'Intifada in Paris': Islamic Influencer Calls for Violent Uprising, French Authorities Take Action (Video)

'Intifada in Paris': Islamic Influencer Calls for Violent Uprising, French Authorities Take Action (Video)

Amy Mek

France is facing an alarming internal threat as Islamic figures like Elias d’Imzalène openly incite violence, calling for an Intifada on French soil, challenging the safety of its Jewish citizens and the authority of the state itself.

France faces an escalating internal threat as Islamic and radical left-wing figures incite open violence in its streets. One such individual, Muslim influencer Elias d’Imzalène, has sparked outrage after a public call for an Intifada—a violent uprising—at a pro-Palestinian/Hamas rally organized by the “Urgence Palestine” collective in Paris. This isn’t just about protests; it’s about direct calls to carry out violence in France against both its Jewish citizens and public authorities.

In the rally footage, d’Imzalène shouts, “Are we ready to carry out an Intifada in Paris? In our suburbs? In our neighborhoods?” This wasn’t just a rhetorical question—he was rallying people to rise up and take action. He went further, pushing the crowd to believe that this fight for liberation begins in Paris and will end in Jerusalem, expressing a broader, dangerous agenda.

Elias d’Imzalène didn’t stop at calls for local unrest. He named world leaders like U.S. President Joe Biden and French President Emmanuel Macron, accusing them of being accomplices to what he described as “genocide.”

This isn’t d’Imzalène’s first brush with controversy. He’s the founder of the Islametinfo website, which promotes the narrative of “state Islamophobia” in France. French authorities have been monitoring him since 2021 under the Fiche S designation—a security alert for individuals flagged as potential national security threats. Despite not having committed a crime, his inflammatory rhetoric at this rally may be the tipping point for action.

French authorities have reported d’Imzalène to the public prosecutor for incitement to violence. According to Le Parisien, his speech is seen as a clear attempt to provoke armed resistance against the state and encourage attacks on Israeli citizens, Jews, and public officials. French police are actively considering a ban on future rallies organized by “Urgence Palestine,” viewing such events as breeding grounds for violence.

This rally isn’t an isolated incident. It represents a growing problem in France, where Islamic supremacists are using public platforms to spread their violent agenda. D’Imzalène’s words are a direct threat to the safety of France’s Jewish population and to the authority of the French government itself. His calls for an Intifada echo the broader radical Islamic agenda gaining ground across the West.

France is at a crossroads, confronted by tens of thousands of jihadis like d’Imzalène who incite violence under the guise of liberation, linking local unrest with global Islamic ambitions. Despite the growing threat and turmoil, the left-wing government persists with its open-border policies, allowing an influx of individuals from regions steeped in extremism, further fueling an already volatile situation.

IDF Chief Approves Battle Plans For Northern Front, Nasrallah Says Pager Blasts Violated 'Al Red Lines'

Halevi approves northern front battle plans; IDF launches wave of strikes on Hezbollah

Times of Israel is liveblogging Thursday

Israeli warplanes buzz Beirut, break sound barrier as Nasrallah gives speech

Israeli fighter jets are reportedly flying over Beirut as Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah gives his speech.

State media said the jets were breaking the sound barrier over the Lebanese capital.

Videos posted on social media showed Israeli warplanes flying low and shooting flares.

Nasrallah concedes Hezbollah suffered ‘unprecedented’ blow, vows to keep fighting until Gaza war ends

In a televised address, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah concedes that the terror group has suffered a “major and unprecedented” blow, but vows it will recover and keep on fighting

“The Israeli effort has largely been thwarted,” Nasrallah says. “We will probe what happened,” he adds, adding that an investigation committee has been established.

“We will not fall, and we will come out stronger. We are preparing to face even worse attacks.”

“There is no doubt that Hezbollah, since it joined the fight, has registered impressive achievements in the north of Israel,” he adds, claiming that the “criminal” attacks against Hezbollah’s portable devices were conducted by Israel to cover up its incapacity to achieve a military breakthrough against Hezbollah in the north, where it is “embroiled in a war of attrition.”

“We tell [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu, [Defense Minister Yoav] Gallant and the Israeli people: We will not stop our attacks as long as the enemy does not halt its war in Gaza.”

Nasrallah says pager blasts violated ‘all red lines,’ was attempt to carry out ‘massacre’

In a public address, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah blames Israel for the coordinated pager and walkie-talkie attacks on Tuesday and Wednesday, saying the attack “violated all red lines.”

In his first comments since the coordinated attacks that were blamed on Israel, Nasrallah called the attacks “an unprecedented massacre.”

“On Tuesday, Israel intended to kill 4,000 people in one minute by detonating the pagers. Many of them were civilians,” the terror leader claims, even though the devices appear to have been distributed only to Hezbollah operatives. “The following day, 1,000 more in one minute. In two minutes, Israel intended to kill 5,000.”

“We have suffered a heavy blow. This is war, this is conflict. We know the enemy, not only Israel but also the US and NATO, has technological superiority,” he says.

IDF chief approves battle plans for northern front

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi held an assessment and approved battle plans for the northern front a short while ago, the military says.

The statement comes amid soaring tensions with the Hezbollah terror group in Lebanon.

IDF says it’s carrying out strikes to destroy Hezbollah capabilities in south Lebanon

The IDF announces that it is carrying out a wave of airstrikes against Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon, aimed at taking away the terror group’s capabilities.

“The Hezbollah terror organization has turned southern Lebanon into a war zone, and for decades armed the homes of the citizens with weapons, dug tunnels under them and used them as human shields,” the IDF says.

“The IDF is working to create security in the north that will allow the residents to return to their homes, and to achieve all the other war goals,” the military adds.

Lebanese media report large Israeli airstrikes near Deir Qanoun al-Nahr in the Tyre district.

UN committee says Israel violated global child rights treaty in Gaza

Lebanon says death toll over 2 days of explosions has risen to 37, with 2,931 wounded

Lufthansa extends suspension of Tel Aviv, Beirut and Tehran flights again

Lebanon bans pagers and walkie-talkies from flights after wave of explosions

Troops demolish Hamas long-range rocket cache in Rafah

French Politicians ‘Fearing’ Global Escalation

French Politicians ‘Fearing’ Global Escalation

 Lucas Leiroz de Almeida 

The fear of nuclear war is apparently affecting some European states, despite the deeply irresponsible actions taken by their governments. A major French newspaper recently published an article claiming that French politicians are worried about the possibility of a “third world war.” It is curious to see this kind of “concern” among the French, given that Paris has been one of the most destabilizing agents in the ongoing proxy conflict between NATO and Russia.

The article exposes the reasons why French politicians fear a global escalation of violence. Citing anonymous diplomats, Le Monde claims that the French do not want to see an open confrontation between Moscow and NATO, allegedly seeking to take steps to prevent an escalation. Diplomats said that Russia could expand its military actions in retaliation for certain actions taken by the West, which would mean the start of a global war.

Obviously, the main Western escalatory move would be to authorize strikes against Russian targets far from the conflict zone. European fears of a world war are especially heightened at the moment due to the widespread debate over whether or not to authorize Ukraine to use long-range missiles against targets in “deep Russia,” which explains Le Monde’s narrative.

“[Allowing attacks against ‘deep Russia’] would mean that NATO countries, the US and European countries are at war with Russia (…) Everything must be done to avoid a third world war (…) You can’t just dismiss the possibility of the Russians expanding the scope of the war,” said one of Le Monde’s diplomatic sources.

For now, all Western countries refuse to allow such strikes. There were expectations among pro-Ukrainian militants that authorization would be announced during the recent joint visit of American and British officials to Kiev, but this did not happen. As far as the Europeans are concerned, there seems to be an even greater fear of escalation, which is why the French and Germans (who are supposedly the joint “leaders” of the European Union) do not plan to change their position on deep strikes.

“We think we should allow them to neutralize the military sites from which the missiles are fired, and basically the military sites from which Ukraine is being attacked, but we must not allow them to hit other targets in Russia, civilian capabilities naturally, or other military targets,” Macron said during a recent joint statement with Scholz in Germany.

It is curious to see this kind of fear on the part of the French. On the one hand, the fear seems absolutely rational, since Europe would be the most affected side in a direct war between Russia and NATO. It is natural that the Europeans want to do everything possible to prevent the conflict from escalating to a direct phase. With the possible exception of Poland and the Baltics which are states extremely affected by the anti-Russian madness, all European countries fear becoming targets in a situation of global conflict.

However, until recently, France itself was the biggest destabilizing agent in the conflict. Macron was the Western leader who most escalated anti-Russian rhetoric, even promising to send official French troops to fight alongside Kiev. It was precisely the fear of a direct war that made Macron reduce his anti-Russian attitudes in recent months, as Moscow made it clear that all French military personnel on Ukrainian soil would be legitimate and priority targets. Now, Macron no longer depends on his own decisions to avoid a direct war – he is at the mercy of the conscience and strategic sense of the Americans, who actually lead NATO.

It is important for Western analysts and officials to understand that WWIII has already “de facto” begun. There is a Western-led international coalition that has been attacking the Russian Federation for two years. The nature of the current conflict is absolutely international, and there are even other fronts outside Ukraine – as in the case of Western-backed terrorists attacking Russian citizens in African countries. Fearing the beginning of an open phase of the conflict is reasonable, but it is important to understand that this “world war” is already a reality – precisely because of the irresponsible actions of Western countries, including France.

Given the fear of escalation, Europeans should break with the US and NATO, seeking to free themselves from the consequences of the conflict by reestablishing ties with Russia. Unfortunately, however, European subservience is bigger than their fear. If the US authorizes deep strikes, it is likely that, despite their fear, all European countries will endorse the measure immediately.

Why Are Large Containers Being Delivered To Military Bases In Ireland - Shrouded In Secrecy And Under Heavy Guard?

Why are large containers delivered to military bases in Ireland shrouded in secrecy and kept under heavy guard?

Rhoda Wilson

A post on social media last week described unexplained deliveries of large containers to multiple military installations across Ireland which have raised concerns within the Irish Defence Forces.

The contents of these containers remain unknown and are heavily guarded. The deliveries deviate from standard military protocol, with heightened security measures and a lack of official documentation. Senior personnel who raised concerns were met with threats of court-martial, suggesting external control and a lack of transparency within the military structure. The broad distribution of these containers across critical military assets indicates a coordinated and secretive effort.

Michael Yon joined John Waters in a wide-ranging discussion that included these mysterious containers and the invasion of Ireland by foreign people which is often referred to as “illegal immigration” to distract from what is really happening.

The Blood-red Rose of Ireland

By John Waters

An alarming communication was released last week in a social media post by Graham dePenros, who is not known to me. I take its content with a high degree of seriousness because it resonates with claims made by Michael Yon in our last conversation on these topics, on 27 July.  The post stated inter alia:

Over the past six weeks, unexplained deliveries have raised alarms within the Irish Defence Forces. A mix of 40-foot-high cube containers and 20-foot containers have been delivered to multiple military installations across the Republic of Ireland, including prominent sites such as Collins Barracks in Cork, the Haulbowline Naval Base, The Curragh Camp and several other strategic locations. The contents of these containers remain unknown, guarded and shrouded in secrecy. Deviation from Standard Military Protocol for such deliveries typically involves a modest security detail of two soldiers per container. However, in these unprecedented cases, each container is guarded by a contingent of eight soldiers, indicating an elevated security concern of significant importance.

No Paperwork

Compounding the mystery, the containers lack any Bills of Lading, manifests or documentation that would trace their arrival through official channels. There are no records of these containers passing through any Irish port or manifests lodged with port authorities.

The containers are sealed with specialised locks that trigger alarms if tampered with, and each is fitted with CCTV systems. Disturbingly, no member of the Defence Forces appears to have access to the CCTV feeds or knows from where they are being monitored. This opaque operational oversight raises troubling questions about who controls these highly guarded assets within Ireland’s sovereign military facilities.

Threat of Court-Martial

Senior Defence Forces personnel have voiced concerns about the containers, only to be met with strict warnings to cease all inquiries under the threat of court-martial. This chilling response suggests a level of external control or influence that undermines the chain of command and disrupts the transparency and accountability expected within any democratic military structure.

List of Locations

The list of affected locations reads like a roll call of Ireland’s critical military assets: Collins Barracks, Kilworth Camp, Haulbowline Naval Base, Finner Camp, Cathal Brugha Barracks, McKee Barracks, Renmore Barracks, The Curragh Camp, Stephen’s Barracks, Sarsfield Barracks, Aiken Barracks, Gormanstown Camp and Custume Barracks. The broad distribution of these containers suggests a coordinated effort that is strategically significant yet veiled in an impenetrable cloak of secrecy.

The bulletin by Graham dePenros resonates alarmingly with a scenario spelt out by the former American special services member, Michael Yon, who on 19 June issued a warning based on information gleaned directly on a trip he made to Ireland in 2022, and indirectly from research recently provided to him by a person with a military background here in Ireland.

Michael’s post of 19 June was devoted to what he described as the planned “invasion” of my country, Ireland, using the enormous battalion of indifferent male aliens, unlawfully brought into our country by our appalling Government, and now residing here, chiefly in camps dotted around the country, albeit anything but randomly, according to Michael. The picture he painted was bleak indeed: that, as in other parts of the West, the recent influxes of outsiders – mostly males between the ages of 25 and 35 – amounts to a stealth invasion of our country, with a view to its capture and the eradication and/or replacement of its indigenous population.

He outlined in detail the research he had acquired, which pinpointed a total of 36 military-style encampments in the area of Dublin County, and 293 more in the rest of the Republic, accommodating about 120,000 alien males. He pointed out that the locations of these facilities in the vicinity of Dublin were clearly such as to render it easy to block off the main entry and exit points of the city, with the design of the M50 as a “manmade obstacle” also facilitating the sealing off of the capital from the rest of the country and blocking access and egress.

I reposted this warning on my Substack in mid-July, and a fortnight later, having tracked Michael down, interviewed him about his investigations and hypothesis.

This follow-up interview, conducted on Saturday, 14 September, arose from the publication of the above details of containers being delivered to army bases around Ireland, a scenario loosely predicted by Michael in his 19 June post and in our interview of 27 July.

You can watch John Waters’ interview with Michael Yon HERE.

More...

Invasion soon? IDF moves thousands of troops to northern border

Invasion soon? IDF moves thousands of troops to northern border

World Israel News Staff

Amid sky-high tensions between Israel and the Hezbollah terror group, the Israeli army announced on Wednesday that it is deploying tens of thousands of troops to the northern border.

The move comes one day after an alleged Mossad and IDF intelligence operation saw the simultaneous detonation of thousands of beepers belonging to Hezbollah members in Lebanon and Syria, killing at least nine and wounding some 3,000.

The IDF said that it was transferring the elite 98th Division, numbering some 10,000 to 20,000 troops, to the border with Lebanon.

The units within the 98th Division include paratroopers, artillery units, and commandos.

Previously, the 98th Division was stationed in Khan Younes in central Gaza, but withdrew from the area in August.

The 98th Division will join the 36th Division and numerous reserve units, which have been stationed along the northern border for months.

In recent days, Israeli officials have signaled that the IDF is gearing up for an intensive military offensive against Hezbollah.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant both hinted to the Biden administration’s envoy to the Middle East, Amos Hochstein, that time had run out for a diplomatic solution to end the fighting with Hezbollah.

For more than 11 months, Hezbollah has bombarded communities and military assets in northern Israel with near-daily barrages of missiles, rockets, and explosive drones.

At least 60,000 Israelis were displaced from their homes due to the ongoing aerial assaults. Tens of thousands more, who were not evacuated from their homes, live under constant threat of Hezbollah aggression.

On Monday, the security cabinet officially declared the return of displaced northern to their home as a goal for the ongoing war.

Former IAF commander Ori Gordin said that Israel will need to create a buffer zone in southern Lebanon, in order to protect residents of northern Israel and to prevent the Hezbollah terror group from operating in the region.

An Unprecedented Monetary Destruction Is Coming

An Unprecedented Monetary Destruction Is Coming

Daniel Lacalle

Global money supply has soared by $20.6 trillion since 2019, according to Bloomberg.

Additionally, global debt surged by over $15 trillion in 2023, reaching a new record high of $313 trillion. Around 55% of this rise came from developed economies, mainly the U.S., France, and Germany. Unfunded liabilities in the United States amount to $72 trillion, almost 300% of GDP. This may seem high until you look at Spain with 500% of GDP, France with close to 400%, or Germany with close to 350% of GDP.

There is no escape from debt. Paying for the government’s fictitious promises in paper money will result in a constantly depreciating currency, thereby impoverishing those who earn a wage or have savings. Inflation is the hidden tax, and it is very convenient for governments because they always blame shops or businesses and present themselves as the solution by printing even more currency.

Governments want more inflation to reduce the impact of the enormous debt and unfunded liabilities in real terms. They know they can’t tax you more, so they will tax you indirectly by destroying the purchasing power of the currency they issue.

