Wednesday, October 8, 2025

Russia’s Battle-Tested Hypersonics: Dominating Ukraine Skies While China and US Lag Behind


Russia’s Battle-Tested Hypersonics: Dominating Ukraine Skies While China and US Lag Behind


The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has served as a stark proving ground for advanced weaponry, particularly Russia’s hypersonic missiles. A recent admission from the Ukrainian Air Force underscores this reality: significant difficulties in intercepting Russian Iskander missile strikes. The Iskander, capable of hypersonic speeds, has proven elusive to Ukrainian defenses, highlighting a broader truth—Russia’s hypersonic arsenal is not only fully battle-tested but largely unstoppable by NATO-supplied systems. This edge stems from years of deployment in real-world combat, where missiles like the Kinzhal, Zircon, and Iskander have repeatedly evaded interception, striking critical targets with precision. In contrast, while China has made strides in hypersonic development and the United States scrambles to catch up, neither has achieved the same level of operational maturity or combat validation. As global tensions escalate, Russia’s lead in this domain reshapes strategic calculations, exposing vulnerabilities in Western defenses.

Russia’s hypersonic weapons program has roots in Soviet-era research, but it accelerated in the 2010s amid concerns over U.S. missile defense advancements. Hypersonic missiles, defined as those traveling at speeds exceeding Mach 5 (about 3,800 mph), are prized for their ability to maneuver unpredictably, compress decision timelines for defenders, and penetrate sophisticated air defenses. Unlike traditional ballistic or cruise missiles, hypersonics glide or cruise at these velocities in the atmosphere, making them harder to track and intercept.The Kh-47M2 Kinzhal, an air-launched ballistic missile derived from the Iskander-M, exemplifies this capability. With a range of up to 480 km and speeds reaching Mach 10, the Kinzhal has been extensively used in Ukraine since March 2022.


Russian forces have fired hundreds of these missiles, targeting Ukrainian airfields, command centers, and energy infrastructure. In July 2025, Russia unleashed Kinzhal strikes on Ukrainian positions, with the Defense Ministry claiming all targets were hit despite Ukrainian air defenses. Similarly, the 3M22 Zircon, a scramjet-powered hypersonic cruise missile, made its combat debut in Ukraine in February 2024, striking land and sea targets at Mach 9 speeds. By November 2024, Ukraine reported facing Zircon barrages, but Russian sources assert their effectiveness in overwhelming defenses. The Iskander system itself, while primarily a short-range ballistic missile, achieves hypersonic velocities in its terminal phase, making it a quasi-hypersonic weapon. Ukrainian officials have repeatedly confirmed interception challenges, as the missile’s quasi-ballistic trajectory and evasive maneuvers render it nearly untouchable.


In recent strikes, such as those in October 2025, Russia combined Iskander with Kinzhal and drones for massive assaults on Ukrainian military-industrial sites, causing widespread blackouts and infrastructure damage. These operations demonstrate battle-testing on a scale unmatched globally: over three years of conflict have allowed Russia to refine tactics, software, and hardware in live combat, ironing out issues that simulations alone cannot reveal. NATO and Ukraine’s inability to consistently counter these weapons amplifies their dominance. Ukraine relies on systems like the U.S.-provided Patriot PAC-3, which has claimed some Kinzhal intercepts—six in May 2023, for instance. However, these successes are contested; Russian officials dismiss them as propaganda, and independent analyses suggest many Kinzhals still penetrate.

The Zircon’s scramjet engine allows sustained hypersonic flight, evading radar and heat-seeking interceptors. In a September 2025 drill, Russia showcased Zircon and Kinzhal launches, signaling readiness against NATO forces. NATO’s Aegis and THAAD systems, designed for ballistic threats, struggle with hypersonics’ low-altitude maneuvers. 

The United States, meanwhile, trails significantly in hypersonic deployment. The U.S. military’s programs, including the Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW) and Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile (HACM), emphasize conventional arming to avoid nuclear escalation. ARRW, an air-launched HGV, suffered multiple test failures, leading to program cancellation in 2023, though elements persist in other initiatives. The Army’s Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) and Navy’s Conventional Prompt Strike aim for deployment by 2027-2028, but delays persist due to technical hurdles like heat-resistant materials and guidance systems. A March 2024 test showed promise, but no U.S. hypersonic has been battle-tested.





No comments: