into Syria, and the Sanhedrin’s warning:


Turkey’s F-35 push, its march into Syria, and the Sanhedrin’s warning:


Turkey is positioning itself as the most consequential military threat facing Israel in the north, and this week’s NATO summit in Ankara has put that threat on full display. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is pressing President Trump to readmit Turkey to the F-35 stealth fighter program, while Turkish-backed forces expand their footprint inside a fractured Syria, threaten the Kurdish population that has fought alongside the United States for a decade, and as Ankara continues to host and protect leaders of Hamas. 

As the diplomatic maneuvering unfolds in Ankara, the Sanhedrin, the reconstituted rabbinical court that traces its authority to the ancient Jewish high court, has issued its own pronouncement on the matter, invoking a biblical promise that nations that curse the people of Israel will themselves be cursed.

Turkey was removed from the F-35 program in 2019 after it purchased Russia’s S-400 air defense system, a system built specifically to detect and shoot down US aircraft like the F-35. American officials determined that operating the S-400 alongside the F-35 would allow Russian technicians to study the jet’s radar signature and stealth profile, handing Moscow a blueprint for defeating the very aircraft Turkey wanted to fly. Washington canceled the sale rather than risk exposing its most advanced fighter to a system designed to kill it.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has renewed the argument in recent days, telling Fox News that supplying Turkey with F-35s or advanced fighter engines would upset the regional balance of power and threaten Israel’s air superiority.

Netanyahu described Erdogan as a leader who has called for Israel’s annihilation, occupies part of Cyprus, threatens Greece, and backs Hamas. “The balance of power in the Middle East is ultimately protected by Israel’s air superiority and America’s posture in the region,” Netanyahu said.


Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar confirmed that Israel has objected directly to Washington. “We made clear that we oppose supplying F-35s to Turkey,” Sa’ar said. “The prime minister himself said this to Trump. It is critical that Israel, in the region where we live, preserve its qualitative military edge.” That doctrine, known as Israel’s qualitative military edge or QME, is written into American law and requires Washington to ensure Israel maintains a technological and tactical advantage over every other military in the region.

Turkey’s military expansion into Syria has accelerated sharply since the fall of Bashar Assad’s regime in December 2024. With Assad gone and Syria’s central authority shattered, Ankara has moved to fill the vacuum, pushing air defense systems and garrisons toward Palmyra and the T-4 air base in central Syria. Those positions sit close enough to threaten Israeli aircraft operating over southern Syria...

Israeli officials have warned that if Turkey continues to expand its bases and military presence in Syria, Israel will consider taking equivalent measures on its own side of the border. Turkish drones have already tested Israeli air defenses in the area, and Israeli jets have struck Turkish-linked positions to slow the buildup before it solidifies.


Turkey has also become a safe harbor for Hamas leadership. Ankara has hosted Hamas delegations, permitted members of the terrorist organization to operate from Turkish soil, and reportedly issued Turkish passports to Hamas operatives, allowing men wanted for orchestrating terror attacks against Israeli civilians to travel under Turkish diplomatic cover

Erdogan’s ambitions extend well beyond any single dispute over fighter jets. He has repeatedly cast himself as a defender of the Muslim world and has spoken in terms that evoke the Ottoman Empire, which ruled Jerusalem and the wider Middle East for four centuries until its collapse after the First World War. Turkish officials under Erdogan have cultivated ties with the Muslim Brotherhood across the region...

Erdogan has said Turkey could act militarily against Israel the way it acted in Libya and Nagorno-Karabakh, and he has told Turkish audiences that a Jerusalem under full Israeli sovereignty is unacceptable.


It is against this backdrop that the Sanhedrin issued a formal ruling last week, addressing the nations of the world, and specifically Turkey.

The Sanhedrin’s ruling rests on a specific biblical promise, one the court cites directly: “I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse, and all the families of the earth shall be blessed through you” (Genesis 12:3). This is God’s covenant with Abraham, and the court states plainly that the covenant has never been broken or suspended. A second verse follows the same theme: “Cursed be those who curse you, and blessed be those who bless you” (Genesis 27:29), Isaac’s blessing to Jacob.

The full ruling, issued by the Sanhedrin’s sitting court, reads as follows:




NATO 3.0 and Europe’s search for strategic responsibility


Europe’s military future is starting to take shape
RT

NATO 3.0 and Europe’s search for strategic responsibility

Perhaps the most consequential discussion in Ankara concerned NATO’s long-term evolution.

Alliance leaders increasingly describe the emerging model as ‘NATO 3.0’ – a more Europeanized bloc in which European members assume primary responsibility for conventional military power while the US retains its nuclear leadership.

In principle, this evolution makes strategic sense. Washington’s long-term focus is gradually shifting toward the Indo-Pacific, making it increasingly difficult to sustain the same military presence in Europe indefinitely.

Uncertainty around President Donald Trump’s attendance is a good indication of the doubts about America’s future commitment. Trump ultimately traveled to Ankara, remarking that his presence reflected his close relationship with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Meanwhile, US War Secretary Pete Hegseth had considered announcing significant reductions in US troop deployments before ultimately refraining from doing so.

More importantly, the Pentagon has already launched a comprehensive review of America’s military footprint across Europe, examining troop levels, bases, and military access arrangements. Even if immediate reductions do not occur, the direction of travel appears clear.

For Europe, greater strategic responsibility offers both challenges and opportunities. Investment in counter-drone capabilities, digital infrastructure, joint procurement, resilient supply chains, and stronger domestic defense industries addresses genuine weaknesses that accumulated over decades of underinvestment. These efforts correspond naturally with a gradual American military rebalancing.

A new European military backbone is gradually taking shape around France, Germany, and Poland. 

France contributes nuclear capabilities and has become increasingly willing to discuss extending aspects of its deterrence to European partners. 

Germany has become the world’s fourth-largest military spender and is rebuilding capabilities at unprecedented speed. 

Poland already spends well above 4% of GDP on defense and intends to approach 5% in the coming years while competing with Germany to field Europe’s largest conventional army.

This transformation represents one of the most significant shifts in European security architecture since the Cold War.

More...