High taxes are not a tool to reduce high debt, but rather to perpetuate the expropriation of national wealth. Countries with high taxes and big governments also have enormous public debt levels.

If you thought the monetary destruction we have witnessed in recent years was excessive, just wait for the suffering we will endure in the future.

In 2024, the world has seen more than seventy elections where none of the parties with access to power even bothered to present a realistic plan to cut debt. Governments and politicians understand that they can make any promises using someone else’s money, and many voters will readily accept the fallacy of taxing the wealthy. Naturally, currency debasement leads to widespread impoverishment.

More...

Deep State Update

Deep State Update

Greg Hunter

Legendary financial and geopolitical cycle analyst Martin Armstrong predicted less than a month ago that there would be another assassination attempt on Donald Trump’s life, and the Deep State was going to do everything possible to start a war with Russia.  He was right on both counts.  

All the chaos, debate fraud and push for World War III comes down to the Deep State knows it cannot cheat enough to put Kamala Harris into the White House in November.  Forget the phony polls where they all say Kamala is running neck and neck with Trump.  Armstrong says his “Socratees” computer program shows Kamala’s real approval rating is around 10%, and all his computer models say Kamala is going to lose big in November no matter how much they cheat.Armstrong says, “Just about everybody in politics looks at Socratees now because its track record on politics has been phenomenal for 30 years.  They know what is going on.”

So, is the Biden Administration panicking with this second clumsy attempt to assassinate Trump while playing golf?  Is our own government trying to kill Trump because they know they cannot win?  Armstrong says, “I believe so. . . . Look, these people have been warmongers. . . . This is their power.  They have gotten so close to destroying Russia, which is their end goal here. 

 Handing long-range missiles to Ukraine, this is like hiring somebody to kill your spouse and then saying, well, he shot, I didn’t. . . . Trump and RFK Jr. are against war. . . . My concern here is they need to create war before January, if not even before the election.  I think this is what all this stuff is about with the long-range missiles to shoot into Russia.  If Trump does get in, they have to trap him into war.  The whole nonsense about Russia Gate and all the rest was because Trump is against war. . . . The neocons called Trump Putin’s puppet because Trump will not engage in war against Russia.  This is what this is all about.”

Will the demonic Deep State try yet another assassination of Trump?  Armstrong says, “I would not put it past them.  Maybe next time they use Monkey Pox or Bird Flu.  Look, Trump represents a real threat to their power.  If Trump gets in, the neocons are out.  Who wrote that recent article for the Washington Post that said Trump would be a “dictator”?  It was Victoria Nuland’s husband.  Why?  Because Victoria Nuland was thrown out of Trump’s Administration.  She has been in every administration except Trump’s. . . . This is the neocons against the American people.  The computer has been showing that this may be the very last election we have.  Just look at the chaos that has been going on at this stage.”

Armstrong is afraid that Putin may be overthrown in Russia because his response has been too timid against NATO.  Armstrong says, “Putin knows the neocons want war, and he won’t take the bait.”  Armstrong is also afraid that if Putin does get booted out of office, then the people who replace him will be far worse, and brutal war would follow.

Armstrong says the evil people in Washington will hide in bunkers when the atomic weapons drop on the rest of America.  He thinks a big problem coming will be shortages in everything –including food.  If there is bigger war, the economy will plunge, and interest rates will skyrocket.  Greatest Depression here we come.

In closing, Armstrong says, “The Deep State is scared to death of Trump winning in November because he now knows how to play the game. . . . and Secretary of State Tony Blinken is running the country” because we know Joe Biden is not.

There is much more in the 50-minute interview.

More....

Doug Casey on the Rising Threat to Free Speech

Doug Casey on the Rising Threat to Free Speech

Via International Man

International Man: Recently, we’ve seen an escalating global crackdown on speech in the (formerly) free societies of Europe and North America.

For example, in the UK recently, the government has been imprisoning individuals for social media posts under the guise of curbing “hate speech.”

What’s your take on this growing trend in general and events in the UK in particular?

Doug Casey: A few instances have been reported about how Keir Starmer, the new prime minister of Britain, has imprisoned citizens for saying quite innocuous things on the street, even on Facebook. But it’s not just about a few random people. It’s a nationwide campaign.

Over 400 Brits have been imprisoned for trivial speech offenses. It’s become a case of life imitating art. By that, I mean reality is starting to resemble that great movie, V for Vendetta. I urge everybody to watch if they haven’t seen it yet.

The disturbances in Britain are mostly about migrants, most of whom are Muslims. Britain has a bigger problem than the US because most of their migrants are Mohammedans. Masses of Islamic migrants present a much more serious threat to Western civilization and values than the mostly South American migrants the US gets.

That’s because in Islamic societies, which observe Sharia law, there is no such thing as free speech. I’ve read the Koran and good parts of the Hadith. There’s no question that if Britain reaches a critical mass of Islamic population, the nature of society won’t just be modified a bit, as it would be with people from Spanish countries. Islam intends to eliminate basic Western values. Islam isn’t just another religion. It’s a totalitarian system comprehending all aspects of life. The penalties for breaking its laws are extremely severe.

Saying negative things about Islam, its prophet, any racial or ethnic group, or even government employees is now dangerous. Saying things that might “trigger” miscellaneous individuals is becoming risky and could be labeled “hate speech.”

This brouhaha about “hate speech” is reprehensible. The Bill of Rights has no exceptions regarding free speech. But forget laws; free speech is the most basic and essential of all rights. It draws a red line between a free man and a serf. And it doesn’t matter how unsavory, agitated, or hateful it may be.

In fact, I’m all for hate speech, regardless of how unpleasant it may be. Not just for the reasons I gave or because I like it (I don’t) but because I want to know what’s on others’ minds. I want to know what they’re thinking, what their psychology might be, and what kind of people I’m dealing with. It’s idiotic as well as immoral to suppress other people’s so-called hate speech. How can you know who you’re dealing with and what they believe?

Suppressing free speech, for any reason, is a step towards turning the West into a series of police states. It’s happening everywhere right now. And there’s very little resistance to it.

The type of people who go into government, almost everywhere, are inevitably those who like to control other people.

In private life, they’re busybodies and bullies. But once they gain control of the apparatus of the State, they’re happy to use force to impose their wills on others. The situation is worse in Europe. But as bad as the individual governments in Europe are, the European Union in Brussels is even worse; it elevates the worst of the worst to positions of power. Durov is being detained in France, but he’d have this problem everywhere in Europe.

What’s happened to Durov shows that even being wealthy, famous, and influential is no longer much of a shield against the types who control governments. And it’s not just Durov who is at risk. Elon Musk has been threatened. Interestingly, among billionaires, only Musk is an outspoken defender of free speech. You’ll notice that Bezos, Zuckerberg, and dozens of other billionaires who control the Internet, broadcasting, and publishing companies have no problems of this type. That’s because they’ve inserted themselves into “elite” and Deep State circles, mimicking their values. They’ll be just fine.

More...

The Orwellian Reinterpretation of Human Rights

The Ruling Elites Create an Orwellian Reinterpretation of Human Rights

Wanjiru Njoya

Ludwig von Mises depicts the aim of revolutionary socialism as: “to clear the ground for building up a new civilization by liquidating the old one.” One of the main strategies in liquidating a civilization involves dismantling its legal and philosophical foundations. This role is fulfilled by activists who embark upon “sabotage and revolution” by subverting the meaning of words: “The socialists have engineered a semantic revolution in converting the meaning of terms into their opposite.”

 

George Orwell famously called this subversive language “Newspeak.” Peter Foster describes Newspeak as “a sort of totalitarian Esperanto that sought gradually to diminish the range of what was thinkable by eliminating, contracting, and manufacturing words.”

Mises explains that dictators express their ideas in Newspeak precisely because, if they did not, nobody would support their schemes:

This reversal of the traditional connotation of all words of the political terminology is not merely a peculiarity of the language of the Russian Communists and their Fascist and Nazi disciples. The social order that in abolishing private property deprives the consumers of their autonomy and independence, and thereby subjects every man to the arbitrary discretion of the central planning board, could not win the support of the masses if they were not to camouflage its main character. The socialists would have never duped the voters if they had openly told them that their ultimate end is to cast them into bondage. (emphasis added)

In the proliferation of Newspeak, the reinterpretation of “human rights” has proved to be one of the most powerful weapons of sabotage and revolution. Activists have seized control of a vast empire of international law, NGOs, and human rights charities with a global network of staff who monitor respect for “human rights.” They wield their significant influence in the human rights industry to undermine human liberty by redefining the meaning of “human rights” to denote the antidiscrimination principle. Under the banner of equality and nondiscrimination, they restrict free speech and other human liberties. 

In other words, the doctrine of “human rights” now denotes the precise opposite: the destruction of human liberty.

Through Newspeak, the Constitution itself has been reinterpreted, enabling socialists to claim that they support free speech and also support the prohibition of “hate speech.” Mises explains that this subverts the concept of freedom into its very opposite: “Freedom implies the right to choose between assent and dissent. But in Newspeak it means the duty to assent unconditionally and strict interdiction of dissent.” In that sense, the concept of “hate speech” is not compatible with free speech. In denoting any dissent as “hate,” it is the very negation of free speech and freedom of thought. Through Orwellian Newspeak, ordinary words like “liberty,” “justice,” and “equality”—values that most people would support—have been subverted and harnessed to promote socialism.

More...

World Waits For Hezbollah Response

World Waits For Hezbollah Response To Israel's James Bond-Style Attacks

 JNS.ORG

The events this week in Lebanon sound like they were taken out of a James Bond movie, as sabotaged pagers used by Hezbollah exploded simultaneously across the country, killing 12 and injuring some 3,000 people, the vast majority of whom were members of the terror organization.

This was followed up with an additional attack the next day that killed 20 and injured another 450 as hand-held walkie-talkies being used as backups also exploded.  These devices were part of the terror group's emergency communications systems that were supposed to be used during a conflict with the Israel Defense Forces.

Experts believe that Israeli security apparatuses were able to access Hezbollah's supply chain, plant the explosives and wait for an opportune time to detonate the devices remotely. This represents an unprecedented breach of Hezbollah's communication system and a reminder of Israel's advanced technological capabilities, which the terror group is well aware of. 

It appears that Israel had access to more than just communication devices. Its decision to detonate the sabotaged pager devices was a response to Hezbollah's attempt to assassinate the former Israel Defense Forces chief of staff Aviv Kochavi, foiled just days ago. Hezbollah, on its part, was quick to point to Israel as the perpetrator of the large-scale attack and vowed to retaliate. 

According to Brig. Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser, former head of IDF Military Intelligence's Research and Assessment Division and a senior research fellow at the Misgav Institute for National Security and Zionist Strategy, the ball is now in Hezbollah's court.

"Based on that, we'll see how this moves forward," said Kuperwasser, who is also a senior research fellow at the Jerusalem Center for Foreign Affairs.

Hezbollah's range of options ranges from the minor all the way up to a large-scale attack on Israel, he said, adding that Israel is prepared for all scenarios.

If a full-scale war does break out, he said, Israel will now be in an improved starting position to create a new reality in southern Lebanon.

A large-scale Hezbollah attack "could give Israel justification for an operation" in Southern Lebanon, he said. He noted however that "Israel can do this without any further justification, since Hezbollah has been attacking northern Israel without stop." 

Still, he assessed, a broad Hezbollah attack in response to an incident for which Israel maintained deniability could provide clearer justification for an Israeli operation in southern Lebanon. 

Rami Igra, a former senior official with Israel's Mossad intelligence agency, told JNS that if Israel was involved in the incident, "What's important is where this leads. Is it another round in the ping-pong game between Israel and Hezbollah--and if so it is worthless--or a prelude to a more significant confrontation?"

Igra emphasized that Hezbollah's military-terrorist capacity remains largely intact. "Nothing significant has happened to Hezbollah's capability vis-a-vis the 150,000 missiles and Radwan forces on the Israeli border," he argued. Igra warned that failing to address the Hezbollah threat now could lead to greater consequences down the road. "The lesson from Oct. 7 shows that when we fail to deal with a threat today, we will pay a much higher price down the line," he said.

Israel cannot afford to allow Hezbollah to continue unchecked, he added.

"Would a war in the north be simple? It seems not, but if we do not deal with it today, we will deal with it tomorrow, and what we do not pay today, we will pay double tomorrow," he said. "I very much hope this was the beginning and not the end." 

The former naval officer also emphasized that Hezbollah's senior command structure had likely been affected by the recent events.

"Probably what is happening now in Hezbollah is that all the command structure from, let's say, the rank of lieutenant colonel in a regular military to the generals, are severely wounded; some of them are already dead," he said. This, he added, presents a potential opening for Israeli military action, though he expressed doubt that Israel would seek to escalate the situation.

More...

Israeli warplanes strike targets in southern Lebanon

Israeli warplanes strike targets in southern Lebanon (VIDEO)

RT

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has said it carried out airstrikes on Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. The action comes after Defense Minister Yoav Gallant announced “a new phase” of Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza and pro-Palestinian militants in Lebanon.

According to the IDF, warplanes struck a rocket launcher and several buildings used by Hezbollah operatives in Jebbayn, Haltam Kafr Kila, Odaisseh and Chama.

The IDF posted a video of the strikes.

The air raids came after the militants fired more than 40 rockets from Lebanon into northern Israel on Wednesday, according to the Times of Israel.

Hezbollah has vowed to retaliate against Israel after hundreds of handheld pagers and walkie-talkies used by the militants spontaneously exploded across Lebanon on Tuesday and Wednesday, killing at least 32 people and injuring some 3,200 others.

Although the Jewish state refused to acknowledge its suspected role in the incident, multiple news organizations reported that the Israeli spy agency Mossad was responsible for rigging the devices with explosives.

Responding to escalating tensions with Hezbollah, the IDF has redeployed its elite 98th Paratrooper Division from northern Gaza to the border with Lebanon, Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi said on Wednesday.

The UN, World Governance And Agenda 2030:

Nations Expected To Swear Fealty To UN At Upcoming Summit Of The Future

YUDI SHERMAN

On September 22nd, dignitaries from around the world will gather at the United Nations headquarters in New York for a meeting called Summit of the Future.

At the conference, world leaders will sign Pact for the Future, an accord in which member states will pledge their allegiance to the UN as a central, unifying power.

"We, the Heads of State and Government, representing the peoples of the world, have gathered at United Nations Headquarters to protect the needs and interests of present and future generations through the actions in this Pact for the Future," the document begins.

"We recognize that the multilateral system and its institutions, with the United Nations and its Charter at the centre, must be strengthened to keep pace with a changing world."

Member states then repeatedly "reaffirm" their "unwavering commitment" to the UN, its charter, its purposes, its principles, and Agenda 2030. They vow to comply with the UN's International Court of Justice and promise to "reform the international financial architecture."

"Reform of the international financial architecture is an important step towards building greater trust in the multilateral system," says the treaty. "We commend ongoing reform efforts and call for even more urgent and ambitious action to ensure that the international financial architecture becomes more efficient, more equitable, fit for the world of today and responsive to the challenges faced by developing countries in closing the SDG financing gap. 

The reform of the international financial architecture should place the 2030 Agenda at its centre, with an unwavering commitment to investing in the eradication of poverty in all its forms and dimensions."

Altogether, the document lists 60 actions that member states should take. In nearly all of them, the agreement makes it clear that the countries's interests revolve around the UN and its globalist systems.

A clause buried toward the end of the document requires member states to embed UN "agreements and resolutions" in their own national laws:

Member states will deepen United Nations' engagement with national parliaments in United Nations intergovernmental bodies and processes, in accordance with national legislation, including through building on the efforts of the United Nations and Inter-Parliamentary Union to engage parliamentarians to maintain support for the implementation of relevant UN agreements and resolutions.

UN official: The UN aims to create a single political identity

The latest draft of the treaty was published the same week that a UN official was caught on hidden camera suggesting the organization aims to be a one-world government with its own military power.

The remarks were unwittingly made by Jorge Paoletti, an associate legal officer in the UN Office of Legal Affairs' treaty section. Paoletti did not know that the person he was conversing with was an undercover journalist from Mug Club Undercover and was secretly recording everything.

"They created this institution [the UN] which is the closest we've ever got to kind of like a world government. A world state."

"Like a one-world government?" the reporter asked.

"Exactly," Paoletti responded.

The United Nations, in Paoletti's words, aspires to be a globalist world government that rules over Earth's citizens, all of whom would be forced to adhere to a uniform identity.

"One of the objectives of the UN is to create an identity of a global citizen . . . of someone who shares an identity, a political identity, with everyone on this planet," he said.

Paoletti lamented, however, that the UN is not as effective as it should be -- though this could change if the organization had military power.

"The United Nations does not have its own army," Paoletti said.

"Should it?" the Mug Club Undercover journalist asked.

"Absolutely," the official responded.